Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ARTHROPODS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

The immunomodulatory factors of arthropod saliva and the potential for these factors to serve as vaccine targets to prevent pathogen transmission.

In general, attempts to develop vaccines for pathogens transmitted by arthropods have met with little or no success. It has been widely observed that the saliva of arthropods that transmit disease enhances the infectivity of pathogens the arthropod transmits to the vertebrate host. Indeed, it has been observed that vaccinating against components of the saliva of arthropods or against antigens expressed in the gut of arthropods can protect the host from infection and decrease the viability of the arthropod. These results suggest that multi-subunit vaccines that target the pathogen itself as well as arthropod salivary gland components and arthropod gut antigens may be the most effective at controlling arthropod-borne pathogens as these vaccines would target several facets of the lifecycle of the pathogen. This review covers known immunomodulators in arthropod salivary glands, instances when arthropod saliva has been shown to enhance infection and a limited number of examples of antiarthropod vaccines, with emphasis on three arthropods: sandflies, mosquitoes and hard ticks.

Animals↗

Impacts of major predators on tropical agroforest arthropods: comparisons within and across taxa.

In food web studies, taxonomically unrelated predators are often grouped into trophic levels regardless of their relative importance on prey assemblages, multiple predator effects, or interactions such as omnivory. Ants and birds are important predators likely to differentially shape arthropod assemblages, but no studies have compared their effects on a shared prey base. In two separate studies, we excluded birds and ants from branches of a canopy tree ( Inga micheliana) in a coffee farm in Mexico for 2 months in the dry and wet seasons of 2002. We investigated changes in arthropod densities with and without predation pressure from (1) birds and (2) ant assemblages dominated by one of two ant species ( Azteca instabilis and Camponotus senex). We first analyzed individual effects of each predator (birds, Azteca instabilis, and C. senex) then used a per day effect metric to compare differences in effects across (birds vs ants) and within predator taxa (the two ant species). Individually, birds reduced densities of total and large arthropods and some arthropod orders (e.g., spiders, beetles, roaches) in both seasons. Azteca instabilis did not significantly affect arthropods (total, small, large or specific orders). Camponotus senex, however, tended to remove arthropods (total, small), especially in the dry season, and affected arthropod densities of some orders both positively and negatively. Predators greatly differed in their effects on Inga arthropods (for all, small, large, and individual orders of arthropods) both in sign (+/-) and magnitudes of effects. Birds had stronger negative effects on arthropods than ants and the two dominant ant species had stronger effects on arthropods in different seasons. Our results show that aggregating taxonomically related and unrelated predators into trophic levels without prior experimental data quantifying the sign and strengths of effects may lead to a misrepresentation of food web interactions.

Animals↗

[Soil arthropod communities in different successional tropical secondary forests in Xishuangbanna].

Studies on the soil arthropod community structure and its seasonal variation in four types of secondary forest, including Macaranga denticulate forest (Md), Millettia laptobotrya forest (Ml), Musa acuminata forest (Ma) and Dendrocalamus membranaceae forest (Dm) in Xishuangbanna showed that Acari, Hymenoptera (ant) and Collembola were the dominant groups of soil arthropods on all study sites, but their proportions differed in different forests. For the common and rare groups of soil arthropods, there were some differences in four forests. We found fewer taxonomic groups (number of order), individuals and DG diversity index of soil arthropod communities in Dm secondary forest, as compared to another three forest types. There was no significant difference in number of groups and individuals and DG diversity index of soil arthropods among Md, Ml and Ma. The taxonomic diversity and population of soil arthropods were higher in top soil (0-5 cm) than in deeper layers. The research indicated that the dynamics of soil arthropods was correlated with the fluctuation of temperature and rainfall in this area. In general, the groups, populations and DG diversity index of soil arthropod communities were higher in dry season or early rainy season than in middle rainy season. There were some differences in the seasonal variation of soil arthropod communities in different type forests, which was primarily related to precipitation, temperature, litter quantity and quality, and biology of different soil arthropods. Apparently, food, habitation and disturb also have effects on the seasonal variation of soil arthropod communities in different forests.

Animals↗

Arthropods in dermatology.

Arthropods are important in medicine for a multitude of reasons. Their bites and stings may induce allergic reactions, ranging from annoying to life-threatening. Many arthropod products are also capable of inciting allergic responses in sensitized persons. In recent years, bites and stings have gained greater attention owing to increased concern about disease transmission. A common hypersensitivity response to arthropod bites, stings, and products is papular urticaria. This eruption occurs primarily in children, who eventually "outgrow" this disease, probably through desensitization after multiple arthropod exposures. Papular urticaria is most often caused by fleas or bedbugs, but virtually any arthropod is capable of inducing such a reaction. Two arthropod classes of medical importance are the Arachnida (spiders, scorpions, ticks, and mites) and the Insecta (lice, fleas, bedbugs, flies, bees, and ants). Animals in these two classes are probably responsible for more morbidity and mortality worldwide than are any other group of venomous creatures. In general, the diagnosis of arthropod bites and stings is dependent on maintenance of a high index of suspicion and familiarity with the arthropod fauna not only in one's region of practice, but also in the travel regions of one's patients. Learning objective At the completion of this learning activity, participants should be familiar with the clinical manifestations caused by a variety of arthropods as well as the treatment and possible sequelae of arthropod attacks.

Animals↗

Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals.

The arthropods constitute the most diverse animal group, but, despite their rich fossil record and a century of study, their phylogenetic relationships remain unclear. Taxa previously proposed to be sister groups to the arthropods include Annelida, Onychophora, Tardigrada and others, but hypotheses of phylogenetic relationships have been conflicting. For example, onychophorans, like arthropods, moult periodically, have an arthropod arrangement of haemocoel, and have been related to arthropods in morphological and mitochondrial DNA sequence analyses. Like annelids, they possess segmental nephridia and muscles that are a combination of smooth and obliquely striated fibres. Our phylogenetic analysis of 18S ribosomal DNA sequences indicates a close relationship between arthropods, nematodes and all other moulting phyla. The results suggest that ecdysis (moulting) arose once and support the idea of a new clade, Ecdysozoa, containing moulting animals: arthropods, tardigrades, onychophorans, nematodes, nematomorphs, kinorhynchs and priapulids. No support is found for a clade of segmented animals, the Articulata, uniting annelids with arthropods. The hypothesis that nematodes are related to arthropods has important implications for developmental genetic studies using as model systems the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and the arthropod Drosophila melanogaster, which are generally held to be phylogenetically distant from each other.

Animals↗

Ecology of interactions between weeds and arthropods.

Weeds and arthropods interact in agricultural systems. Weeds can directly serve as food sources or provide other ecosystem resources for herbivorous arthropods, and indirectly serve carnivorous (beneficial) arthropods by providing food and shelter to their prey. Weeds can serve as alternative hosts for pest and beneficial arthropods when their preferred crop host is absent. Herbivory on crops by pest arthropods reduces the competitive ability of crop plants, leading to increased weed growth. Interactions between weeds and arthropods have several implications to integrated pest management (IPM). Pest and beneficial arthropod populations can be maintained in the absence of crop hosts. This statement also applies to all other pests that use weeds as a food source, including pathogens, nematodes, mollusks, and vertebrates. Weeds outside crop fields that maintain overwintering populations of arthropod pests are the major reason for the development of area-wide IPM programs for certain mobile arthropod pests. Weeds can serve as a source of increased diversity in agroecosystems. Increased diversity has been the rationale for enhancing biological control of arthropod pests through habitat management. The consequences of such approaches are difficult to predict on a multispecies IPM basis.

Animals↗

Plant genetic determinants of arthropod community structure and diversity.

To test the hypothesis that genes have extended phenotypes on the community, we quantified how genetic differences among cottonwoods affect the diversity, abundance, and composition of the dependent arthropod community. Over two years, five major patterns were observed in both field and common-garden studies that focused on two species of cottonwoods and their naturally occurring F1 and backcross hybrids (collectively referred to as four different cross types). We did not find overall significant differences in arthropod species richness or abundance among cottonwood cross types. We found significant differences in arthropod community composition among all cross types except backcross and narrowleaf cottonwoods. Thus, even though we found similar richness among cross types, the species that composed the community were significantly different. Using vector analysis, we found that the shift in arthropod community composition was correlated with percent Fremont alleles in the host plant, which suggests that the arthropod community responds to the underlying genetic differences among trees. We found 13 arthropod species representing different trophic levels that were significant indicators of the four different cross types. Even though arthropod communities changed in species composition from one year to the next, the overall patterns of community differences remained remarkably stable, suggesting that the genetic differences among cross types exert a strong organizing influence on the arthropod community. Together, these results support the extended phenotype concept. Few studies have observationally and experimentally shown that entire arthropod communities can be structured by genetic differences in their host plants. These findings contribute to the developing field of community genetics and suggest a strategy for conserving arthropod diversity by promoting genetic diversity in their host plants.

Animals↗

[Effects of Bacillus thuringiensis transgenic rice and chemical insecticides on arthropod communities in paddy-fields].

This paper assessed the effects of cry1Abl/cry1Ac-carrying transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis rice (Bt rice) and chemical insecticides on the arthropod communities under paddy-field conditions in terms of arthropod guild dominance, family composition and dominance distribution of each guild, individuals of each guild, some common indices of arthropod communities, and community dissimilarity. In most cases, no significant differences were found between the Bt and control rice plots without any chemical insecticide spray in such arthropod community specific parameters as guild dominance, family composition and dominance distribution, temporal dynamics of the individuals of each guild or all arthropod, as well as some common community indices (including species richness, Shannon-Wiener diversity index, evenness index and dominant index) and their temporal dynamics. The similarity of arthropod community between the Bt and control rice plots were apparently higher. It was clear that Bt rice generally showed no marked negative effect on the arthropod community in paddy field. In contrast, some arthropod community specific parameters such as guild dominances in the control plot with chemical insecticide spray were in some cases markedly and even significantly different from those in the control plot without any chemical insecticide spray. The similarity of arthropod community between the control plots with and without chemical insecticide spray was relatively lower. It could be concluded that the effect of Bt rice on the arthropod community was apparently lower than that of chemical insecticides.

Animals↗

Arthropod-borne tularemia in Japan: clinical analysis of 1,374 cases observed between 1924 and 1996.

Sixteen cases of tularemia transmitted by arthropods are used to characterize arthropod-borne tularemia in Japan. Arthropod-borne tularemia accounted for 1.2% of a total of 1,374 cases of tularemia observed between 1924 and 1996. The number of cases reported in Japan was low when compared with the number of cases reported in the United States. Arthropod-borne tularemia, however, is increasing and has reached 10.1% incidences during the last 16 yr. No arthropod-borne cases were reported prior to 1951. The occurrence of tularemia infection caused by contact with diseased hares was diphasic with the higher peak occurring during the winter, whereas the occurrence of arthropod-borne tularemia was common from spring to autumn. Among the 16 cases that we studied, 5 were initiated by tick-bites, 5 by the crushing of ticks found on domestic dogs, and 1 by an unidentified insect. In the remaining 5 cases, the vectors were not identified although arthropod bites were confirmed. These arthropod-borne cases were observed exclusively in the northeastern area of Honshu, the main island of Japan, and the age of patients ranged from 23 to 74 yr. The arthropod vectors associated with tularemia and factors influencing incidence of arthropod-borne tularemia in Japan are discussed.

Age Factors↗

Containment of arthropod disease vectors.

Effective containment of arthropod vectors of infectious diseases is necessary to prevent transmission of pathogens by released, infected vectors and to prevent vectors that escape from establishing populations that subsequently contribute to increased disease. Although rare, past releases illustrate what can go wrong and justify the need for guidelines that minimize risks. An overview of recommendations for insectary facilities, practices, and equipment is provided, and features of four recently published and increasingly rigorous arthropod containment levels (ACLs 1-4) are summarized. ACL-1 is appropriate for research that constitutes the lowest risk level, including uninfected arthropods or vectors that are infected with micro-organisms that do not cause disease in humans, domestic animals, or wildlife. ACL-2 is appropriate for indigenous and exotic arthropods that represent a moderate risk, including vectors infected or suspected of being infected with biosafety level (BSL)-2 infectious agents and arthropods that have been genetically modified in ways that do not significantly affect their fecundity, survival, host preference, or vector competence. ACL-3 is recommended for arthropods that are or may be infected with BSL-3 infectious agents. ACL-3 places greater emphasis on pathogen containment and more restricted access to the insectary than ACL-2. ACL-4 is intended for arthropods that are infected with the most dangerous BSL-4 infectious agents, which can cause life-threatening illness by aerosol or arthropod bite. Adherence to these guidelines will result in laboratory-based arthropod vector research that minimizes risks and results in important new contributions to applied and basic science.

Animals↗

Evolution of the entire arthropod Hox gene set predated the origin and radiation of the onychophoran/arthropod clade.

BACKGROUND: Dramatic changes in body size and pattern occurred during the radiation of many taxa in the Cambrian, and these changes are best documented for the arthropods. The sudden appearance of such diverse body plans raises the fundamental question of when the genes and the developmental control systems that regulate these designs evolved. As Hox genes regulate arthropod body patterns, the evolution of these genes may have played a role in the origin and diversification of the arthropod body plan from a homonomous ancestor. To trace the origin of arthropod Hox genes, we examined their distribution in a myriapod and in the Onychophora, a sister group to the arthropods. RESULTS: Despite the limited segmental diversity within myriapods and Onychophora, all insect Hox genes are present in both taxa, including the trunk Hox genes Ultrabithorax and abdominal-A as well as an ortholog of the fushi tarazu gene. Comparative analysis of Hox gene deployment revealed that the anterior boundary of expression of trunk Hox genes has shifted dramatically along the anteroposterior axis between Onychophora and different arthropod classes. Furthermore, we found that repression of expression of the Hox target gene Distal-less is unique to the insect lineage. CONCLUSIONS: A complete arthropod Hox gene family existed in the ancestor of the onychophoran/arthropod clade. No new Hox genes were therefore required to catalyze the arthropod radiation; instead, arthropod body-plan diversity arose through changes in the regulation of Hox genes and their downstream targets.

Amino Acid Sequence↗