Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Simvastatin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

Influences of pravastatin and simvastatin, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, on myocardial stunning in dogs.

We examined the effects of pravastatin and simvastatin, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, on stunned myocardium in vivo. Pravastatin and simvastatin were given orally 2 mg/kg for 3 weeks. After 3 weeks of administration, pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs were subjected to 15-min left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery occlusion followed by 2-h reperfusion. Myocardial segment function was determined by sonomicrometry. The tissue energy and carbohydrate metabolites were determined in the 2-h-reperfused hearts. Administration of pravastatin and simvastatin for 3 weeks decreased serum cholesterol level and blood pressure (BP). Simvastatin resulted in a worsening of segment shortening in the reperfused myocardium as compared with control and pravastatin groups. The level of ATP in the simvastatin group was significantly lower as compared with that in the control group. The other metabolite levels were not significantly altered by either pravastatin or simvastatin. These results suggest that simvastatin enhances stunning of the myocardium in association with ATP reduction after reperfusion subsequent to ischemia.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗
PubMed2000

Simvastatin attenuates vascular hypercoagulability in cardiac transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors have been shown to reduce cardiac allograft failure and to lower the incidence of transplant coronary artery disease. These effects result from as yet unknown mechanisms not clearly attributable to lipid lowering. We here report that low-dose simvastatin treatment inhibits excessive expression of monocyte tissue factor (TF) and reduces the persistent hypercoagulability state seen in cardiac transplant recipients. METHODS: Fifteen consecutive heart transplant recipients receiving standard oral immunosuppression were newly assigned to a 10 mg daily simvastatin therapy. Levels of TF activity in both unstimulated and lipopolysaccharide-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells drawn from transplant recipients before and under simvastatin therapy were evaluated by one-stage clotting assay. RESULTS: Monocyte TF activity was found to be significantly increased in cardiac transplant recipients when compared with healthy controls. Excessive monocyte procoagulant activity was reduced in cardiac transplant recipients during simvastatin treatment. This effect occurred independently of the reduction of serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. As demonstrated by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, monocyte TF reduction by simvastatin, observed in 13 of the 15 transplant recipients investigated, could be ascribed to an inhibition of monocyte TF gene transcription. The reduction of monocyte TF activity during treatment with simvastatin paralleled with the normalization of elevated levels of thrombin-antithrombin complex, prothrombin fragment F1+2, and D-dimer, which are markers of thrombin and fibrin formation indicating coagulation activation after cardiac transplantation. CONCLUSION: Inhibition of monocyte TF expression and attenuation of the persistent hypercoagulable state observed in cardiac transplant recipients during treatment with simvastatin may represent an important mechanism by which HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors protect against the development of transplant coronary artery disease.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Treating hypercholesterolaemia with HMG CoA reductase inhibitors: a direct comparison of simvastatin and pravastatin.

BACKGROUND: Simvastatin and pravastatin are both competitive inhibitors of the rate limiting enzyme for cholesterol biosynthesis (HMG CoA) reductase, but data from individual clinical trials suggest significant differences in potency for cholesterol reduction between the two drugs. AIM: To assess any differences in efficacy and safety between simvastatin and pravastatin in a direct, comparative study. METHODS: A double-blind, double-dummy, randomised study design was used, involving 48 patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia. Following a 6 week placebo baseline period, patients were randomly allocated to treatment with either simvastatin or pravastatin, commencing at a dose of 10 mg daily. The dose levels were titrated up to the recommended maximum effective dose of 40 mg daily at 6 weekly intervals if LDL cholesterol levels remained > or = 3.4 mmol/L. After 18 weeks of therapy, all patients were transferred to simvastatin therapy for a further 6 weeks, continuing at their week 18 dose level. Patients complied with a standard lipid lowering diet (containing < 30% of energy as total fat) throughout the study period. RESULTS: Over the 18 week direct comparison of the two drugs, there was a significant difference (p < 0.001) in response between simvastatin and pravastatin for reduction in levels of total cholesterol (32% vs 21% respectively), LDL cholesterol (38% vs 27%) and apolipoprotein B levels (34% vs 23%). No significant difference in drug effect was seen for the small reduction in levels of apolipoprotein AI (5% vs 6% respectively), nor for the increased levels of apolipoprotein AII (14% vs 11%) and HDL cholesterol (11% vs 7%). Lp(a) levels remained unchanged. When pravastatin was replaced with simvastatin for the final 6 weeks of the study in the 23 patients initially randomised to pravastatin, there were further reductions (p < 0.01) in total and LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B. These results establish the advantage of simvastatin over pravastatin in terms of efficacy, for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Liver-specific distribution of rosuvastatin in rats: comparison with pravastatin and simvastatin.

Rosuvastatin is a new 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor. The liver is the target organ for the lipid-regulating effect of rosuvastatin; therefore liver-selective uptake of this drug is a desirable property. The aim of this study was to investigate, and compare with pravastatin and simvastatin, the tissue-specific distribution of rosuvastatin. Bolus intravenous doses (5 mg/kg) of radiolabeled rosuvastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin were administered to rats, and initial uptake clearance (CL(uptake)) in various tissues was calculated. Hepatic CL(uptake) of rosuvastatin (0.885 ml/min/g tissue) was significantly (p < 0.001) larger than that of pravastatin (0.703 ml/min/g tissue), and rosuvastatin was taken up by the hepatic cells more selectively and efficiently than pravastatin. Hepatic CL(uptake) of simvastatin (1.24 ml/min/g tissue) was significantly larger than that of rosuvastatin (p < 0.01) and pravastatin (p < 0.001). However, adrenal CL(uptake) of simvastatin (1.55 ml/min/g tissue) was larger than hepatic CL(uptake), and simvastatin was distributed to other tissues more easily than rosuvastatin. Microautoradiography of the liver, spleen, and adrenal was undertaken 5 min after administration of the study drugs; distribution was quantified by counting the number of silver grains. After administration of rosuvastatin and pravastatin, silver grains were distributed selectively in the intracellular space of the liver, but more rosuvastatin (3.3 +/- 1.0 x 10(5) particles/mm(2)) than pravastatin (2.0 +/- 0.3 x 10(5) particles/mm(2)) tended to distribute to the liver. Simvastatin was less liver-specific (it also distributed to the spleen and adrenal). The results of this study indicated that rosuvastatin was taken up by hepatic cells more selectively and more efficiently than pravastatin and simvastatin.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2000

3 year simvastatin treatment and lens nuclear back scattering.

AIM: To determine if 3 year treatment of hypercholesterolaemia with simvastatin causes an increase of lens nuclear back scattering. METHODS: 160 patients with hypercholesterolaemia in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) were followed for 3 years. Half (80) of the patients took simvastatin and half (80) received placebo. The lens was photographed with a Topcon SL-45 slit lamp camera at the beginning and at 1 year intervals. A common lens nuclear area was used for measuring lens nuclear back scattering. RESULTS: Nuclear back scattering increased with age and there was more pronounced scattering in women than in men. Lens nuclear back scattering did not differ significantly between the simvastatin and placebo groups, but the power was low (0.2). Lens nuclear back scattering increased during the study period independently of baseline back scattering, age, and sex for both groups. CONCLUSION: Although no significant difference was found between the simvastatin and placebo groups, the currently available data are insufficient for exclusion of the possibility that taking simvastatin during a 3 year period increases nuclear back scattering. However, a possible minor increase of nuclear back scattering is clinically irrelevant considering known beneficial effects of simvastatin on coronary heart disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Simvastatin attenuates leucocyte-endothelial interactions after coronary revascularisation with cardiopulmonary bypass.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of preoperative simvastatin treatment on leucocyte-endothelial interactions following coronary artery bypass surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. DESIGN: Double blind crossover study. Experiments on polymorphonuclear cells (neutrophils) were done at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass and one hour postoperatively. Endothelial P-selectin expression and neutrophil/endothelial adhesion were evaluated under either normoxic or hypoxic conditions. SETTING: University hospital (tertiary referral centre). PATIENTS: Three groups of patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery: 20 patients taking simvastatin for cholesterol control, 16 patients not responsive to simvastatin, and 20 controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Expression of neutrophil CD11b and endothelial P-selectin; adhesion of neutrophils to endothelium. RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary bypass resulted in a significant increase in neutrophil CD11b expression in all groups. Similarly, the exposure of saphenous vein to hypoxia/reoxygenation induced an augmentation of endothelial P-selectin. However, both neutrophil CD11b expression and endothelial P-selectin exocytosis were less in the simvastatin groups than in the controls. Cardiopulmonary bypass and controlled hypoxia/reoxygenation stimulated neutrophil/endothelial adhesion, but the number of adhering cells was less in the simvastatin groups than in the controls, irrespective of the cholesterol concentration. Treatment of endothelial cells with L-NAME completely reversed the effects of simvastatin. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment with simvastatin reduces neutrophil adhesion to the venous endothelium in patients undergoing coronary surgery, irrespective of its efficacy at lowering cholesterol concentration.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗
PubMed2002

Simvastatin restores endothelial NO-mediated vasorelaxation in large arteries after myocardial infarction.

Congestive heart failure (CHF) after myocardial infarction is associated with diminished endothelial nitric oxide (NO)-mediated vasorelaxation. The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors have been shown to modulate vascular tone independent of the effects on lipid lowering. We hypothesized that simvastatin restores NO-dependent vasorelaxation with CHF. We found that incubation of the normal rat aorta with 0.1 mM simvastatin for 24 h enhanced ACh-mediated vasorelaxation (P < 0.05). Moreover, simvastatin increased (P < 0.05) endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) protein content by >200% (82.0 +/- 14.0 vs. 21.6 +/- 7.9% II/microg). In cultured endothelial cells, simvastatin (10 and 20 microM) increased eNOS levels by 114.7 +/- 39.9 and 212.0 +/- 75.0% II/microg protein, respectively (both P < 0.05; n = 8). In the rat coronary artery ligation model, oral gavage with 20 mg. kg(-1). day(-1) simvastatin for 3 wk decreased (P < 0.05) mean arterial pressure (121 +/- 20 vs. 96.5 +/- 10.8 mmHg) and left ventricular change in pressure with time (4,500 +/- 700 vs. 4,091 +/- 1,064 mmHg/s, n = 6). Simvastatin reduced (P < 0.05) basal vasoconstriction and improved ACh-mediated vasorelaxation in CHF arterial rings. Inhibition of NO generation by N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (100 microM) abolished the ACh-induced vasorelaxation in all rats. In conclusion, chronic treatment of CHF with simvastatin restores endothelial NO-dependent dysfunction and upregulates eNOS protein content in arterial tissue.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Effects of simvastatin on plasma lipoproteins and response to arterial injury in wild-type and apolipoprotein-E-deficient mice.

OBJECTIVE: To test the non-lipid-lowering effects of simvastatin on the response to injury in normolipidemic and hyperlipidemic mice. METHODS AND RESULTS: Wild-type (WT) mice (n = 40) and hyperlipidemic apolipoprotein-E-deficient (apoE(-/-)) mice (n = 40) received normal chow or chow containing simvastatin 100 mg/kg/day prior to bilateral femoral artery wire injury. Intimal hyperplasia and plasma cholesterol concentration were quantified after 4 weeks. Plasma cholesterol in WT mice treated or untreated with simvastatin was similar (100.9 +/- 6.6 vs. 94.3 +/- 17.5 mg/dl). Simvastatin did not affect intimal hyperplasia. In apoE(-/-) mice, intimal hyperplasia was increased 2.3-fold relative to WT mice (17090 +/- 4998 vs. 39490 +/- 16190; p < 0.001). In apoE(-/- )mice, simvastatin caused a paradoxical increase in plasma cholesterol (1094 +/- 60.3 vs. 658 +/- 66.8 mg/dl; p < 0.001), confirmed by FPLC. This was associated with a further increase in intimal area (39490 +/- 16190 vs. 55420 +/- 22590 mm(2); p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: (1). Simvastatin had no effect on plasma cholesterol or the response to arterial injury in normolipidemic WT mice; (2). hyperlipidemia was associated with markedly increased intimal hyperplasia, and (3). simvastatin treatment of apoE(-/-) mice caused paradoxical hyperlipidemia and increased intimal hyperplasia.

Angioplasty, Balloon↗
PubMed2006

Effect of simvastatin on coronary lesion site remodeling: a serial intravascular ultrasound study.

BACKGROUND: Direct evidence of coronary artery remodeling can be derived only from serial changes in the external elastic membrane (EEM) and plaque area. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of simvastatin on coronary remodeling in serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) studies. METHODS: In 39 male patients ECG-triggered transducer pullback IVUS was performed at baseline, after 3 months on a lipid-lowering diet (control period), and after another 12 months of simvastatin 40 mg/day. The lesion site was the image slice with maximum plaque burden at 3 months. RESULTS: Absolute changes in the EEM area correlated significantly with changes in plaque area during the control period [B = 0.966, r = 0.792 (95% CI 0.71-1.22); p < 0.001] and during simvastatin treatment [B = 0.945, r = 0.822 (95% CI 0.73-1.16); p < 0.001], but there was no significant difference in the slope (delta EEM/delta plaque) between the two time intervals. After 12 months of simvastatin, there was a significant reduction in the lesion EEM area of 4.6% (p = 0.006) and in the lesion plaque area of 5.9% (p < 0.001), but there was no change in reference measurements. As a result, the remodeling index was reduced by simvastatin from 1.01 +/- 0.12 to 0.95 +/- 0.09 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Simvastatin decreases the remodeling index by reducing lesion, but not reference plaque and EEM area. However, simvastatin does not affect direct evidence of remodeling (delta EEM/delta plaque) obtained using serial IVUS studies.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Low-dose simvastatin is a well-tolerated and efficacious cholesterol-lowering agent in ciclosporin-treated kidney transplant recipients: double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in 40 patients.

The high prevalence of hypercholesterolemia in kidney transplant recipients probably contributes to the high cardiovascular mortality in these patients. Except for diet, there is no generally recommended cholesterol-lowering treatment. We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study with low-dose simvastatin in 40 ciclosporin (CS)-treated kidney transplant recipients during 16 weeks, focusing on side effects and dose finding. In the simvastatin group, the mean serum total and LDL cholesterol concentrations decreased by 23 and 33%, respectively, and the mean serum HDL cholesterol concentration increased by 12%, after 4 weeks of treatment with simvastatin 10 mg daily. Increasing the dose to 20 mg daily in a few patients only resulted in marginal further reductions of the serum cholesterol concentrations at the expense of doubling the plasma simvastatin 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitory activity concentrations. The differences between the changes in the serum cholesterol concentrations in the simvastatin group and the negligible changes in the placebo group were statistically significant. There was no case of proximal myopathy and the serum creatine kinase concentrations did not differ between treatment groups. In conclusion, low-dose simvastatin appears to be a well tolerated and efficacious cholesterol-lowering treatment in CS-treated kidney transplant recipients. Simvastatin 10 mg daily seems to be the most suitable dose for the majority of these patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Early antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory effects of simvastatin versus fenofibrate in patients with hypercholesterolemia.

The aim of the study was to determine whether a short-term treatment with simvastatin or fenofibrate may result in beneficial anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic effects in patients with high risk of coronary artery disease. In a randomized, double-blind study, we compared markers of inflammation, thrombin formation and platelet activation in patients with LDL cholesterol >130 mg/dl assigned to receive simvastatin (40 mg/d; n=20) or micronised fenofibrate (160 mg/d; n=22) for 28 days. Simvastatin, but not fenofibrate, lowered C-reactive protein (CRP) by 32% on day 3 (p<0.001), while both drugs reduced CRP significantly on day 28. Interleukin-6, soluble CD40 ligand, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 levels decreased significantly (by 20 to 50%) in both treatment groups on days 3 and 28. Soluble cell adhesion molecules remained unchanged in both groups. Simvastatin and fenofibrate significantly lowered plasma concentrations of thrombin-antithrombin complexes on days 3 and 28, but not platelet beta-thromboglobulin (betaTG) levels. Soluble P-selectin was lowered only in the simvastatin group. The total amount of thrombin generated at the site of microvascular injury also declined (by about 30%) as early as after 3 days of fenofibrate or simvastatin therapy, whereas beta TG release was reduced only in the simvastatin group on days 3 and 28. All the effects were independent of the changes in lipid profiles. Our results suggest that statins and fibrates can exert antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory effects as early as after 3 days of therapy. However, in contrast to statins, fibrates have no influence on platelet function within one month of therapy.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗
PubMed1999

Simvastatin inhibits leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions and protects against inflammatory processes in normocholesterolemic rats.

Simvastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, has been shown to lower serum cholesterol levels and normalize endothelial cell function. Moreover, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors exert beneficial effects in coronary artery and cerebrovascular diseases. We examined the effects of simvastatin on leukocyte-endothelial cell interaction in vivo by intravital microscopy. Simvastatin (12.5 or 25 microg per rat) was given 18 hours before study. Superfusion with the NO synthase inhibitor N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 50 micromol/L) significantly increased leukocyte rolling from 12+/-2 to 60+/-8 leukocytes per minute, increased adherence to the mesenteric endothelium from 1.8+/-0.5 to 17+/-1.2 leukocytes per 100 microm of venular length, and raised leukocyte transmigration from 2.5+/-1.0 to 10+/-2 leukocytes per perivessel area (P<0.01). Similar results were obtained with thrombin (0.5 U/mL) superfusion of the mesentery. In contrast, pretreatment with simvastatin (25 microg per rat IP) significantly attenuated L-NAME-stimulated leukocyte rolling, to 12+/-2 (P<0.01); adherence, to 5+/-0.5 leukocytes per 100 microm (P<0.01); and leukocyte transmigration, to 3.5+/-1.5 leukocytes per perivessel area (P<0.01). Similar results were obtained in thrombin-superfused mesenteries. Moreover, immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated significantly increased P-selectin expression on the mesenteric venular endothelium after superfusion with either L-NAME (P<0.01) or thrombin (P<0.01), which was significantly attenuated by simvastatin. These results clearly demonstrate that simvastatin is a potent and effective endothelium-protective agent that reduces leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions independently of its well-known lipid-lowering effects. This effect was found to be at least partially mediated via downregulation of P-selectin expression on the microvascular endothelium. Thus, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors like simvastatin have important anti-inflammatory effects besides their well-known lipid-lowering action.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe coadministered with atorvastatin or simvastatin in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: Patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) have a high incidence of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality from premature atherosclerosis, and the efficacy of pharmacological therapy has been limited. We evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ezetimibe, a novel cholesterol absorption inhibitor, in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial of HoFH patients receiving atorvastatin or simvastatin. Methods and Results- Fifty patients with a diagnosis of HoFH on the National Cholesterol Education Program Step 1 or stricter diet and taking open-label atorvastatin 40 mg/d or simvastatin 40 mg/d (statin-40) with (n=25) or without (n=25) concomitant LDL apheresis were randomized to 1 of 3 double-blind treatments: atorvastatin or simvastatin 80 mg/d (statin-80, n=17); ezetimibe 10 mg/d plus atorvastatin or simvastatin 40 mg/d (n=16); or ezetimibe 10 mg/d plus atorvastatin or simvastatin 80 mg/d (n=17) for 12 weeks. The primary end point was mean percentage change in LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) from statin-40 baseline to the end point for patients receiving statins alone (statin-80) versus patients receiving ezetimibe plus atorvastatin or simvastatin at either dose (ezetimibe plus statin-40/80). Ezetimibe plus statin-40/80 significantly reduced LDL-C levels compared with statin-80 (-20.7% versus -6.7%, P=0.007). In the high-dose statin cohorts, ezetimibe plus statin-80 reduced LDL-C by an additional 20.5% (P=0.0001) versus statin-80. Similar significant reductions in LDL-C concentrations were observed for patients with genotype-confirmed HoFH (n=35). Ezetimibe was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Ezetimibe coadministered with atorvastatin or simvastatin in patients with HoFH produced clinically important LDL-C reductions compared with best current therapy. Ezetimibe provides a new, complementary pharmacological approach for this high-risk population.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Simvastatin reduces neointimal thickening in low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice after experimental angioplasty without changing plasma lipids.

BACKGROUND: Statins exert antiinflammatory and antiproliferative actions independent of cholesterol lowering. To determine whether these actions might affect neointimal formation, we investigated the effect of simvastatin on the response to experimental angioplasty in LDL receptor-deficient (LDLR-/-) mice, a model of hypercholesterolemia in which changes in plasma lipids are not observed in response to simvastatin. METHODS AND RESULTS: Carotid artery dilation (2.5 atm) and complete endothelial denudation were performed in male C57BL/6J LDLR-/- mice treated with low-dose (2 mg/kg) or high-dose (20 mg/kg) simvastatin or vehicle subcutaneously 72 hours before and then daily after injury. After 7 and 28 days, intimal and medial sizes were measured and the intima to media area ratio (I:M) was calculated. Total plasma cholesterol and triglyceride levels were similar in simvastatin- and vehicle-treated mice. Intimal thickening and I:M were reduced significantly by low- and high-dose simvastatin compared with vehicle alone. Simvastatin treatment was associated with reduced cellular proliferation (BrdU), leukocyte accumulation (CD45), and platelet-derived growth factor-induced phosphorylation of the survival factor Akt and increased apoptosis after injury. CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin modulates vascular repair after injury in the absence of lipid-lowering effects. Although the mechanisms are not yet established, additional research may lead to new understanding of the actions of statins and novel therapeutic interventions for preventing restenosis.

Angioplasty↗
PubMed2002

Simvastatin lowers C-reactive protein within 14 days: an effect independent of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction.

BACKGROUND: The early response of C-reactive protein to initiation of a hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin) is not known. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate at which highly sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels change after initiation of simvastatin and whether this occurs independently of the change in LDL cholesterol. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study was a crossover, double-blind design including 40 subjects with elevated LDL cholesterol. Subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: simvastatin 40 mg for 14 days, then placebo for 14 days, or placebo first, then simvastatin. Simvastatin decreased LDL cholesterol by 56+/-4 mg/dL (P<0.0001) at day 7 and by an additional 8+/-3 mg/dL (P=0.02) at day 14. Baseline log(hsCRP) levels were similar in the 2 groups. By day 14, log(hsCRP) was significantly lower in patients on simvastatin when compared with placebo (P=0.011). Although there was no significant difference in fibrinogen levels, simvastatin produced a modest increase in log[lipoprotein(a)] (P=0.03) at days 7 and 14. There were no relationships between the decrease in LDL cholesterol and the decrease in hsCRP. CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin lowers hsCRP by 14 days, independent of its effect on LDL cholesterol. This rapid impact of a statin on hsCRP has potential implications in the management of acute coronary syndromes.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin profoundly improves survival in a murine model of sepsis.

BACKGROUND: HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, such as simvastatin, have been shown to exhibit pronounced immunomodulatory effects independent of lipid lowering but to date have not been used to treat severe inflammatory disease such as sepsis. We thus approached the question of whether treatment with simvastatin might improve cardiovascular function and survival in sepsis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Mice treated with simvastatin and rendered septic by cecal ligation and perforation (CLP) show a mean survival time close to 4 times the value found in untreated mice. This dramatic improvement is based on a complete preservation of cardiac function and hemodynamic status, which are severely impaired in untreated CLP mice [eg, 20 hours after CLP, cardiac output declined from 1.24+/-0.09 to 0.87+/-0.11 mL x min(-1) x g(-1) in untreated mice (P<0.005; n=12), while remaining unaltered (1.21+/-0.08 mL x min(-1) x g(-1) at baseline and 1.15+/-0.1 mL x min(-1) x g(-1) 20 hours after CLP, P=NS, n=12) in CLP mice treated with simvastatin]. Untreated CLP mice remained refractory to beta-stimulation, whereas the responsiveness to dobutamine was restored by treatment with simvastatin. Susceptibility of coronary flow to endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) stimulation by bradykinin was close to 3 times as pronounced in untreated CLP mice as in untreated sham-operated mice, indicating a high level of eNOS activation secondary to sepsis. In addition, treatment with simvastatin reversed inflammatory alterations in CLP mice, namely, increased monocyte adhesion to endothelium. CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin, which is well established in the treatment of lipid disorders and coronary artery disease, might have the additional potential of being an effective agent in sepsis treatment.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Additive beneficial effects of losartan combined with simvastatin in the treatment of hypercholesterolemic, hypertensive patients.

BACKGROUND: Biological mechanisms underlying statin and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker therapies differ. Therefore, we compared vascular and metabolic responses to these therapies either alone or in combination in hypercholesterolemic, hypertensive patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial with 3 treatment arms (each 2 months) and 2 washout periods (each 2 months). Forty-seven hypertensive, hypercholesterolemic patients were given simvastatin 20 mg and placebo, simvastatin 20 mg and losartan 100 mg, or losartan 100 mg and placebo daily during each 2-month treatment period. Losartan alone or combined therapy significantly reduced blood pressure compared with simvastatin alone. Compared with losartan alone, simvastatin alone or combined therapy significantly changed lipoproteins. All 3 treatment arms significantly improved flow-mediated dilator response to hyperemia and decreased plasma malondialdehyde and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 levels relative to baseline measurements. However, these parameters were changed to a greater extent with combined therapy compared with simvastatin or losartan alone (both P<0.001 and P=0.030 for monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 by ANOVA). Combined therapy or losartan alone significantly increased plasma adiponectin levels and insulin sensitivity (determined by QUICKI) relative to baseline measurements. These changes were significantly greater than in the group treated with simvastatin alone (P<0.001 for adiponectin, P=0.029 for QUICKI by ANOVA). CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin combined with losartan improves endothelial function and reduces inflammatory markers to a greater extent than monotherapy with either drug in hypercholesterolemic, hypertensive patients.

Adiponectin↗
PubMed1999

Simvastatin preserves the ischemic-reperfused myocardium in normocholesterolemic rat hearts.

BACKGROUND: Ischemia followed by reperfusion in the presence of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) results in cardiac contractile dysfunction as well as cardiomyocyte injury. These deleterious effects are due in large part to endothelial dysfunction leading to the upregulation of cell adhesion molecules and subsequent neutrophil-endothelium interaction. At clinically relevant doses, simvastatin, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, has been shown to lower serum cholesterol levels and normalize endothelial cell function. We wanted to test the effects of simvastatin on neutrophil-mediated cardiac dysfunction in a controlled model of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study examines the effects of simvastatin in a neutrophil-dependent isolated perfused rat heart model of ischemia (I) (20 minutes) and reperfusion (R) (45 minutes) injury. Administration of simvastatin 25 micrograms/rat improved coronary flow and preserved left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) and dP/dtmax, indexes of cardiac contractile function. Final LVDP was 95+/-5 mm Hg in I/R hearts perfused with PMNs and simvastatin, compared with 49+/-4 mm Hg in PMN-perfused I/R hearts receiving only vehicle (P<0.001). In addition, simvastatin significantly reduced PMN accumulation in the ischemic myocardium (P<0.01). In PMN-perfused rat hearts after I/R, simvastatin also significantly attenuated P-selectin expression, CD18 upregulation in rat PMNs, and PMN adherence to rat vascular endothelium. Significant, although less potent, effects were obtained with pravastatin. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors are potent and effective cardioprotective agents that inhibit leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions and preserve cardiac contractile function and coronary perfusion after myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Moreover, these effects are unrelated to the cholesterol-lowering action of this agent and appear to be mediated by enhanced endothelial release of NO.

Animals↗