Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Propranolol”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19Linked to original sources

Racial differences in propranolol pharmacokinetics.

Racial differences in the antihypertensive response to propranolol are well documented. This study was conducted to determine whether differences between black subjects and white subjects in propranolol enantiomer pharmacokinetics and protein binding exist that may contribute to the response differences. Twenty-six healthy men (13 black and 13 white subjects) took 80 mg propranolol orally three times daily for 16 doses. Serum samples were collected for 12 hours after the last dose for analysis by chiral HPLC. Protein binding was determined by equilibrium dialysis. Area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) for both propranolol enantiomers was lower in black subjects than in white subjects (e.g., l-propranolol AUC: 292 +/- 100 versus 394 +/- 121 ng.hr/ml, p less than 0.05) and apparent oral clearance was higher in black subjects than in white subjects (e.g., l-propranolol apparent oral clearance: 27.6 +/- 8.2 versus 20.6 +/- 7.0 ml/min/kg, p less than 0.05). Fraction unbound and unbound AUC were not statistically different between black subjects and white subjects for either enantiomer, although the lack of statistical significance may have been attributable to the small sample size. In summary, racial differences in unbound l-propranolol concentration probably do not explain the clinically observed differences in response to propranolol. However, the racial differences in apparent oral clearance suggest there may be racial differences in hepatic metabolism of propranolol.

Administration, Oral↗

Propranolol metabolism in normal subjects: association with sex steroid hormones.

The objective of this study was to determine the potential role of circulating testosterone and estradiol in regulation of the activity of the sex-dependent pathways of propranolol metabolism (i.e., alpha-naphthoxylactic acid and propranolol glucuronide). The pharmacokinetics of a single 80 mg oral dose of propranolol and the plasma levels of the sex steroid hormones were therefore determined in normal volunteers. In 33 young men there was a positive correlation between the testosterone levels and the propranolol clearances through both alpha-naphthoxylactic acid (p < 0.001) and propranolol glucuronide (p < 0.002), as well as the total clearance (p < 0.05), but not through aromatic ring hydroxylation. Testosterone cypionate administration led to an increased clearance of propranolol through alpha-naphthoxylactic acid in nine of the 11 men studied, further supporting a stimulatory effect of testosterone on propranolol metabolism. In 23 young women there was no significant association between the circulating levels of either estradiol or testosterone and any of the clearances of propranolol. These observations may be clinically relevant for propranolol therapy and may provide improved insight into the influence of gender and circulating gonadal hormones on drug metabolism in humans.

Adult↗

The effects of endoscopic variceal ligation and propranolol on portal hypertensive gastropathy: a prospective, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic treatment of esophageal varices may accentuate portal hypertensive gastropathy. The impact of the combination of band ligation and propranolol on this condition remains unknown. METHODS: Patients with history of variceal bleeding were randomized to receive band ligation alone (control group, 40 patients) or a combination of band ligation and propranolol (propranolol group, 37 patients). Serial endoscopic evaluation of gastropathy was performed. Gastropathy was classified into 3 grades and scored as 0, 1, or 2. RESULTS: Before endoscopic treatment, 17% of the control group and 22% of the propranolol group had gastropathy (p = 0.78). The occurrence of gastropathy after endoscopic treatment was significantly higher in the control group than in the propranolol group (p = 0.002). Serial endoscopic follow-up revealed that the mean gastropathy score was significantly higher in the control group than in the propranolol group (p < 0.05). In patients with gastropathy the gastropathy score reached a peak at 6 months after endoscopic treatment in both the control and propranolol groups (85% vs. 48%, respectively). After variceal obliteration, accentuation of gastropathy was significant in the control group (p < 0.01) but not in the propranolol group. Gastropathy was less likely to develop in patients who developed gastric varices. Esophageal variceal recurrence was not related to the development of gastropathy after variceal obliteration with banding. Only one patient in the control group bled from gastropathy. CONCLUSION: Band ligation of esophageal varices may accentuate gastropathy, which in this study was partly relieved by propranolol.

Adult↗

Hemodynamic effects of propranolol and nitrates in cirrhotics with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt.

BACKGROUND: The combination of tailored TIPS with vasoactive drugs might allow reduction of the rate of subsequent shunt-related sequelae. METHODS: We studied cirrhotic patients 8 weeks (median) after TIPS insertion (8-10 mm) for variceal bleeding. Nitrate (0.1 mg/kg) and propranolol (0.15 mg/kg) alone or combined (same dosages) were infused (I h) sequentially at 1-h intervals (n = 17). Similarly, propranolol was randomly compared to placebo (NaCl, n = 14). We measured mean arterial pressure (MAP, mmHg), heart rate (HR) and portal pressure gradient (PPG: portal minus central venous pressure) prior to and after drugs. RESULTS: Propranolol reduced PPG (mean +/- s, mmHg) significantly (14.8 +/- 3.7 versus 12.1 +/- 3.7; -21% +/- 10%; P < 0.001), while nitrates alone (14.3 +/- 3.4 versus 13.7 +/- 3.4; -11% +/- 3%; P=0.06) or nitrates plus propranolol (12.9 +/- 4 versus 12.4 +/- 4; -7% +/- 8%; P=0.2) induced only minor additive effects on portal pressure. However, nitrate reduced MAP (P < 0.001) and increased HR (P < 0.01), whereas propranolol reduced only HR (P < 0.001) with unchanged MAP, and the combination decreased MAP (P < 0.001). Compared to placebo (no effect), propranolol decreased PPG (14.4 +/- 5.6 versus 11.1 +/- 5.5; -23% +/- 11%; P < 0.001) and HR (P < 0.001). Overall, most patients (92%) responded to propranolol and 54% showed a marked PPG decrease (>20%). CONCLUSIONS: Propranolol significantly reduced portal pressure in cirrhotic patients after TIPS, whereas nitrates induced only minor benefit. TIPS-treated patients might therefore profit from additive propranolol therapy allowing limited shunts to be applied initially and/or to reduce the need for TIPS revisions in the case of shunt-dysfunction during follow-up.

Blood Pressure↗

Effects of digoxin, propranolol, and verapamil on exercise in patients with chronic isolated atrial fibrillation.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the effects of digoxin, propranolol, and verapamil on exercise in patients with chronic isolated atrial fibrillation. DESIGN: Patients with chronic isolated atrial fibrillation underwent maximal exercise testing before and after the administration of digoxin, propranolol, or verapamil. Heart rate, oxygen uptake and oxygen pulse were observed at rest, at gas exchange anaerobic threshold, and at peak exercise. SUBJECTS: The subjects were 10 patients (aged 48-78 years, mean age 60, SD 9, years) with chronic isolated atrial fibrillation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During exercise without medication, the heart rate was 85 (SD 8) beats.min-1 at rest, 127(19) at the level of anaerobic threshold, and 175(17) at peak exercise. With digoxin, heart rate was reduced to 75(9) beats.min-1 at rest (control v digoxin, p less than 0.01). However, reduction of heart rate was not seen at anaerobic threshold or at peak exercise. With propranolol, heart rate was 63(7) beats.min-1 at rest, 99(16) at anaerobic threshold, and 138(28) at peak exercise (control v propranolol, all p less than 0.01). Heart rate with verapamil was 70(13) beats.min-1 at rest, 107(30) at anaerobic threshold, and 138(28) at peak exercise (control v verapamil, p less than 0.05 at rest and at anaerobic threshold, p less than 0.01 at peak exercise. Neither digoxin, nor propranolol, nor verapamil changed the oxygen uptake during exercise. Without medication, oxygen pulse was 6.5(2.0) ml.beat-1 at anaerobic threshold and 7.7(2.1) ml.beat-1 at peak exercise. With digoxin, the change of oxygen pulse, versus without medication, was not significant at rest or at anaerobic threshold but was increased at peak exercise, at 8.3(2.1) v 7.7(2.1) ml.beat-1, p less than 0.05. With propranolol, oxygen pulse was increased to 8.2(1.9) ml.beat-1 at anaerobic threshold and 9.2(2.3) ml.beat-1 at peak exercise (control v propranolol, both p less than 0.01). With verapamil, oxygen pulse was increased to 8.7(1.8) ml.beat-1 at anaerobic threshold and 10.0(2.1) ml.beat-1 at peak exercise (control v verapamil, both p less than 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Digoxin was effective in reducing heart rate at rest, but failed to reduce it during exercise. Propranolol and verapamil reduced heart rate at all levels of exercise as well as at rest. Oxygen uptake during exercise (total exercise capacity) was not reduced with propranolol or verapamil; this was thought to have been accomplished by an increased oxygen pulse.

Aged↗

ST 567 compared with propranolol in stable angina.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of ST 567 in patients suffering from ischaemic heart disease and to compare the effects of this drug with those of propranolol. The study group consisted of 48 male patients, mean age 53, with stable, exercise-induced angina pectoris. After a two-week run-in-placebo period, the patients were randomized to treatment with ST 567 3 X 30 mg (N = 24) and propranolol, 3 X 40 mg (N = 24). The drugs were administered in a double blind fashion during four weeks. Heart rate at rest was decreased by ST 567 from 76 to 65 (P less than 0.005) by propranolol from 76 to 62 (P less than 0.001). Systolic blood pressure was lowered by ST 567 from 131 to 121 (NS) and by propranolol from 133 to 118 (P less than 0.05). Exercise tolerance was increased by ST 567 from 20 X 10(3) to 34 X 10(3) J (P less than 0.05), by propranolol from 26 X 10(3) to 32 X 10(3) J (P less than 0.01) (mean values). Anginal attacks (no. per week) were reduced by ST 567 from 14 to 7 (P less than 0.05) and by propranolol from 14 to 5 (P less than 0.01). Nitroglycerin consumption in no. of tablets per week decreased in ST 567 from 12 to 7 (P less than 0.01), in propranolol from 11 to 4 (P less than 0.0). There were 7 drop outs during treatment with ST 567:2 cases of myocardial infarction, exacerbation of angina in 2 patients, visual disturbances in 2 patients, vertigo in 1 patient. With propranolol we observed worsening of angina in 1 patient, with disturbances in sexual potency in 1. IN CONCLUSION: ST 567 is an effective agent in chronic angina but slightly less effective than propranolol in the dosages studied.

Angina Pectoris↗

Regio- and stereoselectivity in propranolol metabolism by dog liver microsomes and the expressed dog CYP2D15.

We have studied the regio- and stereoselectivity of ring-hydroxylation and N-desisopropylation of S(-)- and R(+)-propranolol, using dog liver microsomes and the expressed dog CYP2D15 in insect cells. In dog liver microsomes, 4-hydroxylation was the preferred pathway in S(-)-propranolol oxidation, while N-desisopropylation was the preferred pathway in R(+)-propranolol oxidation. S(-)-Propranolol was preferred over R(+)-propranolol as substrate for 4- and 5-hydroxylations, while R(+)-propranolol was the preferred substrate for N-desisopropylation at higher substrate concentrations. The expressed CYP2D15 had high catalytic activities toward 4-, 5-hydroxylation, as well as N-desisopropylation of both enantiomers. At the substrate concentrations used, 4-hydroxylation was the preferred pathway for the metabolism of both enantiomers, and S(-)-propranolol was the preferred substrate over R(+)-propranolol for all three monooxygenations catalyzed by CYP2D15. Anti-CYP2D15 peptide antibody strongly inhibited 4- and 5-hydroxylation of both enantiomers in dog liver microsomes, while it did not inhibit their N-desisopropylation. These findings suggest that CYP2D15 is highly responsible for the stereoselective 4- and 5-hydroxylations of propranolol in dog liver microsomes.

Animals↗

Pulmonary reactivity to methacholine during beta-adrenergic blockade: propranolol versus esmolol.

Pulmonary reactivity to methacholine after equipotent beta-blocking doses of propranolol and esmolol was compared in seven basenji-greyhound dogs during thiopental-fentanyl anesthesia. Equipotent doses of esmolol and propranolol were determined by both heart rate effects and by isoproterenol response curves. Propranolol (2 mg/kg) was administered intravenously as a bolus dose and esmolol (0.4-0.5 mg.kg-1.min-1) was administered by continuous infusion. Both esmolol and propranolol significantly decreased heart rate and mean arterial pressure (P less than 0.001). Baseline pulmonary resistance and dynamic compliance did not change after the administration of either propranolol or esmolol. However, propranolol significantly shifted the methacholine dose-response curve to the left so that methacholine (0.3 mg/ml) increased pulmonary resistance by 7.9 +/- 0.97 cmH2O.l-1.s-1 (mean +/- SEM of seven dogs) after pretreatment with propranolol but only 4.4 +/- 0.89 cmH2O.l-1.s-1 (P less than 0.05) without propranolol pretreatment (control). Esmolol, however, did not significantly shift the methacholine dose-response curve. Methacholine (0.3 mg/ml) increased resistance 4.0 +/- 0.89 cmH2O.l-1.s-1 during esmolol administration. This study shows that at equipotent beta 1-blocking doses, propranolol, but not esmolol, produces significant increases in pulmonary reactivity to methacholine.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Stereoselective ring oxidation of propranolol in man.

The objective of this study was to elucidate stereoselective mechanisms of propranolol metabolism in man. Five normal subjects were given single 80 mg oral doses of deuterium-labeled pseudoracemates of propranolol, and the stereochemical composition of propranolol and its major metabolites in urine was determined by GC/MS. The (-)/(+)-enantiomer ratios for unchanged propranolol, 1.50 +/- 0.10 (mean +/- s.e. mean), and propranolol glucuronide, 1.76 +/- 0.10, were similar to previous findings in plasma. All products of side-chain oxidation also consisted mainly of the (-)-enantiomer, with an overall (-)/(+) ratio of 1.61 +/- 0.11. A (-)/(+) ratio of 1.04 +/- 0.17 for 4-hydroxypropranolol did not indicate stereoselectivity in ring oxidation. However, the ratio for its glucuronic acid conjugate of 1.78 +/- 0.19 and for its sulphate conjugate of 0.27 +/- 0.03 suggested stereoselectivity in either the glucuronidation or sulphation of 4-hydroxypropranolol, or both. When the stereoselectivity in these secondary pathways was taken into consideration, the overall ring oxidation strongly favoured (+)-propranolol with a (-)/(+)-enantiomer ratio of 0.59 +/- 0.09. The composite observations of the stereochemistry of propranolol metabolism in man are consistent with stereoselective ring oxidation of (+)-propranolol, leading to a greater bioavailability of the pharmacologically more active (-)-propranolol and subsequent preferential side-chain oxidation and glucuronidation of this enantiomer.

Adult↗

Effects of long-acting propranolol on blood pressure and heart rate in hypertensive Chinese.

In a double-blind, balanced and randomised study we used treadmill exercise to assess the effects of long-acting propranolol (LA propranolol) 160 or 320 mg or placebo, given once daily for 4 weeks, on heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) in 15 Chinese subjects with mild primary hypertension (PHT). We used 24 h ECG monitoring to assess drug effects on HR. Another 18 patients were similarly assessed without exercise. Steady-state plasma propranolol concentrations after LA propranolol 160 and 320 mg were comparable to those after ordinary propranolol 80 and 160 mg daily measured in 11 and 12 separate patients. LA propranolol 160 and 320 mg reduced HR and BP before and during vigorous exercise. LA propranolol 160 and 320 mg reduced HR for 17.6 and 21.4 h of the day, and 320 mg significantly reduced the mean 24 h HR, and the mean maximum HR. The drug effects on BP and HR, and the average plasma propranolol levels after LA propranolol were similar to those reported in European subjects.

Adult↗

Comparison of the efficacy and acceptability of nicardipine and propranolol, alone and in combination, in mild to moderate hypertension.

1. We evaluated the relative efficacies and tolerability of various low-dose combinations of nicardipine and propranolol in patients with mild-moderate essential hypertension (DBP Phase V of greater than 90-125 mmHg; WHO Grades I and II) in order to select the best one. 2. Sixty patients completed the double-blind, balanced, randomised three-way cross-over protocol, with each phase lasting 4 weeks, and in which twice daily nicardipine 40 mg or propranolol 80 mg was compared with four twice daily combinations of nicardipine (20 or 30 mg) plus propranolol (40 or 80 mg). 3. At 'peak' effect time (i.e., 2 h post-dosing) all four treatment combinations were significantly more effective than propranolol, with effects ranging from 9-23 mmHg (systolic) and 5-15 mmHg (diastolic). Only the two 30 mg nicardipine combinations with propranolol were more effective than nicardipine monotherapy, further reducing BP by 8-13 mmHg (systolic) and 5-7 mmHg (diastolic); there were no significant differences between them. 4. 'Trough' diastolic pressures were not different between treatments and 'trough' BP control was sub-optimal on all treatments. 5. 70% of patients on nicardipine monotherapy, 33% of those on propranolol monotherapy and 30% of patients during the placebo run-in complained of symptoms. In terms of complaint rates, there was little to choose between the four combinations (27-33%). Serum potassium and creatinine levels were elevated following propranolol monotherapy by 0.19 mmol 1-1 and 6.5 mumol 1-1 respectively (P less than 0.01 for both) and following the nicardipine 30 mg/propranolol 80 mg combination. Nicardipine monotherapy elevated serum T4 levels by an average of 0.57 ng dl-1 (P less than 0.05). 6. The twice daily combination of nicardipine 30 mg plus propranolol 40 mg was therefore the optimum one in terms of its efficacy and tolerability. Further studies need to be performed to test the hypothesis that a higher dose of propranolol might ameliorate troublesome vasodilator side effects. However, none of the treatments studied was ideal for clinical use in the twice daily dosage used in this study.

Adult↗

Comparison of the actions of acebutolol, practolol and propranolol on calcium transport by heart microsomes and mitochondria.

1 The effects of acebutolol, practolol and propranolol (0,5-3 mM) on calcium uptake, calcium binding and ATPase activities of the rabbit and rat heart microsomal and mitochondrial fractions were investigated. 2 Dose-response and time course experiments revealed that propranolol greatly inhibited microsomal and mitochondrial calcium uptake whereas both acebutolol and practolol showed slight depressant effects. 3 The ATPase activities of microsomal and mitochondrial fractions were decreased by acebutolol, practolol and propranolol; however, the latter agent was more effective than the other two. 4 The inhibitory effects of acebutolol, practolol and propranolol on mitochondria and microsomes were not antagonized by adrenaline. 5 Propranolol decreased calcium binding by the microsomal fraction only, whereas acebutolol and practolol had no effect on microsomal or mitochondrial calcium binding. 6 The sensitivity of the rabbit heart subcellular fractions to the beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs was similar to that of the rat heart; however, the calcium uptake and ATPase activities of microsomes were more sensitive to propranolol than mitochondria in both species. 7 Perfusion of rat hearts with 0.2-1 mM propranolol decreased contractile force, and microsomal and mitochondrial fractions obtained from these hearts accummulated less calcium in comparison to the control. On the other hand, acebutolol and practolol (0.2-1nM) had no appreciable effects on contractile force or subcellular fractions under similar conditions. 8 The negative inotropic effect of propranolol may partly be due to its inhibitory actions on calcium transport by subcellular organelles of the myocardium; the depressant action of propranolol on calcium transport is unlikely to be due to its beta-adrenoceptor blocking property.

Acebutolol↗

Portal pressure response to losartan compared with propranolol in patients with cirrhosis.

OBJECTIVES: Losartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, has portal hypotensive effects. This study evaluates the effect of losartan on portal pressure after 14 days and compares it with that of propranolol. METHODS: A total of 39 individuals with cirrhosis were randomized into two groups of 19 and 20 patients each and were treated with losartan and propranolol, respectively. Hepatic venous pressure gradient was measured at baseline and on day 14 of therapy. Responders to therapy had hepatic venous pressure gradient reduction of >/=20% of baseline value. RESULTS: With losartan, 15 of 19 (78.94%) patients were responders and with propranolol, nine of 20 (45%) patients were responders (p < 0.05). Although the hepatic venous pressure gradient reduction (i.e., percentage from baseline) with losartan (26.74 +/- 21.7%) was higher than with propranolol (14.52 +/- 32%), the difference was not significant. The reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient with losartan was contributed mainly by a significant drop of wedge hepatic venous pressure from 32.42 +/- 6.61 mm of Hg to 28.31 +/- 5.09 mm of Hg (p < 0.05) compared to that with propranolol, which was from 34.55 +/- 5.41 mm of Hg to 32.75 +/- 8.13 mm of Hg (p > 0.05). Responders among alcohol-abusing patients were significantly higher with losartan (81.8%) compared to those on propranolol (27.2%; p < 0.05). In the losartan group, all seven nonascitic cirrhotic individuals, as compared with two of five in the propranolol group, responded to the drugs. During the study, no significant side effects were observed in either group (who were not receiving diuretics) or in follow-up with diuretics. CONCLUSIONS: Losartan is as effective as propranolol in reducing portal pressure in cirrhotic patients who are not receiving diuretics. Losartan is also superior to propranolol for achieving target level hepatic venous gradient for prevention of variceal bleeding in nonascitic and alcohol-abusing cirrhotic patients.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Endoscopic variceal ligation plus propranolol versus endoscopic variceal ligation alone in primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The role of propranolol in addition to EVL in the prevention of first variceal bleed has not been evaluated. This prospective randomized controlled trial compared endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) with propranolol and EVL alone in the prevention of first variceal bleed among patients with high-risk varices. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty-four consecutive patients with high-risk varices were randomly allocated to EVL plus propranolol (Gr I, n = 72) or EVL alone (Gr II, n = 72). EVL was done at 2-wk interval till obliteration of varices. In Gr I, incremental dosage of propranolol (sufficient to reduce heart rate to 55 beats/min or 25% reduction from baseline) was administered and continued after obliteration of varices. The endpoints of the study were bleeding and death. RESULTS: The two groups of patients had comparable baseline characteristics; follow-up (Gr I: 13.1 +/- 11.5 months, Gr II: 11.2 +/- 9.9 months), number of cirrhotic and noncirrhotic portal hypertension patients [Gr I 64 (88.6%) and 8 (11.4%), Gr II 63 (87.5%) and 9 (12.5%)], and frequency of Child's A (15 vs 18), B (38 vs 35), and C (19 vs 19). The mean daily propranolol dose achieved in Gr I was 95.6 +/- 38.6 mg. Eleven patients had bleeds, 5 in Gr I and 6 in Gr II. All patients bled before the obliteration of varices, the actuarial probability of first bleed at 20 months was 7% in Gr I and 11% in Gr II (p= 0.72). Six patients died in the combination and 8 in EVL group. All deaths in Gr I were due to nonbleed-related causes, while in Gr II, 2 deaths were bleed related, the actuarial probability of death at 20 months was 8% and 15%, respectively (p= 0.37). The probability of bleed-related death was comparable (p= 0.15). At the end of follow-up, 4 patients in Gr I and 11 in Gr II had recurrence of varices (p= 0.03). Side effects on propranolol were seen in 22% patients, in 8% it had to be stopped. There were no serious complications of EVL. CONCLUSIONS: Both EVL plus propranolol and EVL alone are effective in primary prophylaxis of bleed from high-risk varices. Addition of propranolol does not decrease the probability of first bleed or death in patients on EVL. However, the recurrence of varices is lower if propranolol is added to EVL.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Effect of oral propranolol on the anerobic threshold and maximum exercise performance in normal man.

The effect of propranolol on the anaerobic threshold was studied in six healthy male volunteers. The subjects exercised on a cycle ergometer in a progressive exercise test to exhaustion with propranolol or no drug. Power output was increased by 30 W ever 2 min. Propranolol caused a significant reduction of heart rate by 20-45 beats per minute at all power outputs. In light and moderate exercise, no differences in oxygen uptake, ventilation, or blood lactate were observed in the propranolol and no-drug tests. The anaerobic threshold was not different between the no-drug (2.32 +/- 0.19 L O2/min, mean +/J- SD) and the propranolol (2.83 +/- 0.27 L O2/min) test; however, the heart rate at the anaerobic threshold was significantly lower in the propranolol (143 +/- 13 beats per minute) than the no-drug (187 +/- 9 beats per minute) tests. Above the anaerobic threshold, oxygen uptake was similar at a given power output but it reached a lower peak value (p less than 0.02) in the propranolol (3.16 +/- 0.16 L O2/min) versus the no-drug (3.64 +/- 0.39 L O2/min) tests. It was concluded that propranolol caused no change in anaerobic threshold in this specific progressive exercise protocol. The results suggest that a training intensity for endurance exercise bases on the anaerobic threshold does not need to be modified for subjects on propranolol medication.

Adult↗

Uptake of propranolol by the lung and its displacement by other drugs: involvement of the alveolar macrophage.

The role of the alveolar macrophage in the uptake of 3H-propranolol by the isolated perfused rabbit lung and displacement of 3H-propranolol from this site has been investigated. Removal of 3H-propranolol (100 microgram) by the lung was characterized by a rapid distribution phase (t1/2 min) and a slower elimination phase with a clearance of 22.4 ml/min (t1/2 = 47 min). Addition of chlorpromazine (1 mg) at 30 min was followed by a twofold increase in perfusate concentrations of 3H-propranolol which was also associated with a reduction of 3H-propranolol in macrophages recovered from lungs at the end of perfusion experiments. Experiments using isolated alveolar macrophages demonstrated uptake of propranolol and marked inhibition by 100-fold higher concentrations of chlorpromazine and imipramine. In the intact dog, injection of imipramine (1 mg/kg) 60-70 min after bolus injection of 3H-propranolol (0.3 mg/kg) was associated with an immediate increase in blood levels of 3H-propranolol consistent with tissue redistribution. It is concluded that chlorpromazine and imipramine can displace propranolol from the lung,and that the alveolar macrophage is involved in this process.

Animals↗

Fish oil amplifies the effect of propranolol in mild essential hypertension.

Forty-seven male patients with mild essential hypertension were randomly allocated to three subgroups. After a run-in period of 4 weeks, the first subgroup (n = 16) received propranolol (80 mg/day) for 36 weeks followed by a placebo period of 4 weeks. The second subgroup (n = 15), after a run-in period of 4 weeks, was given a supplement of encapsulated fish oil (9 g/day) for 36 weeks with a subsequent period of 4 weeks in which fish oil placebo was given. The third subgroup (n = 16), after a run-in period of 4 weeks, was given propranolol (80 mg/day) for 12 weeks, propranolol (80 mg/day) plus fish oil capsules (9 g/day equivalent to 1.8 g/day of eicosapentaenoic acid and 1.1 g/day of docosahexaenoic acid) for 12 weeks, propranolol plus fish oil placebo (same doses for 12 weeks) with a subsequent period of 4 weeks when propranolol placebo was administered. The results indicate a blood pressure-lowering effect of fish oil, which was comparable with that of propranolol. The simultaneous intake of fish oil plus propranolol was more effective than propranolol or fish oil alone. Propranolol treatment resulted in a decrease of plasma norepinephrine, plasma renin activity, and thromboxane B2 formation. After fish oil supplementation, plasma norepinephrine and thromboxane B2 formation were likewise reduced, whereas plasma renin activity appeared increased. The decrease of serum triglycerides, total and low density lipoprotein cholesterol as well as the rise of high density lipoprotein cholesterol are concomitant beneficial effects, which justify the consideration of fish oil alone or in combination with antihypertensive drugs for the treatment of mild hypertension.

Adult↗

Elevation of beta-adrenergic receptor density in human lymphocytes after propranolol administration.

Abrupt withdrawal after the chronic administration of propranolol has resulted in clinical syndromes that suggest adrenergic hypersensitivity. The effect of propranolol administration and withdrawal on beta-adrenergic receptors was studied in human lymphocyte membranes. Receptor density was quantitated by direct binding assays with the radioligand [125I]iodohydroxybenzylpindolol. Administration of propranolol (160 mg/d) for 8 d resulted in trough plasma levels of approximately 35 ng/ml. By day 5 of propranolol administration the density of beta-adrenergic receptors had increased 43 +/- 4% (P less than 0.01) above pretreatment levels. Abrupt withdrawal of propranolol was followed by the disappearance of propranolol from the plasma within 24 h. The density of beta-adrenergic receptors did not return to pretreatment level for several days. Physiologic supersensitivity of beta-adrenergic receptor-mediated responses was suggested by the appearance of significant increases in the orthostatic change in heart rate (P less than 0.05) and the orthostatic change in the heart rate-systolic blood pressure product (P less than 0.01) during the first 48 h after propranolol withdrawal. These data show that propranolol administration leads to an increase in the density of beta-adrenergic receptors in human tissue. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that some of the untoward effects observed after abrupt discontinuation of propranolol are caused by beta-receptor-mediated adrenergic hypersensitivity.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗