Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “SNEEZING”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources

Otolaryngologic presentation of tic-like disorders.

Common otolaryngologic symptoms such as coughing and sneezing may not be manifestations of disease of the upper respiratory tract. Two cases are reported in which these symptoms were the first evidence of tic-like disorders. A short discussion of one such disorder, Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome, is presented. The entity of paroxysmal sneezing is also mentioned. It is pointed out that, in the absence of otolaryngologic disease, these disorders may first present to an otolaryngologist for diagnosis.

Child↗

Concentrations of chemical mediators in nasal secretions after nasal allergen challenges in atopic patients.

By using a microsuction technique, a quantitative determination of chemical mediators in nasal secretions was performed in 18 hay-fever patients and in a control group of 10 healthy volunteers. The authors then compared these quantitative data for mediators with objective nasal findings counting the number of sneezes, passive anterior rhinomanometry (PAR) and nasal inspiratory peak flow. A sampling protocol was designed with a follow-up of 3 days after nasal allergen challenge (NAC) in order to investigate both early and late allergic reactions. Median baseline concentrations of five major mediators were obtained: histamine, 19 ng/g; leukotriene C4 (LTC4), 5.7 ng/g. tryptase, 0; prostaglandin D2 (PGD2), 477 pg/g; eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), 105 ng/g. Significant increases in histamine (214 ng/g), LTC4 (20 ng/g) and tryptase (28 microU/g) were found, but a significant decrease occurred in ECP (47 ng/g) and PGD (226 pg/g) immediately after NAC in the patients studied. Most ECP concentrations (94%) increased slowly 1 h after NAC and reached a significantly higher level 24 h later. In evaluating nasal symptoms, sneezes were present in a high percentage of cases (76%) during the early phase but were uncommon during the late phase (29%). Total nasal obstruction occurred in 94% during the early phase. In contrast, unilateral nasal obstruction presented in 82% during the late phase, whereas total nasal obstruction was present only in 41%. The most common type of late phase nasal obstruction shown by PAR was alternating nasal obstruction.

Adolescent↗

Effect of oral antigen administration on nasal blockage in experimental allergic rhinitis in guinea pigs.

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: We evaluated the effectiveness of oral treatment with Japanese cedar pollen on experimental allergic rhinitis in guinea pigs. SUBJECTS: Male Hartley guinea pigs. TREATMENT: From 16 days before the first sensitisation, 1 and 100 mg/time/animal pollen suspension was orally administered twice weekly. Animals were then sensitised and repeatedly challenged with the pollen. METHOD: Guinea pigs were sensitised by intranasal instillation of cedar pollen extracts adsorbed onto Al(OH)3 at a dose of 0.3 microg pollen protein/0.3 mg Al(OH)3/3 microl/nostril twice a day for 7 days. Then the animal was challenged by inhalation with cedar pollen (1.8 mg/nostril) once every week. We evaluated the effects of the oral treatment with antigen on: 1) sneezing frequency, 2) nasal blockage after antigen challenge, 3) nasal hyperresponsiveness to histamine and leukotriene D4, and 4) titres of anaphylactic antibodies. RESULTS: During the course of the high dose administration, several animals died from a possible cytotoxicity, whereas the low dose caused no discernible change. The oral administration of the pollen at both the doses significantly inhibited nasal blockage, and the hyperresponsiveness to the stimuli was also strongly suppressed by the oral treatment. Inhibitory effectiveness did not differ substantially between the 1 and 100 mg/animal-treated groups. In contrast, neither sneezing frequency nor the increasing level of anaphylactic antibodies was influenced by the oral administration. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found that the pollen-induced nasal blockage and hyperresponsiveness were suppressed by the oral administration of the pollen in the sensitised guinea pig.

Administration, Oral↗

Oral administration of a T cell epitope inhibits symptoms and reactions of allergic rhinitis in Japanese cedar pollen allergen-sensitized mice.

Although the concept of a T cell epitope in specific immunoprophylaxis was proposed more than a decade ago, it had not been well demonstrated since then that a T cell epitope inhibits symptoms and reactions of allergic disease in animal models. In this study, we have established a system to evaluate symptoms and reactions of allergic rhinitis in mice, and investigated whether oral administration of a T cell epitope relieves sensitized mice of allergic rhinitis. P2-246-259 (RAEVSYVHVNGAKF) is a BALB/c mouse T-cell epitope of Cry j 2, which is a major Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) pollen allergen. Mice were administered orally with 200 microg/animal of P2-246-259 four times within 2 weeks before sensitization, and sensitized intranasally with Cry j 2 twice. Of the cardinal symptoms of allergic rhinitis, we assessed sneezing and airway obstruction, but could not estimate rhinorrhea or pruritus. Sneezing frequency was significantly increased by challenge with Cry j 2. Concerning allergic reactions, vascular permeability of the nasal mucosa in the early phase and hyperreactivity to histamine in the late phase were also exacerbated by the challenge. These symptoms and reactions of allergic rhinitis were significantly inhibited by oral administration of P2-246-259. These results indicate utility of mice as models for allergic rhinitis; furthermore, the effects of P2-246-259 on allergic rhinitis imply that oral administration of a T cell epitope is a promising approach for specific immunoprophylaxis.

Administration, Oral↗

Heparin attenuates symptoms and mast cell degranulation induced by AMP nasal provocation.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that inhaled heparin attenuated the airway responses to allergen, exercise, and AMP bronchial provocation, possibly through an inhibition of mast cell activation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide the evidence of in vivo inhibition of human mast cell activation by heparin in a noninvasive model. METHODS: Nine atopic and 6 nonatopic subjects received placebo and unfractionated heparin sodium (5000 IU/mL) 15 minutes before an AMP nasal provocation in a double-blind crossover study design. The nasal lavage was collected from these subjects before or 3, 5, 15, or 30 minutes after the AMP nasal challenge, and concentrations of histamine and tryptase in the nasal lavage were measured. RESULTS: AMP nasal provocation produced considerable sneezing and induced a transient increase in histamine and tryptase release, with peak values achieved at 3 to 5 minutes after the challenge in all atopic subjects. Compared with placebo, inhaled heparin significantly attenuated the release of histamine and tryptase induced by AMP challenge (P=.012 and.004, respectively). Moreover, the AMP-induced sneezing was also inhibited by pretreatment with heparin (P=.016). In nonatopic subjects, AMP did not induce a significant increase in histamine and tryptase release on placebo-treated or heparin-treated days. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that AMP nasal provocation and AMP bronchial provocation cause mast cell mediator release in a similar fashion. In addition, the data support the hypothesis that inhaled heparin plays a protective role against AMP provocation by inhibition of mast cell activation.

Adenosine Monophosphate↗

Efficacy of Tinospora cordifolia in allergic rhinitis.

The efficacy of Tinospora cordifolia (TC) extract in patients of allergic rhinitis was assessed in a randomized double blind placebo controlled trial. Seventy-five patients were randomly given either TC or placebo for 8 weeks. They were clinically examined and Hb %, TLC, DLC and nasal smear was done. At the end of trial baseline investigations were repeated, drug decoded and results analyzed. With TC treatment 100% relief was reported from sneezing in 83% patients, in 69% from nasal discharge, in 61% from nasal obstruction and in 71% from nasal pruritus. In placebo group, there was no relief in 79% from sneezing, in 84.8% from nasal discharge, in 83% from nasal obstruction, and in 88% from nasal pruritus. The difference between TC and placebo groups was highly significant. TLC increased in 69% patients in drug treated group and in only 11% with placebo. After TC, eosinophil and neutrophil count decreased and goblet cells were absent in nasal smear. After placebo, decrease in eosinophil and neutrophil count was marginal and goblet cells were present. TC significantly decreased all symptoms of allergic rhinitis. Nasal smear cytology and leukocyte count correlated with clinical findings. TC was well tolerated.

Administration, Oral↗

Nasal allergy-like symptoms aggravated by ozone exposure in a concentration-dependent manner in guinea pigs.

Our previous study revealed that exposure to 0.4 ppm ozone (O(3)) enhanced nasal allergy-like reactions in guinea pigs. In the present study, we investigated the concentration-dependency of the effects of exposure to O(3) on the aggravation of nasal allergy-like reactions induced by repeated nasal administration of antigen. Guinea pigs were exposed to filtered air or 0.1-0.6 ppm O(3) for 5 weeks. After each weekly administration of ovalbumin (OVA), sneezes and nasal secretions were measured. The number of eosinophils infiltrating the nasal septum and the titers of OVA-specific antibody were measured 24h after the last administration. Ozone increased sneezing and nasal secretion induced by OVA, nasal responsiveness to physical stimuli, and the number of infiltrating eosinophils in a concentration-dependent manner. The titer of anti-OVA-IgG was increased in animals exposed to 0.6 ppm O(3). Thus, exposure to O(3) aggravated nasal allergy-like symptoms concentration dependently. The aggravation was caused by induction of nasal hyperresponsiveness, the infiltration of eosinophils, and the increase in the production of anti-OVA-IgG. The estimated maximum likelihood estimation concentrations (MLECs) and bench mark concentrations (BMCs) of O(3) for these indices were in the range of 0.09-0.18 and 0.02-0.06 ppm, respectively.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Participation of chemical mediators other than histamine in nasal allergy signs: a study using mice lacking histamine H(1) receptors.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the involvement of chemical mediators other than histamine in nasal allergic signs using histamine H(1) receptor-deficient mice. In passively sensitized mice, antigen instillation into the nasal cavity induced significant increases in sneezing and nasal rubbing in wild-type mice, but no such increases were observed in histamine H(1) receptor-deficient mice. In actively sensitized mice, both sneezing and nasal rubbing were also significantly increased in a dose-dependent manner in both wild-type and histamine H(1) receptor-deficient mice. Histamine H(1) receptor antagonists such as cetirizine and epinastine significantly inhibited antigen-induced nasal allergic signs in wild-type mice, although the effects were incomplete. In addition, the thromboxane A(2) receptor antagonist ramatroban also inhibited these responses in wild-type mice. However, the leukotriene receptor antagonist zafirlukast showed no effects in wild-type mice. These results suggested that in the acute allergic model (passive sensitization), only histamine H(1) receptors are related to nasal signs induced by antigen, whereas in the chronic allergic model (active sensitization), both histamine H(1) receptors and thromboxane A(2) receptors were involved in the responses.

Animals↗

Mechanisms of urinary continence: an animal model to study urethral responses to stress conditions.

Under conditions of stress, the urethral sphincteric mechanism has to compensate a passive bladder pressure rise induced by increase in intraabdominal pressure. To evaluate the various closure mechanisms contributing to urethral response to stress, we subjected a female dog model to the physiologic stress condition triggered by sneezing. Vesical, rectal and 4 urethral pressures during sneezing were recorded simultaneously under various experimental situations: in the intact animal, after transection of the bladder and urethra, and with the abdomen open. The effects of the Credé maneuver and of manual squeezing of the surgically exposed bladder were also recorded. The data obtained support the existence of a 2-component urethral closure mechanism under stress: the proximal closure mechanism of the smooth muscular, intrapelvic urethra is from passive transmission of abdominal pressure. It is apt to balance a passive increase in bladder pressure and thus maintain proximal closure pressure during stress. The distal closure pressure mechanism reflects active reflex contraction of the intrinsic external sphincter and pelvic floor muscles, which is capable of exceeding passive increase in bladder pressure and thus augments closure pressure during stress.

Abdomen↗

A double-blind study of the discontinuation of ragweed immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy effectively treats the symptoms of allergic rhinitis and improves its pathophysiology. We studied whether the effects of immunotherapy on the early response to nasal challenge with antigen and seasonal symptoms persist after discontinuation. METHODS: Twenty subjects with ragweed allergy who were receiving immunotherapy and who had nasal challenges performed before initiation of treatment were selected. The patients had been receiving maintenance therapy with aqueous ragweed extract at a dose of 12 microg of Amb a 1 equivalent for a minimum of 3 years, at which point they were randomized to receive either placebo injections or to continue with the maintenance dose. Nasal challenges were performed before and 1 year after randomization. Nasal challenges were monitored by counting the number of sneezes and measuring histamine, N-alpha-tosyl-L-arginine methyl ester-esterase activity, and kinins in recovered nasal lavages. In the same year symptom diaries were collected during the ragweed season. RESULTS: The initial immunotherapy significantly reduced responses to nasal challenge in both groups. The group continuing to receive active treatment showed no significant changes from the response before randomization. In contrast, the group randomized to placebo treatment showed a partial return of histamine, kinins, and N-alpha-tosyl-L-arginine methyl ester-esterase in nasal secretions and the numbers of sneezes. IgG antibodies to ragweed declined only in the group switched to placebo treatment. Seasonal rises of IgE antibodies to ragweed did not return during the first season after treatment was stopped. Symptoms reported during the ragweed season were not different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: One year after discontinuation of ragweed immunotherapy, nasal challenges showed partial recrudescence of mediator responses even though reports during the season appeared to indicate continued suppression of symptoms.

Adolescent↗

Exposure to ozone aggravates nasal allergy-like symptoms in guinea pigs.

The ability of O3 exposure to aggravate ovalbumin (OVA)-induced nasal allergy-like symptoms was studied in guinea pigs. Guinea pigs were exposed to filtered air or to 0.4 ppm O3 for 5 weeks. During the exposure, 1% OVA or saline was administered into the nasal cavities once a week. Sneezes and nasal secretions were measured for a 20-min period following OVA administration. The number of eosinophils infiltrating both nasal epithelium and subepithelium and titers of specific anti-OVA-IgG were measured 24 h after the last administration. Ozone increased OVA-induced sneezing and nasal secretion, as well as induced nasal hyper-responsiveness to physical stimuli. The number of eosinophils infiltrating the nasal subepithelium was increased by O3, and the titer of anti-OVA-IgG tended to increase in the O3-exposed animals. Thus, exposure to O3 aggravated nasal allergy-like symptoms by inducing nasal hyper-responsiveness, the infiltration of eosinophils, and by tending to increase the production of anti-OVA-IgG.

Administration, Intranasal↗

Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray improves nasal symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis when used as needed (prn).

BACKGROUND: Few published clinical trials document the efficacy of intranasal corticosteroids used as needed for treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 4 weeks' treatment with fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray 200 microg used as needed (FP200PRN) in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 241 patients (> or = 12 years of age) with a positive skin test result to a relevant fall allergen and who were symptomatic at randomization. The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline in total nasal symptom score (TNSS; the sum of nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, sneezing, and nasal itching, each rated on a 4-point scale from 0 = none to 3 = severe). RESULTS: The mean percentage of days that patients used the study medications in the FP200PRN and placebo groups was 61.8% (SD = 30.4%) and 70.1% (SD = 28.3%), respectively. Patients treated with FP200PRN had a significantly greater reduction from baseline in TNSS compared with those treated with vehicle placebo (mean +/- SE = -2.02 +/- 0.18 vs -1.06 +/- 0.22, P < 0.001), representing a 91% greater improvement with FP200PRN than vehicle placebo. The FP200PRN group also had a significantly greater (P < 0.001) mean reduction in individual nasal symptoms of rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal itching, and nasal congestion compared with placebo. FP200PRN was well tolerated, with an incidence of adverse events comparable to vehicle placebo. CONCLUSIONS: FP200PRN in patients 12 years and older is effective for treatment of nasal symptoms associated with seasonal allergic rhinitis. It has a lower incidence of adverse events than typically associated with regular once-daily use.

Administration, Intranasal↗

Effect of cetirizine, levocetirizine, and dextrocetirizine on histamine-induced nasal response in healthy adult volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Cetirizine, an effective H1-receptor antagonist, is a racemate mixture of two enantiomers: levocetirizine (R enantiomer) and dextrocetirizine (S enantiomer). METHODS: To investigate the pharmacologic activity of the two enantiomers of cetirizine, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, four-way, crossover study to assess the effect of treatment with 5 mg levocetirizine, 5 mg dextrocetirizine, and 10 mg cetirizine and matched placebo, on histamine-induced changes in the nasal airways of 24 healthy volunteers. Four hours after a single oral intake, all subjects were challenged by nasal aerosol application with increasing doubling concentrations (from 0.25 to 32 mg/ml) of histamine in both nostrils. Nasal resistance was measured by passive anterior rhinomanometry (PAR), and changes in histamine threshold were calculated together with the absolute number of sneezes after each challenge. RESULTS: Both levocetirizine and cetirizine significantly attenuated the histamine-induced increase in nasal airway resistance by nearly 50% (from a median resistance of 2.51 Pa per cm3/s to 1.29 and 1.31 Pa per cm3/s, respectively) at the maximal concentration, and they concomitantly increased the histamine threshold by fourfold (from 8 to 32 mg/ml), compared with placebo. Sneezing was also attenuated by both levocetirizine and cetirizine. However, these antihistaminic effects were not seen with dextrocetirizine. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a similar activity of levocetirizine and cetirizine on the inhibition of histamine-induced increase in nasal resistance, indicating that the antihistaminic properties of cetirizine are probably attributable to levocetirizine.

Adult↗

Histamine and tryptase in nasal lavage fluid following challenge with methacholine and allergen.

BACKGROUND: The level of histamine in nasal lavage fluid has been used as an index of mast cell/basophil activation in a number of studies. Obviously, such an index can only be valid if changes in the secretory activity of nasal glands do not affect the level of histamine in lavage fluid (i.e. hypersecretion, without a simultaneous activation of mast cells/basophils in the nasal mucosa, must not increase the level of histamine). OBJECTIVES: To asses the effect of nasal hypersecretion on histamine levels in lavage fluid. METHODS: Nasal challenges were performed with methacholine and allergen in grass pollen-allergic patients and non-allergic controls. Nasal lavage fluid was collected before and repeatedly for nine hours after nasal challenge, and the level of histamine was compared with that of a specific mast cell-derived enzyme, tryptase. In addition, the effect of methacholine on basophils was examined in vitro. RESULTS: Allergen challenge of allergic patients produced sneezing and a significant increase in histamine and tryptase levels, whereas challenge of non-allergic subjects produced no such response. Interestingly, challenge with methacholine also induced a significant increase in histamine levels. This increase was seen in both allergic and non-allergic subjects and it was not associated with any sneezing or increase in tryptase levels, indicating that mast cells were not activated. Furthermore, stimulation of basophils with methacholine did not induce any histamine release in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: Apparently, there exists a pool of histamine in the human nose that can be transferred to lavage fluid during glandular hypersecretion. The source of this histamine is yet to be identified. As the level of histamine seems to be affected by the secretory activity of nasal glands, we question the use of this single mediator as an index of mast cell/basophil activation in nasal lavage studies.

Administration, Intranasal↗

[Bowmaker's disease: an occupational disease in the manufacture of bows for string instruments].

Inhalation of wood dust from the tropical tree Fernambouc (Caesalpinia echinata) in the manufacture of string bows can cause characteristic symptoms (bow-makers disease). To confirm this observation, 177 bow-makers, working in a village near Erlangen (Bavaria), the centre of this manufacture, filled in questionnaires. Of these 36 worked with Fernambouc, 141 with other types of wood. Twelve out of these 36 suffered from dyspnoea, cough, sneezing impulses, tearing and coryza, which would disappear quickly at weekends and during holidays. 14 of those working with other types of wood merely had sneezing, irritation of the mucosa, a few also cough, dyspnoea and tearing. Extracts of Fernambouc splinters were made for serological testing. However, neither experimental sensitization in animals nor skin tests in the twelve gave allergic reactions. A 51-year-old woman with long-standing bronchial asthma developed dyspnoea five minutes after an inhalative provocation test; a prick test brought about slight infiltration. Thus, no evidence of an allergic origin of symptoms from Fernambouc dust inhalation could be elicited.

Asthma↗

Effect of desloratadine versus placebo on nasal airflow and subjective measures of nasal obstruction in subjects with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis in an allergen-exposure unit.

BACKGROUND: Unlike many antihistamines, desloratadine can reduce nasal congestion in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). OBJECTIVE: We compared the effects of 5 mg of desloratadine and placebo on nasal airflow and SAR symptoms, including nasal congestion, in response to grass pollen in an allergen-exposure unit. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial, 47 subjects with histories of SAR received desloratadine or placebo every morning for 7 days and, after a 10-day washout period, were crossed over to the other treatment arm for 7 days. Subjects underwent a 6-hour allergen exposure on day 7 of each treatment period. Nasal airflow and nasal secretion weights were measured before and every 30 minutes during allergen exposure; SAR symptoms (including nasal congestion) were scored before exposure and every 15 minutes thereafter. RESULTS: Nasal obstruction, as measured by nasal airflow, was less severe with desloratadine than with placebo (P <.02). Individual and combined SAR symptom severity scores, including nasal congestion and sneezing, were significantly lower with desloratadine than with placebo (all P < or =.003). Within 30 minutes of allergen exposure, less severely decreased nasal airflow (P <.02), less nasal secretions (P <.001), and less severe symptoms, including nasal congestion (P <.002), rhinorrhea, and sneezing, occurred with desloratadine compared with placebo, and this continued throughout (0-6 hours) allergen exposure. Desloratadine was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile similar to that of placebo. CONCLUSION: In subjects with allergen-induced SAR symptoms, desloratadine significantly reduced the severity of nasal obstruction and accompanying complaints of nasal congestion and other SAR symptoms compared with the effects of placebo.

Adult↗

Effects of anti-VLA-4 monoclonal antibody treatment in murine model of allergic rhinitis.

In order to study the role of VLA-4 in allergic rhinitis, the effects of anti-mouse VLA-4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) were evaluated in a murine model. BALB/c mice were sensitized first by i.p. injections (general sensitization) and then by daily nasal dripping of antigen (local sensitization) before performing a nasal antigen challenge. The mAb was applied either before the antigen challenge (BC group), before the local sensitization (BL group) or before the general sensitization (BS group). The effects were evaluated in terms of antigen-induced early-phase nasal symptoms (sneezing), late-phase nasal eosinophilia and the serum level of antigen-specific IgE. Antigen-induced nasal eosinophilia was significantly (p = 0.009) reduced in the BL group but not in the BC group (number of eosinophils = 114 +/- 15.1, 244 +/- 52.8 and 347 +/- 50.5 in the BL, BC and control groups, respectively). The serum level of the specific IgE was also significantly (p = 0.038) reduced in the BL group but not in the BC group (optical density = 1.18 +/- 0.07, 1.28 +/- 0.13 and 1.58 +/- 0.14 in the BL, BC and control groups, respectively). The suppressive effect on sneezing was not significant in either the BL or BC groups. In the BS group, suppressive effects on antigen-induced nasal responses and the specific IgE level were not statistically significant. These findings suggest that VLA-4 plays an important role in the topical booster or priming effects during repeated nasal antigen exposures in pre-sensitized animals.

Animals↗

Nasal histamine reactivity; relationships to skin-test responses, allergen provocation and symptom severity in patients with long-continuing allergic rhinitis.

It has been reported that skin-test reactivity and rhinitis symptom severity weaken in the course of time. A corresponding weakening might also be seen in non-specific nasal hyper-reactivity, but the relationships of these responses are poorly understood. Our aim was to measure nasal responsiveness to histamine in a series of patients with long-continuing allergic rhinitis and to compare these measurements with skin test responses, allergen provocation and changes in severity of allergic rhinitis symptoms. A total of 73 patients in whom allergic rhinitis had been verified over 20 years earlier were re-interviewed and re-investigated. Skin prick tests with common allergens were performed and the presence of nasal allergy was confirmed by allergen provocation. Non-specific nasal hyper-reactivity was determined with nasal histamine challenge using four concentrations of histamine phosphate. The response was registered by counting sneezes, recording changes in nasal discharge and mucosal swelling and measuring nasal airway resistance. Sneezing and discharge scores showed that milder non-specific nasal hyper-reactivity was associated with lack of reactivity in skin prick tests and nasal allergen challenge. No association was observed between allergy test results and changes in nasal airway resistance during the histamine provocation. In most patients the symptoms of rhinitis had become milder or disappeared during the follow-up, but the results of the histamine challenge showed no relationship with the changes in symptom severity. In patients with allergic rhinitis, reactivity to histamine is associated with a concomitant change in skin and nasal mucosal reactivity to allergens.

Airway Resistance↗