Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “AORTIC VALVE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography for assessment of aortic valve area in aortic valve stenosis.

Calcified aortic valve stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular disease in the elderly population and constitutes a significant health and socioeconomic problem. Doppler echocardiography is the recommended diagnostic tool for the initial evaluation of AS. Transvalvular pressure gradients and aortic valve area have been used as quantitative parameters for grading the severity of AS, but the latter one is less susceptible to changes in flow dynamics and therefore considered the more independent and reliable parameter. The aortic valve area can be assessed directly by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), which reflects the anatomic or geometric orifice area, or it can be calculated noninvasively by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) using the continuity equation, or, invasively, by cardiac catheterization (CC) using the Gorlin formula, both reflecting the effective orifice area. Assessment of aortic valve area by TTE can be limited in some patients due to inadequate acoustic window. Similarly, TEE as a semi-invasive technique is not well tolerated by some patients and the planimetry is limited in patients with heavily calcified aortic valve leaflets. CC is an invasive procedure associated with a substantial risk of cerebral embolism and the Gorlin formula has been shown to be susceptible to changes in flow dynamics. Cardiac magnetic resonance tomography (CMR) is a new imaging technique capable of imaging the aortic valve with high resolution and has recently been used for assessment of the aortic valve area in AS. This review focuses on the feasibility of CMR for the assessment of aortic valve area in AS compared to current standard techniques and discusses some of the typical pitfalls and the sources for the discrepant results observed between the different techniques for assessment of the aortic valve area.

Aortic Valve↗
PubMed1991

Allograft aortic valve replacement: long-term comparative clinical analysis of the viable cryopreserved and antibiotic 4 degrees C stored valves.

Aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant procedures was performed using an allograft aortic valve in 534 patients. From December 1969 to May 1975 (group I), a 4 degrees C stored valve was used (124 patients) and from June 1975 to July 1990 (group II), a cryopreserved valve (410 patients) was used. The 30-day mortality was 8.9% (confidence limits [CL] 6.2%-12.3%) for group I and 2.7% (CL 1.9%-3.8%) for group II. Actuarial patient survival including early hospital mortality at 14 years was 57% for group I and 71% for group II (p = 0.014). Actuarial freedom from thromboembolism for all patients (n = 534) was 94% at 14 years, and for patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement with or without coronary artery bypass graft (n = 457) was 97% at 14 years (p = 0.017). Actuarial freedom from allograft valve endocarditis at 14 years was 92% in group I and 94% in group II (p = 0.36). The actuarial freedom from moderate or severe allograft valve incompetence at 14 years was 50% (group I) and 78% (group II) (p = 0.27). Reoperation was undertaken for endocarditis, leaflet structural deterioration (SD), or technical reasons. The actuarial freedom from reoperation (all causes) at 14 years was 63% (group I) and 86% (group II) (p = 0.39). Reoperation for SD occurred in 34 patients in group I and three patients in group II. The actuarial freedom from reoperation for SD at 14 years was 67% (group I) and 95% (group II) (p = 0.001). To reflect a more accurate depiction of the prevalence of SD, patients were analyzed according to the development of "assumed structural deterioration" (at reoperation, at death with moderate or severe allograft valve incompetence and macroscopic valve deterioration on autopsy, and in the presence of moderate or severe allograft valve incompetence in patients not undergoing reoperation). The actuarial freedom from "assumed structural deterioration" at 14 years was 51% (group I) and 85% (group II) (p = 0.000003). The long-term results confirm the low incidence of thromboembolism and endocarditis regardless of the method of preservation and demonstrate the overall acceptable performance of the viable cryopreserved allograft valve and its superiority over the 4 degrees C stored valve.

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMed2005

Morphological and clinical findings in 247 surgically excised native aortic valves.

Aortic valve disease is an increasingly common medical problem in the 20th century; however, its pathogenesis is poorly understood. The present paper reviews 247 cases of aortic valves surgically excised over a one-year period, with special attention to the morphological and histological changes observed in surgically excised aortic valves, and to how those changes relate to the mechanisms of valve failure. Patient age ranged from 17 to 86 years, with a mean of 64.1 +/-13.4 years, and there were 156 men (63.2%) and 91 women (36.8%). A total of 172 valves (69.6%) were tricuspid and 75 valves (30.4%) were congenitally abnormal, of which 67 valves (27.1%) were congenitally bicuspid, six valves (2.4%) were congenitally unicommissural and one valve (0.4%) was quadricuspid; the status of one valve could not be determined. Almost 70% of patients had features of aortic stenosis. Calcification was seen in the large majority of cases, with almost 70% of the valves showing either grade 3 or grade 4 calcification. Ulceration of calcific nodules was present in 42.0% of cases and in the majority of the valves with grade 4 calcification. A total of 15% of the valves showed evidence of postinflammatory changes consistent with rheumatic disease. Neovascularization was present in two-thirds of all valves, while one-half showed inflammatory cell infiltrates. Inflammatory cells were composed mainly of lymphocytes and macrophages, and were located primarily near areas of neovascularization. There was no significant difference in the pathological findings between men and women.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

[Effect of age on valvular dysfunction and aortic dilatation in patients with a bicuspid aortic valve].

Aortic regurgitation was the commonest functional anomaly among younger patients in a group of 63 individuals with a diagnosis of bicuspid aortic valve. With increasing age, a rise in the number with combined aortic valve disease and aortic stenosis was observed. Aortic dilatation was found in 65% of cases. Dilatation was independently associated with age and transvalvular aortic gradient.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

[A case of minimal invasive aortic valve replacement for quadricuspid aortic valve with aortic regurgitation].

Congenital quadricuspid aortic valve is rare, which may be a cause of sever aortic regurgitation. We report a case of a 55-year-old man who had severe aortic regurgitation with congenital quadricuspid aortic valve. Preoperative aortography showed severe aortic regurgitation. Preoperative trans-esophageal echocardiography revealed abnormal quadricuspid aortic valve. We performed minimal invasive aortic valve replacement with SJM # 21 mm HP prosthetic valve through the limited upper sternotomy. Skin incision was 9 cm. Aortic cross-clamping time was 92 min, cardiopulmonary bypass time was 108 min. At the operation, a quadricuspid valve with three equal cusps and one small cusp was noted. The postoperative course was excellent and he discharged 8 days after the operation.

Aortic Valve↗
PubMed1994

The use of unstented homograft valves for aortic valve reoperations. Review of a twenty-three-year experience.

Unstented homograft valves offer several theoretical advantages when used for patients who have had previous operations on the aortic valve. Between January 1970 and February 1993, 177 patients received unstented homograft valves after previous aortic valve operations. One hundred thirty-four patients had previous aortic valve replacement in the form of homografts (101 patients), mechanical prostheses (24 patients), and bioprostheses (9 patients), and 43 had previous valve repair. The indication for reoperation was deterioration of a noninfected valve (124 patients), infective endocarditis (40 patients), and failure of a noninfected mechanical valve (12 patients). Fresh homograft valves were implanted in 60 patients, homografts preserved in antibiotics were used in 111 patients, and 6 patients received cryopreserved valves. Aortic valve and root replacement was performed in 60 patients, and in 117 the homograft was inserted freehand in the subcoronary position. The early mortality was 5.1%. The actuarial survival at 10 years was 71%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients with previous homograft replacement have a better long-term survival than patients who had previous mechanical valves (p = 0.017). The freedom from valve-related death and reoperation was 70% at 10 years. Fresh homografts faired better than antibiotic-sterilized homografts (p = 0.007). None of the patients had recurrence of endocarditis at 6 months, although 1 patient died of uncontrolled infection despite valve replacement. The freedom from recurrent endocarditis was 88% at 10 years. We conclude that unstented aortic homografts provide good early and long-term results for aortic valve reoperations, particularly in patients with previous homograft replacement. Recurrent endocarditis is uncommon even in patients operated on for prosthetic valve infections.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Current perspective on aortic valve repair and valve-sparing aortic root replacement.

Aortic valve repair and valve-sparing aortic root replacement are attractive concepts because they offer the possibility of valve competence without structural deterioration due to nonviability and they preclude the need for anticoagulation. Enthusiasm for aortic valve repair has waxed and waned over the past 45 years due in part to the inherent technical difficulties and poor mid-term results. Renewed interest in the concept of aortic valve repair has paralleled the development of valve-sparing aortic root replacement over the last 20 years. A current perspective on aortic valve repair and valve-sparing aortic root replacement is presented in the following review. Historical background, indications for repair, technical considerations, and outcomes data are discussed.

Aortic Valve↗
PubMed1990

[A case of quadricuspid aortic valve with aortic regurgitation].

A 67-year-old man with grade 3 aortic valve regurgitation was found to have a quadricuspid aortic valve. The aortic valve consisted of 1 large, 2 intermediate and 1 small sized cusp. An accessory cusp located between the right and noncoronary cusps, and shaped like a hammock which sling by the fibrous strings originating from the both commissures to the aortic wall. Aortic valve replacement was successfully performed with a 23 mm St. Jude Medical prosthetic valve, and the patient is asymptomatic five months post-operatively. Histological examination of the resected cusps showed fibrous thickening and no rheumatic valvulitis or infective endocarditis.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

In-vitro comparison of aortic valve hemodynamics between aortic root remodeling and aortic valve reimplantation.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Valve-preserving aortic replacement has become an accepted option for patients with aortic valve regurgitation and aortic dilatation. The relative role of root remodeling versus valve reimplantation inside a vascular graft has been discussed, albeit controversially. In the present study, an in-vitro model was used to investigate the aortic valve hemodynamics of root remodeling and valve reimplantation; roots with supracommissural aortic replacement served as controls. METHODS: Aortic roots with aortoventricular diameter 21 mm were obtained from pigs. Root remodeling was performed using a 22-mm graft (group I, n = 6), or valve reimplantation with a 24-mm graft (group II, n = 7). Control roots were treated by supracommissural aortic replacement (22-mm graft; group III, n = 7). Using an electrohydraulic, computer-controlled pulse duplicator, the valves were tested at flows of 2, 4, 5, 7, and 9 I/min at a heart rate of 70 /min and a mean arterial pressure of 100 mmHg. Parameters assessed included: mean pressure gradient, effective orifice area, valve closure and regurgitant volume, and energy loss due to ejection, valve closure and regurgitation. Data were compared using ANOVA. RESULTS: There were no differences between the three groups in terms of regurgitant volume, energy loss due to valve regurgitation, or valve closure. The aortic valve orifice area was largest and systolic gradient lowest in group I at all flow rates (p < 0.001). Ejection energy loss was lowest in group I at all flow rates (9 l/min: group I, 128 +/- 21 mJ; group II, 399 +/- 46 mJ; group III, 312 +/- 27 mJ; p < 0.001). Valve closure volumes were similar in groups I and III, but significantly lower in group II at all flow rates (p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: In this standardized experimental setting, root remodeling--but not valve reimplantation--resulted in physiologic hemodynamic performance of the aortic valve with regard to orifice area, pressure gradient, and systolic energy loss.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Aortic valve and aortic arch pathology after coarctation repair.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence of clinical problems related to a bicuspid valve (aortic stenosis and regurgitation) and the incidence of ascending aorta and aortic arch pathology in combination with coarctation repair. PATIENTS: 124 adult patients after surgical correction of aortic coarctation were studied. The incidence of aortic valve, ascending aorta, and aortic arch pathology was determined using echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. The median age at coarctation repair was 9 years and at last follow up 28 years. RESULTS: Three patients died from aorta pathology. Aortic valve disease was found in 63% of the patients, requiring an intervention in 22%, at a median of 13 years after coarctation repair. Ascending aorta dilatation was observed in 28% and aortic arch abnormalities in 23%, among whom kinking of the aortic arch was found in 12%. Antihypertensive medication was used in 24%. In the patients with hypertension the age at operation and age at follow up were significantly higher (p = 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: In addition to the well known problems of hypertension and recoarctation, aortic valve and aortic arch pathology are commonly encountered in patients with previous coarctation repair. Aortic abnormalities may predispose to dilatation and dissection, thus necessitating careful lifelong attention in all patients with coarctation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

In vitro comparison of aortic valve movement after valve-preserving aortic replacement.

OBJECTIVE: In aortic valve regurgitation and aortic dilatation, preservation of the aortic valve is possible by means of root remodeling (Yacoub procedure) or valve reimplantation (David procedure). In vivo studies suggest that reimplantation might substantially influence aortic valve-motion characteristics. Evaluation of aortic valve movement in vivo, however, is technically limited and is difficult to standardize. We evaluated the aortic valve-motion pattern echocardiographically in vitro after reimplantation and remodeling. METHODS: By using aortic roots of house pigs (aortoventricular diameter, 22 mm) a Yacoub procedure (22-mm graft; group Y, n = 5) or a David I procedure (24-mm graft; group D, n = 5) was performed. Roots after supracommissural replacement (22-mm graft; group C, n = 5) served as control valves. In an electrohydraulic, computer-controlled pulse duplicator the valves were tested at flows of 2, 4, 7, and 9 L/min. Echocardiographically assessed parameters were rapid valve-opening velocity, slow valve-closing velocity, rapid valve-closing velocity, rapid valve-opening time, rapid valve-closing time, ejection time, maximum valve opening, slow valve-closing displacement, and maximum flow velocity. RESULTS: Mean rapid valve-opening velocity and mean rapid valve-closing velocity at a cardiac output of 2 to 9 L/min were fastest in group D (rapid valve-opening velocity: 69 +/- 10 cm/s [group D] vs 39 +/- 4 cm/s [group Y] vs 42 +/- 4 cm/s [group C], P = .0041; rapid valve-closing velocity: 22 +/- 2 cm/s [group D] vs 16 +/- 2 cm/s [group Y] vs 17 +/- 1 cm/s [group C], P = .0272), and slow valve-closing velocity was slowest in group D (0.2 +/- 0.1 cm/s [group D] vs 1.0 +/- 0.3 cm/s [group Y] vs 0.6 +/- 0.1 cm/s [group C], P = .0063). With increasing cardiac output, the difference in rapid valve-opening velocity between the groups increased, the difference in slow valve-closing velocity remained unchanged, and the difference in rapid valve-closing velocity decreased. CONCLUSIONS: In this standardized experimental setting remodeling of the aortic valve provides significantly smoother valve movements. This might contribute to preservation of a better valve performance during long-term follow-up.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Aortic valve replacement. Aortic root versus coronary sinus perfusion with blood cardioplegic solution.

The role of retrograde coronary sinus cardioplegia in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis alone or in combination with myocardial revascularization has not been fully defined. Sixty-three patients undergoing elective aortic valve replacement received cold potassium blood cardioplegic solution via either the aortic root (36 patients) or the coronary sinus (27 patients). The patients were similar with respect to age, degree of aortic stenosis, ventricular function, severity of coronary artery disease, crossclamp time, completeness of revascularization, and mean volume and temperature of the infusion solution. The mean septal temperature and the release of myocardium-specific isoenzyme in the first 2 hours after crossclamp removal was higher in the retrograde group (p less than 0.008). Right and left ventricular function was preserved equally in the two groups, and volume-loading studies suggested improved diastolic performance in patients having retrograde cardioplegia. There were no differences between the two groups with respect to clinical outcome. We conclude that coronary sinus cardioplegia is as safe as aortic root perfusion for myocardial preservation in patients undergoing elective aortic valve replacement.

Aorta↗
PubMed1998

[A surgical case of quadricuspid aortic valve associated aortic regurgitation and severe mitral regurgitation due to infective endocarditis].

We report a case of rare anomaly of quadricuspid aortic valve associated aortic regurgitation and severe mitral regurgitation due to infective endocarditis. A 50-year-old man was admitted to our hospital for fever and dyspnea. The transesophageal echocardiography showed severe aortic regurgitation due to four equal aortic cusps and severe mitral regurgitation due to infective endocarditis. At the operation, aortic valve and mitral valve were replaced with 23 mm and 29 mm SJM valves. His postoperative course was uneventful.

Aortic Valve↗
PubMed1988

Aortic valve endocarditis with aortic root abscess cavity: surgical treatment with aortic valve homograft.

Aortic valve endocarditis with an aortic root abscess cavity was treated by a modification of the standard technique of aortic homograft implantation in 3 patients. At a mean follow-up of 35 months, all 3 patients were well without reoperation or signs of aortic incompetence. This technique may, in some cases, be an alternative to the more complex procedure of homograft aortic root replacement with coronary reimplantation.

Abscess↗
PubMed1980

Orifice-view aortography in patients with congenitally deformed aortic valves: determination of aortic valve area.

Orifice-view aortography is a contrast cineaortographic technique that allows en face viewing of the aortic valve. In this projection the anatomic configuration of the aortic valve is identified, and it is possible to planimeterize the visualized aortic valve opening and accurately determine the orifice area. Fifteen individuals with congenitally deformed aortic valves with gradients ranging from trivial (< 10 mm Hg) to surgically significant (6E 60 mm Hg) were subjected to aortic orifice area measurement by orifice-view aortography, and the area was compared with the peak systolic gradient and valve area. The results yielded a cloe correlation with the aortic valve area index as measured hydraulically or, as in three instances, directly from the surgically excised specimen (r = 0.94). A satisfactory correlation was also shown with the valve area index and the peak aortic valve gradient (r = 0.85). These observations indicate that orifice-view aortography is an accurate method for the measurement of the aortic valve orifice and may be particularly useful when hydraulic measurements are unattainable or invalid.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Evaluation of postoperative cardiac function and long-term results in patients after aortic valve replacement for aortic valve disease with increased left ventricular mass.

OBJECTIVE: This clinical study was designed to evaluate the postoperative cardiac function in patients after aortic valve replacement for aortic valve disease with increased left ventricular mass. METHODS: Aortic valve replacement was performed in 117 patients using the St. Jude Medical valve. Their valve lesion was aortic regurgitation in 71, and aortic stenosis in 46. The mean value of the left ventricular mass index was 272 g/m2. The 117 patients were subdivided into 4 groups according to their preoperative left ventricular mass index-Group I (n = 35) with aortic regurgitation and a large left ventricular mass index (> or = 273 g/m2), Group II (n = 36) with aortic regurgitation and a small left ventricular mass index Group III (n = 19) with aortic stenosis and a large left ventricular mass index, and Group IV (n = 27) with aortic stenosis and a small left ventricular mass index. The cardiac function was evaluated by radionuclide ventriculography. RESULTS: In a comparative study of postoperative parameters among the 4 groups, the postoperative systolic and diastolic parameters of Group I patients were more significantly impaired compared with these parameters of the other 3 groups. The postoperative values the left ventricular mass index were significantly higher in Group I than in the other 3 groups. The 10-year survival rate was significantly lower in Group I than in the other 3 groups (30 +/- 22% in Group I). CONCLUSION: Aortic valve replacement is recommended for patients with eccentric hypertrophy in the adequate clinical phase of patients whose left ventricular mass index is less than 272 g/m2.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Erosion and perforation of a cusp by nodular calcification: an unusual cause of insufficiency in a congenital bicuspid aortic valve.

Aortic valve insufficiency may occur in a number of backgrounds. A unique etiology is illustrated in a 53-year-old man with terminal cardiac failure due to ischemic heart and aortic valvular disease. Nodular calcification complicated a congenital bicuspid valve and caused erosion through a valve cusp, producing a chronic cusp defect and valvular insufficiency.

Aortic Valve↗
PubMed2002

Ventricular septal defect complicated by infective endocarditis of the aortic valve causing severe aortic regurgitation: the role of aortic valve repair.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OF THE STUDY: Children with ventricular septal defect (VSD) who develop severe aortic regurgitation following infective endocarditis (IE) require aortic valve replacement in most cases. Few reports exist of repair of the aortic valve under such circumstances. Here, we report details from two patients in whom aortic valve repair resulted in a good outcome. METHODS: Two children (aged 4 and 3 years) with either perimembranous or doubly committed subarterial VSD presented with congestive cardiac failure (NYHA class IV) following IE. The aortic valve in both children, and the pulmonary valve in one child, were severely damaged with vegetation, leading to severe (grade IV) aortic regurgitation. The second patient had bilateral bronchiectasis with respiratory infection and severe anemia. In addition to VSD closure, partial cuspal replacement using glutaraldehyde-tanned pericardium was performed successfully in both cases to restore geometry. RESULTS: Both children showed a dramatic improvement following surgery and during follow up of 36 and 11 months, respectively. Both remained asymptomatic, with good growth, good left ventricular function and the presence of only trivial aortic regurgitation. CONCLUSION: In selected patients with suitable anatomy, repair of the aortic valve with pericardial cusp replacement may be the procedure of choice. An additional benefit is the avoidance of long-term anticoagulation.

Aortic Valve↗