Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Estramustine”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19Linked to original sources
PubMed1994

Estramustine: a novel radiation enhancer in human carcinoma cells.

PURPOSE: Estramustine (EM), an antimicrotubule agent, binds microtubule-associated proteins, causes spindle disassembly, and arrests cells at the late G2/M phase of the cell cycle. Since cells in the G2/M phase are the most radiosensitive and some human cancer cells contain high level of EM-binding protein, experiments were carried out to determine whether radiation sensitization could be obtained in human carcinoma cells. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Cells containing a high level of EM-binding protein such as prostate carcinoma (DU-145), breast carcinoma (MCF-7), and malignant glioma (U-251) were used to demonstrate radiosensitization. Cervical carcinoma (HeLa-S3) and colon carcinoma (HT-29) cells which are not known to contain EM-binding protein were also employed. Cell survival was assayed by the colony forming ability of single plated cells in culture to obtain dose-survival curves. RESULTS: Pretreatment of DU-145, MCF-7, and U-251 cells to a nontoxic concentration (5 microM) of EM for more than one cell cycle time, substantially enhanced the radiation-induced cytotoxicity. The sensitizer enhancement ratio of these cells ranged from 1.35-1.52. The magnitude of the enhancement was dependent on the drug concentration and exposure time. The rate of cell accumulation in G2/M phase, as determined by flow cytometry, increased with longer treatment time in the cell lines which showed radiosensitization. Other antimicrotubule agents such as taxol and vinblastine caused minimal or no radiosensitization at nontoxic concentrations. CONCLUSION: The data provide a radiobiological basis for using EM as a novel radiation enhancer, with the property of tissue selectivity.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1990

Comparison of the effects of high dose Estramustine phosphate and mitomycin C on the time to progression and length of survival of patients with progressive, advanced endocrine-independent prostatic cancer: an interim analysis of EORTC-GU Group study no. 30865.

Patients with hormone escaped advanced progressive prostate cancer were randomized either to receive either high-dose Estramustine phosphate orally or Mitomycin C by i.v. injection every 6 weeks until signs of progression or death supervened. Patients on both arms progressed rapidly, with a median time to progression of 5 months and a median length of survival of only 10 months. Toxicity was very considerable in both arms.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2004

Gene expression profiling reveals novel targets of estramustine phosphate in prostate cancer cells.

Estramustine phosphate (EMP) is a compound widely used for the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer. In order to better understand the precise molecular mechanism(s) by which EMP exerts its effects on hormone-resistant PC3 prostate cancer cells, we have utilized microarray to interrogate 22,215 known genes to determine the gene expression profiles altered by EMP treatment. The purpose of this investigation was to identify gene expression profile first and then in future studies determine the specific role of these genes in EMP-induced apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. We found a total of 726 genes which showed >2 fold change after EMP treatment. Clustering analysis showed 12 different types of expression alteration. These genes were also subjected to cluster analysis according to their biological functions. We found that EMP regulated the expression of genes, which are critically involved in the regulation of cell growth, cell cycle, apoptosis, iron homeostasis, cytoskeleton and cell signaling transduction. Real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis was used to confirm the results of microarray, and the results of real-time quantitative RT-PCR were consistent with the microarray data. From these results, we conclude that EMP caused changes in the expression of a large number of genes that are related to the control of cell survival and physiological behaviors. The gene expression profiles may provide comprehensive molecular mechanism(s) by which EMP exerts its pleiotropic effects on prostate cancer cells. EMP-induced regulation of these genes may be further exploited for devising therapeutic strategies for prostate cancer.

Estramustine↗
PubMed2005

The Val158Met polymorphism of the catechol-O-methyltransferase gene is associated with the PSA-progression-free survival in prostate cancer patients treated with estramustine phosphate.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study is to find out the good responders for estramustine phosphate (EMP) therapy in patients with prostate cancer. We have focused on the metabolism of EMP and studied the association between a functional single-nucleotide polymorphism in the catechol-O-methyltransferase gene (Val158Met of COMT) and PSA-progression-free survival in Japanese patients with prostate cancer treated by EMP. METHODS: Seventy-two Japanese patients with previously untreated prostate cancer who were found to be eligible for low-dose EMP therapy were enrolled in the study. Genotyping of the Val158Met polymorphism of COMT was conducted by both the polymerase chain reaction-based restriction fragment length polymorphism method and TaqMan assay. RESULTS: Patients with the Val/Val genotype of COMT had a significantly higher PSA-progression-free rate as compared to those with the Val/Met or Met/Met genotype (p=0.027). The adjusted hazard ratio of biochemical PSA failure for the Val158Met genotype of COMT was 2.164 (95% CI, 1.111 to 5.525). CONCLUSIONS: The Val158Met polymorphism of COMT is associated with the PSA-progression-free rate of EMP-treated patients in prostate cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Phase-II study of docetaxel, estramustine phosphate, and carboplatin in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety and efficacy of combination chemotherapy with docetaxel (DTX), estramustine phosphate (EMP), and carboplatin (CBDCA) in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). METHODS: This study included a total of 40 HRPC patients. We evaluated the activity of the following schedule: weekly DTX 30 mg/m(2) iv, daily EMP 10mg/kg po, and CBDCA AUC=6 iv on day 1 of a every 4-wk cycle. Treatment was continued until disease progression or excessive toxicity. RESULTS: All patients were assessable for response. A median of six consecutive cycles was administered per patient. Levels of prostate-specific antigen decreased by more than 50% in 95.0% of the patients. Consumption of medication for cancer-induced pain was reduced in 84.6%. Partial response was attained in 66.7% of measurable lesions. Of patients with bone metastasis, 8.3% demonstrated partial response. With a median follow-up of 11.4 mo, the median time to progression was 12.0 mo, and the median overall survival time was 26.6 mo. The predominant toxicities were grade-3 or -4 anemia in 32.5% of the patients, leukopenia in 20.0%, and thrombocytopenia in 17.5%. However, all toxicity was temporary and reversible with dose reduction or temporary cessation of chemotherapeutic agents. There were no therapy-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Combination chemotherapy with DTX/EMP/CBDCA was found to have significant clinical activity with an acceptable toxicity profile in HRPC patients. More suitable selection of patients may be beneficial in terms of improved overall survival in the future.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Combination of docetaxel, estramustine phosphate, and zoledronic acid in androgen-independent metastatic prostate cancer: efficacy, safety, and clinical benefit assessment.

OBJECTIVES: Docetaxel is an effective agent for the treatment of androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC). Its combination with estramustine phosphate (EMP) has shown promising results in AIPC but the toxicity remains considerable. In an effort to minimize toxicity, we designed an every-2-week docetaxel administration regimen with a 3-day low-dose EMP regimen. Patients with bone metastases also received zoledronic acid. METHODS: A total of 54 patients with AIPC received docetaxel at 45 mg/m2 and EMP (140 mg orally every 8 hours for nine doses) every 2 weeks. Zoledronic acid was administered at 4 mg every 28 days. RESULTS: Of the 49 assessable patients, 22 (45%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 31% to 60%) had a prostate-specific antigen response. Of 24 patients with measurable disease, 9 (38%, 95% CI 19% to 59%) had a response to therapy (one complete response and eight partial responses). The median time to progression was 4.4 months (95% CI 2.7 to 6), and overall survival was 13.3 months (95% CI 9 to 17.6). Toxicity was mild, with only 5 cases of grade 3 or 4 toxicity. The pain score improved by 1 point in 21 (54%) of 39 symptomatic patients, and 14 (40%) of 38 patients who used analgesics discontinued analgesic consumption by the end of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of an every-2-week regimen of docetaxel, EMP, and zoledronic acid is an effective, well-tolerated regimen that results in symptomatic improvement in a significant proportion of patients with AIPC.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Combination chemotherapy with docetaxel, estramustine and suramin for hormone refractory prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate more effective chemotherapy against hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) with the combination of estramustine (EM), docetaxel, and suramin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 42 patients with symptomatic, progressive HRPC were included in this study. We evaluated the activity of the following schedule: EM 10 mg/kg orally daily on Days 1 to 21 every 28 days, docetaxel 70 mg/m(2) IV on Day 2 every 28 days and a total doses of 2150 mg of suramin in every cycle. Treatment was continued until disease progression or excessive toxicity. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 23.4 months. A median of 8.8 consecutive cycles was administered per patient. In the 25 patients with lymphadenopathy, there were three (12%) complete and 18 (72%) partial responses for a measurable disease response rate of 84%. Levels of prostatic specific antigen (PSA) decreased by greater than 50% in 100% of patients and by greater than 90% in 76.2%. The median time to progression was 57 weeks and median overall survival was 132 weeks. A decline in PSA of > or =50% lasting > or =30 days was significantly associated with a prolonged median time to progression and median overall survival. Tumor volume reduction and/or antitumor treatment effects were observed in 88% of patients. A significant decrease in mean pain score from 7.8 (range, 6-10) to 2.2 (range, 0-4) (P < 0.001) was achieved in 78%. Of patients with bone metastasis, 30.5% demonstrated a partial response. The mean Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score improved from 2.8 to 1.5 at the end of treatment period. There was no therapy-related death. The predominant toxicities were Grade 3 or 4 leukopenia in 33.3%, anemia in 21%, thrombocytopenia in 21.4%, cardiac ischemia in 4.7%, and rash in 4.7%. CONCLUSION: The combination of docetaxel, EM, and suramin is a highly effective regimen for HRPC. Although hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities were modest, these were easily managed medically.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1993

Inhibition of prostate cancer growth by estramustine and etoposide: evidence for interaction at the nuclear matrix.

Metastatic prostate cancer which is refractory to hormone therapy remains an incurable disease for which there is no effective therapy. We have begun to investigate the nuclear matrix, the RNA-protein network of the nucleus that plays an important role in DNA replication and gene expression, as a target for cancer chemotherapy. It was postulated that estramustine phosphate (EMP), an estradiol-nitrogen mustard conjugate that binds to the nuclear matrix, might enhance the cytotoxicity of etoposide (VP-16), a topoisomerase II inhibitor that acts at the level of the nuclear matrix. In a nascent DNA synthesis assay, EMP and etoposide interact to selectively inhibit new DNA synthesis on the nuclear matrix. In vitro, EMP and etoposide appeared to act synergistically to inhibit the growth of the metastatic Dunning rat prostate adenocarcinoma cell line Mat-LyLu as well as the metastatic human prostate adenocarcinoma cell line PC-3. In vivo, EMP and etoposide inhibited prostate adenocarcinoma growth in the Dunning Copenhagen rat model. These data have formed the basis of a Phase I/II clinical trial to examine the effect of EMP and etoposide in patients with stage D hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1992

Estramustine and vinblastine: use of prostate specific antigen as a clinical trial end point for hormone refractory prostatic cancer.

The combination of estramustine phosphate and vinblastine sulfate, 2 agents with separate and unique antimicrotubular effects, has demonstrated additive cytotoxicity against the DU145 human prostate derived cell line in vitro. We evaluated this combination in 25 patients with progressive hormone refractory prostate cancer. Of 24 patients with an elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) level at the start of treatment 13 (54%, 95% confidence limits 34 to 74%) had a greater than 50% decrease in PSA levels on at least 3 consecutive biweekly determinations. The median decrease in PSA in responding patients was 64% (mean 71.7%) and the median duration of response was 7 months. In 5 patients with bidimensionally measurable disease 2 partial responses were observed. Treatment was well tolerated, with mild and manageable toxicity. This is a well tolerated outpatient treatment regimen for patients with hormone-refractory prostatic cancer which deserves further investigation.

Aged↗
PubMed1982

Effects of diethylstilbestrol and estramustine phosphate (Estracyt) on lymphoid cell populations and mitogen responsiveness in male mice.

Concentrations of diethylstilbestrol phosphate (DES-P) and estramustine phosphate (EMP) above 10(-5) M in cultures of spleen lymphocytes from adult male mice resulted in a dose related inhibition of both Con A and LPS induced lymphocyte proliferation. Male mice injected with 5.6 mg./kg. DES daily for 7 days had a significantly reduced responsiveness to both Con A and LPS compared to mice injected with olive oil only. Spleen lymphocytes from male mice treated with 100 mg./kg. EMP showed a reduction of Con A induced mitogenesis whereas they exhibited a significantly enhanced response to LPS. The effects of DES and EMP on Con A and LPS induced blastogenesis were abolished within 2 weeks after cessation of treatment. DES treatment resulted in preferential depletion of splenic and lymph node T lymphocytes and a disproportionate T lymphocyte subpopulation with respect to Ly subclasses. Exposure to 30 or 100 mg./kg. EMP resulted in a dose related loss of mononuclear cells both in spleen and lymph nodes. T lymphocytes predominantly of the Ly 1 phenotype were most sensitive to EMP. Co-cultures of spleen lymphocytes from normal mice and Mitomycin C blocked spleen cells from either normal of treated mice (DES or EMP) gave no convincing evidence of suppressor cell activity in the population of spleen mononuclear cells.

Animals↗
PubMed1976

Primary treatment of prostatic carcinoma with estramustine phosphate: preliminary report.

Estramustine phosphate has been used as primary treatment in 38 patients with advanced prostatic carcinoma. Of these 38 patients 36 responded objectively to treatment, regression occurring in 10 patients with soft tissue metastases, 3 with pulmonary metastases and 3 with bony metastases. Primary cytotoxic treatment in patients with far advanced prostatic carcinoma is advocated and a randomized clinical study is suggested.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Phase I trial of weekly paclitaxel plus oral estramustine phosphate in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To exploit the favorable dose intensity and safety profile of weekly paclitaxel, we conducted a Phase I trial of paclitaxel by 3-hour infusion in combination with estramustine phosphate (EM) in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). The antimicrotubule drug combination of paclitaxel by 96-hour infusion plus EM is active in HRPC. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with metastatic HRPC and progressive tumor after antiandrogen withdrawal were enrolled in this study. Oral EM was taken at a dose of 600 mg/m(2) daily for the initial 21 patients and on a reduced schedule of 280 mg twice daily for the final 3 patients. Paclitaxel was escalated from 60 to 118 mg/m(2). RESULTS: The major toxicities were gastrointestinal and thromboembolic complications related to daily oral dosing of EM. Of the first 21 patients, one third (n = 7) discontinued therapy within 4 weeks because of protracted nausea and/or thrombotic complications. Dose-limiting toxicities at 118 mg/m(2) paclitaxel were fatigue and hepatotoxicity. Of 13 patients with measurable soft-tissue lesions, 6 had objective partial regressions, and 9 (37.5%) of 24 patients (95% confidence interval 19.1% to 59.1%) with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels had a 50% or greater decline of at least 4 weeks' duration. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly paclitaxel at doses of 60 to 107 mg/m(2) were feasible in combination with oral EM, but daily oral EM produced unacceptable toxicity. On the basis of these results, a Phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel with the reduced dose and schedule of EM was initiated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group to assess further the benefits and risks of this treatment in men with metastatic HRPC.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1997

Combined hormono/chemotherapy as primary treatment for metastatic prostate cancer: a randomized, multicenter study of orchiectomy alone versus orchiectomy plus estramustine phosphate. The Dutch Estracyt Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: Based on the theory that hormone-resistant cells are present in all metastatic patients, early administration of chemotherapy appears to be logical and its use is supported by experimental studies. Therefore, trials with combined hormonal and cytotoxic treatment as primary therapy should be conducted. In the present trial, the efficacy and tolerance of estramustine phosphate (EMP) as a chemotherapeutic agent in addition to hormonal treatment (orchiectomy) was studied in patients with metastatic and nonmetastatic prostate cancer not previously treated. EMP was chosen because it produces few serious adverse reactions and no cumulative toxicity. METHODS: Four hundred nineteen patients were included in a 1.5-year period starting in January 1989. Patients with locally advanced prostate cancer or with bone metastases were randomized to orchiectomy (O) or orchiectomy followed by EMP (O + E), given until progression. RESULTS: Analysis of the total group showed no significant difference in time to progression between the treatment groups. Because the course of the disease is different in patients with either T4 tumor only or with lymph node metastases only (M0) as compared with patients with bone metastases (M1) and because the number of progressions in the M0 patients was low, corresponding analyses were performed for these subgroups as well. In the M1 patients, there was a tendency for a longer time to progression in the O + E group than in the O group, but there was no indication of a difference between the groups with regard to survival. In the M0 patients, there was no indication of any difference in results between the treatments. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors showed pain, alkaline phosphatase, metastasis status, and tumor stage to be significant factors. There was a relation between age and drug treatment in that a significant beneficial effect of EMP in terms of prolonged progression-free interval as well as survival was evident in younger patients (aged less than 73 years) with metastatic disease. Tumor stage was also of importance for the drug effect; T0 to T3 patients who received EMP survived longer than those who were treated with orchiectomy only. The most common adverse reaction was nausea in the O + E group, which led to discontinuation of the drug in 7 patients. Cardiovascular problems are not uncommon in this age group, and there was a higher incidence of cardiovascular events, predominantly cardiac failure, in the O + E group, leading to treatment interruption in 16 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that future studies of hormono/chemotherapy should focus on younger patients with bone metastases.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Docetaxel, estramustine, and short-term androgen withdrawal for patients with biochemical failure after definitive local therapy for prostate cancer.

Over the past 10 years, men with prostate cancer have received earlier diagnoses and are undergoing prostatectomy and/or radiation therapy with curative intent; however, many men have increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels without evidence of local progression or metastatic disease during the first 2 years after definitive local therapy. Optimal treatment of men with PSA-only recurrent prostate cancer has not been established. This ongoing phase II trial is evaluating docetaxel (70 mg/m(2) administered intravenously over 1 hour on day 2 every 21 days for four cycles) and estramustine (10 mg/kg/d orally on days 1 to 5 every 21 days for four cycles) followed by bicalutamide and goserelin acetate in men with increasing PSA levels after prostatectomy and/or radiation therapy. Patients received pretreatment with dexamethasone, and after the third patient enrolled, patients received warfarin for prophylaxis against thrombosis. Colony-stimulating factor support was allowed. In preliminary results, 11 of 15 patients completed protocol chemotherapy; 12 of 15 patients achieved complete response (ie, normalization of PSA) after four cycles of chemotherapy. In addition, testosterone levels were reduced to the castrate range in all patients after chemotherapy. The regimen was generally well tolerated, and toxicities were mostly hematologic, with grade (3/4) neutropenia reported in approximately half of patients. Preliminary results of this phase II trial are encouraging, and enrollment is ongoing.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1999

Serotoninergic modulation of cell volume response to estramustine: an image-analysis study on perifused individual glioma cells.

A technique of microscopy with computerised detection of early morphological changes during continuous perifusion was used to monitor the geometry changes of cultured glioma cells (MG-251) when exposed to 40 mg/L estramustine phosphate (EMP) alone or in combination with granisetron (0.1 mumol/L), ondansetron (0.1 mumol/L), or serotonin (1 mumol/L). When the cells were exposed to EMP, cell volume measured as projected cell area (PCA) rapidly increased. Serotonin and ondansetron, but not granisetron, prevented the acute EMP response (PCA). Serotonin, but none of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, protected against the cytotoxicity of EMP to the glioma cells as measured by a fluorometric microculture assay. Our results demonstrate hitherto unknown differences between selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist on the cellular response to EMP and shows the necessity to study the receptor antagonists from viewpoint of interference with the antitumour drug effects on malignant cells. The perifusion technique could be used to study the effects of serotoninergic agonists and antagonists on cell volume regulation of cells exposed to anticancer drugs.

Cell Size↗
PubMed1999

Phase I trial of the combination of daily estramustine phosphate and intermittent docetaxel in patients with metastatic hormone refractory prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To apply our preclinical findings of cytotoxic synergy with the combination of estramustine phosphate (EP) and docetaxel as the basis of treatment of hormone refractory metastatic prostate cancer in man. To determine the optimal dosage and the toxicities of these two agents for future trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventeen patients with hormone refractory metastatic prostate cancer who were ambulatory with performance status < or = 2, normal marrow, renal and hepatic function were entered. Prior exposure to EP or a taxane were exclusion factors. EP was given orally at a dose of 14 mg/kg of body weight daily with concurrent docetaxel administered every 21 days as an intravenous infusion over 1 hour with dexamethasone 8 mg. PO BID for five days. EP dosages were kept static; docetaxel dosages were explored in a minimum of three patients per level for dosages of 40, 60, 70, and 80 mg/m2. Patients were evaluated weekly. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) was measured every three weeks. RESULTS: Five patients were entered at a docetaxel dose of 40 mg/m2, three at 60 mg/m2, six at 70 mg/m2, and three at 80 mg/m2. Only one patient had received prior chemotherapy. Grades 1 or 2 hypocalcemia and hypophosphatemia were seen at all dosage levels. Other grade 2 or less toxicities not related to dosage included alopecia, anorexia, stomatitis, diarrhea, and epigastric pain. Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) as grade 4 leukopenia and grade 4 fatigue were seen at 80 mg/m2. The phase II dose was defined at 70 mg/m2 with rapidly reversible leukopenia and minor liver function abnormalities. At this dosing level, dose intensity was 88% and 86% over consecutive cycles for docetaxel and EP, respectively. Two vascular events occurred at this dose level (70 mg/m2): one arterial and the other venous. PSA decreases greater than 50% from baseline were seen in 14 of 17 patients at all dosage levels. Four of the 17 patients demonstrated a complete biochemical response (PSA < or = 4 ng/ml). One patient had a partial response with measurable lung and liver lesions. CONCLUSION: EP given continuously with every three-week docetaxel at a dose of 70 mg/m2 is tolerable with evidence of antitumor activity based upon significant declines in PSA in the majority of patients and improvement of lung metastasis in one patient. Larger phase II studies of this combination in a homogenous population are warranted.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

The bleb formation of the extracellular pseudopodia; early evidence of microtubule depolymerization by estramustine phosphate in glioma cell; in vitro study.

Estramustine phosphate (EMP) is an anti-microtubule agent that depolymerizes microtubules and also causes apoptosis of glioma cells. Both of these pharmacological actions have been previously studied within the same cytotoxic range of EMP concentrations. The purpose of this study was to investigate which of these two phenomena occurred before the other. A preliminary MTT assay was done to distinguish non-cytotoxic (0.005-0.1 microM) and cytotoxic (0.5-10 microM) of EMP for BT4C cells. To investigate apoptotic changes, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), DNA laddering, and in situ endo-labeling (TUNEL) method were employed. A chemotaxis assay was used to assess cell motility. Scanning electron microscopy and TEM immunocytochemistry with an anti-beta tubulin antibody were applied to detect morphological changes of the microtubules. Suppression of cell motility by cytotoxic doses of EMP (0.5-10 microM) group was attributed by the cyto-reductive effect, relating to apoptosis. At 0.01-0.1 microM (non-cytotoxic doses), EMP did not indue apoptosis. At these concentrations, TEM and immunohistochemistry revealed the formation of blebs on the tip of the pseudopodia that contained abnormally depolymerized microtubules, a finding that was not observed at a low temperature or during cell migration. Cell chemotaxis was significantly inhibited by cytostatic EMP doses (0.05 and 0.1 microM). Bleb formation of the pseudopodia might be evidence of the abnormal disassembly of microtubules by cytostatic EMP concentrations, prior to the induction of apoptosis. In glioma cells EMP probably initiates apoptosis by causing the depolymerization of microtubules. Inhibition of cell motility by cytostatic doses of EMP could be beneficial to support other therapies.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

The impact of docetaxel, estramustine, and low dose hydrocortisone on the quality of life of men with hormone refractory prostate cancer and their partners: a feasibility study.

OBJECTIVES: The quality of life (QoL) of 44 men with HRPC and 37 partners (primary caregivers, most residing with the patient) was assessed in a multicenter Phase II trial of docetaxel, estramustine and low dose hydrocortisone (CALGB 9780). A secondary objective was to test the feasibility of assessing partners' QoL in a cooperative group setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients and partners were separately interviewed by telephone at baseline, two, four and six months by a single trained research interviewer. Patients' QoL was measured by the FACT-P, Mental Health Inventory-17 (MHI-17), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), a two-day log of pain medications, and the OARS for co-morbid conditions. Partners' QoL was measured by the MHI-17, Caregiver Burden Interview, and co-morbid conditions. RESULTS: The QoL study refusal rates were low for patients (4%) and partners (3%). Although patients tended to experience greater treatment side effects in the first two months (FACT Physical Well-Being item, P = 0.057), their cancer-specific emotions (e.g., worrying about worsening health) significantly improved at two and four months (FACT-Emotional Well-Being, P = 0.003, P = 0.03, respectively), as did their prostate cancer-specific physical problems (e.g., urination, pain), at two and four months (FACT-P, P = 0.001, P = 0.005, respectively). Partners' anxiety significantly decreased over time (MHI, P < 0.05). Patients' quality of life at two months was significantly related to their clinical response (FACT-P total and prostate cancer-specific problems, P < 0.05), and their clinical response was significantly related to a decrease in their partners' anxiety at two months (MHI, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite feeling worse from side effects, patients' prostate cancer-specific problems and emotional state significantly improved in the first four months of treatment. With treatment significantly affecting both patients' and partners' lives. and the successful assessment of partners' QoL, QoL of both patients and partners could be used as important endpoints in selected clinical trials.

Administration, Oral↗