Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ANTISEPSIS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

[Local antisepsis in infected total hip endoprosthesis].

Between 1991 and 1993, 34 infected total hip prostheses were treated with the topical antiseptic hexamethylenbiguanide (Lavasept) in addition to thorough débridement of infected and necrotic tissue and systemic antibiotic administration. In 4 cases (group 1) a contaminated hematoma was treated within the first 3 weeks after joint replacement. Soft tissue revision without removal of the prosthesis was performed in 6 cases (group 2). In 18 cases (group 3) a one-stage exchange of the infected prosthesis was done. In 6 cases (group 4), local and general conditions were so poor that the prosthesis was removed without replacement. The success rate was 100% in group 1, 20% in group 2, and 77% in group 3. In group 4, 1 patient died of respiratory problems 12 days after surgery while in 2 patients the infection healed uneventfully and in 1 patient healing was achieved after a second revision. An 81-year-old patient in poor general condition had an impressive improvement of his severe infection, although very minor drainage continued. Hexamethylenbiguanide has proven to be a useful supplement to thorough surgical revision. However, longer follow-up data are required.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Betadine for antisepsis of the conjunctival sac].

12.5% solution of betadine is used for conjunctival sac antiseptics. To estimate effectiveness of betadine in 50 eyes, bacteriological examination was performed before and after local betadine application. Betadine is effective against Staphylococcus. Peptococcaceae were cultured after betadine application, in 3 cases.

Anti-Infective Agents, Local↗
PubMed1975

Has medical history importance for surgeons?

Surgeons will do well to remember that the two most important contributions to the growth and extension of surgery came from two disciplines, not then regarded as the most innovative. Anesthesia came from dentistry, the work primarily of W.T.G. Morton of Boston; prophylactic surgical antisepsis originated with the obstetrician Semmelweis, who developed a scheme of prophylactic chemical antisepsis that still remains the core of surgical antisepsis. In the mid 1880's, largely as a result of the work of Chamberland and others of the Pasteur school, surgeons in France and Germany substituted thermal for chemical antisepsis, whenever applicable. Whereas Lister's influence was tremendous in fostering acceptance of antisepsis by surgeons, by the end of his professorial career he had begun his capitulation to prophylactic antisepsis, which was complete by 1896 to the very practices that Semmelweis had proved the value of almost five decades previously. These were 19th century innovations. The greatest boon to surgery's advance in this century has been control of cellulitic infections through chemotherapeutic agencies, the sulfonamides and antibiotics. The tremendous upsurge of interest in research at the end of World War II brought surgeons to a fuller realization of the significant part they could play in the advance of their discipline. Intimate alignment of surgeons with physiologists of the circulation begot intracardiac surgery, a significant innovation with consequences of tremendous import for greater medicine's advance. Today, surgeons attacking the problem of tissue transplantation are aligning themselves with biochemists, geneticists, immunologists, experimental pathologists, and pharmacologists in their broad approach to the phenomenon of allograft rejection. The great extension of vascular surgery since World War II has made jewelers of surgeons of small tubular structures. The technical phases of these demanding operative procedures have largely been overcome. Solution of the biologic rejection phenomenon is awaited eagerly by all investigators, a discovery that will greatly enhance predictable success of transfer of skin as well as of organs. When will surgery experience another great catalytic forward thrust like that achieved through anesthesia, prophylactic antisepsis, and the antibiotics? No discipline in medicine can exist alone without privation. For its continuing advancement, surgery is dependent upon close and intimate relationships with many other medical disciplines. Apart from the enlightenment provided by a searching examination of the origins of our surgical discipline, the earnest and persistent pursuer will discover a lively pleasure and satisfaction that accrues as a special dividend.

Amputation, Surgical↗
PubMed1997

Antiseptic effects at injection sites.

To our knowledge, there are no published papers detailing antisepsis for injection sites. In view of this, the efficacies of povidone-iodine (PVP-I) ethanol solution and chlorhexidine (CH) ethanol, the agents most commonly used for antisepsis of the operative field, were compared. Before and after the injection site was disinfected with either of these antiseptics, specimens of indigenous bacteria on the skin were collected by the cylinder scrub method, and the bacteria reduction rate and the reduction factor (RF) were determined to evaluate the efficacy of antisepsis. The bacteria reduction rate and RF value obtained for PVP-I ethanol were 95.1 +/- 11.2 and 2.1 +/- 0.9% and those for CH ethanol were 93.5 +/- 9.3 and 1.8 +/- 0.9%. Since there were individual differences in cell count before antisepsis, no significant difference was seen in bactericidal activity. However, slightly more favorable results were obtained with PVP-I ethanol. Although it is impossible to eradicate completely the indigenous microbes with currently available methods, it is considered important for the prevention of infection of the injection site to decrease bacterial counts as much as possible.

Anti-Infective Agents, Local↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Effect of antiseptic treatment of alveolar surgical wounds on bacterial growth on cotton suture threads].

The objective of this study was to evaluate bacterial growth on cotton suture. The efficiency of cetylpyridinium chloride (50%), hydrogen peroxide (3%) and chlorhexidine (0.12%) in antisepsis was investigated. For that, 20 patients who were submitted to extraction of impacted lower third molars were studied. Five days after extraction, samples were obtained from the oral and alveolar sides of the sutures, before and after antisepsis of the wounds, and were submitted to bacteriological analysis. Bacterial growth was observed in all examined samples. The number of streptococci decreased after antisepsis and there were no statistically significant differences between the methods of antisepsis used.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Hand-rubbing with an aqueous alcoholic solution vs traditional surgical hand-scrubbing and 30-day surgical site infection rates: a randomized equivalence study.

CONTEXT: Surgical site infections prolong hospital stays, are among the leading nosocomial causes of morbidity, and a source of excess medical costs. Clinical studies comparing the risk of nosocomial infection after different hand antisepsis protocols are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of hand-cleansing protocols in preventing surgical site infections during routine surgical practice. DESIGN: Randomized equivalence trial. SETTING: Six surgical services from teaching and nonteaching hospitals in France. PATIENTS: A total of 4387 consecutive patients who underwent clean and clean-contaminated surgery between January 1, 2000, and May 1, 2001. INTERVENTIONS: Surgical services used 2 hand-cleansing methods alternately every other month: a hand-rubbing protocol with 75% aqueous alcoholic solution containing propanol-1, propanol-2, and mecetronium etilsulfate; and a hand-scrubbing protocol with antiseptic preparation containing 4% povidone iodine or 4% chlorhexidine gluconate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thirty-day surgical site infection rates were the primary end point; operating department teams' tolerance of and compliance with hand antisepsis were secondary end points. RESULTS: The 2 protocols were comparable in regard to surgical site infection risk factors. Surgical site infection rates were 55 of 2252 (2.44%) in the hand-rubbing protocol and 53 of 2135 (2.48%) in the hand-scrubbing protocol, for a difference of 0.04% (95% confidence interval, -0.88% to 0.96%). Based on subsets of personnel, compliance with the recommended duration of hand antisepsis was better in the hand-rubbing protocol of the study compared with the hand-scrubbing protocol (44% vs 28%, respectively; P =.008), as was tolerance, with less skin dryness and less skin irritation after aqueous solution use. CONCLUSIONS: Hand-rubbing with aqueous alcoholic solution, preceded by a 1-minute nonantiseptic hand wash before each surgeon's first procedure of the day and before any other procedure if the hands were soiled, was as effective as traditional hand-scrubbing with antiseptic soap in preventing surgical site infections. The hand-rubbing protocol was better tolerated by the surgical teams and improved compliance with hygiene guidelines. Hand-rubbing with liquid aqueous alcoholic solution can thus be safely used as an alternative to traditional surgical hand-scrubbing.

Anti-Infective Agents, Local↗
PubMed2006

Prospective study to determine the penetration of iodide into the anterior chamber following preoperative application of topical 1.25% povidone-iodine.

BACKGROUND: Povidone-iodine is currently the agent of choice for pre-operative antisepsis in ophthalmology. Due to experimental and analytical constraints, iodine absorption into the anterior chamber (AC) has not yet been studied. However, knowledge of the details of iodine transfer into the aqueous humor (AH) is critical for risk assessment of local and/or systemic side effects METHODS: Following a 2-min antisepsis with 1.25% povidone-iodine, the AC of eligible cataract patients was penetrated with a 26-gauge cannula prior to any other intraocular manipulation. To distinguish between the iodine absorbed into the AC and that remaining in the hypodermic delivery syringe, we studied three different groups of specimens: (i) AH from the AC (n=19); (ii) Ringer's solution aspirated through the cannula after penetration into and immediate withdrawal from the AC without subsequent decontamination (n=8); and (iii) Ringer's solution aspirated through the cannula after penetration into and immediate withdrawal from the AC, and subsequent decontamination of its outer surface (n=5). Patients with pre-operative epithelial defects were excluded from the study. To measure iodine absorption, iodide levels in samples were determined chromatographically (ion-pair chromatography) and electrochemically (gold electrode). RESULTS: There was no difference (P=0.815) between detectable amounts of iodide in groups I and II (median: 24.0 microg/dl and 28.9 microg/dl, respectively). Only group III (median: 5.2 microg/dl) showed a statistically significant lower level of iodide than did groups I or II (P=0.019 and P=0.011, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A healthy ocular surface behaves as a barrier to the penetration of iodine into the AC. Any detectable iodide in the AH after antisepsis should therefore be considered harmless.

Absorption↗
PubMed1997

Antiseptic effect of povidone-iodine solution on abdominal skin during surgery and on thyroid-gland-related substances.

No definite guidelines have been published concerning the suitable exposure time and frequency of skin antisepsis of the operative field. In the present study, the antiseptic effect of a single use (single-application group) of 10% povidoneiodine solution for skin antisepsis was compared with its triple use (triple-application group). The exposure time was 2 min for both groups. Moreover, the effects on blood levels of total iodine and thyroid-gland-related substances were evaluated. High antiseptic efficacy was obtained in both groups, indicating that our antiseptic method to disinfect the operative field is effective. Slightly better results were obtained from the triple-application group, although the difference was not statistically significant. Blood levels of total iodine and thyroid-gland-related substances remained within the normal range in all cases. However, in cases receiving a large amount of 10% povidone-iodine solution a transient elevation in blood total iodine was observed. Thus, the 10% povidone-iodine solution is considered to be safe and effective for skin antisepsis of the operative field when applied repeatedly in a small amount per dose with an exposure time of about 2 min.

Abdomen↗
PubMed1999

Bacterial contamination of the hands of hospital staff during routine patient care.

BACKGROUND: Cross-transmission of microorganisms by the hands of health care workers is considered the main route of spread of nosocomial infections. OBJECTIVE: To study the process of bacterial contamination of health care workers' hands during routine patient care in a large teaching hospital. METHODS: Structured observations of 417 episodes of care were conducted by trained external observers (S.T. and V.S.). Each observation period started after a hand-cleansing procedure and ended when the health care worker proceeded to clean his or her hands or at the end of a coherent episode of care. At the end of each period of observation, an imprint of the 5 fingertips of the dominant hand was taken and bacterial colony counts were quantified. Regression methods were used to model the intensity of bacterial contamination as a function of method of hand cleansing, use of gloves during patient care, duration and type of care, and hospital ward. RESULTS: Bacterial contamination increased linearly with time on ungloved hands during patient care (average, 16 colony-forming units [CFUs] per minute; 95% confidence interval, 11-21 CFUs per minute). Patient care activities independently (P<.05 for all) associated with higher contamination levels were direct patient contact, respiratory care, handling of body fluid secretions, and rupture in the sequence of patient care. Contamination levels varied with hospital location; the medical rehabilitation ward had higher levels (49 CFUs; P=.03) than did other wards. Finally, simple hand washing before patient care, without hand antisepsis, was also associated with higher colony counts (52 CFUs; P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: The duration and type of patient care affect hand contamination. Furthermore, because hand antisepsis was superior to hand washing, intervention trials should explore the role of systematic hand antisepsis as a cornerstone of infection control to reduce cross-transmission in hospitals.

Bacteria↗
PubMed2004

Preoperative skin antiseptics for preventing surgical wound infections after clean surgery.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 15% of elective surgery patients and 30% of patients receiving contaminated or dirty surgery are estimated to develop post-operative wound infections. The costs of surgical wound infection can be considerable in financial as well as social terms. Preoperative skin antisepsis is performed to reduce the risk of post-operative wound infections by removing soil and transient organisms from the skin. Antiseptics are thought to be both toxic to bacteria and aid their mechanical removal. The effectiveness of preoperative skin preparation is thought to be dependent on both the antiseptic used and the method of application, however it is unclear whether preoperative skin antisepsis actually reduces post-operative wound infection and if so which antiseptic is most effective. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether preoperative skin antisepsis reduces post-operative surgical wound infection. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Trials Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in April 2004. In addition we handsearched journals, conference proceedings and bibliographies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of preoperative skin antiseptics applied immediately prior to incision in clean surgery. There were no restrictions based on language, date or publication status. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three reviewers independently undertook data extraction and assessment of study quality. Pooling was inappropriate and trials are discussed in a narrative review. MAIN RESULTS: We identified six eligible RCTs evaluating preoperative antiseptics. There was significant heterogeneity in the comparisons and the results could not be pooled. In one study, infection rates were significantly lower when skin was prepared using chlorhexidine compared with iodine. There was no evidence of a benefit in four trials associated with the use of iodophor impregnated drapes. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient research examining the effects of preoperative skin antiseptics to allow conclusions to be drawn regarding their effects on post-operative surgical wound infections. Further research is needed.

Anti-Infective Agents, Local↗
PubMed1998

[Explant test with skin and peritoneum of the neonatal rat as a predictive test of tolerance of local anti-infective agents in wounds and body cavities].

In vitro culture of peritoneal explants of neonatal rats after previous application of agents simulating wound antisepsis is a sensitive screening method for the determination of the tissue compatibility of local wound antiinfectives. Two test models are differentiated: (1) separated peritoneal explants as a model for chronic or deep wounds and (2) peritoneum in situ in the experimental animal with subsequent extraction and cultivation of the explants. Considering the present state of knowledge the following conclusions can be drawn regarding antisepsis of wounds: Lavasept (0.1%) may be classified as the agent of choice for deep and chronic wounds, for drip-suck irrigation and for antiinfective lavage of body cavities inclusively for peritoneal lavage (0.05%). Taurolidin is antiseptically effective in long term application (> 6 h), and because of its antitoxic effect as well as lack of cytotoxicity it is especially suitable for peritoneal lavage. Betaisodona solution is very well suited for superficial contaminated wounds and can be used in a dilution of 1:10 for short-term rinsing of deep wounds, including body cavities but not for peritoneal lavage. Ethanol causes no inhibition of explant growth and therefore retains its importance in wound antisepsis.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2002

An outbreak of bloodstream infections in an outpatient hemodialysis center.

OBJECTIVES: Investigate and control an increase in bloodstream infections (BSIs) in an outpatient hemodialysis center. PATIENTS AND DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted for patients receiving dialysis at the center from February 2000 to April 2001. A case-control study compared microbiological data for all BSIs that occurred during the study period with those for BSIs that occurred during a baseline period January 1999 to January 2000). BSI rates before and after a 1-month intervention (May 2001) were assessed. A case was defined as a new BSI during the study period. RESULTS: The outbreak was polymicrobial, with approximately 30 species. The baseline BSI rate was 0.7 per 100 patient-months. From February 2000 to April 2001, the BSI rate increased to 4.2 per 100 patient-months. Overall, 75% of the BSIs were associated with central venous catheters (CVCs), but CVC use did not fully explain the increase in BSIs. In January 2000, when the center changed ownership, prepackaged CVC dressing kits and biweekly infection control monitoring were discontinued. Beginning in May 2001, staff were educated on CVC care, chlorhexidine replaced povidone-iodine for cutaneous antisepsis, gauze replaced transparent dressings, antimicrobial ointments containing polyethylene glycol at CVC exit sites were discontinued, and patients with CVCs were educated on cutaneous hygiene. After the intervention period, by October 2001, rates decreased to less than 1 BSI per 100 patient-months. CONCLUSIONS: Proper cutaneous antisepsis and access site care is crucial in preventing BSIs in patients receiving hemodialysis. Infection control programs, staff and patient education, and use of optimal antisepsis agents or prepackaged kits are useful toward this end.

Adult↗
PubMed1975

[The history of wound dressings (author's transl)].

The introduction of antisepsis and asepsis brought about decisive changes in the dressing of wounds. For thousands of years, dressing material had been regarded as protection for wounds, absorbent material, or a base for healing substances, while healing per secundam intentionem by the production of "pus laudabile" was the general rule. With the advent of antisepsis, dressings became a type of medication, healing the wounds per primam intentionem. Different materials have been used over the years, but the most important steps in the development of new dressings were made in the nineteenth century, with the introduction of a degreased cotton and of medicated plasters.

Anti-Infective Agents, Local↗