Search PubMedSearch

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Atrophic acne scar”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Evidence-based insights into medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Breast reduction relieves the physical and psychosocial burden of macromastia. Medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty may enhance vascular reliability, preserve nipple-areola complex (NAC) sensation, and sustain upper pole fullness, even in large-volume reductions. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of medial pedicle breast reduction. METHODS: A search across ScienceDirect, Cochrane, and PubMed was conducted. Included studies reported on perioperative outcomes and complications of medial pedicle breast reduction. Data on demographics, surgical variables, complications, sensory recovery, volumetric changes, and patient satisfaction were extracted. Proportion meta-analysis was performed, and odds ratios were calculated for comparison with inferior pedicle breast reduction. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies comprising 1033 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean BMI ranged from 27 to 42 kg/m2, with mean resection weights between 412 and 3828 g. Mean surgical times ranged from 104 to 204 min. Pooled complication rates were low: infection 1%, seroma 1%, hematoma 1%, fat necrosis 2%, NAC necrosis 1%, dehiscence 8%, and reintervention 5%. Odds of complications did not differ significantly from inferior pedicle reductions. NAC sensation typically recovered by 6-12 months, with no long-term deficits. Volumetric analyses demonstrated stable breast shape after the first postoperative year, with superior upper pole tissue maintained. Patient satisfaction ranged 75-100%, with higher ratings for scar appearance and overall aesthetics in medial pedicle reductions. CONCLUSION: Medial pedicle breast reduction is a well-established and reproducible technique, preserving NAC sensation, achieving stable long-term shape, and enhancing upper pole fullness. It offers satisfactory aesthetic outcomes compared to other traditional methods, even in large-volume reductions.

Humans

Posterior Segment Risk Factors for Penetrating Keratoplasty Failure.

PURPOSE: To analyze the relationship between intraoperative and postpenetrating keratoplasty (PK) posterior segment variables and PK graft survival. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical cohort study. SUBJECTS: Patients undergoing PK between May 1, 2007 and September 1, 2018 at a single tertiary center. METHODS: Chart review for PKs performed was conducted, and the first PK completed at the institution for each patient was included for analysis. Data collected included demographics, medical and ocular history, preoperative and intraoperative findings, and intraoperative and postoperative posterior segment factors (pars plana vitrectomy [PPV], endolaser, retinal detachment [RD], and vitreous hemorrhage [VH]). After univariable analysis, variables were selected for multivariable Cox regression analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Graft failure, defined as irreversible and visually significant corneal edema, haze, or scarring. RESULTS: Eight hundred and thirty-five eyes of 835 patients were included. Mean age was 57.1 ± 22.0 (range: 0-100) years, and mean time from PK to final follow-up or graft failure was 3.2 ± 2.9 (range: 0.01-16.1) years. Graft failure occurred in 35.0% of cases with a mean onset of 1.9 ± 2.0 (range: 0.04-11.4) years after PK. After multivariable analysis, 9 variables had significant associations with failure. Two posterior segment variables were significant: intraoperative VH at the time of PK (hazard ratio [HR] 6.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-27.7, P = .010) and silicone oil (SO) tamponade after the PK (HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.4-7.4, P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: Graft failure is a serious complication of PK. VH at the time of the PK and SO tamponade after the PK were associated with graft failure. In complex eyes that are undergoing PK grafts and that may also require posterior segment interventions, these findings may guide patient counseling and discussion of graft prognosis.

Humans

Nerve injury in revision total elbow arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Revision total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is technically demanding and carries a substantial risk of postoperative neurological complications because of scarring, altered anatomy, implant removal, and repeated humeral and ulnar exposure. The incidence, nerve distribution, and recovery profile of nerve injury after revision TEA remain incompletely defined. This study aimed to systematically review the literature to define the incidence, recovery profile, and risk factors for nerve injury after revision TEA. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidance. Thirteen retrospective case series were included, comprising 282 revision TEAs in 271 patients. Random-effects meta-analysis of proportions was undertaken where the data permitted. The primary outcome was postoperative nerve injury following revision TEA. Secondary outcomes included nerve type, recovery, secondary nerve-related procedures, infection, triceps insufficiency, metallosis, periprosthetic fracture, and re-revision. RESULTS: The pooled incidence of postoperative nerve injury was 22.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.3 to 29.6; I2 = 34.6%). The crude incidence was 60 of 282 revisions (21.3%, 95% CI 16.6 to 26.5). The ulnar nerve was involved in 66.7% of all nerve injuries, the radial nerve in 31.7%, and the median nerve in 1.7%. No significant difference in pooled nerve-injury incidence was identified between studies published before 2010 and those published from 2010 onwards (22.9% vs. 21.4%, P = .837). Recovery reporting was heterogeneous; among injuries with numerically extractable outcomes, 85.4% improved partially or completely (95% CI 72.2 to 93.9). Secondary nerve-related procedures were reported in 7 studies. Pooled complication estimates were 10.2% for infection, 13.6% for triceps insufficiency, 25.5% for metallosis, 15.9% for periprosthetic fracture, and 14.0% for re-revision. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative nerve injury is a common and clinically important complication of revision TEA, affecting approximately 1 in 5 cases. The ulnar nerve is most frequently involved, although radial nerve injury accounts for a substantial proportion of cases. Many neuropathies improve during follow-up, but persistent deficits and the need for secondary nerve-related procedures are not uncommon. Future studies should adopt standardized neurological definitions and reporting to improve comparability and guide preventive surgical strategies.

Humans