Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cryptochromes”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Structure of a cyanobacterial BLUF protein, Tll0078, containing a novel FAD-binding blue light sensor domain.

The sensor proteins for blue light using the FAD (BLUF) domain belong to the third family of the photoreceptor proteins using a flavin chromophore, where the other two families are phototropins and cryptochromes. As the first structure of this BLUF domain, we have determined the crystal structure of the Tll0078 protein from Thermosynechococcus elongatus BP-1, which contains a BLUF domain bound to FAD, at 2A resolution. Five Tll0078 monomers are located around the non-crystallographic 5-fold axis to form a pentamer, and two pentamers related by 2-fold non-crystallographic symmetry form a decameric assembly. The monomer consists of two domains, the BLUF domain at the N-terminal region and the C-terminal domain. The overall structure of the BLUF domain consists of a five-stranded mixed beta-sheet with two alpha-helices running parallel with it. The isoalloxazine ring of FAD is accommodated in a pocket formed by several highly conserved amino acid residues in the BLUF domain. Of these, the three apparent key residues (Asn31, Asn32 and Gln50) were substituted with Ala. Mutant proteins of N31A and N32A showed a nearly normal 10nm spectral shift of the flavin upon illumination, while the Q50A mutant did not exhibit such a shift at all. On the basis of the crystal structure, we discussed a possible role of Gln50, which is structurally and functionally linked with the critical Tyr8 (FAD-Gln50-Tyr8 network), with regard to the light-induced spectral shift of the BLUF proteins.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2006

Light induces expression of a dehydrin-encoding gene during seedling de-etiolation in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.).

The effects of light quality on the expression of a sunflower dehydrin-encoding gene, HaDhn1, were studied during seedling de-etiolation. Seeds were germinated in the dark and, after 5 days, seedlings were maintained well watered and de-etiolated under different lights for 3, 6, 12, and 24h. Exposure to white light stimulated HaDhn1 transcript accumulation in the cotyledons of these seedlings, contrary to seedlings grown in the dark. HaDhn1 transcripts increased also treating plantlets with monochromatic lights, especially red light. The increase of HaDhn1 transcripts is provoked by the formation of the active form of phytochrome. Further experiments, performed saturating active phytochrome by yellow light, in combination or not with blue light, showed that also cryptochrome can increase HaDhn1 transcripts accumulation after exposure to light. In situ analysis of HaDhn1 expression domains in cotyledons of light-treated seedlings showed a hybridisation signal spread in all mesophyll cells, especially in the basal portion and in the vascular tissue. In the distal portion of the cotyledons, less intense signal was observed. Western blot analysis indicated that HaDhn1 transcription is not followed by dehydrin-protein accumulation. The isolated putative promoter sequence of the HaDhn1 gene showed that different putative cis-elements recognisable by transcription factors occur in the isolated sequence, including a putative light-responsive G-box. On the whole, our results indicate that HaDhn1 gene expression is induced by light during de-etiolation, in absence of water stress.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2005

Connecting the navigational clock to sun compass input in monarch butterfly brain.

Migratory monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) use a time-compensated sun compass to navigate to their overwintering grounds in Mexico. Although polarized light is one of the celestial cues used for orientation, the spectral content (color) of that light has not been fully explored. We cloned the cDNAs of three visual pigment-encoding opsins (ultraviolet [UV], blue, and long wavelength) and found that all three are expressed uniformly in main retina. The photoreceptors of the polarization-specialized dorsal rim area, on the other hand, are monochromatic for the UV opsin. Behavioral studies support the importance of polarized UV light for flight orientation. Next, we used clock protein expression patterns to identify the location of a circadian clock in the dorsolateral protocerebrum of butterfly brain. To provide a link between the clock and the sun compass, we identified a CRYPTOCHROME-staining neural pathway that likely connects the circadian clock to polarized light input entering brain.

Animal Migration↗
PubMed2005

Serotonin modulates circadian entrainment in Drosophila.

Entrainment of the Drosophila circadian clock to light involves the light-induced degradation of the clock protein timeless (TIM). We show here that this entrainment mechanism is inhibited by serotonin, acting through the Drosophila serotonin receptor 1B (d5-HT1B). d5-HT1B is expressed in clock neurons, and alterations of its levels affect molecular and behavioral responses of the clock to light. Effects of d5-HT1B are synergistic with a mutation in the circadian photoreceptor cryptochrome (CRY) and are mediated by SHAGGY (SGG), Drosophila glycogen synthase kinase 3beta (GSK3beta), which phosphorylates TIM. Levels of serotonin are decreased in flies maintained in extended constant darkness, suggesting that modulation of the clock by serotonin may vary under different environmental conditions. These data identify a molecular connection between serotonin signaling and the central clock component TIM and suggest a homeostatic mechanism for the regulation of circadian photosensitivity in Drosophila.

5-Hydroxytryptophan↗
PubMed2006

Melatonin affects nuclear orphan receptors mRNA in the rat suprachiasmatic nuclei.

The pineal hormone melatonin nocturnal synthesis feeds back on the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN), the central circadian clock. Indeed, daily melatonin injections in free-running rats resynchronize their locomotor activity to 24 h. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying this chronobiotic effect of the hormone are poorly understood. The endogenous circadian machinery involves positive and negative transcriptional feedback loops implicating different genes (particularly period (Per) 1-3, Clock, Bmal1, cryptochrome (Cry) 1-2). While CLOCK:BMAL1 heterodimer activates the rhythmic transcription of per and cry genes, the PER and CRY proteins inhibit the CLOCK:BMAL1 complex. In previous studies, we observed that the immediate resetting effect of a melatonin injection at the end of the subjective day on the SCN circadian activity did not directly involve the above-mentioned clock genes. Recently, nuclear orphan receptors (NORs) have been presented as functional links between the regulatory loops of the molecular clock. These NORs bind to a retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor response element (RORE) domain and activate (RORalpha) or repress (REV-ERBalpha) bmal1 expression. In this study, we investigated whether melatonin exerts its chronobiotic effects through transcriptional regulation of these transcription factors. We monitored roralpha, rorbeta and rev-erbalpha messenger RNA (mRNA) expression levels by quantitative in situ hybridization, up to 36 h following a melatonin injection at circadian time (CT) 11.5. Results clearly showed that, while roralpha was not affected by melatonin, the hormone partially prevented the decrease of the rorbeta mRNA expression observed in control animals during the first hours following the injection. The major result is that the rev-erbalpha mRNA expression rhythm was 1.3+/-0.8-h phase-advanced in melatonin-treated animals during the first subjective night following the melatonin administration. Moreover, the bmal1 mRNA expression was 1.9+/-0.9-h phase-shifted in the second subjective night following the melatonin injection. These results clearly suggest that the NOR genes could be the link between the chronobiotic action of melatonin and the core of the molecular circadian clock.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Signalling and gene regulation in response to ultraviolet light.

In contrast to phytochrome-, cryptochrome- and phototropin-sensing systems, about which considerable knowledge has accumulated, the ultraviolet-B (UVB) photoreceptor is not yet known at the molecular level. Information about the downstream signalling events that underlie UVB-provoked physiological responses is limited. Recent whole-genome transcript profiling, isolation of mutants that are impaired in specific UVB-induced responses and detailed photobiological studies suggest that responses that are triggered by shorter wavelength UVB and longer wavelength UVB are mediated by two different sensory systems. The bZIP transcription factor HY5 was recently identified as an important player in the long-wavelength UVB-induced signal transduction cascade. Advances in the development of luciferase-reporter lines will make it feasible to perform high-throughput genetic screens to isolate novel mutants that are impaired in sensing or transducing signals downstream of the putative UVB photoreceptor(s).

Gene Expression Regulation, Plant↗
PubMed2006

Let there be light in the nucleus!

Ambient light conditions trigger both developmental transitions, such as the induction of flowering, and a suite of adaptive responses, exemplified by the shade-avoidance syndrome. These responses are initiated by three families of photoreceptors that are conserved in all higher plants: the phototropins, cryptochromes and phytochromes (phyA--phyE, cry1--cry3, phot1 and phot2 in Arabidopsis). Molecular genetic studies performed mainly in Arabidopsis indicate that photon capture by these light sensors usually initiates rapid changes in the gene expression profile, leading to plant adaptation to their environment. Interestingly, numerous transcription factors are early targets of light regulation, both at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels.

Arabidopsis↗
PubMed2006

CLOCK leaves its mark on histones.

Transcriptional regulation of circadian rhythms in mammals involves a negative-feedback loop whereby a CLOCK-BMAL1 complex activates transcription of the genes encoding the proteins PER1 (Period 1), PER2, CRY1 (Cryptochrome 1) and CRY2, which feed back to inhibit the activity of CLOCK-BMAL1. It is becoming evident that chromatin remodeling has a crucial role in the transcriptional regulation of genes governing circadian rhythms. This is highlighted in a recent report that shows that CLOCK has histone acetyltransferase activity, thus, demonstrating that molecular components of the biological clock can themselves catalyze chromatin modifications.

ARNTL Transcription Factors↗
PubMed2003

Regulation of the PAI-1 promoter by circadian clock components: differential activation by BMAL1 and BMAL2.

Circadian variation in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) production likely contributes to increased risk of myocardial infarction and decreased efficacy of thrombolytic therapy during the morning. In this study, we characterize the abilities of fundamental molecular components of intrinsic circadian clocks to regulate the human PAI-1 promoter in transfected endothelial cells. Both CLOCK:BMAL1 and CLOCK:BMAL2 heterodimers activate the PAI-1 promoter through requisite proximal (-565 to -560 bp) and distal (-680 to -675 bp) E-box enhancers. Although the distal E-box overlaps the 4G/5G polymorphism of the PAI-1 promoter, allelic variation at this site does not influence CLOCK:BMAL1-and CLOCK:BMAL2-mediated transactivation. Together, CLOCK:BMAL1 and CLOCK:BMAL2 make additive contributions to PAI-1 gene transcription. While the abilities of these heterodimers to activate gene expression differ by twofold, the susceptibilities of these circadian activators to inhibition by period and cryptochrome proteins are equivalent and redox independent. Given that BMAL1 and BMAL2 differ in their spatiotemporal distributions, such distinctions may allow intrinsic circadian clocks to modulate the amplitudes of their oscillators, while maintaining circadian periodicity. In this way, fundamental circadian clock components may drive circadian variation in PAI-1, which in turn influences the pathogenesis, timing, and treatment of acute atherothrombotic events.

ARNTL Transcription Factors↗
PubMed2003

Genetics and molecular biology of rhythms in Drosophila and other insects.

Application of generic variants (Sections II-IV, VI, and IX) and molecular manipulations of rhythm-related genes (Sections V-X) have been used extensively to investigate features of insect chronobiology that might not have been experimentally accessible otherwise. Most such tests of mutants and molecular-genetic xperiments have been performed in Drosophila melanogaster. Results from applying visual-system variants have revealed that environmental inputs to the circadian clock in adult flies are mediated by external photoreceptive structures (Section II) and also by direct light reception chat occurs in certain brain neurons (Section IX). The relevant light-absorbing molecuLes are rhodopsins and "blue-receptive" cryptochrome (Sections II and IX). Variations in temperature are another clock input (Section IV), as has been analyzed in part by use of molecular techniques and transgenes involving factors functioning near the heart of the circadian clock (Section VIII). At that location within the fly's chronobiological system, approximately a half-dozen-perhaps up to as many as 10-clock genes encode functions that act and interact to form the circadian pacemaker (Sections III and V). This entity functions in part by transcriptional control of certain clock genes' expressions, which result in the production of key proteins that feed back negatively to regulate their own mRNA production. This occurs in part by interactions of such proteins with others that function as transcriptional activators (Section V). The implied feedback loop operates such that there are daily variations in the abundances of products put out by about one-half of the core clock genes. Thus, the normal expression of these genes defines circadian rhythms of their own, paralleling the effects of mutations at the corresponding genetic loci (Section III), which are to disrupt or apparently eliminate clock functioning. The fluctuations in the abundance of gene products are controlled transciptionally and posttranscriptionally. These clock mechanisms are being analyzed in ways that are increasingly complex and occasionally obscure; not all panels of this picture are comprehensive or clear, including problems revolving round the biological meaning or a given features of all this molecular cycling (Section V). Among the complexities and puzzles that have recently arisen, phenomena that stand out are posttranslational modifications of certain proteins that are circadianly regulated and regulating; these biochemical events form an ancillary component of the clock mechanism, as revealed in part by genetic identification of Factors (Section III) that turned out to encode protein kinases whose substrates include other pacemaking polypeptides (Section V). Outputs from insect circadian clocks have been long defined on formalistic and in some cases concrete criteria, related to revealed rhythms such as periodic eclosion and daily fluctuations of locomotion (Sections II and III). Based on the reasoning that if clock genes can regulate circadian cyclings of their own products, they can do the same for genes that function along output pathways; thus clock-regulated genes have been identified in part by virtue of their products' oscillations (Section X). Those studied most intensively have their expression influenced by circadian-pacemaker mutations. The clock-regulated genes discovered on molecular criteria have in some instances been analyzed further in their mutant forms and found to affect certain features of overt whole-organismal rhythmicity (Sections IV and X). Insect chronogenetics touches in part on naturally occurring gene variations that affect biological rhythmicity or (in some cases) have otherwise informed investigators about certain features of the organism's rhythm system (Section VII). Such animals include at least a dozen insect species other than D. melanogaster in which rhythm variants have been encountered (although usually not looked for systematically). The chronobiological "system" in the fruit fly might better be graced with a plural appellation because there is a myriad of temporally related phenomena that have come under the sway of one kind of putative rhythm variant or the other (Section IV). These phenotypes, which range well beyond the bedrock eclosion and locomotor circadian rhythms, unfortunately lead to the creation of a laundry list of underanalyzed or occult phenomena that may or may not be inherently real, whether or not they might be meaningfully defective under the influence of a given chronogenetic variant. However, such mutants seem to lend themselves to the interrogation of a wide variety of time-based attributes-those that fall within the experimental confines of conventionally appreciated circadian rhythms (Sections II, III, VI, and X); and others that consist of 24-hr or nondaily cycles defined by many kinds of biological, physiological, or biochemical parameters (Section IV).

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of clock proteins.

The mammalian circadian clock in the neurons of suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) in the brain and in cells of peripheral tissues is driven by a self-sustained molecular oscillator, which generates rhythmic gene expression with a periodicity of about 24?h (Reppert and Weaver, 2002). This molecular oscillator is composed of interacting positive and negative transcription/translation feedback loops in which the heterodimeric transcription activator CLOCK?BMAL1 promotes the transcription of E-box containing Cryptochrome (Cry1 and Cry2) and Period (Per1 and Per2) genes, as well as clock-controlled output genes. After being synthesized in the cytoplasm, CRY and PER proteins feedback in the nucleus to inhibit the transactivation mediated by positive regulators. The mPER2 protein acts at the interphase between positive and negative feedback loops by indirectly promoting the circadian transcription of the Bmal1 gene (through RevErbalpha) (Preitner et al., 2002; Shearman et al., 2000) and by interacting with mCRY proteins (Kume et al., 1999; Yagita et al., 2002) (for a detailed review, see Reppert and Weaver, 2002). In addition to cyclic transcription of clock genes, immunohistochemical studies on SCN neurons have revealed that mCRY1, mCRY2, mPER1, and mPER2 proteins undergo near synchronous circadian patterns of nuclear abundance (Field et al., 2000). The delay of approximately 6h between the peak in clock mRNA production and maximal levels of protein expression in the nucleus is believed to originate from posttranslational modification steps involving phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and proteosomal degradation. Thus, the timing of entry, as well as the residence time of core clock proteins into the nucleus, is a critical step in maintaining the correct pace of the circadian clock. Several clock proteins have been shown to contain nuclear export signal, sequences, on top of nuclear import signals, that facilitate their cellular trafficking (Chopin-Delannoy et al., 2003; Miyazaki et al., 2001; Yagita et al., 2002). This type of dynamic intracellular movement not only regulates protein localization, but also often affects functions by determining interactive partners and protein turnover. Because most of the clock genes have been identified by genetic screening in Drosophila and by gene knockdown in mammals, the development of innovative cellular techniques is essential in learning the structure-function and regulation of the corresponding proteins. This article discusses approaches, limitations, and applicable protocols to study the regulation of cellular localization of mammalian clock proteins, with a particular focus on mammalian CRY1 and PER2 proteins.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

The circadian modulation of leptin-controlled bone formation.

Mice with circadian gene Period and Cryptochrome mutations develop high bone mass early in life. Such a phenotype is accompanied by an increase in osteoblast numbers in mutant bone and cannot be corrected by leptin intracerebroventricular infusion. Thus, the molecular clock plays a key role in leptin-mediated sympathetic regulation of bone formation. Indeed, we found that leptin-dependent sympathetic signaling induces the expression of AP1 and circadian genes in bone and in osteoblasts with similar kinetics, and these two pathways play opposite roles in controlling c-myc expression. Mutations in the Period 1 and 2 genes result in uncontrolled c-myc signaling, overexpression of G1 cyclins, and increased osteoblast proliferation and bone-formation parameters. These results indicate that the role of leptin-dependent sympathetic signaling in bone formation is achieved through regulating two antagonistic pathways in osteoblasts.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Posttranslational mechanisms regulate the mammalian circadian clock.

We have examined posttranslational regulation of clock proteins in mouse liver in vivo. The mouse PERIOD proteins (mPER1 and mPER2), CLOCK, and BMAL1 undergo robust circadian changes in phosphorylation. These proteins, the cryptochromes (mCRY1 and mCRY2), and casein kinase I epsilon (CKIepsilon) form multimeric complexes that are bound to DNA during negative transcriptional feedback. CLOCK:BMAL1 heterodimers remain bound to DNA over the circadian cycle. The temporal increase in mPER abundance controls the negative feedback interactions. Analysis of clock proteins in mCRY-deficient mice shows that the mCRYs are necessary for stabilizing phosphorylated mPER2 and for the nuclear accumulation of mPER1, mPER2, and CKIepsilon. We also provide in vivo evidence that casein kinase I delta is a second clock relevant kinase.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

VRILLE feeds back to control circadian transcription of Clock in the Drosophila circadian oscillator.

The Drosophila circadian oscillator consists of interlocked period (per)/timeless (tim) and Clock (Clk) transcriptional/translational feedback loops. Within these feedback loops, CLK and CYCLE (CYC) activate per and tim transcription at the same time as they repress Clk transcription, thus controlling the opposite cycling phases of these transcripts. CLK-CYC directly bind E box elements to activate transcription, but the mechanism of CLK-CYC-dependent repression is not known. Here we show that a CLK-CYC-activated gene, vrille (vri), encodes a repressor of Clk transcription, thereby identifying vri as a key negative component of the Clk feedback loop in Drosophila's circadian oscillator. The blue light photoreceptor encoding cryptochrome (cry) gene is also a target for VRI repression, suggesting a broader role for VRI in the rhythmic repression of output genes that cycle in phase with Clk.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

The ins and outs of circadian timekeeping.

Recent research in Drosophila and in mammals has generated fascinating new models for how circadian clocks in these organisms are reset by light and how these clocks, in turn, direct circadian outputs. Though light perception by the central clock is ocular in mammals, it probably proceeds via a mechanism separate from traditional visual transduction. In Drosophila, one mechanism is non-ocular and is in fact present in many different tissues. In both organisms, the cryptochrome family of photoreceptor-like molecules plays a role in the circadian clock, though their function is incompletely understood. Moreover, although a master clock resides in the brain, a functional clock appears to reside in most cells of the body. In these tissues, at least some output genes are controlled at the transcriptional level directly by clock proteins; others appear to be regulated by cascades of circadian transcription factors. Taken together, these observations are reshaping thinking about inputs and outputs of metazoan circadian clocks.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

BLUF: a novel FAD-binding domain involved in sensory transduction in microorganisms.

A novel FAD-binding domain, BLUF, exemplified by the N-terminus of the AppA protein from Rhodobacter sphaeroides, is present in various proteins, primarily from Bacteria. The BLUF domain is involved in sensing blue-light (and possibly redox) using FAD and is similar to the flavin-binding PAS domains and cryptochromes. The predicted secondary structure reveals that the BLUF domain is a novel FAD-binding fold.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1997

Light induces accumulation of isocitrate lyase mRNA in a carotenoid-deficient mutant of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

A cDNA with sequence similarity to isocitrate lyase (ICL) genes was isolated from the unicellular eukaryotic green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii as a light-induced mRNA in the carotenoid biosynthetic mutant strain FN68. The 416 amino acid open reading frame shows significant sequence similarity to isocitrate lyases of bacteria (70%), molds (48%), yeasts (45%), and plants (47%). Expression of the Chlamydomonas ICL gene was tested in the mutant strain FN68, which when grown in the dark fails to accumulate carotenoids and is deficient in chlorophyll, and in CC400G, a strain that accumulates wild-type levels of carotenoids and chlorophyll. In vegetative CC400G cells, ICL mRNA accumulated to a high level in the dark and declined to a barely detectable level within 30 min of exposure to light. This response was more sensitive to white (tungsten filament) or red light than green or blue light, excluding cryptochrome and rhodopsin as the photoreceptor. These results are consistent with excitation by chlorophyll and/or a phytochrome-related photoreceptor. In vegetative FN68 cells, ICL mRNA abundance was very low in the dark, but increased dramatically in response to light. At intensities above threshold, excitation by far-red or red light-induced ICL mRNA accumulation to the highest levels. The threshold of the response was lowest for far-red and blue light. These results are consistent with excitation of a photochromic far-red-responsive pigment.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1999

Photoregulated expression of the PsPK3 and PsPK5 genes in pea seedlings.

The PsPK3 and PsPK5 genes of the garden pea encode protein-serine/threonine kinases whose catalytic domains are closely related to known signal transducing kinases from animals and fungi. The PsPK3 polypeptide is predicted to be located in the nucleus, whereas PsPK5 is a homologue of NPH1, the probable blue light receptor for phototropism from Arabidopsis. We found previously that when etiolated pea seedlings are illuminated with continuous white light, PsPK3 and PsPK5 transcript levels within apical buds decline substantially, reaching their minimum levels within one day of exposure to light. The role of light in regulating the expression of the PsPK3 and PsPK5 genes was investigated further. To gain insight into the rapidity with which expression changes, 6-day old, dark-grown pea seedlings were transferred to continuous white light, and PsPK3 and PsPK5 RNA levels monitored over the ensuing 24 h. While transcripts from the RbcS gene family increase, the PsPK3 and PsPK5 mRNAs decline rapidly to their minimum levels. PsPK5 mRNA declines 10-fold in ca. 2 h, whereas PsPK3 mRNA declines 4-fold in ca. 8 h. We used single pulses of light to elucidate which photoreceptor triggers the negative regulation of PsPK3 and PsPK5 gene expression. To assess phytochrome involvement, etiolated seedlings were treated with single pulses of red light, red followed by far-red light, or far-red light alone. RbcS induction by a red light pulse is reversible with a subsequent far-red light pulse, clearly showing that phytochrome mediates its induction. Likewise, RbcS expression is induced with a single pulse of blue light or a dichromatic pulse of red+blue light. However, none of these pulses trigger the PsPK3 and PsPK5 mRNA levels to decline. Given the lack of effectiveness of light pulses, etiolated seedlings were transferred to continuous light of three different qualities to determine the spectral sensitivity of PsPK3 and PsPK5 gene expression. Exposure to continuous red, continuous far-red, or continuous blue light causes the PsPK3 and PsPK5 mRNAs to decline and transcripts from the RbcS and Cab gene families to increase. One likely explanation is that phytochrome A mediates the responses of these genes to continuous far-red light. The effectiveness of continuous red light and blue light in triggering the reduction in PsPK3 and PsPK5 mRNA levels and the increase in RbcS and Cab mRNAs may imply the participation of additional phytochromes and/or cryptochromes. Thus, the PsPK3 and PsPK5 genes exhibit responsiveness to continuous light, but a lack of responsiveness to single light pulses that is unusual, and perhaps unique, among light-regulated genes.

Arabidopsis Proteins↗