SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Defecography”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources

PubMed2002

Nonsurgical Therapy for Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome.

The treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) remains problematic and is less than ideal. Prospective, well-designed studies assessing the efficacy of treatment for SRUS are few; most of the knowledge imparted for treating SRUS is experiential. As such, firm treatment recommendations can not be made. Rather, a conservative, stepwise, individualized approach must be employed. Diagnostic modalities should be incorporated in the management scheme to direct treatment when indicated. Management must include patient reassurance that the underlying lesion is benign, because complete "cures" are uncommon in those with SRUS. The goals of therapy should be discussed with the patient prior to initiating treatment. Although the ultimate goal is macroscopic and microscopic healing, a realistic goal is cessation or minimization of symptoms. We outline a reasonable approach to the management of SRUS. Histologic confirmation of SRUS should prompt a discussion of the presumed pathogenic mechanisms with the patient. Conservative therapy with dietary fiber, bowel retraining, and bulk laxatives should be employed. If symptoms persist, the patient should receive a trial of sucralfate enemas for 6 weeks. Individuals who respond should continue conservative therapy. However, if symptoms persist, defecography can be done to assess for inappropriate puborectalis contraction and occult rectal mucosal prolapse. Patients with inappropriate contraction of the puborectalis can be offered biofeedback. Patients with occult rectal mucosal prolapse can be considered for surgery. However, the risks, benefits, and success rates of surgery should be discussed at length, prior to any procedure being performed. Rectopexy or Delorme's procedure offer the best success rates to date; however, the choice of surgical procedure must take into account the experience of the surgeon and wishes of the patient.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2005

Pelvic outlet obstruction.

Despite the wide variety of definitions and descriptions of constipation, ideally, the diagnostic approach should be uniform. The evaluation process should begin with a careful and thorough patient history and physical exam; appropriate efforts should be made to exclude organic causes of constipation. Patients suffering from pelvic outlet obstruction often respond poorly to conservative treatment. Diagnostic tests include intestinal transit studies, anorectal manometry, defecography, balloon expulsion, and anal sphincter electromyography. For many patients constipation is multifactorial and accordingly, so is the treatment. In our opinion the first line of treatment should be based on conservative measures including adequate intake of fluids, dietary fiber supplementation, and laxatives. Biofeedback training should be offered, particularly to patients with paradoxical puborectalis contraction. Surgical management can, in very limited circumstances, be offered only to those patients with disabling symptoms who have failed other standard therapeutic measures.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1991

Continence after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty.

Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) was introduced in 1982 by Peña and De Vries as a new operation for patients with a high anorectal malformation. The degree of postoperative continence is reported to be high. During the past decade, too, new insights have been gained into the embryology of anorectal malformations. Evaluation of PSARP in relation to current understanding of the development and anatomy of the anorectum and the pelvic floor has led us to conclude that optimal continence cannot be expected. Fifty patients with a high anorectal malformation underwent PSARP between June 1983 and May 1990. Postoperative follow-up consisted of anamnesis (subjective) and electrostimulation, defecography, and anorectal manometry (objective). All patients are alive, and all but one are being evaluated regularly. Subjectively, the majority of patients were more or less incontinent, with soiling of pants at least once a day. On the basis of objective criteria, virtually all patients appeared to be incontinent, and in only one patient was the mechanism of defecation almost unimpaired after PSARP. From this study, we conclude that although PSARP provides a good aesthetic result, patients will never acquire normal continence.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1995

Transposition of the antropylorus for anal incontinence--an experimental model in the pig.

An experimental model in the pig rendered incontinent of feces was developed to assess the sphincteric activity of the transposed antropylorus. In the control group, normal defecation was studied clinically, radiologically, and manometrically. Nineteen 7- to 10-week-old pigs were rendered incontinent by resection of 20 cm of colon and rectum to below the dentate line. The antropylorus was prepared on its own blood supply and transposed to the anus, initially with a colostomy, which was closed 15 to 21 days later. Clinically these pigs passed semisolid stool in a piecemeal fashion. Contrast defecography showed hold-up at the pylorus, reflux of contrast into the colon, with pyloric contraction independent of antral stimulation. Manometry showed pyloric contraction with rise in antral pressure and independence. The authors conclude that transposition of an antropyloric segment to the anus provides a sphincter-like mechanism and could have application in fecal incontinence.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Posterior vaginal wall prolapse does not correlate with fecal symptoms or objective measures of anorectal function.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship among the degree of posterior vaginal wall prolapse, anorectal symptoms, and physiology. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective study that included patients with fecal dysfunction and prolapse/urinary symptoms. A validated instrument for fecal incontinence and the ROME II criteria were used. Anal physiologic testing was performed selectively on the basis of bowel symptoms. Patients were divided into 2 groups by pelvic organ prolapse quantification score clinical examination: group I: Ap/Bp < -1, and group II: Ap/Bp > or = -1. The association among the degree of prolapse, bowel symptoms, and physiologic findings was examined with the use of Fisher's exact test and logistic regression models. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-two patients with a mean age of 63 years (range, 24-90 years) were evaluated. There were 62 patients (47%) in group I and 70 patients (53%) in group II. Overall, 40.9% of the patients had constipation/obstructed defecation, and 25% of the patients had fecal incontinence. Ninety-seven patients underwent physiologic testing. At manometry, both resting and squeeze pressures were significantly higher in patients in group II. Overall, patients with a higher resting pressure (P = .001) and increased rectal capacity (P = .008) were more likely to be continent, and patients with a lower squeeze pressure were more likely to be incontinent (P = .001). Ultrasonography demonstrated anterior sphincter defect in 21.9% of the patients and a perineal body of <10 mm in 35.6% of the patients, with no correlation with the degree of prolapse. Patients with sphincter defects were 3 times more likely to have fecal incontinence (95% CI, 1.03, 8.75; P = .04). There was no association between electromyography and pudendal nerve terminal latencies and the degree of prolapse. Patients with prolonged pudendal nerve terminal latencies were more likely to be incontinent (P = .033). On defecography, 28% of the patients had concomitant enterocele, and 21.3% of the patients had intussusception, which was not detected by physical examination. CONCLUSION: Anorectal symptoms do not correlate with the degree of posterior vaginal wall prolapse, nor does the presence of prolapse equate to abnormal physiologic test results. Bowel symptoms may result from primary anorectal abnormalities, which are demonstrated by physiologic studies.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

[Transperineal repair of rectocele with prosthetic mesh. A prospective study].

PURPOSE: To assess the long term results of a transperineal repair of rectocele with a prosthetic mesh and the criteria for selecting the patients. METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients (median age: 60 years) with a symptom-giving rectocele have been operated upon. Indication for surgery was: an obstructed defecation (N = 22); a fecal incontinence (N = 1); a pelvic heaviness with dyspareunia (N = 1) or a severe rectal syndrome (N = 1). Patients were evaluated by physical examination and, preoperatively, by defecography and anorectal manometry. The rectovaginal septum was repaired, through a perineal approach, with an absorbable (N = 5) or non absorbable (N = 20) prosthetic mesh. Long term results were assessed after a median follow-up of 45 (range 12-120) months by physical examination and a standardized questionnaire. The presence of the following three symptoms was evaluated: feeling of incomplete emptying, prolonged and unsuccessful straining at stool, digital assistance. Outcome was considered as successful when none of these symptoms were present, as good when minor emptying difficulties persisted, as moderate when emptying difficulties were associated with straining, as a failure when the symptomatic triad was unchanged. A general satisfaction score was established. RESULTS: All the patients had the defect of the rectovaginal septum corrected. Four patients had a low residual rectocele associated, in two cases, with a rectal prolapse subsequently treated by a Delorme's operation. Outcome in patients complaining of obstructed defecation was considered excellent or good in 80% of patients, moderate in 9% and poor in 9%. Subjective scoring showed a significantly better result in cases of success. Among 11 incontinent patients, seven (63.5%) improved or regained full continence. Dyspareunia in three cases was corrected. Age, parity, digital assistance, previous gynecologic surgery, use of laxatives, size of rectocele, type of mesh, anatomical result of repair had no significant prognostic value. On the other hand, in patients with obstructed defecation, clinical and manometric signs of anal hyperactivity of the pelvic floor or anismus (N = 4) were significantly related to a poor result (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Surgical repair with a prosthetic mesh is an efficient therapy in patients with obstructed defecation and/or incontinence caused by a rectocele. Clinical and defecographic parameters have no influence on outcome. Preoperative manometric data may help in selecting patients. In case of anal hyperactivity or anismus, given the risk of functional failure, behavioral retraining must be considered as first-line treatment.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

[Surgical management for slow-transit constipation].

Less than 10% of patients with slow-transit constipation require surgical management after failure of medical treatment. Preoperative clinical, psychological and colorectal routine investigations (ie colonic transit test, anorectal manometry and defecography) are mandatory in order to highly select the patients. To day, the surgical management of slow-transit constipation consists of subtotal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis, eventually by laparoscopic approach. Although, surgical management improves slow-transit constipation in two thirds of the patients, small bowel obstruction, abdominal pain and constipation recurrence can occur in 25%, 50%, and 10% of the patients respectively.

Constipation↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Anterior modification of Delorme procedure provides equivalent results to Delorme procedure in treatment of rectal outlet obstruction.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to assess the results of the standard Delorme procedure versus an anterior modification of the Delorme procedure in the treatment of patients with rectal outlet obstruction secondary to internal intussusception with or without rectocele. STUDY DESIGN: A descriptive retrospective study from October 1997 to May 2001 was undertaken. Twenty-seven patients with symptoms of rectal outlet obstruction assumed to be caused by internal rectal prolapse or a combination of internal rectal prolapse and rectocele underwent surgical repair. Twenty-two patients had preoperative defecography and anal manometry. Thirteen patients had an anterior Delorme repair; 14 patients had a standard Delorme repair. Selection of procedure was chronologic with the standard Delorme undertaken in the earlier group. Preoperative and operative data were collected retrospectively. RESULTS: Twenty-seven women, aged 29 to 94 (mean, 62.0 for anterior Delorme, 66.3 for Delorme) years were followed up for the duration of the study (mean follow-up, 15.9 months for anterior Delorme and 32.1 months for Delorme). Twelve patients (92.3%) reported a good to excellent overall result after the anterior Delorme procedure versus 14 patients (100%) in the Delorme group. Symptomatic improvement was observed in 85.7% of patients who had incomplete evacuation in the anterior Delorme group versus 90.9% in the Delorme group. Symptoms of constipation, bleeding, and the need to manually assist in defecation by pushing in the perineum or vagina improved in 100% of patients in both groups. Discontinuation of laxative use after the procedure was reported by 75% of patients in the anterior Delorme group versus 100% in the Delorme group. Eight patients experienced minor complications, 4 of these being urinary retention. In the postoperative period, no patients in the modified group experienced incontinence. Sixty three percent of the Delorme group experienced some sort of incontinence within the first 2 to 3 months (p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: An anterior modification of the Delorme procedure, which requires less operative dissection, can be performed with results nearly equivalent to those of the established Delorme procedure in the treatment of rectal outlet obstruction secondary to internal intussusception with or without rectocele.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic floor in children and adolescents with vesical and anorectal malformations.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvic floor allows better assessment of pelvic pathology and has a potential as an adjunct for therapy planning. In complex congenital malformations of the pelvic floor and continence organs, it plays a major role in assessing urinary and fecal incontinence or constipation, especially when performed as a dynamic investigation such as MRI defecography. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients (3-21 years old) with urinary and/or fecal incontinence or constipation attributable to congenital malformations of the pelvic region presented at our institution. The diagnoses were anorectal malformations (18), bladder exstrophy (2), and cloacal exstrophy (3). All patients underwent static and dynamic MRI of the pelvic floor with rest, squeeze, and evacuation in supine position. RESULTS: Morphology and function of the pelvic floor and pelvic organs could be demonstrated in each case. The reason for urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, or constipation could be defined, and an individual therapeutic management concept was made based upon the data obtained by the investigation. CONCLUSIONS: The advantages of this method, in comparison to others, are direct visualization of the pelvic floor muscles and continence organs and their anatomical relationship during different functional actions. Pelvic floor dysfunction is often the reason for fecal and urinary incontinence and can be detected by MRI. Especially in children, minimizing radiation exposure is of major concern. Disadvantages are the costs and long investigation time.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Is total colectomy the right choice in intractable slow-transit constipation?

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the functional results of surgical treatment for intractable slow-transit constipation and to establish that the importance of correct diagnosis and type of colon resection (total or segmental) is essential to achieve optimal outcome while minimizing side effects. METHODS: Between 1995 and 2004, of the 450 patients presenting with chronic constipation, we further investigated 33 patients with a diagnosis of slow-transit constipation that had not improved with medical or rehabilitative treatment. Preoperative evaluation included a daily evacuation diary compiled using Wexner score, psychologic assessment, Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), radiologic investigation of colonic transit time, enema radiograph, colpo-cysto-defecography, anal manometry, and, in selected patients, colonoscopy and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency. In 15 cases, the cause of constipation was colonic slow-transit (with a mean Wexner score of 22), which was always associated with dolichocolon. The other 18 patients presented outlet obstruction, and, therefore, these results are not included in the present report. The 15 patients with slow-transit constipation were submitted to total laparoscopic colectomy (2), total open colectomy (6), and left laparoscopic hemicolectomy for left colonic slow-transit (7). RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 38 months. All patients except 1 presented improvement in symptoms with daily evacuations (P < .01; mean Wexner score, 6). Furthermore, results of the SF-36 test showed an improvement in the perception of physical pain, and the emotional, psychologic, and general health spheres after surgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Meticulous preoperative evaluation of intractable slow-transit constipation may discriminate between the different causes of chronic constipation and thus avoid the well-known "Iceberg syndrome," which is responsible for many treatment failures.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Diagnosis and assessment of sigmoidoceles.

OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed the clinical presentation, incidence, characteristics as demonstrated by defecating proctography, and surgical outcomes of sigmoidoceles. STUDY DESIGN: Defecating proctograms were obtained on all women with clinical evidence of pelvic floor defects between June 1, 1991, and June 30, 1995. The proctograms were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of a sigmoidocele and concomitant pelvic hernias. The distance between the maximum point of sigmoid descent with strain and the perineal body was measured. A chart review was performed to obtain clinical history, physical examination results, surgical treatment, and outcome. RESULTS: Nine sigmoidoceles (4.0%) were noted in 234 defecating proctograms. The leading edge of the sigmoid hernia ranged from 3.8 cm beyond the perineal body to 8 cm above the perineal body. All nine patients were found to have concomitant rectoceles by proctography, whereas only three were found to have enteroceles. Physical examination before proctography suggested that six patients had vaginal vault prolapse with enterocele, one patient had uterine prolapse with an enterocele, and two patients had rectoceles alone. Five of the seven patients clinically diagnosed with an enterocele showed no small bowel herniation on defecography. No sigmoidoceles were suspected by physical diagnosis alone. All rectoceles were diagnosed by clinical examination. All patients except one, who had concomitant rectal prolapse, complained of constipation. Two patients required manual pressure to the perineum or vagina to defecate. Seven of the nine patients underwent pelvic reconstructive surgery. The surgical procedure for sigmoidocele was determined by severity of constipation, degree of prolapse, and sigmoid redundancy at the time of surgery. Two patients underwent sigmoid resection with sigmoidopexy, one patient had sigmoidopexy alone, and four patients had Halban obliteration of the cul-de-sac. Two patients are successfully using pessaries. Follow-up from 4 months to 2 years (mean 12 months) showed no recurrence of an apical defect by clinical examination. One patient had a recurrent rectocele to the hymenal ring with strain. Five patients had no complaints of constipation, whereas two noted improvement but continued symptoms. Both these patients had Halban procedures only, and one had the recurrent rectocele. CONCLUSIONS: Sigmoidoceles are an uncommon but not rare finding with apical support defects. Physical examination alone does not make the diagnosis. All patients had a rectocele, which substantiates a posterior vaginal support defect. In these patients there was a strong association with constipation that responded to surgical correction, but the degree of anatomic distortion did not always correlate with functional impairment.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Randomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse.

BACKGROUND: This randomized prospective study compared the outcome of circular hemorrhoidectomy according to the Hospital Leopold Bellan (HLB) technique (Paris) with Longo stapled circumferential mucosectomy (LSCM) in two homogeneous groups of patients affected by circular fourth-degree hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse. METHODS: From December 1996 to December 1999, 80 consecutive patients with fourth-degree hemorrhoids and external mucosal prolapse were randomly assigned to two groups. Forty patients (group A: 18 men, 22 women, mean age 50.5 years, range 21 to 82) underwent HLB hemorrhoidectomy, and 40 patients (group B: 15 men, 25 women, mean age 51.0 years, range 29 to 92) underwent LSCM. Before surgery, all patients were selected with a standard questionnaire for symptom evaluation, full proctological examination, flexible rectosigmoidoscopy, dynamic defecography, and anorectal manometry. No significant differences among the two groups were found. All patients were controlled with follow-up questionnaire and with clinical examination at 1, 2, 4, 12, and 54 weeks after the operation. A postoperative manometry was performed 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: The length of the operation was significantly lower in group B (25 +/- 3.1 SD versus 50 +/- 5.3 minutes, P <0.001). Mean hospital stay was 3 +/- 0.4 days in group A and 2 +/- 0.5 days in group B (P <0.01). Mean duration of inability to work was 8 +/- 0.9 days in group B and 15 +/- 1.4 days in group A (P <0.001). Postoperative pain was significantly lower in group B (P <0.001). Mean length of follow-up was 20 +/- 8.0 months in group A and 20 +/- 7.8 months in group B. Late complications were similar in the two groups, with 0%, at present, recurrence rate. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that both operations are safe, easy to perform, and effective in the treatment of advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse. However, the LSCM seems to be preferable owing to the fewer postoperative complications, easier postoperative management, and shorter time to return to work. A longer follow-up is required to confirm the true efficacy of this surgical method.

Adult↗

PubMed1986

Results of levatorplasty for anal incontinence.

Since the introduction of the levatorplasty, 44 patients were operated upon for anal incontinence on our service. In 31 patients, a levatorplasty was performed. The selection of the levatorplasty as operative procedure was based on the availability of a functional levator as demonstrated by physical examination, anorectal manometry, and defecography. The 31 patients ranged from infancy to 76 years of age and 30 of them were followed up to 7 years with an average of 3 years. In 18 patients with fecal incontinence following operative procedures for anorectal malformations, satisfactory continence was restored in 8, improvement was found in 6, and 4 patients remain incontinent. In 13 patients with incontinence following operative procedures or trauma, the postoperative results were satisfactory in 9 patients, 2 improved, and 2 failed. The review showed that the levatorplasty was most successful in patients in whom the revised but normally innervated levator replaces a destroyed external sphincter in the presence of an intact internal sphincter. Only one half of all patients with major incontinence following an operative procedure for anorectal malformations had an adequate levator that allowed successful restoration of function. The review showed that the levatorplasty can improve or restore anal continence in a variety of conditions in properly selected patients.

Anal Canal↗

PubMed2006

[The solitary rectal ulcer syndrome].

The solitary rectal ulcer syndrome is a rare debilitating disorder of the rectum characterized by perianal chronic pain with passage of blood and mucus. The pathogenesis remains uncertain, rectal prolapse and trauma from straining are the main hypothesis. The diagnosis includes clinical symptoms associated with endoscopic lesion (erythema, ulcer or polypoïd lesion) and histological features. Mano-metric studies and defecography are helpful to determinate an underlying defecation disorder or rectal prolapse. The treatment is controversial including a conservative option (medications and behavioural therapy) with poor long term results, and the surgical option (treatment of a rectal prolapse with or without resection of the lesion), more aggressive with uncertain results in a long follow-up period.

Humans↗

PubMed2003

[Surgical therapy of fecal incontinence].

The algorithm of the treatment of the stool-incontinence starts with the differentiation between soiling and incontinence for flatus, liquid or formed faeces. In case of soiling, first all the causes that can be surgically solved should be treated. If this is not successful, the scheme of the incontinence-treatment should be followed. The first step is a dietary consultation, which includes prescription of appropriate drugs against diarrhoea, constipation and proctitis. The anal-physiological examinations will inform about the elasticity of the ampulla recti, which can be reduced in inflammatory processes, it will as well inform about the innervations of the ano-rectum and allow an objective sphincter pressure. If dietary therapy and drugs intake fail, the anal sphincter should be more closely examined. An endosonography or a perineal sonography and in case of a rectocele with incontinence a defecography need to be performed. In case of intact or defective sphincter a biofeedback training is started. If this is not successful, a sphincter-repair is performed in case of defective sphincter. To maintain the result the biofeedback training is continued. In case of failure as well as in case of intact sphincter that cannot be treated with the help of the biofeedback training, sacral nerve stimulation is indicated. If this does not work, the next step will be a dynamic graciloplasty or an artificial bowel sphincter. Both these methods are also indicated when the sphincter is missing. If this fails an anus praeter would definitively improve the quality of life of the patients. With bedridden or heavy demented patients, the anus praeter is often the first choice of procedure. The costs of the expensive pacemaker of the sacral nerve stimulation or the dynamic graciloplasty as well as the artificial bowel sphincter scare the insurances. Talking about cost and benefit these appliances are interesting as already in two years the costs a permanent anus praeter is causing are higher than the price of these medical appliances. In this overview article, different surgical procedures are described considering their indications, results and operative principles. The step-by-step use of the proposed algorithm leads to an optimal treatment of the stool-incontinence.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2002

[Gastrointestinal motility disorders relevant to general practice].

Gastroesophageal reflux disease, achalasia and esophageal spasms are the most frequent esophageal motility disorders and are associated with dysphagia and non-cardiac chest pain. The diagnosis of achalasia is based on manometric criteria. Pneumatic dilatation, laparoscopic myotomy, and the minimal invasive injection of botulinum toxin are therapeutic options. Long-term-pH-metry is the gold standard to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux disease. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are the first-line therapy in reflux disease. Esophageal manometry and pH-metry are essential investigations prior to an antireflux operation. The evaluation of chronic constipation refractory to medical treatment should include anal manometry, and MR-defecography for the diagnosis of anorectal outlet obstruction such as anismus which could be treated successfully by biofeedback therapy.

Chronic Disease↗

PubMed2001

Long-term results of subtotal colectomy for severe slow-transit constipation in patients with normal rectal function.

OBJECTIVE: The outcome of subtotal colectomy for severe constipation may be difficult to predict. One factor, which probably is of major importance for the functional outcome, is rectal function. The aim of the study has been to evaluate long-term results after subtotal colectomy with ileo-rectal anastomosis in a group of patients with severe slow-transit constipation but without evidence of impaired rectal emptying. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 273 patients with constipation referred for surgical evaluation 18 (7%) fulfilled our criteria for subtotal colectomy. Slow-transit was confirmed by radio-opaque marker studies and normal rectal function by emptying of viscous fluid and normal emptying at defecography. RESULTS: At follow up between 3 and 9 years 15 patients had a bowel frequency between 2 and 6 daily. One patient, who had an ileostomy because of anastomotic leak, had not wanted bowel continuity restored. One patient with opiate abuse became less constipated with 2-3 bowel movements a week. One patient was still constipated one year after the operation and subsequently had an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. This patient who had normal rectal emptying had a very high volume tolerability with a maximum tolerable volume of 700 ml. In 4 of 7 patients abdominal pain persisted after the operation, and 3 developed diarrhoea, which required daily intake of loperamide. CONCLUSION: Subtotal colectomy for severe slow-transit constipation is justified provided anorectal function is normal. In spite of normal rectal emptying very high rectal volume tolerability may be an indicator of functional megarectum and impaired rectal emptying postoperatively.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2004

Successful treatment of cap polyposis with infliximab.

Cap polyposis is a disorder characterized by bloody diarrhea with rectosigmoid polyps covered by a cap of fibropurulent exudate. The pathogenesis is unknown, but histological features suggest that mucosal prolapse may play a role. Drug therapies are usually unsuccessful, and treatment requires sigmoid resection or, if the disease recurs after initial surgical resection, panproctocolectomy. We report the case of a 36-year-old woman with characteristic clinical, endoscopic, and histological features of cap polyposis. Investigations included normal anorectal manometry and defecography, without evidence of prolapse. The patient's disease was unresponsive to treatment with mesalamine, antibiotics, lidocaine enemas, and corticosteroids. One infusion of infliximab 5 mg/kg provided dramatic symptomatic improvement but minimal endoscopic or histological change. After 4 infliximab infusions at 8-week intervals, endoscopy of the rectum and sigmoid colon was normal, and biopsies showed complete histological resolution of the inflammatory process. Well-being with normal endoscopy and histology has been maintained at 38 months, without further treatment. It was concluded that infliximab is effective therapy for cap polyposis and avoids the requirement for surgery. No clinical evidence was obtained to support mucosal prolapse as a causative factor, but the response to infliximab suggests a role for tumor necrosis factor-alpha in the pathogenesis of this disorder.

Adult↗