PubMed2026
Lesion-symptom mapping is widely used to identify causal relationships between brain structures and behaviour, and has played a central role in neuropsychologically informed network models of cognition. However, even recent approaches remain constrained by a one-to-one mapping framework, which oversimplifies the complex relationships between network-level damage and cognitive deficits. In addition, the non-orthogonality of cortical and white matter damage makes it difficult to disentangle their distinct contributions. Here, we used graph-based multilayer network analysis to address these limitations and evaluate clinical relevance. Using neuroanatomical and longitudinal neuropsychological data from 252 patients who underwent awake neurosurgery for low-grade glioma, we constructed interactive, three-layer networks for each hemisphere. Layer 1 comprised neuropsychological tasks (NT), layer 2 structural disconnections (SD), and layer 3 cortical damage (CD). Nodes represented tasks, white matter tracts, and cortical parcels, respectively, whereas within-layer edges captured correlations in performance or co-occurring damage patterns. Multilayer community detection identified domain- and hemisphere-specific brain-behaviour motifs linking executive, language, and spatial functions to distinct combinations of cortical and white matter disruption, a pattern confirmed by two spatial embedding approaches. Centrality analyses revealed a continuum of mapping relationships, ranging from one-to-one to one-to-many associations, indicating that tasks such as verbal fluency are better explained by multiple disconnection mechanisms. Additional analyses uncovered many-to-one and many-to-many relationships and highlighted tracts and cortical regions with domain-general relevance. Together, these findings support a neurobiologically grounded, network-oriented account of how structural brain damage gives rise to cognitive deficits, with implications for clinical care.