Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ARTHRODESIS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1989

[Arthrodesis of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the thumb. Indications, technic, arthrodesis angle and functional effect].

The metacarpophalangeal joint of the thumb has less range of motion than any other digital joint. Its stability is more important than its mobility. Thus, arthrodesis of this joint causes relatively little loss of function, provided only that the joint is fused in the correct position. The authors reviewed all MP joint fusions of the thumb which were done at their hospital between 1974 and 1985. They examined individually forty-one of the fifty patients and studied the indications, surgical techniques and difficulties, and the complications. Furthermore, they measured all angles of fusion and concluded that the optimal position is fifteen degrees of flexion and ten degrees of pronation. The use of tension band wiring facilitates the achievement and maintenance of the desired position. The stability of the fusion permits exercise immediately after the operation; this helps to avoid a tenodesis of the long extensor tendon of the thumb.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

[Comparative outcome assessment of the wrist joint--mediocarpal partial arthrodesis and total arthrodesis].

Total wrist fusion still represents the main treatment for severe posttraumatic disorders of the wrist due to longstanding scaphoid nonunion (SNAC-wrist) or scapholunate dissociation (SLAC-wrist). During the last decade, midcarpal fusion has become more and more popular as it preserves motion. The question, however, remained if the preserved motion is of real benefit from a patient point of view, as complete pain relief is rare following this type of limited wrist fusion. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of both treatments with the modified Cooney wrist score and the DASH questionnaire. Between 1993 and 1997, 138 patients with progressive carpal collapse were treated either by midcarpal fusion (97) or total wrist fusion (41). Overall satisfaction was high in both groups with 86% (midcarpal fusion) and 84% (total wrist fusion). The traditional wrist score (70 versus 52 points) and the DASH questionnaire (33 versus 45 points) revealed the superiority of midcarpal fusion. The correlation between the wrist score and the DASH was statistically high (p < 0.001), demonstrating the specificity and validity of the DASH questionnaire. Midcarpal fusion is preferable to total wrist fusion for treatment of progressive carpal collapse (SLAC- and SNAC-wrist). The DASH represents a sensitive tool to evaluate the outcome of salvage procedures for treatment of disorders of the wrist.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

[Scapho-trapezio-trapezoid arthrodesis (triscaphe arthrodesis)].

BACKGROUND: Scapho-trapezio-trapezoid (STT)/triscaphe fusion is used to stabilize the radial column of the wrist. However the reported results are controversial. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 111 patients were treated with STT fusion from 1992 to 1997. Indications were chronic dissociation of the scapholunate joint (n = 15), idiopathic arthrosis of the scaphotrapeziotrapezoid joint (n = 11), Kienböck's disease in advanced stage (n = 84) and dislocation of the trapezium (n = 1). This study reviews the results after an average follow-up period of four years (range, two to eight years). RESULTS: Patients showed an average wrist motion (ROM) in extension and flexion of 81 % of the preoperative range and in radial and ulnar deviation of 68 % of the preoperative range. Preoperative pain values (VAS) were reduced 76 % (non-stress) and 55 % (stress). The average grip strength improved to 65 % of the contra-lateral side. Good results were reached according to the modified Mayo wrist score with a score of 66 points (71 points in arthritis of the STT joint; 62 points in Kienböck's disease, 60 points in SL-dissociation). The patients described low disability in the DASH scores, with an average of 27 points. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that STT fusion is reliable and effective for treatment and pain relief and offers reasonable functional results in the above mentioned indications.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

[Surgical treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis. A comparative study of 3 types of arthrodesis].

The authors present a series of 186 cases of spondylolisthesis treated using 3 different types of arthrodesis: 84 by anterior arthrodesis, 35 by postero-lateral arthrodesis and 67 by combined arthrodesis. Slippage reduction was sought only in combined arthrodesis. The elimination of pain or a significant improvement were noted in 95 per cent of cases treated by anterior arthrodesis, in 74 per cent of those treated by postero-lateral arthrodesis and in 97 per cent of those treated by combined arthrodesis. The work resumption or professional rehabilitation rate was 89 per cent for anterior arthrodesis, 46 per cent for postero-lateral arthrodesis and 90 per cent for combined arthrodesis. Analysis of the clinical results according to the criteria of Stauffer and Coventry shows that good results were noted in 69 per cent of cases treated by anterior arthrodesis, in 43 per cent of those treated by postero-lateral arthrodesis and in 74 per cent of those treated by combined arthrodesis. A fusion rate of 86 per cent was achieved after anterior arthrodesis, 69 per cent after postero-lateral arthrodesis and 95 per cent after combined arthrodesis. Reduction had no effect on either clinical results or spinal statics in spondylolisthesis of less than 50 per cent. In the reduction of spondylolisthesis of more than 50 per cent, better results were obtained with the R. Louis technique than the Harrington technique in the restoration of spinal statics and maintenance of long-term clinical results.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Isolated subtalar arthrodesis.

BACKGROUND: The purposes of this retrospective study were to review the results of isolated subtalar arthrodesis in adults and to identify factors influencing the union rate. The hypotheses were that (1) the overall outcome is acceptable but is not as favorable as previously reported, (2) complication rates, especially the nonunion rate, are higher than previously reported, and (3) factors contributing to a less favorable union rate can be identified. METHODS: Between January 1988 and July 1995, 184 consecutive isolated subtalar arthrodeses were performed in 174 adults (115 men and fifty-nine women) whose average age was forty-three years (range, eighteen to seventy-nine years). Eighty patients (46 percent) were smokers. The indications for the procedure included posttraumatic arthritis after a fracture of the calcaneus (109 feet), a fracture of the talus (thirteen feet), or a subtalar dislocation (thirteen feet); primary subtalar arthritis (thirteen feet); failure of a previous subtalar arthrodesis (twenty-eight feet); and residual congenital deformity (eight feet). Rigid internal fixation with one or two screws was used for all feet. Bone graft was used in 145 feet; the types of graft material included cancellous autograft (ninety-four feet), structural autograft (twenty-nine feet), cancellous allograft (seventeen feet), and structural allograft (five feet). Bone graft was not used in the remaining thirty-nine feet. RESULTS: Clinical and radiographic follow-up examinations were performed for 148 (80 percent) of the 184 feet at an average of fifty-one months (range, twenty-four to 130 months) postoperatively. The average ankle-hindfoot score according to the modified scale of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (maximum possible score, 94 points) improved from 24 points preoperatively to 70 points at follow-up. Thirty feet had clinical evidence of nonunion. The union rate was 84 percent (154 of 184) overall, 86 percent (134 of 156) after primary arthrodesis, and 71 percent (twenty of twenty-eight) after revision arthrodesis. The union rate was 92 percent (ninety-three of 101 feet) for nonsmokers and 73 percent (sixty-one of eighty-three feet) for smokers (p < 0.05). Intraoperative inspection revealed that 42 percent (seventy-eight) of the 184 feet had evidence of more than two millimeters of avascular bone at the subtalar joint; all thirty nonunions occurred in this group (p < 0.05). A nonunion occurred in three of the five feet that had been treated with structural allograft and in two of the six feet in which the subtalar arthrodesis had been performed adjacent to the site of a previous ankle arthrodesis. After elimination of the subgroups of feet in patients who smoked, those that had had a failure of a previous subtalar arthrodesis, those that had been treated with a structural graft, and those that had had the subtalar arthrodesis adjacent to the site of a previous ankle arthrodesis, the union rate improved to 96 percent (seventy-three of seventy-six). Complications other than nonunion included prominent hardware requiring screw removal (thirty-six of 184 feet; 20 percent), lateral impingement (fifteen of 148 feet; 10 percent), symptomatic valgus malalignment (five of 148 feet; 3 percent), symptomatic varus malalignment (four of 148 feet; 3 percent), and infection (five of 184 feet; 3 percent). CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, the present study includes the largest reported series of isolated subtalar arthrodeses in adults. Our results suggest that the outcome following isolated subtalar arthrodesis is not as favorable as has been reported in previous studies. The rate of union was significantly diminished by smoking, the presence of more than two millimeters of avascular bone at the arthrodesis site, and the failure of a previous subtalar arthrodesis (p < 0.05 for all). Other factors that probably affect the union rate include the use of structural allograft and performance of the arthrodesis adjac

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Lumbar laminectomy alone or with instrumented or noninstrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient selection, costs, and surgical outcomes.

DESIGN: A prospective, multicenter observational study. OBJECTIVES: 1) Identify correlates of the decision to perform arthrodesis in patients undergoing laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. 2) Compare symptoms, walking capacity, and satisfaction 6 and 24 months after laminectomy alone and laminectomy with noninstrumented and with instrumented arthrodesis. BACKGROUND DATA: Few prospective studies have compared outcomes of laminectomy alone or laminectomy with noninstrumented or with instrumented arthrodesis in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. There is uncertainty regarding the optimal use of arthrodesis and instrumentation. METHODS: Two hundred seventy--two patients undergoing--surgery for degenerative lumbar stenosis by eight surgeons at four centers were included in the study cohort. Of these, 37 had noninstrumented and 41 had instrumented arthrodesis. Logistic regression identified factors associated with arthrodesis. The principal outcomes-health status, walking capacity, back and leg pain, and satisfaction with surgery-were assessed 6 and 24 months postoperatively with univariate and multivariate techniques. Outcomes also were assessed in a restricted cohort of patients with at least 5 mm spondylolisthesis and/or 15 degrees scoliosis. Hospital costs were obtained from a computerized hospital cost accounting system. RESULTS: The major predictor of the decision to perform arthrodesis was the individual surgeon (P = 0.0001). Noninstrumented arthrodesis was associated with superior relief of low back pain at 6 months (P = 0.004) and 24 months (P = 0.01). This difference persisted in multivariate analyses, with borderline statistical significance. There were no significant differences in the other outcomes across treatment groups. Mean hospital costs of laminectomy alone and noninstrumented and instrumented arthrodesis were $12,615, $18,495, and $25,914, respectively (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Findings were limited by the small number of participating surgeons, modest sample size that produced P values of borderline significance, and nonrandomized design. With these caveats in mind, the authors conclude: (1) The individual surgeon was a more important correlate of the decision to perform arthrodesis than clinical variables such as spondylolisthesis. (2) Noninstrumented arthrodesis resulted in superior relief of back pain after 6 and 24 months. (3) Instrumented arthrodesis was the most costly option. These results highlight the need for randomized controlled trials and cost effectiveness analyses of lumbar arthrodesis and instrumentation in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

[Cup and cone arthrodesis of the thumb in palliative surgery for tetraplegia. Retrospective study of 57 cases].

INTRODUCTION: The cup and cone technique, first described by Carrol and Hill is very simple. It affords excellent contact between bones, and allows all possible adjustments of the arthrodesis in three planes before its final fixation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty seven cup and cone arthrodesis of the thumb were performed in 41 adult tetraplegic patients. Level of arthrodesis was i.p. in 28 cases, TM in 25 cases and MP in 4 cases. Distribution in Giens classification was 3 group 1, 14 group 2, 9 group 3, 23 group 5, 2 group 6, 1 group 7, 2 group 10. Mean follow-up was 51 months. Three criteria were retrospectively studied: the clinical strength of arthrodesis, its position, and the potential existence of complications. RESULTS: Clinical fusion was obtained in 8 week in all cases, without any infection. No delayed union was observed. In only one case, a surgical revision was required, due to initial bad setting of TM arthrodesis and an intermetacarpal arthrodesis was performed with a bony graft. In all other cases, position of arthrodesis was correct. In a few cases, only minor or non specific drawbacks were observed: TM arthrodesis were sometimes painful during the first 6 months postoperatively; transient dystrophy of the thumb nail occurred two times in i.p. arthrodesis; the worst drawback was the shortening of the thumb, which impaired the key-grip in cases where the thumb was preoperatively short. DISCUSSION: In tetraplegic patients, stabilization of the thumb can be obtained either by split distal FPL tenodesis or by an arthrodesis at TM, MP or i.p. level of the thumb. When the provided thumb length is adequate arthrodesis is preferred. The cup and cone technique is very simple and effective. It is fit particularly in tertraplegic patients, whatever the level of the thumb arthrodesis.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Video-assisted lateral intertransverse process arthrodesis. Validation of a new minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion technique in the rabbit and nonhuman primate (rhesus) models.

STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric anatomic and in vivo survival animal studies were performed to develop a new arthrodesis technique for the lumbar spine. OBJECTIVES: To examine the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of a minimally invasive lumbar intertransverse process arthrodesis technique using an osteoinductive growth factor (rhBMP-2) delivered in a collagen sponge carrier. The technique was first developed using a rabbit model and modified for the nonhuman primate (rhesus monkey), a larger animal with the most similar bone biology to humans. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The morbidity of conventional posterolateral lumbar intertransverse process arthrodesis includes graft donor site morbidity; paraspinal muscle devascularization, denervation, and scarring and nonunion in up to 36% of patients. Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody arthrodesis techniques have been developed, but these often require a metal implant and carry risks to major vessels and development of retrograde ejaculation. A minimally invasive technique for posterolateral intertransverse process arthrodesis has not been described previously. METHODS: In Part 1, we examined seven New Zealand white rabbits and five rhesus monkeys at necropsy and during nonsurvival surgeries to determine the best access routes and to develop special instruments for video-assisted lateral intertransverse process arthrodesis. In Part 2, 38 New Zealand white rabbits underwent L4-L5 intertransverse process arthrodesis: the "OPEN" group (n = 16) underwent a standard open muscle-splitting approach using rhBMP-2 (bone morphogenetic protein) and collagen as a bone graft substitute; the "video-assisted control" group (n = 6) underwent video-assisted lateral intertransverse process arthrodesis with the collagen implant only (no growth factor); and the "video-assisted-BMP" group (n = 16) underwent video-assisted lateral intertransverse process arthrodesis with rhBMP-2 and collagen as the graft material. In Part 3, rhesus monkeys (n = 4) underwent video-assisted lateral intertransverse process arthrodesis using rhBMP-2 and collagen after laminectomy of L4-L5. RESULTS: In Part 1, we identified expedient, minimally invasive routes to the intertransverse process interval appropriate for each species: an intermuscular approach for the rabbit and a lateral, extramuscular approach for the rhesus monkey. In Part 2, all rabbits in the OPEN and video-assisted-BMP groups achieved solid intertransverse process lumbar fusions when assessed at 10 weeks. There were no neurologic impairments nor any difference between the two groups in the frequency of postoperative infection or other complications. None of the animals in the video-assisted control group showed evidence of fusion. In Part 3, exposure, decortication and grafting with rh-BMP-2 and collagen was accomplished successfully in all four monkeys through the video-assisted minimally invasive approach without complications. CONCLUSION: Video-assisted lateral intertransverse process arthrodesis is a feasible, effective, and safe method of lumbar spinal fusion in the rabbit and rhesus monkey. Use of this arthrodesis procedure will minimize the morbidity of paraspinal muscle denervation and devascularization seen with open intertransverse process fusion techniques, and the use of an osteoinductive growth factor will eliminate the problem of graft donor site morbidity and possibly increase the chances for successful fusion.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Primary stability of shoulder arthrodesis using cannulated cancellous screws.

There are no biomechanical studies available concerned with the primary stability of shoulder arthrodesis. The aim of our biomechanical investigations was to ascertain a minimal material combination with high primary stability for shoulder arthrodesis. For that purpose, the primary stability of 6 different forms of screw arthrodesis was investigated under the stress of abduction, adduction, anteversion, and retroversion. The mean values of the screw arthrodeses were compared with those of a 16-hole plate arthrodesis. All tests were carried out on 24 human specimens without destruction by use of a materials testing machine. The most stable form of screw arthrodesis for the load directions of abduction, adduction, anteversion, and retroversion results from a specific configuration of screws comprising 3 horizontal humeroglenoid screws and 3 vertical acromiohumeral screws (318.5 +/- 99.0 N). For three forms of arthrodesis, each with 3 humerus-glenoid screws (299.9 +/- 95.4 N), no significant difference (P = .530) was found compared with a 16-hole plate arthrodesis (293.4 +/- 89.3 N). The plate arthrodeses only achieved higher power values on abduction and adduction stress in comparison with screw arthrodesis with 3 humerus-glenoid screws. The difference was insignificant. Because arthrodesis with 3 humerus-glenoid screws was significantly more stable on stress of anteversion and retroversion, this particular screw arthrodesis is considered superior to plate arthrodeses. The use of the most stable form of screw arthrodesis may reduce nonunion.

Adult↗