Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Programs”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources

Coordination of benefits in dental prepayment programs: Council on Dental Care Programs.

The 1979 House of Delegates adopted Resolution 49H which directed the Council on Dental Care Programs to initiate discussion with the Health Insurance Association of America, Delta Dental Plans Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Associations, and the Health Care Financing Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, to develop suitable inexpensive, uniform procedures for the Coordination of Benefits of Prepaid Dental Programs. Additionally, the Council was directed to disseminate these procedures to the membership through Association publications. The following is a report detailing the results of the Council's activities.

Humans↗

Voluntary programs: ADA Seal program and international implications.

For about 130 years the American Dental Association (ADA) has aided the profession and the public in selecting safe and effective dental products. Since 1930, dental products have been evaluated through the ADA Seal program. In accordance with the ADA's Bylaws, the Council on Scientific Affairs assesses information evaluating the safety, efficacy, appropriate use, and promotional claims of dental products. In doing so, the Council may award the ADA's Seal of Acceptance. In collaboration with interested parties, expert consultants, and Council members, the ADA produces guidelines suggesting appropriate methodologies and submission data to assist manufacturers in voluntarily earning the Seal of Acceptance. To date, numerous professional and consumer products have been evaluated, and about 1,300 of these products bear the Association's Seal of Acceptance. When a product is awarded the Seal it means that adequate data have been submitted and reviewed and, based on available information, the product meets ADA guidelines of safety and effectiveness. Dental health care professionals and consumers who use products that have the Seal can be confident that a product's properties and performance are consistent with current professional standards and manufacturers' claims. The ADA Seal program serves to help dentists and manufacturers meet their ethical obligations to the public by promoting safe and effective health care products.

American Dental Association↗

The rural dental health program: the effect of a school-based, dental health education program on children's utilization of dental services.

Eighteen-hundred rural children ages five through thirteen were randomly assigned for dental treatment to a school-based practice, and to private practitioners in the community. Simultaneously, five of the nine public schools attended by the children offered an enriched program of dental education while the remaining schools taught the regular health education courses. All children participated in a school based fluoride program and their dental treatment was provided without charge. Data indicating how the children utilized dental services were collected over the three-year treatment phase of the study. Evidence from the third treatment year indicates that children assigned to the school based practice who also attended a school offering enriched dental health education used dental services on a more regular basis than children in the other three groups. Evidence obtained from log-linear modeling supports the hypothesis that dental health education had a positive effect on children's utilization of dental service.

Adolescent↗

Survey of cause-of-death query criteria used by state vital statistics programs in the US and the efficacy of the criteria used by the Oregon Vital Statistics Program.

A survey of the 52 vital statistics registration areas in the United States revealed that at least 23 did not fulfill the minimum cause-of-death query guidelines recommended by the National Center for Health Statistics. The Oregon Center for Health Statistics is one of only a few that query certifying physicians at a comprehensive level. During August 1986-July 1987, a total of 2,453 of 23,238 death certificates were returned to the certifiers for additional information, not including those returned in a tobacco use study. More than one-half (56.1 per cent) resulted in new and more specific underlying cause-of-death data. Only 5.2 per cent of the queries were unanswered. One probable result of Oregon's program is that the state has the highest percentage of liver cirrhosis and disease deaths attributed to alcohol abuse in the United States. Nationally, 41.7 per cent of all liver disease and cirrhosis deaths in 1984 were listed as due to alcohol compared to 82.4 per cent in Oregon. The state's total liver cirrhosis and disease death rate (12.0 per 100,000 population) is only marginally higher than the United States rate (11.6). The query program also serves to locate maternal deaths that would otherwise not be reported, as well as to provide more accurate cause-of-death statistics in general.

Cause of Death↗

Pawtucket Heart Health Program point-of-purchase nutrition education program in supermarkets.

Point-of-purchase nutrition education in supermarkets is one intervention strategy of the Pawtucket Heart Health Program, a community cardiovascular disease prevention program in Pawtucket, Rhode Island. Using consumer intercept interviews, awareness of shelf labels and their effect on purchase behavior have been continuously evaluated. Between 1984 and 1988, the percent of shoppers who could identify correct labels increased from 11 percent to 24 percent (95% confidence intervals of difference: 7.17). The percent who reported they were encouraged to purchase the identified foods increased from 36 percent to 54 percent (95% CI of difference: 5.41).

Adult↗

The Diabetes Prevention Program: baseline characteristics of the randomized cohort. The Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group.

OBJECTIVE: The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) is a 27-center randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of interventions that may delay or prevent development of diabetes in people at increased risk for type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Eligibility requirements were age > or = 25 years, BMI > or = 24 kg/m2 (> or = 22 kg/m2 for Asian-Americans), and impaired glucose tolerance plus a fasting plasma glucose of 5.3-6.9 mmol/l (or < or = 6.9 mmol for American Indians). Randomization of participants into the DPP over 2.7 years ended in June 1999. Baseline data for the three treatment groups--intensive lifestyle modification, standard care plus metformin, and standard care plus placebo--are presented for the 3,234 participants who have been randomized. RESULTS: Of all participants, 55% were Caucasian, 20% were African-American, 16% were Hispanic, 5% were American Indian, and 4% were Asian-American. Their average age at entry was 51 +/- 10.7 years (mean +/- SD), and 67.7% were women. Moreover, 16% were < 40 years of age, and 20% were > or = 60 years of age. Of the women, 48% were postmenopausal. Men and women had similar frequencies of history of hypercholesterolemia (37 and 33%, respectively) or hypertension (29 and 26%, respectively). On the basis of fasting lipid determinations, 54% of men and 40% of women fit National Cholesterol Education Program criteria for abnormal lipid profiles. More men than women were current or former cigarette smokers or had a history of coronary heart disease. Furthermore, 66% of men and 71% of women had a first-degree relative with diabetes. Overall, BMI averaged 34.0 +/- 6.7 kg/m2 at baseline with 57% of the men and 73% of women having a BMI > or = 30 kg/m2. Average fasting plasma glucose (6.0 +/- 0.5 mmol/l) and HbA1c (5.9 +/- 0.5%) in men were comparable with values in women (5.9 +/- 0.4 mmol/l and 5.9 +/- 0.5%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The DPP has successfully randomized a large cohort of participants with a wide distribution of age, obesity, and ethnic and racial backgrounds who are at high risk for developing type 2 diabetes. The study will examine the effects of interventions on the development of diabetes.

Adult↗

Relationship of nursing program predictors and success on the NCLEX-RN examination for licensure in a selected associate degree program.

This ex post facto correlational study sought to determine the relationship of selected admission criteria and performance in the integrated nursing major didactic courses of an associate science in nursing degree program as predictors for performance on the licensing examination for registered nurses. A significant positive relationship at .01 with NCLEX was individually demonstrated with all of the seven ASN nursing courses and with SAT verbal scores. Not significant were age at graduation from the program, high school class rank percentile, and SAT math scores. Multivariate regression weights derived from an equation using course grades of 104 graduates were used to predict NCLEX scores. The predicted scores correlated strongly (n = .78551, p less than .001) with the actual scores. Ten predicted and actual scores were provided for demonstration.

Achievement↗

Wellness and prevention programs as internal marketing programs for hospitals: the current status.

Employee wellness programs are demonstrating promise in helping abate America's health care cost crisis. It also would appear natural for hospitals to play a leadership role in the important development of this new product category in health care marketing. By offering Health Care Programs to employees, hospitals could develop and improve several offerings. This study investigates the nature of the problem and extent of employee wellness leadership provided by hospitals as compared to 900 other companies and organizations representative of American industry. Hospitals may provide the appearance of leadership through volume of services offered but may falter in the reasoning behind such services and financial commitments for further development.

Employee Incentive Plans↗

Federal Employees Health Benefits Program: limitation on inpatient hospital charges and FEHB program payments--OPM. Interim regulation with request for comments.

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing an interim regulation that implements section 7002(f) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (5 U.S.C. 8904(b)). The law sets a limit on the charges and Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program benefit payments for certain inpatient hospital services received by a retired enrolled individual. This regulation defines a retired enrolled individual and sets forth the circumstances under which the limit on charges and FEHB Program benefit payments takes effect.

Government Agencies↗

Medicaid program; coordination of Medicaid with Special Supplemental Food program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)--HCFA. Final regulations.

This rule requires State Medicaid agencies to coordinate the operation of the Medicaid program with the State's operation of the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) under section 17 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966. State Medicaid agencies also are required to notify certain individuals of WIC benefits and refer them to the local WIC agencies. This requirement ensures that all Medicaid-eligible individuals who might be WIC-eligible are aware of WIC benefits and how to obtain them. The rule implements section 6406 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989.

Adult↗

Clinical Laboratories Improvement Act program; granting and withdrawal of deeming authority to private nonprofit accreditation organizations and of CLIA exemption under state laboratory programs--HCFA. Final rule.

This rule permits HCFA to approve or disapprove accreditation organizations and State laboratory programs and thereby determine that laboratories accredited by a HCFA-approved private, nonprofit accreditation organization are deemed to meet the requirements set forth in 42 CFR part 493 of the regulations, which implement section 353 of the Public Health Service Act (PHSA) or, in the case of State laboratory programs, are exempt from the requirements. Section 353 of the PHSA was enacted by the Clinical Laboratories Improvement Act of 1967 (CLIA '67) and was amended by the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA).

Accreditation↗

Primary care program improves reimbursement. The Federally Qualified Health Center program helps hospitals improve services to the medically indigent.

Under a program created by Congress in 1989, certain primary care treatment centers serving the medically and economically indigent can become Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs). Recently enacted rules and regulations allow participants in the FQHC program to receive 100 percent reasonable cost reimbursement for Medicaid services and 80 percent for Medicare services. An all-inclusive annual cost report is the basis for determining reimbursement rates. The report factors in such expenses as physician and other healthcare and professional salaries and benefits, medical supplies, certain equipment depreciation, and overhead for facility and administrative costs. Both Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement is based on an encounter rate, and states employ various methodologies to determine the reimbursement level. In Illinois, for example, typical reimbursement for a qualified encounter ranges from $70 to $88. To obtain FQHC status, an organization must demonstrate community need, deliver the appropriate range of healthcare services, satisfy management and finance requirements, and function under a community-based governing board. In addition, an FQHC must provide primary healthcare by physicians and (where appropriate) midlevel practitioners; it must also offer its community diagnostic laboratory and x-ray services, preventive healthcare and dental care, case management, pharmacy services, and arrangements for emergency services. Because FQHCs must be freestanding facilities, establishing them can trigger a number of ancillary legal issues, such as those involved in forming a new corporation, complying with not-for-profit corporation regulations, applying for tax-exempt status, and applying for various property and sales tax exemptions. Hospitals that establish FQHCs must also be prepared to relinquish direct control over the delivery of primary care services.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.↗

Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services (CHAMPUS); continued health care benefit program--DoD. Interim rule.

This rule establishes a Continued Health Care Benefit Program (CHCBP) for certain DoD health care beneficiaries who lose eligibility for health care in the Military Health Services System (MHSS). It provides for use of the CHAMPUS benefit structure and CHAMPUS rules and procedures for the CHCBP and seeks public comments on our plan to implement the Continued Health Care Benefit Program.

Eligibility Determination↗

Medicaid program; drug use review program and electronic claims management system for outpatient drug claims--HCFA. Final rule.

This final rule revises some of the regulatory requirements for the drug use review (DUR) program for covered outpatient drugs furnished to recipients under the Medicaid program. The regulatory requirements became effective on January 2, 1993, as a result of an interim final rule with comment period that we published on November 2, 1992. Specifically, these revisions-- Clarify the definitions of overutilization, underutilization, consensus process, peer-reviewed literature, adverse medical result, adverse drug-drug interaction, appropriate and medically necessary, and individual medical history; Change the requirements for licensure of DUR board members, and telephone counseling arrangements for mail order pharmacies; Include non-prescription drugs in the consideration of alteration of therapeutic effect; Require hospitals to give assurances that they have met the requirements of the statute before claiming the hospital exemption from DUR; Specify the issues that State agencies must address when formulating counseling standards; Clarify the bases for DUR board recommendations; Clarify the distinction between DUR and surveillance and utilization review (SUR); and Make certain technical and editorial corrections. The November 1992 interim final rule with comment period incorporated and interpreted certain provisions of section 4401 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.↗

Medicare and Medicaid programs; recognition of the American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities, Inc. for Ambulatory Surgical Centers Program--HCFA. Proposed notice.

In this notice we announce the receipt of an application from the American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities, Inc. (AAAASF) for recognition as a national accreditation program for ambulatory surgical centers that wish to participate in the Medicare or Medicaid programs. The Social Security Act requires that the Secretary publish a notice identifying the national accreditation body making the request, describing the nature of the request, and providing a 30 day public comment period.

Accreditation↗

Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services (CHAMPUS); TRICARE Program; reimbursement--DoD. Final rule.

This final rule revises certain requirements and procedures for reimbursement under the CHAMPUS program, the purpose of which is to implement a comprehensive managed health care delivery system composed of military medical treatment facilities and CHAMPUS. Issues addressed in this rule include: implementation of changes made to the Medicare Prospective Payment System (PPS) upon which the CHAMPUS DRG-based payment system is modeled and required by law to follow wherever practicable, along with changes to make our DRG-based payment system operate better; clarification of payment reduction for noncompliance with required utilization of publication of list of ambulatory surgery procedures; limitation on ambulatory surgery group payment rates; extension of the balance billing limitations currently in place for individual and professional providers to non-institutional, non-professional providers; adjustment of the CHAMPUS maximum allowable charge (CMAC) rate in the small number of cases where the CMAC rate is less than the Medicare rate; implementation of the government-wide debarment rule where any provider excluded or suspended from CHAMPUS shall be excluded from all other programs and activities involving Federal financial assistance, such as Medicare or Medicaid; elimination of the requirement for non-participating providers to file claims; and revision of the ambulatory surgery cost-share information to enable the cost-share to be assessed against the facility claim instead of the primary surgeon's claim.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.↗