Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Universal Health Insurance”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Rekindling reform--how goes business?

Employers were a major cause of the failure of President Clinton's Health Security bill. This did not have to be so. The substantive and political factors that caused employers to turn against the Clinton Plan could prove instructive in the next reform effort. The unwillingness of employers who do provide benefits to engage seriously in the struggle over health care reform contributes to maintaining the status quo that penalizes them while rewarding employers who fail to provide coverage. The lessons that can be learned from the Clinton Plan debate, if heeded by both employers and health reform advocates, raise hope that key elements of the business community can play a positive role in the next comprehensive health reform effort.

Commerce↗
PubMed2004

Towards advanced risk-sharing in health care financing: with a focus on the potential of social health insurance in developing countries.

In this paper, we analyse the major health financing methods and the contribution they can make to improving access to health care among all of a country's population groups. Risk-sharing in health financing is proposed as a powerful method to achieve this improvement. The larger the degree of risk-sharing in a health financing system, the less people will have to bear the financial consequences of their own health risks, and the more they are likely to have access to needed care. Ideally countries should attempt to introduce 'advanced' risk-sharing aiming at equal access among individuals to an adequate package of health services. There are two major ways to implement advanced risk-sharing: general tax revenue may be main source of financing health services, or else social health insurance may be established. An important finding is that about 60% of the world's countries still need to pursue efforts towards the introduction of advanced risk-sharing. We further focus on the potential of social health insurance as an advanced risk-sharing method. In fact, there is recent interest in developing countries such as Côte d'Ivoire, Indonesia, Iran and Kenya in this particular health financing mechanism. Compared to health financing via general tax revenue, social health insurance spreads the immediate burden of financing among various groups, including the workers, the self-employed, enterprises and Government. Time and tedious discussions between these groups may be needed, however, before a consensus is reached, not only on the relative burden of financing but also on ways to achieve overall population coverage. It is suggested that action-research be used to test the adequacy of initial social health insurance policies.

Delivery of Health Care↗
PubMed1992

Cost inflation and resource distribution in the Korean healthcare sector under national insurance.

In 1989, Korea finally implemented a universal national health insurance policy. However, the expansion in coverage has created a number of ongoing problems: a rapid demand-pull inflation in medical costs stimulated by the fee-for-service payment system and an increasing maldistribution of available resources. The author discusses the sources of these problems and provides a taxonomy of possible methods to bring them under control.

Cost Control↗
PubMed1984

The Canadian health care system: an overview.

Although health care is a provincial responsibility in Canada, universal hospital insurance was fully adopted by 1961; universal medical insurance followed 10 years later. Each province enacted universal insurance after the federal government offered to pay 50% of provincial hospital and medical care costs. Hospital insurance had wide public and provider support but universal medical care insurance was opposed by organized medicine. The federal government soon realized that it had no control over total expenditures and no mechanisms for controlling costs. In 1977 it enacted Bill C-37 which limited total federal contributions and made those contributions independent of provincial health care expenditures so that increased costs had to be met by the provinces. Since private health care insurance for universal benefits is prohibited by the federal terms of reference for health insurance, the provinces must raise the money by taxes and (in some provinces) premiums. Although prohibited by the terms of reference of the universal program, some provinces have adopted hospital user fees and are allowing their physicians to bill patients in excess of provincial fee schedules. The 1980s have seen increased confrontations between the federal and provincial governments and between the provinces and their providers. The issues are cost containment and control of the system. The provinces have two broad options. The first is more private funding through private insurance and user fees. The proposed new Canada Health Act will probably prohibit such charges. A second option involves greater control and management of the system by the provinces; this has already occurred in Quebec. Greater control is vigorously opposed by physicians and hospitals. The Canadian solution to health insurance problems in the past has been moderation. Extreme moves in either direction would represent a break with tradition, but they may prove to be unavoidable.

Canada↗
PubMed2004

"What's in, what's out": stakeholders' views about the boundaries of Medicare.

The Canada Health Act requires that provincial insurance plans provide universal coverage without co-payments for all "medically necessary" services delivered by hospitals and doctors, but allows care delivered by other providers in other locations to fall outside of the boundaries of Medicare. Discussion about the sustainability of medicare at both the national and provincial levels has called for the revisiting of these boundaries. The M-THAC (Medicare to Home and Community) Research Unit attempted to clarify the areas of consensus and controversy as to what key stakeholders thought should be "in" or "out" of Medicare. Using a non-experimental, cross-sectional design, a self-administered survey (in both English and French, constructed in consultation with our partners) was distributed between January and April 2002 to policy elites of key stakeholder groups. The results are based on 2,523 responses. Much of the current "debate" is mired in discussing issues where consensus already exists. We found strong support for in-hospital care. However, there is considerable resistance, across all groups, to full funding for similar services in private clinics or in the home, and almost no support for full funding for non-medical home-based services. The vision of many policy elites remains heavily linked to the current system of guaranteed public funding only for acute care in hospitals or by physicians. Successful reform will need to address, rather than assume, a broader view of healthcare.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2004

Universal health coverage in Thailand: ideas for reform and policy struggling.

Inequality in health between rich and poor in Thailand was well documented; millions of informal workers and their families lacked health insurance; and the poor paid more proportionately in income for health care. The universal coverage is conceived as one of the means to redress the situation. But the term 'universal coverage' may mean differently among different groups of stakeholders. This paper, based on empirical research of health policy reform, collected perceptions and ideas from stakeholders and discusses the ways and strategies that universal coverage might take shape in Thailand. Two sources of information were taken: one from the questionnaire survey (according to the Delphi technique, two rounds of survey were taken), another an in-depth interview. Obtained information for policy formulation included how best, as conceived by stakeholders, to implement the universal coverage, sources of finance, fiscal implication for Thai government, ways to prevent higher demand for unnecessary services, and involvement of local government. Recent policy move in Thailand (the so-called 30 baht for all diseases) emerged in 2001 generated hot debate nationwide. The programme is currently in its early phase and is likely to evolve overtime--i.e. whether or not this programme will be financed by certain types of taxes or from annual government expense still unclear; and budget allocation among different health providers still unsettled. Anyhow this programme may be interpreted as a policy shift away from the pro-market based toward a government-supported egalitarianism.

Attitude to Health↗
PubMed2003

Affordable health insurance for all is possible by means of a pragmatic approach.

America can attain affordable health insurance coverage for all by using a pragmatic approach. Such an effort must accommodate the realities of the American health care system and resist the temptation to propose radical restructuring. The congressional strategy for universal health care described here was developed by the American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine. It builds on the strengths of the current pluralistic system by combining the benefits of public health plans such as Medicaid and the State Children's Health Insurance Program with a more competitive and affordable private insurance market. The health care system has reached a crisis point. Allowing the status quo to continue courts certain disaster.

Health Care Reform↗