Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Sumatriptan”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

5-HT1B receptor polymorphism and clinical response to sumatriptan.

The 5-HT1 receptor agonist, sumatriptan, is highly effective in the treatment of migraine. Some patients, however, do not respond or experience recurrence of the headache. In addition, some patients report chest symptoms after sumatriptan. We investigated whether these different responses could be attributed to genetic diversity of the 5-HT1B receptor, which most likely mediates the therapeutic action and the coronary side effects of sumatriptan. Allele frequencies of two polymorphisms in the 5-HT1B receptor gene (G861C and T-261G) were investigated in migraine patients with consistently good response to sumatriptan (n = 14), with no response (n = 12), with recurrence of the headache (n = 12), with chest symptoms (n = 13), and in patients without chest symptoms (n = 27). Allele frequencies (G:0.74; C:0.26 at nt 861 and T:0.39; G:0.61 at nt -261) did not differ between patient groups, indicating that genetic diversity of the 5-HT1B receptor does not seem to be involved in the different clinical responses to sumatriptan.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Evidence-based assessment of pregnancy outcome after sumatriptan exposure.

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of best available evidence for tolerability of sumatriptan after inadvertent exposure during pregnancy. BACKGROUND: Migraine's demography suggests that inadvertent exposure to acute therapies is likely during the earliest undiagnosed stages of pregnancy. The tolerability of such therapies under these conditions is not amenable to clinical trial for ethical reasons. In the United States, sumatriptan is currently labeled pregnancy category C (ie, not recommended for use during pregnancy unless the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus). METHODS: Three types of adverse events were studied: spontaneous abortion, fetal abnormality, and obstetric complications. Traditional evidence-based criteria were used to assess a search-protocol product of four clinical studies and two case reports. RESULTS: The single positive finding ("preterm delivery" without low birth weight) was in the smallest study; this study was retrospective and the finding was externally inconsistent with the other three larger studies, all of which were prospective. No study followed children for more than 4 years, which is the period needed to identify the maximum number of congenital anomalies. Rigorous teratological technique was generally not employed. Post hoc power calculations were used to provide parameters of the hazard detectable by these studies in aggregate. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy categories B and C both seem feasible for sumatriptan. Within the limits of the examined studies, there is no evidence for any specific effect of sumatriptan on pregnancy outcome. Patients inadvertently exposed to sumatriptan during an early stage of pregnancy should be reassured by these data.

Abnormalities, Drug-Induced↗
PubMed2003

Efficacy of sumatriptan nasal spray in recurrent migrainous headache: an open prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of sumatriptan 20 mg via nasal spray and 100-mg tablets in treating migrainous headache in patients without a concomitant migraine diagnosis. METHODS: We prospectively investigated the efficacy of sumatriptan 20 mg via nasal spray and 100-mg tablets in patients with a history of at least 5 moderate to severe headache attacks lasting 2 to 72 hours that consistently did not meet the International Headache Society (IHS) criteria for migraine or episodic tension-type headache. RESULTS: Nineteen headache attacks classifiable as migrainous disorder without aura (IHS 1.7) were evaluated in 13 patients using 20-mg sumatriptan nasal spray within a 10-week period. A 2-point decrease in headache severity on a four-point scale was achieved in 74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50% to 89%) of the attacks within 2 hours. The pain-free incidence (a reduction in headache severity from moderate or severe to none) was 37% (95% CI, 17% to 63%) after 2 hours. Ten patients completed the second part of the study, taking oral sumatriptan for 14 migrainous attacks: a 2-point decrease in headache severity was achieved in 38% (95% CI, 13% to 71%) of the attacks within 2 hours and in 77% (95% CI, 48% to 92%) within 4 hours. CONCLUSION: This is the first prospective study to show that intranasal or oral sumatriptan may be effective in patients experiencing moderate to severe headache attacks which consistently do not fulfill the IHS criteria for migraine or episodic tension-type headache.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2003

Sumatriptan in migraine with unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms: an open study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the response to sumatriptan in migraineurs with unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms such as lacrimation, eye redness, eyelid edema, nasal congestion, and rhinorrhea. BACKGROUND: Given the potential large-scale recruitment of peripheral neurovascular 5-HT1B/1D receptors consequent to the activation of the trigeminal autonomic reflex in such patients, the presence of unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms may predict a positive response to sumatriptan. METHODS: Seventy-two consecutive migraineurs with unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms were given sumatriptan 50-mg tablets to treat 1 migraine attack and were asked to record their clinical response to the drug at different time points. End points were pain-relief and pain-free response at 1 and 2 hours. RESULTS: Pain relief was reported by 47 patients (65.3%) at 1 hour and by 59 (81.9%) at 2 hours. Pain-free response was reported by 22 patients (30.6%) at 1 hour and by 44 (61.1%) at 2 hours. Responsiveness to sumatriptan did not correlate with the type or number of unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms, demographic characteristics, prophylactic treatments, use of contraceptives, or concomitant tension-type headache. CONCLUSIONS: Migraineurs with unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms seem to respond to sumatriptan better than other migraineurs. The presence of unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms may predict a positive response to the triptans.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Transient minor improvement of high altitude headache by sumatriptan.

High-altitude headache often fulfills the criteria of migraine. Therefore, we hypothesized that sumatriptan, a 5-HT1 receptor agonist specifically effective for treatment of migraine, would also alleviate high altitude headache. A randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind trial was performed on 29 mountaineers with at least moderate headache on the day of arrival at 4559 m. Fourteen subjects received 100 mg sumatriptan orally and 15 subjects received placebo. Before treatment there were no significant differences between groups regarding rate of ascent, duration and severity of headache, and acute mountain sickness score. All 6 female subjects were randomly assigned to placebo. Absolute values and the reduction of headache scores 1, 3, and 12 h after the administration of sumatriptan did not differ between treatment groups, but headache scores tended to be lower with sumatriptan after 1 or 3 h when compared with placebo. Considering only male mountaineers, there was a significant decrease of headache scores after 1 and 3 h. Because there was only a minor transient amelioration of high altitude headache with sumatriptan, we conclude that 5-HT1 receptors do not play a major role in the pathophysiology of high altitude headache.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

HMO direct costs and health care resources use after implementation of a monthly limit on sumatriptan.

The health care costs and resource use of patients with migraine before and after a quantity limit on sumatriptan was introduced in an HMO were compared. A longitudinal, retrospective review of a medical claims database and a pharmacy claims database was conducted for two six-month periods before and after a monthly limit (four tablets or injections) on sumatriptan reimbursement was instituted at an independent practice association-model HMO in February 1997. Patients with at least one medical claim with a diagnosis code for migraine or at least two pharmacy claims for sumatriptan, methysergide, ergotamine, dihydroergotamine, or an ergotamine combination product in 1996 or 1997 were eligible for inclusion. A total of 557 patients were included in the analysis. Migraine-related medical costs and total medical costs increased 1.5% and 24.4%, respectively; neither change was statistically significant. Physician office visits related to migraine increased by 7.8%. The number of hospital admissions for the cohort increased from three to five, but hospital costs decreased by 55.0%. The overall costs of medications for migraine therapy decreased by 4.5%. There was an 8.2% increase in prescriptions for drugs to treat migraine but a 40.0% decrease in their cost, primarily because of decreased sumatriptan use. There was a 33.9% increase in prescriptions for medications that could be used as prophylaxis for migraine and a 49.6% increase in their cost. Implementation of a monthly limit on sumatriptan decreased an HMO's pharmacy costs but did not significantly alter migraine-related direct medical costs and health care resource use of patients with migraine.

Drug Costs↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Intraoral chilling versus oral sumatriptan for acute migraine.

Migraine pathophysiology is associated with a dural inflammation. Recent evidence suggests that the primary inflammation occurs in a maxillary nerve segment, accessible intraorally. Local tenderness, related to symptom laterality, has been palpated consistently in asymptomatic migraine patients, and significant migraine relief has been obtained from chilling confined to this area. Thirty-five symptomatic episodic migraine patients were enrolled in this study, comparing 40 minutes of bilateral intraoral chilling, 50 mg of oral sumatriptan, and 40 minutes of sham (tongue) chilling. Hollow metal tubes chilled by circulating ice water were held in the maxillary molar periapical areas by the patient. Pain and nausea were recorded at baseline and 1, 2, 4, and 24 hours after start of treatment, using a numeric symptom-relief scale. Significant mean headache relief was obtained by maxillary chilling and sumatriptan at all four time intervals, with poor relief obtained by placebo. Maxillary chilling was more effective than sumatriptan at all four time intervals. Significant nausea relief was obtained by maxillary chilling and sumatriptan at posttreatment and 2 and 4 hours later. At 24 hours, some headache and nausea recurrence was noted with sumatriptan. The repeated-measures analysis of variance indicated that both treatments, drug (P = 0.024) and maxillary chilling (P = 0.001), reduced the headache, as compared with the control group. Tenderness suggests local inflammation associated with vasodilatation and edema. Because chilling can resolve local edema, these findings raise the possibility that an intraoral inflammation may be a factor in migraine etiology.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2004

The anti-migraine agent sumatriptan induces a calcium-dependent discharge in meningeal sensory neurons.

The anti-migraine agent sumatriptan constricts cerebral blood vessels, and also blocks neuropeptide release from meningeal sensory neurons. We investigated whether sumatriptan can also affect neuronal discharge, by recording the activity of dural primary afferent neurons during dural application of sumatriptan in anesthetized rats. Sumatriptan (0.24-24 microM) induced a concentration-dependent increase in ongoing discharge. The discharge occurred only in the presence of calcium. The suppressive effect of calcium removal was not a result of a general decrease in excitability, because calcium removal produced a pronounced increase in mechanically evoked discharge. The excitatory effect on dural afferent discharge might underlie the initial worsening of the headache that can occur following sumatriptan administration, prior to the subsequent onset of headache relief.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

The neuroendocrine effects of sumatriptan, a specific ligand for 5-HT1-like receptors.

OBJECTIVE: A relationship between the serotoninergic and the opiatergic system in the pathogenesis of head pain is supported by several data. This study was carried out to investigate the neuroendocrine effects of sumatriptan, a specific serotonin agonist used in the treatment of migraine, on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (PHA) hormones. DESIGN: Two consecutive studies were performed. In study A, eight subjects received a subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of sumatriptan (6 mg). In study B, a further six subjects were randomized to receive either sumatriptan or placebo. SUBJECTS: Healthy volunteers recruited within the staff (eight males and six females) were studied. MEASUREMENT: In study A, plasma cortisol and PRL were measured by direct RIA and beta-endorphin after extraction and chromatography. Samples were collected from 60 minutes before to 120 minutes after the administration of the drug, at 15-minute intervals. According to the data of the first study, in study B, in addition to cortisol and beta-endorphin, ACTH was also measured. RESULTS: Significant increases in the mean beta-endorphin and cortisol concentrations were found in every subject receiving sumatriptan, while no significant changes were observed in prolactin plasma levels. Study B confirmed the activation of the pituitary-adrenal axis, additionally demonstrating the release of ACTH, and indicated that placebo has no effects. CONCLUSION: Acute s.c. stimulation with sumatriptan activates the pituitary-adrenal axis.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗
PubMed2004

Switching patients with migraine from sumatriptan to other triptans increases primary care costs.

Treatment of migraine with triptans is highly effective, although cost considerations may prompt a change in therapy. This retrospective database analysis of 3196 patients with migraine, established on sumatriptan therapy, found that 54% of the 292 experiencing a triptan switch returned to sumatriptan within 15 months, suggesting that the alternative was less acceptable. Excluding patients with unusually high use of triptans (> or = 208 tablets/year), switching therapy resulted in a significant increase of pounds sterling 53/patient in total costs, compared with patients continuing on sumatriptan (p = 0.014). Cost savings (pounds sterling 17/patient over 15 months) were observed only among the 41% of patients in whom the initial switch was successful and did not result in a further switch or return to sumatriptan. Among patients who were relatively low cost initially, switching resulted in increased costs, irrespective of the outcome. This study suggests that there is no economic justification for switching from sumatriptan to another triptan.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Efficacy and tolerability of sumatriptan tablets administered during the mild-pain phase of menstrually associated migraine.

Two randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled clinical trials were conducted to assess the efficacy of sumatriptan tablets, 50mg and 100mg, for treatment during the mild-pain phase of a menstrually associated migraine among patients who typically experienced moderate to severe migraine preceded by an identifiable phase of mild pain. Subjects (n = 403 in Study 1 and n = 349 in Study 2) treated one menstrually associated migraine on an outpatient basis. The results demonstrate that sumatriptan tablets, 50 mg or 100 mg, were significantly more effective than placebo at conferring pain-free response 1 h and 2 h post-dose; migraine-free response (i.e. no pain and no associated symptoms) 2 h post-dose; returning patients to normal functioning 2 h post-dose; and conferring sustained freedom from pain from 2 through 24 h post-dose. Although the studies were not designed or statistically powered to show differences between the sumatriptan doses, a trend for slightly higher efficacy was observed for the 100-mg dose compared with the 50-mg dose on many measures. Both doses of sumatriptan were well-tolerated. The only adverse events reported in more than 2% of subjects in a treatment group were nausea, paresthesia, dizziness and malaise/fatigue, all of which were reported at incidences comparable to or slightly higher than those with placebo. Considered in the context of other findings, these data suggest that--with menstrually associated migraine as with non-menstrual migraine--optimal therapeutic benefit of sumatriptan tablets may be realised when they are administered during the mild-pain phase of an attack rather than delaying treatment until headache is moderate or severe.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

The 5-HT1-like agonist sumatriptan has a significant effect in chronic tension-type headache.

Subcutaneous treatment of chronic tension-type headache with 2 mg and 4 mg sumatriptan, a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine1-like receptor agonist, was compared with placebo in a double-blind crossover study of 36 patients. The effect was evaluated using a 6-point verbal relief rating scale and by visual analog scale ratings of headache intensity before and for 2 h after treatment. Sumatriptan induced a modest but significantly greater headache relief than placebo, whereas no significant difference was found between the two doses of sumatriptan. Headache relief following sumatriptan was significant after 60 min and still seemed to be increasing after 120 min when the examination terminated. Three possible mechanisms of action of sumatriptan in tension-type headache are discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Effects of acute or chronic administration of anti-migraine drugs sumatriptan and zolmitriptan on serotonin synthesis in the rat brain.

Triptans are 5-HT1 receptor agonists used as anti-migraine drugs. They act primarily on meningeal blood vessels and on trigeminovascular afferents, but they may also exert central effects. We studied the regional effects of acute and chronic treatment with sumatriptan or zolmitriptan on the rate of serotonin (5-HT) synthesis in the rat brain, using the alpha-14C-methyl-L-tryptophan quantitative autoradiographic method. Sumatriptan at low (300 microg/kg, s.c.) and high (1 mg/kg) doses, as well as zolmitriptan (100 microg/kg), acutely decreased (15-40%, P < 0.05-0.001) 5-HT synthetic rate in many brain regions, including the dorsal raphe nucleus. Chronically, sumatriptan (21 days, approximately 300 microg/kg per day via osmotic minipumps) induced significant increases in the 5-HT synthesis rate in many projection areas but had no effect in the dorsal raphe nucleus. The acute effects on 5-HT synthesis rate would be compatible with activation of 5-HT1 autoreceptors that inhibit serotonin release. In contrast, the increased 5-HT synthesis rate observed after chronic sumatriptan might possibly result from a down-regulation/desensitization of 5-HT1 receptors and/or unmasking of excitatory triptan-sensitive 5-HT receptors. Overall, the present findings indicate that not only zolmitriptan but also sumatriptan affect brain serotonergic neurotransmission.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Comparison of rizatriptan 5 mg and 10 mg tablets and sumatriptan 25 mg and 50 mg tablets.

This randomized, double-blind, two-attack, placebo-controlled, crossover study explored the efficacy and tolerability of rizatriptan 10 mg compared with sumatriptan 50 mg as well as rizatriptan 5 mg compared with sumatriptan 25 mg in the acute treatment of migraine. Following randomization to one of six possible treatment sequences, patients (n = 1447) treated two sequential attacks, of moderate or severe intensity, separated by at least 5 days. Patients assessed pain severity, migraine-associated symptoms, and functional disability at 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 h post treatment. Compared with placebo, all treatments were effective. On the primary endpoint of time to pain relief, rizatriptan 10 mg was not statistically different from sumatriptan 50 mg [odds ratio (OR) 1.10, P = 0.161], and rizatriptan 5 mg was statistically superior to sumatriptan 25 mg (OR 1.22, P = 0.007). In general, rizatriptan 10 mg and 5 mg treatment resulted in improvement compared with the corresponding doses of sumatriptan on measures of pain severity, migraine symptoms, and functional disability and the 5-mg dose reached statistical significance on almost all measures. All treatments were generally well tolerated.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Sumatriptan (5-HT1B/1D-agonist) causes a transient allodynia.

Unpleasant sensory symptoms are commonly reported in association with the use of 5-HT1B/1D-agonists, i.e. triptans. In particular, pain/pressure symptoms from the chest and neck have restricted the use of triptans in the acute treatment of migraine. The cause of these triptan induced side-effects is still unidentified. We have now tested the hypothesis that sumatriptan influences the perception of tactile and thermal stimuli in humans in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study. Two groups were tested; one consisted of 12 (mean age 41.2 years, 10 women) subjects with migraine and a history of cutaneous allodynia in association with sumatriptan treatment. Twelve healthy subjects (mean age 38.7 years, 10 women) without migraine served as control group. During pain- and medication-free intervals tactile directional sensibility, perception of dynamic touch (brush) and thermal sensory and pain thresholds were studied on the dorsal side of the left hand. Measurements were performed before, 20, and 40 min after injection of 6 mg sumatriptan or saline. Twenty minutes after injection, sumatriptan caused a significant placebo-subtracted increase in brush-evoked feeling of unpleasantness in both groups (P < 0.01), an increase in brush-evoked pain in migraineurs only (P = 0.021), a reduction of heat pain threshold in all participants pooled (P = 0.031), and a reduction of cold pain threshold in controls only (P = 0.013). At 40 min after injection, no differences remained significant. There were no changes in ratings of brush intensity, tactile directional sensibility or cold or warm sensation thresholds. Thus, sumatriptan may cause a short-lasting allodynia in response to light dynamic touch and a reduction of heat and cold pain thresholds. This could explain at least some of the temporary sensory side-effects of triptans and warrants consideration in the interpretation of studies on migraine-induced allodynia.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Sumatriptan causes parallel decrease in plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) concentration and migraine headache during nitroglycerin induced migraine attack.

Sumatriptan-induced changes in plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) concentration and headache intensity were investigated in 19 female migraineurs during nitroglycerin-induced migraine attack. Sumatriptan nasal spray was administered 120 min after the onset of the attack. Blood samples were obtained immediately before and 60 min after sumatriptan administration. In those subjects whose migraine attack improved considerably 60 min after the treatment the plasma CGRP concentration decreased significantly (P<0.05). In contrast, plasma CGRP concentration failed to change in patients whose headache did not improve. In addition, plasma CGRP concentrations showed significant positive correlations with the headache scores both 60 and 120 min after sumatriptan administration (P<0.05). According to our results plasma CGRP concentration decreases parallel to headache intensity during sumatriptan treatment and this decrease in CGRP predicts effectiveness of antimigraine drug therapy. This supports that one of the main effects of triptans is to decrease CGRP release.

Biomarkers↗
PubMed2006

The risks of sumatriptan administration in patients with unrecognized subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH).

Administration of sumatriptan in subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) patients, misdiagnosed as migraine patients, may induce symptomatic cerebral vasospasm with potentially dangerous consequences. Over a 5-year period, we observed three patients with a 3-15-year history of migraine, who received sumatriptan for acute headache. Two patients received 6 mg sumatriptan subcutaneously on days 4 and 6, and one patient 3 x 100 mg sumatriptan orally on day 1 after an acute headache episode. In all three cases, an alleviation of headache intensity from severe to moderate was observed. When headache recurred and meningeal signs appeared, SAH was diagnosed by computed tomography in all three cases. No neurological deficits occurred during the further course of the disease. In both patients with a SAH caused by an aneurysm, transcranial Doppler sonography demonstrated vasospasm of the basal cerebral arteries. An antinociceptive effect of sumatriptan can be observed in SAH patients in good clinical condition, which suggests a specific craniovascular antinociceptive action. This may lead to misdiagnosis as migraine and delayed appropriate diagnosis and treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Contractile responses evoked by dihydroergotamine, naratriptan and sumatriptan in the canine isolated coronary artery.

Contractile responses evoked by the 5-HT IB/D receptor agonists, dihydroergotamine, naratriptan and sumatriptan, were compared in canine isolated coronary artery rings before and after endothelial dysfunction as obtained by inhibition of nitric oxide synthase with Nw-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME; 10 microM). The three agonists contracted rings in the potency order of dihydroergotamine (geometric mean pD2 value with 95% confidence limits in parentheses: 6.9 [5.3-7.9] and 7.0 [5.4-7.3] in the absence and presence of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibition [I], respectively) > or = naratriptan (6.8 [5.7-7.3] and 6.4 [5.7-6.6]) > sumatriptan (4.8 [3.6-5.6] and 5.0 [3.6-5.6]) independently of the presence or absence of L-NAME. In absence of L-NAME, efficacy, as assessed by the mean maximal contractile response (Emax), tended to be greater, although not significantly, for sumatriptan and naratriptan compared to dihydroergotamine. L-NAME per se markedly increased developed tension (43.0 +/- 4.6 mN; n = 50) and potentiated maximal responses (0.6 +/- 0.2 and 10.7 +/- 2.4 mN for dihydroergotamine in the absence and presence of L-NAME respectively; 1.7 +/- 0.6 and 18.7 +/- 3.7 mN for naratriptan; 2.5 +/- 0.6 and 21.3 +/- 3.8 mN for sumatriptan; P < 0.01 in each case). Emax values of sumatriptan and naratriptan were greater than those produced by dihydroergotamine in the presence of L-NAME but remained lower than the sub-maximal contractile responses evoked by the thromboxane A2 analogue, U-46619 (ie, 32.4 +/- 5.2 mN in the absence of L-NAME; n = 50), or L-NAME per se. In conclusion, 5-HT IB/D receptor agonist efficacies in contracting coronary arteries are relatively low under basal conditions and are potentiated in the presence of a dysfunctional endothelium, whereas agonist potencies remain unaffected.

Animals↗