Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “CONTACT LENSES”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

The effect of Acanthamoeba concentration on adherence to four types of unworn soft contact lenses.

Contact lens wear is a predominant risk factor for Acanthamoeba keratitis. The exact nature of the relationship between organism concentration and contact lens adherence is poorly understood. We investigated the effect of Acanthamoeba inoculation concentration on adherence to four categories of contact lenses of varying polymers and water content. Acanthamoeba polyphaga was harvested in log growth phase at 5 days subculture and suspended in PBS at concentrations of 1 x 10(2), 10(3), 10(4), 10(5), and 10(6) organisms/mL (trophozoite:cyst ratio 90:10 +/- 2). Sterile unworn polymacon, etafilcon, lidofilcon, and bufilcon contact lens segments were exposed to Acanthamoeba for 2 hours. Acanthamoeba adherence was quantified using phase contrast microscopy. For all lens types, trophozoite adherence increased as the concentration of inoculum increased, but the relationship was not directly proportional. In all cases the minimal adherence was observed at 10(2). Trophozoite adherence increased disproportionate to cysts for all contact lens types. The greatest adherence was to lidofilcon lenses. At all concentrations adherence was greater to lidofilcon than etafilcon or polymacon, and greater to bufilcon than etafilcon or polymacon at the P < 0.01 level. Adherence was significantly greater to lidofilcon than bufilcon only at 1 x 10(5) and 10(6); P < 0.05 (ANOVA). This study suggests that adherence of A. polyphaga to contact lenses increases with the number of organisms in the inoculum, but the relationship is not directly proportional. The number of adherent organisms varies by contact lens type, with the greatest adherence to lidofilcon and the least to etafilcon lenses.

Acanthamoeba↗
PubMed1997

[Contact lenses. 1: Contact lens associated complications].

The contactology as frontier between ophthalmology and eye optics requires special attention by part of ophthalmologists. Contact lenses influence the anatomy, the physiology and the immunological responses of the external eye. The corneal metabolic disorders of contact lens wearers are among others, the result of a diminished oxygen supply to the cornea. These disorders are influenced by contact lens deposits, tear film dysfunction and intrinsical characteristics of contact lenses. Sensibilisation and allergic reactions are result of the wearing of contact lenses. Even toxic reactions, as a result of the disinfection systems used, may be observed Ophthalmologists must be able to recognize the contact lens induced diseases and to advice their patients properly. Therefore, regular ophthalmological control examinations are indispensable.

Conjunctival Diseases↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Disposable contact lenses vs. contact lens maintenance for extended wear.

We compared a disposable extended wear contact lens modality with conventional extended wear over a 6-week period. To do so, we refit 31 patients who had successfully worn conventional extended wear contact lenses for more than 1 year. One eye was fit with the AcuvueR disposable contact lens, and a new extended wear lens of the type the patient had been wearing was placed on the other eye. At weekly intervals the disposable lens was discarded and a new disposable lens inserted. At the same time, the conventional lens on the fellow eye was cleaned, disinfected, and reinserted. After 6 weeks the ocular response, subjective impressions, and condition of the lenses in the two eyes were compared. Both lenses were then cultured. Three subjects had to discontinue disposable lens wear because of adverse reactions to trapped cellular debris and corneal microcysts. Although the results were not statistically significant, the Acuvue lens appeared to perform better than or equal to the conventional lens in biomicroscopic observation, visual acuity measurement, and subjective patient preference. Eighty-seven percent of patients preferred to continue with the disposable system. There were no differences found in the type or degree of microbial contamination of the lenses.

Bacteria↗
PubMed1975

Comparison of soflens contact lenses (polymacon) with hard contact lenses and spectacles.

A study, comparing Soflens TM contact lenses (polymacon) with hard contact lenses and spectacles, and using 150 male and female patients, has been done. Volunteers qualified for the study if they had healthy eyes and had worn one type of corrective lenses for six months before they were interviewed and examined. During each patient's examination, his type of correction was not known. Such matters as visual acuity, corneal measurements and average wearing time were considered. (Soflens contact lenses were felt to be safer than hard contact lenses.)

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Initial comfort of lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel contact lenses versus etafilcon A contact lenses for extended wear.

PURPOSE: To compare the initial comfort afforded by silicone hydrogel lenses (lotrafilcon A) versus the comfort afforded by conventional hydrogel lenses (etafilcon A) in extended wear (EW). DESIGN: Prospective, double-masked and randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Lotrafilcon A and etafilcon A contact lenses were eye randomly fitted on an EW basis for 7 days and nights in 20 subjects. A forced-choice subject preference questionnaire was made. Subjects were comfort, dryness, red eye and visual quality after night wear and at the end of the day. Subjective scored satisfaction (scale: 1-5) and lens preference were assessed. RESULTS: Lotrafilcon A proved more comfortable after night wear (60%, CI95% 38-82%) and at the end of the day (70%, CI95% 49-90%) than etafilcon A after night wear (10%, CI95% 0-23%, P<0.05) and at the end of the day (20%, CI95% 2-38%, P<0.05). The feeling of dryness was more marked with etafilcon A after night wear (50%, CI95% 27-72%) and at the end of the day (50%, CI95% 27-72%) than it was with lotrafilcon A (15%, CI95% 0%-31%) after night wear (P>0.05) and at the end of the day (25%, CI95% 5%-44%, P<0.05). General satisfaction with the lotrafilcon A lens was 3.65 points (CI95% 3-4.2) and with etafilcon A 2.95 points (CI95% 2.5-3.3, P<0.05). Eighty percent (CI95% 62%-98%) of subjects preferred lotrafilcon A (P<0.05) for EW. CONCLUSIONS: In EW, lotrafilcon A contact lenses were more comfortable and led to less dryness after night wear and at the end of the day than etafilcon A contact lenses.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Corneal epithelial permeability during extended wear of disposable contact lenses versus daily wear of soft contact lenses.

AIMS: The corneal epithelial permeability during extended wear of disposable contact lenses was compared with that during daily wear of soft contact lenses. The study was performed to verify whether the extended wear of disposable contact lenses would result in a higher permeability value than the daily wear of soft contact lenses. A higher permeability makes the cornea more vulnerable for bacterial infections and thus could explain the higher incidence of bacterial keratitis found in extended wear of disposable contact lenses in comparison with the daily wear of soft contact lenses. METHOD: The corneal epithelial permeability was determined by fluorophotometry in 33 healthy volunteers after the wear of soft, daily wear contact lenses for at least 6 months. Thereafter the determination was repeated in each volunteer after extended wear of disposable contact lenses for 1 month. The permeability in 34 healthy non-contact lens wearing volunteers was determined as a control. The permeability value was calculated from the amount of fluorescein that passed into the cornea after application by means of an eyebath. RESULTS: The mean permeability values after daily and extended wear were 0.032 nm/s and 0.031 nm/s, respectively. The values were not significantly different (Wilcoxon paired test p > 0.5). The mean permeability for the non-contact lens wearing controls was 0.042 nm/s. CONCLUSION: The results do not sustain the explanation that a difference in permeability value is the main cause of the increased incidence of keratitis during extended wear of disposable contact lenses in comparison with daily wear.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Microbial flora of tears of orthokeratology patients, and microbial contamination of contact lenses and contact lens accessories.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine if there are changes in the ocular flora of overnight orthokeratology (ortho-k) patients, and the levels of contamination of their lenses and lens accessories, and to correlate compliance with levels of contamination. METHOD: Normal ocular flora of 41 subjects was determined twice before commencing ortho-k lens wear by culture of the lower conjunctiva. Further specimens were collected on six follow-up visits after beginning lens wear, as were samples from their lenses, cases, and suction holders. A questionnaire on lens care was administered after the fifth visit. RESULTS: Three subjects provided conjunctival samples yielding Staphylococcus aureus on one occasion before lens wear, one being positive for this organism after beginning lens wear. Of 38 subjects yielding no growth or only normal eye flora before use, 28 remained free of ocular pathogens after beginning lens wear. Only four subjects had positive cultures on more than one occasion after lens wear. There was no significant difference in isolation levels of pathogens with lens wear (p = 0.423). Lens culture of 54% of subjects yielded no growth or normal flora only; lenses of 16 subjects yielded potential pathogens, including three subjects contaminated on more than one occasion. Lens isolates did not match the organisms transiently colonizing the eye. Lens case, the most frequently contaminated item, was associated with lens contamination (p < 0.001), the same organism being isolated from both items in 11 subjects. Lens suction holder was less frequently contaminated. Neither lens case nor suction holder contamination was associated with isolates from the eye. Reported good compliance correlated with lack of contamination in all but one subject. The most frequent breaches in the lens care protocol were failure to clean, disinfect, and replace the lens case. CONCLUSION: Ocular flora was not altered by ortho-k lens wear over an extended period, and patients remained free of infection. Contaminants identified were generally of a transient nature. Most patients had significant contamination of at least one item, most frequently the lens case. Lens case isolates were significantly associated with those from the lens. The majority of patients reporting good compliance had low or no contamination of their lenses and accessories.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

An investigation of the actual conditions of use of daily-disposable soft contact lenses and two-week disposable soft contact lenses.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether daily-disposable and 2-week disposable soft contact lenses are being used correctly. METHODS: The number of purchases made and brands selected by the 44,566 consumers who purchased daily-disposable and 2-week disposable soft contact lenses in Okada Eye Clinic institutions between April 1, 2002 and November 1, 2002 were monitored. From the 7,759 respondents to a survey conducted in the clinic between November 1, 2002 and March 31, 2003, the number of purchases made and brands selected by the 1,584 respondents, whose sales records could be traced, were analyzed in further detail. RESULTS: The total number of consumers purchasing daily-disposable soft contact lenses was 14,909, and their annual average purchase was 10.56 boxes. Most purchases were of two boxes followed by purchases of four and then six. Only 6.4% of consumers purchased 24 boxes at a time. Consumers purchasing four or fewer boxes at a time accounted for 37.8%. A total of 25,705 consumers purchased 2-week disposable soft contact lenses, with an annual average purchase of 6.37 boxes per consumer. Nineteen percent of the consumers purchased eight boxes of 2-week disposable soft contact lenses per year. Most consumers tended to purchase their contact lenses in even numbers for daily-disposable and 2-week disposable soft contact lenses. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care (Jacksonville, FL) was the most popular manufacturer. According to the survey, 86.6% of the 2-week disposable soft contact lens wearers followed instructions correctly, whereas 13.4% did not. That is, they exceeded the instructed 14 days of wear. CONCLUSIONS: Annual average purchases of daily-disposable and 2-week disposable soft contact lenses tended to be in even numbers and showed differences in their sales depending on contact lens brands. The results obtained from the survey and the actual sales records correlated.

Contact Lens Solutions↗