Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Lithotripsy”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Update on shock wave lithotripsy technology.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Since the first patient was successfully treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in 1980, its rapid acceptance and widespread use have championed this form of stone therapy as the treatment of choice for the majority of renal and ureteral calculi. Worldwide clinical series have documented the efficacy and safety of shock wave lithotripsy. RECENT FINDINGS: Shock wave lithotripters have undergone modifications of the source for generation of shock waves, focusing, and even localization techniques since the introduction of the original Dornier HM3 lithotripter. Yet the basic concepts remain the same: to produce an acoustic wave that can be focused at a specific location for stone fragmentation. Safety and efficacy of the different generations of lithotripters is well documented. Indications and utilization of shock wave lithotripsy have expanded, with clinical efficacy approaching or exceeding that of other modalities of minimally invasive surgery. Complications, however, can arise as a result of shock wave therapy. SUMMARY: This review provides an update of the latest shock wave technology, reviewing the clinical indications and efficacy of treatment and discussing the potential adverse events associated with shock wave lithotripsy.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

In vitro comparison of fragmentation efficiency of flexible pneumatic lithotripsy using 2 flexible ureteroscopes.

PURPOSE: Pneumatic lithotripsy has been shown to be an effective and safe intracorporeal lithotripsy modality for renal and ureteral calculi, capable of fragmenting stones of all compositions. We determined the in vitro stone fragmentation abilities of the 0.5 mm flexible pneumatic lithotripsy probe when inserted through the working channel of 2, 7.5Fr flexible ureteroscope designs (straight working channel and offset working channel at approximately 30 degrees from the long axis of the endoscope). The velocity and displacement of the pneumatic probe tip were also evaluated with the probe inserted through each endoscope. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 0.5 mm (1.5Fr) stainless steel probe was tested at 5 deflection angles, namely 0, 12, 24, 33 and 48 degrees, at a pneumatic pressure of 2.5 bar when inserted through the offset and straight working channel ureteroscopes. A noncontact optical laser system was used to measure or calculate the displacement and velocity of the 0.5 mm probe tip at each angle of deflection with the 2 ureteroscopes. Fragmentation at all deflection angles was assessed using plaster of Paris stone phantoms with the pneumatic device on continuous mode at 2.5 bar pressure for 30 seconds. Stones were weighed after each fragmentation cycle and the percent weight lost was determined. Comparisons were made between the 2 ureteroscopes at each angle. RESULTS: Probe tip displacement was significantly better through the straight channel ureteroscope with 30% improvement at all angles tested compared to the offset channel. Moreover, a substantial decrement in tip displacement was noted as the angle of deflection increased regardless of the endoscope used. Conversely tip velocity was relatively unchanged throughout the study and it was equivalent from straight to offset channel measurements. Phantom stone fragmentation correlated inversely with the severity of the deflection angle. An approximately 80% loss of fragmentation ability was noted as the angle increased from 0 to 48 degrees. Although the pneumatic device performed better through the straight channel scope, a similar percent loss in fragmentation from 0 to 48 degrees was seen when using either endoscope. CONCLUSIONS: The flexible pneumatic 0.5 mm lithotripsy probe appears to be best used through a straight channel flexible ureteroscope, out performing use through the offset channel scope at all angles of deflection. Tip displacement and fragmentation ability were inversely related to the degree of active deflection as the angle increased from 0 to 48 degrees. Use of the flexible pneumatic probe to aid in managing renal or proximal ureteral calculi may be limited until an improved probe can be developed, allowing complete and unencumbered fragmentation throughout all angles of deflection.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗
PubMed2005

Shock wave lithotripsy of stones implanted in the proximal ureter of the pig.

PURPOSE: Ureteral stones can be difficult to treat with shock wave (SW) lithotripsy. A strategy for lithotripsy of proximal ureteral stones is to push them back into the renal pelvis prior to administering SWs. However, push-back is invasive and not always possible. Since there are few clues to suggest how best to treat ureteral stones with SWs in situ, we developed an animal model for research on lithotripsy for ureteral stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gypsum model stones were implanted bilaterally in the proximal ureter and renal calix of the pig via percutaneous access. Lithotripsy was performed using a HM3 lithotripter (Dornier Medical Systems, Marietta, Georgia) and stones at each location were treated with the same dose (400 SWs, 20 kV and 30 SWs per minute). Fragments were collected and the percent increase in projected surface area of the particles was determined. RESULTS: The breakage (mean percent area increase) of stones implanted in the proximal ureter was significantly less than that of stones located in the renal calix treated with the same dose of shock waves (134% vs 327%, p <0.001). Also, stones that were fully confined by the ureter did not break as well as stones located at the ureteropelvic junction. This indicates that the physical environment surrounding a stone can have a significant effect on the efficiency of SW action. CONCLUSIONS: The observation that stones implanted in the ureter showed decreased breakage compared with stones in the kidney is consistent with clinical experience. This finding is a valuable and even essential prerequisite for any experimental animal model system intended for the study of SW action in the breakage of ureteral stones.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Lower pole ratio: a new and accurate predictor of lower pole stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy?

BACKGROUND: Lower pole spatial anatomy is an important determinant of success after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. In the present study, we determine whether there is a significant relationship between lower pole ratio (infundibular length : infundibular width) on preoperative intravenous urograms and stone fragment clearances after shockwave lithotripsy. METHODS: A total of 42 patients with isolated lower pole stones were retrospectively reviewed. Anatomical factors, such as infundibular length, width and infundibulopelvic angle were measured and the lower pole ratio was calculated on pretreatment intravenous urogram. Stone fragment clearance was assessed at three months with a plain abdominal X-ray. RESULTS: The overall three-month stone-free rate was 62%. Mean stone size +/- SD was 10 +/- 4.8 mm, mean infundibular length was 21.7 +/- 6.9 mm, mean infundibular width was 6.1 +/- 2.3 mm, mean infundibulopelvic angle was 62.1 +/- 30.1 degrees and mean lower pole ratio was 4.3 +/- 2.8. Stone-free status after shockwave lithotripsy was significantly related to infundibular length and width as well as to lower pole ratio, but not to infundibulo-pelvic angle. Infundibular length less than 30 mm, width greater than 5 mm and lower pole ratio less than 3.5 were noted to have an improved three-month stone-free rate (P = 0.049, 0.01 and <0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Caliceal anatomy is an important consideration for lower pole stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy. The present study suggests that a lower pole ratio of less than 3.5, which considers both infundibular length and width, is a promising predictor for stone-free status.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Is sessional access worthwhile?

One hundred and fifty-three patients with renal stones referred to one teaching hospital have received extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) treatment as a result of a monthly sessional arrangement organised with a neighbouring lithotripter unit. The results of treatment, assessed 3 months after lithotripsy, showed results comparable with those from any lithotripter centre. Sessional access for lithotripsy may provide a satisfactory way of increasing the number of patients who are treated with lithotripsy by reducing the demand for beds at the hospitals where a lithotripter is sited.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1987

Electrohydraulic lithotripsy of gall stones--in vitro and animal studies.

Electrohydraulic lithotripsy of human gall stones was investigated in vitro in a bath of saline and in a saline perfused bile duct. The technique was effective--only two stones could not be shattered. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy power requirement correlated with mechanical strength of stones, but not with biochemical composition. A trend toward higher power requirement was recorded with larger stones and stones over 2 cm in diameter could not be fragmented. Safety studies indicated that electrohydraulic lithotripsy was safe, provided the probe tip was not in contact with the bile duct wall. In vivo studies did not show any late effects after 10 days. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy is likely to be useful in the management of biliary calculi.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Biliary lithotripsy: early observations in 106 patients. Work in progress.

One hundred six patients underwent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for cholelithiasis. Of these, 28 patients underwent cholangiographically guided lithotripsy for bile duct stones to assist nonoperative stone removal by endoscopic or radiologic intervention. Fragmentation occurred in 20 of 28 cases (71%) with an average of two lithotripsy sessions. Hemobilia was observed in four patients (14%) for a 24-hour period. Seventy-eight of the 106 were outpatients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis with one to five calculi who underwent cholecystographic or ultrasound-(US) guided shock wave lithotripsy as definitive therapy. US examination showed stone fragmentation in 86% of cases. With an average of 1.6 treatment sessions and 4,750 shocks, fragments were 4 mm or smaller in 46% of patients. Nine percent of patients had no fragments after an average of 10 weeks, but long-term follow-up is not yet available. Two patients developed acute pancreatitis attributable to fragment passage and one patient acute cholecystitis, likely due to cystic duct obstruction by a fragment.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Outpatient extracorporeal lithotripsy of kidney stones: 1,200 treatments.

1,200 extracorporeal lithotripsies have been performed in 816 patients. 58% of the stones had a diameter of 3-10 mm, 41% measured between 11 and 20 mm and 1% were larger than 20 mm. The patients were all treated on an outpatient basis without either anesthesia or analgesia. The mean time spent at the lithotripsy center was 2 h: the mean treatment time was 46 min, i.e. 3,450 shocks at a frequency of 1.25/s. 530 patients were reviewed after 3 months. Overall, 64% of them were stone free. These results varied between 73% for stones less than 10 mm in diameter and 43% for stones larger than 20 mm in diameter. 69% of the patients presenting with a single stone were stone free at 3 months. The best results were obtained in upper caliceal stones (78%) and the least satisfactory results were obtained in the lower caliceal stones (68%). The complication rate was low: renal colic in 18% of cases, fever in 2% of cases. Altogether, 13 disobstructions were required, namely 12 endoscopic and 1 surgical. 33% of patients were retreated without admission to hospital. Outpatient extracorporeal piezoelectric lithotripsy is indicated for renal pelvic or caliceal stones less than 20 mm in diameter situated in a nonobstructed renal cavity, in a noninfected patient without any particular risk factors. 85% of patients are currently treated at the lithotripsy center on an outpatient basis.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

In vitro lithotripsy with the Alexandrite laser.

The Alexandrite laser system has proven to be an effective and safe method of ureteral lithotripsy. Some authors have recently reported the risk of interspersion of fiber splinters into tissue during lithotripsy, when short pulses and high power densities are employed. In vitro lithotripsy on renal calculi artificially placed in human ureters was realized under the parameters of a manufactured model (Alexantriptor, HMT). We have observed neither interspersion of fragments nor ureteral damage. These in vitro experiments and our clinical experience confirm that Alexandrite laser lithotripsy is reliable and safe.

Humans↗
PubMed1992

Extracorporeal piezoelectric shock-wave lithotripsy of salivary gland stones.

Piezoelectric lithotripsy was undertaken on 19 patients with salivary stones, with none of these patients requiring anesthesia, analgetics, or sedatives. All salivary stones were totally fragmented during first lithotripsy. Four months after treatment with extracorporeal shock waves, all patients were free of symptoms and, in 11 of the patients, no calculi could be found sonographically. The piezoelectric lithotripsy of salivary stones caused no serious side effects which could be proven by clinical, biochemical, sonographic, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations. Extracorporeal piezoelectric lithotripsy is a new and promising nonsurgical therapy for selected cases of sialolithiasis of the parotid and submandibular glands.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Gallstone extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: time and treatment considerations.

We evaluated 30 gallstone lithotripsy procedures performed on 27 patients with the Dornier MPL-9000 Lithotripter to determine how time was spent in the lithotripsy suite and to evaluate the various technical reasons for interrupting the administration of shock waves during the treatment. The procedure averaged 98 +/- 32 min total time in the lithotripsy suite. This included an average of 22 +/- 6 min before the treatment, 70 +/- 28 min for administration of shock waves, and 6 +/- 2 min after the treatment. The time required to deliver the shock waves did not correlate with patient age, sex, or weight; the number of gallstones; or the number or date of the treatment. However, a trend was seen toward an association between shorter treatment times and larger stone volumes. On the average, the administration of shock waves was interrupted every 48 shock waves for various reasons. Electronically changing the imaging plane of the in-line sonographic transducer to retarget the stone in the focal zone was by far the most frequent reason for interrupting shock-wave delivery, averaging 56 shock waves between changes. We conclude that extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of gallstones is a time consuming and technically demanding procedure that requires continuous monitoring and frequent interruption in order to optimize targeting and fragmentation of the stone(s) while maintaining the patient's comfort.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Biliary lithotripsy: correlation between gallbladder contractility before treatment and the success of treatment.

We perform biliary lithotripsy without adjuvant chemolitholytic agents, and therefore fragment clearance depends solely on the gallbladder's ability to evacuate its contents. We studied 205 patients to determine if gallbladder contractility before biliary lithotripsy is a predictor of treatment results and rate of fragment clearance. Percentage gallbladder contraction was calculated from the fractional difference in the sonographically measured gallbladder volumes before and after a fatty meal. Seventy-six patients (37%) were free of stones and fragments, and 129 patients (63%) had residual fragments at comparable follow-up intervals. Statistical analysis showed a significant difference in gallbladder contractility before biliary lithotripsy between the fragment-free group and the residual-fragment group (p = .008). Stone burden before treatment showed no significant difference between the groups (p = .074), but the number of stones was significantly less in the fragment-free group (p = .022). In the fragment-free group, a poor correlation (r = .047) was found between the percentage gallbladder contraction and the rate of fragment clearance. These data indicate that contractility of the gallbladder before treatment correlates with overall success of biliary lithotripsy but is not a predictor of the speed of fragment clearance.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Gallstone lithotripsy: results when number of stones is excluded as a criterion for treatment.

The Siemens Lithostar Plus protocol (Siemens Medical Systems, Iselin, NJ) allows investigators to perform gallstone lithotripsy on patients regardless of the number of stones they have, provided the stones occupy less than 50% of the gallbladder lumen. The purpose of this study was to determine the interrelationships between stone burden, fragmentation response, and stone-free rates when treatment is not limited to three stones or fewer. Of 200 patients initially examined, 80 (40%) underwent lithotripsy. The mean number of treatments per patient was 2.1, and the mean number of shock waves per patient was 7386. In 60 patients in whom 6-month follow-up was available, the overall stone-free rate, based on actual results, was 32% (19/60). The stone-free rates for solitary stones, two or three stones, and four or more stones were 50%, 12%, and 26%, respectively. Regardless of number of stones, patients who ultimately became stone free had significantly smaller mean fragment size (0.25 cm) 2 weeks after lithotripsy than did those who did not become stone free (0.51 cm). Retrospective volume analysis showed that seven (47%) of 15 patients with multiple stones occupying less than 2000 mm3 were stone free; none became stone free when this volume was exceeded. Lithotripsy remains a practical option for patients with solitary stones. Comparable stone-free rates to those achieved for solitary stones can be obtained in patients with multiple stones, regardless of their number, provided treatment is aggressive and the stone aggregate is less than 2000 mm3.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the urinary tract in patients with one kidney].

Extracorporeal Shock Waves Lithotripsy (ESWL) is a method of choice in the treatment of lithiasis. Surgical treatment is reduced to minimum, which in our case means 1-2%. Contraindications for using this method are: blood coagulation disorders, manifest tuberculosis, pregnancy, overobesity. Thanks to appropriate indications and technique which is used in an adequate way as well as to various endurological manipulations, removal of a stone by this method is safe, trauma is minimised, which is very important for patients with one kidney. During the last three years, usually in hospital conditions, 57 patients were treated in this way. Removal of a stone was performed by Extracorporeal Shock Waves Lithotripsy as mono therapy in 30 (53%) patients; Extracorporeal Shock Waves Lithotripsy by using Double-J catheter in 16 (28%) patients; Extracorporeal Lithotripsy with urine derivation by percutaneous nephrostome in 11 (19%) patients. Endurological methods were used in 27 patients. Disintegration of stone was performed in the proper way. Full success was reached. Two patients had incrustation of ureteral catheter which had to be removed by surgery. In two other patients with inferior function of one kidney, after brief obstruction, haemodialisis was performed. Our results confirm that this method is nonaggressive, technically perfect for disintegration of urineorgans stone on all levels, followed by small complications which are often solved by endoscopic manipulations.

Humans↗
PubMed1991

The Munich Gallbladder Lithotripsy Study. Results of the first 5 years with 711 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term results of three types of shock wave treatment in patients with radiolucent gallbladder stones. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Single-center trial. PATIENTS: Of 5824 patients with gallstones, 19% were eligible; 711 patients were treated. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as well as adjuvant therapy with bile acids. RESULTS: Lithotripsy was done in three ways, using a water-tank lithotriptor (group A), a water-cushion lithotriptor at low energy levels (group B), and a water-cushion lithotriptor at high energy levels (group C). The rate of complete fragment clearance 9 to 12 months after lithotripsy was done differed significantly among the three groups: Among patients with single stones of 20 mm or less in diameter, the rate of fragment clearance for group A was 76%; for group B, it was 60%; and for group C, it was 83% (P = 0.03). Among patients with single stones of 21 to 30 mm, the rate of fragment clearance for group A was 63%; for group B, it was 32%; and for group C, it was 58% (P less than 0.005). Among patients with two or three stones, the rate of fragment clearance for group A was 38%; for group B, it was 16%; and for group C, it was 46% (P = 0.01). Patients with fragments of 3 mm or less 24 hours after lithotripsy was done showed a higher probability of fragment disappearance than did those with larger fragments (P less than 0.001). The clearance rate was higher in patients who were compliant than in those who were noncompliant with bile acid therapy (P less than 0.001). Adverse effects included liver hematoma in 1 patients, biliary pain attacks in 253 patients (36%), mild biliary pancreatitis in 13 patients (2%), and cholestasis in 7 patients (1%). Elective cholecystectomy was done in 16 patients (2%), and endoscopic sphincterotomy was done in 4 patients (1%). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of complete disappearance of stones after shock wave therapy depends on the size and the number of the initial stones, the diameter of the largest fragment, and the mode of shock wave treatment. Adjuvant therapy with bile acids appears to be important for complete fragment clearance.

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMed1992

Extracorporeal piezoelectric shock wave lithotripsy of salivary gland stones: first clinical experiences.

Piezoelectric lithotripsy was undertaken on 14 patients with salivary stones, none of them requiring anesthesia, analgesics, or sedatives. All salivary stones were fragmented totally during the first lithotripsy session. Four months after treatment with extracorporeal shock waves all patients were free of symptoms, and in seven out of 14 patients no concrement could be found sonographically. The piezoelectric lithotripsy of salivary stones had caused no serious side effects proved by clinical, biochemical, sonographic, and magnetic resonance imaging examinations. Extracorporeal piezoelectric lithotripsy is a new and promising nonsurgical therapy for selected cases of sialolithiasis of the large salivary glands.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Mobile lithotripsy services: best bet for most hospitals.

During its short history, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy has revolutionized the treatment of kidney stones and may well have a substantial impact on gallstone treatment. The two technologies are potential money makers for hospitals if properly planned for and conceived. For the majority of hospitals, shared arrangements, whether they involve leases or joint ventures, are the key to a successful lithotripsy program. Rural and midsized communities have the greatest need for renal lithotripsy, and hospitals in these areas should explore mobile programs. Urban hospitals located in areas where there is already adequate access to lithotripters are well advised to work with established programs unless the price of lithotripters drops significantly. The demand for biliary lithotripsy remains uncertain, but one thing is clear: hospitals that don't prepare for it now will be left behind once the technology finds it niche.

Hospital Shared Services↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotripsy and change of biliary manometry patterns.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotripsy (PTCSL) is used to remove bile duct stones. This work aims to evaluate the clinical usefulness of PTCSL and the reversibility of the terminal bile duct dysfunctions after PTCSL. METHODOLOGY: Thirty patients who underwent PTCSL using mechanical and/or electrohydraulic lithotripsy over the past 10 years (20 patients with common bile duct stones and 10 with intrahepatic bile duct stones) were evaluated. Terminal bile ductal pressure was measured using the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) tube prior to and after lithotripsy by means of variable-load cholangiomanometry. RESULTS: Complete stone extraction was possible in 26 patients (86.7%). The other 4 patients had intrahepatic stones. Complications included 2 cases of hemobilia, one of pneumonia, and 3 of localized peritonitis. Of 26 patients without residual stones, only 4 patients had a linear pressure flow (P-F) pattern which indicates normal biliary tract function prior to lithotripsy. In 17 of 22 patients with other type P-F patterns, however, these types also changed to a linear pattern after complete removal of stones. The P-F pattern of the other 5 patients remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: PTCSL is a safe and efficient method treating biliary tract lesions while preserving the function of the sphincter of Oddi. The terminal biliary tract function normalized after stone removal. Thus, PTCSL was useful for patients with complicated bile duct stones not accessible to endoscopic retrograde management.

Bile Ducts↗