Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ANTISEPSIS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Meningococcemia as a model for testing the hypothesis of antisepsis therapies.

OBJECTIVE: To critically review the advantages and disadvantages of pediatric meningococcemia as a model for testing antisepsis therapies. DATA SOURCES: Research and review articles on the pathogenesis and treatment of human meningococcemia, as well as editorial commentaries discussing the failure of clinical trials for adult sepsis or Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome. Data from these sources are presented in the context of the author's experience as principal investigator in a large, randomized trial on children with invasive meningococcal disease. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Studies were selected to include aspects of epidemiology, pathophysiology, outcome prediction, and therapeutic trials. DATA SYNTHESIS: Compared with an adult sepsis population, meningococcemia is a single disease, diagnosed clinically with high reliability. Patients are previously healthy, without underlying medical or surgical conditions. In contrast to sepsis trials, nearly all patients with meningococcal disease receive effective antibiotics. Finally, meningococcemia most closely resembles animal models of endotoxin infusion, in which most antisepsis therapies have been highly effective. However, the meningococcal model carries major disadvantages, among them that meningococcemia is rare and rapidly progressive and patients are widely dispersed geographically. In addition, a wide range of experimental therapies is routinely provided in an attempt to preserve life or limbs. CONCLUSIONS: Meningococcemia is an ideal model of a rapidly progressive bacterial infection associated with marked endotoxemia. Problems with the model can be overcome by extensive pretrial logistic planning, as well as close coordination and cooperation with national regulatory agencies.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

A new surgical handwashing and hand antisepsis from scrubbing to rubbing.

In 2002, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published guidelines for surgical handwashing and hand antisepsis on the Internet. According to these guidelines, we revised our surgical handwashing method from scrubbing with brushes to rubbing with antiseptic. The new method consists of scrubbing around the nails with brushes and rubbing the hands and arms with antiseptic from the elbow to the antebrachium. A total of 182 surgeons and operating-room nurses participated in the current study. Bacterial contamination was investigated using the glove-juice method. The new surgical handwashing method is simple, and requires only a short time to perform (2 minutes 50 seconds). The bacterial examination confirmed that rubbing the hands with antiseptic was significantly more effective than scrubbing with brushes. In terms of sterilization or prolonged effects, 4% chlor-hexidine gluconate (CHG) was superior to 7.5% povidone-iodine (PVI) throughout a 3-hour period after hand antisepsis. Although bacterial counts were increased 3 hours after the beginning of surgery, additional hand rubbing with 0.2% chlorhexidine-83% ethanol (Hibisoft(TM)) was effective in suppressing the number of bacteria. Hibisoft(TM) successfully prolonged sterilization for more than 3 hours. For long surgical procedures, CHG should be used as an antiseptic and gloves should be changed every 3 hours, alcohol-based hand rubbing should also be performed 3 hours after the initial handwashing. This new technique will be included in the OSCE curriculum to ensure its standardization. Moreover, in-depth education regarding central operating-room practices is desired.

Anti-Infective Agents, Local↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effect of rotary instrumentation and of the association of calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidine on the antisepsis of the root canal system in dogs.

This study aimed at evaluating the antisepsis of the root canal system (RCS) and periapical region (PR) provided by rotary instrumentation associated with chlorhexidine + calcium hydroxide as intracanal medicament. Chronic periapical lesions were induced in 26 pre-molar roots in two dogs. After microbiological sampling, automatic instrumentation using the Profile system and irrigation with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite solution, with a final rinse of 14.3% EDTA followed by profuse irrigation with physiological saline were carried out in 18 root canals. After drying the canals, a paste based on calcium hydroxide associated with a 2% chlorhexidine digluconate solution was placed inside them. After 21 days, the medication was removed, leaving the root canals empty and coronally sealed. After 96 hours, a final microbiological sample was obtained, followed by histomicrobiological processing by the Brown & Brenn method. Eight untreated root canals represented the control group (C-G). Based on the Mann-Whitney test at a confidence level of 5% (p < 0.05), the procedures of antisepsis used offered significant efficacy (p < 0.05) resulting in 100.0% of the canals free of microorganisms. In the C-G, an elevated incidence of various microbial morphotypes was confirmed in all sites of the RCS, with the presence of microbial colonies in the periapical region. In contrast, the experimental group showed a similar pattern of infection in the RCS, although less intense and a reduced level of periapical infection (p < 0.05). It was concluded that adequate instrumentation followed by the application of calcium hydroxide + chlorhexidine offered significant elimination of microorganisms.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Therapeutic ratio quantifies laser antisepsis: ablation of Porphyromonas gingivalis with dental lasers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It is established that both pulsed Nd:YAG (1,064 nm) and continuous diode (810 nm) dental lasers kill pathogenic bacteria (laser antisepsis), but a quantitative method for determining clinical dosimetry does not exist. The purpose of this study was to develop a method to quantify the efficacy of ablation of Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg) in vitro for two different lasers. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ablation thresholds for the two lasers were compared in the following manner. The energy density was measured as a function of distance from the output of the fiber-optic delivery system. Pg cultures were grown on blood agar plates under standard anaerobic conditions. Blood agar provides an approximation of gingival tissue for the wavelengths tested in having hemoglobin as a primary absorber. Single pulses of laser energy were delivered to Pg colonies and the energy density was increased until the appearance of a small plume was observed coincident with a laser pulse. The energy density at this point defines the ablation threshold. Ablation thresholds to a single pulse were determined for both Pg and for blood agar alone. RESULTS: The large difference in ablation thresholds between the pigmented pathogen and the host matrix for pulsed-Nd:YAG represented a significant therapeutic ratio and Pg was ablated without visible effect on the blood agar. Near threshold the 810-nm diode laser destroyed both the pathogen and the gel. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically, the pulsed Nd:YAG may selectively destroy pigmented pathogens leaving the surrounding tissue intact. The 810-nm diode laser may not demonstrate this selectivity due to its greater absorption by hemoglobin and/or longer pulse duration.

Antisepsis↗
PubMed2005

[Hygienic and dermatologic aspects of hand disinfection and prophylactic skin antisepsis].

Hygienic hand disinfection must be carried out after all patient-care activities associated with contamination risks, as well as when moving from contaminated to clean body sites, after contact with environmental surfaces in the immediate vicinity of patients, after glove removal and before aseptic procedures. Preparatory handwashing (for about 10 seconds) to mechanically remove soil and bacterial spores should be performed at least 10 minutes before surgical hand disinfection. This allows time for the normalization of increased skin hydration, a prerequisite for effective hand disinfection. Depending on the manufacturer's instructions, application times of 1.5, 3 or 5 minutes can be observed. The regular use of skin care and skin protection products can help to prevent toxic skin irritation. For skin antisepsis the recommended exposure times are > or =15 seconds before subcutaneous injections, > or =1 minute before puncture of joints and body cavities as well as preoperatively, and > or =10 minutes on skin areas rich in sebaceous glands. For all 3 indications, alcohol-based formulations are the agents of choice.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1984

Postmilking teat antisepsis.

An effort was made to present the historical development of postmilking teat sanitizers, to discuss advantages and limitations of postmilking teat sanitization relative to specific mastitis pathogens, regulatory requirements, and the generic types of teat sanitizers. Methodologies used to evaluate the potential of teat sanitizers in reducing incidence of new IMI were discussed. Efficacy data from numerous controlled studies were discussed briefly. Teat-dip manufacturers advertise differences in efficacy values that were obtained under controlled research conditions. We are led to believe that relatively small differences in efficacy should prompt the use of one product over another. These efficacy differences have little comparative value, because the products, in most instances, were studied independently and the commercial extrapolations leave much to be desired for factual purposes. Management practices on individual dairy farms have more effect on reduction of rate of infections than do small differences in product efficacy. Also, some companies advertise about effective, in vitro germicidal activity. Such data do not relate to reduction in rate of udder infections and should not be considered evidence of efficacy in prevention of mastitis. A startling realization should become evident from this review; a paucity of information is available on some vital parameters relative to prevention of IMI. Many important areas of mastitis control related to postmilking teat antisepsis need an increased research commitment. Some of these areas include: effects of temperature on germicidal activity of teat dips; effects of climatic conditions on teat microflora; epidemiology of IMI with environmental pathogens; relationship between teat skin condition and incidence of IMI; and alternative control methods to reduce incidence of IMI. This question is asked often: "What is the best teat dip?" In my opinion, the best teat dip is the one that is dripping from teats when the cow leaves the parlor. In the words, most of the products sold today effectively prevent IMI when used properly.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

[Efficacy of various methods for preoperative vaginal antisepsis].

In a prospective clinical study we investigated 115 patients prior to vaginal surgical interventions to determine the antimicrobial efficacy of six different procedures for vaginal antisepsis. To sample the microorganisms we used a cotton swab moistened with a neutralising fluid. Immediately after the time of action of the antiseptic procedures (3 minutes), providone-iodine solution, applied undiluted or diluted 1:10, yielded the strongest median reduction of the vaginal flora (log RF 3.60 and 2.68, respectively). Of three detergents with antiseptic efficacy, octenidine 0.1% was the most efficient formula (log RF 2.32). After 30 minutes the log reduction factors (log RF) of almost all procedures (log RF 2.79-3.25) were in a fairly close range, excepting chlorohexidine 0.05% (log RF 2.07). Overall, the antiseptic detergents showed a marked residual effect, which was less pronounced, if at all, with providone-iodine solutions. A germ-reducing effect of povidone-iodine vaginal suppositories, applied 2 to 3 hrs prior to surgery, was not confirmed, while additional findings indicated that providone-iodine solution applied with the help of a vaginal douche yields a similarly strong germ reduction as the application by means of a ball swabs.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

The role of iodine in antisepsis and wound management: a reappraisal.

For more than 150 years, iodine has been used for the prevention of infection and for the treatment of wounds. Nowadays a large amount of published evidence is available and, although it is generally in support of the use of iodine product, it is confused by being a mixture of laboratory, animals and human studies, often using different preparations. This makes interpretation and comparison difficult. After new developments and publications, the role of iodine in antisepsis and in wound management needs to be reevaluated. We mainly focused our review on the following problems: the role of the newly developed formulations of iodine preparations, its antimicrobial activity, the possibility of impairing the wound healing process, the role of iodine in the problem of growing resistance against antibiotics and antiseptics. New formulations seem to keep the same clinical efficacy, avoiding the problem of toxicity; it seems that the antibacterial activity of iodine is superior compared to other products and, in contrast with antibiotics and other antiseptics, it seems to have no resistance problem. It seems that povidone-iodine has all the characteristics to become the first choice antiseptic in wound treatment.

Anti-Infective Agents, Local↗
PubMed2002

Skin antisepsis kits containing alcohol and chlorhexidine gluconate or tincture of iodine are associated with low rates of blood culture contamination.

OBJECTIVE: Skin preparation is an important factor in reducing the rate of blood culture contamination. We assessed blood culture contamination rates associated with the use of skin antisepsis kits containing either 2% alcoholic chlorhexidine gluconate or 2% alcoholic tincture of iodine. DESIGN: Prospective, blinded clinical trial. SETTING: Tertiary-care teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Adult patients in medical wards, the medical intensive care unit, and the cardiac intensive care unit who needed paired, percutaneous blood cultures. INTERVENTIONS: House officers, medical students, and healthcare technicians drew the blood for cultures. We prepared sacks containing all of the necessary supplies, including two different types of antiseptic kits. In each sack, one kit contained 2% chlorhexidine in 70% isopropyl alcohol and the other contained 2% tincture of iodine in ethyl alcohol and 70% isopropyl alcohol. Each patient received chlorhexidine at one site and tincture of iodine at the other. RESULTS: Four (0.9%) of 430 blood culture sets from 215 patients were contaminated. The contamination rate when using alcohol and chlorhexidine (1 of 215, 0.5%) did not differ significantly from the contamination rate when using tincture of iodine (3 of 215, 1.4%; P = .62, McNemar test). There was an 87% probability that the two interventions differed by less than 2% in their rate of contamination. CONCLUSIONS: Both of these antiseptic kits were highly effective for skin preparation prior to drawing blood for cultures. The use of these kits may have contributed to the low contamination rate observed in this study.

2-Propanol↗
PubMed1997

Povidone-iodine in antisepsis--state of the art.

The natural element iodine has been used for more than 150 years to prevent infection and treat wounds. Yet only due to the development of iodophors has it become possible to use this highly efficient microbicide in a wide range of medical applications. The antimicrobial spectrum is universal. Its efficiency against clinically and epidemiologically significant new pathogens, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus sp. has also been validated. No development of resistance has been determined. New data are also available on the excellent local tolerability of Betaisodona (povidone-iodine) preparations. On these grounds, a number of clinical fields exist in prophylaxis and therapy, for either once only or repeated applications: the disinfection of hands and skin, mucosa antisepsis, intra- and postoperative wound treatment, therapy of skin infections, burns and chronic wounds.

Anti-Infective Agents, Local↗
PubMed1997

Vaginal antisepsis for hysterectomy: a review of the literature.

Infectious complications of hysterectomy remain common despite the use of prophylactic antibiotics. Most are caused by contamination of the surgical site by vaginal bacteria which are not controlled by current methods of pre-operative antisepsis. The medical literature concerning antiseptic preparation of the vagina for surgery was reviewed to discover the evidence on which practice may be based. A search using Medline, Current Contents, the Cochrane Library and the reference lists of articles on the subject and of major gynaecology textbooks produced 13 comparative studies. No conclusive randomized controlled trials were found and most of the studies had severe methodological problems limiting interpretation of their results. The scant available data suggest that use of vaginal antiseptics before the patient arrives in the operating room is probably not useful, and that application of povidone-iodine vaginal gel at the beginning of abdominal hysterectomy is sufficiently promising to justify further investigation.

Anti-Infective Agents, Local↗
PubMed2000

[Indicators of quality for hospital antisepsis].

In any health care institution, the most important quality indicator for antisepsis is the existence of systems of reference of use, secondly the knowledge of those systems and then the compliance by the different classes of professionals. These refrentials must be regularly evaluated and updated according to general consensus.

Antisepsis↗
PubMed1989

[Asepsis and vigorous antisepsis against infectious disease transmission in the dental office].

Therapeutic acts often surgically practised in the dental office can lead to the transmission of infectious diseases such as A.I.D.S. To prevent this, the authors propose guideline base acts for antisepsis and asepsis. In conclusion, the authors exhort for an integration of these antiseptic acts in the efficient working of the dental office for an effective prevention of these infectious diseases in the area.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed2000

Usefulness of an alcohol solution of N-duopropenide for the surgical antisepsis of the hands compared with handwashing with iodine-povidone and chlorhexidine: clinical essay.

BACKGROUND: The usual surgical antisepsis involves scrubbing the skin with antiseptic solutions. This procedure can damage the skin, with the subsequent risk of infection for the patient. There are several efficient and quick-acting antiseptic alcohol solutions that require no scrubbing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We compare four alcohol solutions with the classic surgical handwashing products (chlorhexidine and iodine-povidone), in both in vitro (pigskin germ carriers) and in vivo studies. The latter (clinical essays) were done with healthy volunteers (crossed design) as well as with 154 surgical team members (Plastic Surgery or Traumatology), whose hand microbial flora were measured before and after scrubbing up and after surgery. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Because of its efficiency in the germ carrier, we chose a solution of N-duopropenide in 60 degrees alcohol with emollients for further comparison with the standard surgical scrub: 4% chlorhexidine and 7.5% iodine-povidone. The quantitative, semiquantitative, and qualitative results obtained with N-duopropenide without scrubbing were better in the healthy volunteers and surgical teams. This product reduced hand microorganisms by more than 2 log, and maintained the reduction for the entire study period. Four percent chlorhexidine initially reduced colonization more than 2 log but lost part of its effect over time during the surgical intervention. Last, 7.5% iodine-povidone reduced the germs by 1 log but at the end of surgery there were even more germs than before washing. CONCLUSION: Because of its efficacy, persistent effect, and skin protection, we advise that scrubbing with classic antiseptic solutions be replaced with gentle washing with an alcohol solution such as N-duopropenide in alcohol.

Aldehydes↗
PubMed1991

[The advantage of preventive vaginal antisepsis with hexetidine in obstetrics and gynecology].

In five studies, the advantage of repeated vaginal prophylaxis by a new preparation of hexetidine vaginal suppositories (10 mg) was investigated prospectively, randomised and method-controlled (n = 2 x 50). After a five-day application, the hexetidine group achieved bacterial reductions of five log CFU/ml in the vagina and nearly three log CFU/ml in the cervix uteri, whilst no reduction was found in the controls at any time (p less than 0.01). The reduction of individual bacterial species was investigated in 224 pregnant and also gynaecological patients. In cases of impending preterm childbirth, a five-day application of 20 mg hexetidine/day could reduce all bacteria sufficiently with the exception of lactobacilli; especially beta Streptococci were reduced. The same was achieved by a three-day application of 10 mg hexetidine/day pre-operatively. A long-term study in 11,724 deliveries showed, that neonatal infectious mortality and morbidity after 36 gestational weeks could be reduced significantly by hexetidine. The new hexetidine preparation appeared to be efficient in vaginal antisepsis, especially in pregnancy. A favourable lactobacilli-selective effect was demonstrated. Since the importance of lactobacilli in vaginal ecology is known, hexetidine prophylaxis must be considered as advantageous in Obstetrics and Gynecology. From a practical and economic point of view, the application of hexetidine as vaginal suppositories appears favourable compared to antiseptic solutions.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Antimicrobial activity of a new intact skin antisepsis formulation.

UNLABELLED: Different antiseptic formulations have shown limitations when applied to disinfecting intact skin, notably short-term tolerability and/or efficacy. The purpose of this study was optimizing a new antiseptic formulation specifically targeted at intact skin disinfection and evaluating its in vitro microbicidal activity and in vivo efficacy. METHODS: The biocidal properties of the antiseptic solution containing 0.5% chloramine-T diluted in 50% isopropyl alcohol (Cloral; Eurospital SpA Trieste, Italy) were measured in vitro versus gram-positive-, gram-negative-, and acid-alcohol-resistant germs and fungi with standard suspension tests in the presence of fetal bovine serum. Virus-inhibiting activity was evaluated in vitro against human cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, poliovirus, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus. Tests used different methods for the different biologic and in vitro replication capacity of these human viruses. Lastly, Cloral tolerability and skin colonization retardation efficacy after disinfection were studied in vivo. RESULTS: The antiseptic under review showed fast and sustained antimicrobial activity. The efficacy of Cloral against clinically important bacterial and viral pathogens and fungi was highlighted under the experimental conditions described in this article. Finally, microbial regrowth lag and no side effects were documented in vivo after disinfection of 11 volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: A stable chloramine-T solution in isopropyl alcohol may be suggested for intact skin antisepsis.

2-Propanol↗
PubMed2003

Comparison of waterless hand antisepsis agents at short application times: raising the flag of concern.

OBJECTIVE: Although alcohol-based hand rinses and gels have recommended application times of 30 to 60 seconds, healthcare workers usually take much less time for hand hygiene. We compared the efficacies of four alcohol-based hand rubs produced in Europe (hand rinses A, B, and C and one gel formulation) with the efficacy of the European Norm 1500 (EN 1500) reference waterless hand antisepsis agent (60% 2-propanol) at short application times. DESIGN: Comparative crossover study. SETTING: Infection Control Program laboratory of a large tertiary-care teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve healthy volunteers. INTERVENTION: Measurement of residual bacterial counts and log reduction factors following inoculation of fingertips with Staphylococcus aurens American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) 6538, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 15442, and a clinical isolate of Enterococcus faecalis. RESULTS: All hand rinses satisfied EN 1500 standards following a single application for 15 and 30 seconds, but reduction factors for the gel formulation were significantly lower for all tested organisms (all P < .025). CONCLUSIONS: Under stringent conditions similar to clinical practice, all three hand rinses proved to be more efficacious than the marketed alcohol-based gel in reducing bacterial counts on hands. Further studies are necessary to determine the in vivo efficacy of alcohol-based gels and whether they are as efficacious as alcohol-based rinses in reducing the transmission of nosocomial infections.

Anti-Infective Agents, Local↗
PubMed1998

The dynamics of disease progression in sepsis: Markov modeling describing the natural history and the likely impact of effective antisepsis agents.

We conducted a 9-month prospective cohort study of 2,527 patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome in three intensive care units and three general wards in a tertiary health care institution. Markov models were developed to predict the probability of movement to and from more severe stages--sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock--at 1, 3, and 7 days. For patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, the probabilities of remaining in the same category after 1 day were .65, .68, and .61, respectively. The probability for progression after 1 day was .09 for sepsis to severe sepsis and .026 for severe sepsis to shock. The probability of patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock dying after 1 day was .005, .009, and .079, respectively. The model can be used to predict the reduction in end organ dysfunction and mortality with use of increasingly effective antisepsis agents.

Disease Progression↗