Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “REPRESSION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Differential regulation of transcription: repression by unactivated mitogen-activated protein kinase Kss1 requires the Dig1 and Dig2 proteins.

Kss1, a yeast mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), in its unphosphorylated (unactivated) state binds directly to and represses Ste12, a transcription factor necessary for expression of genes whose promoters contain filamentous response elements (FREs) and genes whose promoters contain pheromone response elements (PREs). Herein we show that two nuclear proteins, Dig1 and Dig2, are required cofactors in Kss1-imposed repression. Dig1 and Dig2 cooperate with Kss1 to repress Ste12 action at FREs and regulate invasive growth in a naturally invasive strain. Kss1-imposed Dig-dependent repression of Ste12 also occurs at PREs. However, maintenance of repression at PREs is more dependent on Dig1 and/or Dig2 and less dependent on Kss1 than repression at FREs. In addition, derepression at PREs is more dependent on MAPK-mediated phosphorylation than is derepression at FREs. Differential utilization of two types of MAPK-mediated regulation (binding-imposed repression and phosphorylation-dependent activation), in combination with distinct Ste12-containing complexes, contributes to the mechanisms by which separate extracellular stimuli that use the same MAPK cascade can elicit two different transcriptional responses.

Calcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinases↗
PubMed1999

A mechanism for Rb/p130-mediated transcription repression involving recruitment of the CtBP corepressor.

Previous work has demonstrated the critical role for transcription repression in quiescent cells through the action of E2F-Rb or E2F-p130 complexes. Recent studies have shown that at least one mechanism for this repression involves the recruitment of histone deacetylase. Nevertheless, these studies also suggest that other events likely contribute to E2F/Rb-mediated repression. Using a yeast two-hybrid screen to identify proteins that specifically interact with the Rb-related p130 protein, we demonstrate that p130, as well as Rb, interacts with a protein known as CtIP. This interaction depends on the p130 pocket domain, which is important for repression activity, as well as an LXCXE sequence within CtIP, a motif previously shown to mediate interactions of viral proteins with Rb. CtIP interacts with CtBP, a protein named for its ability to interact with the C-terminal sequences of adenovirus E1A. Recent work has demonstrated that the Drosophila homologue of CtBP is a transcriptional corepressor for Hairy, Knirps, and Snail. We now show that both CtIP and CtBP can efficiently repress transcription when recruited to a promoter by the Gal4 DNA binding domain, thereby identifying them as corepressor proteins. Moreover, the full repression activity of CtIP requires a PLDLS domain that is also necessary for the interaction with CtBP. We propose that E2F-mediated repression involves at least two events, either the recruitment of a histone deacetylase or the recruitment of the CtIP/CtBP corepressor complex.

Alcohol Oxidoreductases↗
PubMed2000

Repression of human papillomavirus oncogenes in HeLa cervical carcinoma cells causes the orderly reactivation of dormant tumor suppressor pathways.

Most cervical carcinomas express high-risk human papillomaviruses (HPVs) E6 and E7 proteins, which neutralize cellular tumor suppressor function. To determine the consequences of removing the E6 and E7 proteins from cervical cancer cells, we infected HeLa cells, a cervical carcinoma cell line that contains HPV18 DNA, with a recombinant virus that expresses the bovine papillomavirus E2 protein. Expression of the E2 protein resulted in rapid repression of HPV E6 and E7 expression, followed approximately 12 h later by profound inhibition of cellular DNA synthesis. Shortly after E6/E7 repression, there was dramatic posttranscriptional induction of p53. Two p53-responsive genes, mdm2 and p21, were induced with slightly slower kinetics than p53 and appeared to be functional, as assessed by inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase activity and p53 destabilization. There was also dramatic posttranscriptional induction of p105(Rb) and p107 after E6/E7 repression, followed shortly thereafter by induction of p130. By 24 h after infection, only hypophosphorylated p105(Rb) was detectable and transcription of several Rb/E2F-regulated genes was dramatically repressed. Constitutive expression of the HPV16 E6/E7 genes alleviated E2-induced growth inhibition and impaired activation of the Rb pathway and repression of E2F-responsive genes. This dynamic response strongly suggests that the p53 and Rb tumor suppressor pathways are intact in HeLa cells and that repression of HPV E6 and E7 mobilizes these pathways in an orderly fashion to deliver growth inhibitory signals to the cells. Strikingly, the major alterations in the cell cycle machinery underlying cervical carcinogenesis can be reversed by repression of the endogenous HPV oncogenes.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Glucocorticoids repress NF-kappaB-driven genes by disturbing the interaction of p65 with the basal transcription machinery, irrespective of coactivator levels in the cell.

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are used to combat inflammatory diseases. Their beneficial effect relies mainly on the inhibition of NF-kappaB- and/or AP-1-driven proinflammatory gene expression. Previously, we have shown that GCs repress tumor necrosis factor-induced IL-6 gene expression by an NF-kappaB-dependent nuclear mechanism without changing the DNA-binding capacity of NF-kappaB or the expression levels of the cytoplasmic inhibitor of NF-kappaB (IkappaB-alpha). In the present work, we investigate the effect of GC repression on different natural and/or recombinant NF-kappaB-driven reporter gene constructs in the presence of increasing amounts of various coactivator molecules, such as CREB-binding protein (CBP), p300, and SRC-1. We found that GCs maintain their repressive capacities, irrespective of the amount of cofactor present in the cell. Similar results were obtained for the reciprocal transrepression of a GC receptor (GR) element-driven reporter gene by p65. We demonstrate that neither the expression levels of p65 and CBP nor their physical association are affected by activated GR. Using Gal4 chimeras, we show that repression by GCs is specific for p65-mediated transactivation, ruling out competition for limiting nuclear factors as the major underlying mechanism of gene repression. In addition, the transactivation potential of a point-mutated Gal4-p65 variant with a decreased CBP interaction capability is still repressed by GR. Finally, we present evidence that the specificity of GC repression on p65-driven gene expression is codetermined by the TATA box context.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1995

c-Myb repression of c-erbB-2 transcription by direct binding to the c-erbB-2 promoter.

The c-myb proto-oncogene product (c-Myb) is a transcriptional activator that can bind to the specific DNA sequences. Although c-Myb also represses an artificial promoter containing the Myb binding sites, natural target genes transcriptionally repressed by c-Myb have not been identified. We have found that the human c-erbB-2 promoter activity is repressed by c-Myb or B-Myb in a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase co-transfection assay. Domain analyses of c-Myb suggested that Myb represses the c-erbB-2 promoter activity by competing with positive regulators of the c-erbB-2 promoter. In in vitro transcription assays, Myb proteins containing only the DNA binding domain could repress c-erbB-2 promoter activity. Two Myb binding sites in the c-erbB-2 promoter were critical for transcriptional repression by c-Myb. One of the two Myb binding sites overlaps the TATA box, and DNase I footprint analyses indicated that c-Myb can compete with TFIID. These results suggest that Myb-induced trans-repression of the c-erbB-2 promoter partly involves competition between Myb and TFIID.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1998

Transcriptional activity of heat shock factor 1 at 37 degrees C is repressed through phosphorylation on two distinct serine residues by glycogen synthase kinase 3 and protein kinases Calpha and Czeta.

Heat shock factor 1 (HSF1) is the key transcriptional regulator of the heat shock genes that protect cells from environmental stress. However, because heat shock gene expression is deleterious to growth and development, we have examined mechanisms for HSF1 repression at growth temperatures, focusing on the role of phosphorylation. Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) of the ERK family phosphorylate HSF1 and represses transcriptional function. The mechanism of repression involves initial phosphorylation by MAP kinase on serine 307, which primes HSF1 for secondary phosphorylation by glycogen synthase kinase 3 on a key residue in repression (serine 303). In vivo expression of glycogen synthase kinase 3 alpha or beta thus represses HSF1 through phosphorylation of serine 303. HSF1 is also phosphorylated by MAPK in vitro on a second residue (serine 363) adjacent to activation domain 1, and this residue is additionally phosphorylated by protein kinase C. In vivo, HSF1 is repressed through phosphorylation of this residue by protein kinase Calpha or -zeta but not MAPK. Regulation at 37 degrees C, therefore, involves the action of three protein kinase cascades that repress HSF1 through phosphorylation of serine residues 303, 307, and 363 and may promote growth by suppressing the heat shock response.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed2001

Biochemical analysis of transcriptional repression by Drosophila histone deacetylase 1.

To study the mechanisms by which deacetylases regulate transcription by RNA polymerase II, we investigated the biochemical properties of purified recombinant Drosophila histone deacetylase 1 (dHDAC1, also known as dRPD3). We found that purified dHDAC1 and Gal4-dHDAC1 polypeptides possess substantial deacetylase activity. Thus, deacetylation by dHDAC1 does not require any additional cofactors. Gal4-dHDAC1, but not dHDAC1, was observed to repress transcription in vitro by about 2-3-fold from chromatin templates, but not from naked DNA templates, in a Gal4 site-dependent manner. This magnitude of repression is similar to that commonly seen by deacetylases in vivo, as assessed by treatment of cells with deacetylase inhibitors. Transcriptional repression by Gal4-dHDAC1 was blocked by the deacetylase inhibitor, FR901228, and thus, deacetylase activity correlates with repression. Single round transcription analyses showed that Gal4-dHDAC1 reduces the absolute number of productive initiation complexes with chromatin templates. Moreover, with chromatin templates that were assembled with completely purified components, Gal4-dHDAC1 was found to deacetylate nucleosomal histones as well as to repress transcription. These experiments provide biochemical evidence for the requirement of chromatin for transcriptional repression by dHDAC1 and further show that dHDAC1 acts to repress the transcription initiation process.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

PML-RARalpha alleviates the transcriptional repression mediated by tumor suppressor Rb.

A fusion between the promyelocytic leukemia (PML) protein and the retinoic acid receptor-alpha (RARalpha) results in the transforming protein of acute promyelocytic leukemia, PML-RARalpha. PML has growth-suppressive properties and is localized within distinct nuclear structures referred to as nuclear bodies. PML participates in numerous cellular functions, including transcriptional activation, apoptosis, and transcriptional repression, whereas PML-RARalpha blocks these functions. However, the role played by PML-RARalpha in leukemogenesis remains unclear. Here we report that PML is required for transcriptional repression mediated by the tumor suppressor Rb. Rb interacts with the histone decaetylase (HDAC) complex containing co-repressors and represses the transcription of the E2F target genes. Overexpression of PML enhanced Rb-mediated repression. The degree of Rb-mediated repression was weakened by injecting anti-PML antibodies and was lower in Pml-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts. PML-RARalpha inhibited Rb-mediated repression, and two co-repressor-interacting sites on the PML-RARalpha molecule were required for this activity. Furthermore, PML-RARalpha blocked the interaction between Rb and HDAC. Thus, aberrant binding of PML-RARalpha to co-repressor-HDAC complexes may inhibit their association with Rb, resulting in the abrogation of Rb activity. Thus, the disruption of Rb-mediated repression may be a contributory factor in leukemogenesis.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

p130/E2F4 binds to and represses the cdc2 promoter in response to p53.

p53 represses the transcription of cdc2 and cyclin B1, causing loss of Cdc2 activity and G(2) arrest. Here we show that the region -22 to -2 of the cdc2 promoter called the R box is required for repression by p53 but not for basal promoter activity. The R box confers p53-dependent repression on heterologous promoters and binds to p130/E2F4 in response to overexpression of p53. R box-dependent repression requires p21/waf1, and overexpression of p21/waf1 also represses the cdc2 promoter. These observations suggest that p53 represses the cdc2 promoter by inducing p21/waf1, which inhibits cyclin-dependent kinase activity, enhancing the binding of p130 and E2F4, which together bind to and repress the cdc2 promoter.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2002

Salt-inducible kinase represses cAMP-dependent protein kinase-mediated activation of human cholesterol side chain cleavage cytochrome P450 promoter through the CREB basic leucine zipper domain.

Salt-inducible kinase (SIK), one of the serine/threonine protein kinases, was transiently expressed in Y1 cells during the early phase of the ACTH/cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA)-mediated signal transduction. The overexpression of SIK(N), the SIK's N-terminal kinase domain, repressed the expression of the side chain cleavage cytochrome P450 (CYP11A) gene. To elucidate the mechanism of the repression by SIK, several CYP11A promoter constructs were tested for the promoter activities in the presence of PKA and/or SIK(N). A cAMP-response element (CRE)-like sequence present in the promoter was shown to be responsible not only for the PKA-mediated promoter activation but also for the SIK(N)-mediated repression. When the Gal4 DNA binding domain-linked full-length CRE-binding protein (CREB) construct was cotransfected with Gal4 reporter gene, SIK(N) repressed the PKA-induced reporter gene expression. However, SIK(N) could not repress the PKA-induced reporter activity conferred by Gal4 DNA binding domain-linked basic leucine zipper (bZIP)-less CREB or bZIP-disrupted CREB. On the other hand, SIK(N) could repress the kinase-inducible domain-disrupted CREB-dependent reporter gene expression in the presence of PKA. The in vitro kinase reaction studies showed that SIK(N) could not phosphorylate CREB, and PKA failed to phosphorylate SIK(N). Taken together, these results suggest that SIK(N), cooperating with PKA, may act on the CREB's bZIP domain and repress the CREB-mediated transcriptional activation of the CYP11A gene.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2002

SHP1 protein-tyrosine phosphatase regulates HoxA10 DNA binding and transcriptional repression activity in undifferentiated myeloid cells.

The homeodomain protein HoxA10 interacts with negative cis elements to repress gene transcription in undifferentiated myeloid cells. The CYBB and NCF2 genes, which encode the gp91(PHOX) and p67(PHOX) proteins, are two such HoxA10 target genes. During interferon gamma-induced myeloid differentiation, tyrosine phosphorylation decreases HoxA10 DNA binding affinity and transcriptional repression. Therefore, decreased HoxA10 repression contributes to increased CYBB and NCF2 transcription in differentiating myeloid cells. The current studies investigate modulation of HoxA10 repression activity during myelopoiesis. We determine that phosphorylation of tyrosine residues in the conserved homeodomain decreases HoxA10-DNA binding. We also determine that interaction of the homeodomain phosphotyrosine residues with an adjacent domain in the HoxA10 protein is necessary for decreased DNA binding affinity. Since SHP1 protein-tyrosine phosphatase antagonizes myeloid differentiation and decreases CYBB and NCF2 transcription, we investigated the influence of SHP1-protein-tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) on HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation. We find that SHP1-PTP activity increases HoxA10 target gene repression in undifferentiated myeloid cells. Consistent with this, SHP1-PTP interacts with HoxA10 and decreases homeodomain-tyrosine phosphorylation. These investigations suggest that SHP1-PTP activity, in undifferentiated myeloid cells, influences HoxA10 repression of myeloid-specific genes. Therefore, increased HoxA10 repression of myeloid gene transcription is a molecular mechanism for SHP1 inhibition of myeloid differentiation.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

p73 independent of c-Myc represses transcription of platelet-derived growth factor beta-receptor through interaction with NF-Y.

We recently reported that c-Myc represses the transcription of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) beta-receptor (Izumi, H., Molander, C., Penn, L. Z., Ishisaki, A., Kohno, K., and Funa, K. (2001) J. Cell Sci. 114, 1533-1544). We demonstrate here that the p53 family protein p73alpha represses PDGF beta-receptor transcription essentially by the same mechanism. p73alpha but not p73beta or p53 represses the transcription in concordance with its ability to bind NF-YC and NF-YB. None of other p73 isoforms (i.e. p73beta, p73gamma, p73epsilon), C-terminal deletion mutants of p73alpha, and p53 is able to bind NF-Y with the exception of p63alpha. This finding suggests that the sterile alpha-motif domain present only in p73alpha and p63alpha is the interaction site. For the repression, the N-terminal transactivation domain of p73alpha is also indispensable, arguing for the importance of the activity of p73alpha in the mechanism. p73alpha binds the C-terminal HAP domain of NF-YC previously found to be the interaction site with c-Myc and TBP. Because c-Myc induces and activates p73alpha (Zaika, A., Irwin, M., Sansome, C., and Moll, U. M. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 11310-11316) and they bind each other (Uramoto, H., Izumi, H., Ise, T., Tada, M., Uchiumi, T., Kuwano, M., Yasumoto, K., Funa, K., and Kohno, K. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, in press), we examined whether the repression by p73 is dependent on c-Myc. However, Myc-null rat fibroblasts are also susceptible to p73alpha-induced repression. Serum stimulation of NIH3T3 cells gradually decreased the amount of endogenous NF-Y binding to the PDGF beta-receptor promoter, whereas NF-YA expression in the nuclear extracts remains unchanged. Our results indicate that serum stimulation induces c-Myc and p73alpha, leading to the down-regulation of PDGF beta-receptor expression by repressing its transcription.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed2002

Two different signals regulate repression and induction of gene expression by glucose.

In addition to being the universal carbon and energy source, glucose also regulates gene expression in many organisms. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae glucose regulates gene expression via two different pathways known as the glucose repression and glucose induction pathways. The signal for glucose induction of hexose transporter (HXT) genes is generated via two glucose-transporter like molecules, Snf3 and Rgt2. A strain lacking both sensors is unable to induce HXT gene expression and is defective in glucose uptake. The snf3 rgt2 double mutant is also defective in glucose repression of transcription, raising the possibility that Snf3 and Rgt2 are also involved in generating the glucose repression signal. In this report, I show that induction and repression of gene expression by glucose in yeast is regulated by two independent signals. While the signal for induction of HXT gene expression is generated by Snf3 and Rgt2 glucose receptors, the repression signal requires the uptake and metabolism of glucose. In addition, the glucose induction of the HXT genes is required for repression of gene expression by glucose. Therefore the glucose repression defect of the snf3 rgt2 strain is indirect and is due to the lack of glucose uptake in this double mutant.

Biological Transport↗
PubMed2003

Functional characterization of an amino-terminal region of HDAC4 that possesses MEF2 binding and transcriptional repressive activity.

Like the full-length histone deacetylase (HDAC) 4, its amino terminus (amino acids 1-208) without the carboxyl deacetylase domain is also known to effectively bind and repress myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2). Within this repressive amino terminus, we further show that a stretch of 90 amino acids (119-208) displays MEF2 binding and repressive activity. The same region is also found to associate specifically with HDAC1 which is responsible for the repressive effect. The amino terminus of HDAC4 can associate with the DNA-bound MEF2 in vitro, suggesting that it does not repress MEF2 simply by disrupting the ability of MEF2 to bind DNA. In vivo, MEF2 induces nuclear translocation of both the full-length HDAC4 and HDAC4-(1-208), whereas the nuclear HDAC4 as well as HDAC4-(1-208) in turn specifically sequesters MEF2 to distinct nuclear bodies. In addition, we show that MyoD and HDAC4 functionally antagonize each other to regulate MEF2 activity. Combined with data from others, our data suggest that the full-length HDAC4 can repress MEF2 through multiple independent repressive domains.

Active Transport, Cell Nucleus↗
PubMed2003

Ume1p represses meiotic gene transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through interaction with the histone deacetylase Rpd3p.

Ume1p is a member of a conserved protein family including RbAp48 that associates with histone deacetylases. Consistent with this finding, Ume1p is required for the full repression of a subset of meiotic genes during vegetative growth in budding yeast. In addition to mitotic cell division, this report describes a new role for Ume1p in meiotic gene repression in precommitment sporulating cultures returning to vegetative growth. However, Ume1p is not required to re-establish repression as part of the meiotic transient transcription program. Mutational analysis revealed that two conserved domains (NEE box and a WD repeat motif) are required for Ume1p-dependent repression. Co-immunoprecipitation studies revealed that both the NEE box and the WD repeat motif are essential for normal Rpd3p binding. Finally, Ume1p-Rpd3p association is dependent on the global co-repressor Sin3p. Moreover, this activity was localized to one of the four paired amphipathic-helix domains of Sin3p shown previously to be required for transcriptional repression. These findings support a model that Ume1p binding to Rpd3p is required for its repression activity. In addition, these results suggest that Rpd3-Ume1p-Sin3p comprises an interdependent complex required for mediating transcriptional repression.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2003

Evidence that C promoter-binding factor 1 binding is required for Notch-1-mediated repression of activator protein-1.

Cell fate determination in invertebrate and vertebrate systems is regulated by the Notch signaling pathway. Four mammalian Notch genes, Notch 1-4, encode differentially expressed transmembrane receptors. The canonical Notch pathway involves proteolytic liberation of the Notch-1 intracellular domain (NIC-1), which activates CSL (CBF1, Su(H), and Lag-1)-mediated transactivation. We showed previously that NIC-1 also represses activator protein-1 (AP-1)-mediated transactivation. The N-terminal RAM (RBP-Jkappa associated molecule) domain of NIC-1 was required for both activation and repression. To investigate the mechanism of AP-1 repression, we tested whether distinct sequences within the RAM domain mediate activation versus repression. We analyzed the capacity of RAM domain mutants to bind endogenous CBF1, to activate CSL-mediated transactivation, and to repress AP-1. A mutant lacking 20 amino acids of the RAM domain (Delta1759-1778) resembled the RAM domain deletion mutant in being defective in all activities. Analysis of 14 deletion and alanine substitution mutants revealed a correlation between CBF1 binding, CSL-mediated transactivation, and AP-1 repression. Stably transfected K562 cells could only tolerate very low level expression of wild-type NIC-1 and NIC-1 mutants retaining activation/repression activities. By contrast, transcriptionally compromised NIC-1 mutants accumulated at high levels. These results support a model in which the binding of NIC-1 to CBF1 is required for AP-1 repression and reveal a powerful cell-sensing mechanism that suppresses the levels of transcriptionally competent NIC-1.

Alanine↗
PubMed2003

Repression by TTK69 of GAGA-mediated activation occurs in the absence of TTK69 binding to DNA and solely requires the contribution of the POZ/BTB domain of TTK69.

tramtrack 69 (TTK69) is known to repress GAGA-mediated activation of the eve promoter in S2 cells. Here, we show that repression by TTK69 occurs in the absence of bona fide TTK69-binding sites on the template, indicating that it does not require the binding of TTK69 to DNA. Consistent with this interpretation, the POZ/BTB domain of TTK69, which does not bind DNA, is sufficient for repression. Moreover, a fusion protein in which the POZ/BTB domain of GAGA is replaced by that of TTK69 is not capable of activating the eve promoter but efficiently represses GAGA-dependent activation. Repression involves GAGA-TTK69 interaction because TTK69 is not capable of repressing basal transcription. Most probably, GAGA-TTK69 interaction occurs at the promoter because GAGA.TTK69 complexes are fully competent in binding DNA in vitro. Our results also show that repression by TTK69 of GAGA-dependent activation of the eve promoter is not mediated by any of the co-repressors known to interact with TTK69 (dMi2 or C-terminal binding protein) or by trichostatin A-sensitive histone deacetylases. Altogether, these observations strongly suggest that the binding of TTK69 prevents the interaction of GAGA with the transcription machinery and, therefore, compromises its activation potential.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Major histocompatibility class II transactivator (CIITA) mediates repression of collagen (COL1A2) transcription by interferon gamma (IFN-gamma).

Interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) plays an important role during inflammation by repressing collagen and activating major histocompatibility class II (MHC-II) expression. Activation of MHC-II by IFN-gamma requires regulatory factor for X-box 5 (RFX5) complex as well as class II transactivator (CIITA). We have shown that the RFX family binds to the COL1A2 transcription start site, and the RFX5 complex represses COL1A2 gene expression during IFN-gamma response. In this report, we demonstrate that CIITA is a key mediator of COL1A2 repression by IFN-gamma. IFN-gamma up-regulates the expression of CIITA in a time-dependent manner in lung fibroblasts and promotes CIITA protein occupancy on COL1A2 transcription start site in vivo as judged by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays. There are coordinate decreases in the occupancy of RNA polymerase II on the collagen transcription start site with increasing CIITA occupancy during IFN-gamma treatment. In addition, we are able to specifically knockdown the IFN-gamma-stimulated expression of CIITA utilizing short hairpin interference RNA (shRNA) against CIITA. This leads to the alleviation of COL1A2 repression and MHC-II activation by IFN-gamma. RFX5 recruits CIITA to the collagen site as evidenced by DNA affinity chromatography. The presence of RFX5 complex proteins enhances the collagen repression by CIITA reaching levels occurring during IFN-gamma treatment. Co-expression of CIITA with deletion mutations and collagen promoter constructs demonstrates that CIITA represses collagen promoter mainly through its N-terminal region including the acidic domain and the proline/serine/threonine domain. Our data suggest that CIITA is a crucial member of a repressor complex responsible for mediating COL1A2 transcription repression by IFN-gamma.

Animals↗