Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PEPTIC ULCER PERFORATION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

[Prognostic risk factors in patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcer. A retrospective analysis of critical factors of mortality and morbidity in a series of 40 patients who underwent simple closure surgery].

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify factors affecting mortality and morbidity in patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcer. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: University Hospital, Italy. PATIENTS: Forty patients consecutively operated on for perforated peptic ulcer by simple suture procedure performed either by laparotomy (n = 26) or laparoscopic (n = 14) approach. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mortality was 20% (n = 8) and morbidity in survivors was 25% (n = 8). Compared to survivors, non-survivors were older (mean age 79.3 yrs. vs 60.0 yrs., p < 0.01), had worse APACHE II and SAPS scores (mean 20.1 vs 8.5, p < 0.001; and 13.1 vs. 5.5, p < 0.0001 respectively), were treated later (mean interval from outbreak of symptoms to surgery 30.8 hrs. vs. 11.1 hrs., p < 0.01), and the size of their perforation was larger (mean 15.1 mm. vs. 8.6 mm, p < 0.05). The laparoscopic approach was the only factor that significantly was associated with morbidity in survivors (p < 0.01). The presence of at least two risk factors, enhanced the probability of death. CONCLUSION: Old age, great APACHE II and SAPS scores, delay in treatment and large size of the perforation were associated significantly to mortality in perforated peptic ulcer patients. Efforts should be made perioperatively for patients having these risk factors.

APACHE↗
PubMed2001

Predicting mortality and morbidity of patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcers.

HYPOTHESIS: Since the early 1990s, the laparoscopic technique has been increasingly used for the treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. It is important to validate a risk scoring system that can stratify patients into various risk groups before comparing the treatment outcome of laparoscopic repair against that of conventional open surgery. The scoring system should be able to predict the likelihood of mortality and morbidity. Boey score and APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) score may be of use in patient stratification. DESIGN: Retrospective review of relevant case notes by one reviewer. SETTING: A teaching hospital treating 0. 5 million to 1 million patients during the study period. PATIENTS: Patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcer between January 1989 and December 1998. Patients treated conservatively were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality and postoperative complications (morbidity). RESULTS: A total of 436 patients (365 male and 71 female) with a mean +/- SD age of 51.5 +/- 18.3 years (range, 14-92 years) were studied. Duodenal perforation accounted for 344 (78.9%) of 436 cases. The mortality rate was 7.8% (34/436), and 89 patients had postoperative complications. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only the APACHE II score predicted both mortality and morbidity. Although the Boey score predicted mortality, it failed to predict morbidity. However, the Boey score predicted the chance of conversion in patients undergoing laparoscopic repair. CONCLUSIONS: The APACHE II score may be a useful tool for stratifying patients into various risk groups, and the Boey score might select appropriate patients for laparoscopic repair.

APACHE↗
PubMed2001

Has the incidence of perforated peptic ulcer decreased over the last decade?

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic use of new drugs for inhibiting gastric secretion together with Helicobacter pylori antimicrobe therapy has given rise to controversy over the current incidence of perforated peptic ulcer (gastroduodenal peptic ulcer, GDPU). The aim of this study is to analyze the incidence of ulcer perforation over the last 12 years in our health area and the influence of new medical treatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our series includes 246 patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcer during a 12-year period (January 1987 to December 1998) in our health area. The mean patient age was 55.2 +/- 18.1 (16-93) years, and there was a predominance of males (199/246; 80.9%). The ulcer was located fundamentally in the pylorus (48.3%) and duodenal bulb (39.1%), and the most frequent surgical technique was bilateral truncal vagotomy associated with pyloroplasty (85.3%). RESULTS: During the 1987-1992 period, 152 patients underwent surgery, whereas 94 patients were operated on between 1993 and 1998, which reveals a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). Furthermore, if we divide the study into four 3-year periods (1987-1989, 1990-1992, 1993-1995 and 1996-1998), we see that there were 74 and 78 GDPUs in the first two periods, with no statistical differences between each other, and 48 and 46 cases in the last two periods, also with no statistical differences between each other, but statistically significant when compared to the first two periods. CONCLUSION: The incidence of perforated GDPU has dropped by half over the last 6 years due fundamentally to the use of proton pump inhibitors.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Changing patterns in perforated peptic ulcer disease.

We reviewed our experience with 88 consecutive patients (49 men and 39 women) treated for perforated peptic ulcer between January 1983 and May 1988. The mean age was 61 years (range, 15-89); 63 per cent were more than 60 years of age and 44 per cent were more than 70 years of age. One third of patients had a prior history of peptic ulcer disease. Thirty-nine patients (44%) were taking ulcerogenic drugs (28 were using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 6 were using steroids alone, and 5 were using both). Twenty-eight patients (32%) were taking antacid/H2-blockers, including 15 patients with history of ulcer disease and 11 patients taking ulcerogenic drugs. Concurrent systemic diseases were present in 63 per cent of patients; 12 patients were hospitalized for other illnesses at the time of perforation. Abdominal pain was the chief complaint in 83 patients (94%) and 52 patients (59%) had peritonitis. Leukocytosis was present in 49 patients (56%). Pneumoperitoneum was noted in 65 per cent. The duodenal bulb was the site of perforation in 62 per cent, the pyloric region in 20 per cent, and the gastric body in 18 per cent. A definitive ulcer procedure (V + P, V + A) was performed in 32 patients (38%); 51 patients (58%) had plication, and the remaining five patients did not undergo surgery. A delay in diagnosis and therapy of less than 24 hours occurred in 20 (23%) patients. Mortality was 24 per cent, and correlated significantly with age more than 60 years, but not with treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Acute gastroduodenal peptic ulcer perforation: contrast-enhanced and thin-section spiral CT findings in 10 patients.

BACKGROUND: To describe contrast-enhanced and thin-section spiral computed tomography (SCT) findings in patients with acute gastroduodenal peptic ulcer perforation (GPUP). METHODS: Abdominal SCTs in 10 patients with confirmed acute perforated gastroduodenal (GD) peptic ulcer were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were 24-76 years old (mean = 44 years); seven were men and three were women. Diagnosis of GD peptic ulcer was done by endoscopy or surgery. Eleven ulcers were identified, two in the antrum and nine in the duodenum. SCTs were obtained after intravenous contrast medium without oral administration. Slice thickness was 3 or 5 mm. CT findings were correlated with surgical (n = 5) or endoscopic (n = 5) findings. RESULTS: Eight patients had pneumoperitoneum. All patients had evidence of GD wall thickening and enhancement and inflammatory changes in perigastroduodenal soft tissues or organs. Discontinuity in the GD wall and/or tiny air bubbles in close proximity indicated the site of perforation in eight cases. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal SCT enables diagnosis and location of GPUP. A well-controlled prospective study with a larger group is needed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of this technique.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Perforated peptic ulcer at the J.G. Strijdom Hospital. A retrospective study of 99 patients.

This is a retrospective analysis of 99 patients with perforated peptic ulcer treated in the Department of Surgery at the J. G. Strijdom Hospital over a 6-year period. The incidence of this condition is increasing in our population. The mortality rate for perforated peptic ulcer remains high (12.1%). Forty-three per cent of our patients were suffering from a major medical illness at the time of perforation, with a mortality rate of 25.6%. The mortality rate for relatively fit patients was 1.8%. While more conservative surgery is indicated for high-risk patients, a definitive ulcer operation can be performed safely in patients who are not suffering from a major medical illness. Our selective operative policy is discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Laparoendoscopic approach to perforated peptic ulcer: case report and discussion.

The laparoscope provides an alternative approach to the operative management of a perforated peptic ulcer. Although the laparoscope has already proven to be an effective adjunct in the treatment of chronic peptic ulcer disease, its role in the treatment of perforated ulcers remains to be proven. This article reviews the technique of laparoscopic exploration of the abdomen with vagotomy and Graham repair in a patient who presented with a perforated pyloric channel ulcer.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Predicting poor outcome in perforated peptic ulcer disease.

BACKGROUND: Despite modern medications for peptic ulcers, patients frequently require emergency surgery for complications of ulcer disease. Many of these patients have coexisting medical problems which not only predispose to perforated ulcer disease, but also influence the clinical outcome. This study reviews the outcome of a group of patients with perforated ulcer disease and examines the influence of a range of comorbidity factors on the outcome. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all cases of perforated peptic occurring over a period of 9 years. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-nine perforated peptic ulcers in 147 patients were diagnosed between 1987 and 1996. Coexisting malignancy, use of immunosuppressives or corticosteroids, pre-operative shock and admission to intensive care were all significantly associated with reperforation by univariate analysis. However, logistic regression analysis indicated that none of these factors independently predicted reperforation which, therefore, occurs as a multifactorial event with all the above factors contributing. Death from perforated ulcer disease was related to pre-operative shock, malignancy, admission to intensive care and reperforation when examined by univariate analysis. Furthermore, logistic regression analysis showed that coexisting malignancy and reperforation were significant predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Perforated peptic ulcer disease remains a frequent clinical problem in patients with short dyspeptic histories, who may or may not have been using ulcerogenic medications. It is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among an often aged and otherwise unwell group of patients. Patients with underlying malignant disease, who may be immunosuppressed with corticosteroids or cytotoxics, are at increased risk of dying from perforated ulcer disease. Reperforation of an ulcer, following simple closure or conservative treatment, is also highly predictive of increased mortality.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Intramural abscess of the duodenum resulting from perforated peptic ulcer.

Even in this age of effective medical treatment for peptic ulcers, their complications remain the same. Many require prompt surgical intervention. We present an unusual case of postbulbar duodenal ulcer complicated by intramural perforation and abscess formation. Such complications have a high mortality rate because of frequent delays in diagnosis and treatment caused by a lack of peritoneal signs or other specific clinical findings.

Abscess↗
PubMed1992

Risk factors in perforated peptic ulcer disease: comparison of a new score system with the Mannheim Peritonitis Index.

OBJECTIVE: To construct a score that would accurately predict outcome for patients with perforated peptic ulcers. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University Hospital. SUBJECTS: 173 patients who were operated on for perforated peptic duodenal ulcers over a 14 year period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Results of multivariate discriminant function analysis of derived set of clinical variables known to be associated with high mortality, and comparison with the Mannheim Peritonitis Index. RESULTS: Serious coexisting medical illness, acute renal failure, white cell count of more than 20 x 10(9)/l, and male sex were the most significant factors influencing mortality. The Hacettepe score for perforated peptic ulcer was established using these four variables. The sensitivity was 83%, the specificity 94%, and the overall predictive accuracy 93%. The corresponding figures for the Mannheim Peritonitis Index were 75%, 96%, and 94% respectively. CONCLUSION: The Hacettepe score is useful in predicting whether a patient will survive after perforation of a peptic duodenal ulcer.

Chi-Square Distribution↗
PubMed1982

Cimetidine and perforated peptic ulcer.

Cimetidine is thought to have accelerated the reduction in elective peptic ulcer surgery but its effect on the incidence of perforated peptic ulcer has not been reported. A 15-year (1966-1980) review of peptic ulcer surgery in a district general hospital is presented. Since cimetidine became available (November 1976), the mean annual number of elective operations has fallen from 91.4 to 50.5 (45 per cent reduction). The number of perforations has fallen from 40.6 to 36.5 (10 per cent reduction). One hundred and five patients treated for perforation (97 duodenal, 8 gastric) from 1978 to 1980 were reviewed in detail. Of the 64 patients with a chronic ulcer, 8 were taking cimetidine when their ulcers perforated and a further 8 had been on the drug previously. Cimetidine has substantially reduced elective peptic ulcer surgery. There appears to have been no equivalent reduction in the incidence of perforation.

Cimetidine↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Operative laparoscopy in the management of perforated peptic ulcer].

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the feasibility, safety and efficacy of the laparoscopic approach in the management of perforated peptic ulcers. From January 1997 to December 2002, all patients referred to our community hospital for abdominal surgical emergencies were routinely managed by laparoscopic surgery. A review was carried out on 39 consecutive patients suffering from perforated peptic ulcers with or without generalised peritonitis. The study population comprised 24 male and 15 female patients, aged 30 to 94 years (mean age: 62 +/- 18). Laparoscopic repair was attempted in all patients. Laparoscopy afforded the correct diagnosis in all cases. Laparoscopic peritoneal washout (irrigation and suction of the entire abdominal cavity) with simple suture of the perforation proved successful in 34 patients. An additional omental patching was performed in 15 of these cases. Conversion to conventional open surgery was necessary in 5 patients. The morbidity and mortality rates were 13% and 10%, respectively. The mean operative time was 77 minutes (range: 40-120) and the mean hospital stay 9 days (range: 3-22). Laparoscopic repair of perforated ulcers is technically feasible but requires sound experience in laparoscopic abdominal emergencies. This study shows that the mini-invasive procedure is safe and effective, offering a valid alternative to traditional laparotomy.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers. The role of laparoscopy in generalised peritonitis.

This non-randomised concurrent cohort study conducted in two teaching hospital Departments of Surgery examined the assumption that the benefits of elective laparoscopic upper gastrointestinal surgery would apply to those with generalised peritonitis due to perforated peptic ulcers. It compared 20 consecutive laparoscopic repairs of perforated peptic ulcers with a concurrent group of 16 consecutive open repairs. There were no differences pre-operatively between the two groups. The mean duration of surgery was similar (P = 0.46). There were no differences in the rate of GI tract recovery, but opiate analgesia requirement in the laparoscopic group was significantly less (P < 0.0001). Intensive care was required in three patients in the laparoscopic group (two with renal failure) and two in the open (no renal failure). Two patients in the laparoscopic and one in the open group died. The median duration of stay was five days in the laparoscopic group and six in the open. This comparison shows that the patho-physiological insult of laparoscopy in the setting of generalised peritonitis does not obviously increase the peri-operative risk of organ failure but objective benefits are small.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

[Anti H2 receptors and perforated peptic ulcer. Review of 442 cases].

H2 blockers have accelerated the reduction in elective peptic ulcer surgery but appear to have had no equivalent effect on the incidence of perforated ulcer success. A 13 year (1975-1987) review of perforated peptic ulcer is presented. The mean annual number of operations for perforation fell from 8.21% to 4.93% after 1980, while the number of operations for perforated gastric ulcer in this period was almost unchanged. A significant reduction was found in mean annual rates for perforated duodenal ulcer from 6.86% to 3.82% after 1980, while the number of operations for perforated gastric ulcer in this period was almost unchanged.

Cohort Studies↗