Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Combination therapy”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources

Downstaging by combination therapy with flutamide and an LHRH agonist before radical prostatectomy.

A total of 161 patients diagnosed as having stage B (134 patients) or C (27 patients) prostate cancer were randomly assigned to radical prostatectomy alone or to 3 months of neoadjuvant combination therapy with the anti-androgen flutamide and an LHRH agonist before radical prostatectomy. Neoadjuvant combination therapy before radical prostatectomy decreased cancer positive surgical margins from 33.8% in the control group to only 7.8%, thus leaving 92.2% of patients with negative margins at surgery for a 39.2% increase in specimen confined disease. Although on average the final stage determined at histopathological examination of the surgical specimen was more advanced than predicted at initial diagnosis in 33.8% of control patients, an opposite observation was made in the group of men who received the 3 month neoadjuvant combination therapy where the final stage, instead of being more advanced, was less advanced than at diagnosis in an average of 21.1% of men for a net 54.9% improvement of staging in favour of combination therapy. On the other hand, organ confined disease increased from 49.3% to 77.8% of patients after 3 months of combination therapy, for a 57.9% increase in the incidence of organ confined disease. Although long term follow up of these patients is required to determine the impact on survival, the marked influence of neoadjuvant combination therapy on the stage of the disease suggests the possibility of a major improvement in the morbidity and mortality from prostate cancer.

Aged↗

Long-term experience with oral or inhaled vasodilator combination therapy in patients with pulmonary hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Disease progression in pulmonary hypertension (PH) is common despite standard vasodilator monotherapy with iloprost, bosentan or sildenafil. OBJECTIVE: To investigate if the combination of these non-invasively applicable treatments is an effective option to address the multiple pathophysiological mechanisms present in PH. METHODS: We analysed the clinical course of 23 patients with PH, diagnosed as idiopathic (n = 15), chronic thromboembolic (n = 4), and associated with collagen vascular disease (n = 4), receiving combination vasodilator therapy at our institution. RESULTS: Vasodilator therapy before combination therapy consisted of inhaled iloprost (I; n = 12), or oral bosentan (B; n = 6) at a mean duration of 19 +/- 3 months. The combination therapy added was B (n = 8), sildenafil (S; n = 6) or I (n = 4) and in five patients, combination therapy was given from the beginning (3x BS, 1x IS, 1x IBS). Under combination therapy, the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) increased significantly by 46.7 +/- 24.8 m (p = 0.02) after three months, and after six months it was still 38.3 +/- 28.3 m (p = 0.17) longer than before combination therapy. Respective changes in the Borg Scale and the NYHA functional class were -1.05 +/- 0.49 (p = 0.014) and -0.42 +/- 0.19 (p = 0.02) after three months and -0.21 +/- 0.65 (p = 0.61) and -0.38 +/- 0.29 (p = 0.26) after six months. Only minor side effects were reported. CONCLUSION: Combination vasodilator therapy in severe PH is safe and well tolerated. It significantly improves exercise capacity and stabilises the functional class in patients with severe PH deteriorating under single-agent therapy.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Initial angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/calcium channel blocker combination therapy achieves superior blood pressure control compared with calcium channel blocker monotherapy in patients with stage 2 hypertension.

BACKGROUND: The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee (JNC 7) on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure recommends initial combination therapy for patients whose blood pressure (BP) is >20/10 mm Hg above goal. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of initial combination therapy versus that of monotherapy in patients with stage 2 hypertension, who by definition meet the JNC 7 recommendation for initial combination antihypertensive therapy. METHODS: This multicenter, double-blind, 12-week study randomized 364 patients with stage 2 hypertension to fixed-dose combination therapy with amlodipine besylate/benazepril HCl (5/20 mg/d titrated to 10/20 mg/d) or amlodipine besylate monotherapy (5 mg/d titrated to 10 mg/d). RESULTS: Significantly more patients randomized to combination therapy (74.2%) compared with those randomized to monotherapy (53.9%; P <.0001) achieved the primary end point (reductions in systolic BP > or =25 mm Hg, if baseline systolic BP was <180 mm Hg, or > or =32 mm Hg, if baseline systolic BP was > or =180 mm Hg). Significantly more patients randomized to combination therapy compared with monotherapy attained BP goals of <140/90 mm Hg (61.0% v 43.3%; P =.0007) and < or =130/85 mm Hg (35.7% v 19.1%; P =.0004). Among patients with baseline systolic BP > or =180 mm Hg, combination therapy resulted in significantly greater reductions in systolic BP compared with monotherapy (-42.3 v -30.4 mm Hg; P =.001). More than 90% of patients in each group were titrated to the higher dose. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy was well tolerated and resulted in significantly greater BP reductions and attainment of BP goals compared with monotherapy in patients with stage 2 hypertension. This evidence supports the recommendation of combination therapy as first-line treatment in stage 2 hypertension.

Adult↗

Choosing between endocrine therapy and chemotherapy--or is there a role for combination therapy?

Results from many randomized trials of adjuvant breast cancer therapy have been presented in several overviews and at subsequent meetings. This manuscript reviews the current status of both chemo- and endocrine therapy and the prospects for combination therapy, as summarized at the NIH and St Gallen Consensus meetings. In conclusion, treatment selection should be based primarily on endocrine responsiveness; however, a collaborative approach involving the development of new agents and investigation of their optimal integration into therapy programs will ensure progress and improved patient care.

Adult↗

Guanabenz combination therapy inhibits sympathetic nerve activity and regresses left ventricular hypertrophy.

The cardiovascular and sympatholytic effects of combination therapy with guanabenz were examined in 26 patients (48 +/- 13 years old [mean +/- SD]) with stage 2 and 3 hypertension. Included in the study were patients under treatment with conventional antihypertensive drugs whose systolic and diastolic blood pressure was above 140 and 90 mmHg, respectively. Blood pressure, heart rate, and sympathetic parameters such as plasma concentration of norepinephrine and muscle sympathetic nerve activity at rest as well as during ambulatory conditions, 24-hour urinary excretion of norepinephrine, and low frequency (LF: 0.04-0.15 Hz)/high frequency (HF: 0.15-0.4 Hz) power ratio as a marker of cardiac sympathetic activity during 24 hours were examined before and after guanabenz (4-8 mg/d) combination therapy with first-line antihypertensive drugs such as diuretics. Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was also calculated by conventional echocardiography. After 32 weeks of guanabenz combination therapy, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, plasma and urinary excretion of norepinephrine, muscle sympathetic nerve activity, and LF/HF power ratio were significantly decreased, while neither LF nor HF power was changed. LVMI was also significantly decreased (270 +/- 81 vs. 236 +/- 83 g/m2, p < 0.005). These results indicate that guanabenz combination therapy inhibits sympathetic nerve activity under resting conditions as well as during ambulatory conditions and may accelerate regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with moderate to severe hypertension.

Antihypertensive Agents↗

The long term effectiveness of combined therapy by behavior modification and very low calorie diet: 2 years follow-up.

Seventy refractory obese subjects were assigned to one of three treatments; (a) very low calorie diet (VLCD) alone; (b) behavior modification alone; and (c) combined therapy by VLCD and behavior modification. Fifteen obese patients were treated by VLCD for 1-2 months on the outpatient clinic; 16 obese patients were treated by a combined therapy and 39 subjects were treated by behavior modification alone. Formula diet used in this program was Optifast 70 (420 kcal/day). The behavior modification had been performed for 4 months with eight group meetings, using the revised textbook based on the Learn Program (University of Pennsylvania). Effects on weight reduction and its maintenance during 2 years follow-up were compared in each treatment group. There were no significant differences between average weight loss of patients treated by VLCD (7.5 +/- 2.1 kg/month) and that attained by the combined therapy (8.3 +/- 2.3 kg/month). At 2 years after the termination of the VLCD treatment, 67 percent of patients had regained more than half of their reduced weight, with an average weight regain of 4.3 +/- 3.5 kg. In contrast, 12 of 16 (75 percent) and 33 of 39 (85 percent) patients had maintained their reduced weight for 2 years after the combined therapy or the behavior modification program. Continuing weight loss of 1.0 +/- 0.7 kg by the combined therapy and 1.3 +/- 2.2 kg by the behavior modification were observed at 2 years of follow-up. Weight reducing effect of combined therapy by behavior modification and VLCD was almost identical with that obtained by VLCD alone in a short term observation of one month.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Behavior Therapy↗

Future studies of combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C: optimizing response rates for each hepatitis C population.

Interferon alfa, the only treatment currently approved for chronic hepatitis C virus infection, has a limited response rate (20-25%) in most patients. Ribavirin has also been used to treat hepatitis C virus infection, but treatment results in only a modest reduction in HCV-RNA levels; most patients relapse after the drug is discontinued. Combination therapy with ribavirin and interferon seems to be a logical approach to the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection. Small studies suggest that combination therapy results in improved sustained response rates compared with either interferon or ribavirin alone. In one study, 6 months of combination therapy was compared with 6 months of ribavirin monotherapy and 6 months of interferon alfa monotherapy. The sustained virologic response rates were 47% for combination therapy, 13% for interferon monotherapy, and 0% for ribavirin monotherapy. This study suggests that combination therapy can potentially double the sustained response rate, but larger studies are needed to evaluate this further. In trial design for clinical studies, many factors must be considered. Determining the response to interferon monotherapy might include establishing liver histology (especially in patients with cirrhosis) and hepatitis C virus genotype--types 1b and 4 are associated with a poor response, which is likely to affect the response to combination therapy. Patients in treatment trials should be followed long term at regular intervals; it is only with prolonged, detailed follow-up that the full effects of antiviral therapy on health and prevention of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma can be determined. Large multicenter studies are also needed to determine the effect of combination therapy in liver transplant patients. These studies must also address toxicity issues, as interferon may increase the risk of graft rejection post-transplant, and the low-grade hemolysis associated with ribavirin may stimulate hepatic iron deposition.

Antiviral Agents↗

Correlation between translation efficiency and outcome of combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C genotype 3.

Combination therapy with interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) and ribavirin (RBV) in chronic hepatitis C demonstrates the best responses against hepatitis C virus (HCV) of genotype 3. Still, it has proven to be ineffective in 20-30% of patients infected with this genotype. In the present study, we analysed the translation efficiency mediated by the internal ribosome entry site (IRES) region in HCV genotype 3 genomes isolated from sustained responders (SR) and non-responders (NR), assuming that this may influence the outcome of treatment. Pretreatment isolates of genotype 3 from 22 individuals (15 SR, seven NR) were selected for such analyses. The IRES region [nucleotide (nt) 1-407] was cloned into a dual luciferase vector and IRES activity assessed following transfection into various cell lines. Low relative translation efficiency was observed for IRES elements derived from SR patients, whereas those of NR patients showed significantly greater translation efficiency (29.7 +/- 13 vs 69.4 +/- 22; P < 0.01). Subsequently, the effect of IFN-alpha plus RBV on IRES-driven translation in vitro was determined. A greater suppressive effect was observed on IRES activity isolated from seven SR patients, when compared with seven NR patients. In conclusion, IRES efficiency in vitro correlated with treatment response for HCV genotype 3. Further studies are warranted to investigate whether IRES efficiency in vitro, or sequence motifs associated with IRES efficiency, will be worthwhile to explore as prognostic tools for other HCV genotypes in the treatment of chronic HCV infection.

Adult↗

Combination therapy using 9,3"-di-O-acetyl-midecamycin with beta-lactam antibiotics against Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection.

The combined effect of beta-lactam antibiotics and 9,3"-di-O-acetylmidecamycin were examined in 10 patients diagnosed as having chronic respiratory tract infections and complicated urinary tract infections. Patients were initially treated with 3 to 10 g/day of beta-lactams as intravenous infusions or by oral route for a certain period, after which period they were treated concurrently with 0.3 to 0.9 g/day of 9,3"-di-O-acetylmidecamycin by oral route. Through this combination therapy eradication of P. aeruginosa was obtained in 2 cases and remarkable decrease in another 2 cases out of the 10 cases. This combination therapy was judged to be effective in these 4 cases. Of the remaining cases, P. aeruginosa was eliminated before the start of the combination therapy in 3 cases, and no change in bacterial count was noted after the combination therapy in the other 3 cases.

Adult↗

Cost effectiveness of cephalosporin monotherapy and aminoglycoside/ureidopenicillin combination therapy. For the treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relative cost effectiveness of cephalosporin monotherapy options and aminoglycoside/ureidopenicillin combination therapy for the treatment of febrile episodes in adult patients with neutropenia. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis conducted from the institutional perspective. METHODS: The analysis was based on 741 febrile episodes in adult patients with neutropenia enrolled in 5 randomised trials: 3 comparing monotherapy with ceftazidime or cefepime, and 2 comparing cefepime monotherapy versus aminoglycoside/ureidopenicillin combination therapy. Resource utilisation included costs for study antibacterials, treatment of adverse effects and failures, and hospitalisation. The primary end-point was the overall cost of treatment per patient. Cost-effectiveness ratios were also analysed. RESULTS: No significant differences in clinical success rates were detected. Median per-patient costs in the monotherapy comparisons were $US7849 for cefepime and $US7788 for ceftazidime [1997 values; not significantly different (NS)]. Corresponding costs for the monotherapy versus combination therapy comparisons were $US9780 for cefepime and $US10 159 for gentamicin/ureidopenicillin (NS). Despite a higher acquisition cost for cefepime, there were no statistically significant differences in cost effectiveness compared with either ceftazidime monotherapy or gentamicin/ureidopenicillin combination therapy. Sensitivity analyses revealed that monotherapy can be cost effective compared with combination therapy in many situations. CONCLUSION: There were no economic differences between the 3 regimens tested. Therefore drug cost should not be a deciding factor when choosing antibacterial therapy for the treatment of febrile episodes in adult patients with neutropenia.

Aminoglycosides↗

Repaglinide/troglitazone combination therapy: improved glycemic control in type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: This multicenter open-label clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of repaglinide/troglitazone combination therapy, repaglinide monotherapy, and troglitazone monotherapy in type 2 diabetes that had been inadequately controlled by sulfonylureas, acarbose, or metformin alone. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 256) who had inadequate glycemic control (HbA1c > or =7.0%) during previous monotherapy were randomly assigned to receive repaglinide (0.5-4.0 mg at meals), troglitazone (200-600 mg once daily), or a combination of repaglinide (1-4 mg at meals) and troglitazone (200-600 mg once daily). After a 4-6 week washout period, the trial assessed 22 weeks of treatment: 3 weeks (weeks 0-2) of forced titration, 11 weeks of fixed-dose treatment (weeks 3-13), and 8 weeks (weeks 14-21) of titration to maximum dose. Changes in HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) values were measured. RESULTS: The combination therapy showed a significant reduction in mean HbA1c values (-1.7%) that was greater than with either type of monotherapy Repaglinide monotherapy resulted in a reduction of HbA1c values that was significantly greater than troglitazone (-0.8 vs. -0.4%) (P < 0.05). Combination therapy was more effective in reducing FPG values (-80 mg/dl) than either repaglinide (-43 mg/dl) or troglitazone (-46 mg/dl) monotherapies. Adverse events were similar in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with repaglinide and troglitazone leads to better glycemic control than monotherapy with either agent alone. Repaglinide monotherapy was more effective in lowering HbA1c levels than troglitazone monotherapy Repaglinide/troglitazone combination therapy was effective and did not show unexpected adverse events.

Adult↗

Response to combination therapy of interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin in Hispanics with chronic hepatitis C.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the response rate of Hispanics with chronic hepatitis C to combination therapy of interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin and to assess its adverse events. BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus may lead to chronic infection and multiple complications. Response to combination therapy of interferon plus ribavirin has been studied in many populations. African Americans have been found to have a lower response rate than Caucasians. However, little data exist for Hispanics. METHODS: Hispanic patients from Puerto Rico with chronic hepatitis C were eligible for the study between November 1997 and February 2000. The Institutional Review Boards of the participating institutions approved the study. Written informed consents were obtained. Combination therapy was given for 48 weeks and patients were followed for 24 weeks after treatment. Analysis of response to therapy was performed in an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: The most frequent adverse event was anemia (89%), associated to ribavirin. Sustained response was 23% for naive patients, 45% for relapsers, and 8% for non-responders to previous interferon monotherapy (p < 0.001). Data to analyze response was not available in 27% of patients. Hispanic patients had a low response rate to combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Response rates to combination therapy for Hispanic naive and previously non-responder patients are lower than in other reported populations. This may be due to a high prevalence of genotype 1 in Puerto Rico, which is associated to poor response. The higher response rate of relapsers, similar to those reported previously, was expected since these patients showed a previous response to interferon monotherapy. Ethnic factors may play a role in the response to therapy and should be further studied to determine proper treatment strategies for this population.

Antiviral Agents↗

Cost effectiveness of combination therapy with pioglitazone for type 2 diabetes mellitus from a german statutory healthcare perspective.

BACKGROUND: Pioglitazone has been approved in Europe for oral combination therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Along with other agents of the thiazolidinedione class, it has a novel intracellular mechanism of action. Clinical trials with pioglitazone have confirmed a strong product profile in terms of control of blood glucose and lipids. However, the drug acquisition cost for pioglitazone is greater than standard medications for type 2 diabetes. Long-term data regarding the cost effectiveness of pioglitazone-based combination therapy are not available. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, using a decision analysis model, the cost effectiveness of pioglitazone-based combination therapy compared with relevant alternative medications for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Germany. METHODS: This study compared the clinical effects and costs of pioglitazone 30 mg added to metformin in patients who failed metformin monotherapy and pioglitazone added to a sulphonylurea in patients who failed sulphonylurea monotherapy, with the most relevant treatment alternatives. A published and validated Markov model was adapted to reflect the management of type 2 diabetes. This simulated the number of severe complications occurring and the mean life expectancy of a diabetic cohort, which was based on the overweight group of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study at year 6 of follow-up. Drug treatment costs, other costs for general management of type 2 diabetes and the costs of complications were combined to compute overall lifetime treatment costs from the perspective of the German statutory healthcare system in 2002. RESULTS: Combination therapy with pioglitazone/metformin was associated with a higher life expectancy (15.2 years) relative to sulphonylurea/metformin (14.9 years) or acarbose/metformin (14.7 years). Likewise, pioglitazone/sulphonylurea (15.5 years) was superior to metformin/sulphonylurea (14.9 years) and acarbose/sulphonylurea (14.8 years). Undiscounted incremental cost-effectiveness ratios in comparison to the next best strategy were euro20,002 per life-year gained (LYG) for pioglitazone/metformin versus sulphonylurea/metformin, and euro8707 per LYG for pioglitazone/sulphonylurea versus metformin/sulphonylurea. After discounting costs and life expectancy at 5% per year, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was euro47 636 per LYG for pioglitazone/metformin versus sulphonylurea/metformin, and euro19 745 per LYG for pioglitazone/sulphonylurea versus metformin/sulphonylurea. CONCLUSIONS: In this model, with its underlying assumptions and data, combination therapy with pioglitazone increased life expectancy in overweight type 2 diabetes patients at acceptable cost compared with other well established medications in Germany. These findings should be re-evaluated as soon as additional evidence becomes available from the currently ongoing long-term clinical and economic studies.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

Treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of Waldeyer's ring: radiotherapy versus chemotherapy versus combined therapy.

Treatment of stage IA non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) of Waldeyer's ring remains controversial, probably because of the small number of patients and the scarcity of controlled studies. Between 1981 and 1991, 316 patients with stage I NHL of Waldeyer's ring were randomised for treatment with radiotherapy alone (extended fields), 101 patients; combined chemotherapy with a regimen of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and prednisone) or CHOP-like (epirubicin instead of doxorubicin), 106 patients; and combined therapy (radiotherapy followed by the same combination chemotherapy), 109 patients. Median follow-up was 6.8 years. Complete response was achieved in 93, 87 and 97%, respectively. Relapses were least frequent in patients treated with combination therapy. The 5-year rate for failure-free survival was 48% for radiation therapy, 45% for the patients who were treated with chemotherapy, which was statistically significantly less than the 83% for patients treated with combined therapy (P < 0.001). Overall survival was also better in the combined therapy arm: 90%, statistically different to 58% for the patients treated with chemotherapy alone and 56% for patients treated with radiation therapy (P < 0.001). Toxicity was mild and late side-effects were not observed in any patients. From these results combined therapy should be considered as the best therapeutic approach in patients with localised NHL of Waldeyer's ring.

Adult↗

Gemfibrozil, nicotinic acid and combination therapy in patients with isolated hypoalphalipoproteinemia: a randomized, open-label, crossover study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of nicotinic acid (NA), gemfibrozil and combination therapy on the lipid profile of patients with clinical atherosclerotic disease and isolated hypoalphalipoproteinemia. BACKGROUND: Isolated hypoalphalipoproteinemia (low high density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C] alone) accounts for a significant percentage of patients with premature atherosclerosis. However, it remains unclear whether currently available pharmacotherapy has the ability to favorably affect the lipid profile and therefore potentially reduce clinical events. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with clinically well-defined atherosclerosis and isolated hypoalphalipoproteinemia were prospectively randomized to receive gemfibrozil, NA or combination therapy in an open-label, crossover design trial to assess the effects on serum lipids. Lipid profiles and other relevant laboratory variables were monitored while the patients were on and off pharmacologic lipid-modulating therapy. RESULTS: In those 14 patients able to tolerate all forms of pharmacotherapy, HDL-C of 0.89 +/- 0.17 mmol/liter (34.5 +/- 6.5 mg/dl) increased by 15%, to 1.02 +/- 0.18 mmol/liter (39.7 +/- 7.1 mg/dl), while taking gemfibrozil (1,200 mg/day); by 35%, to 1.20 +/- 0.21 mmol/liter (46.5 +/- 8.1 mg/dl), while taking NA (mean dose 2,250 mg/day); and by 45%, to 1.29 +/- 0.19 mmol/liter (50.0 +/- 7.5 mg/dl), while taking combination therapy of gemfibrozil plus NA (p < 0.001 for all interventions as compared with baseline/washout; p < 0.005 NA vs. gemfibrozil; p < 0.001 combination therapy vs. gemfibrozil alone; p = 0.088 combination therapy vs. NA alone). Statistically significant favorable alterations were also observed with low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), LDL-C/HDL-C, non-HDL-C/HDL-C, apolipoprotein (Apo) B and Apo B/Apo A1. CONCLUSIONS: In the majority of patients with clinical atherosclerotic disease and isolated hypoalphalipoproteinemia, pharmacologic therapy to raise HDL-C is not only feasible but is also effective with currently available agents, particularly when used in combination.

Adult↗

Safety and efficacy of lamivudine-zidovudine combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients. A randomized controlled comparison with zidovudine monotherapy. Lamivudine European HIV Working Group.

OBJECTIVE: To compare safety and efficacy of lamivudine-zidovudine combination therapy with zidovudine monotherapy in treating human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected, antiretroviral therapy-naive patients. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, multicenter, comparative trial of 129 patients throughout 24 weeks followed by 24 weeks of open-label lamivudine in combination with zidovudine. SETTING: Outpatients from 14 hospitals in Belgium, France, Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom were enrolled within 6 months. PATIENTS: HIV-1-positive, antiretroviral-naive ( < or = 4 weeks prior zidovudine use) patients aged atleast 18 years with CD4+ cell counts between 0.10 x 10(9)/L and 0.40 x 10(9)/L (100-400/microL). INTERVENTION: Patients received either 300 mg of lamivudine every 12 hours in combination with 200 mg of zidovudine every 8 hours for 24 weeks or zidovudine monotherapy for 24 weeks. All patients were then allowed to receive zidovudine in combination with open-label lamivudine (300 mg every 12 hours). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy was assessed by changes in CD4+ cell counts beta 2-microglobulin, neopterin, HIV-1 immune-complex dissociated (ICD) p24 antigenemia, and HIV-1 viral load. Safety was assessed by incidence of adverse clinical events and defined laboratory-measured toxic effects. RESULTS: Combination therapy showed superior treatment effects compared with monotherapy during the first 24 weeks as documented by changes in CD4+ cell counts (increase of 0.08 x 10(9)/L vs 0.02 x 10(9)/L; P < .001), ICDp24 (-88% vs -49%; P = .04), cellular viremia (-1.27 vs -0.20 log10 median tissue-culture infected dose [TCID50] per 10(6) peripheral blood mononuclear cells; P = .001), and viral load measured by HIV-1 RNA polymerase chain reaction using a Roche method (-1.33 vs -0.57 log10 copies/mL; P = .001) or an immune-capture method (-0.6 vs -0.14log10 copies/mL; P = .008). Observed changes were sustained to 48 weeks for patients continuing to receive combination therapy. Patients switching to receive combination therapy at week 24 showed improvements in CD4+ cell count and viral load to week 48. Mutation results suggested that mutations associated with zidovudine resistance may have developed more slowly over the first 24 weeks in patients receiving combination therapy. In contrast, mutations associated with lamivudine resistance appeared to develop rapidly, despite sustained antiviral treatment effect. However, the number of patients evaluated for genotypic changes was small, and confirmation of these results is needed in larger studies. No statistically significant differences in incidence or severity of clinically manifested or laboratory-measured toxic effects were noted between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of lamivudine and zidovudine results in a potent and sustained antiviral effect in antiretroviral-naive patients that is superior to that observed with zidovudine monotherapy.

Adult↗

[The combination therapy of amikacin and beta-lactam antibiotic in the severe bacterial infections (author's transl)].

The combination therapy of beta-lactam and aminoglycoside antibiotics is now evaluated to be very effective in severe infections. Amikacin, one of aminoglycoside antibiotics, has antibacterial activity to gentamicin resistant bacteria. Then we tried to use the combination therapy of amikacin and beta-lactams in 20 cases with severe bacterial infections, including 2 cases of bacteremia etc. Fifteen cases out of them failed to cure by previous antibiotics treatment. With a few exception, amikacin was administered daily 200 mg in 2 divided intramuscular injections. beta-Lactams were administered twice a day by intravenous drip infusion, but dose and kind of beta-lactams were decided by attending doctors. Clinical efficacy of this combination therapy was classified in 4 degrees: excellent, good, fair and poor. Clinical efficacy rate (excellent and good results) in all cases was 75%. This is equally effective, compared with the newly sold antibiotics. Elevation of serum GOT and GPT levels was seen in 2 cases in whom large amount of PCs was given. As a conclusion, it was indicated that the combination therapy of amikacin and beta-lactam in the regular dose was sufficiently effective and useful for the therapy of severe bacterial infections.

Adult↗

Risk factors for retinopathy associated with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin combination therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

AIM: To elucidate the frequency and risk factors for retinopathy in patients with chronic hepatitis C who are treated by interferon-ribavirin combination therapy. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed 73 patients with histologically confirmed chronic hepatitis C, who underwent combination therapy for 24 wk. Optic fundi were examined before, and 2, 4, 12 and 24 wk after the start of combination therapy. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (19%) developed retinopathy, which was initially diagnosed by the appearance of a cotton wool spot in 12 patients. Retinal hemorrhage was observed in 5 patients. No patient complained of visual disturbance. Retinopathy disappeared in 9 patients (64%) despite the continuation of combination therapy. However, retinopathy persisted in 5 patients with retinal hemorrhage. A comparison of the clinical background between the groups with and without retinopathy showed no significant differences in age, gender, viral genotype, RNA level, white blood cell count, platelet count, prothrombin time, complications by diabetes mellitus or hypertension, or pretreatment arteriosclerotic changes in the optic fundi. However, multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that complication by hypertension was observed with a high frequency in the group with retinopathy (P = 0.004, OR = 245.918, 95% CI = 5.6-10786.2). CONCLUSION: Retinopathy associated with combination therapy of interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin tends to develop in patients with hypertension.

Adult↗