Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ANESTHETICS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources

Molecular mechanisms of nerve block by local anesthetics.

Local anesthetics block nerve conduction by preventing the increase in membrane permeability to sodium ions that normally leads to a nerve impulse. Among anesthetics containing tertiary amine groups, the cationic, protonated form appears to be more active than the neutral form. However, the neutral forms, as well as uncharged molecules like benzocaine and the aliphatic alcohols, also depress sodium permeability. Studies of single myelinated nerves and squid axons show no direct interaction between calcium ions and local anesthetics, thus disproving theories based on competition between these two agents. Likewise, hypotheses attributing local anesthesia to changes in electrical potentials at the membrane-water interface are disproven by the demonstrated potencies of electrically uncharged anesthetics. Hypotheses that propose that local anesthetics act by expanding the nerve membrane and causing a change in protein conformation that blocks sodium permeability are vague in conception and difficult to test experimentally. Evidence from voltage-clamp studies of single nerve fibers indicates that anesthetic molecules interact with the sodium channels directly, from the inner side of the nerve membrane. Anesthetics bind within sodium channels which have opened during membrane depolarization, preventing the normal sodium ion flux. Anesthetic molecules can dissociate from open channels, but not from channels that remain closed when the nerve is kept at rest. The "gating" properties that regulate the opening and closing of sodium channels are reversibly modified during anesthesia. Specifically, the inactivation function responds more slowly and requires more negative membrane potential changes to reach the same values as in unanesthetized nerves. A second, slow inactivation is observed following external application of tertiary amine anesthetics. The selective binding of anesthetics to open sodium channels provides a simple explanation for Wedenski inhibition, in which the block increases with the frequency of nerve impulses. When impulses occur at higher frequencies more sodium channels are open over a period of time comparable to the time necessary for the anesthetic binding reaction, thus more channels are blocked. In addition the changes of the inactivation function result in a longer refractory period and, thus, a decrease of impulse height at higher frequencies. Charged anesthetic molecules may bind in the pore of the sodium channel. Their binding can be modulated by the electrical field in the membrane. The channel has a higher affinity for larger anesthetic molecules, but this may result from their greater hydrophobicity as well as from their size. The binding site favors molecules that contain more polar linkages between the amine group and the aromatic residue. Binding of amine anesthetics is weakly stereospecific and, surprisingly, shows no absolute requirement for the terminal alkyl ammonium moiety present in most local anesthetics...

Action Potentials↗

Comparing the costs of inhaled anesthetics.

BACKGROUND: The immediate cost of an inhaled anesthetic results from an interplay between four factors: (1) the cost per milliliter of liquid anesthetic, (2) the volume of vapor that results from each milliliter of liquid, (3) the effective potency of the anesthetic (what concentration must be delivered from a vaporizer to provide a clinically appropriate level of anesthesia), and (4) the background flow of the gases that is chosen. A background flow that supplies only the gases/vapors required (taken up) by the patient (a "closed circuit") produces the least cost but also the least control of anesthetic level, whereas a high flow prevents rebreathing (a non-rebreathing system) but produces the greatest cost and control. We define greater "control" as a smaller ratio of delivered to alveolar concentrations. A lower solubility of an anesthetic accords the same level of control at a lower background flow rate than is achieved at a higher background flow rate with a more soluble anesthetic. Thus, a poorly soluble anesthetic may be used with a lower background flow rate than a more soluble anesthetic and may offer greater control and/or decreased cost. METHODS: This report presents a method of determining the cost of inhaled anesthetic use. As an example, the cost of delivering a desflurane anesthetic is compared with that of delivering an isoflurane anesthetic, assuming both provide an alveolar concentration of 1 MAC. The comparison is based on the pharmacokinetic differences of the two anesthetics: taking into account that for a given therapeutic anesthetic concentration (MAC), for desflurane a lower flow rate of background gas is needed to produce similar control (relationship between delivered and alveolar gases) than is needed for isoflurane. RESULTS: The analysis demonstrates that the relative cost of administering the newer and less soluble anesthetic, desflurane, can be less than, greater than, or the same as the cost of administering isoflurane, depending on the background gas inflow rate selected. CONCLUSION: The manner in which inhaled anesthetics are used and their kinetic differences are important determinants of relative cost.

Administration, Inhalation↗

The gamma subunit determines whether anesthetic-induced leftward shift is altered by a mutation at alpha1S270 in alpha1beta2gamma2L GABA(A) receptors.

BACKGROUND: A major action of volatile anesthetics is enhancement of gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor type A (GABA(A)R) currents. In recombinant GABA(A)Rs consisting of several subunit mixtures, mutating the alpha1 subunit serine at position 270 to isoleucine [alpha1(S270I)] was reported to eliminate anesthetic-induced enhancement at low GABA concentrations. In the absence of studies at high GABA concentrations, it remains unclear whether alpha1(S270I) affects enhancement versus inhibition by volatile anesthetics. Furthermore, the majority of GABA(A)Rs in mammalian brain are thought to consist of alpha1, beta2, and gamma2 subunits, and the alpha1(S270I) mutation has not been studied in the context of this combination. METHODS: Recombinant GABA(A)Rs composed of alpha1beta2 or alpha1beta2gamma2L subunit mixtures were studied electrophysiologically in whole Xenopus oocytes in the voltage clamp configuration. Currents elicited by GABA (0.03 microM to 1 mM) were measured in the absence and presence of isoflurane or halothane. Anesthetic effects on GABA concentration responses were evaluated for individual oocytes. RESULTS: In wild-type alpha1beta2gamma2L GABA(A), anesthetics at approximately 2 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) shifted GABA concentration response curves to the left approximately threefold, decreased the Hill coefficient, and enhanced currents at all GABA concentrations. The alpha1(S270I) mutation itself rendered the GABA(A)R more sensitive to GABA and reduced the Hill coefficient. At low GABA concentrations (EC5), anesthetic enhancement of peak current was much smaller in alpha1(S270I)beta2gamma2L versus wild-type channels. Paradoxically, the leftward shift of the whole GABA concentration-response relation by anesthetics was the same in both mutant and wild-type channels. At high GABA concentrations, volatile anesthetics reduced currents in alpha1(S270I)beta2gammaL GABA(A)Rs. In parallel studies on alpha1beta2 (gamma-less) GABA(A)Rs, anesthetic-induced leftward shifts in wild-type receptors were more than eightfold at 2 MAC, and the alpha1(S270I) mutation nearly eliminated anesthetic-induced leftward shift. CONCLUSIONS: The results support a role for alpha1S270 in alpha1beta2gamma2L GABA(A)R gating and sensitivity to inhibition by volatile anesthetics. The alpha1S270 locus also modulates anesthetic enhancement in alpha1beta2 GABA(A)R. The presence of the gamma2L subunit reduces anesthetic-induced left shift of wild-type GABA(A)R and nullifies the impact of the alpha1(S2701) mutation on anesthetic modulation. Thus, the gamma2L subunit plays a significant role in GABA(A)R modulation by volatile anesthetic compounds.

Amino Acid Substitution↗

Membrane expansion and inhalation anesthetics. Mean excess volume hypothesis.

High-precision solution densimetry was used to determine volume parameters for the interaction of inhalation anesthetics with water, nonpolar solvent, and phospholipid vesicles. The precision of the densimeter is mainly limited by the constancy of the temperature during measurement. Therefore, temperature stability was maintained within +/- 0.0005 degrees and monitored by a microprocessor-controlled Thermistor thermometer with 0.0001 degrees resolution. All values were obtained at 25 degrees. Because volatile anesthetics in liquid form usually contain water, they were purified by passage through activated aluminum oxide columns. The molal volumes of dried preparations at the pure liquid states were: halothane, 106.3(3); isoflurane, 123.6(6); and enflurane, 121.9(9) cm3 X mole-1 at 298.150 degrees K. The mean molal excess volumes of anesthetic-water mixtures were negative at dilute anesthetic concentrations in water and positive at dilute water concentrations in liquid anesthetics. These values were dependent on the mole fractions of each component and showed a minimum in the water-rich region and a maximum in the anesthetic-rich region. In water, the partial molal volumes were halothane 93.7, isoflurane 103.4, and enflurane 98.6 cm3 X mole-1 at infinite dilution, and increased as the anesthetic concentration was increased. The partial molal volumes of water in liquid anesthetics were in halothane 21.7, isoflurane 21.0, and enflurane 20.5 cm3 X mole-1 at infinite dilution, and decreased as the anesthetic concentration was decreased. The mean excess volumes of the anesthetic-decane mixture were positive in the entire mixing range. The partial molal volumes of anesthetics in n-decane at infinite dilution were halothane 114.9, isoflurane 135.3, and enflurane 135.2 cm3 X mole-1. The mean specific excess volumes of the mixture of anesthetics and dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine vesicle suspension showed positive values. The partial molal volume was not evaluated because of the theoretical difficulty in estimating it in a dispersed two-phase system. Because the mean excess volume of anesthetics dissolved in water is always negative and that incorporated into phospholipid suspension is positive, anesthetics expand the total volume of the model membrane system when translocated from water to the membrane. Anesthesia occurs when the mean excess volume of the total system exceeds a limiting value, and the bulk membrane size is irrelevant. Although the present result in no way disclaims alternative hypotheses, it demonstrates that the pressure reversal of anesthesia can be explained without assuming any specific receptors for these anesthetics.

Anesthesia, Inhalation↗

Volatile anesthetic additivity and specificity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: implications for yeast as a model system to study mechanisms of anestheitc action.

BACKGROUND: In animals, combinations of volatile anesthetics are additive for inducing anesthesia. Furthermore, although there is a correlation between lipophilicity and anesthetic potency, not all volatile lipophilic compounds are anesthetic. Previously the authors demonstrated the effects of volatile anesthetics on the eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast). To further relate anesthetic action in this organism to mammals, anesthetic additivity and effects of volatile, lipophilic nonanesthetics were studied. In addition, yeast pleiotropic drug-resistance (Pdr) mutants, which confer resistance to various lipophilic compounds, were tested to determine if they are involved in anesthetic response. METHODS: Yeast strains were grown to saturation in liquid culture, diluted, plated on various solid media, incubated, and scored for growth. RESULTS: Combinations of volatile anesthetics inhibit growth of wild-type (Zzz+) but not anesthetic-resistant (Zzz-) strains when additive concentrations equal 1 minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Two volatile, lipophilic compounds that are nonanesthetic in mammals do not inhibit yeast growth. Zzz- mutants remain sensitive to drugs used to identify yeast PDR genes. Conversely Pdr strains, which are resistant to various lipophilic compounds, remain sensitive to volatile anesthetics. CONCLUSIONS: Yeast growth is inhibited in an additive manner by volatile anesthetics. Volatile, lipophilic compounds devoid of anesthetic activity in mammals do not inhibit yeast growth. Zzz- mutants appear to be specifically resistant to volatile anesthetics and distinct from known Pdr mutants. These results suggest that volatile anesthetics behave in a parallel manner in yeast and mammals, making yeast a useful model to investigate the molecular effects of these compounds in living cells.

Anesthetics, Inhalation↗

General anesthetics potentiate gamma-aminobutyric acid actions on gamma-aminobutyric acidA receptors expressed by Xenopus oocytes: lack of involvement of intracellular calcium.

Potentiation of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABAA) receptor-gated Cl- channel response has been suggested to be a primary action of some anesthetic agents. We asked whether the GABAA receptor is a target site common for general anesthetics that are chemically and structurally diverse. This hypothesis was tested in Xenopus oocytes expressing mouse cortical mRNA, and GABA-activated Cl- currents were measured using two-electrode voltage clamping. General anesthetics, including inhalational (halothane, diethylether, enflurane and isoflurane), i.v. (3 alpha-hydroxy-5 alpha-dihydroprogesterone, ketamine and propofol) and alcohol (pentanol) anesthetics, enhanced GABA-induced currents by 56 to 1089% at concentrations that were clinically relevant. The results suggest that potentiation of the GABAA receptor/channel response may be a common action for anesthetic agents. Moreover, anesthetic effects were dependent on GABA concentrations; the enhancement was marked with low GABA concentrations and was exponentially decreased as the GABA concentration increased. Also, anesthetic effects were dependent on anesthetic concentrations. The apparent EC50 of halothane was found to be similar to the anesthetic ED50. We also investigated the role of intracellular Ca++ in mediating anesthetic enhancement of the GABA current. We found that intracellular injection of the Ca++ chelator, EGTA, did not change the enhancement by anesthetics. In addition, these anesthetics alone did not produce significant currents, suggesting that the Ca(++)-dependent Cl- current was not activated by these anesthetics per se. Thus, we found that diverse anesthetics potentiate GABA-induced Cl- currents, but this action is not mediated by a release of intracellular Ca++.

20-alpha-Dihydroprogesterone↗

Exposure of postoperative nurses to exhaled anesthetic gases.

UNLABELLED: The National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has established recommended exposure limits of 25 parts per million (ppm) as a time-weighted average for nitrous oxide and a ceiling of 2 ppm for volatile anesthetics. We quantified exposure of postanesthetic nurses to exhaled anesthetic gases. This study was conducted in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) of a medium-sized hospital. PACU air exchanges averaged 8 vol/h; however, much of this air was recirculated. We evaluated 50 adults anesthetized with either isoflurane (n = 19) or desflurane (n = 31). Roughly half the patients were tracheally extubated in the operating room, whereas the others were extubated just after admission to the PACU. Exhaled anesthetic gases were sampled through a 20-m hose attached to the participating nurses' shoulders (breathing zone). We also evaluated nursing exposure to exhaled anesthetic gases during recovery of 15 patients who had been anesthetized with nitrous oxide. Exposure was quantified with lapel dosimeters. Anesthetic and recovery durations were each approximately 1 h, with most patients being tracheally extubated in the PACU. Breathing-zone anesthetic concentrations in the patients given isoflurane exceeded NIOSH recommendations in 37% of the patients, representing 12% of recovery time. Breathing-zone anesthetic concentrations in the patients given desflurane, however, exceeded NIOSH limits in 87% of the patients, representing 49% of recovery time. Altogether, noncompliant episodes were detected in 68% of these patients, representing 35% of the entire recovery duration. Breathing-zone anesthetic concentrations in the patients given nitrous oxide exceeded NIOSH limits in 53% of the patients. Our data suggest that postoperative nurses' exposure to exhaled anesthetic gases exceeds NIOSH limits under some circumstances. IMPLICATIONS: Some epidemiological evidence suggests that exposure to waste anesthetic gases may be associated with reproductive toxicity. Accordingly, the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health has established recommended exposure limits for nitrous oxide and volatile anesthetics. Our data suggest that exposure of healthcare personnel may exceed recommended levels in poorly ventilated postanesthesia care units.

Air Pollutants, Occupational↗

Differential membrane effects of general and local anesthetics.

The authors studied the effects of varying Na+ and Ca++ concentrations and of replacing H2O with D2O in Ringer's solution upon the actions of general and local anesthetics on isolated frog sciatic nerves. This experimental model was used to study whether general anesthetics affect excitable membranes in a manner similar to that of typical membrane stabilizers (local anesthetics). Procaine (2.5-7.5 mM), halothane (9, 18, and 36 mM), enflurane (8 mM), and ketamine (0.15 and 0.73 mM) raised threshold and lowered spike amplitude, and their effects were facilitated by reducing Na+ concentration in the Ringer's solution. The local anesthetic effects of procaine (2.5-7.5 mM) and ketamine (0.73 mM) were antagonized by Ca++, while the axonal depressant effect of halothane was facilitated by increasing Ca++ concentration in the Ringer's solution, indicating a different mode of action. General anesthetics also differed from local anesthetics in their interaction with water: replacement by D2O of H2O in the Ringer's solution selectively increased the axonal depressant effects of halothane and enflurane but not those of ketamine or procaine. Since D2O differs from H2O in its greater ice-likeness, these results are consistent with the view that general anesthetics stabilize excitable membranes via stabilization of the water-biopolymer lattice, as predicted by the hydrate-microcrystal theory of anesthesia. In contrast, local anesthetics may stabilize excitable tissues by binding to the same fixed negative charges of the membrane to which Ca++ is normally bound. (Key words: Theories of anesthesia, hydrate-microcrystal; Nerve, mode of action of anesthetics; Anesthetics, volatile, halothane; Anesthetics, volatile, enflurane; Anesthetics, local, procaine; Anesthetics, intravenous, ketamine.)

Anesthesia, General↗

The effects of general anesthetics on norepinephrine release from isolated rat cortical nerve terminals.

UNLABELLED: Intravenous and volatile general anesthetics inhibit norepinephrine (NE) release from sympathetic neurons and other neurosecretory cells. However, the actions of general anesthetics on NE release from central nervous system (CNS) neurons are unclear. We investigated the effects of representative IV and volatile anesthetics on [(3)H]NE release from isolated rat cortical nerve terminals (synaptosomes). Purified synaptosomes prepared from rat cerebral cortex were preloaded with [(3)H]NE and superfused with buffer containing pargyline (a monoamine oxidase inhibitor) and ascorbic acid (an antioxidant). Basal (spontaneous) and stimulus-evoked [(3)H]NE release was evaluated in the superfusate in the absence or presence of various anesthetics. Depolarization with increased concentrations of KCl (15-20 mM) or 4-aminopyridine (0.5-1.0 mM) evoked concentration- and Ca(2+)-dependent increases in [(3)H]NE release from rat cortical synaptosomes. The IV anesthetics etomidate (5-40 microM), ketamine (5-30 microM), or pentobarbital (25-100 microM) did not affect basal or stimulus-evoked [(3)H]NE release. Propofol (5-40 microM) increased basal [(3)H]NE release and, at larger concentrations, reduced stimulus-evoked release. The volatile anesthetic halothane (0.15-0.70 mM) increased basal [(3)H]NE release, but did not affect stimulus-evoked release. These findings demonstrate drug-specific stimulation of basal NE release. Noradrenergic transmission may represent a presynaptic target for selected general anesthetics in the CNS. Given the contrasting effects of general anesthetics on the release of other CNS transmitters, the presynaptic actions of general anesthetics are both drug- and transmitter-specific. IMPLICATIONS: General anesthetics affect synaptic transmission both by altering neurotransmitter release and by modulating postsynaptic responses to transmitter. Anesthetics exert both drug-specific and transmitter-specific effects on transmitter release: therapeutic concentrations of some anesthetics stimulate basal, but not evoked, norepinephrine release, in contrast to evoked glutamate release, which is inhibited.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗

Antagonism between high pressure and anesthetics in the thermal phase-transition of dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine bilayer.

The antagonizing action of hydrostatic pressure against anesthesia is well known. The present study was undertaken to quantitate the effects of hydrostatic pressure and anesthetics upon the phase-transition temperature of dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine vesicles. The drugs used to anesthetize the phospholipid vesicles included an inhalation anesthetic, halothane, a dissociable local anesthetic, lidocaine and an undissociable local anesthetic, benzyl alcohol. All anesthetics decreased the phase-transition temperature dose-dependently. In the case of lidocaine, the depression was pH dependent and only uncharged molecules were effective. The application of hydrostatic pressure increased the phase-transition temperature both in the presence and the absence of anesthetics. The temperature-pressure relationship was linear over the entire pressure range studied up to 340 bars. Through the use of Clapeyron-Clausius equation, the volume change accompanying the phase-transition of the membrane was calculated to be 27.0 cm3/mol. Although the anesthetics decreased the phase-transition temperature, the molar volume change accompanying the phase-transition was not altered. The anesthetics displaced the temperature-pressure lines parallel to each other. The mole fraction of the anesthetics in the liquid crystalline membrane, calculated from the van't Hoff equation, was independent of pressure. This implies that pressure does not displace the anesthetics from the liquid membrane, and the partition of these agents remains constant. The volume change of the anesthetized phospholipid membranes is entirely dependent upon the phase-transition and not on the space occupied by the anesthetics.

Anesthetics↗

Adsorption of local anesthetics on phospholipid membranes.

In order to elucidate various types of adsorption modes of local anesthetics in membranes, a study of local anesthetic adsorption on lipid membranes was made by measuring electrophoretic mobility of phospholipid vesicles in the presence of local anesthetics of various concentrations in the vesicle suspension solution. The amounts of local anesthetics to be adsorbed on the membrane surface were deduced from the electrophoretic mobility of a phosphatidylcholine vesicle at various concentrations of the cationic form of local anesthetics. The order of surface adsorption of local anesthetic was dibucaine greater than tetracaine greater than procaine. A surface partition coefficient, Ks = 1/ACs, was introduced, where A is the membrane surface area per local anesthetic molecule adsorbed and Cs the surface concentration of local anesthetics. The amounts of local anesthetic adsorbed on phosphatidylserine membrane were much greater than that of the phosphatidylcholine membrane. It was deduced that the major factor for this large adsorption was due to the enhancement of cationic forms of local anesthetic concentrations at the charged membrane surface. Divalent cations inhibited such surface adsorption of local anesthetics by reducing surface concentrations of local anesthetics where the surface potential of the negatively charged membrane surface was influenced by the presence of divalent cations in the solution as well as by the reduction of fixed surface charges due to divalent cation binding. Some association modes of local anesthetics on nerve membranes are discussed with the results obtained in the above adsorption study.

Adsorption↗

Polyhalogenated methyl ethyl ethers: solubilities and anesthetic properties.

UNLABELLED: The several potent inhaled anesthetics released for clinical use in the past four decades have been halogenated ethers, and, with one exception, methyl ethyl ethers. In the present report, we detail some structural and physical properties associated with anesthetic potency in 27 polyhalogenated methyl ethyl ethers. We obtained new data for 22 compounds. We used response/nonresponse of rats to electrical stimulation of the tail as the anesthetic end point (i.e., we measured the minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration [MAC]). For compounds that did not produce anesthesia when given alone (they only produced excitation/convulsions), we studied MAC by additivity studies with desflurane. We obtained MAC values for 20 of 22 of the studied ethers, which gave products of MAC x oil/gas partition coefficient ranging from 1.27 to 18.8 atm, compared with a product of 1.82+/-0.56 atm for conventional inhaled anesthetics. Despite solubilities in olive oil and application of partial pressures predicted by the Meyer-Overton hypothesis to provide anesthesia, 2 of 22 ethers (CCIF2OCCIFCF3 and CCIF2OCF2CClF2) had no anesthetic (immobilizing) effect when given alone, did not decrease the anesthetic requirement for desflurane, and had excitatory properties when administered alone. As with other inhaled anesthetics, anesthetic potency seemed to correlate with both polar and nonpolar properties. These ethers, representing structural analogs of currently used clinical volatile anesthetics, may be useful in identifying and understanding the mechanisms by which inhaled anesthetics act. IMPLICATIONS: The several potent, inhaled, polyhalogenated methyl ethyl ether anesthetics released for clinical use in the past four decades seem to have specific useful characteristics that set them apart from other methyl ethyl ethers. Properties of this class of compounds have implications for the future development of anesthetics and the mechanisms by which they act.

Anesthetics, Inhalation↗

Different effects of volatile anesthetics and polyhalogenated alkanes on depolarization-evoked glutamate release in rat cortical brain slices.

UNLABELLED: Anesthetics cause a reduction in excitatory neurotransmission that may be important in the mechanisms of in vivo anesthetic action. Because glutamate is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in mammalian brain, evaluation of anesthetic effects on induced glutamate release is relevant for studying this potential mechanism of anesthetic action. In the present study, we compared the effects of anesthetics and nonanesthetics (halogenated alkanes that disobey the Meyer-Overton hypothesis) on depolarization-evoked glutamate release. Glutamate released from rat cortical brain slices after chemically induced depolarization (50 mM KCl) was measured continuously using an enzymatic fluorescence assay. The effects of the volatile anesthetics isoflurane and enflurane were compared with the effects of the transitional compound 1,1,2-trichlorotrifluoroethane, the nonanesthetic compound 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane, and other polyhalogenated alkanes. Tested concentrations included effective anesthetic concentrations for the anesthetics and transitional compounds, and concentrations predicted to be anesthetic based on lipid solubility for the nonanesthetics. Isoflurane dose-dependently reduced depolarization-evoked glutamate release in cortical brain slices. Isoflurane and enflurane at concentrations equivalent to 1 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) reduced the KCl-evoked release to 20% and 17% of control, respectively. The transitional compound 1,1,2-trichlorotrifluoroethane at 210 microM (approximately 1.2 MAC) reduced glutamate release to 47%, and the nonanesthetic 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane increased glutamate release at 70 microM (approximately 3 MAC). These findings support the hypothesis that the modulation of excitatory neurotransmission might be responsible, in part, for in vivo anesthetic action. IMPLICATIONS: The volatile anesthetics isoflurane and enflurane reduce depolarization-evoked glutamate release in rat brain slices. The transitional compound 1,1,2-trichlorotrifluoroethane reduces glutamate release to a much lesser extent, and the nonanesthetic 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane does not reduce glutamate release. These findings support the hypothesis that the modulation of excitatory neurotransmission might be responsible, in part, for in vivo anesthetic action.

Alkanes↗

Thermogenesis inhibition in brown adipocytes is a specific property of volatile anesthetics.

BACKGROUND: This investigation examined the possibility that the inhibitory effect of halothane on nonshivering thermogenesis (heat production) in brown adipocytes is not a universal effect of all anesthetic agents but related to the type of anesthetic. METHODS: Brown adipocytes from hamster were isolated with a collagenase digestion method and incubated with anesthetic agents. The rate of oxygen consumption was measured with an oxygen electrode. The effect of clinically relevant (and higher) doses of anesthetics of different classes on basal and norepinephrine-induced thermogenesis (oxygen consumption) was tested. RESULTS: Two distinct groups of anesthetics could be distinguished: thermogenesis inhibitors and noninhibitors. Thermogenesis inhibitors include volatile anesthetics such as halothane (IC(50), 1.1 mm), ether (IC(50), 20 mm), and chloroform (IC(50), 2.2 mm) (nominal concentrations), but also tribromoethanol (IC(50), 0.6 mm), all inducing inhibition of norepinephrine-induced thermogenesis without affecting the EC for norepinephrine. Thermogenesis noninhibitors include the nonvolatile anesthetics pentobarbital, propofol, ketamine, and urethane, the inhalation anesthetic nitrous oxide, and, notably, also the volatile nonanesthetics (nonimmobilizers) 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane and 2,3-dichlorooctafluorobutane; none of these compounds had any effect on norepinephrine-induced thermogenesis at any concentration tested. CONCLUSIONS: There are two distinct classes of anesthetics with regard to effects on thermogenesis, thermogenesis inhibitors and thermogenesis noninhibitors. The results are important for the interpretation of studies in thermal biology in general; specifically, they indicate that conclusions concerning regulation of nonshivering thermogenesis during anesthesia depend on the type of anesthetic used. Of clinical importance is that the volatile anesthetics are inhibitory for nonshivering thermogenesis and thus for an alternative heat production when myorelaxants prevent shivering. As the distinction between thermogenesis inhibitors and thermogenesis noninhibitors corresponds to the distinction between volatile and nonvolatile anesthetics, it may be related to the mode of action of the volatile anesthetics.

Adipocytes↗

Differential protective effects of volatile anesthetics against renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in vivo.

BACKGROUND: Volatile anesthetics protect against cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury via adenosine triphosphate-dependent potassium channel activation. The authors questioned whether volatile anesthetics can also protect against renal ischemia-reperfusion injury and, if so, whether cellular adenosine triphosphate-dependent potassium channels, antiinflammatory effects of volatile anesthetics, or both are involved. METHODS: Rats were anesthetized with equipotent doses of volatile anesthetics (desflurane, halothane, isoflurane, or sevoflurane) or injectable anesthetics (pentobarbital or ketamine) and subjected to 45 min of renal ischemia and 3 h of reperfusion during anesthesia. RESULTS: Rats treated with volatile anesthetics had lower plasma creatinine and reduced renal necrosis 24-72 h after injury compared with rats anesthetized with pentobarbital or ketamine. Twenty-four hours after injury, sevoflurane-, isoflurane-, or halothane-treated rats had creatinine (+/- SD) of 2.3 +/- 0.7 mg/dl (n = 12), 1.8 +/- 0.5 mg/dl (n = 6), and 2.4 +/- 1.2 mg/dl (n = 6), respectively, compared with rats treated with pentobarbital (5.8 +/- 1.2 mg/dl, n = 9) or ketamine (4.6 +/- 1.2 mg/dl, n = 8). Among the volatile anesthetics, desflurane demonstrated the least reduction in plasma creatinine after 24 h (4.1 +/- 0.8 mg/dl, n = 12). Renal cortices from volatile anesthetic-treated rats demonstrated reduced expression of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 protein and messenger RNA as well as messenger RNAs encoding proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Volatile anesthetic treatment reduced renal cortex myeloperoxidase activity and reduced nuclear translocation of proinflammatory nuclear factor kappaB. Adenosine triphosphate-dependent potassium channels are not involved in sevoflurane-mediated renal protection because glibenclamide did not block renal protection (creatinine: 2.4 +/- 0.4 mg/dl, n = 3). CONCLUSION: Some volatile anesthetics confer profound protection against renal ischemia-reperfusion injury compared with pentobarbital or ketamine anesthesia by attenuating inflammation. These findings may have significant clinical implications for anesthesiologists regarding the choice of volatile anesthetic agents in patients subjected to perioperative renal ischemia.

ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters↗

Mechanism of the depressor action of LY171555, a selective dopamine D2 receptor agonist, in the anesthetized rat.

Administration of LY171555 (1 mg/kg i.v.) decreased mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate in both pentobarbital- and urethane-anesthesized Sprague-Dawley rats. The depressor response to LY171555 in pentobarbital-anesthetized rats was sustained for at least 30 min, but in urethane-anesthetized rats lasted only approximately 3 min after LY171555 injection. In pentobarbital-anesthetized rats, pretreatment with domperidone (0.5 mg/kg) or metoclopramide (5 mg/kg) attenuated the depressor action of LY171555, whereas pretreatment with d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)arginine vasopressin (AVP) (10 micrograms/kg) only delayed the recovery phase of the depressor response to LY171555. In contrast, LY171555 administered to urethane-anesthetized rats after domperidone pretreatment induced a pressor response which was blocked completely by d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)AVP. Metoclopramide pretreatment in urethane-anesthetized rats prevented the decreases in MAP and heart rate induced by LY171555, whereas pretreatment with d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)AVP delayed the recovery phase of the depressor response. Pretreatment with d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)AVP per se decreased basal MAP in the urethane-anesthetized group, but not in pentobarbital-anesthetized rats. Basal plasma norepinephrine, epinephrine and AVP levels were higher in urethane-anesthetized rats than in the pentobarbital-anesthetized group. LY171555 administration decreased plasma norepinephrine without altering plasma epinephrine in both groups and induced a significant increase in plasma AVP which was greater in the urethane-anesthetized rats than in pentobarbital-anesthetized animals. These results suggest that LY171555 decreases MAP and heart rate in anesthetized rats by inhibiting norepinephrine release from nerve endings through the peripheral dopamine D2 receptor and that the time course of the depressor response may be altered by LY171555-induced AVP release, the magnitude of which appears to be dependent on the anesthetic agent.

Anesthesia↗

Luciferase as a model for the site of inhaled anesthetic action.

UNLABELLED: The in vivo potencies of anesthetics correlate with their capacity to suppress the reaction of luciferin with luciferase. In addition, luciferin has structural resemblances to etomidate. These observations raise the issues of whether luciferin, itself, might affect anesthetic requirement, and whether luciferase resembles the site of anesthetic action. Because the polar luciferin is unlikely to cross the blood-brain barrier (we found that the olive oil/water partition coefficient was 100 +/- 36 x 10(-7)), we studied these issues in rats by measuring the effect of infusion of luciferin in artificial cerebrospinal fluid into the lumbar subarachnoidal space and into the cerebral intraventricular space on the MAC (the minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration required to eliminate movement in response to a noxious stimulus in 50% of tested subjects) of isoflurane. MAC in rats given lumbar intrathecal doses of luciferin estimated to greatly exceed anesthetizing doses of etomidate, did not differ significantly from MAC in rats receiving only artificial cerebrospinal fluid into the lumbar intrathecal space. MAC slightly decreased when doses of luciferin estimated to greatly exceed anesthetizing doses of etomidate were infused intraventricularly (P < 0.05). In contrast to the absent or minimal effects of luciferin, intrathecal or intraventricular infusion of etomidate at similar or smaller doses significantly decreased isoflurane MAC. Luciferin did not affect +-aminobutyric acid type A or acetylcholine receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. These results suggest that luciferin has minimal or no anesthetic effects. It also suggests that luciferin/luciferase may not provide a good surrogate for the site at which anesthetics act, if this site is on the surface of neuronal cells. IMPLICATIONS: In proportion to their potencies, anesthetics inhibit luciferin's action on luciferase, and luciferin structurally resembles the anesthetic etomidate. However, in contrast to etomidate, luciferin given intrathecally or into the third cerebral ventricle does not have anesthetic actions, and it does not affect +-aminobutyric acid or acetylcholine receptors in vitro. Luciferase may not provide a good surrogate for the site at which anesthetics act.

Anesthetics, Inhalation↗

A model for differential volatile anesthetic delivery to the upper and lower torso of the rabbit.

INTRODUCTION: We have developed a model that permits differential delivery of volatile anesthetics to the upper and lower torso of the rabbit. METHODS: Rabbits were anesthetized with isoflurane (n = 4) or halothane (n = 3), and blood was drained from a carotid cannula into a membrane oxygenator and reinfused via a renal artery cannula into the lower torso circulation using a roller pump. Bypass of the lower torso circulation was achieved by tightening a ligature around the aorta at the level of the renal arteries. Blood concentrations of anesthetic (assessed by gas chromatography) and cardiovascular responses to noxious stimulation were determined with and without anesthetic delivery to the membrane oxygenator. RESULTS: When the anesthetic was removed from the oxygenator gas flow, the arterial concentration of isoflurane in the lower torso was 28 +/- 15 microg/ml, while it was 133 +/- 28 microg/ml in the upper torso circulation; the corresponding values for the halothane-anesthetized rabbits were 63 +/- 8 and 270 +/- 49 microg/ml. There was a significant correlation (r=.92-.99) between pump flow and lower torso pressure in each individual rabbit. When anesthetic was delivered to both upper and lower torso, noxious electrical stimulation of the tail or hindpaw did not affect lower torso pressures (52 +/- 10 to 54 +/- 12 mmHg). Decreasing the anesthetic concentration in the lower torso resulted in significant increases in lower torso blood pressure during noxious stimulation (82 +/- 19 to 131 +/- 35 mmHg, P < .05). DISCUSSION: The results indicate that volatile anesthetics isoflurane and halothane can be differentially delivered to the upper and lower torso of the rabbit, with an approximate 75-80% reduction in the anesthetic concentration in the lower torso when the anesthetic is eliminated from the gas flow to the oxygenator. This preparation can be used to study the pharmacological properties of volatile anesthetics.

Abdomen↗