Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Tosyl Compounds”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17Linked to original sources

Pulmonary infiltrates, eosinophilia, and cardiomyopathy following corticosteroid withdrawal in patients with asthma receiving zafirlukast.

CONTEXT: Zafirlukast is a potent leukotriene antagonist that recently was approved for the treatment of asthma. As use of this drug increases, adverse events that occur at low frequency or in populations not studied in premarketing clinical trials may become evident. OBJECTIVE: To describe a clinical syndrome associated with zafirlukast therapy. DESIGN: Case series. PATIENTS: Eight adults (7 women and 1 man) with steroid-dependent asthma who received zafirlukast. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Development of a clinical syndrome characterized by pulmonary infiltrates, cardiomyopathy, and eosinophilia following the withdrawal of corticosteroid treatment. RESULTS: The clinical syndrome developed while patients were receiving zafirlukast from 3 days to 4 months and from 3 days to 3 months after corticosteroid withdrawal. All 8 patients developed leukocytosis (range, 14.5-27.6 x 10(9)/L) with eosinophilia (range, 0.19-0.71). Six patients had fever (temperature >38.5 degrees C), 7 had muscle pain, 6 had sinusitis, and 6 had biopsy evidence of eosinophilic tissue infiltration. The clinical syndrome improved with discontinuation of zafirlukast treatment and reinitiation of corticosteroid treatment or addition of cyclophosphamide treatment. COMMENT: Development of pulmonary infiltrates, cardiomyopathy, and eosinophilia may have occurred independent of zafirlukast use or may have resulted from an allergic response to this medication. We suspect that these patients may have had a primary eosinophilic infiltrative disorder that had been clinically recognized as asthma, was quelled by steroid treatment, and was unmasked following corticosteroid withdrawal facilitated by zafirlukast.

Adult↗

Synergistic activation of androgen receptor by androgen and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone in prostatic carcinoma cells.

BACKGROUND: We investigated modulation of androgen receptor (AR) activity in prostatic tumor cells by luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)-induced increase of the intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) level. METHODS: AR transactivation activity was assessed in transiently transfected DU-145 and in LNCaP cells. RESULTS: LHRH and cAMP derivative, respectively, induced reporter gene activity to about 15% of the maximal level in DU-145 cells transfected with an AR expression vector and an androgen-inducible reporter gene. LHRH or the cAMP analogue acted synergistically in combination with low concentrations of androgen thus lowering the androgen concentration required for maximal AR activation by a factor of 100. A similar activation of the AR by cAMP analogue was observed in LNCaP cells when enhancement of androgen-induced secretion of prostate-specific antigen was determined. The two nonsteroidal antiandrogens hydroxyflutamide and Casodex(R) inhibited reporter gene activity. CONCLUSIONS: The AR is synergistically activated by low doses of androgen and LHRH or the second messenger cAMP. This may have implications for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer.

Androgen Antagonists↗

Bicalutamide (Casodex) in the treatment of prostate cancer: history of clinical development.

BACKGROUND: Bicalutamide (Casodex) is a new nonsteroidal antiandrogen developed for use in patients with prostate cancer. The efficacy and tolerability of bicalutamide as monotherapy and as combination therapy for patients with advanced prostate cancer have been evaluated in randomized clinical trials. Clinical trials are currently in progress to further evaluate bicalutamide as monotherapy in patients with advanced stages of disease and as adjuvant or first-line therapy in patients with early-stage disease. METHODS: A review of published trials of bicalutamide focusing on dose-ranging investigations, phase II and phase III monotherapy trials, a phase III trial of combined androgen blockade, and a safety overview. RESULTS: In dose-ranging trials, bicalutamide doses of 10-200 elicited biochemical, objective, and subjective responses; higher bicalutamide doses (up to 600 mg) have also been evaluated. A 50-mg daily dose of bicalutamide was initially evaluated as monotherapy in phase II and phase III trials; in subsequent trials, a 150-mg daily dose was investigated. A 150-mg daily dose is considered to provide equivalent survival outcome compared with castration in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer, whereas the benefits of a better quality of life and better palliation with the 150-mg daily bicalutamide dose relative to castration in patients with metastatic disease needs to be balanced against the small shortfall (median difference, 42 days) in survival. In combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist analogue (LHRH-A), a 50-mg daily dose of bicalutamide has equivalent efficacy to a corresponding flutamide (250 mg three times daily) combination regimen. Treatment with the bicalutamide combination regimen resulted in a longer median survival than with the flutamide combination regimen. Bicalutamide is well tolerated when used as monotherapy or in combination with a LHRH-A. The benefits of bicalutamide as monotherapy include retention of libido and sexual potency and as combination therapy a lower incidence of diarrhea relative to flutamide. CONCLUSIONS: A 50-mg daily dose of bicalutamide is sufficient when given in combination with an agent, such as a LHRH-A, that lowers serum testosterone, but higher doses of bicalutamide may be needed when the drug is given as monotherapy. Bicalutamide, 50-mg daily, is a logical first choice for antiandrogen therapy when used in combination with an LHRH-A for the treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer. Bicalutamide 150-mg daily is considered an effective monotherapy for use in patients with locally advanced disease. Additional clinical trials are currently in progress to further evaluate bicalutamide as a monotherapy for advanced prostate cancer and to assess its value as adjuvant or first-line therapy for early-stage prostate cancer.

Anilides↗

Bicalutamide dosages used in the treatment of prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Androgen deprivation is often used for the treatment of patients with prostate cancer. Androgen deprivation can be achieved by surgical castration or medical castration, with or without using an antiandrogen. Each of these treatments may be used alone, or an antiandrogen may be used alongside castration to produce combined androgen blockade therapy. METHODS: The nonsteroidal antiandrogen, bicalutamide (Casodex), has been evaluated as a component in combined androgen blockade and as monotherapy. We review the arguments that indicate why a 50-mg once-daily dose of bicalutamide is appropriate in combined androgen blockade, while ongoing clinical trials evaluate 150-mg once-daily as monotherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer. RESULTS: The choice of the 50-mg dose of bicalutamide when used in combined androgen blockade is supported by four main arguments. First, bicalutamide 50 mg is at least equivalent to, if not better than, flutamide 750 mg in terms of receptor affinity, potency, and favorable plasma concentration profile. Second, the reduction in testosterone concentrations produced by medical or surgical castration decreases the potential competition between bicalutamide and testosterone for androgen receptors in prostate cells, allowing the use of a lower dose of antiandrogen in combined androgen blockade than is necessary in monotherapy. Third, bicalutamide 50 mg has an excellent tolerability profile. Fourth, at the 50-mg dose, bicalutamide plus luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue was equivalent to flutamide plus luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue, although there was a trend towards longer survival with bicalutamide. Furthermore, investigations of higher doses of bicalutamide have justified evaluation of bicalutamide 150 mg as monotherapy. First, pharmacodynamic studies reveal an increasing prostate-specific antigen response with increasing dose, which appears to plateau at a dose of around 150-200 mg. Second, in an analysis with 31% mortality, bicalutamide 150 mg appeared to have equivalent efficacy compared with castration in terms of survival in patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of available data, bicalutamide 50 mg is an appropriate dose to use in combined androgen blockade, while 150 mg is being evaluated in ongoing clinical trials as a suitable dose for monotherapy.

Androgen Antagonists↗

Exploratory analysis on the effect of race on clinical outcome in patients with advanced prostate cancer receiving bicalutamide or flutamide, each in combination with LHRH analogues. The Casodex Combination Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Black race has been associated with a significantly increased risk of prostate cancer mortality. This exploratory analysis investigated the effect of race on the clinical outcome of combined androgen blockade (CAB). METHODS: Data for analysis were obtained from a double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial comparing CAB in the form of bicalutamide (50 mg once daily) or flutamide (250 mg three times daily) plus luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogs (LHRHa; goserelin acetate 3.6 mg, or leuprolide acetate 7.5 mg) in 813 patients with stage D(2) prostate cancer (median follow-up, 160 weeks). Patients were analyzed according to race (African American [AA], white, or other). The primary clinical events were disease progression and survival. RESULTS: Four hundred and four patients received bicalutamide/LHRHa and 409 received flutamide/LHRHa. Although treatment with bicalutamide/LHRHa resulted in slightly longer time to progression and survival time in white and AA males than treatment with flutamide/LHRHa, the differences between the treatment groups were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: No marked effect of race on clinical outcome was observed regardless of antiandrogen, suggesting that similar treatment benefits are to be expected in either race.

Adenocarcinoma↗

A controlled trial of bicalutamide versus flutamide, each in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy, in patients with advanced prostate carcinoma. Analysis of time to progression. CASODEX Combination Study Group.

BACKGROUND: A randomized, multicenter trial, double-blind for antiandrogen therapy, compared the antiandrogens bicalutamide and flutamide, each combined with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy (LHRH-A) in 813 patients with Stage D2 prostate carcinoma. An analysis of time to progression (median follow-up, 95 weeks) was performed to augment previous analyses of time to treatment failure and time to death. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to double-blind antiandrogen therapy, receiving either bicalutamide (50 mg once daily) or flutamide (250 mg three times daily), and were assigned 2:1 to LHRH-A with goserelin acetate (3.6 mg every 28 days) or leuprolide acetate (7.5 mg every 28 days). The primary endpoint of the trial was time to treatment failure, defined as an adverse event leading to withdrawal of randomized therapy, objective progression, death, or withdrawal from study therapy for any reason. Secondary endpoints were time to death, quality of life, and subjective response. The current analysis of time to progression included progression data collected prospectively for 561 patients (69%) and retrospectively for 252 patients (31%). RESULTS: Disease progression occurred for 223 of 404 patients (55%) in the bicalutamide plus LHRH-A group and for 235 of 409 patients (58%) in the flutamide plus LHRH-A group. The hazard ratio for time to progression of bicalutamide plus LHRH-A to that of flutamide plus LHRH-A was 0.9 (two-sided 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 1.08; P = 0.26). The upper one-sided 95% CI was 1.05, which met the definition of equivalence (< 1.25). CONCLUSIONS: At a median follow-up time of 95 weeks, bicalutamide plus LHRH-A and flutamide plus LHRH-A had equivalent time to progression.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Chemical modification of amino acid residues in glycerinated Vorticella stalk and Ca(2+)-induced contractility.

The glycerinated stalk of the peritrich ciliate Vorticella, was treated with various reagents to chemically modify the amino acid residues. The influences of these modifcations on spasmoneme contractility were investigated. First, it was confirmed that the spasmoneme contraction is not inhibited by alteration of SH groups. It was also demonstrated that chemical modification of methionine and tryptophan residues abolishes spasmoneme contractility. The reagents used for chemical modification were N-bromosuccinimide (NBS), chloramine T, and 2-hydroxy-5-nitrobenzyl bromide (HNBB), which abolished spasmoneme contractility at concentrations of 40-50 microM, 200-300 microM, and 4 mM, respectively. These results suggest that, along with Ca2+ binding proteins, there are other as yet to be identified proteins involved in contractility.

2-Hydroxy-5-nitrobenzyl Bromide↗

The effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of the bicalutamide ('Casodex') enantiomers.

'Casodex' (bicalutamide) is an orally active, non-steroidal, pure antiandrogen; it is a racemate with antiandrogenic activity residing predominantly in the (R)-enantiomer. Healthy male volunteers (n = 15) were administered single oral doses of bicalutamide (50 mg) after food and after fasting as part of a three-treatment, three-period, randomized cross-over study, with a 9 week washout. After fasting, plasma concentrations of (R)-bicalutamide were much higher than those of (S)-bicalutamide; the mean (R)-enantiomer Cmax (734 ng mL-1) was about nine times higher than the (S)-enantiomer value (84 ng mL-1). The corresponding tmax values were 19 and 3 h for (R)- and (S)-bicalutamide, respectively. Elimination of (R)-bicalutamide from plasma was monoexponential and slow (t1/2 = 5.8 d). Elimination of (S)-bicalutamide was biphasic in some volunteers but monophasic in others (terminal t1/2 =1.2 d; n = 11). There was no significant effect of food on AUC, tmax, or t1/2 data for either enantiomer. The observed slightly higher values of Cmax for (R)-bicalutamide (14%) and (S)-bicalutamide (19%), when dosing with food, achieved statistical significance. However, differences of this magnitude are unlikely to to be of any clinical relevance. These data indicate that 'Casodex' can be taken without reference to meal times; this may be of particular relevance for its indication in a disease of the elderly.

Administration, Oral↗

Vascular endothelial growth factor expression and capillary architecture in high-grade PIN and prostate cancer in untreated and androgen-ablated patients.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated that angiogenesis is a potent prognostic indicator for patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and have pointed out that the evaluation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is useful in assessing the angiogenic phenotype in PCa. The aim of the study was to investigate immunohistochemically the expression of VEGF and its correlation with the pattern of capillary architecture in prostate cancer and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), in untreated and androgen-ablated patients. METHODS: Forty-five patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized prostate carcinoma were recruited for this study. The study population included two groups: 35 patients who did not receive chemo-, hormone, or radiation therapy before surgery, and 10 patients who were under complete androgen blockade (CAB) for 3 months at time of surgery. VEGF was examined by immunohistochemistry, and its tissue expression was compared with the pattern of capillary architecture evaluated by immunostaining the endothelial antigen CD34. The relationship of VEGF expression to chromogranin A-positive (e.g., neuroendocrine) cells was investigated. RESULTS: In normal tissue, the intensity of the VEGF immunoreactivity in the cytoplasm of secretory cells ranged from negative to low. Very few basal cells stained for VEGF. All prostate cancer specimens stained positively, the intensity of the immunoreaction ranging from low to strong and being correlated with the Gleason score. Strongly positive VEGF immunoreactivity was detected in vascular endothelial cells and in stromal cells surrounding blood vessels. Two discrete immunostaining patterns were observed in high-grade PIN. VEGF expression of low-to-moderate intensity was defined as pattern A. The other, characterized by a strong cytoplasmic immunoreaction similar to that of poorly differentiated tumors, was defined as pattern B. The capillary architecture in high-grade PIN with pattern A was similar to the orderly vascular network seen in normal prostates, whereas in the pattern B it had the characteristics of microvessels usually seen in PCa. The degree of vascularization in the stroma adjacent to intensely VEGF-stained cells (neuroendocrine phenotype) was higher than that noted in association with secretory cells. CAB before surgery downregulated the expression of VEGF and decreased the degree of vascularization, except in the cell areas with neuroendocrine (NE) features. CONCLUSIONS: Our immunohistochemical results indicate that significant levels of VEGF are present in prostate cancer and in a population of PIN lesions, expression being highest in association with NE cells. VEGF expression is downregulated by hormonal manipulation, except in the population of NE cells.

Adenocarcinoma↗

The effect of bicalutamide on prostate histology.

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal antiandrogens are commonly used in the treatment of prostate cancer, but more clinical and laboratory studies on patients with benign as well as malignant prostate diseases are required to define their exact role. METHODS: Light microscopic examination of perineal prostate biopsies of 21 men with BPH was performed pretreatment, after 24 weeks of therapy with 50 mg bicalutamide (Casodex) or placebo and 24 weeks after end of treatment. We assessed whether it was possible to distinguish between patients having received bicalutamide or placebo based on a general histological examination. In addition, the volume fractions of the prostatic epithelial, luminal, and stromal compartments were determined by morphometry. RESULTS: Histological changes following treatment were uncharacteristic and patients treated with bicalutamide were not identified. At morphometry prior to therapy, the prostates of the study participants consisted of 91.8% stroma (range 78.9-97.2), 5.5% epithelium (range 1.4-14.1) and 2.7% glandular lumen (range 0.8-7.5). Changes in the relative content of the three tissue components following treatment were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe consistent morphological changes in the prostate following treatment with bicalutamide at a dose of 50 mg daily. However, this dose is lower than the 150 mg dose presently recommended for bicalutamide monotherapy.

Aged↗

Long-term exposure of tumor necrosis factor alpha causes hypersensitivity to androgen and anti-androgen withdrawal phenomenon in LNCaP prostate cancer cells.

BACKGROUND: One of the mechanisms through which prostate cancers relapse during anti-androgen therapy may involve adaptation to low concentrations of androgen induced by anti-androgen therapies. Recent studies from our laboratory have reported that tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha) is secreted from prostate cancer epithelial cells and LNCaP cells. We hypothesized that TNFalpha changes androgen-sensitivity in LNCaP cells. METHODS: We cultured LNCaP cells for more than 3 months in the presence of 50 ng/ml TNFalpha and established TNFalpha-resistant LNCaP cells (LN-TR2). Sensitivity to androgen was examined by the cell proliferation assay. We also transfected LNCaP and LN-TR2 cells with a luciferase reporter plasmid driven by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) promoter and compared PSA promoter activity. Nuclear localization of AR protein that binds to target genes was also examined by Western blotting. RESULTS: LN-TR2 cells had increased sensitivity to dihydrotestosterone (DHT) (i.e., proliferation and PSA promoter activation) than LNCaP cells. Total AR mRNA and AR protein levels were decreased in LN-TR2 cells. However, LN-TR2 cells demonstrated increased levels of nuclear AR compared to LNCaP cells. At 1 nM DHT, the anti-androgen bicalutamide stimulated LN-TR2 and inhibited LNCaP proliferation. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term exposure of TNFalpha causes hypersensitivity to DHT in LNCaP and this was associated with increased nuclear AR protein. Furthermore, hypersensitivity to androgen caused anti-androgen withdrawal phenomenon in the presence of DHT although bicalutamide itself did not stimulate LNCaP proliferation without androgen. This result may be one possible mechanism for the anti-androgen withdrawal phenomenon.

Androgen Antagonists↗

Antiandrogenic agents as monotherapy in advanced prostatic carcinoma.

Pure antiandrogens have a quality-of-life advantage over other androgen ablation methods in the treatment of patients with prostatic cancer because they do not reduce the serum testosterone and therefore do not have a marked inhibitory effect on libido and potency. The long half-life of two of the three currently studied pure antiandrogens permits once-a-day administration, which should enhance patient compliance. With continued administration, there is a gradual rise in serum testosterone, and the clinical impact of this requires additional study using randomized Phase III trials. Proper stratification of patients at entry into such studies with documentation of various prognostic factors will add statistical value and enable physicians to draw better conclusion on the relative efficacy of these agents.

Androgen Antagonists↗

Prognostic factors in stage D2 prostate cancer treated with a pure nonsteroidal antiandrogen.

BACKGROUND: Prognostic factors have been shown to be important when stratifying patients with prostate cancer into randomized trials and counseling the individual patient regarding his chances of response to treatment. However, there are no reports on prognostic factors in patients with Stage D2 prostate cancer treated with a pure antiandrogen as monotherapy. METHODS: The authors studied a variety of possible prognostic factors among 150 patients with metastatic prostate cancer treated with an antiandrogen (Casodex, Imperial Chemical Industries, Wilmington, DE). RESULTS: In a univariate analysis, performance status; extent of disease (EOD); pretreatment hemoglobin, alkaline phosphatase, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) levels; and extent of disease (EOD) on bone scan all were found to be significant prognostic factors (P < 0.05). Pretreatment serum testosterone levels, identified as one of the most important prognostic factors, was not identified as significant in the current study. CONCLUSIONS: Although the pretreatment testosterone level was shown to be an important prognostic factor in previous studies, using other modes of androgen ablation (reducing testosterone to below castrate levels), the current study suggest it may not be a helpful factor if the therapy used is antiandrogens as monotherapy. This may relate to the different mode of action of antiandrogens, which do not reduce serum testosterone levels.

Androgen Antagonists↗

Modeling solid-to-solid biocatalysis: integration of six consecutive steps.

A quantitative model for the conversion of a solid-substrate salt to a solid-product salt in a batch bioreactor seeded with product crystals is presented. The overall process consists of six serial steps (with dissolution and crystallization each in themselves complex multistep processes): solid-salt dissolution, salt dissociation into an ionic substrate and a counter-ion, bioconversion accompanied by biocatalyst inactivation, complexation of the ionic product with the counter-ion, and salt crystal growth. In the model, the consecutive steps are integrated, including biocatalyst inactivation and assuming that salt dissociation and complexation of ions are at equilibrium. Model parameters were determined previously in separate independent experiments. To validate the model, either dissolved or solid Ca-maleate was converted to solid Ca-D-malate by permeabilized Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes in a batch bioreactor seeded with Ca-D-malate crystals. The model very well predicted the concentrations of all components in the liquid phase (Ca-maleate, Ca(2+), maleate(2-), D-malate(2-), and Ca-D-malate) and the amounts of the solid phases (Ca-maleate. H(2)O and Ca-D-malate. 3H(2)O), especially when high initial amounts of Ca-maleate. H(2)O and Ca-D-malate. 3H(2)O were present.

Bioreactors↗

Inhibition of human cytochrome P450 isoforms in vitro by zafirlukast.

Zafirlukast is a cysteinyl leukotriene antagonist used to treat allergic and exercise-induced asthma. This in vitro study used human liver microsomes to evaluate the inhibitory activity of zafirlukast versus six human cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms. Zafirlukast (0-250 microM) was co-incubated with fixed concentrations of index substrates. Zafirlukast inhibited the hydroxylation of tolbutamide (CYP2C9; mean IC(50)=7.0 microM), triazolam (CYP3A; IC(50)=20.9 microM) and S-mephenytoin (CYP2C19; IC(50)=32.7 microM), and was a less potent inhibitor of phenacetin O-deethylation (CYP1A2; IC(50)=56 microM) and dextromethorphan O-demethylation (CYP2D6; IC(50)=116 microM). Zafirlukast produced negligible inhibition of CYP2E1. In vitro inhibition of CYP2C9 by zafirlukast is consistent with clinical studies showing impaired clearance of S-warfarin and enhanced anti-thrombotic effects, although the in vitro IC(50) value is higher than the usual range of clinically relevant plasma concentrations. Zafirlukast deserves further clinical study as an inhibitor of other CYP2C9 substrates such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, tolbutamide, phenytoin and mestranol. Clinically important inhibition by zafirlukast of other CYP isoforms is not established.

Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors↗

Leukotriene receptor antagonists for non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis.

BACKGROUND: Leukotriene receptor antagonists are a new class of drug that were initially identified for use in asthma. As they have an effect on neutrophil mediated inflammation, they may be of benefit in bronchiectasis. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether leukotriene receptor antagonists have any additive benefit over and above conventional treatment for bronchiectasis (usually consisting of antibiotics and postural drainage). SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Airways Group clinical trials register derived from MEDLINE, EMBASE and hand searching of major journals was searched using the terms:Bronchiec* AND leukotrien* OR anti-leuk* OR cysteinyl, Bronchiec* AND monteluk*, Bronchiec* AND zafirluk* SELECTION CRITERIA: Only randomised, controlled trials were considered DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The results of searches were analysed by both authors MAIN RESULTS: No randomised, controlled trials were identified REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Further research is required to establish any benefit from the use of leukotriene antagonists in bronchiectasis.

Acetates↗