Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Transfer learning”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

The basis of transfer in artificial grammar learning.

In two experiments, we examined the extent to which knowledge of sequential dependencies and/or patterns of repeating elements is used during transfer in artificial grammar learning. According to one view of transfer, learners abstract the grammar's sequential dependencies and then learn a mapping to new vocabulary at test (Dienes, Altmann, & Gao, 1999). Elements that are repeated have no special status on this view, and so a logical prediction is that learners should transfer as well after exposure to a grammar without repetitions as after exposure to a grammar with them. On another view, repetition structure is the very basis of transfer (Brooks & Vokey, 1991; Mathews & Roussel, 1997). Learners were trained on grammars with or without repeating elements to test these competing views. Learners demonstrated considerable knowledge of sequential dependencies in their training vocabulary but did not use such knowledge to transfer to a new vocabulary. Transfer only occurred in the presence of repetition structure, demonstrating this to be the basis of transfer.

Humans↗
PubMed1996

Transfer and retention of implicit and explicit learning.

Two parallel tasks involving rule learning were used to assess implicit and explicit learning. The complex task (occurring in the complex rule-line condition) involves predominantly implicit learning, and the simple task (occurring in the simple rule-number condition) requires primarily explicit learning. Implicit learning clearly showed negative transfer from previous implicit learning experience, whereas explicit learning showed strong positive transfer. Subjects' explicit knowledge declined and implicit knowledge remained at the same level when retested one week later. The results are discussed in terms of principles guiding the learning and transfer of explicit and implicit knowledge. This is consistent with the assertion that implicit and explicit learning involve two functionally different learning systems.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1991

Rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) complex learning skills reassessed.

Results from three experiments on basic learning and transfer in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) are reported in which fully automated testing paradigms, afforded by the Language Research Center's Computerized Test System (LRC-CTS), were employed. Performance levels for discrimination learning set, transfer index, and mediational-learning testing were uniformly higher than was predicted from the literature, in contrast to previous reports of compromised learning under similar conditions (automated apparatus, planimetric stimuli, spatial discontiguity between stimuli and response loci). Analyses reveal relatively advanced learning set performance, transfer-index ratios, and positive transfer of learning even at stringent criterion levels. Moreover, the data suggest that rhesus monkeys tested in these experiments exhibit mediational instead of associative learning strategies, as do great apes and in contrast to previous reports of rhesus learning. We argue that the LRC-CTS enhances learning by nonhuman primate subjects, obviating those factors, reported in the literature from experiments in which manual or other automated systems were employed, that compromise learning.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Abstract analogies and positive transfer in artificial grammar learning.

Following Brooks and Vokey (1991), we show that positive transfer to new items generated from an artificial grammar in which the vocabulary has been changed from training to test can be based on "abstract analogy" to specific training items (specific similarity) rather than abstraction of a grammar and symbol remapping rules, even with remapping unique to each test item. The results confirm that transcendence over symbols provides no support for the implicit learning of abstract structure. Ironically, they also show that the effect of specific similarity does not depend on surface characteristics of the items, but the residual effect of grammaticality does.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMedDate not supplied

All other things being equal: acquisition and transfer of the control of variables strategy.

The ability to design unconfounded experiments and make valid inferences from their outcomes is an essential skill in scientific reasoning. The present study addressed an important issue in scientific reasoning and cognitive development: how children acquire a domain-general processing strategy (Control of Variables Strategy or CVS) and generalize it across various contexts. Seven- to 10-year-olds (N = 87) designed and evaluated experiments and made inferences from the experimental outcomes. When provided with explicit training within domains, combined with probe questions, children were able to learn and transfer the basic strategy for designing unconfounded experiments. Providing probes without direct instruction, however, did not improve children's ability to design unconfounded experiments and make valid inferences. Direct instruction on CVS not only improved the use of CVS, but also facilitated conceptual change in the domain because the application of CVS led to unconfounded, informative tests of domain-specific concepts. With age, children increasingly improved their ability to transfer learned strategies to remote situations. A trial-by-trial assessment of children's strategy use also allowed the examination of the source, rate, path, and breadth of strategy change.

Awareness↗
PubMed1994

The nature and processes of preverbal learning: implications from nine-month-old infants' discrimination problem solving.

Nine-month-old infants' performance on discrimination-learning problems was investigated in four experiments using the synchronous reinforcement paradigm. These experiments were organized around basic theoretical postulates concerning the relation between attention and learning. In each of the experiments, infants were trained to respond differentially to a particular stimulus feature, with the goal of establishing whether they could learn to respond to a particular stimulus feature under conditions where other stimulus dimensions were present and varying. In the first experiment, 48 infants were trained to fixate visually on a particular feature in a pair of stimuli that varied in color, form, and position dimensions. Contingencies for responding were then shifted either within a dimension (reversal shift) or across dimensions (nonreversal shift). Infants learned to respond to the reinforced feature during initial training; moreover, infants assigned to a reversal shift condition showed a higher level of transfer of learning during the test phase than those assigned to a nonreversal shift condition. The second experiment extended the results of Experiment 1 by testing 48 additional infants under conditions in which the number of varying irrelevant dimensions was increased during the shift phase. Although the difficulty added to this task by this manipulation made transfer more difficult for all infants, results again indicated that transfer of learning was more evident for infants in a reversal shift than a nonreversal shift condition. In the third experiment, 64 infants were trained in a similar manner, except that completely new values were substituted during shift phases on the color and form dimensions. This manipulation was meant to probe whether infants were formulating a dimension response from previous training and to test the predictions of such dimension processing for transfer of learning to a functionally new problem. Infants were reinforced for fixating on a new feature either within the same dimension as during training (intradimension shift) or within the dimension that was not originally trained (extradimension shift). Transfer of learning was clearly superior in the intradimension shift condition. The findings of the first three experiments suggested that, during discrimination-learning problems, infants selected and tested individual stimulus features and dimensions from an array of potential solutions to the problem until discovering the one that was consistently associated with reinforcement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Intermanual transfer effects in sequential tactuomotor learning: evidence for effector independent coding.

Results from our earlier brain imaging studies regarding motor learning have shown different areas activated during naive and practiced performance. When right handed participants moved a pen either with the dominant or non-dominant hand continuously through a cut-out maze as quickly and accurately as possible, practice resulted in decreased brain activity in right premotor and parietal areas as well as left cerebellum, while increased activity was found in the supplementary motor area (SMA). These lateralized practiced-related changes in brain activation suggest effector-independent abstract coding of information. To test this hypothesis more extensively, intermanual transfer of learning was examined in 24 male and female participants (12 right- and 12 left-handed) using the same maze-learning task. It was hypothesized that if an abstract representation of the movement is learned and stored, intermanual transfer effects should be more pronounced when participants transferred to a same maze as opposed to a mirror image of the maze. Errors and velocity were measured during the following conditions: initial naive performance (Naive); after practice on the maze (Prac); during intermanual transfer to the same maze (Transfer Identical); and to the mirror maze (Transfer Mirror). Transfer direction was tested from the dominant to non-dominant hand and vice versa. No significant differences were found between right- and left-handed participants, males and females, and transfer directions. However, intermanual transfer of learning was significantly greater to the identical maze as opposed to the mirror maze. These results showed that learning was indeed taking place at an abstract effector independent level.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Generalization of motor learning based on multiple field exposures and local adaptation.

Previous studies have used transfer of learning over workspace locations as a means to determine whether subjects code information about dynamics in extrinsic or intrinsic coordinates. Transfer has been observed when the torque associated with joint displacement is similar between workspace locations-rather than when the mapping between hand displacement and force is preserved-which is consistent with muscle- or joint-based encoding. In the present study, we address the generality of an intrinsic coding of dynamics and examine how generalization occurs when the pattern of torques varies over the workspace. In two initial experiments, we examined transfer of learning when the direction of a force field was fixed relative to an external frame of reference. While there were no beneficial effects of transfer after training at a single location (experiments 1 and 2), excellent performance was observed at the center of the workspace after training at two lateral locations (experiment 2). Experiment 3 and associated simulations assessed the characteristics of this generalization. In these studies, we examined the patterns of transfer observed after adaptation to force fields that were composed of two subfields that acted in opposite directions. The experimental and simulated data are consistent with the idea that information about dynamics is encoded in intrinsic coordinates. The nervous system generalizes dynamics learning by interpolating between sets of control signals, each locally adapted to different patterns of torques.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed2000

Absence of interhemispheric transfer of unilateral visuomotor learning in young children and individuals with agenesis of the corpus callosum.

This study was undertaken to investigate the role of the corpus callosum in interhemispheric transfer of unilateral visuomotor learning. In the first experiment, the cross-manual performance of 4 callosal agenesis participants was compared to that of 4 age- and IQ-matched controls. In the second experiment, normal children of different ages (6-7 and 11-12 years) and adults were submitted to the same task to assess the impact of callosal maturation on interhemispheric transfer. Participants had to make aiming movements from a starting position toward either a central or a lateral target on the same side as the hand used, while maintaining central fixation. Prior to training, a pretest was performed with the hand contralateral to the hand used during learning. Participants were then submitted to a posttest with the untrained hand. All participants learned the unilateral aiming task in the learning phase, as evidenced by a reduction in spatial errors with an increasing number of practice trials. However, acallosal participants and children aged 6 to 7 years failed to transfer the acquired skill from the trained to the untrained hemisphere. These findings suggest that interhemispheric transfer of visuomotor skills cannot be assumed by other structures in the case of agenesis or morphological immaturity of the corpus callosum. The results further indicate that unilateral visuomotor learning leads to the formation of a single, unihemispheric engram in the absence, whether functional or anatomical, of the corpus callosum.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

The effects of sequence structure and reward schedule on serial reaction time learning in the monkey.

This research tests the hypothesis that sequence learning performance in non-human primates will be modulated both by the structure of the sequences to be learned and by the schedule of reward applied during learning. Sequence learning in humans has been extensively explored with serial reaction time (SRT) protocols where learning is revealed by reduced reaction times for stimuli presented in repeating sequences vs. stimuli presented in random series. The SRT protocol has been used to demonstrate that different types of sequential structure may be learned under different awareness conditions. Here, we consider surface and abstract structure of sensorimotor sequences such that sequences ABCBAC and DEFEDF (where A to F correspond to spatial locations on a touch sensitive screen) have different serial order or surface structure, but share the same abstract structure 123213, and are thus considered isomorphic. In four experiments, we manipulated the type of sequential structure to be learned, and the schedule of reward in spatial sequence learning tasks. Both of the two monkeys tested demonstrated significant SRT learning for serial order or surface structure, while they failed to learn and transfer abstract structure. Their learning performance was also modulated by the schedule of reward. These results are in support of our hypothesis and are discussed in the context of existing models of sensorimotor sequence learning.

Animals↗