Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Azithromycin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Symptomatic syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion associated with azithromycin.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of symptomatic syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) secretion associated with azithromycin and review the literature related to this adverse drug reaction. DATA SOURCES: Review articles identified by a computerized (MEDLINE) (1966-April 1996) and manual (Index Medicus) search. DATA SYNTHESIS: Azithromycin is a well-tolerated broad-spectrum macrolide antibiotic. We report a symptomatic case of SIADH secretion associated with azithromycin. The patient received two doses of azithromycin before the development of sudden mental status changes associated with severe hyponatremia. All other potential causes were ruled out. No previous reports exist in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: Azithromycin may be associated with symptomatic SIADH secretion. Awareness and attention are required if patients develop mental status changes or hyponatremia while receiving azithromycin so that appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic actions can be implemented.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Efficacy and safety of azithromycin as monotherapy or combined with metronidazole compared with two standard multidrug regimens for the treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease.

The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of azithromycin, alone or with metronidazole, versus two standard multidrug regimens for the treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Patients with PID were treated with once-daily intravenous (i.v.) azithromycin 500 mg for 1 day or 2 days followed by once-daily azithromycin 250 mg orally for a total of 7 days, alone or with three-times-daily metronidazole 400 mg or 500 mg i.v. then orally for a total of 12-14 days. The comparators were either metronidazole + doxycycline + cefoxitin + probenecid or doxycycline + amoxycillin/clavulanate given at standard recommended doses for up to 21 days. In total, 309 patients were treated for PID. The diagnosis was confirmed laparoscopically in 74.8% of patients. Rates of clinical success for azithromycin, alone (97.1%) or with metronidazole (98.1%), were comparable to those for the comparator regimens (94.6%). Eradication rates for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Mycoplasma hominis and anaerobes were also comparable for each of the treatment groups. Both azithromycin regimens were well tolerated. In conclusion, azithromycin, alone or with metronidazole, provides a shorter, simpler treatment option for the successful management of acute PID.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2005

Long-term azithromycin in cystic fibrosis: another possible mechanism of action?

Azithromycin is used for the treatment of cystic fibrosis lung disease, although its mechanisms of action are not completely understood. Besides its antiinflammatory and antimicrobial activities, one possibility could be the overexpression induction of the multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP), which could affect chloride transport, thus overcoming the ion transport defect of cystic fibrosis. Seven patients were evaluated before and after 4 weeks of azithromycin treatment (500 mg once daily). Ion transport was studied in vivo by measuring nasal potential difference (NPD). MRP mRNA expression was studied in nasal cells by an internal standard-based semiquantitative RT-PCR assay. NPD was consistent with cystic fibrosis before treatment. After azithromycin treatment, sodium transport was still impaired, whereas a significant increase in chloride conductance was observed (p = 0.03). A significant direct correlation was found between MRP mRNA expression levels and NPD chloride response after azithromycin treatment (p = 0.04, r = 0.78). In conclusion, azithromycin may induce MRP overexpression and restore chloride conductance in the airways of cystic fibrosis patients. These findings suggest a new potential role of azithromycin in the treatment of cystic fibrosis pulmonary disease, i.e. the possibility to upregulate proteins whose function may, at least in part, compensate for the basic defect of cystic fibrosis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Azithromycin for cystic fibrosis.

During what is a relatively barren time for new therapies for cystic fibrosis (CF), azithromycin has received a lot of attention as a potential treatment for CF lung disease. Laboratory studies suggest that azithromycin may have indirect actions, including anti-inflammatory, in addition to the standard antibacterial properties. The unique pharmacokinetics of azithromycin sets it aside from other macrolide antibiotics, but may result in increased resistance patterns. Three well-designed randomised controlled trials have demonstrated a small but significant improvement in respiratory function (forced expiratory volume in one second) with azithromycin compared with placebo. These trial results are confirmed by a recent meta-analysis. Mild adverse events (wheeze, diarrhoea and nausea) were significantly increased in one trial. There is no clear consensus regarding the correct dose and length of treatment with azithromycin. The present review discusses the role of azithromycin in the management of cystic fibrosis and the need for close monitoring of patients started on this drug. In addition, clinics should liaise closely with their microbiology departments and monitor resistance patterns.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2006

Azithromycin reduces spontaneous and induced inflammation in DeltaF508 cystic fibrosis mice.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation plays a critical role in lung disease development and progression in cystic fibrosis. Azithromycin is used for the treatment of cystic fibrosis lung disease, although its mechanisms of action are poorly understood. We tested the hypothesis that azithromycin modulates lung inflammation in cystic fibrosis mice. METHODS: We monitored cellular and molecular inflammatory markers in lungs of cystic fibrosis mutant mice homozygous for the DeltaF508 mutation and their littermate controls, either in baseline conditions or after induction of acute inflammation by intratracheal instillation of lipopolysaccharide from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which would be independent of interactions of bacteria with epithelial cells. The effect of azithromycin pretreatment (10 mg/kg/day) given by oral administration for 4 weeks was evaluated. RESULTS: In naive cystic fibrosis mice, a spontaneous lung inflammation was observed, characterized by macrophage and neutrophil infiltration, and increased intra-luminal content of the pro-inflammatory cytokine macrophage inflammatory protein-2. After induced inflammation, cystic fibrosis mice combined exaggerated cellular infiltration and lower anti-inflammatory interleukin-10 production. In cystic fibrosis mice, azithromycin attenuated cellular infiltration in both baseline and induced inflammatory condition, and inhibited cytokine (tumor necrosis factor-alpha and macrophage inflammatory protein-2) release in lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation. CONCLUSION: Our findings further support the concept that inflammatory responses are upregulated in cystic fibrosis. Azithromycin reduces some lung inflammation outcome measures in cystic fibrosis mice. We postulate that some of the benefits of azithromycin treatment in cystic fibrosis patients are due to modulation of lung inflammation.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Single-dose azithromycin for respiratory tract infections.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety data of the use of single-dose azithromycin for respiratory tract infections in children and adults. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search (1990-September 2003) was performed to identify all pertinent studies and review articles. When appropriate information was not available in the literature, data were obtained from the product manufacturers or abstracts from international conferences. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All available studies were reviewed to provide pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, efficacy, and safety data on use of single-dose azithromycin for respiratory tract infections. DATA SYNTHESIS: Several studies have demonstrated that shorter regimens of azithromycin (1500 mg over 3 day vs 5 day or single dose vs 3 day) provide higher serum exposures compared with the longer regimens. This makes it possible to give the same dose over a shorter period of time and achieve the same efficacy with the potential for enhanced adherence. Single-dose azithromycin 30 mg/kg was approved in 2003 for treatment of acute otitis media (AOM) in children. Studies have demonstrated that, when administering azithromycin as a single dose, its efficacy and safety are comparable to that of other standard regimens for AOM. Single-dose regimens for treatment of respiratory tract infections in adults have not been studied widely, with only 2 studies being conducted for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and one study for treatment of tonsillitis; all demonstrated at least equal efficacy with the single-dose regimen compared with comparators given for longer periods of time. CONCLUSIONS: Available data regarding single-dose azithromycin are promising. Although use of this regimen in children is warranted based on studies to date, additional large-scale trials are needed prior to mainstream use of the regimen in adults.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Azithromycin for improving pulmonary function in cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature concerning the use of azithromycin in the treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). DATA SOURCES: A search of MEDLINE (1966-April 2004), Embase (1980-April 2004), and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1971-April 2004) was performed. Search terms included cystic fibrosis, macrolide, and azithromycin. DATA SYNTHESIS: Four studies have been performed in 7-185 patients (children and adults) over a 3- to 6-month period. The azithromycin dosage ranged from 250 mg 3 times weekly to 500 mg daily. The trials reported an improvement in percent predicted forced expiratory volume ranging from 2.95% to 6.2% in patients treated with azithromycin compared with those receiving placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Azithromycin appeared to improve pulmonary function in adults and older children with CF and was well tolerated when administered for 6 months. Further research is needed to determine an optimal dosage regimen, duration of treatment, effects on quality of life, and cost-effectiveness of azithromycin therapy.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2005

A cost-minimization analysis comparing azithromycin-based and levofloxacin-based protocols for the treatment of patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia: results from the CAP-IN trial.

BACKGROUND: A randomized trial was performed comparing azithromycin and levofloxacin for treating moderately to severely ill patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. This is a cost-minimization analysis comparing those regimens. METHODS: The cost-minimization analysis compares 81 patients receiving sequential therapy with IV azithromycin plus IV ceftriaxone followed by oral azithromycin with 82 patients receiving IV levofloxacin followed by oral levofloxacin, all with complete economic data over approximately 30 days, including information about hospitalization, study medications, home care, postdischarge utilization, and lost productivity. Units of utilization were multiplied by unit prices in order to estimate cost per patient. These total costs were compared using a two-sample t test. RESULTS: Direct medical costs of the azithromycin group were 2,481 US dollars less than the corresponding costs in the levofloxacin group (p = 0.03; 95% confidence interval, 238 US dollars to 4,724 US dollars). Most of the cost difference (2,300 US dollars) is attributable to hospital days, with the majority of these days being spent on the general medicine wards. The precise magnitude of the cost advantage attributable to azithromycin, if any, depends on both the reduction in length of hospital stay and its associated daily cost. CONCLUSIONS: Azithromycin was no more costly than levofloxacin, and perhaps less so. Cost is but one of many factors that should be considered by clinicians in decisions involving any individual patient.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Azithromycin: indications for the future?

The global challenge of optimally treating bacterial infections is continuously evolving. Azithromycin, the first azalide antibiotic, presents pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics that allow for a simple dosing regimen with minimal side effects. Current azithromycin uses include a variety of community-acquired respiratory tract, skin and soft tissue, and sexually transmitted disease infections. Azithromycin has also demonstrated substantial activity against atypical organisms such as Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and Chlamydia trachomatis. Due to a never-ending need for new antibiotic therapies, several other potential indications for azithromycin are being researched. This article will present various current research associated with azithromycin's potential use for malaria, trachoma, coronary artery disease (CAD), Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections, erythema migrans, short-term therapy for respiratory infections, typhoid, cryptosporidiosis, pelvic inflammatory disease, acne, Mediterranean spotted fever and MAC. As bacterial and parasite resistance patterns fluctuate globally, azithromycin may be an alternative therapy for the previously mentioned indications, which will also enhance patient compliance and therefore effectively eradicate infection worldwide.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2002

Azithromycin for the treatment and control of trachoma.

Trachoma, a recurrent follicular conjunctivitis caused by Chlamydia trachomatis, is the leading cause of preventable blindness worldwide. Efforts to control this disease have met with limited success. This failure is due in part to the limitations of conventional antibiotic treatment, a prolonged course of topical tetracycline. Azithromycin, an azalide antibiotic, is effective against chlamydial infections when given as a single oral dose. Recent research from Africa has shown azithromycin to be as effective as tetracycline in the treatment of trachoma. Under operational conditions azithromycin proved to be more effective. This success is attributed to a much-improved compliance with treatment. Community-wide mass treatment with azithromycin is advocated as a means of controlling trachoma in endemic countries. Questions still remain over the use of azithromycin for this purpose. The frequency and target population of mass distribution campaigns need to be defined. A few countries are beneficiaries of a philanthropic donation by the manufacturer of azithromycin, Pfizer Inc. However, in the absence of a drug donation programme the cost-effectiveness of this measure is unclear.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2004

Azithromycin and warfarin interaction.

A 57-year-old Caucasian woman came to the clinic with symptoms of an upper respiratory tract infection. She was treated with a 5-day course of oral azithromycin 500 mg on day 1, then 250 mg/day for 4 days. During this period, the patient decreased her cigarette smoking from 1 pack/day to 1 pack every 3 days. No additional confounding variables were present. Two days after the completion of therapy, her international normalized ratio (INR) was 8.32. Six case reports documented in the literature have suggested an azithromycin-warfarin interaction with a resultant increase in INR. Many confounding variables existed in each of these cases, such as hepatic dysfunction, poor appetite, and concomitant drugs that resulted in an increased anticoagulant response. We report a case that involved only one potential confounding variable. Continued documentation of azithromycin-warfarin interactions is valuable considering no mention of this drug interaction exists in most tertiary references and in the package insert for azithromycin, the demonstration that no drug interaction occurred in a retrospective review of 52 cases, and the widespread use of azithromycin in the community. Clinicians should be mindful when prescribing azithromycin in combination with warfarin, and INR values should be monitored.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Comparative efficacies and tolerabilities of intravenous azithromycin plus ceftriaxone and intravenous levofloxacin with step-down oral therapy for hospitalized patients with moderate to severe community-acquired pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of ceftriaxone plus azithromycin with those of levofloxacin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with moderate to severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). DESIGN: Randomized, open-label multicenter trial with 1 : 1 treatment allocation in an inpatient setting. PATIENTS: 212 male or female inpatients with a clinical diagnosis of CAP were included in the study. In each treatment group >50% of patients had a pneumonia severity index of IV or V. INTERVENTIONS: Open-label treatment with either intravenous (IV) ceftriaxone 1g and IV azithromycin 500 mg daily or IV levofloxacin 500 mg daily. Patients who improved clinically were switched to oral follow-on therapy with either azithromycin 500 mg/day or levofloxacin 500 mg/day. At the clinician's discretion, oral cefuroxime axetil was added to the treatment regimen of patients who received oral azithromycin if a macrolide resistant pneumococcal isolate was documented. RESULTS: Overall, both study treatments were well tolerated. Favorable clinical outcomes in clinically evaluable patients were demonstrated in 91.5% of patients treated with ceftriaxone plus azithromycin and 89.3% (95% CI -7.1%, 11.4%) of patients treated with levofloxacin at the end of therapy visit and in 89.2% and 85.1% (95% CI -6.7%, 14.8%) patients, respectively, at the end of study visit. Bacteriological eradication rates for both treatments were equivalent with the exception of Streptococcus pneumoniae; 44% of isolates were eradicated with levofloxacin compared with 100% of isolates with ceftriaxone plus azithromycin. CONCLUSIONS: As acknowledged by international CAP treatment guidelines, the combination of a third-generation cephalosporin and a macrolide is at least as efficacious as monotherapy with a fluoroquinolone with enhanced anti-pneumococcal activity, for hospitalized patients with moderate to severe CAP. Combined medication with a macrolide and third-generation cephalosporin may be preferred over fluoroquinolones as first-line therapy of hospitalized patients with CAP to minimize the development of multiresistant nosocomial Gram-negative bacilli.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2002

Activity of azithromycin against Leishmania major in vitro and in vivo.

Azithromycin, an azalide antibiotic of the macrolide family, concentrates in the tissues and especially in macrophages. Because Leishmania parasites reside in these cells, we tested this antibiotic for a possible antileishmanial activity in vitro and in vivo. Azithromycin decreased the Leishmania major promastigote count in cell-free cultures at log phase approximately 50-fold. In macrophage cultures infected with L. major amastigotes, azithromycin caused a significant decrease in parasite levels with an ED50 of 12 microg/ml. The activity in vivo was evaluated after infection of the footpads of susceptible BALB/cByJ mice and resistant C57BL/6J mice with L. major. Treatment of BALB/cByJ mice with azithromycin, 100 to 200 mg/kg/d, resulted in a significant decrease in lesion size and in the number of parasites per lesion, whereas no effect was seen in the treated C57BL/6J mice. Azithromycin has activity against L. major in vitro and in vivo. Given the severity of the disease and the limitations of the available therapeutic agents, azithromycin may have a significant role in the treatment of this group of diseases.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Azithromycin compared with amoxicillin in the treatment of erythema migrans. A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether azithromycin or amoxicillin is more efficacious for the treatment of erythema migrans skin lesions, which are characteristic of Lyme disease. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study. Acute manifestations and sequelae were assessed using a standardized format. Baseline clinical characteristics and response were correlated with serologic results. Patients were followed for 180 days. SETTING: 12 outpatient centers in eight states. PATIENTS: 246 adult patients with erythema migrans lesions at least 5 cm in diameter were enrolled and were stratified by the presence of flu-like symptoms (such as fever, chills, headache, malaise, fatigue, arthralgias, and myalgias) before randomization. INTERVENTION: Oral treatment with either amoxicillin, 500 mg three times daily for 20 days, or azithromycin, 500 mg once daily for 7 days. Patients who received azithromycin also received a dummy placebo so that the dosing schedules were identical. RESULTS: Of 217 evaluable patients, those treated with amoxicillin were significantly more likely than those treated with azithromycin to achieve complete resolution of disease at day 20, the end of therapy (88% compared with 76%; P=0.024). More azithromycin recipients (16%) than amoxicillin recipients (4%) had relapse (P=0.005). A partial response at day 20 was highly predictive of relapse (27% of partial responders had relapse compared with 6% of complete responders; P<0.001). For patients treated with azithromycin, development of an antibody response increased the possibility of achieving a complete response (81% of seropositive patients achieved a complete response compared with 60% of seronegative patients; P=0.043). Patients with multiple erythema migrans lesions were more likely than patients with single erythema migrans lesions (P<0.001) to have a positive antibody titer at baseline (63% compared with 17% for IgM; 39% compared with 16% for IgG). Fifty-seven percent of patients who had relapse were seronegative at the time of relapse. CONCLUSIONS: A 20-day course of amoxicillin was found to be an effective regimen for erythema migrans. Most patients were seronegative for Borrelia burgdorferi at the time of presentation with erythema migrans (65%) and at the time of relapse (57%).

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Treatment of shigellosis: V. Comparison of azithromycin and ciprofloxacin. A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of shigellosis is currently limited by the high prevalence of multidrug-resistant strains of Shigella. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of azithromycin in the treatment of shigellosis. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind clinical trial. SETTING: Diarrhea treatment center in Dhaka, Bangladesh. PATIENTS: 70 men with shigellosis that had lasted 72 hours or less. INTERVENTIONS: Patients stayed in the hospital for 6 days. Thirty-four patients were randomly assigned to receive 500 mg of azithromycin on study day 1, followed by 250 mg once daily for 4 days; 36 patients were assigned to receive 500 mg of ciprofloxacin every 12 hours for 5 days. MEASUREMENTS: Clinical treatment failure was considered to have occurred if frank dysentery persisted for 72 hours after therapy began or if on study day 5 a patient had more than six stools, had any bloody-mucoid stools, had more than one watery stool, or had an oral body temperature exceeding 37.8 degrees C. Bacteriologic treatment failure was considered to have occurred if Shigella strains could be isolated from a stool sample after study day 2. Therapy was considered either clinically or bacteriologically successful in patients who completed therapy and did not meet criteria for failure. RESULTS: Therapy was clinically successful in 28 (82%) patients who received azithromycin and 32 (89%) patients who received ciprofloxacin (difference, -7% [95% Cl, -23% to 10%]). Therapy was bacteriologically successful in 32 (94%) patients receiving azithromycin and 36 (100%) patients receiving ciprofloxacin (difference, -6% [Cl, -14% to 2%]). Peak serum concentrations of azithromycin were equal to the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the infecting Shigella strains, whereas serum concentrations of ciprofloxacin were 28 times the MIC. Stool concentrations of both drugs were more than 200 times the MIC. CONCLUSION: Azithromycin is effective in the treatment of moderate to severe shigellosis caused by multidrug-resistant Shigella strains.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Pilot study of the use of community volunteers to distribute azithromycin for trachoma control in Ghana.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the skills of community health volunteers in diagnosing active trachoma and distributing azithromycin in the Northern Region of Ghana. METHODS: Six community health volunteers from Daboya were trained to diagnose trachoma and to treat the disease using azithromycin. They were also informed of the drug's possible side-effects. Under supervision, each volunteer then examined, and if necessary treated, 15 households. The dose of azithromycin was determined by weight; height was also measured. Tablets were given in preference to suspension when possible. RESULTS: The volunteers' diagnostic sensitivity for active trachoma was 63%; their specificity was 96%. At the household level, their "decision to treat" was correct in 83% of households. In 344 treatment episodes, volunteers planned a dose of azithromycin outside the range 15-30 mg/kg on only seven occasions (2.0% of all planned treatments). The volunteers' drug management skills were good, the response of the community was excellent, and adverse reactions were infrequent. Diagnosis of active trachoma, record-keeping skills, and knowledge of side-effects were found to need greater emphasis in any future education programme. Most people aged four years or older were able to swallow tablets. For those taking tablets, the correlation between the data gathered for height and weight shows that calculating azithromycin doses by height is a valid alternative to calculating it by weight. CONCLUSION: Trained community health volunteers have a potential role in identifying active trachoma and distributing azithromycin. To simplify training and logistics, it may be better to base dosage schedules on height rather than weight for those taking tablets, which included most people aged four years or more in the population studied.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Efficacy of oral azithromycin versus topical tetracycline in mass treatment of endemic trachoma.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact of mass treatment with oral azithromycin and topical tetracycline on the prevalence of active trachoma. METHODS: A total of 1803 inhabitants from 106 households of eight Gambian villages were randomized, in pairs, to receive either three doses of azithromycin at weekly intervals, or daily topical tetracycline over 6 weeks. Ocular examinations were conducted before treatment, and 2, 6 and 12 months after treatment. FINDINGS: Prior to treatment, 16% of the study participants had active trachoma. Two months after treatment, the prevalence of trachoma was 4.6% and 5.1% in the azithromycin and the tetracycline groups, respectively (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.53, 2.02). Subsequently, the prevalence rose to 16% in the tetracycline group, while remaining at 7.7% in the azithromycin group (adjusted OR at 12 months = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.34, 0.80). At 12 months post-treatment, there were fewer new prevalent cases in the azithromycin group, and trachoma resolution was significantly better for this group (adjusted OR = 2.02; 95% CI = 1.42, 3.50). CONCLUSION: Oral azithromycin therefore appears to offer a means for controlling blinding trachoma. It is easy to administer and higher coverages may be possible than have been achieved hitherto.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Single dose (direct observed) azithromycin therapy for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in STD clinic attenders with genital discharge in Trinidad and Tobago.

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and to assess the efficacy of a single one gram oral dose of azithromycin under direct observed therapy of genital discharge due to Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infections in STD clinic attenders in Trinidad and Tobago. All patients with genital discharge and their contacts were given one gram oral dose of azithromycin under direct supervision after collection of urethral and cervical swabs for N gonorrhoeae culture and smear and for C trachomatis antigen detection by ELISA. Clinical and microbiological evaluation was done on those who returned after 7-10 days for follow-up. Of the 735 patients who were enrolled in the study, 319 (43.4%) had N gonorrhoeae and 100 (13.6%) had C trachomatis. Only 151 (36%) of the 419 patients with a pathogenic isolate returned for clinical and microbiological assessment. The remaining 268 (64%) of the 419 patients were lost to follow-up. One hundred and forty-three patients (94.7%) had total abatement of signs and symptoms after taking azithromycin. One patient (0.65%), who had both N gonorrhoeae and C trachomatis, improved clinically with the drug. Seven patients (six with N gonorrhoeae and one with C trachomatis) failed to respond clinically to azithromycin. Microbiological eradication was achieved in 115 (100%) patients who had single infection with N gonorrhoeae and in 23 patients (96%) with C trachomatis infection. Of 12 patients with combined infections, N gonorrhoeae and C trachomatis were eradicated in 10 and 12 patients, respectively, after initial treatment. In two patients with combined infection, N gonorrhoeae continued to be isolated after treatment with azithromycin. A single one gram oral dose of azithromycin under direct supervision is useful in the treatment of uncomplicated genital infection with N gonorrhoeae and C trachomatis in STD clinic attenders in Trinidad.

Adolescent↗