Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cancer genetics”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Clinical and research issues in breast cancer genetics.

Breast cancer is the most common form of cancer in women in the U.S. The risk factors for developing breast cancer include increasing age, a family history of breast cancer, and the lack of a child by age 30. A substantial fraction of breast cancer, however, occurs in women who have no identifiable risk factors. The diagnosis, pathology, treatment, and presymptomatic testing of cancer susceptibility genes are reviewed. Syndromes with an associated risk of breast cancer are described, such as hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome, Li-Fraumeni syndrome, ataxia telangiectasia, and Cowden's disease. With the localization of the BRCA1 gene to chromosome 17q21 and the BRCA2 gene to chromosome 13q12, issues surrounding breast cancer susceptibility genetic testing are assuming an ever greater measure of importance. The sensitivity and specificity for molecular testing of cancer susceptibility genes, however, have not been well defined. The progress in presymptomatic genetic testing is further hampered by various factors such as the technical difficulty in distinguishing mutations from polymorphisms, the number of different mutations identified thus far and the possibility of false positive and false negative results. Laboratory quality assurance/quality control issues are of paramount importance to avoid misleading interpretations. Many issues surrounding genetic screening and testing, such as insurance and employment discrimination, privacy, and informed consent, are under active debate, and guidelines and standards are under active development. It is therefore important to proceed with caution, so that irreversible harm resulting from data misinterpretation can be avoided.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Cancer risks in women with 2 breast or ovarian cancers: clues to genetic cancer susceptibility.

Women diagnosed with 2 cancers of the breast and/or ovary are at higher risk of developing subsequent cancers. Using registrations from the Thames Cancer Registry, we quantified the risks at different cancer sites. Increased risks were found for cancers that are part of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumour spectrum: oropharyngeal cancer, malignant melanoma of the skin (BRCA2) and colon cancer (BRCA1). We also found significantly increased risks of myeloid leukaemia (probably due to radiotherapy) and of cancer of the corpus uteri (which may be due to hormonal factors).

Breast Neoplasms↗

Genetic cancer risk assessment and counseling: recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors.

These cancer genetic counseling recommendations describe the medical, psychosocial, and ethical ramifications of identifying at-risk individuals through cancer risk assessment with or without genetic testing. They were developed by members of the Practice Issues Subcommittee of the National Society of Genetic Counselors Cancer Genetic Counseling Special Interest Group. The information contained in this document is derived from extensive review of the current literature on cancer genetic risk assessment and counseling as well as the personal expertise of genetic counselors specializing in cancer genetics. The recommendations are intended to provide information about the process of genetic counseling and risk assessment for hereditary cancer disorders rather than specific information about individual syndromes. Key components include the intake (medical and family histories), psychosocial assessment (assessment of risk perception), cancer risk assessment (determination and communication of risk), molecular testing for hereditary cancer syndromes (regulations, informed consent, and counseling process), and follow-up considerations. These recommendations should not be construed as dictating an exclusive course of management, nor does use of such recommendations guarantee a particular outcome. These recommendations do not displace a health care provider's professional judgment based on the clinical circumstances of a client.

Critical Pathways↗

Basic principles of cancer genetics.

All cancer can be described as genetic, that is, due to altered DNA. Many of these mutations will be accumulated during the normal division of cells. However, some people may inherit abnormal genes, which predispose those individuals to high risk of certain malignancies. These individuals can sometimes be identified as having a family history of affected individuals, some of which might have early age of onset or multiple malignancies. Specific genes have been identified as being associated with certain of these malignancies. The hereditary cancers include (but are not limited to) ovary, breast, colon, endometrium, and to a lesser extent, prostate, skin and pancreas. Some of these cancer predisposing genes are highly penetrant with up to 80 to 90 percent of gene carriers developing the associated malignancy within a 70 year life expectancy. Molecular testing for the presence of cancer predisposing genes is available for many of the hereditary syndromes. While there currently is no way to correct a mutant gene, early detection and some techniques of chemoprevention are of clinical value. People who fear that they are at high risk only learn that they are not, can benefit from the relief of anxiety through the genetic counseling process.

Genetic Counseling↗

Acceptance, motivators, and barriers in attending breast cancer genetic counseling in Asians.

AIM: Cancer genetic risk assessment clinics represent the primary prevention arm in oncology in identifying high-risk patients for screening and prevention, but deals with the taboo subject of cancer risk prediction. Low knowledge level and traditional beliefs may pose significant barriers to its acceptance in Asia. METHODS: We conducted a questionnaire survey to evaluate the acceptance of breast cancer genetic counseling. RESULTS: More than 70% of the 438 respondents indicated interest and perceived potential benefits. Higher education level and use of English were associated with greater acceptance. Learning about cancer risk and cancer detection, helping the family, and the doctor's recommendation, were important motivators, while misperception that cancer patients could not gain personally, concerns of not understanding the information, cost issues, and fears of bad news, were important barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Singaporean women were receptive to cancer genetics counseling. Education to correct misperceptions may optimize utilization of a cancer genetics service.

Adult↗

Oncology nurses' knowledge, practice, and educational needs regarding cancer genetics.

This study evaluated oncology nurses' knowledge of cancer genetics and related topics, and identified current practice patterns and perceived educational needs in this area. A 54-item study questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of 1,200 Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) members and 75 members of the ONS-Cancer Genetics Special Interest Group; 656 (51%) of those eligible responded. After exclusions, we analyzed 573 responses. Most respondents were Caucasian, female, and worked in hospital or outpatient settings. Half were staff nurses and 8% specialized in cancer genetics. Respondents with higher levels of nursing education or with continuing education in cancer genetics, who worked in positions other than staff nurses, and whose primary practice area was cancer genetics had significantly higher mean scores overall on questions measuring knowledge of cancer genetics and related areas. Higher perceived educational needs to improve knowledge or practice related to cancer genetics at basic, intermediate or advanced levels were associated with all or some of the following variables: lower education; hospital/ outpatient or managed care/private practice settings; lack of continuing education in cancer genetics, and positions other than advanced practice nurses. Although nearly half of the respondents had received patient inquiries regarding cancer genetics, only 35% were aware of referral resources and 26% had made such referrals. These findings may be used to develop targeted educational approaches that prepare oncology nurses to incorporate cancer genetics into any level of practice.

Analysis of Variance↗

Prostate cancer genetics.

Prostate cancer (PC) is the most frequent malignant tumor among men over 50 years old. Its incidence varies according to countries and ethnic groups. Known risk factors are race and positive family history of the disease. Familial aggregation (at least 2 cases in the family) is observed in about 20% of cases and a hereditary form of PC, compatible with a Mendelian inheritance, in 5%. This proportion increases with younger age at diagnosis. Eight putative loci are already identified for hereditary PC but undoubtedly, others will be found in forthcoming studies. The genetic heterogeneity observed in hereditary PC reflects variety of origins of the studied families. Agreggation of PC and other cancers in some families suggests the involvement of common susceptibility genes. In other familial form and in sporadic cases, the genetic component should be polygenic: PC wouldn't result from segregation of a major gene mutation transmitted according to a monogenic inheritance, but rather to sharing of alleles at many loci, each contributing to a small increase in cancer risk. Indeed, several genetic polymorphisms were associated with an increased risk of developing PC and could explain the variations of PC incidence observed between populations.

Humans↗

Progress in cancer genetics: lessons from pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: In the near future advances in the molecular basis of cancer are expected to facilitate cancer diagnosis, to rationalize treatment, to facilitate screening, and to identify individuals requiring cancer prevention strategies. METHODS: The literature was reviewed concerning the genetic alterations that contribute to pancreatic cancer development. RESULTS: Virtually all pancreatic cancers have inactivation of the p16 pathway, and the majority inactivate the TGF beta/DPC4 and p53 tumor-suppressive pathways. Pancreatic cancers with mismatch repair deficiency have a characteristic histology and may have an improved prognosis. The recently discovered tumor suppressor genes, ALK-5, MKK4, and STK11 (the gene responsible for Peutz-Jeghers syndrome) are all targeted for mutation in a small proportion of sporadic pancreatic cancers. Germline mutations of the BRCA2 gene are present in 5-10% of patients with pancreatic cancer. Typically such patients do not have a family history of pancreatic cancer and are mistaken as patients with sporadic disease. Five to 10% of patients with pancreatic cancer have first-degree relatives that will develop pancreatic cancer. Some such families also have a family history of melanoma and harbor germline p16 mutations. However, the gene(s) responsible for much of the inherited predisposition to pancreatic cancer remain to be identified. CONCLUSION: Further advances in pancreatic cancer molecular genetics are needed to facilitate the development of molecular screening tests, to identify additional familial susceptibility genes, and to identify targets for rational therapeutic targeting.

Chromosome Aberrations↗

GPs' views on their role in cancer genetics services and current practice.

BACKGROUND: Increasing demand for cancer genetics services has necessitated an urgent review of how these services are organized and, in particular, identification of an effective role for primary care. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the views of GPs on their role in cancer genetics services and their confidence in performing that role; to assess their understanding of cancer genetics, current practice and referral behaviour; and to identify needs for information and training to enable GPs to play an effective role in these services. METHOD: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey of GPs was conducted through general practices in SE Scotland; 397 (response rate 59.3%) GPs returned a completed questionnaire. Outcome measures were: responders' perceptions of their role in cancer genetics services; confidence within that role; understanding of cancer genetics; current practice regarding patients presenting with concerns about their family history of cancer; and perceived information and training needs. RESULTS: GPs identified their role to be: taking a family history; making appropriate referrals to specialist services; providing emotional support; teaching breast self-examination; and discussing need for screening. Lack of confidence within this role was reflected in low levels of understanding of cancer genetics and in inappropriate referral practices. Concerns were expressed about the increasingly specialist role demanded of primary care. A desire for referral guidelines and community genetics clinics was identified. CONCLUSIONS: GPs readily identify a role for themselves in cancer genetics services, but admit to a lack of confidence in this area, calling for clear referral guidelines and specialist community support. Current inappropriate referral to specialist services results from a lack of confidence in estimating cancer risk, highlighting the need for the development of clear referral criteria. Given the rapidly increasing demand for cancer genetics services and the vital role of primary care, it is important to identify a model of these services that facilitates effective involvement of GPs without further increasing their workload.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

An oncologist-based model of cancer genetic counselling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: We describe a multistep model of cancer genetic counselling designed to promote awareness, and disease surveillance and preventive measures for hereditary and familial breast and ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Step T0 of the model entails information giving; this is followed by pedigree analysis and risk estimation (T1), risk communication and genetic testing (T2), and genetic test result communication (T3). User consent was required to proceed from one step to the next. Surveillance and preventive measures are proposed to at-risk users. Of the 311 subjects who requested cancer genetic counselling, consent data to each counselling step were available for 295: 93 were disease-free, 187 had breast cancer, 12 had ovarian cancer and three had breast plus ovarian cancer. RESULTS: Consent was high at T0 (98.39%), T1 (96.40%) and T2 (99.65%). Consent decreased at the crucial points of counselling: T2 (87.71%) and T3 [genetic test result communication (85.08%), and extension of counselling to and testing of relatives (65.36%)]. CONCLUSIONS: The model fosters the user's knowledge about cancer and favours identification of at-risk subjects. Furthermore, by promoting awareness about genetic testing and surveillance measures, the algorithm enables users to make a fully informed choice of action in case of predisposing or familial cancer risk.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Four years analysis of cancer genetic clinics activity in France from 1994 to 1997: a survey on 801 patients. French Cooperative Network/Groupe Génétique et Cancer de la Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer.

AIM: In order to evaluate the characteristics and the evolution of cancer genetics activity in France, a survey was conducted at the national level during a period of 4 years from 1994 to 1997 through the French Cooperative Network, a multidisciplinary group formed to investigate inherited tumors. METHOD: A questionnaire was sent to all the 29 French non-specialized cancer genetic clinics to evaluate activity during a period of 4 consecutive weeks each year from 1994 to 1997. Items concerning the cancer genetic clinics, the consultees and the types of consultation were explored. RESULTS: A total number of 801 consultees were seen during the period of analysis. Some prominent characteristics of patients attending cancer genetic clinics were found. The majority of these are women (88%), and the mean age of consultees is 48 years. Fifty five percent of consultees are affected with cancer, and breast (personal and/or family history) is the most frequent site involved (63%). A genetic predisposition is certain or likely in about 53% of cases and unlikely in only 13% of consultations. The majority of consultations are devoted to new families (71%). The mean duration of consultations is 50 minutes, but 40% have a duration of at least 1 hour. Variations of several parameters during the 4 years period were observed and analyzed. Finally, since duration of consultations (more or equal to 1 hour) and personal or family history of breast/ovarian cancer appeared as pivotal elements in our study and consequently may affect the organization of clinics and the structuring as well as the evolution of cancer genetic activity in France, we analyzed more precisely the factors significantly associated with these 2 elements. CONCLUSION: Study compliance was fair (60% of centers) and these results give a good measure of cancer genetic activity in France. The variation of parameters from one year to another may reflect modifications in medical practice (medical orientation rather than research focus and content of cancer genetic clinics) and/or scientific breakthroughs in cancer genetics such as identification of genes predisposing to cancer.

Adult↗

The Cancer Genetics Network: recruitment results and pilot studies.

OBJECTIVE: The National Cancer Institute established the Cancer Genetics Network (CGN) to support collaborative investigations into the genetic basis of cancer susceptibility, explore mechanisms to integrate this new knowledge into medical practice, and identify ways of addressing the associated psychosocial, ethical, legal, and public health issues. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The CGN has developed the complex infrastructure required to support the projects, including the establishment of guidelines and policies, uniform methods, standard questionnaires to be used by all of the centers, and a standard format for submission of data to the Informatics Center. Cancer patients and their family members have been invited to enroll and be included in a pool of potential study participants. The Information Technology Group is responsible for support of the design, implementation, and maintenance of the multicenter Network-wide research protocols. RESULTS: As of January 2004, the CGN contained data on 23,995 probands (participants) and 425,798 family members. As a resource for cancer genetic studies, the CGN has a large number of probands and first-degree relatives with and without cancer and with multiple ethnicities. Different study designs can be used including case-control, case-case, and family studies. CONCLUSIONS: The unique resources of the CGN are available for studies on cancer genetic susceptibility, translational research, and behavioral research. The CGN is now at a point where approved collaborators may have access to enrolled patients and their families for special studies, as well as to the clinical, environmental and family cancer history data banked in the Informatics Center.

Female↗

Cancer genetics of sporadic colorectal cancer: BRAF and PI3KCA mutations, their impact on signaling and novel targeted therapies.

Novel activating mutations in sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) have recently been identified on major kinase encoding genes such as BRAF and PI3KCA. The presence of these activating point mutations, including the well characterized KRAS oncogene mutations, represent up to 75% of cases in CRC. These genes, that have been implicated in the adenoma-carcinoma transition, cause deregulation and constitutive activation of the MAP AKT/kinase pathways, rendering growth advantages to colon tumor cells. This review focuses on the key genetic alterations underlying the cumulative effect of multiple mutations within the colon cancer cell. Moreover, the currently available and alternative treatment approaches that may target these different genetic alterations are discussed, such as the novel BRAF inhibitor. Identification of novel mutations as well as differential gene expression analyzed by microarray reveal potential targets for combined therapeutic protocols which will result in personalized treatments in the near future.

Animals↗