SEARCH · Search PubMed
Results for “Anesthesia, Obstetrical”
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
[Evaluation of obstetrical anesthesia methods].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Technics of obstetrical anesthesia.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Resident training in obstetric anesthesia in the United States.
BACKGROUND: Limited information exists on obstetric anesthesia experience and training within residency training programs in the United States. METHODS: A survey was sent to every academic anesthesiology training program in the United States (n=120), with follow-up reminders to non-responders. The survey included 14 questions divided into staffing, didactic teaching and epidemiology regarding the practice of obstetric anesthesia at each academic institution. RESULTS: A response rate of 78% (93/120) was achieved. The returned surveys were grouped into three tiers by the number of deliveries/year from the lowest (Group 1) to the highest (Group 3). The total number of obstetric deliveries at each institution ranged from 340 to 15 800. The average number of residents/month rotating on obstetric anesthesia was 2.6 and the number of months spent on the obstetric anesthesia service was 2.7. The average number of obstetric anesthesia lectures given was 12 per month. A total of 21.5 obstetric anesthesia fellows were reported to train at these institutions, with fellows being more common in larger institutions. Group 1 institutions were more likely to have anesthesiologists covering the main operating room and obstetric suite simultaneously. The average number of obstetric anesthesia staff members/institution was 4.3. The average cesarean section rate was 27.8%, with 5.8% being performed under general anesthesia. Neuraxial techniques were used in an average of 70.3% of laboring parturients, with combined spinal epidurals accounting for 24.6% of the techniques. CONCLUSION: The average number of obstetric deliveries per year for institutions with a resident training program was 3498+/-2383. Dedicated obstetric anesthesia staffing was more common when >3700 deliveries/year were performed; the presence of this staffing corresponded with a reduction in the use of general anesthesia for cesarean deliveries. Few differences in the resident lecture didactic exposure were observed in terms of numbers of lectures and months on the obstetric anesthesia service, although a significantly greater number of clinical cases was available to each resident in those institutions with greater overall numbers of obstetric cases.
Obstetric anesthesia: a national survey.
To assess obstetric anesthesia in the United States, and to determine why more anesthesia personnel are not involved in this subspecialty, a questionnaire was sent to the heads of obstetric and anesthesia services in 1,200 hospitals. Both obstetric and anesthesia respondents agreed on several characteristics of obstetric anesthesia that inhibit more participation by anesthesia personnel. Among others, they identified that: the unpredictability of labor and delivery makes scheduling difficult; obstetricians tend to dictate type and timing of anesthesia; the risk of malpractice claims is increased for obstetric anesthesia; and, finally, larger obstetric services would make it more practical to provide anesthesia services. Regarding availability of personnel and procedures, obstetric units with less than 500 deliveries per year were considerably more under-staffed than the larger units in most areas studied. When general anesthesia was used for cesarean section in these units, it was provided by, or given under the direction of, an anesthesiologist only 44% of the time, whereas in the hospitals with more than 1,500 deliveries per year, an anesthesiologist was present 86% of the time. Likewise, in the small units, personnel classified as "others" were responsible for newborn resuscitation in 24% and 43% of instances after cesarean section and vaginal delivery, respectively. In the hospitals with more than 1,500 deliveries, comparable figures were 4% and 2%, respectively.
Obstetric anesthesia practice in Canada.
PURPOSE: To describe obstetric anesthesia in Canada as practiced in 1997: to identify practices at variance with the literature and the opinions of experts: and to identify questions for future research. METHODS: In 1997, a detailed postal questionnaire asking about the practice of obstetric anesthesia was mailed to all 1,539 specialist anesthesiologist members of the Canadian Anaesthetists' Society residing in Canada. Nonresponders were mailed a second questionnaire three months later RESULTS: There were 865 completed questionnaires returned for analysis (56.2%). Of these, 522 anesthesiologists practiced obstetric anesthesia (60.3%). The data were subdivided into those from anesthesiologists with a full or part-time university based practice (40.1%) and those from a community based practice (59.9%). University based and community-based anesthesiologists have very similar patterns of practice. Specific areas where anesthesia practice was different from current recommendations included: (1) information provided when obtaining consent for labour epidural analgesia, (2) use of opioids and local anesthetics for initiation of epidural analgesia, (3) use of coagulation testing in preeclampsia, (4) the common use of cutting spinal needles, (5) use of neuraxial morphine and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents after Cesarean deliveries, (6) optimal treatment of neuraxial opioid side effects, (7) when to insert an endotracheal tube for general anesthesia after delivery, and (8) withdrawing epidural catheters through epidural needles. CONCLUSIONS: This survey presents reference data on the practice of obstetric anesthesia in Canada in 1997. Anesthesiologists with university affiliation have very similar practices to those without university affiliations.
A changing trend in obstetric anesthesia; four year report.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Cerebrospinal fluid pressures during labor and obstetrical anesthesia.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Use of halothane (fluothane) in obstetric anesthesia: preliminary report.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
[Obstetrical anesthesia in Sweden in 1957].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
[PROSPECTS AND NEEDS IN OBSTETRICAL ANESTHESIA].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Terminal obstetrical anesthesia by means of lumbar sympathetic paravertebral block.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Hypotension during obstetrical anesthesia.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A clinical appraisal of 2-chloroprocaine in continuous caudal obstetrical anesthesia.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
[Considerations on the risks of obstetrical anesthesia in munipal maternity hospitals. Preferred anesthesia].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA FOR SPECIAL PROBLEMS.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
[PROBLEMS IN OBSTETRICAL ANESTHESIA].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.