Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Shear Strength”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Shear bond strength of composite resin cements to lithium disilicate ceramics.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of different commercial composite resin cement systems to lithium disilicate all-ceramic substrate. Five adhesive resin cement systems Panavia 21 and Panavia F (Kuraray), Variolink 2 (Ivoclar-Vivadent), RelyX Unicem Applicap and RelyX ARC (3M ESPE) were used on all-ceramic (IPS Empress 2; Ivoclar-Vivadent) substrate. Shear bond strength of adhesive resin cement to substrate was tested after thermocycling, or without thermocycling (n = 10). Substrate surfaces of the specimen after loading were SEM microscopically examined. The highest bond strengths in water stored conditions were obtained with RelyX ARC (28.7 +/-3.9 MPa), while in thermocycled conditions the highest bonding values were obtained with Variolink 2 (23.2 +/- 7.5 MPa). The lowest values in both water stored (5.8 +/- 4.0 MPa) and thermocycled (2.4 +/- 2.9 MPa) conditions were obtained with Panavia 21. Shear bond strengths appeared to be affected significantly by thermocycling (anova, P < 0.05). It was concluded that there were significant differences between the bond strengths of adhesive resin cements to lithium disilicate substrate.

Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate↗
PubMed1983

Multiaxial strength characteristics of trabecular bone.

Bovine trabecular bone specimens were tested in multiaxial stress, including pure shear, in a special test device. Shear strength was proportional to apparent density to the exponent 1.65, in approximate agreement with theoretical and experimental studies on the shear strengths of porous foams. The mean shear strength was 6.60 +/- 1.66 MPa, after normalizing for apparent density. This compares well with normalized shear strengths from Saha and Gorman's (1981) study on human femora. A scanning electron microscope study indicated random trabecular architecture and a complex fracture mechanism at the level of the individual trabecular struts. Hoffmann's (1967) 3-D isotropic failure criterion was applied to the multiaxial test data, along with data from uniaxial compression tests, indicating a compressive strength approximately three times the tensile strength.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

[Shear bond strength of glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bracket bonding].

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer used for orthodontic bracket bonding. METHODS: 30 extracted premolars were evenly divided into two groups. Edgewise brackets (Orsu) were bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer (Advance) in group one and with composite resin (DM) in group two. The shear bond strengths of two materials were tested by material testing machine after 24 hours. The adhesive remnant index was scored after debonding. RESULTS: The shear bong strengths of resin-modified glass ionomer and composite resin were (6.862 +/- 2.142) MPa and (7.183 +/- 3.205) MPa respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer had reached the same level of composite resin. It had the prospect of clinic use.

Composite Resins↗
PubMed2005

Effects of salicylic-lactic acid conditioner on the shear bond strength of brackets and enamel surfaces.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of salicylic-lactic (SL) acid conditioner on the shear bond strength of brackets. Fluoride releasing (Light-bond) and non-fluoride releasing (Enlight) composite adhesives were used after conditioning with 0.22% salicylic + 9% lactic acid or 34% phosphoric acid. Composite adhesives were light cured with either a halogen light curing (HLC) unit for 30-50 s or a plasma arc curing (PAC) unit for 4 s. The shear bond strength was measured with an Instron. Failure modes of debonded brackets were identified based on adhesive remnants on the bracket and tooth. Salicylic-lactic acid conditioning was found to provide adequate shear bond strength. Groups conditioned with SL acid were debonded mainly at the enamel-resin interface and comparatively clean enamel surface after debonding was observed than those conditioned with phosphoric acid. Using confocal laser scanning microscopic examinations, it was found that demineralization patterns between SL acid and phosphoric acid conditioned groups were not different when the same adhesive was used. The SL acid conditioner did not reduce the demineralization. Light-bond adhesive showed less demineralization than Enlight adhesive. The PAC unit can be recommended as an alterative to the HLC unit because it significantly reduces the irradiation time.

Acid Etching, Dental↗
PubMed1996

Shear bond strengths of three resin cements used with three adhesive primers for metal.

This study compared the durability and shear bond strengths of combinations of three adhesive primers and three resin cements bonded to silver-palladium-copper-gold (Ag-Pd-Cu-Au) and cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) alloys. The adhesive luting cements Imperva Dual, Panavia 21, and Super-Bond C&B and the adhesive primers Metal Primer material, V-Primer material, and Cesead Opaque Primer material were used. The application of Metal Primer material was effective in improving the shear bond strengths between each of the three resin cements and Ag-Pd-Cu-Au alloy compared with nonprimed specimens. Co-Cr alloy primed with Cesead Opaque Primer, followed by cementation with Imperva Dual or Super-Bond C&B luting cements yielded the strongest shear bond strengths after 50,000 thermocycles, and Panavia 21 cement did not reveal any significant differences in bond strengths between nonprimed specimens and those primed with Cesead Opaque Primer at all thermocycles.

Adhesives↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Thermal and mechanical load cycling on microleakage and shear bond strength to dentin.

This study evaluated the influence of mechanical and thermal cycling on microleakage at the cervical margins of proximal slot restorations and shear bond strength on flat dentin surfaces. Microleakage Evaluation: One hundred and twenty slot cavity restorations were performed on bovine incisors. The restorations were randomly divided into four groups (n = 30): control (no thermal and mechanical load cycling), thermal cycling (2,000 cycles, 5 degrees C-55 degrees C), mechanical load cycling (50,000-80N) and thermal and load cycling (2,000 5 degrees C-55 degrees C/50,000-80N). The specimens were sealed with acid resistant varnish, leaving a 1-mm window around the cervical margin interface. To detect marginal leakage, a 2% methylene blue buffered solution was used for four hours. The specimens were sectioned longitudinally and qualitatively evaluated by stereomicroscopy (45x) following a ranked score for the dentin cervical margin. The data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test (alpha = 0.05). Shear Bond Strength Evaluation (SBS): Eighty bovine incisors were embedded and polished to obtain a flat standard surface on dentin. The surfaces were restored with Single Bond adhesive system and a resin composite subsequently inserted in a bipartite Teflon matrix. The specimens were randomly divided into the four groups (n = 20) described above for microleakage. Shear bond strengths were measured in a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute. The data were analyzed by one way ANOVA test (alpha = 0.05). No statistically significant influence of thermocycling, mechanical load cycling or the combination was observed for both microleakage and shear bond strength.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2006

An investigation of the shear bond strength of compomer restorative material to enamel and dentine.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of one step adhesives on the shear bond strength of a compomer restorative material to both enamel and dentine. Human extracted teeth were used for the study. Ten samples were prepared for both enamel and dentine specimens for each of the five groups: Tooth, no etch, Prime and Bond NT (P+B NT); tooth, Non-Rinse Conditioner (NRC), P+B NT; tooth, NRC, Prime and Bond 2.1 (P+B 2.1); tooth, etch, P+B NT; tooth, etch, P+B 2.1. The specimens were subjected to bond testing. The shear bond strength was measured using an Inston 1193 testing machine using a cross head speed of 1 mm/minute. The specimens were tested to destruction. The results show that for the enamel specimens the highest bond strength was recorded for those specimens subjected to Etch, P+B 2.1 (22.1 MPa) and Etch P+B NT (20.0 MPa). The groups of specimens which did not undergo etching had very low bond strengths ranging from 11.4 MPa for NRC, P+B 2.1, 8.5 MPa for NRC P+B NT to 6.9 MPa for P+B NT. For the dentine specimens, for all of the groups, the shear bond strengths were low. Those groups subjected to etching produced the highest values of 7.9 MPa for NRC P+B 2.1 with the lowest value of 6.1 MPa for NRC P+B NT. These bond strengths were significantly lower than those achieved for bonding to enamel. Prime and Bond NT and Prime and Bond 2.1, used in conjunction with acid etching, produce satisfactory bond strengths of compomer restorative material to enamel. Bond strengths to dentine were low.

Adhesiveness↗
PubMed2006

Shear bond strengths of different substrates bonded to lithium disilicate ceramics.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strengths of pre- and untreated resin core materials to lithium disilicate ceramics. Bond strengths to dental hard tissues served as controls. Ceramic cubes (IPS-Empress II) were luted either with a one-step (Variolink II/Excite DSC) or multiple-step total etching bonding system (Tetric Flow/Syntac Classic) to ground surfaces of human enamel, dentin, and resin core materials (Clearfil Core, Multicore). Resin core materials were additionally pretreated with hydrofluoric acid (HF) or were silica-coated (CoJet System). Shear bond strengths were determined after 24-hour water storage (n=10) and thermocycling (TC) (n=10; 2000 cycles, 5-55 degrees C, 30 seconds). Bond strengths to enamel, dentin, and silica-coated composites were significantly higher compared to untreated and HF-pretreated composites (p<0.05; Tukey B). Indeed, silica coating of the composite resins significantly increased the bond strength to ceramics (p<0.05; Tukey B). Due to the lower bond strength values of ceramics to untreated composite resins (as compared to enamel and dentin), any indication for a resin core build-up prior to the preparation of a ceramic restoration should be considered carefully.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed2005

Effect of antimicrobial monomer-containing adhesive on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.

A new antibacterial and fluoride-releasing bonding system consists of a self-etching primer that contains an antibacterial monomer and a bonding agent that contains sodium fluoride. This study was to determine the effect of using this new adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Forty molar teeth were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 20 teeth that were etched for 15 seconds with 35% phosphoric acid, washed with a water spray for 10 seconds, and dried to a chalky white appearance, and the sealant was applied to the etched surface. The precoated brackets were placed on the teeth and light cured. Group 2 consisted of 20 teeth that were etched with 35% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds as suggested by the manufacturer when bonding to intact enamel. The teeth were washed with a water spray for 10 seconds and dried to a chalky white appearance, and the primer containing antibacterial monomer was applied to the etched surface, left for 20 seconds, and sprayed with a mild airstream. The adhesive was applied to each tooth, and the precoated bracket was placed and light cured. There were no significant differences (P = .220) in the shear bond strengths of the two groups. The mean shear bond strength for the antibacterial fluoride-releasing adhesive was 11.7 +/- 5.6 MPa and for the control was 9.6 +/- 5.0 MPa. The use of an antibacterial fluoride-releasing adhesive system did not affect the shear bond strength of the orthodontic brackets within the first half hour after initial bonding.

Adhesives↗
PubMed2006

Shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement with saliva present and different enamel pretreatments.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement in a saliva-contaminated environment, using different enamel pretreatments. A total of 125 freshly extracted, bovine permanent inferior incisors were divided into five groups. Group I received 10% polyacrylic acid, moistened with saliva/Fuji Ortho LC (FOLC); group II received 37% phosphoric acid, moistened with saliva/FOLC; group III was moistened with saliva/ FOLC, without acid etching; group IV received 10% polyacrylic acid, not moistened with saliva/ FOLC; and group V was used as a control with 37% phosphoric acid/dry/Transbond XT. After the bonding procedures, all samples were thermocycled, tested in a shear mode on a testing machine, and the Adhesive Remnant Index was evaluated. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) tests indicated that group V yielded the highest shear bond strength (4.09 MPa) but with no statistically significant difference from group II (3.88 MPa). There were no statistically significant differences between groups I, III, and IV (2.84, 2.90, and 3.22 MPa, respectively) (P > or = .05). In groups I, II, IV, and V, where enamel was etched, more than 50% of the samples showed that all material adhered to the teeth surfaces. This was opposed to group III, where the bond failure was mostly between the enamel interface and the bonding material. The results indicated that in a saliva-moistened environment, FOLC achieved higher shear bond strength when 37% phosphoric acid is used, with no statistically significant difference from Transbond XT.

Acid Etching, Dental↗
PubMed2005

Orthodontic bracket shear bond strengths produced by two high-power light-emitting diode modes and halogen light.

The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets cured with two different high-power light-emitting diode (LED) polymerization modes with traditional halogen polymerization. A total of forty-five extracted human premolar teeth were randomly divided into three groups. Each group consisted of 15 teeth mounted in an acrylic block. Following a standard enamel etching protocol, orthodontic brackets were cured on the first group of teeth with fast-mode LED, the second group with soft-start mode LED, and on the last group with a halogen light. After bonding, the shear bond strengths of the brackets were tested with a universal testing machine. The results showed that brackets cured with soft-start mode LED produced the highest shear bond strengths (23.86 +/- 6.20 MPa). No significant difference was found between fast-mode LED (17.14 +/- 5.75 MPa) and the halogen group (17.38 +/- 5.41 MPa) (P > .05). The LED is effective for bonding metal brackets to teeth, and the soft-start mode gives higher bond strengths than the fast mode.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2003

Evaluation of shear bond strength of composite to porcelain according to surface treatment.

This study evaluated the shear bond strength of porcelain/composite using 40 metal + porcelain + composite cylindrical specimens divided into 4 groups, according to porcelain surface treatment: 1) no treatment, 2) mechanical retentions performed with diamond burs, 3) etching with phosphoric acid+silane, and 4) etching with hydrofluoric acid+silane. After being stored in distilled water at room temperature for one week, the specimens were submitted to a shear force (load) and the data were analyzed statistically (ANOVA). The means (in Mpa) of the groups were: 4.71 (group 1); 4.81 (group 2); 11.76 (group 3); 11.07 (group 4). There were no statistically significant differences between groups 1 and 2 and between groups 3 and 4.

Acid Etching, Dental↗
PubMed2005

Shear bond strength of adhesive systems to enamel and dentin. Thermocycling influence.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the this study was to evaluate the influence of thermocycling on shear bond strength on bovine enamel and dentin surfaces of different adhesive systems. METHODS: Thirty sound bovine incisors were sectioned in mesiodistal and inciso-cervical direction obtaining 60 incisal surfaces (enamel) and 60 cervical surfaces (dentin). Specimens were randomly assigned to 3 groups of equal size (n=40), according to the adhesive system used: I-Single Bond; II-Prime & Bond NT/NRC; III-One Coat Bond. After 24-h storage in distilled water at 37 degrees C, each main group was divided into two subgroups: A-specimens tested after 24 h storage in distilled water at 37 degrees C; B-specimens submitted to thermocycling (500 cycles). Shear bond strength tests were performed. Data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey test. RESULTS: Means (MPa) of different groups were: I-AE-16.96, AD-17.46; BE-21.60, BD-12.79; II-AE-17.20, AD-11.93; BE-20.67, BD-13.94; III-AE-25.66, AD-17.53; BE-24.20, BD-19.38. SIGNIFICANCE: Thermocycling did not influence significantly the shear bond strength of the tested adhesive systems; enamel was the dental substrate that showed larger adhesive strength; One Coat Bond system showed the best adhesive strength averages regardless of substrate or thermocycling.

Adhesiveness↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The effect on shear bond strength of rewetting dry dentin with two desensitizers.

The difficulty related to achieving a balance between wet and dry dentin makes the dentin bonding technique extremely sensitive. This study evaluated the effect of rewetting dried dentin with two commercial desensitizing agents (Protect and HurriSeal) on the dentin shear bond strength of three total-etch dentin bonding agents (Syntac Single-Component, OptiBond Solo Plus and Prime & Bond NT) and compared both to applying these same bonding agents to moist dentin and dry dentin. Each bonding agent was paired with an appropriate resin composite from the same manufacturer (Table 1). Recently extracted, formalin-treated caries-free human molars were used. The occlusal surface of each tooth was ground to create a flat dentin surface. Then, each tooth was mounted in acrylic. Twelve groups (n = 15) were prepared: 1) Syntac Single-Component with Heliomolar resin composite (SSC/H) to moist dentin; 2) SSC/H to dry dentin; 3) SSC/H to dried dentin rewet with Protect; 4) SSC/H to dried dentin rewet with HurriSeal; 5) OptiBond Solo Plus with Point 4 resin composite (OBS+/P4) to moist dentin; 6) OBS+/P4 to dry dentin; 7) OBS+/P4 to dried dentin rewet with Protect; 8) OBS+/P4 to dried dentin rewet with HurriSeal; 9) Prime & Bond NT with TPH Spectrum resin composite (PBNT/TPH) to moist dentin; 10) PBNT/TPH to dry dentin; 11) PBNT/THP to dried dentin rewet with Protect and 12) PBNT/TPH to dried dentin rewet with HurriSeal. Groups 1, 5 and 9 were placed according to manufacturers' instructions (moist dentin) as control groups. All the other groups received a 15-second air blast after etching and prior to applying the one bottle adhesive or desensitizer and one bottle adhesive. Resin composite cylinders [4 mm in diameter and 2 mm in height] were then placed. The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours prior to thermocycling 2,500 times (at 8 degrees C and 48 degrees C). Shear bond strengths (SBSs) were measured one week after fabrication by using a circular knife-edge and crosshead speeds of 0.5 mm/minute. Failure modes of debonded specimens were determined under a stereomicroscope (30x). Failed specimens with the low and high shear bond strengths in each group were evaluated under a low vacuum Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM-LV). One-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests were used to compare the different conditions for each bonding system. In the Syntac Single-Component bonding agent groups, there was no significant difference in shear bond strength between the control (15.73 MPa), dry (18.11 MPa) and HurriSeal (16.18 MPa) specimens. Protect specimens showed significantly lower shear bond strength (6.39 MPa). In the OptiBond Solo Plus bonding agent groups, there was no significant difference between the control (20.79 MPa) and the HurriSeal (21.29 MPa) groups, and both groups had significantly greater bonds than the dry (14.13MPa) and Protect (9.57 MPa) groups. In the Prime & Bond NT bonding agent groups, the shear bond strength of the HurriSeal group (20.73 MPa) was significantly higher than the other groups: control (8.05 MPa), dry (5.73 MPa) and Protect (5.45 MPa).

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed2004

The effect of nonvital bleaching on the shear bond strength of composite resin using three adhesive systems.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of nonvital bleaching on the shear bond strength of composite resin using three adhesive systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred seventy bovine teeth were assigned to 3 groups (n = 90): SP, paste of sodium perborate and water; CP, 37% carbamide peroxide; CO, control group (no treatment). After the bleaching treatment, the teeth in each group were cut into enamel (E) and dentin (D) sections. The teeth were embedded in polyester resin and polished in order to obtain a flat E or D surface. Each group was divided into 6 subgroups (n = 15) according to substrate (E and D) and adhesive system: SB, Single Bond (solvent: water/alcohol); PB, Prime & Bond NT (solvent: acetone); CLF, Clearfil SE Bond (solvent: water). The adhesive system was applied on each flat surface according to the manufacturer's instructions and a cylinder of composite resin Z-250 was overlaid. The specimens were stored in distilled water for 7 days at 37 degrees C. The SBS test was performed in a universal testing machine with crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The data obtained (in MPa) were statistically analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < or = 0.05). RESULTS: The bleaching treatment influenced the SBS, regardless of the adhesive system used. On enamel, the SP and CP bleaching treatments reduced the SBS values. On dentin, the SP bleaching agent reduced the SBS values, but the CP bleaching did not. CONCLUSION: Nonvital bleaching treatment with sodium perborate may adversely affect shear bond strength of composite resin for both enamel and dentin. Similar effects can be expected from 37% carbamide peroxide bleaching agent on enamel but not dentin bonding strength. The use of water/alcohol and acetone-based adhesive systems cannot reverse the effects of bleaching treatments on bond strengths.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2005

Effect of LED curing on the microleakage, shear bond strength and surface hardness of a resin-based composite restoration.

To determine the effect of Light emitting diode (LED) curing on dental resins, microleakage, shear bond strength and surface hardness of a dental composite cured with different LEDs were determined and compared with conventional halogen curing. For microleakage, Class V cavities were restored with Esthet-X, divided into groups, and exposed to one of the curing protocols (Elipar Freelight in soft start and standard modes; Ultra-Lume 2; Spectrum 800). Standard dye penetration tests were performed and the data summarised in a 2-way contingency table of observed frequencies. The Chi-square test was used (p<0.05) to test for significant differences between the lights. For surface hardness, samples of Esthet-X were exposed to the light-curing units (LCUs). Vickers hardness was determined on the upper and the bottom surfaces. Data was subjected to statistical analysis using ANOVA (p<0.05). Shear bond strength was determined using a push out method. Comparisons (ANOVA, p<0.05) were made between the different curing protocols. No significant difference in microleakage could be demonstrated between the different LCUs at the enamel side (p=0.60). At the dentin side only the Elipar Freelight (soft start), could significantly reduce microleakage (p<0.01). The hardness score for the halogen light was significantly lower than for the LED lights (p<0.01). The Spectrum 800 and the Elipar Freelight (soft start) have significantly higher shear bond strengths than the others (p<0.01). It was concluded that the LED source is more efficient for a comparable overall power output.

Adhesiveness↗
PubMed2006

Effect of chlorhexidine application on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of study was to assess the effect of chlorhexidine application on the shear bond strength and bond failure site of a resin-modified glass ionomer (Fuji Ortho LC, GC Europe, Leuven, Belgium). METHODS: Forty-five bovine permanent mandibular incisors were randomly divided into 3 groups of 15. Group 1 had no chlorhexidine treatment and served as the control; groups 2 and 3 had chlorhexidine application immediately before and 1 week before bonding, respectively. Stainless steel brackets (DB, Leone, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy) were bonded with the resin-modified glass ionomer. After bonding, all samples were stored in distilled water for 24 hours and subsequently tested in a shear mode on a testing machine. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Scheffé test were applied to determine significant differences in the shear bond strength values, and the chi-square test was used to determine significant differences in the adhesive remnant index scores among the groups. Significance for all statistical tests was predetermined at P < .05. RESULTS: Group 1 (no chlorhexidine application) showed significantly higher shear bond strength values than group 2 (chlorhexidine applied immediately before bonding). No significant differences were found between groups 1 and 3 (chlorhexidine applied 1 week before bonding). Moreover, significant differences in debond locations were found among the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Chlorhexidine application immediately before bonding significantly lowered the bond strength values of Fuji Ortho LC but did not affect its bond strength when applied 1 week before bonding.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed1999

Shear bond strength of techniques for bonding esthetic veneers to metal.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: New composites with improved qualities have been introduced to the dental profession as alternatives to porcelain. There is concern about the strength and reliability of new metal-resin bonding systems when these composites are used as esthetic veneers over metal frameworks. PURPOSE: This in vitro study compared the shear bond strength of 2 metal-resin bonding techniques with the bond strength of conventional porcelain fused-to-metal (PFM). Effects of water storage and thermocycling were also evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety disks, cast in a medium gold, high noble PFM alloy, were divided equally into 6 groups, and received 3 treatments for veneering: conventional feldspathic porcelain on 1 group, and a composite (Artglass) bonded to the metal, using 2 metal-resin bonding techniques. Specimens were tested in shear, half of them after a 24-hour dry storage at room temperature and the rest after 10-day storage in normal saline solution at 37 degrees C and thermocycling. Fractured specimens were evaluated under x10 magnification to determine the nature of failure. Statistical analysis was performed with 2-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: Mean shear bond strength values before and after wet storage and thermocycling were 29.66 and 22.91 MPa for the PFM group; 21.43 and 17.92 MPa for the Siloc group; and 19.34 and 15.64 for the etched group, respectively. The PFM group exhibited significantly higher bond strength values compared with the other 2 groups (P<.001). All groups showed a significant decrease in bond strength values after wet storage and thermocycling (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Wet storage and thermocycling caused a significant decrease in shear bond strength of all specimens. Shear bond strength of conventional feldspathic PFM was significantly higher than that of the 2 metal-resin bonding techniques tested. The 2 latter techniques did not reveal any statistically significant differences.

Analysis of Variance↗