Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Manometry”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources

Biliary manometry in choledochal cyst with abnormal choledochopancreatico ductal junction.

Intraoperative manometry of the biliary tract and measurement of amylase levels in choledochal cysts were performed in seven patients, aged 14 months to 5 years, with choledochal cysts, in an investigation of the pathophysiology of the biliary tract. An abnormal choledochopancreatico ductal junction was observed in these seven patients by preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) or intraoperative cholangiograms. All six patients examined showed a high amylase level in the choledochal cyst (5,450 to 46,500 Somogyi Units). The intraoperative manometry of the biliary tract showed that a remarkable high pressure zone as was found in the area of sphincter of Oddi was not found in the area of abnormal choledochopancreatico ductal junction. The pressure recordings also demonstrated that the sphincter of Oddi pressure in the patient with choledochal cyst was increased by gastrin stimulation. On the contrary, no pressure reaction to gastrin or secretin was found in the area of abnormal choledochopancreatic ductal junction. From these results it seems that free reflux of pancreatic juice into the biliary system occurs, and the reflux stream depends upon the pressure gradient between pancreatic ductal pressure and common bile duct pressure because of the lack of a sphincter function at the choledochopancreatico ductal junction.

Amylases↗

Gastrointestinal transit time, frequency of defecation, and anorectal manometry in healthy and constipated children.

Total gastrointestinal transit time (TGITT), frequency of defecation, and anorectal manometry were evaluated in 63 pediatric patients referred for chronic nonorganic constipation; in 39, segmental transit times of the right and left colon and rectum were also measured. TGITT was significantly longer in chronically constipated children than in matched normal controls. Although bowel frequency was highly significantly correlated with TGITT in patients with prolonged transit time, not all children with prolonged TGITT had reduced bowel frequency. Moreover, not all children with constipation had prolonged TGITT. In children with idiopathic chronic constipation, slowing of intestinal transit occurred most frequently at the level of the distal colon and rectum. Anorectal motility variables were not significantly different in children with functional chronic constipation and in normal children. Maximal resting and pressure and mean intrarectal distending volume causing threshold inhibition in constipated patients did not significantly differ from the control values. Therefore, anorectal manometry did not detect relevant motor abnormalities in constipated children.

Anal Canal↗

Standards for oesophageal manometry. A position statement from the Gruppo Italiano di Studio Motilità Apparato Digerente (GISMAD).

Manometry is an important tool in the diagnosis of oesophageal motility, disorders, but proper instruments and methods are needed to obtain useful clinical information. The authors reviewed the minimal technical requirements, operative aspects, which information the final report should contain as well as indications and contraindications of the text itself. Technical requirements: At least a three-channel, multiple-lumen catheter perfused with a pneumo-hydraulic capillary infusion system which ensures deltaP/deltaT>150-200 mmHg/sec.; data should be recorded at a sampling rate of > or =8 Hz to study the oesophageal body and lower oesophageal sphincter; lower oesophageal sphincter tonic (pressure) and phasic activity (relaxations) and oesophageal body amplitude and peristaltic activity should be recorded. The final report must contain the patient's details, the indication for the test and a manometric diagnosis. Indications for manometry: Dysphagia (after ruling out any organic pathology); non- cardiac chest pain (after ruling out any cardiopulmonary involvement); systemic collagenosis (to investigate oesophageal involvement); gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (if surgery is planned). Contraindications are limited to: pharyngeal or upper oesophageal obstructions, oesophageal bullous disorder, cardiac conditions in which vagal stimulation may not be tolerated, severe coagulopathy and patient non-compliance.

Equipment Design↗

Use of simultaneous high-resolution endoluminal sonography (HRES) and manometry to characterize high pressure zone of distal esophagus.

The purpose of this investigation was to separate the high pressure zone (HPZ) of the distal esophagus into its two components, the intrinsic lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and the extrinsic crural diaphragm (CD), using simultaneous esophageal manometry and high-resolution endoluminal sonography. Five normal subjects were studied during end inspiration using a dual manometry/ultrasound catheter. The HPZ in the distal esophagus was characterized ultrasonographically as the CD distally and as an overlap of CD and LES proximally. In four of five volunteers, the initial distal rise in pressure at the HPZ corresponded to imaging of CD rather than imaging of the LES. In all subjects, peak pressure corresponded to an overlap of CD and LES. In conclusion, it is possible to divide the HPZ into its two components, the LES and CD using simultaneous high-resolution endoluminal sonography and esophageal manometry. During end inspiration, the CD contributes to the initial distal rise in pressure at the HPZ. Peak pressure of the HPZ corresponds to an overlap of the LES with the CD.

Adult↗

Acid rereflux: a review, emphasizing detection by impedance, manometry, and scintigraphy, and the impact on acid clearing pathophysiology as well as interpreting the pH record.

Acid clearing, the interval while intraesophageal pH is < 4 after a traditional acid reflux event (RE), is a potential "blind spot" during pH monitoring, when reflux of acidified gastric contents may occur undetected by the pH probe. This is termed "acid rereflux." Acid rereflux comprised 61% (169/262) of acid REs in recumbent postprandial patients with severe GERD in two reports using simultaneous pH monitoring and manometry as well as multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) in one, and scintigraphy in the other. Acid rereflux events often recurred with short intervals between them. The pH probe alone was insufficient to detect most acid rereflux REs, since expanding pH criteria for an acid RE (> 1 unit fall while pH < 4) detected only 35% of acid rereflux REs. When a variety of patients and study conditions was examined, simultaneous manometry-pH monitoring found more frequent acid rereflux in the following situations: (1) patients with vs those without esophagitis; (2) recumbent vs upright posture, and (3) postprandial vs preprandial. Of pathophysiologic importance, acid rereflux in the blind spot is the most common cause of prolonged daytime acid REs in GERD patients. Of clinical importance, the 24-hr pH parameter "% acid exposure" should be relied upon most in interpreting the 24-hr pH record, because those parameters that relate to RE frequency may be inaccurate due to acid rereflux REs that are not counted. Furthermore, identifying as many REs as possible gives a more reliable indication of the severity of antireflux barrier incompetence, as well as more REs to correlate with patients symptoms that should improve sensitivity of the symptom index. Ambulatory simultaneous pH monitoring and MII will allow these and other roles for acid rereflux to be assessed during the patients normal day.

Esophagogastric Junction↗

Achalasia: the usefulness of manometry for evaluation of treatment.

Although manometry is used with increasing frequency to evaluate the effectiveness of different treatments for achalasia, the criteria for a successful manometric response have not been well defined. Manometric responses were collected before and after 43 treatments in 35 patients with achalasia in order to determine manometric changes after different clinical outcomes: 15 unsuccessful outcomes and 28 successful outcomes were reported. In the latter, resting pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter decreased to 12.8 mm Hg, whereas in unsuccessful outcomes this was significantly higher (28.2 mm Hg). A decrease of lower esophageal sphincter pressure below 17 mm Hg or more than 40% of the pretreatment level was associated with successful outcomes. Our data suggest that manometry is a good indicator of therapeutic effectiveness and we propose that it be used systematically for objective evaluation of achalasia treatment.

Catheterization↗

Esophageal swallowing phase assessed by audiosignal recording: relationship with manometry in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients.

The acoustic technique has been used for pharyngeal exploration but to date no such technique has been devised to assess esophageal motility. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that displacement through the esophagus can be quantified using this method in healthy subjects and in patients with gastroesophageal reflux. Concurrent manometric and acoustic recordings were also performed in the patients. Fifteen controls (38.5 +/- 13 years old) and 10 patients (34.9 +/- 6 years old) were included. All were recorded during wet and dry swallow sequences with microphones placed below the cricoid cartilage and on the xiphoid appendix. Standard manometry was performed for lower esophageal sphincter (LES) exploration. For the acoustic technique, the frequency of xiphoid signals (FX), esophageal transit time (ETT), duration of xiphoid sound (SD), and for the manometric study, the duration of LES relaxation (RD) were recorded and mean values were calculated (FXm), (ETTm), (SDm), (RDm). FXm for wet (94 vs 81.6%) and dry swallows (86 vs 66.6%) decreased in patients. ETTm was significantly higher (P < 0.01) for wet than for dry swallows (5.6 +/- 0.9 vs 5.2 +/- 1.2 sec) for controls but not for patients. ETTm was significantly higher for patients for wet (7.2 +/- 2.1 sec) and for dry swallows (6.5 +/- 2.3 sec) than for controls and SDm was lower. Xiphoid sound appeared in the second half of LES relaxation. Our noninvasive acoustic technique is simple and reproducible. It is well correlated with manometry, and it allows characterization of the displacement of the bolus through the esophagus and the LES. The technique could be used alone to determine appropriate pharmacological and surgical treatments for esophageal motility disorders.

Acoustics↗

Double-peaked high-pressure zone at the esophagogastric junction in controls and in patients with a hiatal hernia: a study using high-resolution manometry.

The lower esophageal high-pressure zone (HPZ) consists of the intrinsic lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and the diaphragmatic sphincter. In patients with a hiatal hernia these constituents are separated. We performed high-resolution manometry of the esophagogastric HPZ in six controls, six patients with a small hernia, and six patients with a large hernia. Prevalence of a double-peak pressure profile of the HPZ was noted. Pressures and distances between the peaks were assessed. Prevalence of the double-peak profile was similar between patients with a small hernia and controls, but patients with a large hernia showed a higher prevalence with inspiration (P < 0.05) than the others. The distance between the two peaks was larger in patients with a large hernia (P < 0.05). In conclusion, high-resolution manometry makes it possible to distinguish the diaphragmatic pressure component from the LES. Two pressure peaks can be found both in hernia patients and in healthy volunteers.

Adult↗

Do occult anal sphincter injuries, vector volume manometry and delivery variables have any predictive value for bowel symptoms after first time vaginal delivery without third and fourth degree rupture? A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether there exists a correlation between anal incontinence, occult sphincter injuries, anal manometry values, and delivery variables in primiparous women after first time vaginal delivery. METHODS: Eighty-six primigravida women were recruited for this study. Transanal ultrasonography (TAUS) and vector volume manometry (VVM) was performed and bowel symptoms were recorded at 25 weeks of pregnancy and 5 months after labor. Incontinent women at 5 months after vaginal delivery were interviewed again at 12 months. RESULTS: Nineteen women (25%) experienced flatus incontinence postpartum. After 12 months, only one-third of the women were still incontinent. Fourteen women (19%) showed abnormal TAUS of the anal sphincter. Of the delivery variables, only baby head circumference was significantly associated with flatus incontinence (p = 0.01). There was no correlation between flatus incontinence or delivery variables and anal sphincter injuries; VVM values were not associated with either anal sphincter injuries or flatus incontinence at 5 months, but VVM values were negatively associated with flatus incontinence at 12 months after labor. CONCLUSIONS: At 5 months after labor, flatus incontinence is relatively common, and is not associated with reduced VVM values. Two-thirds of women recover from flatus incontinence during the first year. Women who had flatus incontinence persisting for a minimum of 1 year had reduced VVM values. Anal sphincter injuries as seen by TAUS are not associated with either VVM values or any delivery variable. Baby head circumference is the only delivery variable significantly associated with flatus incontinence.

Adult↗

Oxygen desaturation during oesophageal manometry.

Eighteen generally fit clinical patients were monitored with pulse oximetry. Mean oxygen saturation levels were lower (P<0.05) during oesophageal manometry (97.7-97.3%) than before it (98.3%). Fourteen out of seventeen (successful) traces had short 4-8% desaturation episodes, and in worst cases there were 8-9 episodes. It seems, therefore, that even patients with no predisposing factors than perhaps smoking and mild bronchial asthma are vulnerable to some oxygen desaturation in oesophageal manometry.

Adult↗

Evaluation of unexplained acute and acute recurrent pancreatitis using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, sphincter of Oddi manometry and endoscopic ultrasound.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Unexplained pancreatitis represents a diagnostic challenge. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic utility of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM), bile analysis, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in evaluating such patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 162 patients referred for evaluation of pancreatitis, 72 with a known cause were excluded. The remainder ( n=90) was classified as having prior acute ( n=24) or recurrent acute pancreatitis ( n=66). Bile sampling and SOM were performed at the time of ERCP. EUS was used to assess for tumors and for chronic pancreatitis. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by questionnaire. RESULTS: ERCP was successful in 88/89 patients (99 %). Manometry was successful in 63/67 patients (94 %), and 56 patients underwent EUS. Findings were categorized into five distinct etiologies: sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) ( n=28; 31 %), pancreas divisum ( n=18; 20 %), biliary ( n=18; 20 %), idiopathic ( n=18; 20 %) and tumor-related ( n=8; 9 %). Features of moderate or severe chronic pancreatitis by EUS and ERCP criteria were found in 18 patients (21 %); an additional nine patients had chronic pancreatitis by EUS criteria alone. EUS identified all the tumors. The condition was improved in 96 % of all patients undergoing endoscopic therapy. CONCLUSION: An etiology was identified in the majority of patients with unexplained pancreatitis. SOD represented the most common finding. Moderate to severe chronic pancreatitis was found in over one-fifth of these patients. Bile analysis, SOM, and EUS are useful tools in the evaluation of unexplained acute pancreatitis.

Acute Disease↗

[Normal values for 24-hour manometry of the esophagus].

OBJECTIVE: To obtain normal values of 24-hour manometry of the oesophagus. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Oesophageal pressures were measured in 41 healthy volunteers who had given informed consent. Recordings were made for 24 hours via a two-channel catheter in 27 and via a 4-channel one in 14 subjects. The catheter orifices were 5 and 15 cm respectively 5, 10, 15 and 20 cm above the lower oesophageal sphincter. RESULTS: Median of contractions was 1523 at 5 cm and 1500 at 15 cm (1635 at 10 cm and 2135 at 20 cm) contraction amplitudes were 31 mm Hg at 5 cm, 26 mm Hg at 15 cm; 26 mm Hg at 10 cm and 37 mm Hg at 20 cm. On average 44% of the contractions were propulsive, 17% simultaneous and 30% nonpropulsive, the remainder not clearly defined. Neither age nor sex had a significant influence on the results. Motor activity was reduced during sleep. During eating the number of contractions, their amplitude and propulsive force increased. CONCLUSION: The listed measurements, by defining normal values, make it possible to diagnose hypo- and hypermotility of the oesophagus during long-time manometry. Two-point measurement is sufficient for assessing the smooth-muscle component.

Adult↗

Sphincter of oddi manometry: is it necessary to measure both biliary and pancreatic sphincter pressures?

BACKGROUND: Data are scant on the miss rate of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction if basal pressure in both biliary and pancreatic sphincter segments is not measured during manometry. METHODS: Motility tracings with basal pressure measurements of both sphincter segments were retrospectively analyzed. Basal sphincter pressure greater than 40 mm Hg was considered abnormal in either sphincter segment. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 73 subjects (64 women, 9 men; age 45.3 +/- 1.6 yr). The basal pressures in the 2 sphincter segments were highly discordant (correlation coefficient = 0.2, p = 0.04). Basal pressures were normal in both segments in 19%, abnormal in both segments in 40%, and abnormal in 1 segment but normal in the other in 41%. The negative predictive value of normal biliary sphincter pressure in excluding sphincter dysfunction was 0. 42; when the pancreatic sphincter pressure was normal, the negative predictive value was 0.58. The incidence of pancreatitis with dual duct manometry was comparable to the institutional experience with all sphincter studies. CONCLUSIONS: Although the clinical relevance of individually elevated sphincter pressures remains uncertain, there is significant discordance of basal pressures between the biliary and pancreatic sphincter segments. If only the biliary sphincter pressure were to be measured, one fourth of abnormal sphincter pressures would be missed. Therefore, if the first sphincter segment has a normal basal pressure, the other segment should also be evaluated.

Adult↗

Late complications after antireflux procedures using intraoperative continuous computer-video manometry monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is a common non-malignant gastrointestinal disease. The introduction of minimally invasive surgical techniques and the high costs of pharmacotherapy increased the number of patients subjected to surgical antireflux treatment. Furthermore, the use of advanced technique of manometry--including intraoperative video-assisted continuous pressure monitoring--made possible complicated but objective analysis of the pressure profile in the newly created area of gastroesophageal junction. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The current study was conducted in 159 patients. A group consisted of 93 men and 66 women, mean age of 38 years (range 18-72), subjected to antireflux surgery with continuous intraoperative video-assisted manometry of pressure in the newly created gastroesophageal junction (fundoplication wrap). Surgical procedure was individually tailored in each case depending on the motility parameters and GERD etiology. Eighty seven patients (55%) underwent 360 degrees Nissen fundoplication, 17 "floppy" Nissen procedure (11%), 22 Dor hemifundoplication (14%), and 33 Toupet hemifundoplication (21%). RESULTS: Out of the 159 patients subjected to antireflux procedures only 8 (5.0%) developed dysphagia, and 12 (7.5%) recurrent reflux disease. Recurrent reflux symptoms were most frequently caused by the dislocation of the fundoplication wrap. Dysphagia occurred in patients with too tight fundoplication wrap or because of its dislocation with subsequent rotation and angulation that impaired food passage. In some patients objective causes of dysphagia have not been found. In these patients no abnormalities were detected by the postoperative visualising examinations, and mean pressure in the fundoplication wrap did not exceed critical values. In these cases, dysphagia was caused probably by impaired gastric motility. CONCLUSIONS: 1. GERD with multifactor etiology requires individually tailored surgery based on the results of motility studies. 2. Final result depends on appropriate calculations of the intraoperative pressure in the newly created fundoplication wrap. 3. Appropriate fixing of the fundoplication wrap to the diaphragm is very important in order to decrease the rate of GERD recurrences due to wrap dislocation.

Adolescent↗

Antroduodenal manometry findings in patients with slow-transit constipation.

BACKGROUND: The results of subtotal colectomy for slow-transit constipation are unpredictable. Abdominal pain, distension, and bloating often persist after operation. To ascertain whether patients with slow-transit constipation may have a generalized intestinal motor disorder, we studied the antroduodenal motor activity in 20 consecutive patients with slow-transit constipation. METHODS: All patients underwent symptom registration, whole-gut transit time, anorectal manometry, electromyography of the anal sphincter, the balloon expulsion test, and defecography to characterize their constipation. The motor activity of the the gastric antrum and the proximal small bowel was monitored for 5 h, using a pneumohydraulic water-perfused manometry system with six channels. RESULTS: Twelve patients (60%) had abnormal patterns of motor activity: abnormal propagation or configuration of phase III in 9 of 12 patients, bursts of non-propagated phasic activity in 8 of 12 patients, and sustained periods of intense phasic activity in 3 of 12 patients. One patient had generalized hypomotility with low-amplitude contractions. In addition, an abundance of so-called discrete clustered contractions was found in 6 of 20 patients. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of patients with slow-transit constipation have manometric findings that indicate a generalized motor disorder of the gut. The clinical significance of this finding is still unclear.

Adolescent↗

The fibre Fabry Perot sensor. A long-term manometry sensor for quantitative intraluminal pressure measurement of the gastrointestinal tract.

Sensor dislocation of water perfused side-hole manometry catheters during longer periods of examination, as well as heavy expenditure on equipment and personal, are disadvantages of perfusion manometry. Such catheters have contributed substantially to the attempt to become independent of water as a transmitter medium in manometric pressure sensors for the upper gastrointestinal tract. Using the principle of the mirror interferometer of Fabry and Perot, we have developed and manufactured a fibre-optic Fabry Perot Sensor (FFP) which records local asymmetric pressure with constant sensitivity over the sensor surface area of 40 mm length. The FFP signal was compared with the pressure measured with a conventional four-side-hole perfusion catheter. The signal corresponding to long-term basal pressure of the lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) varied over a normal range, and the signal presenting the pressure in the tubular oesophagus had a normal range determined from 15 healthy volunteers. Due to the phase modulation of its laser, the FFP is nearly independent of substantial artefacts.

Digestive System Physiological Phenomena↗

Anorectal manometry and defecography in the diagnosis of fecal incontinence.

We carried out anorectal manometry and defecography prospectively in 43 consecutive patients with fecal incontinence. A subgroup of 17 patients with severe incontinence was identified radiologically by a short and incompletely closed anal canal. In these patients, the anal resting pressure was significantly lower than in the rest of the group (34.9 +/- 11.4 mm Hg versus 60.0 +/- 25.7 mm Hg, respectively; p less than 0.01). The anorectal angle did not change in 24 patients during squeezing, indicating a dysfunction of the puborectalis muscle. Manometric data did not differ between this subgroup and patients with a more acute anorectal angle during voluntary sphincter contraction. This indicates that the anal pressures recorded manometrically do not reflect the function of a muscular component that is important in the maintenance of fecal continence. We conclude that anorectal manometry and defecography are complementary diagnostic tools in the investigation of patients with fecal incontinence.

Adult↗

Accuracy of anorectal manometry in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease.

The value of anorectal manometry as a diagnostic tool for Hirschsprung's disease (HD) was assessed in 50 children presenting with chronic constipation. Anorectal manometric studies and rectal biopsy were performed on all children. Biopsy specimens were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and serial sections were examined for ganglion cells. Forty-five children had concordant manometric and histologic results, 15 of whom were positive for HD and 30 negative. In five children, the results were discordant. Using histologic aganglionosis as the reference point for the final diagnosis of HD, the overall accuracy of anorectal manometry as a discriminative test was 90.0%. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of manometric studies for the diagnosis of HD were 0.79, 0.97, 0.94, and 0.88, respectively. Factors responsible for the inaccuracies of manometric studies are discussed.

Anal Canal↗