Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “TASTE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Role of saliva in the maintenance of taste sensitivity.

Saliva is the principal fluid component of the external environment of the taste receptor cells and, as such, could play a role in taste sensitivity. Its main role includes transport of taste substances to and protection of the taste receptor. In the initial process of taste perception, saliva acts as a solvent for taste substances; salivary water dissolves taste substances, and the latter diffuse to the taste receptor sites. During this process, some salivary constituents chemically interact with taste substances. For example, salivary buffers (e.g., bicarbonate ions) decrease the concentration of free hydrogen ions (sour taste), and there are some salivary proteins which may bind with bitter taste substances. Another effect of saliva on taste transduction is that some salivary constituents can continuously stimulate the taste receptor, resulting in an alteration of taste sensitivity. For example, the taste detection threshold for NaCl is slightly above the salivary sodium concentrations with which the taste receptor is continuously stimulated. In contrast, saliva protects the taste receptor from damage brought about by dryness and bacterial infection, and from disuse atrophy via a decrease in transport of taste stimuli to the receptor sites. This is a long-term effect of saliva that may be related to taste disorders. These various effects of saliva on the taste perception differ depending on the anatomical relationship between the taste buds and oral openings of the ducts of the salivary glands. Many taste buds are localized in the trenches of the foliate and circumvallate papillae, where the lingual minor salivary glands (von Ebner's glands) secrete saliva. Taste buds situated at the surface of the anterior part of the tongue and soft palate are bathed with the mixed saliva secreted mainly by the three major salivary glands.

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Morphometric and immunocytochemical assessment of fungiform taste buds after interruption of the chorda-lingual nerve.

Unilateral interruption of the chorda-lingual nerve led to a loss of most epithelial axons and to the deterioration of fungiform taste buds in the anterior portion of the tongue of albino rats, mongolian gerbils, and golden hamsters. By three weeks after surgery the following percentages of fungiform taste buds had completely disappeared: 71% in gerbils, 28% in rats, and 26% in hamsters. Residual taste buds were classified into two groups: atrophic taste buds and taste bud remnants. Atrophic taste buds were smaller than normal and typically had no visible taste pore, although they retained the characteristic oval shape of a taste bud and numerous elongated cells. Taste bud remnants were non-oval fragments of taste buds with few elongated cells. Specific markers for elongated taste cells (monoclonal antibodies to keratin 19) confirmed that atrophic taste buds, as well as some taste bud remnants, had elongated taste cells. By 180 days after chorda-lingual nerve transection, 44% of rat fungiform taste buds had disappeared; morphometric analysis of the 311 residual taste buds established that 241 atrophic taste buds and 69 taste bud remnants were, respectively, 50% and 75% smaller than the average volume of 480 normal taste buds. The aggregate loss of gustatory tissue, calculated from the shrinkage of residual taste buds and the volume lost by the outright disappearance of many taste buds, was 88% for gerbils, 72% for rats, and 65% for hamsters. Evaluation in gerbils of the co-occurrence of taste buds and axons suggests residual taste buds were neurotrophically supported. Every gerbil fungiform papilla that lacked axons lacked a taste bud.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Taste. Robust across the age span?

The prevalence of taste loss over a discrete area of the tongue or palate is unknown; however, we have identified discrete losses in three etiological groups: head trauma, upper respiratory infection, and bulimia. We have now identified discrete losses in elderly subjects. To summarize, elderly subjects show elevated taste thresholds for some taste stimuli. Mild dysgeusia may act as a masking stimulus that makes taste thresholds appear to be elevated, and this may be more common in the elderly than the young. Discrete taste losses occur more often among the elderly than the young but usually go unnoticed (although these losses may contribute to elevated thresholds when the test procedure stimulates an area of loss). When the samples are at high concentrations, when the subject judges total intensity rather than typical quality, and when the whole mouth is used to do the tasting, the taste responses of elderly subjects look much like those of the young. Two factors contribute to the failure of people to notice localized taste loss. First, there appear to be mutually inhibitory connections between various taste loci such that if taste input from one area is blocked, the inhibition from that area is also blocked. This results in increases in perceived taste from the other areas. Second, a blank spot for taste can go unnoticed because taste is poorly localized. We can demonstrate this with an illusion. If a taste solution is painted from an area with receptors into an area that does not have receptors, the taste sensation seems to invade the area with no receptors. We suggest that a similar phenomenon may occur with areas from which receptors are lost. This localization illusion could then prevent a subject from noticing that an area has lost taste function. The discovery of discrete taste losses in a population of elderly subjects suggests that earlier failures to find substantial taste losses with age may reflect the redundancy of the taste system. This possibility raises the question of what functions taste subserves that require this kind of redundancy. The taste system appears to be "hard wired" to maintain the constancy of perceived intensity even if substantial taste areas are damaged. This constancy suggests that taste is serving important biological functions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1984

Taste responses of cortical neurons.

Branches of the facial, glossopharyngeal and vagus nerves which synapse with the receptor cells in the taste buds convey taste messages to the rostral part of the nucleus of the solitary tract. The second relay nucleus for ascending taste input is the parabrachial nucleus of the pons. The third relay nucleus is the medial parvocellular component of the ventrobasal complex of the thalamus. This thalamic nucleus projects to the cortical taste area. Another ascending projection site of the parabrachial nucleus is to the lateral hypothalamus, amygdala and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. In monkeys, neurons from the gustatory area of the solitary nucleus directly reach the thalamic taste area, bypassing the parabrachial nucleus. Taste-elicited reflex activities are based on a hedonic (acceptable or rejective) aspect of taste, and are basically determined in the brain stem without activation of cortical neurons. The cerebral cortical taste area is located dorsal to the rhinal sulcus in or near the insular cortex in different species of animals. Besides this taste area, taste inputs also project to the tongue tactile area of the SI in monkeys, cats and rats. Taste-responsive neurons in SI area are also responsive to light tactile stimulation of the tongue. Human clinical case reports suggest that discrimination or recognition of taste quality are processed in the cortical taste area. In animal experiments, it is difficult to determine the functional significance of this area. However, recent behavioral studies using the conditioned taste aversion technique in rats suggest that the cortical taste area plays an important role in cognitive (learning, memorial, associative and discriminative) processes of taste sensation. Summated cortical evoked potentials have been recorded in human and rats to electrical and taste stimulations applied to the tongue surface. Recording of gustatory primary evoked potentials is unsuccessful in human subjects. The responses to taste stimulation are composed of an early component, which is induced by mechanical stimulation of a test solution poured on the tongue surface and a slow component, which is assumed to be the gustatory response. Essentially similar results are obtained for cortical summated responses to taste stimuli in rats. Besides these averaged evoked potentials, arousal changes of EEG occur in response to taste stimulation. There is a possibility that the arousal response can be used an objective indicator for intensity and hedonics of perceived taste sensation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Afferent Pathways↗
PubMed2007

Qualitative and quantitative differences between taste buds of the rat and mouse.

BACKGROUND: Numerous electrophysiological, ultrastructural, and immunocytochemical studies on rodent taste buds have been carried out on rat taste buds. In recent years, however, the mouse has become the species of choice for molecular and other studies on sensory transduction in taste buds. Do rat and mouse taste buds have the same cell types, sensory transduction markers and synaptic proteins? In the present study we have used antisera directed against PLCbeta2, alpha-gustducin, serotonin (5-HT), PGP 9.5 and synaptobrevin-2 to determine the percentages of taste cells expressing these markers in taste buds in both rodent species. We also determined the numbers of taste cells in the taste buds as well as taste bud volume. RESULTS: There are significant differences (p < 0.05) between mouse and rat taste buds in the percentages of taste cells displaying immunoreactivity for all five markers. Rat taste buds display significantly more immunoreactivity than mice for PLCbeta2 (31.8% vs 19.6%), alpha-gustducin (18% vs 14.6%), and synaptobrevin-2 (31.2% vs 26.3%). Mice, however, have more cells that display immunoreactivity to 5-HT (15.9% vs 13.7%) and PGP 9.5 (14.3% vs 9.4%). Mouse taste buds contain an average of 85.8 taste cells vs 68.4 taste cells in rat taste buds. The average volume of a mouse taste bud (42,000 microm3) is smaller than a rat taste bud (64,200 microm3). The numerical density of taste cells in mouse circumvallate taste buds (2.1 cells/1000 microm3) is significantly higher than that in the rat (1.2 cells/1000 microm3). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that rats and mice differ significantly in the percentages of taste cells expressing signaling molecules. We speculate that these observed dissimilarities may reflect differences in their gustatory processing.

Animals↗
PubMed1990

Mechanisms of chemosensory transduction in taste cells.

The application of new techniques to the study of taste cells has revealed much about both the basic physiology of these cells and also about the mechanisms of taste transduction. The taste cells are electrically excitable cells with a variety of voltage-dependent ion currents. These ionic currents have an important role in the transduction of salt taste in mammals and frogs. In mudpuppies different ion channels are involved in the transduction of acidic-sour stimuli. The role of ion currents in the transduction of sweet taste is less clear. Some proposed mechanisms suggest an important role for ion currents and others suggest that the transduction process may be a biochemical event involving cell surface receptors and intracellular second messengers, possibly cAMP. The transduction of bitter taste seems to be a biochemical event involving cell surface receptors and intracellular second messengers in the inositol trisphosphate pathway. Thus, one cannot talk about "the mechanism" of taste transduction. Different taste modalities are transduced by different mechanisms. A corollary to this is that taste cells are not a homogeneous population of cells. In order to provide animals with the ability to discriminate between different taste modalities the taste cells consist of distinct subpopulations of cells based on their primary taste modality. The primary taste modality in a given cell is determined by the receptors and transduction mechanism(s) expressed in that cell. Evidence suggests that modality-specific receptors are expressed in a segregated manner in distinct subpopulations of taste cells. Secondary responses observed in gustatory axons may arise due to a lack of absolute specificity in the transduction processes and nonspecific effects of low pH and high ionic strength and osmolarity on the taste cells. An interesting area for future work will be to elucidate the mechanism(s) by which basal cells become committed to a given taste modality and how the gustatory neurons influence this process of differentiation. The involvement of the gustatory neurons is critical as they must synapse with taste cells of the correct taste modality to preserve the integrity of the information transferred to the CNS. This process of synaptogenesis is presumably mediated by the expression of taste-modality-specific, cell surface antigens on the basolateral domain of a taste cell and receptors on the appropriate neurons, but much work will be necessary to elucidate this process.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Amiloride↗
PubMed1987

Postnatal development of the vallate papilla and taste buds in rats.

The postnatal maturation of the vallate papilla and its taste buds was quantitatively investigated in rats by ligh microscopy. Specifically, we measured postnatal increases in the size of mature vallate taste buds and the vallate papilla, increases in the thickness of the gustatory epidermis, and increases in the number of mature taste buds and taste cells per bud. Mature taste buds, defined as those having a taste pore, are rare at birth but proliferate rapidly during the first postnatal month until an average of 610 mature taste buds has accumulated by 90 days. Throughout this postnatal period, mature taste buds adjust to the developmental thickening of the epidermis by continuously increasing in length. Mature taste buds also increase in width, in part due to a threefold increase from 10 and 45 days in the number of taste cells per bud. From 10 to 21 days there is an average daily net increase of three cells per mature taste bud. The maturational increase in taste buds and cells may contribute to the functional changes in taste nerve responses known to occur over the course of several generations of taste receptor cells. The dimensions of the vallate papilla and the surface area of the gustatory epithelium increase logarithmically with age. Although mature taste buds continue to increase in number until 90 days, both taste bud density (178/mm2) and the number of cells per mature taste bud (70-75 cells) reach ceilings by 45 days. Thus, density-dependent factors appear to control vallate taste bud maturation. The immaturity of lingual taste buds in newborn rats supports the view that odor, rather than taste, is the chemosensory signal that guides suckling in altricial rodents.

Animals↗
PubMed1990

Postnatal development of palatal and laryngeal taste buds in the hamster.

Mammalian taste buds are distributed within several distinct subpopulations, innervated by branches of three cranial nerves. These taste bud populations originate and mature at different times in various mammalian species and are thought to play differential roles in the control of taste-mediated behaviors. The hamster is a common animal for the electrophysiological study of the gustatory system, and it has been shown that taste buds innervated by the IXth nerve develop postnatally in this species. To delineate further the development of the gustatory system of hamsters, we quantified the number of taste buds appearing on the palatal, nasopharyngeal, and laryngeal epithelium from birth through 120 days of age. Taste buds are present in almost adult numbers on the soft palate at birth, but only 39% of these are mature. Distinct taste pores, indicative of mature taste buds, increase in number until about 20-30 days of life, at which time all of the taste buds on the soft palate and on the nasoincisive papillae are fully developed. Taste buds are concentrated primarily on the posterior and medial portions of the soft palate. Taste buds located on the laryngeal surface of the epiglottis and the aryepiglottal folds are absent at birth and originate and mature over the following 120 days. Laryngeal taste buds are more concentrated on the aryepiglottal folds than on the epiglottis. On the soft palate and in the epiglottal region, the maturation of taste buds is well characterized by a logarithmic function (Y = a log X + B) relating the number of mature taste buds to postnatal age. On the soft palate, the length of the taste buds from base to apex correlates with the thickness of the epithelium, which increases with development. The diameter of mature taste buds on the soft palate does not change with age. In contrast to many mammalian species, in rodents taste bud development occurs mostly after birth. Rapid postnatal development progresses at a time when ingestive behavior is undergoing a number of significant changes. Taste buds in the larynx have been implicated in a number of laryngeal reflexes (i.e., apnea, swallowing) in several nonrodent species. The electrophysiological properties of superior laryngeal nerve fibers would suggest a similar function for epiglottal taste buds in the hamster.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

The rate and locus of development of rat vallate taste buds.

Several hundred taste buds develop and mature in the trench walls of the rat's vallate papilla during the first 3 months after birth. The objective of this investigation of taste bud development was to determine: (i) whether the vallate papilla has local growth zones where new taste buds form, (ii) whether new taste buds arise by the division of mature taste buds, (iii) how many days are required for a new taste bud to mature, and (iv) whether a taste pore forms as the taste bud reaches a critical volume. Camera lucida drawings were made of more than 4000 iron hematoxylin-stained, serially sectioned, vallate taste buds. The relative abundance of immature taste buds declined exponentially with age, from 18% of the mature taste buds at day 15 to 2% at day 90. At days 21, 33 and 45 most of the immature taste buds (those lacking a taste pore) were located in growth zones at the anterior and posterior extremes of the vallate trench. A mean of 10.5 days was required for the maturation of each cohort of immature taste buds present at days 15, 21, 33 and 45. Vallate taste buds were added de novo; fission of mature taste buds was rare. Taste buds varied widely in the taste bud volume at which a pore formed and in the final volume of the taste bud.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Embryonic and early fetal development of human taste buds: a transmission electron microscopical study.

BACKGROUND: Taste buds are assemblies of slender epithelial cells that receive chemical stimuli from the outer (oral) environment. In contrast to the large and well documented information on the morphology of taste buds in adult humans and animals, there are only a few reports on fetal ones, and ultrastructural studies of prenatal human taste buds are lacking completely. Therefore, the present investigation has been carried out to study the taste bud primordium, its morphological changes including synaptogenesis, cell differentiation, and taste pore formation from the time of the onset of taste bud formation around the 8th week until the 15th postovulatory week. METHODS: Taste bud primordia of 42 human embryonic/fetal tongues have been examined by means of transmission electron microscopy. RESULTS: Nerve fibers approach the lingual epithelium between the 6th and 7th postovulatory week. They penetrate the basal lamina during the 8th week and form synapses with poorly differentiated, elongated, epithelial cells. By the 12th week, more differentiated cell types are seen: 1) electron-dense cells resembling type III cells of the adult taste bud containing large numbers of dense-cored vesicles (80-150 nm in diameter); 2) electron-dark cells with well developed endoplasmic reticulum and many apical mitochondria, being candidates for type II cells. Basally, these cells have foot-like processes containing dense-cored vesicles (120-200 nm in diameter), but they do not synapse to nerve fibers. Type I cells, characterized by apically located dense secretory granules, are not observed. First shallow grooves above the taste bud primordium are found around the 10th week. Untypically differentiated apical cellular processes extend onto the surface. Most of the taste pores develop around the 14th to 15th week. In the taste pit, mucous material is not present during the first 15 weeks of gestation. Synapses between cells and afferent nerve fibers were found by the 8th week, reaching a maximum around the 12th to 13th week. CONCLUSIONS: The early presence of taste bud cells containing dense-cored vesicles suggests an at least dual function of embryonic/ fetal taste buds: First, from the 8th until the 14th week, non-gustatory, paracrine functions should be considered. After the 14th week of gestation, when typical taste pores are present, the taste buds possibly start their gustatory function. Differentiated marginal cells are possibly involved in the formation of the taste pore. The lack of type I cells producing the mucous material in the taste pit indicates that the taste bud has not achieved a fully developed function until the 15th week of gestation.

Aging↗