Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “BODY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19Linked to original sources

Parturition body size and body protein loss during lactation influence performance during lactation and ovarian function at weaning in first-parity sows.

We investigated the effect of body protein mass at parturition and different degrees of body protein loss in lactation on sow performance. In a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement, 77 Genex gilts were fed to achieve either a standard or high body mass at parturition and to lose either a moderate (MPL) or high (HPL) amount of protein in lactation. Pregnant gilts were fed either 24.4 MJ of ME, 266 g of CP, and 11 g of lysine/d or 34.0 MJ of ME, 436 g of CP, and 20 g of lysine/d resulting in divergent (P < 0.01) live weights (165 vs. 193 kg) and calculated protein masses (24.3 vs. 30.0 kg) and slightly different backfat depths (20.0 vs. 22.8 mm; P < 0.05) at parturition. Diets fed during lactation were formulated to deliver 731 g of CP and 37 g of lysine/d or 416 g of CP and 22 g of lysine/d to induce differential body protein mobilization. Sows were slaughtered at weaning (d 26), and the weight of the organs and the lean, fat, and bone in five primal cuts was measured. The external diameter of the eight largest follicles on each ovary was recorded, and the follicular fluid from these follicles was collected, weighed, and analyzed for estradiol. Losses in lactational live weight (26 vs. 20 kg; P < 0.01) and calculated protein mass (17.8 vs. 10.7%; P < 0.001) were greater, and the carcass lean mass at weaning was 10% lighter (P < 0.05) in HPL sows. Backfat (5.1 +/- 0.8 mm; P = 0.29) and calculated fat mass (25.8 +/- 1.5%; P = 0.84) losses did not differ between treatments. Both sow body mass (P < 0.05) and lactation protein loss (P < 0.01) affected litter growth rate. Litter growth rate decreased (P < 0.05) at the end of lactation in HPL sows once these sows had lost 10 to 12% of their calculated protein mass. Ovarian follicular development was most advanced in high body mass sows that lost the least protein; these sows had the heaviest (P < 0.05) uterine weight and highest (P < 0.05) follicular fluid estradiol concentration. Follicular development was least advanced in standard body mass sows that lost the most protein. These sows had the lowest (P < 0.05) muscle:bone ratio at weaning and likely lost the largest proportion of their muscle mass compared with the other treatments. In conclusion, ovarian function at weaning and litter performance was higher in high body mass sows and in sows that lost the least protein in lactation, suggesting that a larger lean mass may delay the onset of a decrease in performance in sows that lose protein in lactation.

Adipose Tissue↗

Ideal body weight estimated from the body mass index with the lowest morbidity.

The ideal body weight (kg) of each individual can be calculated by the following formula: ideal body mass index x the height (m)2, since body mass index is expressed by the body weight in kilogram divided by the height squared in meters. We investigated an ideal body mass index with respect to morbidity in 4565 Japanese men and women aged 30-59 years. Ten medical problems served as indices of morbidity: lung disease, heart disease, upper gastrointestinal disease, hypertension, renal disease, liver disease, hyperlipidemia, hyperuricemia, diabetes mellitus and anemia. The value of body mass index associated with the lowest morbidity was 22.2 kg/m2 in men and 21.9 kg/m2 in women, according to the quadratic regression curves relating body mass index to morbidity. From these findings, we propose that the ideal body weight is 22 x height (m)2. Our recommendations apply to the age group studied, namely 30-59 years.

Adult↗

Recall of body weight and body size estimation in women enrolled in the breast cancer detection and demonstration project (BCDDP).

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and pictorial representations of body size in women from young adulthood to late mid-life. DESIGN: Retrospective, descriptive study of BMI and pictorial estimation of body size. SUBJECTS: 5,807 women age 33-77 years enrolled in the National Cancer Institute's and American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Detection and Demonstration Project (BCDDP). MEASUREMENTS: Body weight and height were measured in 1973. In 1977, a subset of the cohort recalled their usual height and weight at 10 y intervals starting at age 20. In 1987, subjects reported their usual and current weight and selected one of nine pictorials best representing their body size at ages 15, 25, 40, 50 and +60 y. RESULTS: For the cohort, and among White women, Pearson correlations between recalled BMI (Kg/M2) and pictorials for each decade ranged from 0.62-0.67 and was 0.80 for current BMI and current pictorial. The range of correlations between pictorials and recalled BMI for other race/ethnic groups were 0.72-0.87 (Black), 0.53-0.75 (Hispanic) and 0.28-0.87 (Asian). Among a subset of women with data on measured BMI, recalled BMI and pictorials at specific ages, the correlation between pictorials and measured BMI was 0.75, compared to the correlation between recalled BMI and measured BMI which was 0.89. CONCLUSION: Correlations are higher between recalled BMI and measured BMI compared to the correlation between pictorials and measured BMI. Therefore, estimates of body size by pictorials alone may not be appropriate for epidemiological investigations. Alternate uses of pictorials may include assessment body weight in low literate populations or in instances where body weight is not or has not been measured.

Adult↗

Comparison of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and measurement of total body water content by deuterium oxide dilution for estimating body composition in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare percentage of body fat (%BF) estimates from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) with those derived from total body water (TBW) determination by deuterium oxide (D2O) dilution. ANIMALS: 31 healthy, adult, purebred dogs of various ages and breeds (body weight, 15 to 39 kg). PROCEDURE: The TBW was measured by D2O dilution and subsequent analysis via nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Blood was collected before and 2 hours after IV administration of 275 mg of D2O/kg of body weight. Plasma was separated and stored at -30 C until analysis by deuterium NMR. The DEXA scans were obtained immediately after blood collection from dogs under general anesthesia. RESULTS: Measurements of %BF by DEXA averaged 15.8% higher than calculated estimates of TBW content by D2O dilution. The linear regression of %BF by TBW content on %BF by DEXA had a slope of 1.04 and a correlation coefficient of 0.84, indicating excellent relative agreement between methods despite the significant difference in absolute agreement between the 2 methods. The average difference between methods did not differ by breed, sex, body condition score, body weight, or %BF, as measured by DEXA. CONCLUSION: Comparability of our data with those of previous studies suggest that DEXA is useful for in vivo estimation of body composition in healthy dogs. Body fat estimated by D2O dilution will be less than that determined by DEXA, despite excellent relative agreement between methods.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Genetic variation in pure lines and crosses of large-bodied turkey lines. 1. Body weight, walking ability, and body measurements of live birds.

An experimental line of turkeys selected for increased BW (F) was reciprocally crossed with sire lines (designated A and B) from each of two major commercial breeders in order to study the inheritance of growth traits. All genetic groups were grown intermingled in confinement with the sexes reared in different houses. Traits measured included BW at 8, 16, and 20 wk of age; shank length, width, and depth; breast width; and walking ability scores at 16 wk of age. The F line had a different growth pattern than the two commercial sire lines. The F line had higher (males) or similar (females) BW in comparison to Line A at 8 wk of age, but by 16 wk of age, Line A was heavier than Line F in both sexes. The difference in BW between the F and A lines increased from 16 to 20 wk of age. Lines F and B did not differ in BW at 8 wk of age, but at 16 and 20 wk of age, Line B birds were heavier than those of F line. Reciprocal effects, a measure of sex linkage and maternal effects, were noted only for breast width of females in crosses of Lines A and F and for shank width and depth of males and 8-wk BW and shank depth of females in crosses of Lines B and F. Heterosis was an important source of variation in BW for males from both crosses. The percentage heterosis at the various ages ranged from 3.1 to 7.5. For females, heterosis (range = 2.6 to 4.9%) was only significant at younger ages (8 wk for the crosses of the A and F lines and 8 and 16 wk for the crosses of the B and F lines). No heterosis for breast width was observed in either cross. Heterosis in walking ability scores was significant only for males from the crosses of Lines B and F. The presence of heterosis was inconsistent for shank measurements.

Age Factors↗

[History of the determination body height from skeletal findings (body height determination for men). The proposed methods of body height determination from skeletal findings since the middle of the 20th century].

A scientific historical review of the procedures of stature estimation according to skeleton finds including a collection of important tables and formulae replacing the troublesome looking for formulae and tables in the scattered publications was still missing. In the 1st part, a collection of estimations published since the middle of the 18th century to the middle of the 20th century is therefore presented. In this part, a collection important procedures of stature estimation published since the middle of our century is given. The presentation follows the chronological succession. A short description of all mentioned base populations is included in the text. A thorough critical anthropological and statistical analysis of base populations and estimations was not intended, because this should be the topic of a separate research.

Age Factors↗