Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Retraction Notice”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17Linked to original sources
PubMed1977

Net activity of phospholipase A2 in brain and the lack of stimulation of the phospholipase A2-acylation stem.

Certain observations reported previously from this laboratory have not proved reproducible. These are (1) the relatively rapid hydrolysis of added phosphatidylcholine by phospholipase A2 of tissue from the cerebral cortex of the guinea pig and (2) the stimulation by 10 micron-noradrenaline and by 1.0nM-cyclic AMP of the phospholipase A2-acylation system of isolated synaptic membranes.

Retraction Notice↗
PubMed2004

Retraction.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Retraction Notice↗
PubMed2002

[Dolasetron reduces pain on injection of propofol].

OBJECTIVE: Pain on injection is a well known side-effect of propofol. The present study was designed to assess the efficacy of dolasetron, a 5-HT 3 -antagonist, in prophylaxis of pain on injection of propofol compared with lidocaine and placebo. METHODS: Prospective, randomised, double-blinded study including 150 patients randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group A received 12.5 mg dolasetron, group B 40 mg lidocaine and group C saline 0.9 % as placebo. After occluding the venous drainage the test medication was given. The occlusion was released after 1 min and 2.0 mg/kg Propofol was administered over a period of 30 sec. The patients were asked whether they felt any pain during the administration. Pain on injection was judged by using a four-point scale. RESULTS: Incidence of pain on injection as well as the severity of pain was significantly reduced by lidocaine (62 % pain free) compared with placebo (28 %). Severity, but not incidence of pain on injection was significantly reduced by dolasetron (50 %) compared with placebo. There was no significant difference between dolasetron and lidocaine. CONCLUSION: Dolasetron and lidocaine were effective in preventing pain of injection secondary to propofol.

English Abstract↗
PubMed2003

[Influence of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on the natriuretic peptides ANP and BNP. A comparison between long and short duration of CPB and off pump surgery].

OBJECTIVE: Plasma atrial and brain natriuretic peptide (ANP and BNP) are cardiac hormones secreted mainly due to cardiac overload. The study was designed to assess plasma concentrations of ANP and BNP in patients undergoing coronary bypass grafting (CABG) with long and short duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and without CPB (off-pump surgery). METHODS: We studied 45 patients scheduled for elective CABG. Patients were allocated in three groups: group A received CPB with a duration less than 60 minutes, group B more than 60 minutes and patients without CPB were allocated in group C. ANP and BNP were measured after induction of anaesthesia (T0), at the end of surgery (T1), 4 hrs. (T2), 24 hrs. (T3) and 120 hrs. postoperatively (T4). RESULTS: In all groups, ANP-levels increased from T0 to T4 (group A: from 3.7 +/- 2.1 to 8.9 +/- 8.0; group B: from 3.3 +/- 1.7 to 8.0 +/- 6.0; group C: from 3.0 +/- 1.6 to 5.3 +/- 2.3 pg/ml), but there were no significant differences between the groups. BNP-concentrations increased also from T0 to T4 (group A: from 34 +/- 18 to 234 +/- 164; group B: from 33 +/- 26 to 219 +/- 182; group C: from 33 +/- 24 to 77 +/- 55 pg/ml). Furthermore we measured significant higher BNP-levels in group B compared to group C at T3 and T4. No significant differences between group A and B were found. CONCLUSIONS: CPB influenced BNP, but not ANP plasma concentrations. An influence of the duration of CPB on ANP and BNP was not seen.

English Abstract↗
PubMed2003

[Injection pain secondary to propofol-MCT/LCT and propofol-LCT--comparison of prophylaxis with lidocaine].

OBJECTIVE: Pain on injection is one of the most described side-effects of the intravenous application of propofol. This study was designed to assess the efficacy of lidocaine 40 mg in preventing incidence and severity of injection pain for two different propofol solvents. METHODS: In a double-blind and prospective study 202 patients were enrolled and randomized to 4 different groups: group A receiving 2 ml NaCl 0.9 % and propofol-LCT (Disoprivan; AstraZeneca), group B 40 mg lidocaine and propofol-LCT, group C received 2 ml NaCl 0.9 % and propofol-MCT/LCT (Propofol-Lipuro, B. Braun Melsungen AG) and group D 40 mg lidocaine and propofol-MCT/LCT. According to the protocol, all patients were cannulated with a 18-G venous cannula at the dorsum of the hand and no other medicament was injected before the study drug. Time interval between test agents and propofol application in a dosage of 2 mg/kg was one minute. Severity of pain was evaluated during propofol injection over 30 seconds until loss of consciousness using a 4-point rating scale. RESULTS: The incidence of injection pain did not differ between propofol-LCT and propofol-MCT/LCT (64 % and 53 %). Propofol-MCT/LCT significantly reduced the severity of pain compared to propofol-LCT (p < 0.05). The application of lidocaine resulted in a significant reduction in incidence (Propofol-MCT/LCT: 16 %; Propofol-LCT: 31 %) and severity of injection pain compared to placebo. CONCLUSION: Propofol-MCT/LCT showed a significant advantage compared to propofol-LCT considering the severity of injection pain, but not in reducing the incidence of pain. The use of lidocaine resulted in a significant reduction of incidence and severity of injection pain for both propofol solvents.

English Abstract↗