Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “DERMATOLOGY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Use of complementary medicine among outpatients with dermatologic conditions within Yorkshire and South Wales, United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND: The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is increasing throughout the Western world, particularly by patients with chronic disease. In 1999, 20% of the United Kingdom population reported that they had used CAM in the preceding 12 months. OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the use of CAM by outpatients with general dermatologic conditions in 3 United Kingdom cities: Leeds (North England), and Cardiff and Swansea (South Wales). METHODS: Independently constructed, anonymous, self-directed questionnaires were designed and distributed to 400 consecutive outpatients with dermatologic conditions in Leeds and 637 consecutive outpatients with dermatologic conditions in Cardiff and Swansea. RESULTS: In Leeds 302/400 questionnaires were fully completed with 39% patients having used CAM. In South Wales 415/637 questionnaires were fully completed with 34% having used CAM. Of these, 45% of patients in Leeds and 50% of patients in South Wales were using CAM to treat their dermatologic condition. The most popular treatments in Leeds, Cardiff, and Swansea were herbal medicine and homeopathy. LIMITATIONS: These results were obtained from outpatients with dermatologic conditions in the United Kingdom and may not be applicable to other populations. CONCLUSIONS: More than one third of outpatients with general dermatologic conditions in two geographically distant regions are using CAM. More than 45% of these patients used CAM to treat their dermatologic condition.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Off-label prescribing in the treatment of dermatologic disease.

BACKGROUND: It is common practice for physicians to treat dermatologic conditions with medications that are not indicated for the specific condition being treated. These "off-label" prescriptions are often for medications that have both well accepted therapeutic value in the medical community and proven efficacy on the basis of results of clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to quantify the use of off-label prescriptions for dermatologic disease by a representative sample of physicians in the United States. METHODS: Data from the 1990-1997 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, performed by the National Center for Health Statistics, were used to assess medications prescribed at office visits for dermatologic disease. We identified the most common diagnoses listed at office visits in which the primary and only diagnosis listed was dermatologic. For the leading 10 dermatologic conditions for which medications are indicated, we categorized each primary drug mention by indication. RESULTS: We found that the range of off-label prescribing varied from 17% to 73%, with a weighted mean (+/- SD) of 32% +/- 18%. The conditions most frequently managed with off-label prescriptions were acne rosacea (73%) and actinic keratosis (52%), whereas those with the fewest off-label prescriptions were atopic dermatitis (17%) and psoriasis (16%). The use of off-label prescriptions by dermatologists in the diseases studied ranged from 7% to 73% with a weighted mean (+/- SD) of 24% (+/- 24%), whereas the range for nondermatologists was 18% to 96% with a weighted mean (+/- SD) of 34% (+/- 18%). CONCLUSION: Off-label prescribing is common in the management of dermatologic conditions. From these data, we conclude that it is currently within the standard of care to use off-label prescriptions in the treatment of dermatologic disease.

Drug Labeling↗
PubMed2005

Features of patients with vulvar dermatoses in dermatologic and gynecologic practice in Turkey: is there a need for an interdisciplinary approach?

AIM: Vulvar dermatoses are very common problems in women and they are associated with significant morbidity. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the features of patients with vulvar diseases in gynecology and dermatology out-patient clinics in Turkey, and to determine the need for a multidisciplinary vulvar clinic in this country. METHODS: A total of 310 patients with vulvar problems as their primary complaints were included in the study. There were 144 women from a dermatology clinic and 166 women from a gynecology clinic. The following factors were recorded for all patients: physical examination findings, menarche age, age at first intercourse, education level, marital status, clinical diagnoses and associated gynecologic problems. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups when the mean age, menarche age and age at first intercourse were compared (P > 0.05). The number of unmarried women was statistically significantly higher in the dermatology group than in the gynecology group (P < 0.0001). The number of women who graduated from high school and university was also statistically significantly higher in the dermatology group than in the gynecology group (P < 0.01). The frequency of gynecologic problems was statistically significantly higher in the gynecology group than in the dermatology group (P < 0.001); however, dermatologic conditions were the most frequent diagnosis overall (33.54%). Forty patients in the gynecology group were referred to the dermatology clinic. CONCLUSIONS: The approach to patients with vulvar disorders varies from country to country. However, multidisciplinary clinics seem to improve the understanding of vulvar diseases, to make correct diagnoses and to raise patients' quality of life. The need for a multidisciplinary vulvar clinic should not be ignored by the physicians in Turkey.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Evaluation of a general practitioner with special interest service for dermatology: randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness, accessibility, and acceptability of a general practitioner with special interest service for skin problems compared with a hospital dermatology clinic. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: General practitioner with special interest dermatology service and hospital dermatology clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Adults referred to a hospital dermatology clinic and assessed by a consultant or the general practitioner with special interest service,. Suitable patients had non-urgent skin problems and had been identified from the referral letter as suitable for management by a general practitioner with special interest. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomised in 2:1 ratio to receive management by a general practitioner with special interest or usual hospital outpatient care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were disease related quality of life (dermatology life quality index) and improvement in patients' perception of access to services, assessed nine months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction, preference for site of care, proportion of failed appointments, and waiting times to first appointment. RESULTS: 49% of the participants were judged suitable for care by the general practitioner with special interest service. Of 768 patients eligible, 556 (72.4%) were randomised (354 to general practitioner with special interest, 202 to hospital outpatient care). After nine months, 422 (76%) were followed up. No noticeable differences were found between the groups in clinical outcome (median dermatology life quality index score = 1 both arms, ratio of geometric means 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 1.15). The general practitioner with special interest service was more accessible (difference between means on access scale 14, 11 to 19) and waited a mean of 40 (35 to 46) days less. Patients expressed slightly greater satisfaction with consultations with a general practitioner with special interest (difference in mean satisfaction score 4, 1 to 7), and at baseline and after nine months 61% said they preferred care at the service. CONCLUSIONS: The general practitioner with special interest service for dermatology was more accessible and preferred by patients than hospital outpatient care, achieving similar clinical outcomes. Trial registration ISRCTN31962758.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

[Dermatological disease among HIV-infected patients with CD4-lymphocyte count].

OBJECTIVE: To correlate the prevalence of dermatological diseases among HIV-infected patient with CD4-lymphocyte count. METHODS: A case series study was carried out in the region of Caxias do Sul, state of Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Data was collected by reviewing the records of HIV-infected patients admitted to a public hospital (198 patients from March 1998 to June 2002) or seen at the university outpatient clinic (40 patients from March to June 2002). The variables analyzed were: age, sex, CD4-lymphocyte count, viral load, and dermatological diseases. Statistical analyses were performed using Student's t-test, Spearman's and Chi-Square tests. RESULTS: The frequency of dermatological disease was 67.2% among hospitalized patients and 75.0% among outpatients. Oral candidiasis was the most prevalent dermatological disease. Among the hospital population, the average CD4 count was lower among patients with dermatological disease than among those with no disease (142.34 cells/mm3 vs 512.35 cells/mm3, respectively; p=0.018). The same phenomenon was observed in outpatient population (138.88 cells/mm3 and 336.21 cells/mm3, respectively; p=0.001). In both populations, a negative correlation was found between CD4 count and the total number of dermatological diseases by a patient (p=0.000, hospital population, p=0.000, outpatient population). CONCLUSIONS: Dermatological diseases are highly prevalent among HIV-infected patients and the frequency and number of these manifestations are well correlated to the patient's immune status and disease progression.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed1995

[Dermatologic climate therapy--definition, indications and public health necessity].

Dermatological climatotherapy is used in the treatment of chronic and chronically relapsing long-term dermatoses, such as, especially, atopic dermatitis and psoriasis, complementing the dermatological therapies applied at the patient's place of living. It is a classical dermatological in-clinic therapy carried through in specific rough and stimulating climate areas of proven therapeutic benefit, primarily the North Sea climate and certain alpine locations over 1 500 m above sea-level, like especially in the high mountain valley of Davos, Switzerland. Dermatological climatotherapy is a well-tried therapeutic agent which, in comparison to the dermatological therapies applied at home, as a rule has fewer side effects as well as, above all, an additional long-lasting time effect. The latter is of particular importance regarding chronical diseases and cannot be achieved by other therapies. Dermatological climatotherapy, hence, represents an all-entailing therapy form and moreover is the most comprehensive therapy anyway. Dermatological climatotherapy can only be performed in rough and stimulating climate zones with additional special insolation, thermichygric and defined aerosol conditions. On the one hand, the organism is stabilized general by those climatic conditions, and, on the other, the constitutionally damaged skin is affected positively by the direct influence of climate factors. As every climate has its specific overall effect, the therapeutical immediate and long-term effects of a climate have to be proven scientifically by follow-up studies.

Acclimatization↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Psychiatric morbidity among dermatology inpatients.

BACKGROUND: Research on psychiatric morbidity among patients with dermatological diseases generally focuses on outpatients and questionnaire-based surveys. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and nature of psychiatric morbidity among dermatological inpatients with diagnosis being made by psychiatric interview, and ascertain whether demographic and clinical details in dermatological inpatients with psychiatric morbidity differed from those without it. METHODS: Charts of all inpatients admitted by the dermatology department between 1 January 1991 and 31 July 1995 were analysed for socio-demographic data, clinical features, treatment and course in hospital. For those patients who were referred to a psychiatrist, all records of the psychiatric consultation were obtained and analysed. RESULTS: A total of 1073 patients were admitted during the study period. Ninety-eight patients (9%) were diagnosed to have a psychiatric illness. Patients with psychiatric illness were likely to have had more admissions and longer duration of hospital stay. The most common psychiatric diagnoses were depressive episodes (34%) and adjustment disorders (29%). The highest rates of psychiatric morbidity were found among patients with chronic urticaria, exfoliative dermatitis and sexually transmitted diseases, including human immunodeficiency virus infection. The prevalence of psychiatric disorders was significantly higher in those who had received long term (more than six weeks) treatment with high-dose steroids (more than 1 mg/kg body weight of prednisolone). CONCLUSION: Some dermatology inpatients have psychiatric morbidity, which affects the course of the dermatological condition as well as the duration of hospitalization. The availability of psychiatric consultation at dermatology clinics and regular liaison between psychiatrists and dermatologists are essential for appropriate management.

Adjustment Disorders↗
PubMed1999

Top cited authors in dermatology: a citation study from 24 journals: 1982-1996.

BACKGROUND: One measure of the impact of a medical article is how often it is cited in other articles. Many authors of articles published in dermatologic journals are seldom, if ever, cited while other authors are often cited. OBJECTIVE: To identify the 25 authors whose publications in the dermatology literature were most often cited. DESIGN: We obtained a citation database from the Institute for Scientific Information. From this database we separately quantified the total number of citations for each author and the total number of citations to first authors of original articles. SETTING: Dermatology journals. SUBJECTS: All authors of papers published in 24 dermatology journals between 1981 and 1996. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Number of citations. RESULTS: If all articles irrespective of the author's listing (eg, first or second) are counted, the top 25 cited authors in the dermatology literature from 1981 to 1996 were cited between 1480 and 4706 times. If only citations and articles of which an author was the first listed author are counted, the top 25 authors were cited between 400 and 813 times. Only 4 authors were among the top 25 cited authors by both criteria. CONCLUSIONS: A relatively small proportion of all authors account for a high proportion of all citations of the dermatologic literature. The most frequently cited first authors of original articles were different in 84% of cases from the most often cited authors of all papers irrespective of the individuals placement in the authorship listing.

Authorship↗
PubMed1999

Classic and near-classic articles in the dermatologic literature.

BACKGROUND: Only a small fraction of articles published in the dermatologic literature are cited frequently. Articles cited at least 100 times are known as "citation classics" and have been previously discussed. The nature of dermatologic articles cited fewer than 100 times but still much more frequently cited than average has not been clearly elucidated. OBJECTIVE: To identify the source, authorship, and citation history of original articles published in 24 dermatologic journals that were cited more than 25 times. DESIGN: We analyzed a citation database provided by the Institute for Scientific Information. We identified the journal of publication, authorship, and country of authorship for all original articles cited at least 25 times and published from 1982 to 1996 in 24 dermatologic journals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Source of most frequently cited dermatologic articles. RESULTS: Only 2139 (6.45%) of all original articles were cited more than 25 times. Articles published in 4 of 24 journals accounted for the most frequently cited articles. Only 18 (0.13%) of more than 13,500 first authors published at least 5 articles that were cited more than 25 times. CONCLUSIONS: Few articles are cited at least 25 times, and few persons are first authors of multiple articles in the dermatologic literature cited at least that frequently.

Dermatology↗
PubMed1999

Growth of international contributors to dermatologic literature.

BACKGROUND: In the past, authors from a few countries dominated the publication of articles in dermatologic journals that were cited. The growth of dermatology in many additional countries has set the stage for a broader national representation of the authorship of the most frequently cited dermatologic articles. OBJECTIVE: To quantify changes in the number and proportion of citations and articles credited to authors from various countries from 1981 to 1996. DESIGN: We obtained a citation database from the Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, Pa. From this database, we quantified the average number of articles and citations according to the year of publication, journal, and the countries from which authors came. SETTING: Dermatology journals. SUBJECTS: All articles published in 24 dermatology journals between 1981 and 1996. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Country of origin of articles and number of citations of these articles. RESULTS: Authors from 121 countries were credited in whole or in part with authorship of original articles. Ten countries accounted for 82% of all articles published as original articles and 87% of citations to these articles. From 1981 to 1996, the proportion of citations attributed to most western European except Scandinavian countries grew significantly (P<.05, t test), but the proportion credited to authors from the United States fell significantly (P<.05, t test). CONCLUSIONS: International representation of author-cited articles appearing in the dermatology literature is increasing. The growth of scholarly contributions has been especially great for authors from western Europe except Scandinavia.

Dermatology↗
PubMed2004

[Quality assessment of dermatology in the G-DRG system 2004].

BACKGROUND: Since January 2004, all German hospitals have been obliged to operate with a new hospital funding system based on DRGs. For the DRG system to serve as a fair basis for reimbursement requires that the dermatologic services be adequately covered in the classification system. The German Dermatologic Society (DDG) in cooperation with the DRG-Research Group of the University Hospital Muenster carried out a DRG evaluation study. Based on these results, suggestions for the adjustment of the G-DRG system were proposed by the DDG in the G-DRG adaptation round for 2004. METHODS: Based on data of the DRG evaluation project (14,555 dermatological cases from 19 hospitals) the homogeneity in the G-DRG system 2004 was examined and compared with the quality of depiction in the G-DRG version 1.0. RESULTS: The correlation between expenditure and case mix index in the hospitals improved in the G-DRG system 2004. Most proposals submitted by the German Dermatologic Society for the adaptation into the G-DRG system 2004 were accepted. Some fundamental problems such as reimbursement of high cost drugs and special services, as well as the reimbursement of high and low outliers, were only marginally addressed. CONCLUSIONS: The G-DRG system 2004 will need to be continuously adapted in the field of dermatology. Based on this work, the German Dermatologic Society has made suggestions to be adapted in the G-DRG system 2005 and submitted them to the German DRG Institute.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗
PubMed1995

[Rudolf Virchow (1821-1902) and his contributions to dermatology].

The contribution of Rudolf Virchow to dermatology seems to have been forgotten, or present-day dermatologists are not aware of it. The present historical review is intended to show that Virchow's thoughts and the terminology created by him are still alive. The report encompasses a short biography, including Virchow's nonmedical activities. It starts with early experimental publications, which laid to the foundation for his fame, and with dermatological studies of his early period. This is followed by a detailed description of his contributions pertaining to dermatology in his largest work, "Cellular-pathology". Special mention is made of Virchow's lasting contributions to medical, and particularly dermatological, terminology. Finally, his historical studies, his later small publications on topics in dermatology, his pupils and scientific friends, and the social-political and anthropological activities of later years are discussed. Thus, a multifaceted picture is painted of a still modern pathologist who has influenced dermatology in multiple ways.

Dermatology↗
PubMed1992

MD-PhDs in dermatology.

A national survey was conducted to explore ways in which MD-PhDs in dermatology balance their research and clinical interests and the factors that influenced their career decisions. A questionnaire was mailed to all MD-PhDs who were affiliated with dermatology training programs as determined by a preliminary study. The survey consisted of a questionnaire about research background, career pathway, attitudes about personal and professional issues, and influence of residency training program on career decision making. From 60 MD-PhD dermatologists surveyed, 43 (72%) completed questionnaires. Eighty percent of the respondents (34 of 43) held positions in academic medicine; 76% entered dermatology with the intent to pursue academic medicine. Almost all (93%) held academic positions immediately after residency; 50% held positions with the title of assistant professor or higher as their first postresidency employment. Only 26% of the respondents received funding for their MD-PhD through the federally funded Medical Scientist Training Program. Fifty percent of the respondents completed their training with loans. Despite the long period of training and expense required for the dual career, a high percentage (80%) stayed in academic dermatology suggesting that they are an important source for supplying physician-scientists to the field of dermatology. The ability to limit patient care responsibilities and maintain protected time for research may be a factor responsible for the high percentage of MD-PhDs that stay in academic dermatology.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2006

Challenges facing academic dermatology: survey data on the faculty workforce.

BACKGROUND: There is a perception among many academic dermatologists that departments of dermatology face severe challenges with recruitment and retention of faculty. In an era when evidence points to a shortage of dermatologists and residency graduates have plentiful private practice offers in almost every geographic area, some fear that academic programs will face even steeper challenges attracting and keeping enough dermatologists on staff. METHODS: To compare the practice patterns of academic dermatologists with those of the dermatology workforce in other settings, data from the American Academy of Dermatology 2002 Practice Profile Survey were analyzed (1425 respondents, 35% response rate). RESULTS: The mean age of academic dermatologists (45.6 years) was younger than that of those in other practice settings (51.9 years solo practice, 49.0 years multispecialty group), and older age cohorts were significantly less likely to be working in academics (P < .001). Academic physicians were much more likely than those in solo practice or dermatology-only groups (62.2% vs 18.3%-39.4%) to report that their institution or practice was seeking new dermatologists. The average waiting time for new patient appointments varied from a low of 31.1 days in solo practices to a high of 55.9 days in academic practices. Academic dermatologists saw 32% to 41% fewer patients per week, but spent much more time (24.1 vs 5.5-8.6 h/wk) participating in research, hospital consults, medical writing, administrative activities, and teaching than dermatologists in any other setting. LIMITATIONS: Academic dermatologists reflected a relatively small proportion of survey respondents, and may not be representative of the nation's dermatology faculty (although the percentage of academics in the survey was similar to that in the overall workforce). Possible response biases could also have affected the survey results. CONCLUSIONS: The survey results identify a number of differences between the practice patterns of academic dermatologists and their colleagues in other settings, and suggest that academic departments of dermatology may be facing unique workforce challenges.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

State of dermatology training: the residents' perspective.

Changes in health care delivery necessitate modification in dermatology training. While the residents at The University of Alabama at Birmingham were planning their 1995-1996 curriculum, several questions regarding the most appropriate allocation of time and resources arose. Interest in other residency curricula prompted the development of a national survey of dermatology residents. Our purpose was to provide comprehensive data regarding the didactic, clinical, surgical, and other aspects of today's U.S. dermatology residency training from the perspective of the residents. It is hoped these data will assist dermatology residency programs with evaluation of their current curricula. A comprehensive 31-question multiplechoice survey was mailed to 631 residents in 70 U.S. dermatology residency programs. Results were tabulated and median values and percentages of responses were obtained. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test, a chi-square analysis, and logistic regression analysis were performed on survey items on the basis of residents' satisfaction with the training program. Two hundred forty-eight responses (39%) were returned with all years of training well represented. Median values and percentages obtained outlined the didactic, clinical, surgical, and other aspects of dermatology residency training. Seventeen percent of residents believed they were not being adequately trained. Satisfaction with training was noted with more didactic faculty involvement, consultations and research, and surgical procedures performed per month. Residents with enriched didactic, clinical, and surgical training experiences are more satisfied with their training programs.

Alabama↗
PubMed2002

Self-reported dermatological problems and use of prescribed topical drugs correlate with decreased quality of life: an epidemiological survey.

BACKGROUND: Skin problems are common in the population. Although a substantial fraction of the population suffers from skin conditions, we still have little information on how this affects the everyday life of the individuals concerned. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of skin disease on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measured with the Short Form-36 (SF-36), a multidimensional generic HRQOL instrument, from an epidemiological perspective. A further aim was to study differences in HRQOL by use of non-prescription and prescription dermatological drugs. METHODS: The survey was carried out in the county of Uppland, Sweden in a random sample of 8000 individuals aged 20-84 years, of whom 5404 (68%) answered the questionnaire. RESULTS: A large part of the population (20.5%) reported dermatological problems and/or use of topical dermatological drugs, with a higher frequency among women (23.3%) than men (17.3%). Persons reporting dermatological problems scored lower on all eight dimensions of the SF-36. This pattern, although weaker, persisted after adjusting for comorbid somatic as well as psychiatric diseases and complaints. Those using topical dermatological drugs on prescription generally scored lower than the other groups with skin problems: in particular, they evaluated personal health as poorer (general health perceptions), perceived more limitations in daily activities (role limitation because of emotional health problems) and felt more tired and worn out (vitality). CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that skin disorders constitute a substantial problem in the population and cause a significant decrease in HRQOL. Furthermore, the results of this population survey point out the need for further population-based studies more specifically aimed at dermatological problems and HRQOL.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2003

High levels of fusidic acid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in dermatology patients.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistance is a significant problem both in hospitals and the community. Topical antibiotics are widely used for dermatological problems and this may be leading to the emergence of resistant bacteria. OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of fusidic acid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus inpatients with dermatological problems. METHODS: All microbiology samples over a 4-month period were tested for antibiotic sensitivities. Patients with cultures positive for S. aureus were studied. RESULTS: The study shows 50% of S. aureus isolates from dermatology patients were resistant to fusidic acid. This figure rose to 78% inpatients with atopic eczema. Of patients with fusidic acid-resistant S. aureus isolates, 96% had used a fusidic acid-containing preparation within the previous 6 months. The level of fusidic acid resistance in S. aureus samples cultured from nondermatology patients was only 9.6%, a level significantly below that for dermatology patients (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: High levels of fusidic acid-resistant S. aureus are found in dermatology patients. Inappropriate use of topical antibiotics in dermatology patients leading to fusidic acid resistance may threaten the efficacy of systemic fusidic acid for the treatment of serious S. aureus infections. Education of health professionals and restriction of the use of fusidic acid is needed.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2003

Computer assisted learning in medicine: a long-term evaluation of the 'Practical Training Programme Dermatology 2000'.

In recent years, numerous computer assisted learning (CAL) programmes based on new teaching methods, as for example the principles of cognitive apprenticeship and problem based learning, have euphorically been developed for various medical fields. However, many of these programmes failed due to either low acceptance, economic inefficiency, or, most seriously, problems with the implementation and evaluation in medical curricula. In 1999, the practical training course 'Dermatology 2000', an interactive multimedia programme for dermatological education, was developed and completely integrated into the regular dermatological curriculum of five German medical schools. The formative evaluation of an implemented relational database revealed contemporary information about the programme's quantity of use. So far, 3050 students have participated in 6557 lessons. The evaluation of two online questionnaires showed a high learner acceptance regarding the programme's instructional design, ergonomics, and didactical presentation and, after completion of Dermatology 2000, an increased interest in medical education software. A comparison of the objective learning outcome illustrated that Dermatology 2000 students (n = 31) not only outperformed non-participants (n = 7) but also showed a (10%) lower rate of errors in a conventional knowledge test. Additionally, single-case studies demonstrated the increased ability of participating students to apply the acquired knowledge to diagnostic problems. We conclude that the implementation of CAL in present medical curricula can contribute to reformations of medical education. The instructional design of Dermatology 2000 is well accepted and suitable to provide both theoretic biomedical knowledge and clinical skills.

Computer-Assisted Instruction↗