Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Capsule Endoscopy”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Clinical relevance of small-bowel findings detected by wireless capsule endoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: Capsule endoscopy is becoming known as a valid tool for identifying sources of obscure gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Fewer data are available about its clinical value for other indications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty patients (31 F, mean age 47 years, range 14-80 years) with no signs of overt GI bleeding were investigated by Given M2A video capsule for suspected small-bowel disease. The main clinical features were: iron deficient anemia (20), abdominal pain (12), chronic diarrhea (9), malabsorption and weight loss (7), Crohn's disease (CD) (5), and familial adenomatous polyposis (3). Three patients underwent wireless endoscopy for suspected GI neoplasm and one for portal thrombosis. RESULTS: Complete vision of the small bowel was achieved in 55 patients. No small-bowel lesions were identified in 17 patients, but 5 of them had gastric abnormalities. Small-bowel abnormality was found in 38 patients. Lesions compatible with CD were found in 14 patients, diffuse or patchy enteropathy in 7 and polyps in 6. Actively bleeding lesions were detected in 6 patients and potential bleeding sources in 5. Capsule endoscopy had an overall diagnostic yield of 62%. In particular, three small-bowel malignancies were detected and 9 patients received a better definition of their already-known pathology. However, further endoscopies were needed in 10 patients to obtain a diagnosis. One patient, diagnosed with ileal CD, underwent surgery, as the capsule remained trapped in a stricture. CONCLUSIONS: Wireless endoscopy effectively visualizes small-bowel abnormalities even though more accurate selection of the patients is needed in order to optimize its diagnostic efficacy.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed2006

Diagnostic yield and safety of capsule endoscopy.

INTRODUCTION: the capsule endoscopy (CE), from his approval, has become a first line diagnostic procedure for the study of the small bowel disease. The aim of this study is to report our experience since the implantation of this technique in our hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: retrospective review of the CE undertaken in Department of Endoscopy. There was gathered in every case the age, sex, motive of consultation, previous diagnostic procedures, capsule endoscopy findings and complication of the technique. One took to end a descriptive and analytical analysis. RESULTS: there was achieved a total of 416 explorations in 388 patients. The obscure gastrointestinal bleeding was the most frequent indication (83.30%) followed by suspected Crohn s disease (7.5%). Angiodisplasia was the endoscopic lesion more frequently detected (42.2%), especially, in patients with digestive bleeding of obscure origin (OR 3.13 p < 0.001), followed by the flebectasia (10.6%) and the ulcer suspicious of Crohn s disease (9.9%). The global diagnostic yield as for the detection of injuries was 77.34% with a case of "not defecation of the capsule" and therefore need of laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: the capsule endoscopy is a technique consolidated and as his potential is known, his indications are extended. The obscure gastrointestinal bleeding is the most frequent indication and the angiodisplasia the most identified injury. Once known his diagnostic yield, larger studies are needed that assess the influence of capsule endoscopy on clinical outcoumes.

Capsule Endoscopy↗
PubMed2006

Clinically significant small-bowel pathology identified by double-balloon enteroscopy but missed by capsule endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy (CE) is increasingly being used to investigate the small bowel for various indications, including obscure GI bleeding (OGB). However, false negatives have been described. Double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) is a new endoscopic technique developed to potentially view the entire small intestine while allowing therapeutic options to be carried out when appropriate. OBJECTIVE: We described 4 patients with small-bowel pathology missed on CE but detected by DBE. DESIGN: Descriptive retrospective study. All patients underwent CE followed by DBE. SETTING: Single-center tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS: Four patients were included. Three patients had OGB that required blood transfusions. One patient with celiac disease, compliant on a strict gluten-free diet for 5 months, presented with persistent weight loss and abdominal pain. INTERVENTIONS: DBE followed by surgical exploration and resection of small-bowel pathology. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Successful identification of pathology missed by CE. Definitive treatment of small-bowel pathology by surgical resection. RESULTS: CE did not identify the small-bowel pathology in all 4 patients. The 3 patients with OGB had small-bowel masses found by DBE. Two of these were GI stromal tumors and one was an adenocarcinoma. The patient with celiac disease had a malignant ulcer, confirmed to be a lymphoma after surgical resection. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study and small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: CE and DBE are complementary investigations. If there is a high index of suspicion of small-bowel pathology despite a negative CE, DBE should be performed.

Diagnostic Errors↗
PubMed2006

Clinical features of patients with negative results from traditional diagnostic work-up and Crohn's disease findings from capsule endoscopy.

INTRODUCTION: Capsule endoscopy (CE) can detect Crohn's disease in patients with suggestive symptoms but with negative results from the traditional diagnostic work-up (ileocolonoscopy and small bowel follow-through). The objective of this study was to determine which clinical features predict the diagnosis of Crohn's disease by CE in this subgroup of patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients (7 men, 16 women; mean age: 40+/-15 y) with negative results from conventional imaging techniques were prospectively included in the study because of suspicion of Crohn's disease (long-standing abdominal pain and/or diarrhea and at least one of the following symptoms: anemia, weight loss, long-standing fever, perianal disease, extraintestinal manifestations typical of inflammatory bowel disease, elevated inflammatory parameters, or family history of inflammatory bowel disease). RESULTS: CE diagnosed Crohn's disease in 6 patients (26%). Crohn's disease diagnosis was more frequent in patients with a combination of anemia and elevated inflammatory parameters than in patients without this combination (57% vs. 12.5%; P=0.04). The only statistically significant association between an inflammatory parameter and Crohn's disease was an increased platelet count. CONCLUSIONS: CE is a useful tool for the diagnosis of subtle small bowel Crohn's disease. The diagnostic yield of CE in patients with suspicion of Crohn's disease but negative results from the traditional diagnostic work-up is significantly higher in patients with anemia and increased platelet count than in patients without this combination of clinical features.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

First histologic confirmation of the diagnosis made by the new wireless-capsule endoscopy.

Wireless-capsule endoscopy is a new painless technique for endoscopic imaging of the small bowel. A 63-year-old male with iron deficiency anemia and thrombocytosis and extensive negative workup was examined twice with the capsule and was found to have multiple bluish polypoid lesions with a villous-appearing texture. Some of these lesions actually were seen to be bleeding. This is the first time that we have obtained histologic evidence for lesions seen only on the video-capsule endoscopy. The lesion was reached by deep ileoscopy via colonoscopy. On histologic analysis, there was acute and chronic ileitis.

Capsules↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Imaging of small bowel disease: comparison of capsule endoscopy, standard endoscopy, barium examination, and CT.

Capsule endoscopy is a revolutionary new diagnostic tool for the detection of small bowel disease. As the name implies, capsule endoscopy makes use of a swallowable video capsule; as such, it is the only technique that allows noninvasive endoscopic examination of the entire small bowel without sedation. Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding is the most common indication for capsule endoscopy, which commonly depicts arteriovenous malformations, small bowel tumors, and ulcers missed at standard endoscopy and imaging examinations. However, capsule endoscopy is not optimal for the localization of small bowel lesions. In addition, lesions can be missed due to poor bowel preparation, rapid or delayed small bowel transit, or orientation of the camera away from a lesion. Computed tomography and barium examinations are useful for detecting these missed lesions and for localizing lesions detected at capsule endoscopy. Other limitations of capsule endoscopy are the inability to treat lesions and its limited use in patients with small bowel strictures or obstruction. Nevertheless, this new technique is easy to perform, is well tolerated by patients, and, for the first time, allows noninvasive endoscopic evaluation of the entire small bowel.

Barium Sulfate↗
PubMed2003

[Surgical treatment of small intestinal diseases, causing hemorrhage, and diagnosed with capsule endoscopy].

The wireless video capsule endoscopy is a new, painless, non-invasive technique for imaging the small bowel. It can be used to visualise the entire small bowel in selected patients where bleeding source cannot be verified by conventional diagnostic methods. Authors operated on three patients between November 2002 and March 2003, after intestinal bleeding source was detected by capsule endoscopy. The conventional diagnostic techniques could not provide correct diagnosis. The first patient, a 63-year-old man underwent right hemicolectomy one year earlier because of to colonic cancer. The source of bleeding was local recurrence penetrating into small bowel. The second patient, a 56-year-old woman underwent small bowel resection because of Meckel diverticulitis more than 30 years ago. By capsule endoscopy an ulcer was detected in the anastomosis. In the third case--a 60-year-old woman--an ulcerated leiomyoma was found in the first jejunal loop, next to the duodeno-jejunal flexure. In all the three patients resection was performed. The postoperative periods were uneventful. All patients are free of symptoms since the procedure. Capsule endoscopy was able to localise the source of intestinal bleeding, when conventional diagnostic methods were ineffective.

Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal↗
PubMed2004

Safety of capsule endoscopy in patients with pacemakers.

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy, a new technology, allows visualization of the entire small intestinal mucosa. The main indication for capsule endoscopy at present is the evaluation of GI bleeding of obscure origin. Studies to date suggest that capsule endoscopy is safe and is associated with few adverse events. One concern, which has not been studied, is the potential effect of the capsule on cardiac pacemakers and other electromedical devices. The primary aims of this study were to evaluate the safety of capsule endoscopy in patients with cardiac pacemakers who are being evaluated for GI bleeding of obscure origin and to determine whether pacemakers have any effect on the images captured by the capsule endoscope. METHODS: Patients with cardiac pacemakers referred for evaluation of GI bleeding of obscure origin were entered into the study. Before the procedure, an electrocardiogram was obtained, and pacemaker functions were checked. Capsule endoscopy was performed in a hospital setting to allow closer monitoring, instead of the outpatient clinic, which is our routine. Cardiac rhythm was assessed simultaneously during capsule endoscopy with a Holter monitor. Post-procedure pacemaker function was again checked for any disturbance. When the capsule endoscopy studies were reviewed, observations were made with particular reference to technical difficulty or interference with imaging. OBSERVATIONS: Five consecutive patients (4 men, 1 woman; mean age, 73 years, range 56-92 years) with cardiac pacemakers were studied. In all patients, the indication for capsule endoscopy was GI bleeding of obscure origin. A cardiologist and pacemaker nurse specialist reviewed the Holter monitor recordings and evaluated pacemaker function after the procedure for each patient. No arrhythmia or other adverse cardiac event was noted during capsule transmission. No pacemaker-induced interference on the capsule endoscopy images was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule endoscopy appears to be safe in patients with cardiac pacemakers and does not appear to be associated with any significant adverse cardiac event. Pacemakers do not interfere with capsule imaging.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Guidelines for capsule endoscopy: diagnoses will be missed.

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy represents a significant advance in the investigation of intestinal disease. National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence, European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines support capsule endoscopy in obscure GI bleeding, Crohn's disease and the evaluation of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug side-effects, polyposis syndromes and coeliac disease. AIM: To determine whether the application of guidelines leads to missed diagnoses that would have been made if less stringent indications were adopted. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive unselected capsule endoscopy examinations at Homerton Hospital, from October 2003 to November 2005. All referrals accepted following traditional investigations. Indications and findings were recorded. Comparison made as to whether diagnoses would have been missed if guidelines had been followed and capsule endoscopy not performed. RESULTS: Among the subjects 37 patients were children and 55 were male. Indications included recurrent bleeding and anaemia, assessment of Crohn's disease, 'others', i.e. assessment of coeliac disease, Peutz-Jehgers syndrome, Blue Rubber Bleb syndrome or non-specific abdominal pain. In patients with coeliac disease, widespread enteropathy was confirmed, with additional diagnoses of delayed gastric emptying and colitis. For those with abdominal pain findings included angiodysplasia, lymphoid hyperplasia and distal small bowel ulcers. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule endoscopy in patients with non-conventional indications yielded abnormal pathology, such as ulcers and inflammation. If published guidelines had been followed such diagnoses would have been missed.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

[Capsule endoscopy in small bowel diagnostics].

INTRODUCTION: Capsule endoscopy allows for the first time total and painless imaging of the entire small bowel. The main indication for capsule endoscopy is obscure gastrointestinal bleeding which not explained by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, colonoscopy and small bowel radiology. Capsule endoscopy has also the capacity to detect tiny small bowel manifestations of other pathologic conditions such as Crohns's disease. METHOD AND AIMS: The GivenM2A wireless capsule endoscopy system for investigation of the whole small bowel was developed in the late 1990s. The small size swallowable capsule contains a miniature video camera, four light sources, two batteries and a radiotransmitter. This paper describes the capsule endoscopy examination method and summerizes the initial achievements from two medical centres, the Petz Aladár County and Teaching Hospital and from the Malmö University Hospital. RESULTS: 42 patients were included of whom 37 patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Pathological small bowel findings were detected in 62% of the all cases, and the source of bleeding was identified by the M2A capsule in 56.7% of the chronic bleeders. The diagnostic sensitivity of the capsule endoscopy in obscure gastrointestinal bleedings was superior both to that of push enteroscopy, 19%, and enterography, 6.7%. The capsule endoscopy was well tolerated and accepted by the patients. CONCLUSIONS: This new diagnostic method is promising mainly for detection of a small bowel source of obscure bleedings. The availability of the method in major gastroenterological centers is strongly recommended.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Effect of oral purgatives on gastric and small bowel transit time in capsule endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: During ingestible capsule endoscopy, video images are recorded throughout the device's natural propulsion through the digestive system. Shortening the transit time of the wireless video capsule through the stomach and small bowel could reduce the time needed to read and analyze the resultant images, utilize more effectively the short life of the capsule battery (7 +/- 1 hours) and make it possible to image the entire small bowel. OBJECTIVE: To measure gastric and small bowel transit times, with and without preparation, using capsule endoscopy. METHODS: Capsule transit times through the stomach, small bowel and colon were evaluated by analysis of the videos generated during the capsule's passage. The study group included 62 patients with small and large bowel pathologies (e.g., iron deficiency anemia, Crohn's disease). The patients were divided into three groups: prepared with polyethylene glycol (Group A, n = 9), prepared with sodium phosphate (Group B, n = 13), and with no preparation (Group C, n = 40). RESULTS: The gastric emptying times were 20.4 +/- 15.2 minutes in group A, 55.7 +/- 45.1 in group B, and 48.3 +/- 28.7 in group C (P = 0.01). The capsule produced views of the cecum in only 49 of the 62 patients. The mean small bowel transit time for these 49 patients was 238.8 +/- 82.1 minutes, making the mean times for the groups (A,B,C) 148.9 +/- 32.6, 289.4 +/- 77.2 and 249.3 +/- 73.9 minutes respectively (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Compared to both SP and no preparation, preparation of the colon with PEG significantly shortened the transit time of the capsule through the stomach and small bowel.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Capsule endoscopy retention: is it a complication?

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy has been found superior to barium x-rays and push enteroscopy in the investigation of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and in the evaluation of suspected Crohn's disease. Currently, small bowel obstruction and strictures are considered by many physicians to be a contraindication to capsule endoscopy for fear of capsule retention or impaction. The goal of this study was to reassess this conventional wisdom that capsule endoscopy is contraindicated in small bowel obstruction and to determine the safety and efficacy of capsule endoscopy in the evaluation of patients with suspected stricture or small bowel obstruction. STUDY: A retrospective chart review was performed using a database of 568 capsule endoscopy cases performed between August 2001 and November 2003. Cases of suspected small bowel obstruction were selected and reviewed. RESULTS: Nineteen cases were identified in which capsule endoscopy was used in the setting of suspected small bowel obstruction. The diagnosis of suspected small bowel obstruction was based on symptoms alone in 8 cases and on symptoms plus abnormal radiographs in the remaining 11 cases. Capsule endoscopy made a definitive diagnosis in 5 of the 19 cases (26%): 2 Crohn's strictures, 1 radiation induced stricture, 1 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug induced stricture, and 1 MALT lymphoma. The capsule was retained proximal to a stricture in 4 cases, in which the obstructing lesions were electively resected without complications. There was no case in which administration of the capsule led to an acute small bowel obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule endoscopy can be safely used to help identify the etiology and site of a small bowel obstruction. Retention of the capsule may indicate the presence of a lesion requiring surgery, but small bowel obstruction or strictures are not in themselves contraindications to the procedure. It is understood, however, that retention may lead to surgery in a patient who otherwise may have been treated medically without surgery for the same illness (eg, Crohn's disease and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug enteropathy).

Adult↗
PubMed2005

A pooled analysis to evaluate results of capsule endoscopy trials.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Capsule endoscopy is a new tool in the evaluation of the small intestine. To speed evaluation and acceptance of this technology, the manufacturer (Given Imaging Ltd, Yoqneam, Israel) funded several trials. The data from these trials were collected at a central repository using a standardized reporting tool. Presentation of this data to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in July 2003 led to the removal of the adjunctive term with regard to indication for capsule endoscopy, recognizing that the method is of independent importance for evaluating the small bowel. The aim of the present study was to combine the data from several capsule trials to help determine the yield and miss rate of capsule endoscopy for different diseases, compared with alternative diagnostic modalities. METHODS: Capsule studies were identified from a master database of funded studies. Studies were included in the pooled analysis if they reported a prospective comparison with another modality for evaluation of the small intestine. RESULTS: 32 studies with a total of 691 patients were found in the master database, of which 24 studies, representing 530 patients, met inclusion criteria and were entered into the pooled analysis. Prior to study entry, patients had undergone a mean of 6.77 diagnostic procedures, without findings. Of these 24 studies, 14 (involving 310 patients) were categorized as "bleeding" studies, and 10 studies (220 patients) as "nonbleeding small-bowel disorders" studies. The comparison procedure was push enteroscopy in 300 patients (in 45 for nonbleeding disorders), small-bowel series in 140 patients (in 125 for non-bleeding disorders), and colonoscopy with ileoscopy in 90 patients (50 for nonbleeding disorders). Overall analysis per patient showed new findings from capsule endoscopy in 50 % of patients; 17 % had new findings from the comparison method; in 22 % there were similar findings; and in 11 % there were no findings. A total of 1349 instances of disease were identified in the 530 examinations. Capsule endoscopy solely detected 87 % of the disease instances, while the comparison method solely detected 13 %. The yield for push enteroscopy alone was 14.8 %, for small-bowel series it was 9.9 %, and for colonoscopy it was 13.2 %. Capsule endoscopy missed 146 disease instances for a miss rate of 10 %; 989 were missed by the comparison methods for a miss rate of 73 %; and 214 were detected by both methods. CONCLUSION: Capsule endoscopy is the state of the art method for noninvasive detection of small-bowel disease.

Adolescent↗