Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Luteinization”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources

Dependence on protein synthesis of the N6-monobutyryl cyclic AMP plus theophylline mediated release of luteinizing hormone induced by luteinizing hormone releasing hormone from rat pituitary glands in vitro.

The involvement of cyclic AMP in the action of LH releasing hormone (LH-RH) on LH secretion was studied by incubating pituitary glands from adult female rats on day 2 of dioestrus with 1 mN-N6-monobutyryl cyclic AMP (mbcAMP) and 10 mM-theophylline for periods of up to 10 h. This treatment induced a pattern of LH release similar to that observed in the presence of a low concentration of LH-RH (0.1 ng LH-RH/ml), i.e. an initial 4 h period during which the release of LH was minimal was followed subsequently by an increased rate of release. In this system inhibition of protein synthesis by cycloheximide (25 microgram/ml) did not impair the initial response of the pituitary tissue but the increase in the rate of LH release during the second phase of the response was blocked. Preincubation with mbcAMP and theophylline increased the responsiveness of the pituitary tissue to LH-RH. This action could be prevented by including cycloheximide during the preincubation period, whereas addition of this drug during the incubation with LH-RH no longer impaired the increased responsiveness. The size of the sensitizing action of mbcAMP and theophylline mediated through the induction of protein synthesis was comparable with that of a high concentration of LH-RH. From the absence of a significant change in total LH during the preincubation period, it was concluded that the increased responsiveness was not the result of newly synthesized LH. The present results suggest a role or roles for cyclic AMP in the secretion of LH induced by LH-RH. Besides an effect on the formation of a factor related to the synthesis of protein, other than LH which has a permissive role in the acute release of LH, cyclic AMP might also be concerned in the secretion process through a pathway which does not involve synthesis of protein.

Animals↗

Effects of oestradiol, hypothalamic extracts and luteinizing hormone releasing hormone on rat anterior pituitary gland gonadotrophin release in vitro before and after the preovulatory luteinizing hormone surge at pro-oestrus.

Changes at the anterior pituitary and/or hypothalamic levels which result in selective FSH release during late pro-oestrus in the cyclic rat were investigated. The possible involvement of decreasing serum concentrations of oestrogen during pro-oestrus in such changes was studied. Rats were decapitated at 12.00 h on pro-oestrus, before the onset of the LH surge and first phase of FSH release, or at 24.00 h on pro-oestrus, shortly after the onset of the second or selective phase of FSH release. Other rats were given oestrogen (OE2) at 14.00 h and killed at 24.00 h pro-oestrus. Paired hemi-anterior pituitary glands were incubated with vehicle or OE2 with or without synthetic LH-releasing hormone (LH-RH) or hypothalamic acid extracts prepared from rats killed at 12.00 or 24.00 h on pro-oestrus. At 24.00 h pro-oestrus, serum FSH concentration was high while serum LH concentration was low regardless of whether rats were given OE2. Glands collected and incubated at 24.00 h released more FSH and less LH than did glands collected and incubated at 12.00 h pro-oestrus. Administration of OE2 in vivo and/or in vitro did not affect these responses. The increments in LH and FSH release attributed to LH-RH or hypothalamic extracts in the glands incubated at 24.00 h were not different from those of the glands incubated at 12.00 h. Also, the hypothalamic extracts prepared from rats killed at 24.00 h were no more effective than the extracts prepared from rats killed at 12.00 h in releasing LH or FSH from glands incubated at 12.00 or 24.00 h pro-oestrus. Administration of OE2 in vivo caused a small suppression of LH-RH-induced FSH release. We suggest that a change occurs at the level of the anterior pituitary gland during the period of the LH surge and first phase of FSH release to increase basal FSH secretion selectively and cause, at least in part, the second phase of increased serum FSH. This change is not mediated by a decrease in serum oestrogen concentration. We failed to observe any evidence that LH-RH causes preferential FSH release during late pro-oestrus or that a hypothalamic peptide with a preferential FSh releasing ability is involved in FSH release at this time.

Animals↗

Response of luteinizing hormone from columns of dispersed rat pituitary cells to a highly potent analogue of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone.

The response of LH from a perfused column of dispersed rat anterior pituitary cells to LH releasing hormone (LH-RH) and the analogue, D-Ser(But)6-desGly10-Proethylamide9-LH-RH (Hoe 766), was investigated. Dose-response curves showed non-parallelism between LH-RH and the analogue. but it was evident that the analogue was considerably more potent. After a single pulse of LH-RH, LH output returned to basal values in 8 min; this was prolonged to 20 min in the case of the analogue. During this 20 min the cells were refractory to pulses of LH-RH but pulses of the analogue maintained output of LH. During constant-dose perfusion with either synthetic LH-RH or the analogue, output of LH rapidly reached a peak and then gradually fell over several hours to approach baseline values. However, a pulse of 50 mmol potassium chloride/l was still able to release LH at this time. The data are consistent with the view that this analogue of LH-RH is highly potent and is strongly bound by the LH-RH receptor. Furthermore, since it desensitizes the LH-RH receptor, it appears that continued turnover of either LH-RH or the analogue at the receptor is necessary for output of LH to be maintained.

Animals↗

Effect of cortisol or adrenocorticotrophin on release of luteinizing hormone induced by luteinizing hormone releasing hormone in the dairy heifer.

During treatment with cortisol or ACTH, dairy heifers were given two doses of LH releasing hormone (LH-RH) spaced 1.5 h apart. Serum concentrations of cortisol and LH were monitored during each treatment. Treatment with both ACTH and cortisol raised plasma cortisol levels above the respective saline controls (P less than 0.001). Neither treatment affected basal LH concentrations. A slight depression in LH response was seen in the cortisol-treated animals after the first LH-RH injection, as shown by a statistically significant depression at three of the sample times. There was no significant difference between treated and control LH values after the second LH-RH administration. Treatment with ACTH resulted in significantly reduced LH values at all sample times after both injections of LH-RH.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗

Luteinizing hormone responses to repeated injections of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone in the rat during the oestrous cycle and after ovariectomy with or without oestrogen treatment.

In order to characterize the nature of the LH response to exogenous LH releasing hormone (LH-RH) in female rats during the oestrous cycle and after ovariectomy with or without oestrogen treatment, serum LH levels were determined after repeated LH-RH injections (300 ng/kg body wt, six times with 30-min intervals). The LH response to the first LH-RH stimulation was greatest on the days of pro-oestrus and oestrus followed by dioestrus 2 and dioestrus 1. Second and subsequent LH-RH challenges enhanced the LH response only on pro-oestrus and dioestrus 2. Larger doses of LH-RH (3 microgram/kg body wt) induced a small self-priming effect on dioestrus 1 and oestrus. The LH response to the first LH-RH administration increased with time up to 30 days after ovariectomy and then reached a plateau. A small self-priming effect was present in rats ovariectomized for 30 and 60 days, but absent in rats ovariectomized for 5, 10 and 120 days. Oestrogen treatment increased the self-priming effect in rats ovariectomized for 5 days, with little sensitization of the pituitary gland to the first LH-RH injection on the next day. In rats ovariectomized for 120 days, oestrogen treatment enhanced responsiveness to the first and successive LH-RH stimulations on the next day, and further enhancement to the first response only was induced 3 days after oestrogen treatment.

Animals↗

Effects of chronic treatment with oestrogen, an oestrogen antagonist and a potent luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist analogue on pituitary responsiveness to luteinizing hormone releasing hormone in the rat.

The rise in gonadotrophin release which occurs after ovariectomy is caused by steroid withdrawal resulting in an enhanced pituitary responsiveness to LH releasing hormone (LHRH) associated with increased LHRH release and pituitary LHRH binding. The effects of oestrogen replacement after ovariectomy and chronic treatment of intact rats with an oestrogen antagonist, tamoxifen, on LH release and in-vitro pituitary responses to LHRH have been investigated. Capsules containing crystalline oestradiol, implanted at the time of ovariectomy, completely inhibited the rise in LH release although pituitary responsiveness was greater after 10 days in the oestrogen-treated rats than in untreated ovariectomized controls. On day 4 after ovariectomy pituitary responses to LHRH were comparable in both treated and untreated groups although in both groups the responses were greater than those measured in intact dioestrous rats. Treatment with tamoxifen over a 4-day period also augmented pituitary responsiveness but only at the lowest dose (0.5 mg/kg); no effect on serum LH concentrations was observed. Higher doses of the antagonist (1 and 2 mg/kg) did not affect pituitary responses, although the highest dose did cause a significant rise in serum LH. Treatment with a daily dose of 50 ng [D-Ser(But)6]LHRH(1-9)nonapeptide-ethylamide, starting on the day of ovariectomy, markedly attenuated the LH responses to LHRH ex vivo at days 2, 4 and 10 after ovariectomy. In contrast, the analogue treatment did not abolish the rise in LH release but this was proportionately less than in controls.

Animals↗

Prostaglandin D2 induces release of luteinizing hormone from the rat pituitary gland without the modulation of hypothalamic luteinizing hormone releasing hormone.

The effect of prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) on release of LH and LH releasing hormone (LHRH) was studied in a sequential double-chamber superfusion system using the medial basal hypothalamus (MBH) and the pituitary gland from female rats at dioestrus. Infusion of PGD2 (5.7 or 57 mumol/l) caused a significant (P less than 0.05) increase in LH release to values 40-60% above the preinjection values from the pituitary gland superfused either alone or in series with the MBH. No release of LHRH in response to PGD2 was observed from the superfused MBH. These data demonstrate that PGD2 causes LH release from the pituitary gland not by inducing release of hypothalamic LHRH but by a direct action on the gland.

Animals↗

Variations in hypothalamic luteinizing hormone releasing hormone content and release in vitro and plasma concentrations of luteinizing hormone and testosterone in developing cockerels.

An in-vitro superfusion system was used to study age-dependent changes in the functional activity of LH releasing hormone (LHRH) neurones terminating in the mediobasal hypothalamus (MBH) of the cockerel. Fragments of MBH tissue were obtained from cockerels killed at 8, 12, 16 and 20 weeks of age and both the rate of release of LHRH in vitro and the residual content of LHRH were determined by radioimmunoassay. Blood was collected from a similar group of cockerels of the same age for determination of plasma LH and testosterone concentrations. Superfused cockerel MBH showed both basal and depolarization-induced release of LHRH and the calcium-dependency of the release process was demonstrated. The viability of MBH in vitro was indicated by the observation that the rate of CO2 production by the tissue remained constant during a 3-h period of superfusion. Both the basal rate of release of LHRH (7.24 +/- 0.63 pg/2MBH per h; mean +/- S.E.M., n = 4) and the residual content of LHRH (1.10 +/- 0.24 ng/2MBH) were lowest in the 8-week-old cockerel and increased progressively to reach levels three (P less than 0.001) and 13 (P less than 0.001) times greater, respectively, by 20 weeks of age. Concentrations of LH and testosterone in plasma did not increase significantly until 16 weeks of age when the respective values were 5.86 +/- 0.37 micrograms/l and 1.88 +/- 0.31 nmol/l (n = 11). Whereas plasma testosterone increased further to 5.76 +/- 0.42 nmol/l (n equal 11) at 20 weeks of age, plasma LH fell significantly (P less than 0.02) to a concentration of 4.08 +/- 0.41 micrograms/l (n = 11).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗

Influence of stage of lactation, exogenous luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone, and suckling on estrus, positive feedback of luteinizing hormone, and ovulation in sows treated with estrogen.

The overall objective of this study was to investigate the LH response and occurrence of estrus and ovulation in sows treated with estradiol benzoate (EB) at mid- (d 14) or late (d 28) lactation. Experiment 1 tested the hypothesis that hourly pulses of LHRH given to sows treated with EB would cause a greater proportion to exhibit LH surges. Sows (n = 32) at mid- or late lactation were given (i.m.) corn oil (CO) or EB (10 micrograms/kg BW) at 0 h and no pulses or hourly pulses (100 ng/pulse) of the LHRH agonist des-Gly10,[D-ALA6]-LHRH ethylamide (LHRH-A) from 54 to 96 h, the anticipated period of positive feedback of LH. Blood samples for determination of estradiol-17 beta (E2) and LH were collected every 6 h from -12 to 120 h from sows treated with EB. Estrus was checked daily with a mature boar, and ovulation was assessed by measuring progesterone in blood 1 wk after estrus induced by EB or 2 wk after weaning at 34 +/- 1.4 d postpartum. Lactational estrus occurred in 0 of 16 and 15 of 16 sows given CO and EB, respectively; however, no sow ovulated in response to EB. Concentrations of LH were lower (P < .01) during mid- than during late lactation, and LHRH-A pulses had no effect on secretion of LH and E2. The LH concentrations during the pretreatment (-12 to 0 h), negative feedback (6 to 54 h), and positive feedback (60 to 96 h) periods at mid-lactation (.32 +/- .03, .22 +/- .01, and .54 +/- .08 ng/mL, respectively) differed (P < .01) from values at late lactation (.80 +/- .06, .49 +/- .02, and 1.47 +/- .17, respectively). Preovulatory-like surges of LH occurred in one of eight (peak 2.1 ng/mL) and seven of eight (peak 2.9 +/- 1 ng/mL) sows given EB at mid- and late lactation, respectively. Experiment 2 tested the hypothesis that the hypothalamus and pituitary of sows weaned 96 h before they were given EB would show a greater responsiveness than those weaned and given EB simultaneously. Sows (n = 16) at mid- or late lactation were treated with EB (10 micrograms/kg BW; i.m.), and one-half of the sows were suckled until the moment of EB treatment, whereas the other half had their litters weaned 96 h before treatment with EB.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animals↗

Effects of insulin-like growth factor I and insulin on proliferation and on basal and luteinizing hormone-induced steroidogenesis of bovine thecal cells: involvement of glucose and receptors for insulin-like growth factor I and luteinizing hormone.

The objective of the present study was to determine the effects of IGF-I and insulin on cell proliferation, LH receptors, and basal and LH-induced progesterone and androstenedione production by bovine thecal cells. Cells from large (> or = 8mm) bovine follicles were cultured for 1 or 2 d in medium containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and treated for 1 or 2 d in serum-free medium with IGF-I, insulin, and(or) LH. Treatment with 30 and 100 ng/mL of IGF-I for 1 or 2 d increased thecal cell numbers in the absence of LH regardless of whether treatments were initiated after 1 or 2 d of exposure to 10% FCS. Co-treatment with LH reduced the stimulatory effect of IGF-I on thecal cell numbers. Insulin at 10 and 100 ng/mL increased cell numbers in the presence of LH. Both IGF-I and insulin were ineffective at stimulating thecal cell progesterone or androstenedione production in the absence of LH. However, IGF-I and insulin increased (P < .05) androstenedione and progesterone production in the presence of LH. Alone, LH had little or no effect on androstenedione and progesterone production, whereas in the presence of 30 and 100 ng/mL IGF-I or 1 to 100 ng/mL insulin, LH stimulated (P < .05) androstenedione production. The stimulatory effects of IGF-I on cell proliferation and progesterone production were not detected in the presence of 100 ng/mL insulin. However, co-treatment with various doses of IGF-I and 100 ng/mL insulin further increased androstenedione production above that seen with insulin alone. In glucose-deficient medium, 25 to 75 mg/dL of glucose increased (P < .05) thecal cell proliferation, progesterone production, and androstenedione production. In the absence or presence of glucose, insulin (100 ng/mL) increased (P < .05) thecal cell proliferation, progesterone production, and androstenedione production. Treatment with 3, 10, or 100 ng/mL LH had no effect (P > .10) on the numbers of IGF-I binding sites on thecal cells but increased (P < .05) androstenedione production. Treatment with 10 and 100 ng/mL IGF-I increased (P <.01) numbers of LH/hCG binding sites. These results indicate that IGF-I and insulin may each play a significant role in thecal cell mitogenesis and LH-induced thecal cell steroidogenesis during follicular development in cattle and that glucose enhances these effects. Furthermore, the synergism between IGF-I and LH on increasing steroidogenesis does not seem to be mediated through increased binding sites for IGF-I in bovine thecal cells but rather, in part, through increased binding sites for LH.

Androstenedione↗

Effect of melatonin on the luteinizing hormone release induced by clomiphene and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone.

The effect of melatonin on the LH-release response after the administration of synthetic LH-RH and clomiphene citrate was investigated in adult male rats. The sc administration of melatonin (1 mg/day) for 6 days produced a significant decrease in serum LH levels and in seminal vesicles and ventral prostate weights. On the other hand, the daily injection of 0.01 mg/100 g of body weight of clomiphene citrate during 6 days significantly stimulated LH levels and the weights of the accessory sex glands. Simultaneous treatment with melatonin and clomiphene produced an inhibitory effect similar to that obtained with melatonin alone. Neither pretreatment with melatonin alone. Neither pretreatment with melatonin (1 mg/day, sc for 6 days) nor its simultaneous iv administration (500 mug) with 75 ng of LH-RH modified the LH-release in response to the hypothalamic hormone. The fact that melatonin was able to suppress the effect of clomiphene, which is probably exerted at the hypothalamic level, but not the actiion of LH-RH on the pituitary, appears to indicate that the hypothalamus may be the site involved in the inhibitory effect of the pineal principle on the reproductive function.

Animals↗