Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “adjuvant”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources

Adjuvants for human vaccines--current status, problems and future prospects.

Adjuvants help antigen to elicit an early, high and long-lasting immune response with less antigen, thus saving on vaccine production costs. In recent years, adjuvants received much attention because of the development of purified, subunit and synthetic vaccines which are poor immunogens and require adjuvants to evoke the immune response. With the use of adjuvants immune response can be selectively modulated to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I or MHC class II and Th1 or Th2 type, which is very important for protection against diseases caused by intracellular pathogens such as viruses, parasites and bacteria (Mycobacterium). A number of problems are encountered in the development and use of adjuvants for human vaccines. The biggest issue with the use of adjuvants for human vaccines, particularly routine childhood vaccines, is the toxicity and adverse side-effects of most of the adjuvant formulations. At present the choice of adjuvants for human vaccination reflects a compromise between a requirement for adjuvanticity and an acceptable low level of side-effects. Other problems with the development of adjuvants include restricted adjuvanticity of certain formulations to a few antigens, use of aluminum adjuvants as reference adjuvant preparations under suboptimal conditions, non-availability of reliable animal models, use of non-standard assays and biological differences between animal models and humans leading to the failure of promising formulations to show adjuvanticity in clinical trials. The most common adjuvants for human use today are still aluminum hydroxide and aluminum phosphate, although calcium phosphate and oil emulsions also have some use in human vaccinations. During the last 15 years much progress has been made on development, isolation and chemical synthesis of alternative adjuvants such as derivatives of muramyl dipeptide, monophosphoryl lipid A, liposomes, QS21, MF-59 and immunostimulating complexes (ISCOMS). Other areas in adjuvant research which have received much attention are the controlled release of vaccine antigens using biodegradable polymer microspheres and reciprocal enhanced immunogenicity of protein-polysaccharide conjugates. Biodegradable polymer microspheres are being evaluated for targeting antigens on mucosal surfaces and for controlled release of vaccines with an aim to reduce the number of doses required for primary immunization. Reciprocal enhanced immunogenicity of protein-polysaccharide conjugates will be useful for the development of combination vaccines.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

Influence of adjuvants on the quantity, affinity, isotype and epitope specificity of murine antibodies.

Five adjuvants were compared to Freund's adjuvant for production of mouse polyclonal antibodies and monoclonal antibodies (McAbs) to human serum albumin (HSA) and interleukin-1 alpha (IL-1 alpha). Parameters examined were titer, affinity, concentration, isotype, epitope specificity and neutralizing activity of sera and hybridoma supernatants. Freund's adjuvant, while producing high titers and concentrations of antibodies in sera, was inferior to other adjuvants for eliciting antibodies with particular qualities. The adjuvants Quil A and A1(OH)3/[Thr1]muramyldipeptide elicited the highest affinity antibodies to HSA. Syntex adjuvant formulation-1 (SAF-1) elicited the highest percentage of 'protective' IgG2a antibodies to HSA. All adjuvants, particularly Quil A and Ribi adjuvant system, where superior to Freund's adjuvant in eliciting antibodies which bound native versus denatured HSA. In a comparison of SAF-1 and Freund's adjuvant, SAF-1 was superior to Freund's adjuvant in eliciting polyclonal and hybridoma antibodies which neutralized the biological activity of IL-1 alpha. These results show that adjuvants selectively and independently enhance different qualities of the antibody response. Furthermore, immunization with the appropriate adjuvant can optimize production of McAbs with desired qualities.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

Role of aluminum-containing adjuvants in antigen internalization by dendritic cells in vitro.

An important step in the induction of an immune response to vaccines is the internalization of antigens by antigen presenting cells, such as dendritic cells (DCs). Many current vaccines are formulated with antigens adsorbed to an aluminum-containing adjuvant. Following injection of the vaccine the antigens may either elute or stay adsorbed to the adjuvant surface. Antigens, which elute from the adjuvant surface, are internalized by dendritic cells through macropinocytosis while those that remain adsorbed are internalized with the adjuvant particle by phagocytosis. The relative efficiency of these two routes of internalization was studied. Alpha casein (AC) labeled with a green fluorescent dye was selected as the model antigen. In order to model vaccine antigens that elute from aluminum-containing adjuvants following administration, dendritic cells were incubated with a solution of fluorochrome-labeled alpha casein. To model vaccine antigens that do not elute from aluminum-containing adjuvants following administration, dendritic cells were exposed to fluorochrome-labeled alpha casein adsorbed to aluminum hydroxide adjuvant (AH). Alpha casein has eight phosphate groups and adsorbs to aluminum hydroxide adjuvant through ligand exchange. Alpha casein does not elute from aluminum hydroxide adjuvant upon exposure to cell culture media. The uptake of antigen by dendritic cells was determined at 0.5, 1, 2 and 3h by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. Dendritic cells internalized both alpha casein in solution and alpha casein adsorbed to aluminum hydroxide adjuvant. However, the mean fluorescence intensity of dendritic cells incubated with adsorbed alpha casein was four times greater than dendritic cells incubated with alpha casein in solution. In addition, the internalization of alpha casein was enhanced when the mean aggregate diameter of the adjuvant in the cell culture media was reduced from 17 microm to 3 microm. It was concluded that antigen internalization by dendritic cells was enhanced when the antigen remained adsorbed to the aluminum-containing adjuvant following administration and the aggregate size of the adjuvant was smaller than dendritic cells which are approximately 10 microm in diameter.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

Community-based assessment of adjuvant hormone therapy in women with breast cancer, 1991-1997.

This study used population-based tumor registry data to describe the patterns of adjuvant hormone therapy and to examine the correlates of hormone therapy for women with breast cancer. The study population included 5101 women (age 20 years) who were diagnosed with breast cancer in 1991 through 1997 in the entire state of New Mexico. Overall, 32% of women with stage I, II, or IIIA breast cancer received adjuvant hormone therapy. The likelihood of receiving adjuvant hormone therapy increased with tumor stage at diagnosis. Women less than 50 years of age were significantly less likely to receive adjuvant hormone therapy compared to those age 50 to 54 years, but there was no significant difference in the use of adjuvant hormone therapy for women age 55 years and older. The use of adjuvant hormone therapy was influenced by hormone receptor status and lymph node status. Patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were also more likely to receive adjuvant hormone therapy than those who did not. The use of adjuvant hormone therapy alone was relatively stable over time and the use of adjuvant chemotherapy alone increased, but the receipt of chemotherapy combined with hormone therapy decreased from 1991 to 1997. There was no significant difference with age in the use of adjuvant hormone therapy among 55-year-old women compared to those age 50 to 54 years, whereas women less than 50 years of age were significantly less likely to receive this therapy. The use of adjuvant hormone therapy varied significantly by tumor stage, lymph node status, hormone receptor status, and the receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Age Distribution↗

Twenty-four hour rhythms of hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing hormone, thyrotropin-releasing hormone, growth hormone-releasing hormone and somatostatin in rats injected with Freund's adjuvant.

The effect of Freund's adjuvant injection on 24-hour variation of hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH), GH-releasing hormone (GRH) and somatostatin levels was examined in adult rats kept under light between 0800 and 2000 h daily. Groups of rats receiving Freund's complete adjuvant or its vehicle 3 days before sacrifice were killed at six different time intervals throughout a 24-hour cycle. In the median eminence, adjuvant vehicle-injected rats exhibited significant 24-hour variations for the four hormones examined, with maxima at noon. These 24-hour rhythms were inhibited or suppressed by Freund's adjuvant injection. In the anterior hypothalamus of adjuvant vehicle-treated rats, CRH content peaked at 1600 h, while two peaks were found for TRH and GRH levels, i.e., at 2400-0400 h and 1600 h. Freund's adjuvant injection suppressed 24-hour rhythm of anterior hypothalamic CRH, TRH and GRH content and uncovered a peak in anterior hypothalamic somatostatin levels at 0400 h. In the medial hypothalamus of adjuvant vehicle-treated rats, significant 24-hour variations were detectable for TRH (peaks at 1600 and 2400 h) and somatostatin (peak at 2400 h) which disappeared after Freund's adjuvant injection. In the posterior hypothalamus of adjuvant vehicle-treated rats, two peaks were apparent for CRH, TRH and somatostatin levels, i.e. at 1600 h and 2400-0400 h, this hormonal profile remaining unmodified after Freund's adjuvant administration. The administration of the immunosuppressant drug cyclosporine (5 mg/kg, 5 days) impaired the depressing effect of Freund's adjuvant injection on CRH, TRH and somatostatin content in median eminence, but not that on GRH. In the anterior hypothalamus, cyclosporine generally prevented the effect of immunization on hormone levels an revealed a second maximum in TRH at 0400 h. Cyclosporine also restored 24-hour variations in TRH and somatostatin levels of medial hypothalamus of Freund's adjuvant-injected rats but was unable to modify them in the posterior hypothalamus. The results further support the existence of a significant effect of immune-mediated inflammatory response at an early phase after Freund's adjuvant injection on hypothalamic levels which was partially sensitive to immunosuppression by cyclosporine.

Animals↗

Adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To provide health care providers, patients, and the general public with a current consensus on various issues related to the use of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. PARTICIPANTS: A nonfederal, nonadvocate, 14-member panel representing the fields of oncology, radiology, surgery, pathology, statistics, public health, health policy, and the public; 30 experts in medical oncology, molecular oncology, biostatistics, epidemiology, surgical oncology, and clinical trials who presented data to the consensus panel; a conference audience of approximately 1,000. EVIDENCE: The literature was searched using MEDLINE and an extensive bibliography of references was provided to the panel. Experts prepared abstracts with relevant citations from the literature. Scientific evidence was given precedence over clinical anecdotal experience. CONSENSUS PROCESS: The panel, answering predefined questions, developed their conclusions based on the scientific evidence presented in open forum and the scientific literature. The panel composed a draft statement that was read in its entirety and circulated to the experts and the audience for comment. Thereafter, the panel resolved conflicting recommendations and released a revised statement at the end of the conference. The panel finalized the revisions within a few weeks after the conference. The draft statement was made available on the World Wide Web immediately following its release at the conference and was updated with the panel's final revisions. CONCLUSIONS: During the past 10 years, substantial progress has been made in the treatment of invasive breast cancer. For the first time, breast cancer mortality rates are decreasing in the United States. Refinements of adjuvant treatment have contributed to this advance. Generally accepted prognostic and predictive factors include age, tumor size, lymph node status, histological tumor type, grade, mitotic rate, and hormonal receptor status. Novel technologies, such as tissue and expression microarrays and proteomics, hold exciting potential. Progress, however, will depend on proper design and analysis of clinical and pathological investigations. Decisions regarding adjuvant hormonal therapy should be based on the presence of hormone receptor protein in tumor tissues. Adjuvant hormonal therapy should be offered only to women whose tumors express hormone receptor protein. Because adjuvant polychemotherapy improves survival, it should be recommended to the majority of women with localized breast cancer regardless of nodal, menopausal, or hormone receptor status. The inclusion of anthracyclines in adjuvant chemotherapy regimens produces a small but statistically significant improvement in survival over non-anthracycline-containing regimens. Available data are currently inconclusive regarding the use of taxanes in adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer. The use of adjuvant dose-intensive chemotherapy regimens in high-risk breast cancer and of taxanes in node-negative breast cancer should be restricted to randomized trials. Ongoing studies evaluating these treatment strategies should be supported to determine if they have a role in adjuvant treatment. Studies to date have included few patients older than 70 years. There is a critical need for trials to evaluate the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in these women. There is evidence that women with a high risk of locoregional tumor recurrence after mastectomy benefit from postoperative radiotherapy. This high-risk group includes women with four or more positive lymph nodes or an advanced primary cancer. Currently, the role of post-mastectomy radiotherapy for patients with one to three positive lymph nodes remains uncertain and should be tested in a randomized controlled trial. Individual patients differ in the importance they place on the risks and benefits of adjuvant treatments. Quality-of-life needs to be evaluated in selected randomized clinical trials to examine the impact of the major acute and long-term side effects of adjuvant treatments, particularly premature menopause, weight gain, mild memory loss, and fatigue. Methods to support shared decision-making between patients and their physicians have been successful in trials; they need to be tailored for diverse populations and should be tested for broader dissemination.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

The immunogenicity-enhancing effect of emulsion vaccine adjuvants is independent of the dispersion type and antigen release rate--a revisit of the role of the hydrophile-lipophile balance (HLB) value.

Effective antigen delivery is one of the most important issues in vaccine development. It has been suggested that adjuvant action results from a depot effect by prolonging the duration of the interaction between antigen and cells, and thus is related to the antigen-releasing properties of emulsion adjuvants. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of the dispersion properties of emulsion-type vaccine adjuvants on the immune response with the aim of optimizing vaccine adjuvant formulation. Emulsion-type adjuvants with various dispersion properties of either the oil-in-water or water-in-oil type were prepared using emulsifiers with various hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance (HLB) values. The physicochemical properties of the emulsions, including the conductivity and viscosity, and antigen release rates were then determined. Cell death induced by the vaccine adjuvants was examined in EL4 cells by Annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) staining and flow cytometric analysis. Mice were immunized with or without the adjuvants and the immunogenicity-enhancing effect of the adjuvants determined by measuring antibody production using an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. The conductivity, viscosity, and antigen release rates varied widely among emulsions containing emulsifiers with different HLB values. However, the magnitude of the antigen-specific antibody response was similar in most emulsions adjuvants containing Spans or Tweens. L121-adjuvant, the control adjuvant inducing the strongest apoptosis in vitro, was shown to stimulate the highest antibody response in vivo. The results obtained in this study indicate that the immunogenicity-enhancing effect of emulsion adjuvants is independent of the dispersion type and the antigen release rate of the vaccine delivery system.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

Potentiation of the immune response to non-adsorbed antigens by aluminum-containing adjuvants.

The degree of antigen adsorption by aluminum-containing adjuvants is considered an important characteristic of vaccines that is related to immunopotentiation by the adjuvant. This study examined immunopotentiation by aluminum phosphate adjuvant in three model vaccines in which the antigen was not adsorbed in the vaccine formulation nor when mixed in vitro with interstitial fluid. In the first model vaccine, aluminum phosphate adjuvant was pre-treated with 0.5 M KH2PO4 to minimize the adsorption of dephosphorylated alpha casein. The second model vaccine was composed of aluminum phosphate adjuvant and ovalbumin that was dephosphorylated by treatment with potato acid phosphatase. The third model vaccine consisted of aluminum phosphate adjuvant and lysozyme (LYS). In order to prevent adsorption of lysozyme, the aluminum phosphate adjuvant was pre-treated with fibrinogen, a protein present in interstitial fluid that binds strongly to aluminum phosphate adjuvant. Immunopotentiation was evaluated by measuring antibody production in mice. It was found that all three model vaccines induced antibody titers that were statistically higher than induced by a solution of antigen without adjuvant and similar to vaccines in which the antigens were adsorbed by aluminum phosphate adjuvant. Confocal microscopy experiments suggested that the antigens used in these experiments, even though not adsorbed to the aluminum phosphate adjuvant, were trapped in void spaces within the adjuvant aggregates, resulting in uptake of antigen by dendritic cells.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

Effect of immunological adjuvant combinations on the antibody and T-cell response to vaccination with MUC1-KLH and GD3-KLH conjugates.

A year ago we described a comparison of 19 immunological adjuvants for their ability to augment antibody and T-cell responses against vaccines containing two cancer antigens, GD3 ganglioside and MUC1 peptide, covalently attached to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). As in our previous experience, the saponin fraction QS-21 was the most potent single adjuvant but several other adjuvants also had potent adjuvant activity. Induction of an immune response against cancer antigens is generally difficult because these antigens are autoantigens. To get maximal benefit from the adjuvant component of cancer vaccines we have now tested whether combinations of the optimal adjuvants induced an improved immune response compared to QS-21 alone. Since over the intervening year a new semi-synthetic saponin adjuvant (GPI-0100) containing the dodecylamide derivative of hydrolyzed naturally-occurring saponins had become available, this was tested as well. Twelve different adjuvant combinations and GPI-0100 were compared for their ability to augment (1) antibody responses against GD3 and MUC1 and (2) T-cell responses against GD3, MUC1 and KLH. GPI-0100 and five adjuvant combinations were superior to QS-21 alone for induction of IgM and IgG antibodies against MUC1 and/or GD3: QS-21 plus bacterial nucleotide CpG, QS-21 plus monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL), QS-21 plus non-ionic block copolymer CRL-1005, QS-21 plus Titermax and Titermax plus CpG. Antibody responses were documented both by ELISA against purified antigens and by FACS for cell surface reactivity. There was no evidence for T-cell immunity against GD3 or MUC1. The antibody responses against GD3 and MUC1 were, however, strongly correlated with IFN-gamma release and DTH against KLH. These results demonstrate that combinations of immunological adjuvants are able to augment antibody and T-cell responses to these conjugates beyond that attainable with QS-21 alone, and again confirm the absolute necessity of potent adjuvants or adjuvant combinations for optimal immunogenicity with conjugate vaccines.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

Detoxification of endotoxin by aluminum hydroxide adjuvant.

Langmuir adsorption isotherms of endotoxin and aluminum-containing adjuvants at pH 7.4 and 25 degrees C revealed that aluminum hydroxide adjuvant has a greater adsorption capacity (283 microg/mg Al) and adsorption coefficient (1.3x10(4) ml/miccrog) than aluminum phosphate adjuvant (3.0 microg/mg Al, 0.20 ml/microg). The difference in endotoxin adsorption was related to two adsorption mechanisms: electrostatic attraction and covalent bonding. The isoelectric point (iep) of endotoxin is approximately 2. An electrostatic attractive force will be present with aluminum hydroxide adjuvant (iep=11.4), and an electrostatic repulsive force will operate with aluminum phosphate adjuvant (iep=4.6). Endotoxin contains two phosphate groups in the lipid A portion. Covalent bonding occurs with surface aluminum in aluminum hydroxide adjuvant but is inhibited by surface phosphate in aluminum phosphate adjuvant. In-vitro desorption experiments using components of interstitial fluid showed that endotoxin adsorbed by aluminum hydroxide adjuvant was not desorbed by interstitial anions (5 mM phosphate or 2.7 mM citrate) or interstitial proteins (25 mg albumin/ml). The effect of aluminum-containing adjuvants on the systemic response of Sprague-Dawley rats to a 15 microg/kg subcutaneous dose of endotoxin was determined by measuring the serum concentration of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). TNF-alpha and IL-6 were observed in the group which received an endotoxin solution or endotoxin and aluminum phosphate adjuvant. No TNF-alpha or IL-6 was detected in the group that received endotoxin and aluminum hydroxide adjuvant. Aluminum hydroxide adjuvant detoxifies endotoxin by adsorbing it in the vaccine and then not releasing it in interstitial fluid upon administration.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

Adjuvant polychemotherapy of nonorgan-confined bladder cancer after radical cystectomy revisited: long-term results of a controlled prospective study and further clinical experience.

A total of 83 patients with nonorgan-confined bladder cancer with or without lymph node metastases (tumor stages pT3b, pT4a and/or pN1, pN2) was evaluated in November 1993 for relapse-free and overall survival. All patients underwent radical cystectomy between 1987 and 1991, 38 underwent adjuvant polychemotherapy with methotrexate, vinblastine and cisplatin plus doxorubicin (M-VAC) or epirubicin (M-VEC). Of the 83 patients 49 had entered a prospective randomized trial comparing adjuvant to no adjuvant treatment. The protocol was activated in May 1987. Patient recruitment was concluded in December 1990 because an interim analysis of the 49 randomized patients revealed a significant prognostic advantage in favor of the 26 patients randomized to the chemotherapy group compared to 23 in the control group (p = 0.0015, log-rank test for relapse-free survival curves). Preliminary data were published in 1992. Of the 26 patients randomized for adjuvant chemotherapy 18 were treated with M-VAC or M-VEC, 7 refused chemotherapy before or during cycle 1 and 1 received chemotherapy without cisplatin because of impaired renal function. The update of patient followup obtained in November 1993 continues to demonstrate a significant improvement in progression-free survival in favor of patients randomized for adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.0005). Followup of patients living free of disease ranged from 38 to 78 months. In a second analysis of actual treatment, the total collective of 83 patients treated from 1987 to 1991 was reviewed: 38 who had actually undergone adjuvant M-VAC/M-VEC (18 during the prospective trial and 20 in 1991 as the routinely recommended therapy) were compared with 45 without adjuvant M-VAC/M-VEC (7 refused to participate in the adjuvant trial, 8 randomized for but did not undergo adjuvant M-VAC/M-VEC, 23 belonged to the control group of the trial, and 7 underwent cystectomy in 1991 and remained without adjuvant treatment). This analysis again revealed a significant prognostic advantage in favor of the patients treated with adjuvant M-VAC/M-VEC. We conclude that adjuvant chemotherapy with M-VAC/M-VEC leads to a significant prolongation of relapse-free survival and to an improvement of the definitive cure rates after radical cystectomy for locally advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

Adult↗

Total skin electron beam therapy followed by adjuvant psoralen/ultraviolet-A light in the management of patients with T1 and T2 cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (mycosis fungoides).

PURPOSE: Patients with mycosis fungoides [cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL)] may benefit from adjuvant therapy after completing total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT). We report the results for T1/T2 CTCL patients treated with adjuvant oral psoralen plus ultraviolet light (PUVA) with respect to overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), salvage of recurrence, and toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1974 and 1993, TSEBT was administered to a total of 213 patients with CTCL. Records were reviewed retrospectively, and a total of 114 patients were identified as having T1 or T2 disease. Radiotherapy was provided via a 6-MeV linac to a total of 36 Gy, 1 Gy/day, 4 days/week, for 9 weeks. Beginning in 1988, patients were offered adjuvant PUVA within 2 months of completing TSEBT. This was started at 0.5-2 J/m2, 1-2 treatments/week, with a taper over 3-6 months. Therapy then continued once per month. There were 39 T1 and 75 T2 patients. Six T1 (15%) and eight T2 (11%) patients were treated with adjuvant PUVA. A further 49% of the 114 patients received adjuvant systemic therapy, 3% received spot external beam, 4% received adjuvant ECP, 2% received topical nitrogen mustard, 22% received a combination of therapies exclusive of PUVA, and 9% received no adjuvant therapy. Patients were balanced in all subgroups based on pre-TSEBT therapy. The median age of the cohort was 58 (range 20-88), with a median follow-up time of 62 months (range 3-179). RESULTS: Within 1 month after completing of TSEBT, 97% of T1, and 87% of T2 patients had achieved a complete remission. Stratified by adjuvant therapy, none of six T1 and one of eight T2 patients who received adjuvant PUVA failed within the first 3 years after completion of TSEBT. A total of 43% of the T1 and T2 patients receiving other or no adjuvant treatment failed within the same time course. The 5-year OS for the entire cohort was 85%. Those who received PUVA had a 5-year OS of 100% versus a 5-year OS for the non-PUVA group of 82% (p < 0.10). The 5-year DFS for the entire cohort was 53%. Those who received PUVA had a 5-year DFS of 85% versus a 5-year DFS for the non-PUVA group of 50% (p < 0.02). By T stage, those with T1 receiving PUVA exhibited no relapses, whereas those with T1 not treated with PUVA had a crude relapse rate of 36%. Median DFS was not reached at 103 months for the T1 adjuvant PUVA patients versus 66 months for the non-PUVA patients (p < 0.01). For those with T2, crude relapse rates were 25% and 55%, respectively, with DFS of 60 (median DFS not reached) and 20 months (p < 0.03). The 5-year DFS for patients salvaged with PUVA was 50%. Toxicity of adjuvant and salvage PUVA therapy was acceptable, with only two patients requiring a reduction in PUVA dosage. CONCLUSION: PUVA can maintain remissions in patients with CTCL after TSEBT. There is a significant benefit in DFS but no statistically significant improvement in OS. Prospective, randomized data are needed to confirm these results. PUVA is also effective as a salvage therapy after TSEBT in early-stage patients with recurrence, with acceptable toxicity.

Administration, Oral↗

Adjuvant therapy of primary breast cancer: a review of key findings from the 7th international conference, St. Gallen, February 2001.

Breast cancer research has developed at a rapid pace over the last decades. Recent discoveries promise to provide individualized treatment options, increased long-term survival for women with breast cancer, and the possibility of moving toward curative intent in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Age, race, tumor size, histological tumor type, axillary nodal status, standardized pathological grade, and hormone-receptor status are accepted as established prognostic and/or predictive factors for selection of systemic adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. The role of other promising new factors, such as p53 mutations, HER-2 status, plasminogen activator system, histological evidence of vascular invasion, and quantitative parameters of angiogenesis will be determined in ongoing prospective studies. Currently, 5 years' treatment with adjuvant tamoxifen in women with hormone-positive receptor status, is regarded as the optimal duration of treatment. Long-term follow-up on the randomized trials will determine the added benefit of treatment beyond 5 years. Ovarian ablation has shown a reduction in recurrence and death, and the exact role and extent of adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal women with hormone-responsive tumors is under discussion. Combination hormonal and chemo-hormonal therapies are also being evaluated. There are no convincing data on the survival impact of tamoxifen as a preventative therapy for breast cancer: longer-term follow-up is required, and the planned meta-analyses in 2005 should help shed light on this issue. Statistically significant benefits have been observed with adjuvant chemotherapy (particularly with anthracycline-containing regimens in premenopausal women) versus no adjuvant chemotherapy. The optimal length of adjuvant anthracycline/cyclophosphamide (AC) regimens needs further evaluation as do randomized comparisons of AC to cyclophosphamide/ doxorubicin/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cyclophosphamide/epirubicin/5-FU. Although taxanes promise to provide an additive benefit to adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, the Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9344 and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-28 studies evaluating paclitaxel in the adjuvant setting have not yet demonstrated statistically significant benefits on disease-free survival and overall survival. In the year 2000, all adjuvant therapy studies conducted by the Co-operative Groups in both node-negative and node-positive disease involve a taxane. High-dose chemotherapy evaluations are still ongoing. The numerous prospective adjuvant therapy trials (hormonal; selective estrogen-receptor modulators; aromatase inhibitors; chemotherapy, involving anthracyclines/taxanes/platinum/trastuzumab; biological factors; elderly women (>70 years); high-risk patients; radiotherapy in 1-3 positive lymph nodes), and neoadjuvant studies might further define the chances to enhance cure rates in the treatment of primary breast cancer.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Effect of different adjuvants in equines for the production of equine rabies immunoglobulin.

BACKGROUND: Implementation of the recommended post-exposure prophylaxis by vaccination and specific immunoglobulin therapy for rabies is largely hampered by its high cost and inadequate production. Therefore, the development and availability of an economic preparation of rabies immunoglobulin is a high priority for India, where rabies is a major cause of death. We studied the efficacy of four different adjuvants in raising antibodies to rabies antigen in older, discarded equines. METHODS: Eleven equines, 23-26 years old, were divided into 4 groups to receive four different adjuvants in small amounts (1-2 ml)-Freund complete adjuvant with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Freund complete adjuvant with M. butyricum, Freund incomplete adjuvant and bentonite--along with purified chick embryo cell vaccine. The immunization schedule was spread over 105 days and the antibody titres were measured on days 56, 91 and 119. RESULTS: On day 119 (third sampling), Freund complete adjuvant with M. tuberculosis provided a geometric mean titre of 654.03 IU/ml in comparison with a titre of 459.19 IU/ml with Freund complete adjuvant with M. butyricum, 630.95 IU/ ml with Freund incomplete adjuvant and 172.18 IU/ml with bentonite. CONCLUSION: Purified chick embryo cell vaccine in combination with Freund complete adjuvant containing M. tuberculosis and Freund incomplete adjuvant were better at eliciting an immune response. The low quantity of adjuvants used possibly helped by causing very few side-effects but without compromising the antibody titres.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

Prospective study of adjuvant chemotherapy for pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) have a very poor prognosis, but the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for these patients has not been established. We performed a prospective analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with completely resected pulmonary LCNECs to assess the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: The adjuvant mixture consisted of cisplatin and VP-16 and was administered after surgery to 15 patients with LCNECs from 2000 to 2005. We compared patient survival with historical data for LCNEC patients treated without platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. RESULTS: There were no differences in age, gender, surgical methods, and staging between the adjuvant chemotherapy group and the control group. Median follow-up was 33 months for the adjuvant group and 42 months for the control group. Of the 15 patients in the adjuvant chemotherapy group, 2 patients had disease recurrence and 1 died of interstitial pneumonia. The overall survival rate at 2 and 5 years of patients with adjuvant chemotherapy was 88.9%. The overall survival rate between patients with adjuvant chemotherapy and the historical control group was significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin and VP-16 after surgery appears promising for the improvement of the prognosis for patients with completely resected LCNECs, and it should be evaluated further in larger multi-institutional trials.

Aged↗

Design and selection of vaccine adjuvants: animal models and human trials.

The availability of hundreds of different adjuvants has prompted a need for identifying rational standards for selection of adjuvant formulations based on safety and sound immunological principles for human vaccines. Although many of the mechanisms of adjuvants have been elucidated, meaningful comparisons between different adjuvants derived from in vitro studies, or from studies using adjuvants in rodents or other animals, are often not predictive for safety, adjuvant effects, or vaccine efficacy in humans. A highly efficient and cost-effective method for comparison of adjuvants with a new antigen is to conduct multiple small-scale, phase 1, comparative studies in humans with a new antigen, using adjuvants previously found to be safe with other antigens in human trials. Studies in which highly immunogenic and safe adjuvant formulations have been evaluated in comparative adjuvant trials in humans using a single candidate vaccine antigen against malaria, HIV, and prostate cancer with multiple adjuvants are reviewed.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

Evaluation of the compatibility of a second generation recombinant anthrax vaccine with aluminum-containing adjuvants.

Recombinant protective antigen (rPA) is the active pharmaceutical ingredient in a second generation anthrax vaccine undergoing pre-clinical evaluation. This rPA vaccine differs from the currently licensed vaccine, anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA), in that the sole component is a recombinant form of protective antigen (PA). Unlike AVA the rPA vaccine contains no lethal factor (LF) or edema factor (EF), components of the two bipartite toxins, nor many other Bacillus anthracis-related contaminating proteins that are present in AVA. The proposed clinical protocol involves adsorption of the rPA to an aluminum-based adjuvant. The adsorptive characteristics of rPA and two aluminum-containing adjuvants were examined in a physiological buffer with and without EDTA. Based on the pI of rPA (pI=5.6) and the zero charge point of aluminum hydroxide adjuvant (11.5) and aluminum phosphate adjuvant (4.5), it was predicted and demonstrated that rPA bound in a more efficient manner to aluminum hydroxide adjuvant than to aluminum phosphate adjuvant in the physiological buffer. Binding of the rPA to the aluminum hydroxide adjuvant was decreased by increasing amounts of phosphate in the buffer. The adsorptive capacity for rPA onto aluminum hydroxide adjuvant in the physiological buffer and in water were calculated to be 0.46 mg rPA/mg aluminum in DPBS and 0.73 mg rPA/mg aluminum in water. This study also demonstrated that upon desorption from the aluminum hydroxide adjuvant the rPA was physically intact and free of detectable aggregates. Further, the eluted material was biologically active in an in vitro cytotoxicity assay. Desorption was only possible after an overnight incubation of 2-8 degrees C and not after a room temperature incubation reflecting increased contact with the aluminum hydroxide adjuvant over time. These data suggest that the interaction between rPA and aluminum hydroxide adjuvant is predominantly electrostatic in character.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

Recent developments in adjuvants for vaccines against infectious diseases.

New generation vaccines, particularly those based on recombinant proteins and DNA, are likely to be less reactogenic than traditional vaccines, but are also less immunogenic. Therefore, there is an urgent need for the development of new and improved vaccine adjuvants. Adjuvants can be broadly separated into two classes, based on their principal mechanisms of action; vaccine delivery systems and 'immunostimulatory adjuvants'. Vaccine delivery systems are generally particulate e.g. emulsions, microparticles, iscoms and liposomes, and mainly function to target associated antigens into antigen presenting cells (APC). In contrast, immunostimulatory adjuvants are predominantly derived from pathogens and often represent pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMP) e.g. LPS, MPL, CpG DNA, which activate cells of the innate immune system. Once activated, cells of innate immunity drive and focus the acquired immune response. In some studies, delivery systems and immunostimulatory agents have been combined to prepare adjuvant delivery systems, which are designed for more effective delivery of the immunostimulatory adjuvant into APC. Recent progress in innate immunity is beginning to yield insight into the initiation of immune responses and the ways in which immunostimulatory adjuvants may enhance this process. However, a rational approach to the development of new and more effective vaccine adjuvants will require much further work to better define the mechanisms of action of existing adjuvants. The discovery of more potent adjuvants may allow the development of vaccines against infectious agents such as HIV which do not naturally elicit protective immunity. New adjuvants may also allow vaccines to be delivered mucosally.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗