Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Programs”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19Linked to original sources
PubMed1994

Medicaid program; drug use review program and electronic claims management system for outpatient drug claims--HCFA. Final rule.

This final rule revises some of the regulatory requirements for the drug use review (DUR) program for covered outpatient drugs furnished to recipients under the Medicaid program. The regulatory requirements became effective on January 2, 1993, as a result of an interim final rule with comment period that we published on November 2, 1992. Specifically, these revisions-- Clarify the definitions of overutilization, underutilization, consensus process, peer-reviewed literature, adverse medical result, adverse drug-drug interaction, appropriate and medically necessary, and individual medical history; Change the requirements for licensure of DUR board members, and telephone counseling arrangements for mail order pharmacies; Include non-prescription drugs in the consideration of alteration of therapeutic effect; Require hospitals to give assurances that they have met the requirements of the statute before claiming the hospital exemption from DUR; Specify the issues that State agencies must address when formulating counseling standards; Clarify the bases for DUR board recommendations; Clarify the distinction between DUR and surveillance and utilization review (SUR); and Make certain technical and editorial corrections. The November 1992 interim final rule with comment period incorporated and interpreted certain provisions of section 4401 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.↗
PubMed1998

Medicare and Medicaid programs; recognition of the American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities, Inc. for Ambulatory Surgical Centers Program--HCFA. Proposed notice.

In this notice we announce the receipt of an application from the American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities, Inc. (AAAASF) for recognition as a national accreditation program for ambulatory surgical centers that wish to participate in the Medicare or Medicaid programs. The Social Security Act requires that the Secretary publish a notice identifying the national accreditation body making the request, describing the nature of the request, and providing a 30 day public comment period.

Accreditation↗
PubMed1998

Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services (CHAMPUS); TRICARE Program; reimbursement--DoD. Final rule.

This final rule revises certain requirements and procedures for reimbursement under the CHAMPUS program, the purpose of which is to implement a comprehensive managed health care delivery system composed of military medical treatment facilities and CHAMPUS. Issues addressed in this rule include: implementation of changes made to the Medicare Prospective Payment System (PPS) upon which the CHAMPUS DRG-based payment system is modeled and required by law to follow wherever practicable, along with changes to make our DRG-based payment system operate better; clarification of payment reduction for noncompliance with required utilization of publication of list of ambulatory surgery procedures; limitation on ambulatory surgery group payment rates; extension of the balance billing limitations currently in place for individual and professional providers to non-institutional, non-professional providers; adjustment of the CHAMPUS maximum allowable charge (CMAC) rate in the small number of cases where the CMAC rate is less than the Medicare rate; implementation of the government-wide debarment rule where any provider excluded or suspended from CHAMPUS shall be excluded from all other programs and activities involving Federal financial assistance, such as Medicare or Medicaid; elimination of the requirement for non-participating providers to file claims; and revision of the ambulatory surgery cost-share information to enable the cost-share to be assessed against the facility claim instead of the primary surgeon's claim.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.↗
PubMed1983

Medicaid program; early and periodic screening, diagnosis, and treatment (EPSDT) program--HCFA. Proposed rule.

This proposal would modify present regulations to conform to recent legislative changes enacted by section 2181 of Pub. L. 97-35, the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981. That section eliminates the penalty which reduces by one percent Federal funds for a States's Title IV-A program, Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), for any quarter during which a State fails to: (1) inform all AFDC families of the availability of early and periodic screening, diagnosis, and treatment EPSDT services; (2) provide or arrange for requested screening services; and (3) arrange for corrective treatment of health problems found. In addition, section 2181 mandates that States incorporate these three requirements into their State Medicaid plan with respect to all EPSDT eligibles. Further, this proposed rule would modify current Medicaid EPSDT regulations to reflect Congressional intent that States should continue to develop fully effective EPSDT programs; however, current requirements which entail a large volume of paperwork should be significantly streamlined.

Aid to Families with Dependent Children↗
PubMed1988

Using a systems approach to evaluate the effectiveness of health service programs: the Health Care Facility Accreditation Program as an example.

This paper examines the value of developing a "systems" perspective of organisational/suborganisational characteristics as an aid to evaluating the effectiveness of programs within the health services context. An example of applying the theory to a specific health service program is given. The commonly used approach to evaluation--the goal attainment model--is examined in detail. It is contrasted with other approaches including systems theory. The conclusion is reached that the systems approach is more suitable as a means of structuring evaluation within the health care field.

Accreditation↗
PubMed1983

Medicare program; end-stage renal disease program; prospective reimbursement for dialysis services and approval of special purpose renal dialysis facilities--HCFA. Final rule.

These regulations change the reimbursement system by which Medicare pays for outpatient maintenance dialysis and related physician and laboratory services. These changes establish a prospective method of payment for maintenance dialysis, whether furnished at home or in a hospital-based or independent dialysis facility, and revise other aspects of the reimbursement system to encourage home dialysis and provide incentives for economy and efficiency in furnishing these services. These amendments implement section 2145 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981. We expect that these changes will improve our administration of the end-stage renal disease program and enable us to control the rapidly growing costs of furnishing dialysis. The controls on quality of care that have been in effect since the beginning of the program will continue to apply. These regulations will also ensure access to care by providing for adequate reimbursement to isolated, essential facilities, where patients have no alternative sources of dialysis care. These regulations also provide for time-limited approval for Medicare participation of special purpose renal dialysis facilities. As a general rule we have not approved facilities such as transient or mobile units set up for emergency purposes or to serve vacationing dialysis patients in State parks and children's camps. This change in regulations will remove this limitation.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.↗
PubMed1986

Medicare program; End Stage Renal Disease Program; redesignation of networks and reorganization of network organizations--HCFA. Final rule.

This final rule revises the requirements in current regulations pertaining to the End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) networks and organizations and establishes provisions for new, more efficient network organizations. This rule removes the criteria that define existing networks, removes the requirement that HCFA change designations of ESRD networks through rulemaking, and removes the list of currently-designated networks that now appears in regulations. It is intended that these amendments will increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the ESRD program by instituting a faster process for changing network designations and organizations as program needs arise. These amendments also permit the reduction of the number of existing networks to as few as 14, which is consistent with section 9214 of Pub. L. 99-272, the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA).

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.↗
PubMed1999

Medicare program; recognition of the Community Health Accreditation Program, Inc. (CHAP) for hospices. Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), HHS. Final notice.

This notice recognizes the Community Health Accreditation Program, Inc. (CHAP) as a national accreditation organization for hospices that request participation in the Medicare program. We believe that accreditation of hospices by CHAP demonstrates that all Medicare hospice conditions of participation are met or exceeded. Thus, we grant deemed status to those hospices accredited by CHAP. The proposed notice included the application from the Joint Commission for Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO). We have separated the final notices to appropriately process each application and will issue a separate final notice containing the decision for JCAHO under HCFA-2039-FN.

Accreditation↗
PubMed2000

The Clinical Laboratory Improvement Program: not your ordinary regulatory program.

The Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA'88) established national standards of laboratory practice and test performance in the areas of registration and certification, inspection, proficiency testing, personnel qualifications, quality control, patient test management, and quality assurance. A memorandum of agreement between the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Defense (DOD) established the DOD Clinical Laboratory Improvement Program (CLIP) and authorized the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs to develop CLIA'88-comparable regulations governing DOD laboratories. In implementing the DOD program, the CLIA'88 regulations were adopted to the maximum extent possible and modified only as required to meet those unique DOD missions that precluded compliance. This article provides an abbreviated historical background on CLIA'88/CLIP, defines the testing categories identified under the CLIP regulations, and briefly describes the process for application and requirements for compliance.

Accreditation↗
PubMed2000

Medicare program; Medicare+Choice program. Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), HHS. Final rule with comment period.

This final rule with comment period responds to comments on the June 26, 1998 interim final rule that implemented the Medicare+Choice (M+C) program and makes revisions to those regulations where warranted. We also are making revisions to the regulations that are necessary to reflect the changes to the M+C program resulting from the Balanced Budget Refinement Act of 1999 (BBRA). Revisions to the regulations reflecting changes in the law made by the BBRA are subject to public comment. Issues discussed in this rule include eligibility, election, and enrollment policies; marketing requirements; access requirements; service area and benefit policy; quality improvement standards; payment rates, risk adjustment methodology, and encounter data submission; provider participation rules; beneficiary appeals and grievances; contractual requirements; and preemption of State law by Federal law. This final rule also addresses comments on the interim final rule published on December 2, 1997, which implemented user fees for section 1876 risk contractors for 1998, and formed the basis for the M+C user fee provisions in the June 26, 1998 interim final rule, and the provider-sponsored organization (PSO) interim final rule published April 14, 1998.

Budgets↗
PubMed1992

[A pathogenic manpower program: the program for foreign domestics].

Every year, a special federal program arranges for the arrival of about 12,000 educated women to Canada to work several years in private homes as housekeepers. However, in order to meet the needs of the employer and the Canadian economy, these women are denied their fundamental freedoms and are deliberately kept in a precarious situation material and psychologically and with respect to their status. Because it exposes these female workers to such factors of instability and to the negative effects of key experiences, this program carries the seed of mental illness.

Canada↗
PubMed1992

Prepayment with office-based physicians in publicly funded programs: results from the Children's Medicaid Program.

This paper is a report of the results of a demonstration designed to provide empirical evidence regarding the effects of alternative approaches to paying physicians for serving children in the Medicaid program: (1) visit fees set at twice regular Medicaid fees in return for physician agreement to manage utilization and (2) capitation and financial risk-sharing along with the same physician agreement to manage utilization. Participating physicians were assigned randomly to either of the two payment groups. Comparisons of utilization and expenditures were made between these two plans and the regular Medicaid program (fee-for-service, low fees). Results showed no adverse effect of capitation payments on primary care visits to office-based physicians. Capitation physician referrals to specialists decreased relative to all other groups studied, consistent with the theory that the financial incentives in capitation will lead primary care physicians to reduce referrals to specialists.

Child↗
PubMed1989

[Results of a multiphase oncology population screening program in the community of Becej 1986-1987. I. The Hemoccult Program].

In the framework of a multiphase oncologic population screening-program performed in persons above 40 years of age according to the census in the community of Becej during 1986-1987, Hemoccult screening program, together with the fluorographic action involved 16.895 (83.80%) persons out of 20.160 predicted ones which was far less than the involvement of persons through the distribution and gathering of the screening material by a specialized nurse. In 907 (5.37%) Hemoccult positive persons out of which 121 (13.34%) persons rejected to cooperate or did not respond to the invitation for further investigation 16 malignant neoplasms in the lower part of the colon (anus 1, rectum 11, sigma 4) were detected as well as 53 polyposes of the rectum and the anus. Besides, 4 malignant neoplasms of the skin were found and 29 benign tumours (27 adenomas of the prostate gland, 1 fibrolipoma glutei and 1 cysta renis). Apart from these diseases 569 other previously not treated pathologic states were found, i.e. new pathologic states were detected in 85.37% of Hemoccult-positive persons. Previously known pathologic states were confirmed in 22.52% of Hemoccult-positive persons. Diagnostic was performed by the rigid rectoscope and in Hemoccult-positive persons with the negative rectoscopis finding radiologic and fiberoscopic investigations were carried out in the less scope due to the deficiency of financial resources. The number of detected malignant neoplasms of the colon surpassed the three-fold value of the average Vojvodina incidence of these localizations of malignant neoplasms at this age.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1986

An evaluation of a program to regulate rural hospital costs: the Finger Lakes Hospital Experimental Payment program.

In 1981 eight small- and medium-sized hospitals in a rural area of New York State began voluntary participation in the Finger Lakes Hospital Experimental Payment (FLHEP) program. An annual maximum reimbursement formula was set for each hospital, which offered financial incentives to contain the growth in expenditures without penalty in subsequent years. In this analysis of the first three years of the program, we found that the growth in revenues and expenses in study group hospitals was reduced and chronic deficits were eliminated. The FLHEP model may have wider potential for ensuring solvency while controlling expenditures of hospitals in other rural areas of the United States.

Cost Control↗
PubMed1988

Persistence of reduction in blood pressure and mortality of participants in the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program. Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Group.

The Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program (HDFP) previously described a significant reduction in five-year, all-cause mortality in its intensively treated stepped care (SC) group relative to its referred care (RC) control group. At the time this finding was described, a proportion of the SC cohort had been treated for periods as long as 6.7 years, but comparable RC and SC mortality data beyond five years were not available. These data, which are described herein, indicate that the 6.7-year life-table mortality rates were 95.1/1000 participants for SC vs 116.3/1000 participants for RC, a larger mortality difference than was observed at five years. This favorable finding for SC extended to all major subgroups, including white women and those aged 30 to 49 years at trial entry. Six months after the close of the treatment trial, a two-year posttrial surveillance study, which extended mortality follow-up to 8.3 years, was conducted. The posttrial use of antihypertensive medication declined in SC and increased in RC participants so that by the end of the posttrial period, there was little difference in the percentages of SC and RC participants taking medication. Control of blood pressure, indicated by mean diastolic blood pressure and by percent of participants with a pressure of 90 mm Hg or less, was slightly better for SC than for RC participants (SC group, 86.5 mm Hg and 68% controlled; RC group, 87.8 mm Hg and 62% controlled). The absolute mortality advantage found at 6.7 years persisted and increased throughout the posttrial period of follow-up despite discontinuation of the formal SC therapy program. It is postulated that regression of hypertensive end-organ changes brought about by the more effective SC treatment caused this favorable outcome.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Educational level and 5-year all-cause mortality in the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program. Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Group.

Excess mortality in persons of lower socioeconomic status is a finding confirmed in many population studies. Among the nearly 11,000 hypertensive trial participants in the population-based Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program, lower educational level (an indicator of low socioeconomic status) was associated with a 5-year death rate significantly above that found in those with higher education. This report examines whether this excess was observed uniformly within both treatment groups--stepped care and referred care--or whether the more vigorous antihypertensive program of stepped care was able to reduce the mortality gradient associated with education. In addition, impact on mortality of degree of blood pressure control during the trial was assessed within stepped and referred care groups, taking account also of educational level. Finally, the benefit of stepped care compared with referred care (control group) in reducing mortality was analyzed, controlling for education. Referred care participants with less than a high school education had a 5-year death rate twice as high as those with more than a high school education, whereas no such gradient of mortality was seen in the stepped care group. Level of blood pressure control throughout the trial was better in the stepped than in the referred care group and was significantly (inversely) associated with mortality in the stepped care group, regardless of educational level. In the referred care group as well, the better the control of elevated blood pressure (again, regardless of educational level), the lower the mortality, although this inverse association did not quite reach statistical significance in the referred care group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Educational Status↗