Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “SHOULDER”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Prevalence of shoulder pain in the community: the influence of case definition.

OBJECTIVE: To compare estimates of the occurrence of shoulder pain according to (a) different approaches to defining 'shoulder' and (b) restricting the definition to only include those with associated disability. METHODS: A postal questionnaire survey was sent to a sample of 500 patients registered with a general practice in south Manchester. After additional mailings to non-responders, 312 questionnaires were returned (66% adjusted response rate). Four definitions of shoulder pain were used to estimate the occurrence of symptoms derived from answers to the questionnaire. Two were based on questions asking directly about pain in the shoulder and the upper trunk and neck region respectively and two were based on markings on a pain drawing in the shoulder complex and the upper trunk respectively. To determine the occurrence of disabling shoulder pain responders were subsequently approached for interview. Of the responders, 232 (74%) were successfully interviewed. Those indicating that they were suffering from 'current' shoulder symptoms, pain on the day of interview, were asked to complete a short, 23 item, questionnaire enquiring about disability in daily living associated with such symptoms. RESULTS: In total 160 (51%) people reported shoulder pain according to at least one definition. This one month period prevalence ranged from 31% to 48% across the four definitions with the lowest estimate being for the question asking directly about shoulder symptoms. In total 84 people (27% of all respondents) answered positively to all four definitions. Only seven people who answered positively when asked directly about shoulder pain did not indicate symptoms on the pain drawing in the shoulder complex. By contrast 65 (30%) of those answering negatively to the direct question about shoulder pain indicated symptoms on the pain drawing in the upper trunk region or answered positively to the direct question about pain in the upper trunk or neck region. However only 19 (9%) of those answering negatively to the direct question indicated symptoms in the shoulder complex on the pain drawing, compared with 38 (18%) indicating symptoms in the upper trunk region and 59 (27%) symptoms in the upper trunk and neck region. Limiting the definition to only include current symptoms with some associated disability (at least one item on the disability questionnaire being answered positively) restricted the point prevalence to 20% (n = 46). CONCLUSIONS: Using a pain drawing based definition with case ascertainment restricted to an area in and around the shoulder complex is recommended for surveys assessing the occurrence of shoulder symptoms in the general population. To solve the problem of the poor specificity associated with symptom based definitions it is useful to incorporate an additional classification to restrict the definition to more disabling problems.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Long-term results of staple capsulorrhaphy for anterior instability of the shoulder.

The results of 204 open staple capsulorrhaphies, performed consecutively as treatment for recurrent anterior instability of the shoulder in 192 patients, were reviewed after an average of ten years (range, two to twenty years). The operation had been performed for recurrent dislocations in 88 per cent of the shoulders and for recurrent subluxations in the remaining 12 per cent. Postoperative instability--dislocation or subluxation--occurred in 22 per cent of the shoulders and increased in frequency logarithmically with the duration of follow-up. In more than half of these shoulders, the episodes of postoperative instability were recurrent. In one-third of the shoulders, the stapling had been combined with a Putti-Platt procedure; in the others, a muscle-splitting approach had been used. The rate of recurrent instability was 8 per cent in the shoulders in which a Putti-Platt procedure had been added and 29 per cent in the shoulders that had been treated by stapling alone. The difference was significant (p = 0.002). Loosening or migration of a staple, or penetration of the articular cartilage by a staple, occurred in twenty-four shoulders (12 per cent); the staple was removed from eighteen of them. There was no significant difference in the rate of loosening or migration between non-barbed and barbed staples (p = 0.92). Pain, physical restrictions, and osteoarthrosis were more frequent in patients who had complications associated with a staple. Although most of the patients (84 per cent of the shoulders) thought that they had benefited from the operation, approximately half (51 per cent of the shoulders) had pain and approximately half (50 per cent of the shoulders) said that the shoulder was sufficiently different from normal to affect the quality of life. Problems with the shoulder that had not been present before the operation caused several patients (5 per cent of the shoulders) to change occupations. The average ranges of internal and external rotation were slightly reduced. The subjective and objective results after the stapling procedure were not as good as previous reports have suggested, and we no longer recommend staple capsulorrhaphy for anterior instability of the shoulder, even when it is augmented by a Putti-Platt procedure.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Ipsilateral total shoulder and elbow arthroplasties in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: The data on seventeen patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had been managed with ipsilateral total shoulder and elbow arthroplasties were analyzed to determine whether the operative technique, the presence of total shoulder and total elbow prostheses in the same upper extremity, or complications of the arthroplasties affected the result in each joint or the overall functional outcome of the upper extremity. METHODS: Seventeen patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were managed with a total of eighteen ipsilateral total shoulder and elbow arthroplasties were evaluated. The most recent physical examination was at an average of six years and six months (range, two years and one month to fourteen years) postoperatively. Radiographs, including 40-degree oblique and axillary radiographs of the shoulder as well as anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the elbow, were made at an average of six years and eleven months (range, two years and two months to twenty-two years and eleven months) postoperatively. The radiographs of the shoulder were examined for loosening of the glenoid component, glenohumeral subluxation, and radiolucency at the bone-cement or bone-implant interface. The functional results of the total shoulder arthroplasties were evaluated with use of the rating systems of Neer et al. and Cofield. The Mayo elbow-performance score was used to evaluate elbow function. A rating system was also developed to assess the overall function of the upper extremity, including pain and motion of both the elbow and the shoulder. With this system, the overall function of the upper extremity was rated as excellent, good, fair, or poor. RESULTS: Evaluation of the shoulders revealed substantial relief of pain and an increase in active elevation. On radiographic evaluation, eight glenoid and five humeral components were considered to be loose. There were no reoperations. According to the rating system of Neer et al., eight shoulders had a satisfactory result and eight had an unsatisfactory result with limited active abduction. Limited-goals rehabilitation was successful after one shoulder arthroplasty and unsuccessful after another. There were two type-B periprosthetic humeral fractures. There was also substantial relief of pain in the elbows as well as an increase in the extension-flexion arc; the pronation-supination arc was sufficient for tasks of daily living. There was no radiographic loosening. Two elbows had an avulsion of the triceps, and two had aseptic loosening (one of which also had a worn bushing); all four needed a reoperation. One other elbow had persistent ulnar neuritis. The average interval between the arthroplasties was two years and eight months when the shoulder was replaced first and three years and five months when the elbow was replaced first. The interval between the joint replacements and the sequence of the joint replacements were not found to influence the outcome. Function of the extremity was improved by replacement of either the shoulder or the elbow alone; however, it improved significantly only when both joints were replaced (p = 0.03). According to combined clinical outcomes scores, there were nine excellent outcomes, four good outcomes, four fair outcomes, and one poor outcome after ipsilateral total shoulder and elbow arthroplasties. CONCLUSIONS: When there is severe arthritis of both the shoulder and the elbow, consideration should be given to replacing both joints in order to obtain optimum functional and clinical outcomes. The possibility of fracture of the humeral shaft necessitates an alteration of the technique for ipsilateral total shoulder and elbow arthroplasties.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Shoulder arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the glenoid in patients who have osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: The indications for resurfacing of the glenoid in patients who have osteoarthritis of the shoulder are not clearly defined; some investigators routinely perform hemiarthroplasty whereas others perform total shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: Forty-seven patients (fifty-one shoulders) who were scheduled to have a shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of degenerative osteoarthritis were randomly assigned, according to a random-numbers table, to one of two groups: replacement of the humeral head with resurfacing of the glenoid with a polyethylene component with cement (total shoulder arthroplasty [twenty-seven shoulders]) or replacement of the humeral head without resurfacing of the glenoid (hemiarthroplasty [twenty-four shoulders]). All patients received the same type of humeral component, and all operations were performed by or under the direct supervision of the same surgeon. The patients were followed for a mean of thirty-five months (range, twenty-four to seventy-two months) postoperatively. Evaluation was performed with use of the scoring systems of the University of California at Los Angeles and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. RESULTS: No difference was observed between the preoperative scores for the two groups of patients. Postoperatively, the mean scores with use of the University of California at Los Angeles system and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons system were 23.2 points (range, 10 to 31 points) and 65.2 points (range, 15 to 94 points), respectively, after hemiarthroplasty and 27.4 points (range, 9 to 34 points) and 77.3 points (range, 3 to 100 points), respectively, after total shoulder arthroplasty. With the numbers available for study, no significant difference was found between the two operative groups with respect to the postoperative score. (Thirty-five subjects per group would be needed, assuming an effect size of 0.60 and a power of 0.80.) Total shoulder arthroplasty provided significantly greater pain relief (p = 0.002) and internal rotation (p = 0.003) than hemiarthroplasty did. Total shoulder arthroplasty also provided superior results in the specific areas of patient satisfaction, function, and strength, although none of these differences were found to be significant, with the numbers available. Total shoulder arthroplasty was associated with increased cost ($1177), operative time (thirty-five minutes), and blood loss (150 milliliters) per patient compared with hemiarthroplasty. To date, none of the total shoulder arthroplasties in the study group have been revised. Hemiarthroplasty yielded equivalent results for elevation and external rotation. Three of the twenty-five patients who had had a hemiarthroplasty needed a subsequent operation for resurfacing of the glenoid. The mean cost for the revision operations was $15,998. CONCLUSIONS: Total shoulder arthroplasty provided superior pain relief compared with hemiarthroplasty in patients who had glenohumeral osteoarthritis, but it was associated with an increased cost of $1177 per patient.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Quality-of-life outcome following hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis. A prospective, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Both total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty have been used commonly to treat severe osteoarthritis of the shoulder; however, their effect on disease-specific quality-of-life outcome is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the quality-of-life outcome following hemiarthroplasty with that following total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder. METHODS: Forty-two patients with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis of the shoulder were randomized to receive a hemiarthroplasty or a total shoulder arthroplasty. One patient died, and all others were evaluated preoperatively and at six weeks and three, six, twelve, eighteen, and twenty-four months postoperatively with use of a standardized format including a disease-specific quality-of-life measurement tool (Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder [WOOS] index), general shoulder rating scales (University of California at Los Angeles [UCLA] shoulder scale, Constant score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] evaluation form), general pain scales (McGill pain score and visual analogue scale), and a global health measure (Short Form-36 [SF-36]). When a patient required revision of a hemiarthroplasty to a total shoulder arthroplasty, the last score before he or she "crossed over" was used for the analysis. RESULTS: Significant improvements in disease-specific quality of life were seen two years after both the total shoulder arthroplasties and the hemiarthroplasties. There were no significant differences in quality of life (WOOS score) between the group treated with total shoulder arthroplasty and that treated with hemiarthroplasty (90.6 +/- 13.2 and 81.5 +/- 24.1 points, respectively; p = 0.18). The other outcome measures demonstrated similar findings. Two patients in the hemiarthroplasty group crossed over to the other group by undergoing a revision to a total shoulder arthroplasty because of glenoid arthrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Both total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty improve disease-specific and general quality-of-life measurements. With the small number of patients in our study, we found no significant differences in these measurements between the two treatment groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Shoulder impingement in front-crawl swimming: I. A method to identify impingement.

PURPOSE: The impingement of subacromial structures has been proposed as a major cause of the shoulder problems experienced by athletes who use repetitive overhead actions. The purpose of this study was to develop a noninvasive method to identify instances at which the shoulder was experiencing impingement during front-crawl swimming. METHODS: Shoulder impingement has been reported to occur when an arm is: (a) elevated above shoulder height while being rotated internally; and (b) forcibly elevated at, or beyond, the maximum active elevation angle. In this study shoulder configurations that satisfied the above two conditions were sought throughout the functional range of each shoulder; and a boundary that distinguished configurations that would cause shoulder impingement was defined. The shoulder movements exhibited during performance of the front-crawl stroke were measured using three-dimensional videography and compared with the boundary defined for each shoulder. The shoulder was considered to experience impingement if the shoulder configuration observed exceeded the boundary defined for that shoulder. RESULTS: For a male collegiate swimmer, impingement occurred for 12% of the stroke time for each shoulder. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis permitted the identification of the instances at which the shoulders were experiencing impingement during the front-crawl swimming. In this study, the measurement of the boundary was based entirely upon the mechanism of impingement described in the literature. Further studies are needed to confirm the occurrence of impingement by means of advanced visualization techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonogram.

Acromion↗
PubMed2003

Radiographic analysis of bone defects in chronic anterior shoulder instability.

PURPOSE: To describe the incidence of bony lesions accompanying chronic anterior shoulder instability using fluoroscopically controlled radiography. TYPE OF STUDY: Case series of radiographic findings of patients with chronic anterior shoulder instability. METHODS: Radiographs of 160 shoulders in 156 patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability were retrospectively evaluated; 132 shoulders had experienced recurrent dislocations, 18 shoulders had experienced recurrent subluxations, and 10 shoulders showed evidence of anterior instability at arthroscopy despite no reported history of instability. Fluoroscopically controlled radiographic views included an anteroposterior view with the humeral head in 3 rotations and a glenoid profile view with a comparison view of the contralateral shoulder. RESULTS: A humeral impaction fracture was identified on the anteroposterior radiographs in 117 of 160 shoulders (73.1%). The glenoid profile view showed an osseous lesion of the glenoid in 126 of 160 shoulders (78.8%). The anteroposterior radiograph showed an osseous lesion of the glenoid in an additional 13 shoulders (8.2%). Overall, an osseous lesion, either humeral or glenoid, was identified in 152 of 160 shoulders (95.0%). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the frequent presence of bony lesions in patients with anterior shoulder instability.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Helmet and shoulder pad removal from a player with suspected cervical spine injury. A cadaveric model.

STUDY DESIGN: Video fluoroscopy was used to evaluate the motion in an unstable spine during helmet and shoulder pad removal. OBJECTIVE: To observe the amount of motion that occurs during the removal of helmet and shoulder pads in an injured spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Removal of shoulder pads and helmet from a football player with suspected cervical spine injury can be particularly hazardous. How much flexion occurs at the unstable level during removal of equipment is unknown. METHODS: Six fresh cadavers were used in the study. In three, an unstable C1-C2 segment was created by transoral osteotomy of the base of C2. In the remaining three, instability was created at C5-C6 by a posterior release. Under fluoroscopic recording, the helmets were removed by first removing the chin strap, face mask, and ear pieces. With the neck stabilized, the helmet was carefully removed. The shoulder pads were carefully removed, with the head stabilized. Angulation, distraction, and space available for the cord were measured at C1-C2. Translation, angulation, distraction, and change in disc height were measured in the specimens with unstable C5-C6. RESULTS: In cadavers with C1-C2 instability, the mean change in angulation was 5.47 degrees, and space available for the cord was 3.91 mm. Shoulder pads were removed while the head was stabilized. The mean change in angulation at C1-C2 was less during removal of shoulder pads than during helmet removal at 2.9 degrees. Space available for the cord was 2.64 mm. Distraction was also greater during helmet removal (2.98 mm) than during shoulder pad removal (1.76 mm). In the unstable spine, the change in displacement in translation was greater during shoulder pad removal (3.87 mm), than during helmet removal (0.41 mm). Disc height change was similar. Distraction of the spinous processes was greater during helmet removal (3.68 mm) than during shoulder pad removal (1.37 mm). Angulation was similar in both maneuvers. CONCLUSIONS: Helmet and shoulder pad removal in the unstable cervical spine is a complex maneuver. In the unstable C1-C2 segment, helmet removal causes more angulation in flexion, more distraction, and more narrowing of the space available for the cord. In the lower cervical spine (C5-C6), helmet removal causes flexion of 9.32 degrees, and during shoulder pad removal the neck extends 8.95 degrees, a total of approximately 18 degrees. Disc height changes from 1.24 mm of distraction to 1.06 mm of compression during helmet removal and shoulder pad removal for a total 2.3-mm change. Translation, which correlates with the change in the space available for the cord, is greater at C5-C6 during shoulder pad removal. Because most of the cadavers had C5 anteriorly displaced on C6 to begin with, the extension force during shoulder pad removal caused a 3.87-mm change in reduction of C5 on C6. Because of the motion observed in the unstable spine, helmet and shoulder pad removal should be performed in a carefully monitored setting. They should be removed together by at least three, preferably four, trained people.

Cadaver↗
PubMed1996

Muscular imbalance and shoulder pain in volleyball attackers.

OBJECTIVE: In overhead sports such as volleyball, baseball, or tennis shoulder problems are very common. The aim of this study was to identify features which may correlate with shoulder problems in volleyball attackers. METHODS: 30 competitive volleyball attackers (mean age 25 years) were included in the study; 15 were suffering from shoulder pain and 15 had no history of shoulder pain. The results were compared with those of a control group of 15 recreational athletes without any overhead sports activities. RESULTS: Volleyball attackers have a different muscular and capsular pattern at the playing shoulder compared to the opposite shoulder. Their playing shoulder is depressed, the scapula lateralised, and the dorsal muscles and the posterior and inferior part of the shoulder capsule shortened. These differences were of more significance in volleyball attackers with shoulder pain than in volleyball players without shoulder pain. In contrast to recreational athletes without any overhead sports activity, there were no significant difference in the comparison of the two shoulders. The histories, clinical and sonographic findings did not reveal further typical features for volleyball attackers with shoulder pain. CONCLUSIONS: Muscular balance of the shoulder girdle is very important in this sport. It is therefore imperative to include adequate stretching and muscular training programme for the prevention, as well as for therapy, of shoulder pain in volleyball attackers.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Shoulder pain and subluxation after stroke: correlation or coincidence?

OBJECTIVE: Few studies have concomitantly examined shoulder subluxation and other potential causes of shoulder pain in persons who have had a stroke. This study explores whether shoulder pain after stroke is related to shoulder subluxation, age, limitations in shoulder range of motion, and upper extremity motor impairment. METHOD: Shoulder pain was measured with a visual analog scale in 20 subjects admitted to a rehabilitation hospital within 6 weeks of onset of their first stroke. Degree of shoulder pain was correlated with vertical, horizontal, and total asymmetries of glenohumeral subluxation; age; shoulder flexion, abduction, and external rotation; and the upper extremity subscore of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment. RESULTS: Shoulder pain after stroke was not correlated with age (rk = .019, p = .916); vertical (rk = .081, p = .324), horizontal (rk = .126, p = .241), or total asymmetry (rk = -.098, p = .288); shoulder flexion (rk = .049, p = .390) or abduction (rk = -.074, p = .337); or Fugl-Meyer scores (rk = -.123, p = .257). In contrast, shoulder pain was strongly correlated with degree of shoulder external rotation (rk = -.457, p = .006). CONCLUSION: These results do not support a strong relationship between shoulder subluxation and pain after stroke. Appropriate precautions should be taken to prevent range of motion limitations that may result in shoulder pain.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Delayed reorganization of the shoulder representation in forepaw barrel subfield (FBS) in first somatosensory cortex (SI) following forelimb deafferentation in adult rats.

We previously reported that 6-16 weeks after forelimb amputation in adult rats, neurons in layer IV of rat first somatosensory cortex (SI) in the forepaw barrel subfield (FBS) associated with the representation of the forepaw became responsive to new input from the shoulder (Pearson et al. 1999). These new shoulder-responsive sites in deafferented FBS had longer evoked response latencies than did sites in the shoulder representation located in the posterior part of the trunk subfield, hereafter referred to as the original shoulder representation. Furthermore, projection neurons in the original shoulder representation in both intact and deafferented adults did not extend their axons into the FBS, and ablation of the original shoulder representation cortex and/or the second somatosensory cortex (SII) failed to eliminate new shoulder input in the deafferented FBS (Pearson et al. 2001). These results led us to conclude that large-scale reorganization in FBS quite likely involved a subcortical substrate. In addition, the time course for large-scale cortical reorganization following forelimb amputation was unknown, and this information could shed light on potential mechanisms for large-scale cortical reorganization. In the present study, we extended our previous findings of large-scale cortical reorganization in the FBS by investigating the time course for reorganization following forelimb amputation. The major findings are: a) deafferented forelimb cortex remained unresponsive to shoulder stimulation during the 1st week following forelimb amputation; b) new responses to shoulder stimulation were first observed in deafferented forelimb cortex 2-3 weeks after forelimb amputation; however, the new shoulder input was restricted to locations in the former forearm cortex; c) islet(s) of new shoulder representation were first observed in deafferented FBS 4 weeks after amputation; these islets occupied a larger percentage of FBS in subsequent weeks; d) portions of FBS remained unresponsive as many as 4 months after deafferentation (maximum time examined between amputation and recording); and e) the increase in total size of the shoulder representation appeared to result from the establishment of new shoulder representations that were often discontinuous from the original shoulder representation. These findings provide evidence that forelimb amputation results in delayed reorganization of the FBS and we describe possible mechanisms and substrates underlying the reorganization.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2005

Bilateral and unilateral shoulder girdle kinematics during humeral elevation.

BACKGROUND: Due to the complexity of the shoulder mechanism, shoulder complex models to describe the reachable workspace generally lack information on shoulder girdle kinematics. METHODS: Shoulder girdle kinematic data were recorded using an optoelectronic tracking device. Five male and five female healthy subjects performed bilateral and unilateral humeral elevation in four planes anterior and posterior to the body. RESULTS: Bilateral and unilateral shoulder girdle kinematics during humeral elevation were substantially different. Bilateral shoulder movements led to a smaller workspace and larger contractions-elongations. Similar patterns of shoulder girdle elevation and retraction accompanying humeral elevation appeared in all measured planes, known as the shoulder rhythm. The shoulder girdle changes its length as a quadratic function during humeral elevation. The shoulder girdle angular motion range is the largest in the non-elevated humerus position, it is reduced during humeral elevation and halves in humerus maximal elevated position. CONCLUSIONS: To describe motions of the shoulder complex, a model is proposed composed of an inner joint representing shoulder girdle joints and an outer joint representing the glenohumeral joint. RELEVANCE: The proposed model offers the possibility to compare movement of shoulders with disorders to a normal pattern. It can also provide a basis for shoulder complex kinematic modeling, biomechanical analysis, motion characteristics and exact calculation of the humerus reachable workspace.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗
PubMed2005

[Shoulder function and scores in 180 asymptomatic individuals aged over 75 years].

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study was to define the normal shoulder in patients aged over 75 years and to look for correlations between general health, mental status and shoulder function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Shoulder motion, rotator cuff strength and abnormal movements were evaluated in 180 subjects over 75 without surgical history involving the shoulder. Body mass index (BMI) was determined for each subject. The Simple Shoulder Test (SST) was performed and the Constant and Murley score was calculated for each shoulder. The Beck test was used to assess depression. When joint function was impaired, supplementary x-ray and ultrasound examinations were performed. RESULTS: Asymptomatic pathological features (rotator cuff tears, stiffness, degenerative joint disease) were identified in 56% of the shoulders. Only 44% of the shoulders were free of pathological features. 56.4% of rotator cuff tears were found in the dominant shoulder; 13.9% of subjects had bilateral degenerative joint disease; 23.3% had bilateral stiffness. There were many associated conditions: cardiovascular (33%), pulmonary (28%), gastrointestinal (25.6%), diabetes (12.2%), tumors (10.6%). 18.3% of the subjects were depressive and 14.4% were taking treatment for depression. Shoulder motion and strength were correlated with BMI and nutritional status. Thin subjects (BMI < 20) had more rotator cuff tears. Obese subjects (BMI > 29.9) had more degenerative joint disease and joint stiffness. Demand for treatment and examinations were greater among depressed subjects. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Shoulder function is compatible with normal lifestyle in subjects over 75, corresponding to their desires and expectations. Shoulder function is correlated with body mass index and mental status. We should carefully assess shoulders in elderly subjects because good shoulder function, even if impaired, is often compatible with moderate stiffness, mild osteoarthritis, and rotator cuff tears, with no particular need for surgery.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2002

Scapular behavior in shoulder impingement syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the contribution of each scapular rotation to the scapular total range of motion (ROM) in both shoulders of persons with a unilateral shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS), to compare 3-dimensional (3D) scapular attitudes of their symptomatic and asymptomatic shoulders in flexion and in abduction, and to characterize the scapular behavior of these subjects by classifying them into subgroups based on scapular tilting differences between their symptomatic and asymptomatic shoulders. DESIGN: Comparisons of 3D scapular attitudes, scapular total ROM, and percentage of contributions of each scapular rotation to the scapular total ROM. SETTING: A motricity laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-one subjects, including 41 with a SIS (29 had an asymptomatic contralateral shoulder) and 10 healthy subjects. INTERVENTIONS: The 3D scapular attitudes were calculated with the subjects in a standardized seated position; with the arm at rest; or at 70 degrees, 90 degrees, and 110 degrees of shoulder flexion and abduction. Axial rotation angles were calculated using a fixed set of Cardanic angles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At 90 degrees of arm elevation, data from 10 shoulders of healthy subjects were used to set up normative values (99% confidence interval of mean 3D scapular attitudes) to compare with 3D scapular attitudes of symptomatic and asymptomatic shoulders of SIS subjects. We analyzed the scapula behavior of subjects with SIS and classified them into subgroups based on scapular anterior tilting asymmetry. RESULTS: In flexion, almost half of the scapular total ROM was provided by anterior tilting (48.2%-51.3%), whereas in abduction, external rotation (40.3%-42.4%) was the main contributor. Scapular total ROM was higher in abduction than in flexion in all arm positions for both shoulder groups (P <.01). Also, 3D scapular attitude patterns of both shoulders of SIS subjects were different from those of healthy subjects. At 90 degrees, scapular asymmetry in anterior tilting allowed us to classify SIS subjects with respect to more (lead) or less (lag) scapular tilting in the affected side (P <.0001) or no difference (P =.11) between the sides (symmetrical). No significant differences (P >.05), except for a small 2 degrees difference in transverse rotation during arm flexion at 110 degrees (P =.002), were observed in 3D scapular attitudes and scapular total ROM between both shoulders of SIS subjects. Patterns of 3D scapular attitudes and scapular total ROM were significantly different between flexion and abduction arm positions (P <.05). CONCLUSIONS: The contribution of rotations and scapular total ROM differed according to the plane of arm elevation in SIS subjects. Group analyses revealed no differences in 3D scapular attitudes between symptomatic and asymptomatic shoulders of subjects with unilateral SIS. This could be caused by the use, in SIS subjects, of inappropriate neuromuscular strategies affecting both shoulders. However, individual analyses revealed scapular asymmetry in the sagittal plane, which suggests that SIS subjects with less anterior tilting in the symptomatic shoulder, as compared with the asymptomatic contralateral one, may be at high risk of developing chronic SIS. This last finding provides scientific evidence to focus rehabilitation protocols toward a restoration of anterior tilting.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Predictive factors for neck and shoulder pain: a longitudinal study in young adults.

STUDY DESIGN: A longitudinal study. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence and incidence of neck and shoulder pain in young adults and to identify the associated and predictive factors of neck and shoulder pain based on 7-year follow-up. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several work-related, psychosocial, and sociodemographic factors have been verified as being related to neck and shoulder pain in adult populations, but far fewer longitudinal studies concerning the topic have been carried out in young populations. METHODS: A random sample of 826 high school students was investigated when they were 15 to 18 years old and again at 22 to 25 years of age. Altogether, 394 (48%) patients participated in both surveys. The outcome variable was weekly neck and shoulder pain during the past 6 months in adulthood, and the explanatory variables included some sociodemographic factors, leisure time activities, self-assessed physical condition, psychosomatic stress symptoms, and symptoms of fatigue and sleep difficulties. RESULTS: In 7 years, the prevalence of weekly neck and shoulder pain increased from 17% to 28%. Among those who were asymptomatic at baseline, 6-month incidence of occasional or weekly neck and shoulder pain was 59% 7 years later. In an adjusted model, psychosomatic symptoms remained an associated factor for prevalent neck and shoulder pain 7 years later for both females and males. In females, neck and shoulder pain in adolescence was associated with prevalent neck and shoulder pain in adulthood, and sports loading dynamically in the upper extremities was an associated factor for a low prevalence of neck and shoulder pain 7 years later. In separate analyses of incident neck and shoulder pain, psychosomatic stress symptoms predicted neck and shoulder pain in adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: In young adults, the incidence of neck and shoulder pain is high, and the associated factors of neck and shoulder pain are already multifactorial in a young population.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Arthroscopic evaluation of acute initial anterior shoulder dislocations.

Arthroscopic evaluation of patients with an acute anterior shoulder dislocation was done to identify and classify the intraarticular lesions that might predict recurrent dislocations. Forty-five shoulders fit the following criteria for inclusion in our study: initial dislocation with no prior history of shoulder problems; confirmation of the dislocation radiographically or reduction by a physician; and arthroscopy within 10 days. The 42 men and 3 women had an average age of 21.2 years (range, 14 to 28 years). Mechanism of injury was a twisting of the arm into forced abduction and external rotation, a fall on the outstretched arm, or a direct blow to the shoulder. Based on this preliminary study of 45 shoulders, we present a classification of the lesions found in the acute shoulder dislocation. Group 1 (six shoulders) had capsular tears with no labral lesions: these shoulders were stable under anesthesia and had no or minimal hemarthrosis. Group 2 (11 shoulders) had capsular tears and partial labral detachments: these shoulders were mildly unstable and had mild to moderate hemarthrosis. Group 3 (28 shoulders) had capsular tears with labral detachments: these shoulders were grossly unstable and had large hemarthrosis. They had complete capsular/labral detachments. In the past, redislocation rates have been primarily related to age at the time of initial dislocation and, to a lesser degree, the period of immobilization. We have identified the intraarticular lesions in 45 patients with an initial anterior glenohumeral dislocation and classified these shoulders into three groups based on the lesions found. By doing so, we can develop a more accurate method of determining which shoulders are prone to recurrent dislocation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Arthroscopic capsular release for the treatment of refractory postoperative or post-fracture shoulder stiffness.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic capsular release is used to treat idiopathic adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) that is refractory to nonoperative treatment or manipulation under anesthesia. The role of arthroscopic capsular release in the treatment of frozen shoulder after shoulder surgery or fracture is less clearly understood. The purposes of this study were to define the outcome of arthroscopic capsular release in the management of frozen shoulder after surgery or fracture and to compare these results with those of arthroscopic capsular release in the treatment of idiopathic frozen shoulder. METHODS: We evaluated the results of arthroscopic capsular release in three different groups of patients with shoulder contracture refractory to nonoperative management and manipulation under anesthesia. The three groups consisted of patients who had an idiopathic frozen shoulder, shoulder stiffness after surgery, or shoulder stiffness after fracture. We evaluated pain, function, patient satisfaction, and range of motion in all three groups before and after the study treatment. RESULTS: At a mean of twenty months (range, twelve to forty-six months) after the operation, fifty patients were available for assessment of function and range of motion of the involved shoulder. At the time of follow-up, each group had a significant improvement in the scores for pain, patient satisfaction, and functional activity as well as in the overall outcome score (p < 0.01). Comparison of the scores among the different groups revealed that all had a similar degree of improvement in range of motion of the involved shoulder, but patients with postoperative frozen shoulder had significantly (p < 0.05) lower scores for pain (p < 0.03), patient satisfaction (p < 0.004), and functional activity (p < 0.002) than did those with idiopathic or post-fracture frozen shoulder. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic capsular release was as effective for improving range of motion in patients with postoperative contracture of the shoulder as it was in patients with idiopathic and post-fracture contracture. However, there was less improvement in the subjective scores for pain, function, and patient satisfaction in the postoperative group.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1995

Biomechanical analysis of the shoulder during tennis activities.

Biomechanical analysis of the shoulder in tennis is still in early stages; however, the available data do allow some conclusions and some recommendations for conditioning, evaluation, and rehabilitation. Normal shoulder biomechanical function requires an intact kinetic chain to create the energy, produce the forces and stabilize the joint in tennis activities. Only through this mechanism can optimum performance with minimal injury risk be maintained. Conditioning of the shoulder for tennis should take this into account. Exercises should involve force generation by the large leg and trunk muscles, scapular stabilization, and closed chain co-contraction activity for the shoulder stabilizers. Similarly, clinical evaluation for shoulder problems must include assessment of areas distant to the shoulder. Kinetic chain failure can cause extra stress on the shoulder, causing or exacerbating clinical symptoms at the shoulder. Clinical evaluation of shoulder joint structures also is enhanced by knowledge of the integration of the constraint systems, and the fact that more than one system may be involved in shoulder pathology. Finally, rehabilitation efforts for shoulder problems need to focus on allowing functional return of the shoulder joint in the context of the entire kinetic chain of tennis specific activity. Rehabilitation of all areas of kinetic chain failure, such as trunk inflexibility or scapulothoracic dyskinesis, should be undertaken in conjunction with rehabilitation techniques for the shoulder. The sports medicine clinician will have a more functional framework for assessing shoulder activity and injury in tennis through the understanding of these biomechanical principles.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗