Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Embryonic Induction”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19Linked to original sources

Schwann cell-derived desert hedgehog signals nerve sheath formation.

Reciprocal signaling between axons and Schwann cells during development is well established. The contribution of Schwann cells to the formation and maintenance of the protective nerve sheaths (endo-, peri-, and epineurium) has been less studied. Although mesenchymal cells contribute to all these structures, only perineurial cells contribute to the diffusion barrier between nerves and surrounding tissues. During development, prospective perineurial cells shift from a mesenchymal to epithelial phenotype, forming concentric layers of cells around the nerve fascicles that collectively form a barrier against unwanted molecules and cellular infiltration. We have studied the role of Schwann cells in the formation and maintenance of this barrier. The signaling molecule Desert hedgehog is expressed in Schwann cell precursors, and in Schwann cells until at least postnatal day 10, while its receptor patched is seen in mesenchymal cells surrounding the developing nerve at embryo day 15. In Desert hedgehog knockout mice, the connective tissue sheaths in adult nerves appear highly abnormal by electron microscopy. There is almost no epineurium, and the perineurium is thin and highly abnormal. In addition, perineurial-like cells invade the endoneurial space, forming mini-fascicles around small bundles of nerve fibers similar to those seen in regenerating nerves. Functional tests reveal that the diffusion and cellular infiltration barrier is compromised, demonstrating that Desert hedgehog signaling from Schwann cells to the mesenchyme is involved in the formation of a morphologically and functionally normal perineurium.

Aging↗

[Hans Spemann, the founder of modern developmental biology].

Hans Spemann (1869-1941), Nobel laureate of 1935, is one of the most remarkable biologists of the 20th century and the founder of modern experimental embryology (developmental biology). His embryonic separation experiments contributed greatly to the long-lasting debate between the advocates of the theories of preformation vs. epigenesis, and his subsequent transplantation experiments laid the basis of the concept of embryonic induction. The first of these classic experiments can be precisely dated to May 8, 1921, when one of Spemannn's students, Hilde Pröscholdt, performed a transplantation experiment with a fragment of a new gastrula blastopore lip. The dates, operation strategies and findings have recently been confirmed when the original experimental protocols and slides were found. The findings and the idea of induction were published in 1924, and this fundamental paper is still widely quoted. As shown by a citation analysis, the article is today collecting an increasing number of quotations reflecting a Renaissance of the field. For the Finnish school of development biology, Spemann and his basic ideas have been of pivotal importance.

Embryology↗

Development shows some backbone. HFSP Workshop on Genetic Control of Vertebrate Development cosponsored by the Human Frontier Science Program, European Science Foundation, and European Molecular Biology Organization, Les Diablerets, Switzerland, May 26-30, 1991.

This meeting aptly illustrated the power of a combined analysis of development in a range of vertebrate systems. Each system has its own inherent strengths: the mouse has gene transfer technology and targeted mutagenesis, the frog and chick have experimental embryology, and the zebrafish has genetics. It is the synergistic effect of considering all of these systems in combination that is without measure. In the past, the study of vertebrate development has been relegated to a largely descriptive phase. Initially, this was through analysis of morphological changes taking place during development. More recently, this has taken the form of cataloging the expression patterns of genes transcribed in development. It is clear that we are now entering an era when a functional analysis of development can get underway.

Animals↗

[Developmental disorders of man. Part 2].

At the beginning of this century genetics arose out of developmental history (Entwicklungsgeschichte) as the science of the causal understanding of development. After Spemann's epochal discovery (justifiably rewarded with the Nobel Prize in 1935) of the organizer and the beginning of the experimental analysis of developmental fields, little or no progress was made until the last few years when a virtual revolution occurred in developmental biology. If nothing else, this revolution has re-inspired in medicine an enormous respect for developmental animal models which are homologous to the human condition in the strict sense of the term, both in formal (formalgenetischer) and causal (kausalgenetischer) respects. Thus, the earliest stages of development in the primary field (during gastrulation) and in the later mosaic of secondary, epimorphic fields, represents the harmonically coordinated and epigenetically regulated effects of many genes which (with of without imprinting) code for cellular adhesion molecules, the peptide regulatory factors, homeobox genes, retinoic acid receptors and many other genes. Some of these genes act as regulators of DNA transcription, and, until recently no clinically identifiable developmental attribute to their function was known in humans. However, just in the last few weeks we have witnessed the identification of a gene on 11p13 in humans which is a paired box- and homeobox-containing gene as the cause of human aniridia, with the identical (homologous) mutation in the mouse Pax-6 gene producing the Sey phenotype (small eye).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗

Retinoic acid and chick limb bud development.

The chick limb bud is a powerful experimental system in which to study pattern formation in vertebrate embryos. Exogenously applied retinoic acid, a vitamin A derivative, can bring about changes in pattern and, on several grounds, is a good candidate for an endogenous morphogen. As such, the local concentration of retinoic acid might provide cells with information about their position in relation to one axis of the limb. Alternatively, retinoic acid may be part of a more complex signalling system. Homeobox genes are possible target genes for regulation by retinoic acid in the limb. In particular, one homeobox gene, XlHbox 1 is expressed locally in the mesenchyme of vertebrate forelimbs and might code for an anterior position. When the pattern of the chick wing is changed by retinoic acid or by grafts of signalling tissue such that anterior cells now form posterior structures, the domain of XlHbox 1 expression expands rather than contracts. The expansion of XlHbox 1 expression correlates with shoulder girdle abnormalities. Retinoic acid application leads to visible changes in bud shape and this allows dissection of the way in which patterning is co-ordinated with morphogenesis. Results of recombination experiments and studies of changes in the apical ridge and proliferation in the mesenchyme suggest the following scheme: retinoic acid is involved in specification of position of mesenchyme cells; this specification determines their local interaction with the ridge that controls ridge morphology; the thickened apical ridge permits local proliferation in the underlying mesenchyme.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗

Patterning of connective tissues in the head: discussion report.

The three papers presented by Noden, Thorogood and Lumsden in this session encompassed the connective tissues as broadly defined, i.e. soft (fibrous) connective tissue, cartilage, bone, muscle and the dental tissues, enamel and dentine, and utilized a variety of experimental techniques on both avian and mammalian embryos to explore specificity and patterning of the vertebrate head. Whether similar developmental processes pattern homologous structures in different Vertebrate classes (Amphibia, Aves, Mammalia) was discussed with reference to patterning of the cranial musculature, chondrocranium and dental tissues. A number of challenging ideas emerged during this session. Does the premigratory neural crest consist of a homogenous population of totipotent cells or of subpopulations of bi- or tripotential cells? Is fundamental patterning of the head an early embryonic event, perhaps specified during primary embryonic induction or the consequence of neuroepithelial folding, brain growth, inductive interactions and/or spatially and temporally distributed extracellular matrix products? Can the fact that mesoderm and angioblasts do not display distinctive patterning that relates to their particular embryologic origins be extrapolated to patterning in general? How does the documentation of an odontogenic trunk neural crest in mammals affect our theories of how patterning mechanisms arose or were modified during vertebrate evolution?

Animals↗

Ectopic pulmonary cartilage and bone in domestic fowl.

The occurrence and histological appearance of ectopic pulmonary cartilage and bone in domestic fowl was investigated. Its incidence was shown to vary in different strains of birds. The structures may occur in newly hatched chicks and are similarly present in birds maintained on diets containing bonemeal and diets without it. They could not be experimentally induced by bronchial insufflation of fine bone particles. Previous theories of their genesis are discussed and it is concluded that they do not originate from either inhaled dietary bonemeal or disease processes but are probably abnormal embryonic induction of mesenchyme or cartilaginous germ cells displaced from adjacent bronchi.

Animals↗

Development of renal basement membrane glycoproteins in metanephric organ culture.

Because of the importance of renal basement membrane glycoproteins in normal and abnormal tubular and glomerular morphogenesis, structure, and function, the sequential development of fibronectin, GP-2, and entactin was studied in vivo and in a newly developed, serum-free mouse metanephric organ culture system. The organ culture system permits advanced tubular differentiation and glomerular epithelial development of whole metanephros without perfusion or urine formation. Affinity-purified antibodies and immunohistologic techniques were used, and the ontogeny of basement membrane glycoproteins was characterized in vivo and in vitro. It was thus possible to characterize the pattern of normal renal basement membrane glycoprotein production and to comparatively study renal glomerular and tubular basement membrane formation in the presence and the absence of endothelial and/or mesangial influences. Both in vivo and in vitro undifferentiated mesenchyme expressed fibronectin but not GP-2 or entactin. Further, both in vivo and in vitro, all three glycoproteins developed in the basement membranes of the earliest recognizable tubular and glomerular forms. Because of the sharp parallel between in vivo and in vitro basement membrane glycoprotein production we conclude that the whole organ metanephric culture system is a useful model for the study of renal basement membrane development. Further, based on the pattern of in vitro basement membrane production, it may be concluded that tubular and glomerular epithelial cells are capable of producing basement membrane glycoproteins in the absence of endothelial or recognizable mesangial cells following initial embryonic induction.

Animals↗

The evolution of vertebrate gastrulation.

The availability of molecular markers now permits the analysis of the common elements of vertebrate gastrulation. While gastrulation appears to be very diverse in the vertebrates, by analyzing a head-organizer marker, goosecoid, and a marker common to all forming mesoderm, Brachyury, we attempt to identify homologous structures and equivalent stages in Xenopus, zebrafish, chick and mouse gastrulation. Using a tail-organizer marker, Xnot-2, we also discuss how the late stages of gastrulation lead to the formation of the postanal tail, a structure characteristic of the chordates.

Animals↗

Development of the sheep ovary during fetal and early neonatal life and the effect of fecundity genes.

In female sheep fetuses, the mesonephros and genital ridge can be identified at days 20 and 23 of gestation (term = 145 days), respectively. Moreover oogonia can be observed at the genital ridge from as early as day 23. Around day 55 of gestation, some germ cells enter meiosis coincident with the arrival of mesonephric-derived somatic cells (i.e. the rete ovarii). From day 75, 100, 120 and 135 of gestation, primordial (one layer of flattened granulosa cells), primary (one complete layer of cuboidal granulosa cells; early preantral), secondary (preantral) and tertiary (antral) follicles, respectively, develop within the innermost regions of the ovarian cortex. During the early neonatal period highly variable numbers of antral follicles may be present. After examination of Booroola fetuses from day 28 of gestation, it seems that the FecBB gene is associated with retarded development of the heart (day 28) mesonephros (days 30-40) and from day 30 to early neonatal life, the ovary. With respect to the ovary, fewer oogonia (days 30-40), primordial follicles (day 75-90) and growing follicles (day 120 to 6 weeks after birth) have been observed in females carrying the FecBB gene. By contrast, the FecBB gene is not associated with differences in plasma gonadotrophin or immunoreactive inhibin until early neonatal life. In Inverdale (I) fetuses heterozygous for the FecXI gene (I+), retarded germ cell development was observed at days 40 and 90 of gestation. In putative homozygous carriers (II) of the Inverdale gene, germ cell development appeared normal until day 100, but thereafter from day 120 normal secondary follicles were not observed, although many abnormal follicular-like structures were present. In both I+ and II fetuses no obvious differences in gonadotrophin concentrations have been noted. Collectively, the evidence suggests that the fecundity genes FecBB and FecXI, which affect ovulation rate in sexually mature females, are regulating organ differentiation or germ cell maturation or both processes during fetal life.

Animals↗