Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Premedication”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19Linked to original sources
PubMed1986

Buccal morphine premedication. A double-blind comparison with intramuscular morphine.

Fifty patients were admitted to a double-blind, double-dummy study comparing buccal morphine 10 mg tablets and intramuscular morphine sulphate 13.5 mg as premedication. This investigation was performed on the basis of favourable results obtained in an earlier 25 patient pilot study designed to examine the efficacy, safety and patient acceptability of buccal morphine 10 mg tablets as pre-anaesthetic medication. Both studies and sets of results are presented and show that, whilst buccal morphine is a safe alternative means of delivering opioid premedication, which is acceptable to the majority of patients, an equivalent intramuscular morphine dose is nevertheless a more effective premedicant in terms of anxiolysis and wakefulness, as assessed by linear analogue scores. Pharmacokinetic considerations are advanced both to explain the differing clinical efficacies of the two means of morphine administration and to indicate that improved per- and immediate postoperative analgesia might be obtainable in patients premedicated with buccal morphine.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1995

The effect of midazolam premedication on implicit memory activation during alfentanil-nitrous oxide anaesthesia.

Eighty-three patients were given midazolam 0.1 mg.kg-1 by intramuscular injection as premedication before general anaesthesia with alfentanil-nitrous oxide. During anaesthesia patients were presented (through headphones) with either statements about common facts of some years ago (group A) (n = 43) or new verbal associations, e.g. names of fictitious, nonfamous people (group B) (n = 40). In a previous study with the same anaesthetic technique, but without premedication there was significant activation of implicit memory (p < 0.001). In this study we found no explicit or implicit memory for the auditory information presented during anaesthesia. Midazolam premedication can prevent implicit memory activation during alfentanil-nitrous oxide anaesthesia.

Adult↗
PubMed1980

Failure of intramuscularly administered lorazepam and scopolamine-morphine premedication to produce amnesic effects to supplement conduction anaesthesia.

Patients undergoing surgery under regional anaesthesia often prefer to be sedated and do not later want to recall the procedure. One hundred and twenty-one patients scheduled for various surgical procedures under epidural, spinal, sacral, or brachial plexus blockades received 1 mg/kg of pethidine, 0.007 mg/kg of scopolamine, plus 0.14 mg/kg of morphine, or 0.03 mg/kg or 0.06 mg/kg or lorazepam intramuscularly as preanaesthetic medication before the operation. The patients's self-assessments of degree of fatigue and apprehension were similar after each premedication when assessed before operation. Postoperative anxiety and confusion as well as need for postoperative care and supervision were greatest after 0.06mg/kg of lorazepam. Significantly (P smaller than 0.05 to P smaller than 0.01) fewer patients given 0.06 mg/kg or lorazepam remembered different events and procedures carried out on them before and after operation than those given other premedications, but no significant differences were noted in patients' ability to recall the performance of operation when asked on the following day. Seventy-seven, 63, and 57% of patients receiving 0.06 mg/kg of lorazepam remembered the start of blockade, performance of operation, and stay in recovery room, respectively. Intravenous sedation should be preferred to these intramuscularly administered premedications if drug-induced amnesia is sought to supplement local anaesthetic techniques.

Adult↗
PubMed1982

Does oral premedication increase the risk of gastric aspiration? A study to compare the effect of diazepam given orally and intramuscularly on the volume and acidity of gastric aspirate.

In a clinical study including 40 patients, who all underwent elective gynaecological surgery, the quantity and acidity of the gastric contents were compared for patients premedicated with diazepam (Apozepam) intramuscularly and orally, respectively. A significant difference was found with regard to both the quantity and acidity of the gastric fluid. The volume of gastric fluid was smaller after oral than after intramuscular premedication with diazepam (1.5 ml and 20 ml, respectively). The acidity of the gastric fluid was also less after oral than after intramuscular premedication (pH 2.4 and 1.8, respectively).

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1985

Sublingual flunitrazepam for premedication.

The clinical effects of a standard 2 mg flunitrazepam tablet given sublingually for premedication were evaluated in a group of 50 patients undergoing otorhinolaryngologic surgery. A comparable group of 49 patients received 10 mg of diazepam orally. The degree of sedation and anxiety was assessed objectively and subjectively before induction of anaesthesia. Flunitrazepam produced better sedation judged by the observer as well as by the patients. There was less anxiety in the flunitrazepam group but this was not statistically significant. Side effects were few and patient acceptability high. Sublingual premedication using flunitrazepam could be a useful alternative to other forms of premedication.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1985

Respiratory effects of premedication during enflurane N2O anaesthesia in children.

The influence of premedication on induction characteristics and respiration was studied in 40 children breathing spontaneously during enflurane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia. Two different premedications were used. Twenty children (Group DA) received a rectal solution containing diazepam 0.25 mg kg-1 and atropine 0.015 mg kg-1 and 20 (Group DMS) received a rectal solution of diazepam 0.5 mg kg-1, morphine 0.15 mg kg-1 and scopolamine 0.01 mg kg-1. The children in Group DMS had a significantly higher preoperative sedative score (P less than 0.01), faster induction of anaesthesia (P less than 0.01), lower occurrence of airway problems during induction and a smoother intubation (P less than 0.05) than the children in Group DA. However, the end-tidal carbon dioxide tensions were higher and the occurrence of apnoea was more common in Group DMS than in Group DA. Thus it was concluded that if the more sedative premedication (DMS) is to be used for enflurane anaesthesia in children, controlled ventilation would be preferable.

Anesthesia, Inhalation↗
PubMed1987

Halothane, enflurane and isoflurane anaesthesia for adenoidectomy in children, using two different premedications.

In 48 children subjected to adenoidectomy, comparisons of airway problems, heart rates, cardiac arrhythmias, ventilation and stress hormone reactions were studied during halothane, enflurane and isoflurane anaesthesia. Sixteen children were anaesthetized with either of the three agents and eight patients in each group received diazepam 0.25 mg kg-1 and atropine 0.015 mg kg-1 rectally (DA) as premedication and the remainder diazepam 0.5 mg kg-1, morphine 0.15 mg kg-1 and scopolamine 0.01 mg kg-1 (DMS) rectally. All children were intubated and breathing spontaneously. Equianaesthetic inspired concentrations of halothane, enflurane and isoflurane were used. Airway problems were of the same magnitude during halothane and isoflurane anaesthesia but were less frequent with both agents compared with enflurane anaesthesia. DMS reduced the number of airway reactions in all groups. Respiratory rates were uninfluenced by anaesthesia, intubation and surgery during enflurane anaesthesia. Cardiac arrhythmias were less frequent with enflurane and isoflurane than with halothane. Plasma ACTH and cortisol were similar with all three agents. During induction of anaesthesia in the DA-premedicated halothane group, however, plasma catecholamines were higher than in the group which received DMS, in contrast to the findings during enflurane and isoflurane anaesthesia. The DMS premedication decreased the response of plasma ACTH, cortisol and plasma catecholamines to surgery.

Adenoidectomy↗
PubMed1987

Benzodiazepines as oral premedication. A comparison between oxazepam, flunitrazepam and placebo.

Oxazepam 25 mg, flunitrazepam 1 mg and placebo were compared as oral premedication in 602 gynecological patients in a double-blind randomised parallel study. In 251 patients undergoing major surgery the same drug was also given as a hypnotic the night before the operation. Both active drugs shortened the sleep-onset time, decreased the number of spontaneous awakenings at night and improved the quality of sleep when compared to placebo. The active drugs were significantly better than placebo as premedication when assessed by both the patients and the anesthesiologist. In 351 patients admitted for day-case minor surgery with no previous night medication, flunitrazepam was significantly better than placebo as premedication when assessed by both the patients and the anesthesiologist, while oxazepam was only better than placebo when judged by the anesthesiologist, not by the patients.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1990

Anticholinergic premedication in Finland 1988.

In order to investigate the present use of anticholinergic drugs in premedication, a questionnaire was sent to Finnish anaesthesiologists. The results indicate that there is significant variation between different parts of the country regarding the usage of these drugs. A decrease in routine use has taken place over the past 5 years. Half of the anaesthesiologists now routinely use anticholinergic drugs in premedication, while 69% were using them 5 years ago. Glycopyrrolate has gained popularity and was the most used drug. Most anaesthesiologists gave the anticholinergic premedication intravenously, briefly before induction.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1990

Comparison of methohexital and pentobarbital for premedication in children.

Thirty children scheduled for elective orchiopexy or herniotomy were consecutively assigned at random to premedication with methohexital 80 mg/ml, 20 mg/kg rectally, 15 min before transportation to the operating room, or pentobarbital 28 mg/ml, 7 mg/kg rectally, 45 min before transportation. The quality of premedication was recorded at induction with halothane 1-2% and 60% N2O in O2 by mask. All patients received a caudal injection of bupivacaine 1.9 mg/ml, 1.25 ml/kg before surgery. Following completion of anaesthesia, the postoperative wake-up time and the duration of stay in the post-operative recovery room were recorded. The degree and quality of recovery were assessed using the Aldrete score every 30 min until discharge from the recovery room. The group of children receiving methohexital showed a highly significantly shorter awakening time, and a highly significantly shorter stay in the recovery room compared to the pentobarbital group. The children in both groups had a quiet, easy recovery without significant signs of confusion or agitation, and no difference in quality of recovery could be shown. Emergence delirium or agitation in connection with pentobarbital premedication and a possible relation to postoperative pain is discussed.

Anesthesia Recovery Period↗
PubMed1992

Premedication for outpatient cataract surgery: a comparative study of intramuscular alfentanil, midazolam and placebo.

The effects of i.m. alfentanil and midazolam on anxiety, sedation, hemodynamics, oxygen saturation and intraocular pressure were studied in 90 patients scheduled for outpatient cataract surgery with regional anesthesia. The study was randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and performed on outpatients with ASA physical status I-III and mean age 67.7 +/- 11.7 years. Alfentanil (12.5 micrograms/kg) administered into the deltoid muscle had a marked anxiolytic and short sedative effect, and was associated with stable hemodynamics. Midazolam (20 micrograms/kg) administered similarly had a more prolonged anxiolytic and sedative effect, which impaired co-operation in some patients during surgery. The regional blockade was associated with a significant reduction of oxygen saturation (SpO2), regardless of the premedication used (P less than 0.05). A slight reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) was found after premedication, but the change was not statistically significant. We conclude that i.m. alfentanil is well tolerated, and its anxiolytic and short sedative effects make it especially suitable as premedication for day-case cataract surgery.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Premedication with promethazine and transdermal scopolamine reduces the incidence of nausea and vomiting after intrathecal morphine.

Intrathecal morphine provides effective postoperative pain relief in major orthopaedic surgery. In use, however, is associated with unpleasant side effects like nausea and vomiting. The effect of different premedications on postoperative emetic sequelae induced by intrathecal morphine was studied in a prospective, double blind study. Sixty patients scheduled for arthroplasty surgery of the lower extremity were anaesthetized with spinal anaesthesia with a combination of isobaric bupivacaine 20 mg and morphine 0.3 mg. For premedication the patients were randomised to three groups of equal size. They received either oral diazepam (5-15 mg), oral promethazine (10 mg) or a combination of promethazine and transdermal scopolamine (1.5 mg). Sixty percent of the patients with both promethazine and transdermal scopolamine were totally free from postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) symptoms compared to those premedicated with diazepam (40%) or promethazine alone (30%). Promethazine together with transdermal scopolamine reduced significantly the number of patients with vomiting (to 25%) and also vomiting episodes. This combination was also more efficient in reducing the incidence of nausea (to 25%) and nausea episodes than promethazine along (P < 0.05). Combination also reduced the requests for additional pain relief (P < 0.05). PONV occurred in a majority of patients during the first 12 hours of the 24 hour study period and the need for additional analgesics thereafter. The incidence of itching (50-65%) and urinary catheterisation (55-70%) was similar in all groups. In conclusion, the combination of oral promethazine and transdermal scopolamine was most effective in reducing PONV symptoms and also reduced the need for postoperative pain treatment.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed2005

Comparison of a combination of midazolam and diazepam and midazolam alone as oral premedication on preanesthetic and emergence condition in children.

BACKGROUND: Preanesthetic anxiety and emergence agitation are major challenges for anesthesiologists in pediatric anesthesia. Thus, midazolam has been used as premedication for children. However, midazolam alone is not effective for emergence agitation. The present study tested the effect of a combination of midazolam and diazepam on the preanesthetic condition and emergence behavior in children. METHODS: Forty-two children were allocated to one of three groups: the NoPre group received no premedication; the Mi group received midazolam 0.5 mg kg(-1) orally; and the Mi + Di group received midazolam 0.25 mg kg(-1) and diazepam 0.25 mg kg(-1) orally. When anesthesia was induced with 7% sevoflurane in 100% oxygen, qualities of mask induction and sedation were rated. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (3-5%) in 100% oxygen. During emergence from anesthesia, the score of the child's emergence behavior was rated. RESULTS: Children in the Mi and Mi + Di groups were more sedated than those in the NoPre group. A combination of midazolam and diazepam provided a better quality of mask induction, when compared with no premedication. Also, the children in the Mi + Di group were less agitated than those in the other groups during the emergence. CONCLUSION: Children in the Mi + Di group were significantly more sedated at induction of anesthesia and less agitated during emergence from anesthesia.

Adenoidectomy↗
PubMed2005

Evaluation of relatively low dose of oral transmucosal ketamine premedication in children: a comparison with oral midazolam.

BACKGROUND: Oral Transmucosal ketamine (lollipop) has been shown to be an effective, harmless preoperative medication for children. However, its efficacy was not compared with commonly used premedication drugs. We, therefore, compared the efficacy of oral transmucosal ketamine with oral midazolam for premedication in children. METHODS: Fifty-five children (2-6 years of age) were randomized to receive orally either a lollipop containing 50 mg of ketamine (the group K; n = 27) or syrup containing 0.5 mg.kg(-1) of midazolam (the group M; n = 28) before minor surgery. A five points-sedation score (1 = asleep to 5 = agitated; scores 2 and 3 were defined as 'effective') on arrival in the operating room and a three points-acceptance score of separation from the parents and a three points-mask cooperation score at induction of anesthesia (1 = easy to 3 = markedly resistant; score 3 was defined as 'poor') were used. RESULTS: Sedation scores in group K were significantly higher than those in group M (P = 0.012), and the incidence of 'effective' in sedation was significantly lower in group K than in group M (P = 0.036). The incidence of 'poor' at separation from the parents and for mask cooperation was significantly higher in group K than in group M (P = 0.017, P = 0.019, respectively). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that a relatively low dose of oral transmucosal ketamine premedication provides no benefits over oral midazolam in children.

Administration, Buccal↗
PubMed1992

Oral midazolam is an effective premedication for children having day-stay anaesthesia.

The effect of oral premedication was studied in a double-blind, randomised trial of 200 children undergoing day-stay anaesthesia. Midazolam 0.25 mg/kg, midazolam 0.5 mg/kg, diazepam 0.5 mg/kg or a placebo was given orally one hour prior to anaesthesia. Patient state was assessed at nine stages, from administration of the premedication up to and including induction of anaesthesia, using a four-point behavioural scale. Patient state was also assessed postoperatively in the recovery area and the day-stay ward. There was no difference between the four groups until induction of anaesthesia. At this stage 82% of children were either asleep or awake and calm. Patients who received midazolam 0.5 mg/kg were more likely to be asleep or awake and calm at induction rather than other groups (P = 0.05). Children receiving midazolam 0.5 mg/kg or diazepam 0.5 mg/kg slept longest in the post anaesthetic recovery room (P less than 0.005), and spent most time there (P less than .005). There was no difference between groups in the length of time spent in the day-stay ward or in the number of overnight admissions. The study shows that a high proportion of unsedated children are calm at induction of anaesthesia and that oral midazolam is an effective premedication in children for day-stay anaesthesia.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1994

Premedication with oral midazolam in children--an assessment of psychomotor function, anxiolysis, sedation and pharmacokinetics.

We studied 30 children, aged 4 to 12 years, undergoing elective circumcision, premedicated with midazolam 0.5 mg.kg-1 and atropine 0.02 mg.kg-1 by mouth. A modified postbox test and the coding component of the Wechsler intelligence scale (WISC-R) was used to assess the preoperative effect of premedication on psychomotor function. Mood and sedation were also scored and related to serum midazolam concentrations. The children showed a significant decline in psychomotor performance 30 and 60 minutes after premedication when compared with their best unmedicated performance recorded the previous evening. This decline in psychomotor performance was only weakly associated with serum midazolam concentrations (r = 0.1). The postbox toy ratio is a suitable measurement of psychomotor performance in children because of its simplicity and ease of use in the clinical environment, although it may suffer the "test-retest" limitations of similar types of assessment. The sedative and anxiolytic effects of midazolam provide a quiet environment for a smooth induction of anaesthesia.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

The effect of oral clonidine premedication on lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure in humans.

Alpha-2 adrenergic agonists including clonidine decrease cerebral blood flow. The specific actions of clonidine on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure in humans remain to be elucidated. We evaluated the effect of oral clonidine premedication on lumbar CSF pressure in patients without intracranial disease. Seventy-four patients undergoing subarachnoidal block were divided randomly into either a clonidine or a control group. In the clonidine group, the patients were premedicated orally with 5 microg/kg clonidine 60 min before arrival in the operating room. Subarachnoidal puncture was performed via midline approach using a 23-gauge needle at the L2-3 or L3-4 intervertebral space with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. Before the injection of local anesthetic, lumbar CSF pressure was measured. Lumbar CSF pressure was 8.1+/-2.4 mmHg in the clonidine group, which was significantly lower than that in the control group (9.4+/-2.8 mmHg, p<0.05). The cerebral perfusion pressures were 76.2+/-12.5 mmHg in the clonidine group and 91.7+/- 15.4 mmHg in the control group (p<0.001). In the clonidine group, preanesthetic mean blood pressure had a significant correlation with lumbar CSF pressure (r=0.619, p=0.019). We conclude that Lumbar CSF pressure was attenuated by oral premedication with 5 microg/kg clonidine. Clonidine also contributed to a significant correlation between preanesthetic mean blood pressure and CSF pressure.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

Midazolam premedication in children: a pilot study comparing intramuscular and intranasal administration.

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of intramuscular and intranasal midazolam used as a premedication before intravenous conscious sedation. Twenty-three children who were scheduled to receive dental treatment under intravenous sedation participated. The patients ranged in age from 2 to 9 years (mean age, 5.13 years) and were randomly assigned to receive a dose of 0.2 mg/kg of midazolam premedication via either intramuscular or intranasal administration. All patients received 50% nitrous oxide and 50% oxygen inhalation sedation and local anesthetic (0.2 mL of 4% prilocaine hydrochloride) before venipuncture. The sedation level, movement, and crying were evaluated at the following time points: 10 minutes after drug administration and at the times of parental separation, passive papoose board restraint, nitrous oxide nasal hood placement, local anesthetic administration, and initial venipuncture attempt. Mean ratings for the behavioral parameters of sedation level, degree of movement, and degree of crying were consistently higher but not significant in the intramuscular midazolam group at all 6 assessment points. Intramuscular midazolam was found to be statistically more effective in providing a better sedation level and less movement at the time of venipuncture than intranasal administration. Our findings indicate a tendency for intramuscular midazolam to be more effective as a premedication before intravenous sedation.

Administration, Intranasal↗