Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Statins”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Statin therapy, inflammation and recurrent coronary events in patients following coronary stent implantation.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate whether statin therapy affects the association between preprocedural C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and the risk for recurrent coronary events in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation. BACKGROUND: Low-grade inflammation as detected by elevated CRP levels predicts the risk of recurrent coronary events. The effect of inflammation on coronary risk may be attenuated by statin therapy. METHODS: We investigated a potential interrelation among statin therapy, serum evidence of inflammation, and the risk for recurrent coronary events in 388 consecutive patients undergoing coronary stent implantation. Patients were grouped according to the median CRP level (0.6 mg/dl) and to the presence of statin therapy. RESULTS: A primary combined end point event occurred significantly more frequently in patients with elevated CRP levels without statin therapy (RR [relative risk] 2.37, 95% CI [confidence interval] [1.3 to 4.2]). Importantly, in the presence of statin therapy, the RR for recurrent events was significantly reduced in the patients with elevated CRP levels (RR 1.27 [0.7 to 2.1]) to about the same degree as in patients with CRP levels below 0.6 mg/dl and who did not receive statin therapy (RR 1.1 [0.8 to 1.3]). CONCLUSIONS: Statin therapy significantly attenuates the increased risk for major adverse cardiac events in patients with elevated CRP levels undergoing coronary stent implantation, suggesting that statin therapy interferes with the detrimental effects of inflammation on accelerated atherosclerotic disease progression following coronary stenting.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Statin use and the risk of breast cancer.

The study objective was to investigate a possible association between statin use and breast cancer (BRCA). An historical cohort design based on Saskatchewan's population health services databases was used. All eligible women with > or = 1 statin prescription from 1989 to mid-1997 and an age-sex-matched nonexposed group were followed up to 8.5 years (mean 4.2 years). Relative rates (RR) of BRCA were estimated and stratified by age, statin exposure time, and prior hormone use. Thirteen thousand five hundred ninety-two statin users and 53,880 nonexposed subjects were identified. Eight hundred seventy-nine incident BRCA cases were identified. Statins were not associated with BRCA risk in women < or = 55 years. Among subjects >55 years, the RR for BRCA was 1.15 (0.97, 1.37). Stratified analyses revealed increases in risk in short-term statin users and statin users with long-term hormone replacement therapy (HRT) exposure. More studies are needed to determine if short-term statin use and statin use with long-term HRT exposure increases postmenopausal BRCA risk. Published by Elsevier Science Inc.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Statin inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase: a 3-dimensional view.

Statins act by inhibiting 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase and thereby reducing cholesterol synthesis. In X-ray crystallographic studies, we have determined the structures of the catalytic portions of the enzyme in complex with statin molecules. These studies show that the HMG-like moiety of statin molecules occupy the HMG binding site of the enzyme, with the hydrophobic groups of the statins occupying a binding site exposed by movement of flexible helices in the enzyme catalytic domain. In addition to bonds formed by the HMG-like moiety, statins exhibit different types and numbers of binding interactions in association with structural differences. Type 1 statins (e.g., simvastatin) exhibit binding via a decalin ring structure, and type 2 statins (e.g., rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, fluvastatin) exhibit additional binding via their fluorophenyl group. Rosuvastatin and atorvastatin exhibit hydrogen bonds absent from other type 2 statins; rosuvastatin exhibits a unique bond via its electronegative sulfone group. Differences in statin structure and binding characteristics may partially contribute to differences in potency of HMG-CoA reductase inhibition and other pharmacologic properties.

Cholesterol↗
PubMed2002

HMG CoA reductase inhibitors affect the fibrinolytic system of human vascular cells in vitro: a comparative study using different statins.

1. The results of several clinical studies investigating the effect of statin therapy on the fibrinolytic system in vivo are inconclusive. We compared the effect of six different statins (atorvastatin, cerivastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, simvastatin) on components of the fibrinolytic system expressed by human vascular endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells and by the human hepatoma cell line HepG2. 2. All statins used except pravastatin significantly decreased PAI-1 production in human endothelial and smooth muscle cells. This effect was also seen in the presence of IL-1 alpha and TNF-alpha. All statins except pravastatin increased t-PA production in human smooth muscle cells. On a molar basis cerivastatin was the most effective HMG CoA reductase inhibitor used. Only simvastatin and lovastatin increased t-PA production in endothelial cells. The effects on the fibrinolytic system were reversed by mevalonate. Statins decreased mRNA levels for PAI-1 in endothelial and smooth muscle cells and increased mRNA levels for t-PA in smooth muscle cells. Statins did not affect PAI-1 expression in HepG2 cells. Cell viability was not influenced by statins in endothelial cells and HepG2 cells whereas in smooth muscle cells a cytotoxic effect was seen at high concentrations. 3. If the effects on the fibrinolytic system of vascular cells in vitro shown in this study are also operative in vivo one could speculate that by increasing t-PA and decreasing PAI-1 at sites of vascular lesions statins might reduce fibrin formation and thrombus development. Such an effect might contribute to the clinically proven benefits of statin therapy.

Cell Line↗
PubMed2004

Effect of statins and ACE inhibitors alone and in combination on clinical outcome in patients with coronary heart disease.

We assessed the 'synergy' of statins and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) in reducing vascular events in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). The GREek Atorvastatin and CHD Evaluation (GREACE) Study, suggested that aggressive reduction of low density lipoprotein cholesterol to 2.59 mmol/l (<100 mg/dl) significantly reduces morbidity and mortality in CHD patients, in comparison to undertreated patients. In this post hoc analysis of GREACE the patients (n=1600) were divided into four groups according to long-term treatment: Group A (n=460 statin+ACEI), B (n=420; statin, no ACEI), C (n=371;no statin, on ACEI), and D (n=349; no statin, no ACEI). Analysis of variance was used to assess differences in the relative risk reduction (RRR) in 'all events' (primary end point) between groups. During the 3-year follow-up there were 292 cardiovascular events; 45 (10% of patients) in group A, 61 (14.5%) in group B, 91 in group C (24.5%) and 95 events in group D (27%). The RRR (95% confidence interval (CI) in the primary end point in group A was 31%, (95% CI -48 to -6%, P=0.01) in comparison to group B, 59% (95% CI -72 to -48%, P<0.0001) to group C and 63% (95% CI -74 to -51%, P<0.0001) to group D. There was no significant difference in RRR between groups C and D (9%, CI -27-10%, P=0.1). Other factors (eg the blood pressure) that can influence clinical outcome did not differ significantly between the four treatment groups. In conclusion, the statin+ACEI combination reduces cardiovascular events more than a statin alone and considerably more than an ACEI alone. Aggressive statin use in the absence of an ACEI also substantially reduced cardiovascular events. Treatment with an ACEI in the absence of a statin use reduced clinical events in comparison to patients not treated with an ACEI but not significantly, at least in these small groups of patients.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Predictors of long-term persistence on statins in a subsidized clinical population.

OBJECTIVES: The use of statins in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease is currently under debate. This study characterizes and identifies predictors of the persistence of use of statins in a clinical cohort of subsidized new users of similar age to the WOSCOPS trial subjects. METHODS: Medical, pharmaceutical, and demographic records for the period January 1, 1987 through December 31, 1994 were extracted from the databases of Québec's provincial health plan for a 10% random sample of social assistance recipients. Patients remained eligible for inclusion if they had received a first dispensation of a statin between January 1, 1987 and July 31, 1994. Persistence was defined as the number of days on treatment with a statin while continuing to renew dispensations within a defined time limit. RESULTS: New users of statins included 983 social assistance recipients who were observed for a total of 2,439,153 person-days. Median persistence on statin treatment was 173 (95% CI = 155, 204) days. Only 13% of patients persisted for 5 years of treatment. A higher index of chronic morbidity, pre-existing cardiovascular disease, and previous use of nicotinic acid were predictive of longer persistence on statin medication. Those patients whose first statin dispensation was for lovastatin discontinued treatment earlier than those whose first dispensation was for pravastatin or simvastatin. CONCLUSIONS: New users showed low persistence on statins in a cohort of socially assisted persons aged 45-64, in spite of the minimal financial cost of the drug for such beneficiaries of Québec's provincial health plan.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2002

Statin treatment is associated with reduced thermal heterogeneity in human atherosclerotic plaques.

AIMS: Heat released from atherosclerotic plaques as a result of the local inflammatory process, may be measured in vivo by a thermography catheter. Statins seem to have an antiinflammatory effect which results in plaque stabilization. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of statins on plaque temperature. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population included 72 patients: 21 with effort angina, 32 with unstable angina and 19 with acute myocardial infarction. In the study group, 37 patients received statins for more than 4 weeks and 35 were not receiving statins. We measured the temperature difference (deltaT) between the atherosclerotic plaque and the proximal vessel wall (background temperature) using a thermography catheter. The statistical analysis showed that the mean value of deltaT was higher in the untreated group compared to the treated-with-statin, group (0.56+/-0.41 vs 0.29+/-0.33 degrees C, P<0.01). Moreover, a progressive increase in deltaT by type of clinical syndrome was observed in both groups (statin group; effort angina: 0.24+/-0.15, unstable angina: 0.26+/-0.26, acute myocardial infarction: 0.40+/-0.28, vs untreated group; effort angina: 0.41+/-0.26, unstable angina: 0.44+/-0.28, acute myocardial infarction: 0.84+/-0.52, P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that treatment with statins was an independent factor in temperature variation, after taking into account the effect of the clinical syndrome (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients on statin treatment produce less heat from the culprit coronary lesion than those not treated. Thus, statins seem to have a favourable effect on heat release from atherosclerotic plaques, and whether this effect has an impact on plaque stabilization needs to be investigated in future studies.

Arteriosclerosis↗
PubMed2004

Patients with elevated liver enzymes are not at higher risk for statin hepatotoxicity.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Studies that evaluate the risk of hepatotoxicity from statins in hyperlipidemic subjects with elevated baseline serum transaminases are lacking. We conducted a study to test the hypothesis that patients with elevated baseline liver enzymes have higher risk of statin hepatotoxicity. METHODS: Our study consisted of the following 3 cohorts of patients seen between January 1, 1998 and June 31, 2002: Cohort 1: 342 hyperlipidemic patients with elevated baseline enzymes (AST >40 IU/L or ALT >35 IU/L) who were prescribed a statin; cohort 2: 1437 hyperlipidemic patients with normal transaminases who were prescribed a statin; and cohort 3: 2245 patients with elevated liver enzymes but who were not prescribed a statin. The effect of statins on liver biochemistries was assessed over a 6-month period after statins were prescribed. Elevations in liver biochemistries during follow-up were categorized into mild-moderate or severe based on predefined criteria. RESULTS: The incidence of mild-moderate elevations and severe elevations in liver biochemistries in cohort 1 were 4.7% and 0.6%, respectively. Compared with cohort 1, individuals in cohort 2 had lower incidence of mild-moderate elevations (1.9%, P = 0.002) but not severe elevations (0.2%, P = 0.2). However, between cohorts 1 and 3, there were no differences in the incidence of mild-moderate elevations (4.7% vs. 6.4%, respectively, P = 0.2) or severe elevations (0.6% vs. 0.4%, respectively, P = 0.6). Statin discontinuation during the follow-up was similar between cohorts 1 and 2 (11.1% vs. 10.7%, respectively, P = 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that individuals with elevated baseline liver enzymes do not have higher risk for hepatotoxicity from statins.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Statins modulate the levels of osteoprotegerin/receptor activator of NFkappaB ligand mRNA in mouse bone-cell cultures.

Statins stimulate bone formation partly by inducing osteoblast differentiation, although there is controversy about the effects of statins on bone mineral density and fracture risk. Several studies have revealed that statins suppress bone resorption. However, the mechanism by which statins inhibit bone resorption is still unclear. The present study was performed to clarify the effects of statins on osteoclast formation as well as the levels of osteoprotegerin (OPG) and receptor activator of NFkappaB ligand (RANKL) mRNA in mouse bone-cell cultures by semiquantitative RT-PCR. 10(-8) M 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25(OH)2D3] significantly stimulated osteoclast formation and 10(-6) M statins (mevastatin and simvastatin) significantly antagonized osteoclast formation stimulated by 1,25(OH)2D3 in mouse bone-cell cultures, including both osteoblasts and osteoclasts. 10(-6) M mevastatin and simvastatin increased the level of OPG mRNA in mouse bone-cell cultures. On the other hand, 10(-6) M mevastatin and simvastatin inhibited the level of RANKL mRNA in these cultures. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that statins inhibit osteoclast formation in mouse bone-cell cultures. Moreover, statins also increased and decreased the levels of OPG and RANKL mRNA expression in these cultures, respectively. The modulation of OPG/RANKL may be involved in the inhibition of osteoclast formation by statins.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Mechanisms of statin-mediated inhibition of small G-protein function.

3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) have been reported to reduce the risk of Alzheimer disease. We have shown previously that statins inhibit a beta-amyloid (Abeta)-mediated inflammatory response through mechanisms independent of cholesterol reduction. Specifically, statins exert anti-inflammatory actions through their ability to prevent the isoprenylation of members of the Rho family of small G-proteins, resulting in the functional inactivation of these G-proteins. We report that statin treatment of microglia results in perturbation of the cytoskeleton and morphological changes due to alteration in Rho family function. Statins also block Abeta-stimulated phagocytosis through inhibition of Rac action. Paradoxically, the statin-mediated inactivation of G-protein function was associated with increased GTP loading of Rac and RhoA, and this effect was observed in myeloid lineage cells and other cell types. Statin treatment disrupted the interaction of Rac with its negative regulator the Rho guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor (RhoGDI), an interaction that is dependent on protein isoprenylation. We propose that lack of negative regulation accounts for the increased GTP loading. Isoprenylation of Rac is also required for efficient interaction with the plasma membrane, and we report that statin treatment dramatically reduces the capacity of Rac to interact with membranes. These results suggest a mechanism by which statins inhibit the actions of Rho GTPases and attenuate Abeta-stimulated inflammation.

Alzheimer Disease↗
PubMed2005

Effect of statins and aspirin alone and in combination on clinical outcome in dyslipidaemic patients with coronary heart disease. A subgroup analysis of the GREACE study.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST: The GREACE study was conducted independently; no Company or Institution has supported it financially. Some of the authors have attended conferences and participated in other trials sponsored by various pharmaceutical companies. We assessed the possible 'synergy' of statins and aspirin (ASA) in reducing vascular events in patients with coronary heart disease, in a post hoc analysis of the GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary-heart-disease Evaluation (GREACE) study. All patients (n = 1600) were divided into four groups according to long-term treatment: Group A (n = 787; statin + ASA), B (n = 93; statin - no ASA), C (n = 599; no statin - on ASA) and D (n = 121; no statin - no ASA). From all patients 692 were either on a statin or ASA monotherapy (Groups B + C). Relative risk reductions (RRRs) in 'all events' (primary endpoint) between groups were assessed. During the 3-year follow-up there were 292 cardiovascular events; 92 (12% of patients) in Group A, 14 (15%) in group B, 144 in Group C (24%) and 42 events in Group D (35%). The total number of events in Group B + C was 158 (23%). The RRRs in the primary endpoint were: Group A versus B 24% (P = 0.1912), A versus C 51% (P < 0.0001), A versus B + C 49% (P < 0.0001) and A versus D 71% (P < 0.0001). The RRRs in Group B versus C was 36% (P = 0.0431) and B versus D 57% (P = 0.0012), while in C versus D 33% (P = 0.0084). Our findings show that statins and ASA have an additive effect in reducing cardiovascular events. Aggressive statin use in the absence of ASA also substantially reduced cardiovascular events. Treatment with ASA in the absence of statin use reduced clinical events in comparison to patients not treated with either drug.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Statins and prostate cancer risk: a case-control study.

Observational studies have shown that 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin) use may be associated with reduced cancer risk. The purpose of this case-control study was to elucidate the association between statin use and prostate cancer risk. Prostate cancer cases (n = 100), recruited upon referral for prostate biopsy, and frequency age-matched, prostate-specific antigen-normal clinic controls (n = 202) were recruited from the Portland, Oregon, Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Information on any use of statins from May 1997 through August 2004 was obtained from an electronic pharmacy database. Days of use, type of statin, dose, and prescription changes were recorded. Duration and intensity were calculated for each statin type on the basis of days of use and prescribed dose. Thirty-six percent of cases and 49 percent of controls had a record of any statin use. Following adjustment for other potential risk factors, statin use was associated with a significant reduction in prostate cancer risk (odds ratio = 0.38, 95% confidence interval: 0.21, 0.69). Furthermore, in analyses stratified by Gleason score, the inverse association with statin use was maintained only among men with Gleason scores of > or =7 (odds ratio = 0.24, 95% confidence interval: 0.11, 0.53). The results of this case-control study suggest that statins may reduce the risk of total prostate cancer and, specifically, more aggressive prostate cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Lipophilic statins suppress cytotoxicity by freshly isolated natural killer cells through modulation of granule exocytosis.

NK cells, a component of the innate immune system, provide a first line of defense against viral infections and malignancies, interact with the adaptive immune system and have a role in rejection of allogeneic bone marrow transplants and solid allo- and xenotransplants. Immunoregulatory activity by the anti-hypercholesterolemia agents, 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl Coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, known as statins, has recently been reported. We analyzed the effects of three statins on human NK cell cytotoxicity. Two lipophilic statins (simvastatin and fluvastatin) suppressed the cytotoxic activity of fresh and IL-2-stimulated NK cells, while pravastatin, a hydrophilic statin, did not. Suppression was not associated with changes in intracellular perforin, granzyme A or granzyme B levels, or with changes in expression of leukocyte function-associated antigen-1, an integrin known to regulate NK activity and reported to be altered by statin treatment. Decreased cytotoxicity was associated with decreased CD107a surface expression, indicating that the exocytosis pathway was compromised by simvastatin and fluvastatin but not by pravastatin. Mevalonate, the immediate downstream product of HMG-CoA reductase, partially reversed the effect of lipophilic statins on cytotoxicity and CD107a expression. Lipophilic statins also suppressed the release of the granule component, granzyme B, by IL-2-activated NK cells following stimulation with K562. That lipophilic statins suppress NK cell activity through inhibition of the exocytosis pathway suggest an additional potential role for statins in inhibition of transplantation responses.

Cell Line↗
PubMed2006

Association between the dosage and duration of statin treatment with coronary collateral development.

BACKGROUND: The coronary collateral circulation is an alternative source of blood supply to myocardium in the presence of advanced coronary artery disease and the therapeutic promotion of collateral growth appears to be a valuable treatment strategy in these patients. Although it has been shown in in-vivo studies that 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) promote vasculogenesis and accelerate coronary collateral development in ischemic tissues, there are discordant results in clinical studies. Our aim was to investigate the effect of statin therapy, including dosage and duration of treatment, on coronary collateral growth in patients with advanced coronary artery disease. METHODS: Study population consisted of 400 (306 men, with the mean age of 62+/-10 years) consecutive patients who have undergone clinically indicated coronary angiography and had at least one major coronary artery stenosis of > or =95%. Coronary collaterals were graded from 0 to 3 according to the Cohen-Rentrop method and patients with grade 0-1 collateral development were regarded as having poor collateral and patients with grade 2-3 collateral development were regarded as having good collateral. RESULTS: Among 400 patients, 196 (48%) were on statin therapy. Patients with good collateral score were more likely to have stable angina pectoris as clinical presentation (P<0.001), and were on statin therapy (P=0.001), and have multivessel disease (P=0.003). Statin therapy for less than 3 months had no effect on collateral development (P=0.19); however, patients who were on statin therapy for more than 3 months had significantly better collateral development (P=0.002). Statin therapy had no effect on coronary collateral development in patients having <10 mg atorvastatin-equivalent dose (P=0.13); however, patients having > or =10 mg atorvastatin-equivalent dose had better collateral development (P<0.001). Diabetes mellitus was the only negative predictor for coronary collateral formation (P=0.03). On multivariate analysis, stable angina pectoris [odds ratio 2.88, 95% confidence interval (1.8-4.7), P<0.001], statin therapy with > or =10 mg atorvastatin-equivalent dose [odds ratio 2.06, 95% confidence interval (1.3-2.6), P<0.001] and having multivessel disease [odds ratio 1.86, 95% confidence interval (1.16-3), P=0.01] were found to be associated with rich collateralization. CONCLUSION: Statin therapy (> or =10 mg atorvastatin-equivalent dose), stable angina pectoris and having multivessel disease are associated with enhanced coronary collateral development in patients with advanced coronary artery disease.

Collateral Circulation↗
PubMed2002

The myotoxicity of statins.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Since hypercholesterolaemia is a chronic condition, the long-term safety of statins is important. Adverse reactions involving skeletal muscle are the most common (reported incidence 1-7%). The recent withdrawal of cerivastatin because of deaths from rhabdomyolysis, of which 25% were related to gemfibrozil-cerivastatin combination therapy, has focused attention on myotoxicity associated with statins and in particular with statin-fibrate combinations. We review the safety profiles of the individual statins, and discuss the mechanisms that may account for myotoxicity associated with statins and these agents and how these may relate to the different myotoxic potential of individual agents. RECENT FINDINGS: The statins, particularly the first-generation agents, have been well evaluated from the perspective of safety and efficacy. Cerivastatin was associated with a 10-fold higher incidence of myotoxicity than any other statin, suggesting that there may be differences in myotoxic potential between agents. Statin-associated myotoxicity is complex, involving effects on cell membrane structure and function, mitochondrial dysfunction and impaired myocyte duplication. Potential differences in myotoxicity between agents may relate to the physicochemical, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of individual drugs. The aetiology of myotoxicity associated with statin-fibrate combination therapy is complex and multifactorial, with recent studies suggesting that there may be differences in myotoxic potential between individual fibrates. SUMMARY: Recent evidence suggests that there may be differences in myotoxic potential between individual agents. Thus, the choice of hypolipidaemic therapy needs to be based not only on outcome evidence and cost-effectiveness analysis, but also on safety considerations for individual agents.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗
PubMed2005

Statin therapy in heart failure.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme-A reductase inhibitors, or statins, have been shown to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among a wide spectrum of patients with established atherosclerotic vascular disease. Mounting experimental and clinical evidence also suggest a potential benefit as well as theoretical harm of statin therapy in patients with heart failure. RECENT FINDINGS: This article briefly summarizes the therapeutic properties of statins that may be of benefit to patients with heart failure and the theoretical adverse effects of cholesterol reduction in this group of patients. A number of nonrandomized clinical studies over the past several years have shown an association between statin use and reduced overall mortality. Several large-scale randomized studies designed to confirm these findings are currently under way. SUMMARY: Statin therapy appears to improve clinical outcomes in patients with both ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy independently of their cholesterol-lowering properties. The theoretical adverse properties of statins in heart failure patients have not been substantiated in small to medium-sized clinical trials. Although the encouraging results of these preliminary studies suggest a role for statin therapy in heart failure, larger studies are needed to validate these findings. Several ongoing randomized trials are currently under way to evaluate the effect of statin therapy on cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure patients. The results of these studies, expected in the next several years, should provide scientific evidence for the role of statins in the treatment of failure.

Cardiac Output, Low↗
PubMed2026

HLA and non-HLA genetic analyses reveal suggestive variants associated with statin-induced liver injury.

BACKGROUND: Statins are widely prescribed for cardiovascular risk reduction and are generally well tolerated. However, they can cause drug-induced liver injury (DILI), and the genetic factors contributing to statin-DILI remain poorly understood. METHODS: HLA association and genome-wide association (GWAS) studies were conducted to identify genetic variants associated with statin-DILI. High-confidence cases (n=71) were identified from the Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) and compared with statin-exposed controls without liver injury (n=551) from the Indiana Biobank. Association testing was performed across ancestries and within ancestry, adjusting for age, sex, and three principal components of genotypes. Top variants were further evaluated in non-statin DILI cases and unexposed controls. In addition, we investigated the frequency of candidate variants among a comprehensive list of pharmacogenetic variants related to statins. RESULTS: HLA-DQA1*03:01 was significantly associated with increased risk of statin-DILI (OR=3.49, 95% CI 2.21-5.51, p-value=1.27&#xd7;10-7), with enrichment observed across multiple ancestry groups, particularly non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic individuals. From the GWAS, three loci showed suggestive associations (p-value <5&#xd7;10-06) with statin-DILI, including rs35197737 in RGS1 (OR=5.03, 95% CI 1.11-3.66, p=1.14&#xd7;10-7), rs75629598 in FRMD4A (OR=4.4, 95% CI=2.33-8.12, p=3.97&#xd7;10-6), and rs7658630 in the intergenic region on chromosome 4 (OR=4.86, 95% CI 2.66-8.85, p=2.68&#xd7;10-7). No pharmacogenetic variants revealed statistical significance. CONCLUSION: We identified HLA and non-HLA genetic variants associated with statin DILI. Future studies with larger sample sizes should confirm these observations.

Humans↗
PubMed2004

Meta-analysis of large randomized controlled trials to evaluate the impact of statins on cardiovascular outcomes.

AIMS: Since 2002, there have been five major outcome trials of statins reporting findings from more than 47,000 subjects. As individual trial results differed, we performed a meta-analysis to ascertain the effectiveness and safety of statins overall and in subgroups. The aim of the study was to estimate the effect of statins on major coronary events and strokes, all-cause mortality and noncardiovascular mortality, and in different subgroups. METHODS: PubMed was searched for trials published in English. Randomized placebo-controlled statin trials with an average follow up of at least 3 years and at least 100 major coronary events were included. For each trial, the statin used, number and type of subjects, proportion of women, mean age and follow up, baseline and change in lipid profile, cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Ten trials involving 79,494 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. Due to heterogeneity, ALLHAT-LLT was excluded from some analyses. Statin therapy reduced major coronary events by 27% (95%CI 23, 30%), stroke by 18% (95%CI 10, 25%) and all-cause mortality by 15% (95%CI 8, 21%). There was a 4% (95%CI -10, 3%) nonsignificant reduction in noncardiovascular mortality. The reduction in major coronary events is independent of gender and presence of hypertension or diabetes. The risk reduction was greater in smokers (P < 0.05). Coronary events were reduced by 23% (95%CI 18, 29%) in pravastatin trials and 29% (95%CI 25, 33%) in five trials using other statins. Pravastatin reduced strokes by 12% (95%CI 1, 21%) whilst other statins reduced strokes by 24% (95%CI 16, 32%) (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Statins reduce coronary events, strokes and all-cause mortality without increasing noncoronary mortality. The benefits accrue in men and women, hypertensives and normotensives, diabetics and nondiabetics, and particularly in smokers. Pravastatin appears to have less impact on strokes.

Coronary Disease↗