Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Basiliximab”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Biliary stricture secondary to donor B-cell lymphoma after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) lead to considerable morbidity and occasional mortality after surgery. Bile duct strictures secondary to localized lymphoproliferative disorder of the porta hepatis is rare, with only 12 cases reported in the English literature. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder develops in up to 9% of liver allograft recipients. We describe 2 adult patients who developed Epstein-Barr virus-associated localized B-cell lymphoma of donor-tissue origin confined to the porta hepatis 3 and 5 months after OLT. Both patients were administered cyclosporine (CyA) and prednisone as primary immunosuppression. One patient was administered basiliximab as induction therapy. Neither patient had CyA trough levels greater than 250 ng/mL. Both patients were treated with a hepatojejunostomy, 75% reduction in immunosuppression therapy, and acyclovir. One patient had complete involution of the tumor, and the second patient had an 80% reduction of the tumor at the 2-year follow-up visit. This report illustrates the need to consider localized lymphoma post-OLT as a cause of obstructive jaundice even within the first 6 months after surgery. Aggressive reduction of immunosuppression in conjunction with acyclovir remains a highly effective therapy.

Acyclovir↗
PubMed2001

Immunosuppressive drugs and novel strategies to prevent acute and chronic allograft rejection.

Maintenance immunosuppression for lung transplantation includes cyclosporine or tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine, and prednisone. Some centers rely on induction agents including OKT3 (murine monoclonal antibody, OKT3), ATG (antithymocyte globulin), or thymoglobulin. In addition, a number of new agents including sirolimus (SRL) and the interleukin (IL)-2 receptor antagonists, daclizumab and basiliximab, have become available. Management of chronic rejection typically consists of augmented immunosuppression using many of the standard agents, and other potent agents such as methotrexate or cytoxan or more novel strategies including photopheresis, radiation, and total lymphoid irradiation (TLI).

Journal Article↗
PubMed2005

Costimulation blockade with belatacept in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Renal transplantation is the standard of care for patients with end-stage renal disease. Although maintenance immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors yields excellent one-year survival, it is associated over the long term with high rates of death and graft loss, owing in part to the adverse renal, cardiovascular, and metabolic effects of these agents. The use of potentially less toxic agents, such as belatacept, a selective blocker of T-cell activation, may improve outcomes. METHODS: We randomly assigned renal-transplant recipients to receive an intensive or a less-intensive regimen of belatacept or cyclosporine. All patients received induction therapy with basiliximab, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. The primary objective was to demonstrate the noninferiority of belatacept over cyclosporine in the incidence of acute rejection at six months (with an upper bound of the 95 percent confidence interval around the treatment difference of less than 20 percent). RESULTS: At six months, the incidence of acute rejection was similar among the groups: 7 percent for intensive belatacept, 6 percent for less-intensive belatacept, and 8 percent for cyclosporine. At 12 months, the glomerular filtration rate was significantly higher with both intensive and less-intensive belatacept than it was with cyclosporine (66.3, 62.1, and 53.5 ml per minute per 1.73 m2, respectively), and chronic allograft nephropathy was less common with both regimens of belatacept than with cyclosporine (29 percent, 20 percent, and 44 percent, respectively). Lipid levels and blood-pressure values were similar or slightly lower in the belatacept groups, despite the greater use of lipid-lowering and antihypertensive medications in the cyclosporine group. CONCLUSIONS: Belatacept, an investigational selective costimulation blocker, did not appear to be inferior to cyclosporine as a means of preventing acute rejection after renal transplantation. Belatacept may preserve the glomerular filtration rate and reduce the rate of chronic allograft nephropathy.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2000

Drug therapy for acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis.

The mechanisms of many immunosuppressive drugs have been defined, allowing for a rational approach to the use of these agents in GVHD prophylaxis. In addition to standard drugs such as methotrexate, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and glucocorticoids, new agents-mycophenolate mofetil, tresperimus, rapamycin, basiliximab, and daclizumab-are now part of the immunosuppressive armamentarium. Improved understanding of tolerance has resulted in new approaches to prevention of GVHD. Anti-CD40L, CTLA-4-Ig, tresperimus, and rapamycin are agents that are being explored in this area and have shown impressive results in animal models. Currently, the standard therapy for acute GVHD prophylaxis in matched sibling transplants remains cyclosporine and methotrexate. Lower dose methotrexate, particularly in combination with tacrolimus, has shown good results in single arm studies with low toxicity, but this has not been tested in a randomized study. For unrelated donor transplants there is less GVHD when tacrolimus, rather than cyclosporine, is combined with methotrexate; there seems little reason to use cyclosporine in this setting. GVHD is still the major barrier to more widespread use of unrelated donor transplants and improved regimens are needed. In vivo T-cell depletion using Campath-1 or ATG is being used in high-risk patients. Data on its efficacy are so far anecdotal. Due to the variation in grading of GVHD between centers, randomized studies are needed to quantify the relative merits of different regimens, and participation in such studies is encouraged.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2005

Limitations of C2 monitoring in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Recent developments have proposed the cyclosporin (CsA) concentration at 2 h post-dose (C(2)) as the best single time-point predictor of the extent of CsA exposure and as the optimal basis for monitoring immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplant patients. The present study sought to validate the cornerstones of the current concept of C(2) monitoring. METHODS: We assessed the predictive value, dose proportionality and intrapatient variability of C(2) levels in 41 de novo renal transplant recipients treated with CsA microemulsion, steroids, mycophenolate sodium and basiliximab. RESULTS: Patients with rejection and patients with CsA nephrotoxicity had lower C(2) (P = NS) and absorption (P<0.05 for toxicity), while C(0) did not show any significant difference. Receiver operating characteristic analysis did not detect discriminative C(2) values as a predictor of rejection or toxicity. In a substantial number of patients (29%) we observed poor and/or slow absorption, with C(0) >300 ng/ml and C(2) levels <800 ng/ml during the first month and a high rate of complications in these patients (18% rejection, 64% toxicity). Absorption increased over the first month post-transplant. Analysis of dose changes indicated that C(2) levels are not dose-proportional. Intrapatient variability of C(2) was as high as that of C(0). CONCLUSIONS: C(2) levels do not predict rejection or toxicity. C(2) monitoring alone does not detect toxicity in poor and/or slow absorbers, who constitute a significant proportion of patients. Changes in absorption over time, high intrapatient variability and lack of dose proportionality constitute further limitations of the C(2) monitoring concept in the early post-transplant phase.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Steroid-free immunosuppression after renal transplantation-long-term experience from a single centre.

BACKGROUND: A steroid-free immunosuppressive protocol may improve the general well-being of patients, but long-term renal graft survival has been a concern. METHODS: In a retrospective clinical study, 329 consecutive transplantations with renal grafts at our centre during the period 1995-2004, were followed for up to 9.3 years. Patients mainly received steroid-free immunosuppression with an initial induction with antithymocyte globulin or basiliximab and maintenance therapy with ciclosporin and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Steroids were given after rejection, or if the physician judged it necessary, for instance because of primary kidney disease or when calcineurin inhibitor toxicity was suspected. RESULTS: About 71% of the patients did not take steroids at all. Nevertheless, graft survival rates at 1, 5 and 7 years were 95, 77 and 72% for all grafts, including 27% living donor transplants and 27% second or subsequent grafts. Ten patients (3.2%) died with functioning grafts. Within the first year of transplantation there were 69 acute rejections in 63 patients (19%). Four cases (1.3%) of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) occurred with one graft loss and no deaths. Owing to a high PTLD rate in a previous patient cohort, total immunosuppression was lessened after 1998. CONCLUSIONS: Steroid avoidance is possible with good results with respect to acute rejection and long-term graft survival. After introducing MMF, largely avoiding muromonab-CD3 mouse raised monoclonal antibody against CD (OKT3), and reducing doses of calcineurin inhibitor, the rates of PTLD did not differ from what is usually found. For the present, induction and use of MMF, together with a calcineurin inhibitor, is probably to be preferred.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy after liver transplantation successfully treated with plasmapheresis.

Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy (NFD) is a recently described cutaneous fibrosing disorder associated with renal dysfunction. It appears similar to scleromyxedema but with some notable exceptions, including the lack of involvement of the face and absence of plasma cells on histology, systemic involvement, and paraproteinemia. Patients can present with thickened or edematous skin with indurated papules and plaques involving the extremities and the trunk. We report the first three cases of NFD after liver transplantation successfully treated with plasmapheresis. Two patients underwent liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus-induced cirrhosis and one for hepatitis B virus-induced cirrhosis. All the patients had encephalopathy, refractory ascites, and malnutrition prior to transplantation. Like those patients with NFD, all three of our patients had renal dysfunction and required hemodialysis before and after transplantation. Two were not dependent on dialysis at the time of diagnosis, however. These patients had excellent liver allograft function, but the other patient had allograft failure secondary to recurrent hepatitis C. Immunosuppression therapy consisted of basiliximab, mycophenolate mofetil, calcineurin inhibitor, and prednisone. The patients developed "woody" skin induration of the distal extremities, erythematous papules, and contractures at 1, 2, and 120 months after transplantation. Skin biopsies resembled NFD. No paraproteinemia was evident. One to three 5-day courses of plasmapheresis resulted in moderate to marked clinical improvement. The improvement of the kidney function in two of our patients did not appear to correlate with that of the skin disorder, because the kidney function was improving at the time the diagnosis of NFD was made. In conclusion, we report the first three cases of NFD after liver transplantation. Plasmapheresis was moderately successful in resolving the skin-indurated papules, severe skin induration, and associated joint contractures. Preliminary studies (unpublished data) show that decreasing plasma levels of transforming growth factor-beta1 after plasmapheresis appear to correlate with the amelioration of this clinical condition.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Intestinal transplantation before and after the introduction of sirolimus.

INTRODUCTION: Small bowel transplantation has been limited by high rates of rejection and graft loss. In June 2000, we began using sirolimus, an immunosuppression agent with proven efficacy in kidney transplantation. We reviewed results among intestinal transplant recipients before and after the introduction of sirolimus. METHODS: Thirty-one intestinal transplants were performed in 29 patients at our center between July 1998 and April 2001. All patients were followed for at least 30 days posttransplant. In the first 19 transplants (group 1), patients received tacrolimus, steroids, and antibody induction therapy (either daclizumab or OKT3). In the next 12 consecutive transplants (group 2), patients received tacrolimus, steroids, basiliximab, and sirolimus. RESULTS: Eighteen children (7 males and 11 females, mean age 2.1+/-2.2 years) and 11 adults (9 males and 2 females, mean age 38.1+/-12.4 years) underwent transplantation. All patients survived transplantation. The overall reoperation rate was 1.7 procedures per patient in group 1 and 1.1 procedures per patient in group 2. The most common indications were abscess (n=7), planned second look (n=7), leaks/fistulas (n=6), dehiscence (n=6), obstruction (n=4), ischemic bowel (n=3), perforations (n=3), stomal complications (n=3), and graft removal (n=3). The incidence of biopsy-proven rejection in the first 30 days was 73.7% in group 1 and 16.7% in group 2 (P<0.002). Sirolimus was temporarily held or discontinued in 66.7% of patients. Actuarial 1-year graft survival was 91.7% with sirolimus and 57.9% without sirolimus (P<0.04). Actuarial 1-year patient survival was 91.7% with sirolimus and 79% without sirolimus (P=0.12). CONCLUSIONS: An immunosuppressive regimen that includes sirolimus has improved graft survival. Furthermore, this regimen has significantly decreased the incidence of early rejection and has eliminated early graft loss caused by fulminant rejection.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Addition of sirolimus to cyclosporine delays the recovery from delayed graft function but does not affect 1-year graft function.

Delayed graft function (DGF) has long been identified as one of the main correlates of poor graft survival in cadaveric renal transplantation, but the factors that affect its onset and duration are not fully elucidated. The impact of two immunosuppressive protocols on the incidence and length of DGF among kidney transplant recipients of a suboptimal organ was evaluated. Patients were randomly treated with corticosteroids (CS); low-dose cyclosporine (CsA) and sirolimus (SRL; group 1; n = 42); or CS, full-dose CsA, and mycophenolate mofetil (group 2; n = 48). All recipients received immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab. After 3 mo, group 1 discontinued CsA and continued with SRL, whereas group 2 continued the same treatment. The incidence of DGF was similar in the two groups (group 1 = 52.4%; group 2 = 58.3%), whereas its duration was significantly higher in the group 1 (19.0 +/- 6.0 versus 10.3 +/- 3.2 d; P = 0.001). Both groups showed 100% actuarial graft and patient survival at 1-yr. Among DGF patients, serum creatinine (sCr) at discharge was significantly worse in group 1 (sCr, 3.0 +/- 1.0 versus 1.5 +/- 0.2 mg/dl; calculated creatinine clearance, 31.2 +/- 9.3 versus 61.1 +/- 10 ml/min; P = 0.001). During the first year, the former group displayed a significant improvement of graft function, such that at 1-yr, no difference could be measured between groups (sCr, 1.8 +/- 0.5 versus 1.7 +/- 0.4 mg/dl; calculated creatinine clearance, 51.5 +/- 10.2 versus 53.3 +/- 9.4 ml/min). In conclusion, in de novo renal transplanted patients, the administration of SRL, in combination with low-dose CsA, is associated with a delayed recovery from DGF but does not worsen 1-yr graft function.

Cyclosporine↗
PubMed2005

Update in medical therapy of ulcerative colitis: newer concepts and therapies.

Recent advances in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis recognize the interface of genetic susceptibility, environmental factors (eg, gut microflora), and an altered host's immune response. The meteoric evolution of new therapies designed to address these pathogenetic factors may lead to confusing and often confounding treatment programs. This review is designed to assist the practitioner when in [corrected] incorporating new or novel therapies into a treatment program. These decisions are based on new clinical trial data and the experience of seasoned gastroenterologists with established remedies. NEWER CONCEPTS AND THERAPIES IN UC 5-ADA-- 1. Remains drug of choice for induction and maintenance of remission in mild to moderate IC.1,2 2. Rare but increased incidence of renal disease exists but benefits outweigh risks.18-20 3. Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer in UC is promising and may be related to higher dose and a lessened degree of inflammation.29-36 4. Bioequivalence of all USA 5-ASA is established. Choice of a 5-ASA preparation is not dependent on superiority of a particular mesalamine.3 Phosphodiesterase Inhibitor (OPC-6525)37: preliminary data promising Immunomodulators 6MP/AZA 1. long-term effect not waning51 2. concerns over lymphoma voiced but overall benefits outweigh risks64-70 3. 6MP metabolites measurements of increasing use52-56 Cyclosporine experience continues but serious adverse events remains.105-114 Biologics Infliximab--somewhat disappointing in CUC, awaiting RCT87-92 Basiliximab--useful as "steroid sensitizer" in previously steroid resistant patients118-120 Visilizumab--promising as alternative to cyclosporin in server U.C.115-117 Apheresis--and emerging "non-drug" treatment alternative121-135 Probiotics--Useful in pouchitis and some mild to moderate U.C.94-98, 154 ISIS topical therapy useful in early pilot study (pouchitis)151 Budesonide (pouchitis)147 Antibiotics (pouchitis)140-146 [corrected]

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMed2004

Interleukin 2 receptor antagonists for renal transplant recipients: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Interleukin 2 receptor antagonists (IL-2Ra) are increasingly used to treat renal transplant recipients. This study aims to systematically identify and summarize the effects of using IL-2Ra as induction immunosuppression, as an addition to standard therapy, or as an alternative to other antibody therapy. METHODS: Databases, reference lists, and abstracts of conference proceedings were searched extensively to identify relevant randomized controlled trials in all languages. Data were synthesized using the random effects model. Results are expressed as relative risk (RR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: A total of 117 reports from 38 trials involving 4,893 participants were included. When IL-2Ra were compared with placebo (17 trials; 2,786 patients), graft loss was not significantly different at 1 year (14 trials: RR 0.84; CI 0.64-1.10) or 3 years (4 trials: RR 1.08; CI 0.71-1.64). Acute rejection was significantly reduced at 6 months (12 trials: RR 0.66; CI 0.59-0.74) and at 1 year (10 trials: RR 0.67; CI 0.60-0.75). At 1 year, cytomegalovirus infection (7 trials: RR 0.82; CI 0.65-1.03) and malignancy (9 trials: RR 0.67; CI 0.33-1.36) were not significantly different. When IL-2Ra were compared with other antibody therapy, no significant differences in treatment effects were demonstrated, but IL-2Ra had significantly fewer side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Given a 40% risk of rejection, seven patients would need treatment with IL-2Ra in addition to standard therapy, to prevent one patient from undergoing rejection, with no definite improvement in graft or patient survival. There is no apparent difference between basiliximab and daclizumab.

Graft Survival↗
PubMed2004

Association of graft neutrophil sequestration with delayed graft function in clinical renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The authors studied the impact of neutrophil activation, detected in experimental models, on reperfusion injury in clinical renal transplantation. METHODS: Forty-five patients from a larger trial comparing three immunosuppressive protocols were recruited: perioperative antithymocyte globulin (ATG) with low initial cyclosporine A (CsA) triple therapy (group A, n=15); two-dose basiliximab with low initial CsA triple therapy (group B, n=16); and conventional triple therapy (group C, n=14). Blood samples were obtained preoperatively, before reperfusion, and at 1 and 5 min after reperfusion. During reperfusion, samples were collected from the iliac artery and the graft vein for calculation of transrenal differences (Delta) of study parameters. Leukocyte differential counts, plasma lactoferrin concentration, and neutrophil CD11b and L-selectin expressions were assessed. Graft blood flow was measured at 2 and 30 min after reperfusion. RESULTS: ATG induced neutrophil activation already before reperfusion. Thus, group A was excluded, but groups B and C were pooled for analysis of reperfusion-induced neutrophil activation. At 1 min after reperfusion, lactoferrin concentration was higher in graft vein than iliac artery, yielding Delta=15 microg/L (P<0.05). Concomitantly, Delta neutrophil count correlated with both Delta L-selectin expression (R=0.49, P=0.012) and graft blood flow at 2 min (R=0.51, P=0.007). At 5 min after reperfusion, 0.17 (-1.0-0.24)x10 cells/L neutrophils were sequestered in the graft (P<0.001). This sequestration correlated with graft blood flow at 30 min (R=0.53, P=0.005) and was stronger in patients with delayed graft function (DGF) (Delta = -0.38 [-1.45 to -0.2]) than those without (Delta = -0.12 [-0.41-0.24], P<0.001). In multiple regression analysis, sequestration was the most important parameter associated with DGF. CONCLUSIONS: Neutrophils are activated and sequestered in the reperfused graft during clinical renal transplantation. Neutrophil sequestration is a powerful independent factor explaining the incidence of DGF.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Weak humoral posttransplant alloresponse after a well-HLA-matched cadaveric kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Screening of donor-specific antibodies or alloantibodies after kidney transplantation has not been performed routinely. The aim of this study was to evaluate the humoral antidonor and alloresponse of immunologically low-risk recipients of cadaveric renal allografts during the first posttransplant year. METHODS: Alloresponse against the donor was analyzed by means of T-cell immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM and B cell IgG flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) tests with sera from days 0, 21, 90, and 365 posttransplant. In addition, panel reactive anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and class II antibodies (PRA I and PRA II) were analyzed using flow cytometric methods. The recipients were treated either with a low initial cyclosporine regimen with single-bolus antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or basiliximab induction or conventional cyclosporine triple therapy. RESULTS: No significant posttransplant anti-HLA class I or class II sensitization was found in the recipients as a whole. Recipients receiving a single-bolus ATG showed significantly higher proportion of PRA I positivity in the day 21 sample compared with the other groups. Flow cytometric donor-specific T- and B-cell IgG alloresponses remained low, but the proportion of T-cell IgM crossmatch-positive recipients increased during the study. Positive T-cell IgM FCXM was found to be associated with acute rejection episodes and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections. CONCLUSIONS: In immunologically low-risk kidney-graft recipients, positive T-cell IgM FCXM at transplantation was found to be a risk factor for rejection episodes. Conversion of T-cell IgM FCXM to positive was found to be associated with CMV infections.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Successful rescue therapy with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin for acute humoral renal transplant rejection.

Plasmapheresis (PP) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) remove donor-specific antibodies, a cause of acute humoral rejection (AHR). We describe the use of PP and IVIg as rescue therapy for AHR. The records of 143 renal transplants performed between October 1, 2000 and April 1, 2002 were reviewed. Patients who underwent PP and IVIg therapy for AHR were identified. The data reviewed included age, sex, source of transplant, number of human leukocyte antigen mismatches, transplant number, number of PP and IVIg treatments, dose of IVIg, time of AHR, serum creatinine (SCr) level at AHR, SCr level after PP and IVIg at 3 months, days to achieve 30% decline in SCr, and graft survival. Immunosuppression included basiliximab induction, tacrolimus, and prednisone (+/- sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil [CellCept, Roche Pharmaceutical, Nutley, NJ]). PP was followed by IVIg infusion. Nine patients were treated for AHR with PP and IVIg. All nine patients demonstrated biopsy-proven AHR. One graft was lost. Mean 3-month and 1-year SCr levels were 1.9 and 1.8, respectively, in the remaining eight patients. AHR in renal transplantation can be effectively treated with PP and IVIg.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Everolimus and reduced-exposure cyclosporine in de novo renal-transplant recipients: a three-year phase II, randomized, multicenter, open-label study.

BACKGROUND: Everolimus and cyclosporine (CsA) exhibit synergistic immunosuppressive activity when used in combination. We explored the use of everolimus with a CsA-sparing strategy in de novo renal-transplant recipients. METHODS: A phase II, randomized, open-label 3-year study was performed in 111 patients to compare the efficacy and tolerability of everolimus (3 mg/day) in combination with basiliximab, steroids, and either full-dose Neoral (FDN) or reduced-dose Neoral (RDN) (CsA trough levels 125-250 ng/mL and 50-100 ng/mL, respectively). Efficacy failure (biopsy-proven acute rejection, death, graft loss, or loss to follow-up), safety, and renal function were evaluated at 6, 12, and 36 months. A protocol amendment allowed further reduction of CsA exposure after 12 months. RESULTS: Efficacy failure was significantly higher in FDN than in the RDN group at 6 (15.1% vs. 3.4%; P=0.046), 12 (28.3% vs. 8.6%; P=0.012), and 36 (35.8% vs. 17.2%; P=0.032) months. Mean creatinine clearance was higher in the RDN group at 6 (59.7 mL/min vs. 51.1 mL/min; P=0.009), 12 (60.9 mL/min vs. 53.5 mL/min; P=0.007), and 36 (56.6 mL/min vs. 51.7 mL/min; P=0.436) months. Discontinuations and serious adverse events were more frequent in the FDN group. Reduction of CsA exposure for 6 months during the amendment improved renal function in the FDN group. CONCLUSIONS: In de novo renal-transplant recipients, the regimen of everolimus plus RDN was well tolerated, with low efficacy failure and better renal function in comparison with everolimus plus FDN.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

The effect of 2-gram versus 1-gram concentration controlled mycophenolate mofetil on renal transplant outcomes using sirolimus-based calcineurin inhibitor drug-free immunosuppression.

BACKGROUND: We performed a sequential study to determine the efficacy and side effects of low-dose (1 g) mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in a CNI drug avoidance regimen including sirolimus/steroids. METHODS: A total of 260 kidney-only recipients were given basiliximab (232) or thymoglobulin (28) induction, and sirolimus/steroids. In addition, 160 recipients were begun on standard MMF 1 g twice daily (2-g group), while 100 recipients were begun on low-dose MMF 500 mg twice daily (1-g group). The 1-g recipients were concentration controlled to keep mycophenolic acid (MPA) C0 levels at 1.8-4 microg/ml. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in demographics between the groups. At 6 months there were no significant differences between the 2-g and 1-g MMF groups in patient survival (96.8% vs. 96%), graft survival (92.5% vs. 95%), biopsy-confirmed and treated acute rejection (8.8% vs. 13%), or mean creatinine mg/dL (1.41+/-0.52 vs. 1.47+/-0.67), respectively. Mean MPA C0 levels microg/ml were (4.7 vs. 2.3) at 1 month, (4.1 vs. 3.1) at 3 months, and (3.9 vs. 2.4) at 6 months. There were no significant differences at 1, 3, or 6 months in mean WBC, HgB, or platelets, or wound complications. There were significant reductions in the number of patients reporting nausea-vomiting-dyspepsia (20.6% vs. 8%, P=0.007), diarrhea (34.3% vs. 20%, P=0.01), and abdominal pains (10.6% vs. 4%, P=0.05), between the 2-g and 1-g MMF groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of concentration-controlled 1-g MMF results in comparable transplant outcomes with less GI toxicity during the first 6 months posttransplant in a CNI drug-free sirolimus based immunosuppressive regimen.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

T-lymphocyte alloresponses of Campath-1H-treated kidney transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant patients given Campath-1H (Alemtuzumab) immunodepletion therapy and long-term rapamycin monotherapy have excellent graft survival and function at three years. As an initial step in understanding the characteristics of repopulated T lymphocytes in these patients, we performed several assays to assess alloreactivity. METHODS: We measured T-cell responses using CFSE-labeled recipient lymphocytes in a direct one-way MLR, and also analyzed the kinetics of expression of IFN-gamma. We examined the T-cell responses of Campath-treated transplant patients on monotherapy versus those treated with anti-CD25 (Basiliximab) induction therapy and maintenance immunosuppression consisting of cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. RESULTS: On average, proliferative responses to donor antigen were equal between Campath and control groups. However, the Campath group displayed a greater response to third party compared to donor antigen (CD3 P = 0.04, CD4 P = 0.07, CD8 P < 0.01), whereas the control group did not display a greater response to third party (CD3 P = 0.69, CD4 P = 0.72, CD8 P = 0.60). Interestingly, more Campath patients (4 of 15) than control patients (0 of 8) displayed donor specific unresponsiveness as gauged by IFN-gamma expression and T-cell proliferation (P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: These studies suggest that Campath-1H in conjunction with rapamycin monotherapy retains intact immune responses to third party alloantigen, yet may promote hyporesponsiveness to donor antigen.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Review article: the management of mild to severe acute ulcerative colitis.

The goals for the management of acute ulcerative colitis are the objective evaluation of disease activity, induction of remission, prevention of relapse and treatment of complications. Clinical practice should be guided by simple activity indices, as it is easy to underestimate severity. For the induction of remission, topical treatment with mesalazine (mesalamine) is appropriate initial therapy for distal disease but, if symptoms persist for over a fortnight, decisive treatment is usually appreciated by the patient. For mild to moderate disease, corticosteroids have been the mainstay in Europe, although high-dose aminosalicylates (such as Pentasa, 4 g orally daily and 1 g rectally) are an alternative for symptoms not interfering with daily activity. Novel therapeutic approaches in ulcerative colitis have lagged behind those used for Crohn's disease, but several (epidermal growth factor, RDP 58, basiliximab, leucocytapheresis) are on the horizon. Severe colitis, defined as a bloody stool frequency of more than six per day with any one of tachycardia (pulse > 90 beats/min), temperature (> 37.8 degrees C), anaemia (haemoglobin < 10.5 g/dL) or raised erythrocyte sedimentation rate (> 30 mm/h), is an indication for intensive intravenous treatment. National UK figures indicate that 30% of ulcerative colitis cases progress to colectomy, and objective criteria for predicting the need for colectomy have been validated. The timing of colectomy is the most important decision that a physician is called upon to make, in conjunction with the patient and surgical colleagues. For the maintenance of remission, aminosalicylates continue to be first-line therapy, although the choice of 5-aminosalicylate appears to be influenced as much by geography as by theoretical considerations. Steroids have no place in the maintenance of remission. Indications for azathioprine include patients after a severe relapse of ulcerative colitis, those with early relapse after steroids (dose of < 15 mg/day, or within 6 weeks of stopping) and those needing a second course of steroids within a year. Therapeutic decisions should have a strategy, aimed at navigating the patient around relapses and through to sustained remission. Good management depends on clinical skills, compassion and care of the individual, in addition to pharmaceuticals.

Acute Disease↗