Nitrate reductase in Agrostemma githago. Comparison of the inductive effects of nitrate and cytokinin.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The effects of two kinds of Escherichia coli (E. coli) strain, wild-type E. coli W3110 and E. coli nir-Ptac, which has enhanced NO(2) reduction activity, on oral CH(4) emission and NO(3) toxicity in NO(3)-treated sheep were assessed in a respiratory hood system in a 4 x 6 Youden square design. NO(3) (1.3 g NaNO(3)/kg(0.75) body weight) and/or E. coli strains were delivered into the rumen through a fistula as a single dose 30 min after the morning meal. Escherichia coli cells were inoculated for sheep to provide an initial E. coli cell density of optical density at 660 nm of 2, which corresponded to 2 x 10(10) cells/ml. The six treatments consisted of saline, E. coli W3110, E. coli nir-Ptac, NO(3), NO(3) plus E. coli W3110, and NO(3) plus E. coli nir-Ptac. CH(4) emission from sheep was reduced by the inoculation of E. coli W3110 or E. coli nir-Ptac by 6 % and 12 %, respectively. NO(3) markedly inhibited CH(4) emission from sheep. Compared with sheep given NO(3) alone, the inoculation of E. coli W3110 to NO(3)-infused sheep lessened ruminal and plasma toxic NO(2) accumulation and blood methaemoglobin production, while keeping ruminal methanogenesis low. Ruminal and plasma toxic NO(2) accumulation and blood methaemoglobin production in sheep were unaffected by the inoculation of E. coli nir-Ptac. These results suggest that ruminal methanogenesis may be reduced by the inoculation of E. coli W3110 or E. coli nir-Ptac. The inoculation of E. coli W3110 may abate NO(3) toxicity when NO(3) is used to inhibit CH(4) emission from ruminants.
Arabidopsis thaliana mutants deficient for the NRT1.1 NO(3)(-) transporter display complex phenotypes, including lowered NO(3)(-) uptake, altered development of nascent organs, and reduced stomatal opening. To obtain further insight at the molecular level on the multiple physiological functions of NRT1.1, we performed large-scale transcript profiling by serial analysis of gene expression in the roots of the chl1-5 deletion mutant of NRT1.1 and of the Columbia wild type. Several hundred genes were differentially expressed between the two genotypes, when plants were grown on NH(4)NO(3) as N source. Among these genes, the N satiety-repressed NRT2.1 gene, encoding a major component of the root high-affinity NO(3)(-) transport system (HATS), was found to be strongly derepressed in the chl1-5 mutant (as well as in other NRT1.1 mutants). This was associated with a marked stimulation of the NO(3)(-) HATS activity in the mutant, suggesting adaptive response to a possible N limitation resulting from NRT1.1 mutation. However, derepression of NRT2.1 in NH(4)NO(3)-fed chl1-5 plants could not be attributed to lowered production of N metabolites. Rather, the results show that normal regulation of NRT2.1 expression is strongly altered in the chl1-5 mutant, where this gene is no more repressible by high N provision to the plant. This indicates that NRT1.1 plays an unexpected but important role in the regulation of both NRT2.1 expression and NO(3)(-) HATS activity. Overexpression of NRT2.1 was also found in wild-type plants supplied with 1 mM NH(4)(+) plus 0.1 mM NO(3)(-), a situation where NRT1.1 is likely to mediate very low NO(3)(-) transport. Thus, we suggest that it is the lack of NRT1.1 activity, rather than the absence of this transporter, that derepresses NRT2.1 expression in the presence of NH(4)(+). Two hypotheses are discussed to explain these results: (1) NRT2.1 is upregulated by a NO(3)(-) demand signaling, indirectly triggered by lack of NRT1.1-mediated uptake, which overrides feedback repression by N metabolites, and (2) NRT1.1 plays a more direct signaling role, and its transport activity generates an unknown signal required for NRT2.1 repression by N metabolites. Both mechanisms would warrant that either NRT1.1 or NRT2.1 ensure significant NO(3)(-) uptake in the presence of NH(4)(+) in the external medium, which is crucial to prevent the detrimental effects of pure NH(4)(+) nutrition.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.