Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “recommendations”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Cancer pain assessment and management recommendations by hospice nurses. University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.

Pain is often the most prevalent symptom among cancer patients referred to hospice or palliative care programs. This study was designed to use performance-based testing to evaluate the skills of hospice nurses in assessing the severe pain of a cancer patient and the pain management recommendations they would present to the patient's primary care physician. Twenty-seven hospice nurses (ranging in experience from 1 month to 10 years) were presented with the same standardized patient with cancer pain. In Part A (7 minutes), one of the investigators checked for predetermined behaviors as the nurses performed the clinical pain assessment. In Part B (7 minutes), the nurses answered questions regarding their recommendations for pain management for the patient seen in Part A. In the admission pain assessment, hospice nurses did well in assessing pain intensity (85%), pain location (70%), and pain-relieving factors (59%). However, only 48% of the nurses adequately assessed the pain onset, and only 44% adequately assessed other symptoms the patient might be experiencing. In Part B, 96% of the nurses recommended opioids, 96% recommended the oral route of administration, and 82% recommended regular dosing of the opioids. Fifty-six percent of nurses included a breakthrough medication in their analgesic recommendations. All of the hospice nurses treated the patient's fear of addiction in an appropriate manner, and 93% of the nurses recommended increasing the patient's opioid dosage to treat the persisting pain problem. There were no significant differences among nurses with regard to length of time as a hospice nurse or hospice certification on any of the items in either Part A or Part B. Most practicing hospice nurses were judged to be competent in the assessment and management of the severe pain of the standardized cancer patient, although some deficits were noted. Regular oral opioids were the analgesics of choice. Co-analgesics were rarely recommended.

Hospice Care↗
PubMed1996

Phase II of the AHCPR-sponsored heart failure guideline: translating practice recommendations into review criteria.

BACKGROUND: In 1992, under the sponsorship of the U.S. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, RAND assembled an expert panel to develop the Heart Failure Clinical Practice Guideline. Phase II of the effort was intended to identify which of the guideline's recommendations the panel felt were suitable for use in retrospective utilization review and quality assessment programs and to develop review criteria, performance measures, and standards of quality for use in monitoring compliance with those recommendations. SELECTION OF RECOMMENDATIONS: Selecting guideline recommendations for translation into review criteria and ultimately into standards of care was a multistep process comprising (1) identification of 34 recommendations from the guideline, (2) rating them on the basis of importance to quality of care and feasibility of monitoring, (3) review by a subcommittee and the full guideline panel, (4) translation into review criteria, and (5) further review and input by panelists and peer and pilot reviewers. Finally, standards of care (the minimum proportion of cases expected to be in accordance with guideline recommendations) were determined to be 90%-95% for six of the final criteria and 75%-80% for the other two. CONCLUSION: Despite some reservations, physicians and other health care professionals agreed to be held accountable for following a core set of guideline recommendations for the treatment of heart failure. Substantial progress was made in identifying recommendations that panelists and reviewers were willing to endorse in utilization review activities, including adoption of improved documentation standards. The review criteria's major impact may be the knowledge that the criteria are in place and that care is being monitored based on those standards.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗
PubMed2003

Iron supplementation during pregnancy in Sweden: to what extent is the national recommendation followed?

BACKGROUND: While there has been a worldwide trend to reduce the recommended amount of iron in prenatal supplements, this has still not been implemented in Sweden. It is likely that the current national recommendation of 100 mg of iron/day to all pregnant women provides a larger amount of iron than warranted and results in increased occurrence of side-effects and reduced compliance. This may also reduce midwives' motivation to implement the recommendation. The aim of this study was to assess adherence to the current recommendation and to describe factors associated with prescription and use of iron supplements. METHODS: A questionnaire capturing determinants for and use of prenatal iron supplementation was distributed to newly delivered women and midwives in five regions of Sweden. In addition, an inquiry about implementation of the recommendation was sent to all senior obstetricians in charge of antenatal care. RESULTS: Most (79%) of the senior obstetricians indicated adherence to the national recommendation. A lower percentage of midwives (41%) and a further lower proportion of pregnant women (28%) did so. Despite limited compliance to the recommendation, the majority of pregnant women had used some type of iron-containing supplement. Side-effects of supplements, perceived need and advice from midwives influenced their use. Many midwives preferred and practiced a selective supplementation strategy. CONCLUSIONS: The current recommendation is not practiced. Side-effects and perceptions that the amount of iron is larger than necessary contribute to its limited use. A revision is needed to address the amount of iron required and strategies to ensure good adherence.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

The need to review the Spanish recommended dietary energy and nutrient intakes.

BACKGROUND: In the last decade, research in the field of nutrition has grown both in width and depth, and has incorporated the advances of other scientific fields, like artificial intelligence theories. Specifically in the case of recommended nutrient intakes, the fuzzy theory is an interesting contribution to the development of a new concept for the recommendations. The recommended intakes have passed from avoiding deficiency status to preventing several pathological aspects and reducing risk factors. OBJECTIVE: To establish whether the recommended dietary intakes for Spain (IREs) must be reviewed, taking into account the current scientific state of the art. METHODS: We have compared IREs, published in 1994, with the recently published 'Dietary Reference Intakes' (DRIs) for the American and Canadian population, the 'Referenzwerte für die Nährstoffzufuhr' (DACH) for the German, Swiss and Austrian population. In addition, the main guidelines of the EURODIET criteria (Nutrition and Diet for Healthy Lifestyles), which was developed for the population of the European Union Member States, were taken into account. As an example, comparisons were made for the elderly population group, establishing differences and similarities between the different scientific communities and the adequacy of Spanish recommended intakes for energy and nutrients. RESULTS: Recommended intakes for folate, calcium and vitamins C, D and E are lower in the IREs and probably should be increased. Recommended intakes for nutrients which have not previously been included in the IREs, such as vitamin K, selenium, copper, chromium, molybdenum, manganese, phosphorus, sodium, potassium, and water need to be developed. CONCLUSIONS: The current recommended intakes for the Spanish population need to be reviewed in order to encompass current scientific knowledge. Moreover, the opportunity to include non-nutrients (bioactive compounds) should be considered.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

[The new German resuscitation guidelines in the context of international recommendations].

The German Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation were adapted to match the revised International Guidelines. The revised German edition was based both on the guidelines issued by the American Heart Association (AHA) in 1992 and on those of the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) of 1998, as well as on those released by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) in 1997. Due to the diverging instructions for action the emergency physicians felt considerably unsafe as to what they should really do to achieve maximum results. Only 10.3 per cent of the german emergency physicians followed the recommendations given by the German Federal Chamber of Physicians. Innovations in respect of the basic checkup concern the time for controlling the respiration and circulation (ten seconds). Contrary to the international recommendations the "diagnostic block" is performed in Germany without interspersing basic reanimation. In artificial respiration the tidal volume has been reduced to 600 ml in accordance to the ERC and ILCOR guidelines. The search for the pressure point for cardiac pressure massage has also been adapted to the international recommendations. Also in accordance with the international recommendations defibrillation in case of ventricular fibrillation is now being performed only thrice in series without interspersed basic reanimation. There is some uncertainty with regard to choosing the requisite energy: 16.6% of the emergency physicians opt for less than 200 joule in primary defibrillation whereas 13% are in favour of more than 200 joule. Contrary to the international recommendations which prescribe peripheral venous access as application site for reanimation by drugs, the german guidelines favour the endobronchial path, which is already being practised by 57.4% of the emergency physicians. Hence, emergency medication can be effected in Germany 4 minutes earlier than in other countries. After three unsuccessful applications of 1 mg each of adrenalin the dosage is increased to 5 mg, and in agreement with the AHA guidelines escalating doses are also possible. Sodium bicarbonate is recommended only after more than 20 minutes of reanimation and if so, only in a reduced dose of 0.5 mval/kg body weight. In accordance with the international recommendations there is now a universal algorithm that decides on application only between ventricular fibrillation and nonfibrillation. The new german recommendations have adapted the reanimation procedure in agreement with ERC to national usage without abandoning any principles of the international guidelines.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation↗
PubMed2000

Older adults need guidance to meet nutritional recommendations.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the diet of healthy, free-living senior volunteers to the dietary reference intakes (DRIs) and Food Guide Pyramid recommendations. METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional assessment of dietary habits, as measured using a standardized food frequency questionnaire, among 1,740 healthy Southwestern U.S. adults, aged 51 to 85 years. Assessment of independently-living volunteers to chemoprevention trials provides an efficient mechanism to profile typical dietary habits among the older adult population. RESULTS: Daily estimated macronutrient intakes exceeded recommended proportions of protein and fat. In contrast, more than 60% of this senior population reported dietary vitamin D, vitamin E, folate and calcium intakes below estimated average requirements (EAR). Based on the Food Guide Pyramid recommendations, fewer than 10% of the older adults consumed the recommended daily dairy and grain servings. More females than males consumed recommended vegetable (49% versus 40%) and fruit (53% versus 48%) servings (p < 0.05). More males consumed recommended grain (11% versus 7%) and protein (78% versus 73%) servings (p < 0.05) than females. CONCLUSIONS: Mean micronutrient intakes compared well with DRIs, although fewer than one-half of these older adults consumed recommended levels for vitamin D, vitamin E, folate, and calcium or daily food servings of dairy, grains, vegetables or fruits. Since the beneficial aspects of foods are not limited to essential nutrients, nutrition recommendations to older adults may be improved by emphasizing daily servings of nutrient-dense choices within the Food Pyramid.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Why don't they listen? Adherence to recommendations of infectious disease consultations.

The effectiveness of an infectious diseases (ID) consultation is dependent on adherence to the recommendations. To delineate the factors that affect adherence, we conducted a prospective cohort study of 465 consultations at 2 academic institutions in which we evaluated the consultation process, patient and consultant characteristics, types of recommendations, and compliance with recommendations. The overall compliance rate was 80%, with 85% adherence to crucial recommendations. Multivariate analysis revealed that adherence to ID recommendations was higher when the recommendations were therapeutic instead of diagnostic, when they related to a specific clinical question, when recommendations were deemed crucial by the ID service, if the primary service was medicine, and if the consultation note was legible and organized. Whether modification of consultant practice will lead to improved recommendation compliance and patient outcomes warrants further study.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Provider characteristics and mammography recommendation among women in their 40s and 50s.

OBJECTIVES: Healthcare provider recommendation for mammography is one of the strongest predictors of women's mammography use, but few studies have examined the association of provider characteristics with mammography recommendations. We examined the relationship of provider gender, age, medical specialty, and duration of relationship with the patient to report mammography recommendation. METHODS: Participants were women ages 40-45 and 50-55 who were part of a larger intervention study of decision making about mammography. We examined the relationship of provider characteristics to patient-reported mammography recommendations at baseline and at 24-month follow-up. RESULTS: At baseline, 74% of women in their 40s and 79% of women in their 50s reported provider mammography recommendations within the prior 2 years. Proportions were similar at the 24-month follow-up. In multivariate logistic regression models including both patient and provider characteristics, women in their 40s who had female providers were more likely to report mammography recommendations than those with male providers at baseline (OR=1.83, p=0.01) and follow-up (OR=1.74, p=0.03). Among women in their 50s, participants whose regular providers were primary care physicians were more likely to report recommendations at baseline than those whose regular providers were obstetrician/gynecologists (OR=1.68, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: About one fourth of women in this study reported not having been advised by a healthcare provider to have a mammogram. All women in the study had health insurance. Among women in their 40s, for whom mammography guidelines were controversial at the time of data collection, provider gender was an important predictor of patient-reported mammography recommendation.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Issues in establishing vitamin D recommendations for infants and children.

In 1963, the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition recommended 400 IU of vitamin D per day for all infants and children. After the late 1970s, this became an inconsistent recommendation, particularly for breast-feeding infants. In 2003, however, the Committee on Nutrition of the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended 200 IU/d vitamin D for all infants and children. This was in response to the vitamin D adequate intake recommendations made by the Institute of Medicine in 1997, the increasing number of reports of nutritional rickets in certain populations of American infants, and the Healthy People 2010 goal of having 75% of infants breast-fed for the first 6 mo of life. In making these recommendations, many issues were taken into consideration, including the following. 1) Vitamin D deficiency is more than rickets, which is the final stage of the deficient state among growing children. 2) Adequate sunlight exposure cannot be determined exactly for every subject. 3) There is new awareness of the hazards of ultraviolet-B light exposure in childhood and the subsequent development of skin cancer in adulthood. 4) There is decreasing intake of vitamin D-fortified foods among older children and adolescents. More research is needed in the pediatric population to determine the recommended dietary allowance of vitamin D. A new definition of vitamin D deficiency that would make use of normal serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 in a given population is needed. The recommended intake of 200 IU/d may not be enough. More data are needed to support the adequacy of the present and possibly even higher recommended vitamin D daily intakes.

Breast Feeding↗
PubMed1995

Recommendations for the reporting of breast carcinoma. Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology.

The Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology (ADASP) has named several committees to develop recommendations regarding the content of the surgical pathology report for common malignant tumors. A committee of individuals with special interest and expertise write the recommendations, and they are reviewed and approved by the council of ADASP and subsequently by the entire membership. The recommendations have been divided into four major areas: (1) items that provide an informative gross description; (2) additional diagnostic features that are recommended to be included in every report if possible; (3) optional features that may be included in the final report; (4) A checklist (see Appendix). The purpose of these recommendations is to provide an informative report for the clinician. The recommendations are intended as suggestions and adherence to them is completely voluntary. In special clinical circumstances, the recommendations may not be applicable. The recommendations are intended as an educational resource rather than a mandate.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1996

Recommendations for the reporting of resected large intestinal carcinomas. Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology.

The Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology (ADASP) has named several committees to develop recommendations regarding the content of the surgical pathology report for common malignant tumors. A committee of individuals with special interest and expertise write the recommendations, and they are reviewed and approved by the council of ADASP and subsequently by the entire membership. The recommendations have been divided into four major areas: (1) Items that provide an informative gross description; (2) Additional diagnostic features that are recommended to be included in every report if possible; (3) Optional features that may be included in the final report; and (4) A checklist. The purpose of these recommendations is to provide an informative report for the clinician. The recommendations are intended as suggestions and adherence to them is completely voluntary. In special clinical circumstances, the original recommendations may not be applicable. The recommendations are intended as an educational resource rather than a mandate.

Carcinoma↗
PubMed1998

Ethnic disparities in patient recall of physician recommendations of diagnostic and treatment procedures for coronary disease.

Despite the proven benefits of many cardiac procedures, some are used less frequently for African Americans than for white patients with known or suspected coronary disease. This study explored differences between ethnic groups that may affect patient recall of physician recommendations of cardiac procedures. Also examined were patients' responses when asked about adhering to those recommendations. The data examined were collected from interviews with 1,333 African American and white hospital inpatients with known coronary disease admitted to the Birmingham-Black Health Seeking for Coronary Heart Disease Project (1989-1990) in Alabama. Respondents were asked to recall previous health care encounters, physician recommendations of cardiac procedures, and adherence to those recommendations. Compared with whites, fewer African American patients recalled physicians recommending some cardiac procedures. If procedure recommendations were recalled, no ethnic differences were found in patient recall of adhering to those recommendations. Predictors of recall of the recommended procedures were identified by multivariate logistic regression. Patients' knowledge of having coronary disease was the common factor that predicted their recall of all cardiac procedures. Other predictor variables included some cardiac risk factors and symptoms, socioeconomic status, and ethnicity. Although health care practice is influenced by many factors, it is important to examine variables that may lead to a reduction in ethnic disparities in coronary disease morbidity and mortality.

Black or African American↗
PubMed2005

Improving the care of individuals with schizophrenia and substance use disorders: consensus recommendations.

National attention continues to focus on the need to improve care for individuals with co-occurring mental illnesses and substance use disorders, as emphasized in the 2003 President's New Freedom Commission Report on Mental Health and recent publications from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). These reports document the need for best practice recommendations that can be translated into routine clinical care. Although efforts are underway to synthesize literature in this area, few focused recommendations are available that include expert opinion and evidence-based findings on the management of specific co-occurring disorders, such as schizophrenia and addiction. In response to the need for user-friendly recommendations on the treatment of schizophrenia and addiction, a consensus conference of experts from academic institutions and state mental health systems was organized to 1) frame the problem from clinical and systems-level perspectives; 2) identify effective and problematic psychosocial, pharmacological, and systems practices; and 3) develop a summary publication with recommendations for improving current practice. The results of the consensus meeting served as the foundation for this publication, which presents a broad set of recommendations for clinicians who treat individuals with schizophrenia. "Integrated treatment" is the new standard for evidence-based treatment for this population and recommendations are given to help clinicians implement such integrated treatment. Specific recommendations are provided concerning screening for substance use disorders in patients with schizophrenia, assessing motivation for change, managing medical conditions that commonly occur in patients with dual diagnoses (e.g., cardiovascular disease, liver complications, lung cancer, HIV, and hepatitis B or C infections) and selecting the most appropriate medications for such patients to maximize safety and minimize drug interactions, use of evidence-based psychosocial interventions for patients with dual diagnoses (e.g., Dual Recovery Therapy, modified cognitive-behavioral therapy, modified motivational enhancement therapy, and the Substance Abuse Management Module), and key pharmacotherapy principles for treating schizophrenia, substance use disorders, and comorbid anxiety, depression, and sleep problems in this population. Finally the article reviews programmatic and systemic changes needed to overcome treatment barriers and promote the best outcomes for this patient population. An algorithm summarizing the consensus recommendations is provided in an appendix.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2006

Receipt of recommended therapy by patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate utilization of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy among patients with stage II or III colon cancer and stage II/III rectal or rectosigmoid cancer, as recommended by current national guidelines. METHODS: This cross-sectional study at the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Houston, TX) used 1999-2003 administrative data to identify patients with a diagnostic code for colorectal cancer. Medical charts were then abstracted to identify an incident cohort with stage II or III cancer. Outcome of interest was receipt of recommended therapy defined as surgery only (stage II colon) or surgery with adjuvant chemo- or radiotherapy (stage III colon or stage II/III rectal/rectosigmoid cancer). Potential determinants of receipt of recommended therapy were analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 197 incident cases diagnosed or treated, mean age of patients was 66 yr (SD, 11 yr), 64% were Caucasian, and 98.5% were men. A gastroenterologist diagnosed 72.5% tumors including 62 stage II colon, 62 stage III colon, and 73 stage II/III rectal cancers. Referral to oncology occurred in 76% of stage II colon, 92% of stage III colon, and 99% of rectal cancers. 87% of stage II and 71% of stage III colon cancer patients received recommended therapy, compared to only 42.5% of rectal cancer patients. Predictors of receipt of recommended therapy among rectal cancers included being married (OR, 5.3; 95% CI: 1.6-17.1), presentation at tumor board (OR, 3.6; 95% CI: 1.2-11.2), or age<65 yr (OR, 3.5; 95% CI: 1.3-9.3). When patient's comorbidity and physician's decision-making process were considered in the assessment of the outcome, only presentation at tumor board remained predictive of receipt of recommended therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Most colon cancer patients at a major VA medical center receive recommended therapy. Among rectal cancer patients, those presented at tumor board are most likely to receive recommended therapy.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Clinical practice guidelines. USPSTF recommendations.

The set of USPSTF recommendations provides a valuable resource for clinicians in varied practice settings. Although the 2nd edition of recommendations addressed over 200 topics, only six statements have been released as part of the 3rd edition thus far. Others, not reviewed in this article include: screening for newborn hearing, screening for bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy, and screening for lipid disorders. The recommendations are conservative and, like all clinical practice guidelines, should be considered in light of one's philosophy of practice. The recommendations meet many of the criteria addressed in the initial column of this series. The factors considered by the panel members are identified, including accuracy of available screening methodologies, cost factors, and benefit/risk determinations. The evidence on which recommendations are based is rated. Exceptions to the recommendations are identified. For instance, the authors of the paper on skin cancer screenings indicate that they did not consider studies based on persons with familial skin cancers. Although no recommendation is made for or against skin cancer screenings, ways in which the skin can be assessed during physical examinations performed for other reasons are identified. The importance of individual patient preference is included. The USPSTF panel is multi-disciplinary and includes [table: see text] (http://www.guideline.gov). The statement on aspirin therapy was published in the Annals of Internal Medicine and is available, along with a second article discussing the evidence in more depth (Hayden, Pignone, Phillips, & Mulrow, 2002), at: http://www.annals.org. Print versions are available through the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Publications Clearinghouse (1-800-358-9295). Readers are encouraged to obtain full copies of the recommendations that are applicable to their practice as they become available and to assess their potential application in practice.

Aspirin↗
PubMed2005

Recommendations of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine regarding the impact of implementing the 2004 task group 43 report on dose specification for 103Pd and 125I interstitial brachytherapy.

In March 2004, the recommendations of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) on the interstitial brachytherapy dosimetry using 125I and 103Pd were reported in Medical Physics [TG-43 Update: Rivard et al., 31, 633-674 (2004)]. These recommendations include some minor changes in the dose-calculation formalism and a major update of the dosimetry parameters for eight widely used interstitial brachytherapy sources. A full implementation of these recommendations could result in unintended changes in delivered dose without corresponding revisions in the prescribed dose. Because most published clinical experience with permanent brachytherapy is based upon two widely used source models, the 125I Model 6711 and 103Pd Model 200 sources, in this report we present an analysis of the dosimetric impact of the 2004 TG-43 dosimetry parameters on the history of dose delivery for these two source models. Our analysis indicates that the currently recommended prescribed dose of 125 Gy for Model 200 103Pd implants planned using previously recommended dosimetry parameters [AAPM 103Pd dose prescription: Williamson et al., Med. Phys. 27, 634-642 (2000)] results in a delivered dose of 120 Gy according to dose calculations based on the 2004 TG-43 update. Further, delivered doses prior to October 1997 varied from 113 to 119 Gy for a prescribed dose of 115 Gy compared to 124 Gy estimated by the AAPM 2000 report. For 125I implants using Model 6711 seeds, there are no significant changes (less than 2%). Practicing physicians should take these results into account when selecting the clinically appropriate prescribed dose for 103Pd interstitial implant patients following implementation of the 2004 TG-43 update dose-calculation recommendations. The AAPM recommends that the radiation oncology community review this report and consider whether the currently recommended dose level (125 Gy) needs to be revised.

Anisotropy↗
PubMed2005

The impact of fear appeals on processing and acceptance of action recommendations.

A stage model of processing of fear-arousing communications was tested in an experiment that examined the impact of vulnerability to a severe health risk, the quality of the arguments supporting a protective action recommendation, and the source to which the recommendation was attributed, on processing and acceptance of the recommendation. Argument quality influenced attitudes toward the recommendation (but not intention to act), and this effect was mediated by negative thoughts about the recommendation. Vulnerability influenced intention to act (but not attitudes), and this effect was mediated by perceived threat and positive thoughts about the recommendation. The pattern of findings suggests that although vulnerability to a severe health risk induces biased processing of the recommendation, biased processing is restricted to intentions and does not compromise the evaluation of the recommendation. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2006

Identification, diagnosis, and management of anemia in adult ambulatory patients treated by primary care physicians: evidence-based and consensus recommendations.

OBJECTIVE: Provide recommendations for the identification, diagnosis, and management of ambulatory patients with anemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used to develop the recommendations. A literature review of anemia prevalence (based on a search of PubMed for the period 1990 to 2003), etiology, and treatment outcomes was reviewed by a panel comprised of nine physicians (six primary care, three specialists) who then rated 336 clinical scenarios and grouped them into three categories: 'appropriate', 'uncertain', or 'inappropriate'. RESULTS: Performing a complete blood count on a yearly basis was rated 'appropriate' for patients with an underlying chronic condition, for men > or = 50 years old, and for all women with no chronic condition on an every-5-years basis. Specific recommendations were made for five anemia management options (observation, referral, empiric trial of iron, transfusion, and erythropoietic growth factors). Recommendations for observation alone were based on age, gender, and hemoglobin level. Immediate referral to a gastroenterologist or hematologist for a work-up was rated 'inappropriate' in all cases. An empiric trial of iron was rated 'inappropriate' for women over age 40 and for all men. Recommendations on the use of erythropoietic growth factors were based on hemoglobin level and anemia symptoms ('appropriate' if Hb < 9.5 g/dL, or if Hb = 9.5-11.0 g/dL and anemia symptoms were present). Finally, recommendations about transfusion were based on the severity of anemia and the presence of cardiovascular disease ('appropriate' in patients > or = 70 years old and in those presenting with either symptoms of anemia or underlying cardiovascular disease). The recommendations did not address anemia related to nutritional deficiencies, cancer/chemotherapy, or chronic renal failure. CONCLUSION: Primary care physicians should obtain screening blood counts, perform diagnoses, and manage anemia in patient groups known to be at risk. These recommendations on the identification, diagnosis, and management of anemia represent an opportunity to improve outcomes in ambulatory patients with anemia.

Adolescent↗