Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “adjuvant”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: adjuvant therapy for breast cancer, November 1-3, 2000.

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to provide health-care providers, patients, and the general public with an assessment of currently available data regarding the use of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. PARTICIPANTS: The participants included a non-Federal, non-advocate, 14-member panel representing the fields of oncology, radiology, surgery, pathology, statistics, public health, and health policy as well as patient representatives. In addition, 30 experts in medical oncology, radiation oncology, biostatistics, epidemiology, surgical oncology, and clinical trials presented data to the panel and to a conference audience of 1000. EVIDENCE: The literature was searched with the use of MEDLINE(TM) for January 1995 through July 2000, and an extensive bibliography of 2230 references was provided to the panel. Experts prepared abstracts for their conference presentations with relevant citations from the literature. Evidence from randomized clinical trials and evidence from prospective studies were given precedence over clinical anecdotal experience. CONSENSUS PROCESS: The panel, answering predefined questions, developed its conclusions based on the evidence presented in open forum and the scientific literature. The panel composed a draft statement, which was read in its entirety and circulated to the experts and the audience for comment. Thereafter, the panel resolved conflicting recommendations and released a revised statement at the end of the conference. The panel finalized the revisions within a few weeks after the conference. The draft statement was made available on the World Wide Web immediately after its release at the conference and was updated with the panel's final revisions. The statement is available at http://consensus.nih.gov. CONCLUSIONS: The panel concludes that decisions regarding adjuvant hormonal therapy should be based on the presence of hormone receptor protein in tumor tissues. Adjuvant hormonal therapy should be offered only to women whose tumors express hormone receptor protein. Because adjuvant polychemotherapy improves survival, it should be recommended to the majority of women with localized breast cancer regardless of lymph node, menopausal, or hormone receptor status. The inclusion of anthracyclines in adjuvant chemotherapy regimens produces a small but statistically significant improvement in survival over non-anthracycline-containing regimens. Available data are currently inconclusive regarding the use of taxanes in adjuvant treatment of lymph node-positive breast cancer. The use of adjuvant dose-intensive chemotherapy regimens in high-risk breast cancer and of taxanes in lymph node-negative breast cancer should be restricted to randomized trials. Ongoing studies evaluating these treatment strategies should be supported to determine if such strategies have a role in adjuvant treatment. Studies to date have included few patients older than 70 years. There is a critical need for trials to evaluate the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in these women. There is evidence that women with a high risk of locoregional tumor recurrence after mastectomy benefit from postoperative radiotherapy. This high-risk group includes women with four or more positive lymph nodes or an advanced primary cancer. Currently, the role of postmastectomy radiotherapy for patients with one to three positive lymph nodes remains uncertain and should be tested in a randomized controlled trial. Individual patients differ in the importance they place on the risks and benefits of adjuvant treatments. Quality of life needs to be evaluated in selected randomized clinical trials to examine the impact of the major acute and long-term side effects of adjuvant treatments, particularly premature menopause, weight gain, mild memory loss, and fatigue. Methods to support shared decision-making between patients and their physicians have been successful in trials; they need to be tailored for diverse populations and should be tested for broader dissemination.

Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic↗
PubMed2003

International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm trial 1: a randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with early-stage ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: The question of whether platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy can improve outcomes in patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer is an important one. We carried out a multicenter, open randomized trial to determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy would improve overall survival and prolong recurrence-free survival in women with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Between August 1991 and January 2000, 477 patients in 84 centers in five countries were randomly assigned to receive either adjuvant chemotherapy immediately following surgery (n = 241) or no adjuvant chemotherapy until clinically indicated (n = 236). Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival and recurrence-free survival were compared using the Mantel-Cox version of the log-rank test. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Women who received adjuvant chemotherapy had better overall survival than women who did not (hazard ratio [HR] of 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.45 to 0.97; P =.03). These results translate into 5-year survival figures of 70% for women who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy and 79% for women who did receive adjuvant chemotherapy, a difference of 9% (95% CI = 1% to 15%). Adjuvant chemotherapy also improved recurrence-free survival (HR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.46 to 0.91; P =.01). These results translate into 5-year recurrence-free survival figures of 62% for women who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy and 73% for women who did receive adjuvant chemotherapy, a difference of 11% (95% CI = 3% to 18%). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival and delays recurrence in patients with early-stage ovarian cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy with or without anthracyclines on the activity and efficacy of first-line cyclophosphamide, epidoxorubicin, and fluorouracil in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of previous adjuvant chemotherapy with or without anthracyclines on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response (OR) rates of metastatic breast cancer patients treated with cyclophosphamide, epidoxorubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) as first-line chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three-hundred twenty-six assessable metastatic breast cancer patients entered onto four consecutive randomized trials performed in our Institution and North-West Oncology Group (GONO) cooperative centers from 1983 to 1994. Patients received CEF-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy and were then evaluated. One hundred forty-four patients (44%) did not receive previous adjuvant chemotherapy, and 143 (44%) and 39 (12%) patients received cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF)-based and anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy, respectively. RESULTS: ORs to CEF chemotherapy were observed in 161 patients (49.4%). On univariate analysis, patients who had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy had a significantly lower probability of response than patients who did not: 43% versus 58% (P=.02). No difference between CMF-based (OR rate, 43%) and anthracycline-based (OR rate, 44%) adjuvant chemotherapy was observed. Stepwise logistic regression analysis indicated that adjuvant chemotherapy (P=.005), bone as dominant metastatic site (P=.02), and previous hormonotherapy for metastatic disease (P=.005) were the most important factors in predicting a poor OR rate. The median PFS and OS times of the whole group were 9.8 and 17.9 months, respectively. Patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy had a longer survival time (21.1 months) compared with patients previously treated with CMF-based (15.3 months) or anthracycline-based (15.8 months) adjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis confirmed adjuvant chemotherapy to be among the strongest prognostic factors associated with both a poor PFS and OS. CONCLUSION: Previous adjuvant chemotherapy adversely affects OR, PFS, and OS in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with the CEF regimen as first-line chemotherapy. No difference was observed between patients previously treated with CMF-based or anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

[Influence of aluminum adjuvant to experimental rabies vaccine].

OBJECTIVE: To study whether the rabies vaccine for human use should contain aluminum adjuvant. METHODS: Testing vaccine antibodies and efficacy (ED50), comparing the effect between aluminum adjuvant contained and non-aluminum adjuvant contained vaccines in a new animal model which accords with the rabies field practice. RESULTS: At fourth and seventh day after immunization, the neutralizing antibody titres of the rabies vaccine containing aluminium adjuvant were much lower than that of the vaccine not containing aluminum adjuvant. In the NIH efficacy test the ED50 of the vaccine containing aluminum adjuvant was 93-132 ng while the ED50 of the vaccine not containing aluminum adjuvant was 221 ng, but the NIH test does not accord with the rabies field practice. In that new animal model, aluminum adjuvant to rabies vaccine had not any promoting effect for preventing and treating rabies. CONCLUSION: Aluminum adjuvant to rabies vaccine has no advantages, this paper suggests that the vaccines containing and not-containing aluminium adjuvant had better compare in human bodies. If the results are the same as our experiments, the aluminum adjuvant should be eliminated from rabies vaccine for human use.

Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic↗
PubMed1992

Impact of adjuvant therapy on locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach.

From 1975 to 1988, 120 consecutive patients with locally advanced (T3/T4 or N1/N2) adenocarcinoma of the stomach underwent attempted curative resection. Seventy patients were treated with surgery alone while 50 patients also received adjuvant therapy consisting of either chemotherapy (5-FU/FAM) alone, radiation therapy alone, or chemotherapy+radiation therapy. Adjuvant therapy was tolerated relatively well with only one patient experiencing a grade 3 (RTOG/EORTC) toxicity, and none experiencing grade 4/5 toxicity. In patients with T3/T4 tumors, the median survival was 10 months for surgery alone as compared to 18 months for the adjuvant treatment group, and a 5-year survival of 10% versus 24% in the adjuvant therapy group (p = .01). In patients with lymph node positive disease, the median survival was 10 months in patients treated with surgery as compared to 15 months for those treated with adjuvant therapy, and a 5-year survival of 8% for surgery alone versus 16% for the adjuvant therapy group (p = .04). Patients having both T3/T4 tumor and positive lymph nodes had a median survival of 9 months with surgery versus 13 months for the adjuvant therapy group, and a 5-year survival of 4% versus 22% (p = .03) for the adjuvant group. Seventy-four patients were evaluable for pattern of relapse. Thirty developed locoregional recurrence; 17 of 38 (45%) in the surgery alone group and 13 of 36 (36%) in the adjuvant therapy group. The improvement in local control in the adjuvant group was totally accounted for by the group receiving both chemotherapy and radiation therapy, in which the recurrence rate was 19%. Statistically significant improvement in the 2-year local control rate was limited to patients with negative surgical margins who received radiation, 93%, versus those who did not, 55% (p = 0.03). The modest improvement in survival seen in patients receiving adjuvant therapy appears to be related to improved local control. No improvement in the rate of distant failure was seen. Chemotherapeutic regimens used seem to be critical in enhancing the effects of radiation in improving local control and survival. Results may be further improved by the extended use of intraoperative radiation.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1992

Adjuvant radiotherapy in high stage transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis and ureter.

This review was undertaken to assess the influence of adjuvant radiation therapy on failure patterns and survival in high stage transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis or ureter. Ninety-four patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis or ureter were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-six had American Joint Commission stage T3 or T4 N0/+, M0 disease and underwent curative resections (median follow-up 13.5 months, range 3-311). Local failure was defined as recurrence in the tumor bed, regional nodes, or ureteral stump. Time to recurrence and survival were calculated from the time of pathologic diagnosis. Variables associated with local failure, distant metastasis, and survival were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis. Seventeen received surgery only, nine received adjuvant radiation therapy (median dose 50 Gy). Local failure occurred in 9 of 17 without and 1 of 9 with adjuvant radiation therapy (p = 0.07). Actuarial 5-year local control was 34% without and 88% with adjuvant radiation therapy. Cox step-wise regression confirmed adjuvant radiation therapy (p = 0.006) and grade (p = 0.006) as significantly associated with local failure. No patients with low grade lesions suffered local failure either with or without adjuvant radiation therapy. High grade lesions had an local failure rate of 15% with and 71% without adjuvant radiation therapy. Metastatic disease occurred in 4 of 9 and 8 of 17 with and without radiation therapy. No significant factors influencing distant failure were identified. Five-year actuarial survival was 44% with and 24% without adjuvant radiation therapy. The survival differences were not statistically significant on univariate or multivariate analysis. High staged transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis or ureter has a substantial local failure risk after surgery alone. Adjuvant radiation therapy markedly reduces this risk but has no impact on distant disease which occurs in approximately 50%. Effective adjuvant therapy will require effective systemic therapy in addition to adjuvant radiation therapy.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Aluminum compounds as vaccine adjuvants.

Aluminum compounds are the only adjuvants used widely with routine human vaccines and are the most common adjuvants in veterinary vaccines also. Though there has been a search for alternate adjuvants, aluminum adjuvants will continue to be used for many years due to their good track record of safety, low cost and adjuvanticity with a variety of antigens. For infections that can be prevented by induction of serum antibodies, aluminum adjuvants formulated under optimal conditions are the adjuvants of choice. It is important to select carefully the type of aluminum adjuvant and optimize the conditions of adsorption for every antigen since this process is dependent upon the physico-chemical characteristics of both the antigens and aluminum adjuvants. Adsorption of antigens onto aluminum compounds depends heavily on electrostatic forces between adjuvant and antigen. Two commonly used aluminum adjuvants, aluminum hydroxide and aluminum phosphate have opposite charge at a neutral pH. The mechanism of adjuvanticity of aluminum compounds includes formation of a depot; efficient uptake of aluminum adsorbed antigen particles by antigen presenting cells due their particulate nature and optimal size (<10 µm); and stimulation of immune competent cells of the body through activation of complement, induction of eosinophilia and activation of macrophages. Limitations of aluminum adjuvants include local reactions, augmentation of IgE antibody responses, ineffectiveness for some antigens and inability to augment cell-mediated immune responses, especially cytotoxic T-cell responses.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2001

National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference statement: adjuvant therapy for breast cancer, November 1-3, 2000.

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to provide health-care providers, patients, and the general public with an assessment of currently available data regarding the use of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. PARTICIPANTS: The participants included a non-Federal, non-advocate, 14-member panel representing the fields of oncology, radiology, surgery, pathology, statistics, public health, and health policy as well as patient representatives. In addition, 30 experts in medical oncology, radiation oncology, biostatistics, epidemiology, surgical oncology, and clinical trials presented data to the panel and to a conference audience of 1000. EVIDENCE: The literature was searched with the use of MEDLINE for January 1995 through July 2000, and an extensive bibliography of 2230 references was provided to the panel. Experts prepared abstracts for their conference presentations with relevant citations from the literature. Evidence from randomized clinical trials and evidence from prospective studies were given precedence over clinical anecdotal experience. CONSENSUS PROCESS: The panel, answering predefined questions, developed its conclusions based on the evidence presented in open forum and the scientific literature. The panel composed a draft statement, which was read in its entirety and circulated to the experts and the audience for comment. Thereafter, the panel resolved conflicting recommendations and released a revised statement at the end of the conference. The panel finalized the revisions within a few weeks after the conference. The draft statement was made available on the World Wide Web immediately after its release at the conference and was updated with the panel's final revisions. The statement is available at http://consensus.nih.gov. CONCLUSIONS: The panel concludes that decisions regarding adjuvant hormonal therapy should be based on the presence of hormone receptor protein in tumor tissues. Adjuvant hormonal therapy should be offered only to women whose tumors express hormone receptor protein. Because adjuvant polychemotherapy improves survival, it should be recommended to the majority of women with localized breast cancer regardless of lymph node, menopausal, or hormone receptor status. The inclusion of anthracyclines in adjuvant chemotherapy regimens produces a small but statistically significant improvement in survival over non-anthracycline-containing regimens. Available data are currently inconclusive regarding the use of taxanes in adjuvant treatment of lymph node-positive breast cancer. The use of adjuvant dose-intensive chemotherapy regimens in high-risk breast cancer and of taxanes in lymph node-negative breast cancer should be restricted to randomized trials. Ongoing studies evaluating these treatment strategies should be supported to determine if such strategies have a role in adjuvant treatment. Studies to date have included few patients older than 70 years. There is a critical need for trials to evaluate the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in these women. There is evidence that women with a high risk of locoregional tumor recurrence after mastectomy benefit from postoperative radiotherapy. This high-risk group includes women with four or more positive lymph nodes or an advanced primary cancer. Currently, the role of postmastectomy radiotherapy for patients with one to three positive lymph nodes remains uncertain and should be tested in a randomized controlled trial. Individual patients differ in the importance they place on the risks and benefits of adjuvant treatments. Quality of life needs to be evaluated in selected randomized clinical trials to examine the impact of the major acute and long-term side effects of adjuvant treatments, particularly premature menopause, weight gain, mild memory loss, and fatigue. Methods to support shared decision-making between patients and their physicians have been successful in trials; they need to be tailored for diverse populations and should be tested for broader dissemination.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2005

Atheroprotective effect of adjuvants in apolipoprotein E knockout mice.

Strategies aimed at treating atherosclerosis by immunization protocols are emerging. Such protocols commonly use adjuvants as non-specific stimulators of immune responses. However, adjuvants are known to modify various disease processes. The aim of this study was to determine whether adjuvants alter the development of atherosclerosis. We performed immunization protocols in apolipoprotein E knockout mice (E degrees ) following chronic administration schedules commonly employed in experimental atherosclerosis. Our results point out a dramatic effect of several adjuvants on the development of atherosclerosis; three of the four adjuvants tested reduced lesion size. The Alum adjuvant, which is the adjuvant currently used in most vaccination protocols in humans, displayed a strong atheroprotective effect. Mechanisms accounting for atheroprotective effect of Freund's adjuvants included their capacity to increase both Th2 responses and anti-MDA-LDL IgM titers, and/or to impose atheroprotective lipoprotein profiles. The present study indicates that adjuvants have potent atheromodulating capabilities, and thus, implies that the choice of adjuvant is crucial in long-term immunization protocols in experimental atherosclerosis.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗
PubMed1999

Postoperative adjuvant therapy for stage II non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Stage II non-small-cell lung cancer is regarded as one of the early lung cancers. Although resection, including the mediastinal lymph nodes, is currently regarded as the standard treatment, the survival rate of this disease is not encouraging. It is well known that the most common causes of death are locoregional recurrences or distant metastases, or both. However, the best adjuvant treatment to improve survival is as controversial an issue as ever. METHODS: This study was designed as a randomized, blinded, two-armed study with operation and adjuvant radiotherapy in one arm, versus operation and adjuvant mitomycin C (10 mg/m2), vinblastine (6 mg/m2), and cisplatin (100 mg/m2) (MVP) chemotherapy in the other arm. We assigned 57 resected patients with pathologic proven stage II non-small cell lung cancer to the groups according to our eligibility criteria. RESULTS: The most common pattern of recurrence was distant metastases, and nearly all the recurrences (17 of 18 patients) in both groups were found within 2 years after operation. The rates of the locoregional and distant metastases were 3.6% and 46.4% in the adjuvant radiotherapy group and 6.9% and 10.3% in the adjuvant chemotherapy group (p = 0.018). The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 52.0% in the adjuvant radiotherapy group and 74.0% in the adjuvant chemotherapy group (p = 0.16, log-rank test). The 2-year, 5-year, and 6-year survival portions were 60.3%, 56.5%, and 28.3% in the adjuvant radiotherapy group, and 82.8%, 70.1%, and 60.1% in the adjuvant chemotherapy group (p = 0.01, p = 0.17, and p = 0.03, Z-test). The difference of the actuarial survival between these two groups was somewhat significant (p = 0.09, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the addition of adjuvant MVP chemotherapy may reduce the distant metastasis rates and prolong the survival of the surgically resected stage II non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy and impact of adjuvant therapy for ampullary carcinomas.

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical outcomes and potential impact of adjuvant chemoradiation in patients undergoing surgical resection of ampullary carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1988 and 1997, 39 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary adenocarcinomas. Clinical and pathologic factors, adjuvant therapy records, and disease status were obtained from chart review. Thirteen (33%) patients received adjuvant chemoradiation. Radiation therapy was delivered to the surgical bed and regional nodes to a median dose of 4,860 cGy with concurrent bolus or continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil. Outcomes measures included locoregional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Univariate analysis was used to assess the impact of various patient- and tumor-related factors and the use of adjuvant therapy. Twenty (51%) patients with tumor invasion into the pancreas (T3) or node-positive disease were classified in a "high-risk" subgroup. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 45 months for survivors, overall 3-year survival was 55%. Survival was significantly worse for patients with positive nodes (23% vs. 73%, p < 0.001) and high-risk status (30% vs. 80%, p = 0.002). Disease-free survival was 54% at 3 years. There were 3 postoperative deaths, and these patients (all high risk) are excluded from further analysis on adjuvant therapy. In univariate analysis, the use of adjuvant chemoradiation had no clear impact on local-regional control or overall survival. However, by controlling for risk status in multivariate analysis, the use of adjuvant therapy reached statistical significance for overall survival (p = 0. 03). Among the high-risk patients, 7 (77%) of 9 patients receiving adjuvant therapy remained disease-free during follow-up compared with only 1 (14%) of 7 patients not receiving adjuvant therapy (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Despite the relatively favorable prognosis of ampullary carcinomas compared with other pancreaticobiliary tumors, patients with nodal metastases or T3 disease are at high risk for disease relapse. The use of adjuvant chemoradiation may improve long-term disease control in these patients.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1985

Fertility control in the bitch by active immunization with porcine zonae pellucidae: use of different adjuvants and patterns of estradiol and progesterone levels in estrous cycles.

To determine the changes in patterns of 17 beta-estradiol and progesterone levels underlying abnormal cycles in bitches immunized with solubilized crude porcine zonae pellucidae (cPZP), to attempt to circumvent these problems by immunizing with a purified zona fraction (pPZP), and to test the effectiveness of different adjuvants, bitches were immunized with cPZP or pPZP 2-6 times with no adjuvant, Freund's adjuvant, alum adjuvant, or the adjuvant CP-20,961. The bitch immunized without adjuvant had a low titer with a normal cycle and fertility. Immunization with cPZP and adjuvant produced moderate to high titers of antizona antibodies and infertility. Bitches with high titers experienced abnormal estrous cycles. Estradiol rose during proestrus, but instead of falling sharply in early estrus as in controls, it remained elevated. Progesterone did not rise. The moderate-titered bitches had normal cycles and steroid patterns. Bitches immunized with pPZP had moderate titers. Cycles were normal after 3 injections, but after 6 injections one bitch had an abnormal cycle. One pPZP-immunized bitch remained fertile but the others were infertile. Alum was the mildest adjuvant, causing no injection site lesions, but the highest titers occurred with Freund's and CP-20,961 adjuvants. All three adjuvants induced titers sufficient to inhibit fertility. Infertility in bitches immunized with PZP may be due to prevention of zona penetration, because their antisera inhibited zona penetration of oocytes by spermatozoa in vitro. However, alterations in ovarian function preventing ovulation and luteinization could be involved in high-titered bitches.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗
PubMed1994

Experimental modulation of the reactivity of pleural milky spots (Kampmeier's foci) by Freund's adjuvants, betamethasone and mycobacterial infection.

We studied the response of milky spots in the parietal pleura of the rat and mouse to intrapleural instillation of immunomodulatory agents such as complete or incomplete Freund's adjuvants and betamethasone, and also to infection by mycobacteria (M. avium). Both incomplete (mineral oil) and complete (mineral oil plus dead mycobacteria) adjuvants, as well as M. avium infection, induced a striking increase in the size and cellularity of the pleural milky spots whereas betamethasone caused a slight atrophy. The extensive inflammatory infiltrates observed after adjuvant injection differed between milky spots reactive to complete and incomplete Freund's adjuvants. Fifteen days after adjuvant administration, the pleural milky spots of rats were still enlarged and hypercellular but differences were noted in the size of milky spots of the pleura between the 2 adjuvant treatments: animals submitted to injection of complete Freund's adjuvant showed an increase in the size of milky spots from d 3 to d 15, while the size of milky spots of the incomplete Freund's adjuvant treated group showed a decrease in size from d 3 to d 15. The milky spots at d 15 were well organised: reticulin fibres permeated the whole area of the milky spot and the different cell types were evenly distributed. Histiocytes, which were previously confined to the inner layer, were now the main cell type in all areas of milky spots. A moderate number of mast cells and a few eosinophils were also seen. Complete Freund's adjuvant caused the formation of granulomas in the milky spots, a change that was not detected in animals treated with incomplete adjuvant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗
PubMed2003

Current and future status of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

Adjuvant systemic treatments have greatly improved the prognosis of women with early breast cancer. Combination chemotherapy and, for patients with oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) tumours, endocrine treatment has been found to reduce the frequency of relapse and improve survival. New adjuvant strategies include the introduction of taxanes into adjuvant chemotherapy schedules, the use of aromatase inhibitors in place of, or in addition to, tamoxifen, and the use of adjuvant bisphosphonates. Combination chemotherapy has been found to reduce the annual odds of recurrence and death in pre- and postmenopausal women. The benefits, however, are on average less in older patients. Anthracycline-based regimens are more effective than traditional regimens of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF). The benefits of adjuvant cytotoxic and endocrine treatments are additive. There is considerable debate as to the role of taxanes in adjuvant therapy. Improved outcome has been observed in one large trial, especially in those patients with ER-negative tumours. High-dose chemotherapy has not fulfilled its early promise. Ovarian suppression and/or tamoxifen remain the treatments of choice. The annual odds of relapse and death have been reduced by approximately one-third and one-quarter, respectively. Several very large studies are in progress to assess the potential of aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting. Direct comparisons with tamoxifen, as well as switching after several years from tamoxifen to an aromatase inhibitor, are strategies under evaluation. Early results from one of these trials evaluating anastrozole (the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination [ATAC] trial) has reported a reduced relapse rate after a median follow-up of 3 years in favour of anastrozole. However, this was at the expense of accelerated bone loss, and strategies to minimise this side effect of aromatase inhibitors are under investigation. Although many studies have indicated that bisphosphonates prevent the development of metastatic bone disease in animals, the clinical role of prophylactic bisphosphonates in early breast cancer is not clearly defined. Three studies with oral clodronate have been published, two of them indicating a protective effect on the development of bone metastases and improved survival, and one suggesting a disadvantage to the use of adjuvant clodronate. Further large adjuvant trials with clodronate and zoledronic acid are in progress. Adjuvant bisphosphonates also have been found to reduce bone loss associated with cancer treatments and preserve skeletal health. It may be possible to replace the current oral regimens for prevention of bone loss with a single annual infusion of the highly potent bisphosphonate zoledronic acid.

Anastrozole↗
PubMed2005

Postprostatectomy adjuvant versus salvage radiotherapy: a complication-adjusted number-needed-to-treat analysis.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy (RT) has been used with success after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP), both in the adjuvant and salvage settings. The purpose of the current investigation was to systematically compare adjuvant versus salvage RT in a manner that incorporates both treatment efficacy and complications. METHODS: A literature review was performed of reports of post-RRP salvage and adjuvant RT, and 12 trials comprising 1060 patients met the appropriate inclusion criteria. The biochemical failure-free survival in each study/arm was tabulated, and these values were entered into a model to compute an unadjusted number-needed-to treat (NNT). RT complications were then considered, accounting for differences in toxicity incidences in the salvage versus adjuvant setting, to compute complication-adjusted NNTs. In all the trials, the signs and magnitudes of the NNTs obtained were used to compare adjuvant with salvage RT. RESULTS: The absolute NNT analysis showed an advantage of adjuvant compared with salvage RT. After adjustment for RT complications, however, the advantage shifted to salvage RT. This transition point from superiority of adjuvant RT to superiority of salvage RT was sensitive to the estimated incidence and severity of RT side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant post-RRP RT was advantageous in comparison to salvage RT if the side effects of RT were estimated to be negligible. However, with moderate incidence/severity of RT side effects, salvage RT was advantageous. The findings herein must be tested in a prospective study in which both health-related quality of life and cancer control are documented in patients receiving adjuvant versus salvage post-RRP RT. Further work is needed to better estimate parameters entered into the model to determine the precise transition point between adjuvant and salvage RT with modern RT techniques.

Humans↗
PubMed2005

The natural history of breast carcinoma in patients with > or = 10 metastatic axillary lymph nodes before and after the advent of adjuvant therapy: a multiinstitutional retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The majority of patients with breast carcinoma with > or = 10 metastatic axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) develop recurrent disease within 5 years from diagnosis. The purpose of the current study, performed retrospectively, was to characterize the natural history of this subset of patients, both before and after the advent of adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy and tamoxifen. METHODS: Retrospectively, patients with primary breast carcinoma (N = 882) with > or = 10 metastatic ALNs, treated between 1954 and 1998, were selected from 3 institutions: The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX); the Institut Gustave Roussy (Villejuif, France); and Hospital Clinico Universitario (Valencia, Spain). All patient data had been registered prospectively in clinical databases. One group consisted of 314 patients treated with locoregional therapy alone (no adjuvant therapy) from 1954 to 1983. The second group included 568 patients who received adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy between 1974 and 1998 with or without adjuvant tamoxifen. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 140 months. Disease-free survival rates at 15 and 20 years for the no adjuvant therapy and adjuvant therapy groups were 17% and 16% versus 26% and 24%, respectively. The overall survival rates at 20 years for the no adjuvant therapy and the adjuvant therapy groups were 9% and 21%, respectively. By multivariate analysis, the independent factors associated with survival in the adjuvant therapy group were tumor size and the number of metastatic lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: The retrospective analysis suggested that adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy and hormonal therapy have altered the natural history in this high-risk group of patients. However, despite such improvements, survival rates remained low, and innovative therapeutic approaches are, therefore, needed to improve clinical outcomes.

Anthracyclines↗
PubMed2005

Potent enhancement of cellular and humoral immune responses against recombinant hepatitis B antigens using AS02A adjuvant in healthy adults.

Recombinant subunit protein vaccines generally elicit good humoral immune responses, weak helper T cell responses and no cytotoxic T cell responses. Certain adjuvants are known to enhance humoral and cellular immune responses. This study evaluated the humoral, CD4+ T helper and CTL responses induced by the recombinant SL* protein adjuvanted with AS02A in comparison with non-adjuvanted SL* in PBS in two groups of 15 healthy adult volunteers. The AS02A adjuvant contains monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL), QS21 and an oil in water emulsion. The adjuvanted vaccine induced fast and vigorous humoral and helper T cell responses of the Th1 type. Using a pool of overlapping 20mer peptides a cytotoxic response was detected in 6 out of 14 HLA-A2-positive (+) and HLA-A2-negative (-) recipients of the adjuvanted vaccine. All HLA-A2-positive subjects in the adjuvanted group and up to 30% of the subjects in the SL* PBS group displayed a CTL response against selected HLA-A2-restricted CD8+ T cell epitopes. The non-adjuvanted vaccine induced a very weak antibody response and no helper T cell responses. Local and general reactions were more frequently reported by AS02A recipients than in the non-adjuvanted group but the safety profile was considered acceptable. AS02A can be considered as a useful adjuvant that strongly enhances the cellular and humoral responses of subunit protein vaccines.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗
PubMed2006

Novel human polysaccharide adjuvants with dual Th1 and Th2 potentiating activity.

Pure soluble, recombinant and synthetic antigens, despite their better tolerability, are unfortunately often much less immunogenic than live or killed whole organism vaccines. Thus, the move towards the development of safer subunit vaccines has created a major need for more potent adjuvants. In particular, there is an urgent need for adjuvants capable of boosting cellular (Th1) immunity but without unacceptable toxicity. The adjuvant activity of aluminium compounds (aluminium phosphate or hydroxide) was first described by Glenny and colleagues in 1926. Surprisingly, despite the description of over one hundred adjuvants in the scientific literature, alum remains the only adjuvant approved for human use in the USA. Unfortunately, alum has no effect on cellular immunity and is faced with increasing concerns regarding potential for cumulative aluminium toxicity. Why then has alum not been replaced in human vaccines? Despite the enormous number of candidates, potency has invariably been associated with increased toxicity, and this more than anything else has precluded their use, particularly in prophylactic vaccines where safety issues are paramount. Hence, there is a major unmet need for a safe efficacious adjuvant capable of boosting cellular plus humoral immunity. The extensive data on inulin-based adjuvants indicate that these are excellent candidates to replace alum as the adjuvant of choice for many vaccines. Particular advantages offered by inulin-based adjuvants is that they induce cellular in addition to humoral immunity and offer excellent safety, tolerability, ease of manufacture and formulation. Thus, adjuvants based on inulin have enormous potential for use in vaccines against both pathogens and cancer.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗