Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Defecography”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

[Defecation properties after coloanal reconstruction in the pig model].

UNLABELLED: Defecation properties after coloanal reconstruction in the pig model. OBJECTIVE: Functional aspects after low anterior resection are of major interest. While patients with straight coloanal anastomoses may suffer from disabling stool frequency and incontinence, evacuation difficulties can be a problem in coloanal pouch anastomoses. The aim of the study was to investigate functional results by establishing a standardized defecation protocol after low anterior resection of the rectum in the pig model. METHOD: 24 adult Göttinger mini pigs were studied. They were randomly assigned to three groups: 8 animals served as control animals (group 1), the remaining 16 underwent low anterior resection with small colon-J-pouch (4-5 cm) reconstruction (n = 8) and large pouch design of 8-9 cm length (n = 8). The animals were investigated after 12 weeks postoperatively. Defecation properties we studied using a Ceruletide-induced defecography (0.3 microgram kgKG) with a 100 ml barium sulfate bolus, placed just above the anastomosis. RESULTS: Evacuation was significantly impaired in the large pouch (45 min.). However, the small pouches evacuated completely after 14 min. which was comparable to the unoperated controls (17.3 min.). CONCLUSION: Ceruletide-induced defecation reveals reproducible results in pigs. Evacualtion properties are highly depending upon the coloanal reconstruction. A small colon-J-pouch design reveals nearly physiologic results 3 months after surgery.

Anal Canal↗
PubMed2004

[Transanal staplermucosectomy for symptomatic rectocele with outlet obstruction].

Between 1.1.2001 and 30.6.2002 n = 52 female patients with symptomatic isolated anterior rectocele underwent transanal staplermucosectomy. All of them were suffering from outlet obstruction. In addition 9 patients complained incontinence grade I and n = 1 incontinence grade III. Complete colonoscopy, defecography and combined anal manometry with needle EMG were carried out preoperativly for exclusion of synchronous pathological findings. Sphinctermanometry showed a significant lower preoperative resting pressure (p < 0.01, t-test ) of 77.0 +/- 21.0 cm H (2)O in comparison to a normal collective. Surgical procedure consisted in a modified staplerresection of the rectocele area with tightening of the anterior rectal wall. No intraoperative complications occurred and outlet obstruction disappeared in all patients. Further investigations have to be performed to show long-term effects of this procedure.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

[Giant fecaliths in habitual constipation].

HISTORY AND FINDINGS: A 17-year old adolescent with chronic constipation developed fecal incontinence with liquid, fetid stool. He had had variable bowel symptoms since early childhood, but not in his infancy. Since several years he had undergone psychotherapeutic treatment for depression due to a familial conflict situation. Abdominal palpation revealed the presence of a large, hard mass in the lower abdomen, measuring about 20 cm in diameter. INVESTIGATIONS: A defecography verified the presence of a huge obstructing fecalith in the rectum, with massive dilation and elongation of the antecedent rectum and colon (megarectum and megacolon). Neither endoscopy nor radiological imaging revealed a narrow bowel segment. In sequential biopsies, no indication of aberrant innervation was found. The recto-anal inhibitory reflex could be elicited. TREATMENT AND COURSE: Restoration of the rectal passage was achieved by manual disimpaction in numerous sessions, supported by repeated rectal enemas. Subsequently, the patient had normal daily bowel movements for a few days. However, he had to be readmitted three weeks later because again a fecalith had formed, measuring 15 cm in diameter. A few days after discharge the patient hat not followed the exhortation to void ad least once per day. After renewed disimpaction he was referred to a psychosomatic clinic. CONCLUSION: Voluntary withholding of defecation can eventuate massive coprostasis and the development of megacolon and megarectum. In theses instances the major complaint may not be constipation but paradoxical diarrhea. A number of conditions have to be excluded before the diagnosis idiopathic megacolon can be confirmed. Treatment ist difficult and often necessitates prolonged and repetitious interventions.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Prerectal peritoneal pouch with herniating small bowel -- a unique cause of severe constipation in a child.

We report a 14-year-old boy with severe constipation with a four-year history of no spontaneous bowel movements. Defecography, with synchronously administered barium enema and barium meal, showed that the small bowel could slide down in front of the rectum obstructing defecation. He was operated and a prerectal peritoneal pouch was found, which was resected. Postoperatively he has had daily spontaneous bowel movements. We have found no similar case described in the literature.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Chronic constipation in adults. How far should evaluation and treatment go?

In all patients who present with constipation, a history should be taken and physical examination and proctosigmoidoscopy performed. Structural evaluation of the entire colon by barium enema should be considered when constipation is of recent onset, is severe, or does not resolve with simple measures. A colonic transit study should also be considered in the latter two situations. Anorectal manometry, defecography, and electromyography are helpful in patients with diagnosed or suspected outlet delay. Treatment is most often empirical. Simple, helpful measures include education, dietary fiber supplementation, adequate fluid intake, and regular physical activity. When laxatives are necessary, they should be used sparingly. Pelvic floor retraining may be helpful in the management of patients with outlet delay. Select patients with intractable constipation may benefit from surgery, although results are variable.

Cathartics↗
PubMed1998

Antroduodenal manometry findings in patients with slow-transit constipation.

BACKGROUND: The results of subtotal colectomy for slow-transit constipation are unpredictable. Abdominal pain, distension, and bloating often persist after operation. To ascertain whether patients with slow-transit constipation may have a generalized intestinal motor disorder, we studied the antroduodenal motor activity in 20 consecutive patients with slow-transit constipation. METHODS: All patients underwent symptom registration, whole-gut transit time, anorectal manometry, electromyography of the anal sphincter, the balloon expulsion test, and defecography to characterize their constipation. The motor activity of the the gastric antrum and the proximal small bowel was monitored for 5 h, using a pneumohydraulic water-perfused manometry system with six channels. RESULTS: Twelve patients (60%) had abnormal patterns of motor activity: abnormal propagation or configuration of phase III in 9 of 12 patients, bursts of non-propagated phasic activity in 8 of 12 patients, and sustained periods of intense phasic activity in 3 of 12 patients. One patient had generalized hypomotility with low-amplitude contractions. In addition, an abundance of so-called discrete clustered contractions was found in 6 of 20 patients. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of patients with slow-transit constipation have manometric findings that indicate a generalized motor disorder of the gut. The clinical significance of this finding is still unclear.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse: results of abdominal and perineal approaches.

This retrospective study reports the results of our 5-year experience in the diagnosis and treatment of rectal prolapse with fecal incontinence by the abdominal (laparotomy or laparoscopy) and perineal approaches. Twenty-five patients (group A; 22 women and 3 men; mean age 57.3 years; range 22-76 years) were operated on by the abdominal approach and ten (group B; 8 women and 2 men; mean age 68.9 years; range 58-84 years) by the perineal approach. All patients were evaluated by clinical examination, proctosigmoidoscopy, pancolonic transit time, dynamic defecography, anorectal manometry, and anal electromyography preparatory to surgery. In patients of group A, we performed an abdominal rectopexy in 19 cases (7 by laparoscopy) and in the remaining 6 cases, a sigmoid resection-rectopexy (3 of which were by laparoscopy). All patients of group B were treated by a perineal operation using Delorme's mucosectomy in 4 cases and Altemeier's rectosigmoidectomy with total perineoplasty in 6 cases. The mean follow-up was 38.8 months in group A and 25.7 months in group B. The postoperative complication rate was 8% (two cases) in group A, whereas no significant complications occurred in group B. Dyschezia and fecal incontinence improved significantly in both groups (P < 0.05 in group A and P < 0.005 in group B), whereas anoperineal pain was not significantly reduced. At 1-year follow-up, the recurrences rates were 8% in group A and 30% in group B. Rectopexy or resection-rectopexy proved to be a safe and effective procedure for external prolapse, without a discernible difference between the laparotomic and laparoscopic techniques. In selected cases, the perineal approach gives good results regarding fecal incontinence without complications, even if in these patients, the likelihood of recurrence is high.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Selection of constipated patients as subtotal colectomy candidates.

We evaluated 224 consecutive patients referred for severe constipation prospectively by strict criteria to determine their candidacy for subtotal colectomy. Eighteen patients had insufficient symptoms to warrant evaluation. Two hundred six patients had anorectal manometry and defecography, and 182 had colonic transit measurement. Forty-nine patients had normal or minimally abnormal studies. One-hundred twenty-nine patients had abnormalities such as outlet obstruction, mild colonic inertia, diffuse gut dysfunction, or combinations of factors not favoring subtotal colectomy. Twenty-eight patients had colonic inertia without outlet obstruction and with disabling symptoms; 19 of these patients underwent subtotal colectomy. Follow-up > or = 12 months was available in 14 patients from this group. Of these patients, 12 (86%) were clinically improved. Preoperative evaluation accurately predicted postoperative fecal incontinence and likely reduced postoperative constipation. Small-bowel obstruction occurred postoperatively in 4 patients (29%), and remains a major risk of subtotal colectomy even in carefully selected candidates.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Preserving the superior rectal artery in laparoscopic sigmoid resection for complete rectal prolapse.

Sigmoid resection is indicated in the treatment of complete rectal prolapse (CRP) in patients with prolonged colorectal transit time (CTT). Its use, however, has been limited because of fear of anastomotic leakage. This study challenges the current practice of dividing the mesorectum by prospectively evaluating the impact of sparing the superior rectal artery (SRA) on leak rates after laparoscopic sigmoid resection (LSR) for CRP. During a 30-month period, data on 33 selected patients with CRP were prospectively collected. Three patients were withdrawn from the analysis, as they had neither resection nor anastomosis. Twenty-nine women and 1 man (median age 55 range 21-83 years) underwent LSR with preservation of SRA for a median CRP of 8 (3-15) cm. There were 20 ASA I and 10 ASA II patients. Ten patients had undergone previous surgery. Four patients complained of dyschezia, whereas incontinence was present in 26 patients. Anal ultrasound showed isolated internal sphincter defects in 2 patients. Four young adults (21-32 years) had normal CTT, whereas 26 older patients had a median CTT of 5(4-6) days. Defecography demonstrated 10 enteroceles, two sigmoidoceles, and one rectal hernia through the levator ani muscle. Mortality was nil. Median operating room time was 180 (120-330) min, suprapubic incision length 5(3-7) cm, estimated blood loss 150 (50-500) mL, specimen length 20 (12-45) cm, solid food resumption 3(1-6) days, and length of stay 4.5(2-7) days. Thirty-day complications were not related to anastomosing and occurred in 20% of the patients. Median follow-up was 34.1 (18-48) months. One patient had a recurrence. Although the evidence provided by the present study suggests that sparing SRA has a favorable impact on anastomotic leak rates, these nonrandomized results need further evaluation. The division of the mesorectum at the rectosigmoid junction seems not necessary, and its sparing should therefore be considered as it may contain anastomotic leak rates.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Vaginal mullerian cyst presenting as a cystocele.

BACKGROUND: Vaginal cysts occur rarely, are usually discovered incidentally on examination, and can cause a variety of symptoms. CASE: This article discusses a 34-year-old para 2 female with a large anterior vaginal wall cyst that arose at 20 weeks' gestation and was originally diagnosed as a cystocele. The unusual timing of its occurrence and the characteristics of the anterior vaginal wall prompted ancillary testing and reexamination. CONCLUSION: The timing of onset and general characteristics of prolapse as well as defecography and magnetic resonance imaging can be used to aid the gynecologist in diagnosing vaginal cysts instead of the more common condition of vaginal prolapse.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

A three-year prospective assessment of rectocele repair using porcine xenograft.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate clinical outcome of rectocele repair using xenograft 3 years after surgery. METHODS: Twenty-three patients who completed evaluation preoperatively and 1 year after surgery were assessed at a 3-year follow-up. Clinical examination was performed preoperatively, and at the 1- and 3-year follow-ups, with the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system. Symptom assessment was performed with a validated bowel function questionnaire including questions on sexual function. RESULTS: There were no graft-related complications during the 3 years following surgery. Preoperatively, all patients had stage II prolapse of the posterior vaginal wall and a rectocele verified at defecography. At the 1-year follow-up, 11 of 29 patients (38%) had rectocele of stage II or more, and 4 patients were reoperated. At 3-year follow-up 7 of 23 patients (30%) had rectocele of stage II or more. When including the 4 early anatomical recurrences, a total of 11 of 27 patients (41%) had rectocele of stage II or more at 3-year follow-up. Preoperatively, all patients reported varying degrees of rectal emptying difficulties and symptoms of bowel dysfunction. There was a significant decrease in rectal emptying difficulties (P < .01), sense of incomplete evacuation (P < .01), need for manually assisted defecation (P < .05), and symptoms of pelvic heaviness (P < .001) at the 3-year follow-up compared with preoperatively. Cure of rectal emptying difficulties was reported by fewer than 50% of patients. There were no significant changes in anal incontinence scores or symptoms of sexual dysfunction at the 3-year follow-up compared with preoperatively. CONCLUSION: Rectocele repair using porcine dermal graft was associated with an unsatisfactory anatomical cure rate and persistent bowel-emptying difficulties in the majority of patients 3 years postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-3.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Outlet type constipation in Parkinson's disease: results of botulinum toxin treatment.

BACKGROUND: Constipation is one of the most common autonomic dysfunctions observed in Parkinson's disease. AIM: To investigate the efficacy of injections of botulinum toxin in improving rectal emptying in these patients. METHODS: Eighteen Parkinson's disease patients with outlet constipation were included in the study. The patients were treated with type A botulinum toxin, injected into two sites on either side of the puborectalis muscle under ultrasonographic guidance. RESULTS: Symptomatic improvement was noted in 10 patients, at 2 months evaluation. In these subjects, anorectal manometry demonstrated decreased tone during straining from 96.2 +/- 17.1 to 45.9 +/- 16.2 mmHg at 1 month evaluation (P = 0.00001) and to 56.1 +/- 10.7 mmHg at 2 months (P = 0.00001). Pressure during straining was lower than resting anal pressure at the same times in all patients. Defecography after the treatment showed improvement in anorectal angle during straining, which increased from 99.1 +/- 8.4 degrees to 121.7 +/- 12.7 degrees (P = 0.00001) at 2 months. CONCLUSIONS: Botulinum toxin injections may be a useful treatment for Parkinson's disease patients affected by outlet-obstruction constipation. The treatment is safe and simple. However, because the effects of the toxin wear off within 3 months of administration, repeated injections could be necessary to maintain the clinical improvement.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Constipation of anorectal outlet obstruction: pathophysiology, evaluation and management.

Constipation is a subjective symptom of various pathological conditions. Incidence of constipation fluctuates from 2 to 30% in the general population. Approximately 50% of constipated patients referred to tertiary care centers have obstructed defecation constipation. Constipation of obstructed defecation may be due to mechanical causes or functional disorders of the anorectal region. Mechanical causes are related to morphological abnormalities of the anorectum (megarectum, rectal prolapse, rectocele, enterocele, neoplasms, stenosis). Functional disorders are associated with neurological disorders and dysfunction of the pelvic floor muscles or anorectal muscles (anismus, descending perineum syndrome, Hirschsprung's disease). However, this type of constipation should be differentiated by colonic slow transit constipation which, if coexists, should be managed to a second time. Assessment of patients with severe constipation includes a good history, physical examination and specialized investigations (colonic transit time, anorectal manometry, rectal balloon expulsion test, defecography, electromyography), which contribute to the diagnosis and the differential diagnosis of the cause of the obstructed defecation. Thereby, constipated patients can be given appropriate treatment for their problem, which may be conservative (bulk agents, high-fiber diet or laxatives), biofeedback training or surgery.

Anus Diseases↗
PubMed2005

Clinical utility of diagnostic tests for constipation in adults: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Because symptoms alone do not identify pathophysiology or differentiate subgroups of constipation, diagnostic tests are generally recommended. However, their utility is not known. We performed a systematic review of diagnostic tests commonly used in constipation. METHODS: We searched the English literature using MEDLINE and PUBMED databases from 1966 to 2004 for studies in adults published as full manuscripts whose methodological quality was above a minimum score. RESULTS: No studies assessed the routine use of blood tests or abdominal x-ray. One retrospective endoscopic study showed that cancer and polyp detection rate was comparable to historical controls. Two studies of barium enema were unhelpful in diagnosis of constipation. Physiological studies showed differences in study population, methodology, and interpretation, and there was no gold standard. Ten colonic transit studies showed prevalence of 38-80% in support of slow transit constipation. Nine anorectal manometry studies showed prevalence of 20-75% for detecting dyssynergia. Nine studies of balloon expulsion showed impaired expulsion of 23-67%. Among 10 defecography studies, abnormalities were reported in 25-90% and dyssynergia in 13-37%. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence to support the use of blood tests, radiography, or endoscopy in the routine work up of patients with constipation without alarm features is lacking. Colonic transit, anorectal manometry, and balloon expulsion tests reveal physiologic abnormalities in many selected patients with constipation, but no single test adequately defines pathophysiology. Large, well-designed, prospective studies are required to examine the utility of these tests.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Experience with type A botulinum toxin for treatment of outlet-type constipation.

BACKGROUND: Puborectalis syndrome remains a therapeutic challenge for today's physicians. Traditional approaches include use of fiber, laxatives, enemas, biofeedback training, and surgery. These often were tried sequentially and had conflicting or even disappointing results. We investigated the efficacy of injections of botulinum toxin in improving rectal emptying in patients with defecatory disorders involving spastic pelvic-floor muscles. METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive patients with chronic outlet obstruction constipation resulting from puborectalis syndrome were included in the study. The patients were treated with 60 units of type A botulinum toxin, injected into two sites on either side of the puborectalis muscle under ultrasonographic guidance. RESULTS: At 2 months, evaluation inspection revealed a symptomatic improvement in 19 patients. Anorectal manometry demonstrated decreased tone during straining from 98 +/- 24 to 56 +/- 20 mmHg at a 1-month evaluation (p < 0.01) and 56 +/- 29 mmHg at a 2-month follow-up (p < 0.01). Pressure during straining was lower than resting anal pressure at the same time in all patients. Defecography after the treatment showed improvement in anorectal angle during straining, which increased from 98 +/- 9 degrees to 121 +/- 15 degrees (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Botulinum toxin injections should be considered as a simple therapeutic approach in patients with obstructed defecation. The treatment is safe and effective, especially with the use of the ultrasonographic guidance that accounts for a more precise injection and consequently better long-term results. Otherwise, given the limited effect of the toxin, repeated injections may be necessary to maintain the clinical improvement.

Botulinum Toxins, Type A↗
PubMed2002

Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor performed with patient sitting in an open-magnet unit versus with patient supine in a closed-magnet unit.

PURPOSE: To compare open-magnet magnetic resonance (MR) imaging performed with the patient sitting with dynamic closed-magnet MR imaging of the pelvic floor performed with the patient supine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients underwent dynamic 1.5-T closed-magnet pelvic floor MR imaging while in the supine position. Midsagittal T2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo and T1-weighted multiphase spoiled gradient-recalled-echo (SPGR) MR images were obtained before and after rectal contrast agent administration, respectively, with the patient at rest, straining, and maximally contracting the sphincter. Subsequently, the patient was transferred to an open 0.5-T system. Midsagittal multiphase T1-weighted SPGR MR images were then obtained every 2 seconds with the patient sitting while at rest, maximally contracting the sphincter, straining, and defecating. Images were analyzed with regard to presence of enteroceles, anterior rectoceles, intussusceptions, rectal descents, bladder descents, and vaginal vault descents. RESULTS: All intussusceptions were missed at supine MR imaging. With sitting MR imaging as the reference standard, the sensitivity of supine MR imaging was 79% for depiction of bladder descents. When MR findings were graded and clinically irrelevant MR findings were excluded, sensitivity increased to 100% for depiction of bladder descents and anterior rectoceles and to 96% for depiction of rectal descents. CONCLUSION: Dynamic supine MR imaging performed with a closed-configuration unit before and after rectal contrast agent administration appears to be an alternative to sitting MR defecography performed with an open-configuration unit for diagnosis of clinically relevant pelvic floor abnormalities.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Anorectal function: defecographic measurement in asymptomatic subjects.

A study of anorectal function during fluoroscopically monitored defecation was conducted in 32 asymptomatic subjects. Two observers independently measured various parameters on defecograms and reviewed video recordings during the subjects' squeezing, rest, and straining. There was a wide range of measurements for the anorectal angle, the position of the anorectal junction, perineal motility, and anal canal width. Interobserver variation of these measurements was large. In 17 subjects, both observers agreed that rectal emptying was incomplete. In 10 patients, there was agreement on the presence of rectal wall changes such as intussusception, rectocele, and mucosal prolapse. Defecographic measurements should be interpreted with caution and should not be used as the only criteria for treatment. Anatomic changes of the anorectal region during straining at defecation do not necessarily cause symptoms but may be a precursor of clinical disorders. Defecography is useful in the detection of these abnormalities.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Laparotomic vs. laparoscopic rectopexy in complete rectal prolapse.

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the functional and clinical results of laparotomic and laparoscopic rectopexy in 2 homogeneous groups of patients with complete rectal prolapse and fecal incontinence. METHODS: Between January 1989 and December 1997, twenty-three patients underwent abdominal rectopexy. Thirteen patients (group A, 12 females and 1 male, mean age 57.3, range 22-76 years), and 10 patients (group B, 10 females, mean age 52.3, range 26-70 years) were submitted respectively to either Wells laparotomic or laparoscopic rectopexy by the same surgical team using the same surgical technique and materials. Before the operation a detailed clinical history was collected, and the patients were studied by inspection and digital examination of the anorectum, proctosigmoidoscopy, pancolonic transit time, dynamic defecography, anorectal manometry and anal electromyography. After the operation all patients underwent perineal physiotherapy, external electric stimulation, and perineal biofeedback. Mean follow-up was 37.1 (range 6-90) months in group A and 25.7 (range 6-49) months in group B. Values were compared by chi(2), Mann-Whitney U, and Wilcoxon tests as appropriate. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. RESULTS: In both groups dyschezia and fecal incontinence improved significantly (p < 0.05) after the operation. The basal pressure of the anal sphincter, squeezing pressure and rectoanal reflex improved without significance, and anal-perineal pain was not significantly reduced. In group B the postoperative hospital stay was lower than in group A, with a reduction in costs. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic Wells rectopexy has the same clinical and functional results as laparotomic rectopexy, but with a shorter postoperative hospital stay and lower costs.

Adult↗