Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Binomial Distribution”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Use of the beta-binomial distribution in dominant-lethal testing for "weak mutagenic activity: part 2.

Experiments in Dominant-Lethal Testing have been simulated on the computer to estimate the type I error rates and the power of the Beta-Binomial test under various models. (1) The mating ratio is one; and p, the probability that an implant will die, is distributed over the couples. (2) The mating ratio is larger than one; and p is distributed over the males, the females mated to the same male being binomial observations of the value p supplied by the male. (3) The mating ratio is larger than one; and p is distributed over the females. The average rates of dead implants have been set at 0.08 and 0.10 for the control and treatment groups, respectively, and a nominal level of significance equal to 0.05 has been chosen. The type I error rate of the traditional chi-square test has also been estimated. A by-product of these simulations is the behaviour of the estimates alpha and beta of the beta-distribution parameters, which discloses that, in the actual experiments with mice, p is distributed over the females. Our results lead to the recommendations that, for a given number of animals per group, a mating ratio larger than one should be adopted and that the males should be considered as the experimental units for the calculations. With 300 and 450 animals per group, average powers of 0.72 and 0.85 are reached, respectively, for the chosen increment of 2% in the rate of dead implants. Under these models, the type I error rate of the traditional chi-square test may grow to 0.30 for the nominal level of 0.05.

Genes, Dominant↗

Estimation bias using the beta-binomial distribution in teratology.

Kupper et al. (1986, Biometrics 42, 85-98) considered the fitting of dose-response regressions to litter proportions in teratology experiments. They found that the estimators which maximise the beta-binomial likelihood become biased when the intralitter correlation is incorrectly assumed to be homogeneous. This paper considers the nature of this bias and its implications for the analysis of litter proportions in toxicology.

Animals↗

The analysis of chromosomally aberrant cells based on beta-binomial distribution.

Analysis carried out here generalized on earlier studies of chromosomal aberrations in the populations of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, by allowing extrabinomial variation in aberrant cell counts corresponding to within-subject correlations in cell aberrations. Strong within-subject correlations were detected with corresponding standard errors for the average number of aberrant cells that were often substantially larger than was previously assumed. The extrabinomial variation is accommodated in the analysis in the present report, as described in the section on dose-response models, by using a beta-binomial (beta-B) variance structure. It is emphasized that we have generally satisfactory agreement between the observed and the beta-B fitted frequencies by city-dose category. The chromosomal aberration data considered here are not extensive enough to allow a precise discrimination between competing dose-response models.

Chromosome Aberrations↗

[The result-sequence method (sequence analysis) in leptospira research. 3. Communication: The bilateral sequential test (de Boer, Armitage) for testing the difference of mean values of two binomial distributions (author's transl)].

The influence of the liver-activated and non-activated cytostatic drug Cyclophosphamid on the respiration of Leptospira biflexa semaranga Veldrat S 173 was tested in three different concentrations by group-sequential testing of two relative frequencies in a two-sided test-reading. The conditioned probability theta = 0.82 results from thetan = 0.40 and thetaa = 0.75. On account of a practicable sample size, we choose theta' = 0.80 (activated form superior) and theta'' = 0.20 (non-activated form superior). The test-adjusted level of significance is alpha = 0.05 less than beta = 0.10. The expected values for the number of discordant pairs are Etheta' = Etheta'' = 13, Etheta = 1/1 = 14 and Ethetamax = 16. The acceptance inspection performed by control chart and tabulated reference figures results - in comparison with conventional procedures - in savings of discordant pairs of 65 per cent (concentration 10(-4) g/ml) in a decision in favour of activated form, of 65 per cent (concentration 10(-8) g/ml) in an equal efficiency of both states of Cyclophosphamid and of 10 per cent (concentration 10(-11) g/ml) in a non-significant difference. Taking into consideration all unrestrictedly selected pairs, the duration of the experiment takes only 4.25 months instead of 6.75 if the statistical data analysis is not performed conventionally, but group-sequentially instead.

Cyclophosphamide↗