Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “VACCINATION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources

Clinical evaluation of transmissible gastroenteritis virus vaccines and vaccination procedures for inducing lactogenic immunity in sows.

Two federally licensed attenuated live transmissible gastroenteritis (TGE) virus vaccines (an IM vaccine and an oral-IM vaccine) and 1 nonlicensed nonattenuated live TGE virus vaccine were evaluated and compared in sows free of TGE virus-neutralizing antibodies. Litters from the sows were challenge exposed at 3 and 5 days of age, and results were combined according to the vaccine administered to the sows. The survivability of pigs suckling sows vaccinated with the nonattenuated vaccine was significantly (P less than 0.01) greater than that of pigs suckling sows vaccinated with the IM attenuated vaccine, significantly (P less than 0.05) greater than that of pigs suckling sows vaccinated with the oral-IM attenuated vaccine, and significantly (P less than 0.05) greater than that of pigs suckling sows that had not been vaccinated. The differences, however, between survivability of litters from sows vaccinated with the IM attenuated vaccine or the oral-IM attenuated vaccine and that of litters from the sows not vaccinated were not significant (P greater than 0.10). The nonattenuated TGE vaccine, although giving a higher level of protection than the attenuated vaccine, was eventually overwhelmed. Dexamethasone did not increase the incidence of diarrhea, and levamisole did not potentiate the lactogenic immunity in sows after given their first dose of the nonattenuated vaccine. Survivability in litters suckling sows that developed diarrhea after given their first dose of the nonattenuated vaccine was not greater than that in litters suckling sows that did not develop diarrhea. The best results were obtained when 3-day-old suckling pigs were challenge exposed with virulent TGE virus.

Animals↗

Haemophilus influenzae b-vaccination: the urgency for timely vaccination.

UNLABELLED: In Germany the annual number of systemic Haemophilus influenzae cases in unvaccinated children aged 3-60 months has recently been exceeded by the number of cases in children vaccinated at least once with the PRP-D, HbOC or OMP vaccines, which until 1995 have almost exclusively been used for H. influenzae b (Hib) vaccination. Most of the vaccinated children however could already have had more vaccinations at onset of disease. How much does an age-related suboptimal vaccination status increase the risk for systemic H. influenzae infections? A case control study was performed in West Germany. Cases with systemic H. influenzae infections were ascertained between 7/92 and 8/ 94 with an ongoing active hospital surveillance programme. Six age-matched population controls per case were recruited at random. Only vaccinated cases and controls were included in the study. The main exposure analysed in this study was suboptimal vaccination at censoring; for censoring ages (age at disease onset in cases and corresponding age in matched controls) > 6 months: one vaccination in 1st year only; > 18 months: two (three for combined vaccines with Hib + DT or DPT in one syringe) vaccinations in the 1st year of life but no booster vaccination. Suboptimal vaccination for age increased the risk for systemic H. influenzae infections by a factor of 4.74 (95%-CI 2.17-10.34). Following adjustment for confounders the odds ratio was 4.39 (95%-CI 1.74-11.07). Subgroup analyses showed that this risk was not related to the type of vaccine used. The risk for "no booster vaccination" in children aged > 18 months appeared even greater than the risk associated with one vaccination in the 1st year only. CONCLUSIONS: On schedule and complete Hib vaccinations are essential for an optimal effectiveness of Hib vaccination programmes. Booster vaccinations between 12 and 18 months are important if the PRP-D, HbOC and OMP vaccines are used for primary vaccination.

Analysis of Variance↗

Adherence of mass vaccinators to timing guidelines for influenza vaccination.

BACKGROUND: With recent delays in influenza vaccine availability, practitioners have been encouraged to time vaccination activities to promote vaccination of high-priority groups first. This cross-sectional survey of persons vaccinated in nontraditional settings (NTS) by mass vaccinators was conducted to assess how effectively the mass vaccinators were able to implement these vaccination-timing guidelines. METHODS: In Minnesota, the Minnesota Visiting Nurse Agency (MVNA) is a major mass vaccinator in NTS. For the 2001-2002 vaccination season, MVNA developed several strategies designed to facilitate adherence to vaccination timing guidelines adopted by the Minnesota Department of Health. All persons vaccinated in the MVNA NTS clinics from October 2001 through December 2001 were surveyed in order to evaluate whether they were in a high-priority group and whether the timing of their vaccinations coincided with the timing promoted in the guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 46,174 of the 145,947 people vaccinated by the MVNA were vaccinated between October 14 and October 28, 2001, the time period designated for vaccination of high-priority groups. Of these, 41,143 (89%) responded to the priority group question and 27,211 (66%) indicated that they were in one of the targeted groups, including more than 19,000 Medicare recipients. At sites targeting senior citizens, more than 92% of initial vaccine recipients were in a targeted group. Overall, 48.4% of persons vaccinated at any time during the vaccination season were in a high-priority group. CONCLUSIONS: Mass vaccinators can successfully implement influenza vaccination timing guidelines in NTS.

Cross-Sectional Studies↗

Comparative efficacy of an injectable vaccine and an intranasal vaccine in stimulating Bordetella bronchiseptica-reactive antibody responses in seropositive dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare antibody responses to intranasal and SC Bordetella bronchiseptica vaccines in seropositive dogs. DESIGN: Randomized controlled study. ANIMALS: 40 young adult Beagles vaccinated against B bronchiseptica. PROCEDURE: Dogs were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups (intranasal vaccine, SC vaccine, intranasal and SC vaccines, no vaccine) and vaccinated on day 0. Serum and salivary B bronchiseptica-reactive antibody responses were measured on days 0 through 7, 10, 14, 21, and 28. RESULTS: Dogs that were vaccinated with the SC vaccine, alone or in combination with the intranasal vaccine, had a significant increase in serum concentration of B bronchiseptica-reactive IgG beginning on day 5 and persisting through day 28. Dogs that were vaccinated with the intranasal vaccine alone had a significant increase in serum concentration of B bronchiseptica-reactive IgG beginning on day 10 and persisting through day 28, but serum IgG concentration in these dogs was significantly less than concentration in dogs that received the SC vaccine. Neither vaccine had a demonstrable effect on salivary concentrations of B bronchiseptica-reactive IgA or IgG. On day 10, all vaccinated groups had significantly higher serum IgA concentrations than did unvaccinated control dogs. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results suggest that the SC B bronchiseptica vaccine may be used to stimulate antibody responses in seropositive dogs. There was no apparent benefit to administering these vaccines simultaneously. Intranasal vaccines may not be effective for booster vaccination of dogs previously exposed to or immunized against B bronchiseptica. Dogs should be vaccinated at least 5 days prior to exposure to B bronchiseptica.

Administration, Intranasal↗

Immunogenicity and safety of an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine administered concomitantly with diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis and haemophilus influenzae type B vaccines to children less than 2 years of age.

OBJECTIVE: The availability of a hepatitis A virus vaccine for infant and early childhood immunization could reduce the transmission of hepatitis A virus in the United States. This study evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of a hepatitis A virus vaccine (Havrix, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium) administered concomitantly with diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccines to children < 2 years. METHODS: In this open, comparative, multicenter study, 1084 healthy children aged 11 to 25 months were allocated (4:4:3:3:4 ratio) to 5 treatment groups based on age and previous vaccination history. Subjects 11 to 13 months of age received 2 doses of hepatitis A virus vaccine 6 months apart (N = 243). Subjects aged 15 to 18 months received 2 doses of hepatitis A virus vaccine 6 months apart (N = 241); or hepatitis A virus vaccine, diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis, and H influenzae type b at month 0 and the second dose of hepatitis A virus vaccine 6 months later (N = 183); or diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis and H influenzae type b at month 0 and hepatitis A virus vaccine at months 1 and 7 (N = 175). Subjects 23 to 25 months of age received hepatitis A virus vaccine at months 0 and 6 (N = 242). Immune responses were measured at baseline and 30 days after vaccine doses, and solicited and unsolicited adverse events were collected. RESULTS: After 2 doses of hepatitis A virus vaccine, all of the subjects in all of the groups were seropositive. Coadministration of hepatitis A virus vaccine with diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis and H influenzae type b vaccines did not impact the immunogenicity of the 3 vaccines, except for the antipertussis toxoid vaccine response, which was slightly decreased. Hepatitis A virus vaccine was well tolerated in children 11 to 25 months of age. CONCLUSION: The administration of 2 doses of hepatitis A virus vaccine on a 0- and 6-month schedule starting at 11 to 13 months of age or at 15 to 18 months of age was as immunogenic and well tolerated as the administration of 2 doses in children 2 years of age. Immune responses to diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis and H influenzae type b either given alone or coadministered with hepatitis A virus vaccine were similar except for antipertussis toxoid response.

Antibody Formation↗