Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Rectal Absorption”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Pharmacokinetics of cisapride in horses after intravenous and rectal administration.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the i.v. pharmacokinetics of cisapride and measure systemic absorption after rectal administration. ANIMALS: 5 healthy adult mares (380 to 610 kg). PROCEDURE: Cisapride was administered, i.v., at a dosage of 0.1 mg/kg of body weight. In the same horses, after a 1-week washout period, cisapride was administered rectally at a dosage of 1 mg/kg by mixing crushed tablets with propylene glycol and administering the mixture into the rectum. After each drug administration, a series of blood samples were collected. Plasma was obtained and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography to determine cisapride concentration profiles after each drug administration. RESULTS: After i.v. administration, peak plasma concentration was 221.4 ng/ml and harmonic mean half-life was 1.9 hours. Rectal absorption of cisapride was negligible. Cisapride was detected in plasma from only 3 of 5 horses for which mean systemic availability was 1.23%. Mean maximal plasma concentration after rectal administration of cisapride was 13.5 ng/ml. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: After i.v. administration of cisapride, plasma concentration is high for approximately 2 hours. Cisapride mixed with propylene glycol and administered rectally at a dosage of 1 mg/kg is poorly and incompletely absorbed. Thus, cisapride is not clinically useful for rectal administration in horses.

Absorption↗
PubMed1990

Topical effects of absorption enhancing agents on the rectal mucosa of rats in vivo.

In the present study, attempts have been made to assess the effects of cefoxitin formulations with various absorption promoters on mucosal integrity after rectal delivery in rats. Observations were made at 2 and 24 h following drug administration. On macroscopic and histologic evaluation, all drug formulations affected mucosal structure in terms of hyperemia, edema, loss of goblet cell vacuoles, detachment of enterocytes, and increase of the number of inflammatory cells; these effects were not reversible in 24 h. The effects of formulations with MGK (a mixture of glyceryl-1-monooctanoate, glyceryl-1,2-dioctanoate, glyceryl-1,3-dioctanoate, glyceryl trioctanoate, glycerol, and octanoic acid), monoglycerides, 3-amino-1-hydroxypropylidene-1,1-diphosphonate, and 4% (w/v) sodium tauro-24,25-dihydrofusidate (STDHF) tended to exceed those observed with sodium salicylate, medium-chain fatty acids, Azone, and lower STDHF concentrations. The clinically used suppository bases Witepsol H15 and PEG 1540/6000 and indomethacin suppositories also affected mucosal structure. Although the interanimal variability in scores was very substantial, results indicate that rectal absorption enhancement is associated with modification of paracellular transport after detachment of enterocytes. However, the extent of drug absorption enhancement appeared not to be directly related to the extent of mucosal damage.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed1997

Failure of absorption of baclofen after rectal administration.

We wished to determine the degree to which baclofen was absorbed from an aqueous vehicle after rectal administration. A comparison was made to absorption after oral administration. After oral administration, the baclofen half-life was 2.3 to 3.4 hours and peak serum concentrations were achieved from 1 to 2.1 hours after administration. No measurable absorption was observed after rectal administration of the drug in any subject. Rectal administration of baclofen is not a clinically sound treatment option when oral administration of the drug is not possible. For patients receiving chronic baclofen therapy, other medications such as a benzodiazepine should be considered at times when oral administration of medication is not possible.

Absorption↗
PubMed1997

Absorption kinetics of rectal formalin instillation.

Formalin instillation has become an accepted treatment of radiation-induced hemorrhagic cystitis and proctitis since the initial report by Brown in 1969 (Med. J. Aust. 1:23, 1969). Although its use is widespread, no studies have been performed to determine the safest, volume or duration of formalin exposure. The purpose of our study was to determine the optimum technique for instillation and the safety margin regarding the maximum time that formalin can be in contact with the rectal mucosa without causing serum toxicity. In a pilot canine study, 4% neutral buffered formalin was instilled into the rectum in 30 ml aliquots for 60 seconds each after which each aliquot was withdrawn; a total volume of 400 ml was used. Our subsequent experiment involved rectal instillation of a single formalin bolus of 100 ml for 1 hour without removal during this time. Formalin metabolites were measured in the blood and urine to assess toxicity. Results indicate that with the latter technique serum formic acid reaches toxic levels within 15 minutes of instillation and may stay elevated for several hours. Metabolites in the urine similarly increase within 15 minutes, lagging only shortly behind the rise in serum levels. Performing formalin instillation in a series of 30 ml aliquots appears to be a safer treatment, as toxic serum levels were not reached and their slight rise above baseline returned to normal within 3 hours.

Administration, Rectal↗
PubMed1997

Failure of absorption of gabapentin after rectal administration.

PURPOSE: We wished to determine the extent of absorption of gabapentin (GBP) after rectal administration to children on maintenance therapy. METHODS: Two children scheduled for extensive surgery received GBP rectally and orally. A pharmacokinetic profile was derived after each route of administration. RESULTS: Serum GBP levels after rectal administration decreased at a rate similar to their rate of decrease after oral administration. However, GBP concentrations were much lower after rectal administration; therefore, we concluded that the aqueous solution was poorly absorbed rectally. The GBP half-life (t1/2) for the 2 children after oral doses were 4.2 and 4.8 h. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal administration of GBP is not satisfactory when oral administration is interrupted. When oral GBP therapy is temporarily discontinued, clinicians should consider administration of alternative antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) that can be administered parenterally or rectally.

Acetates↗
PubMed1990

Absorption kinetics of oral and rectal flecainide in healthy subjects.

UNLABELLED: The absorption kinetics of different pharmaceutical formulations of orally and rectally administered flecainide have been assessed in a cross-over study in 7 healthy volunteers. The subjects received single doses of flecainide after a washout period of at least one week. A tablet, an oral solution, a rectal solution and a 10 min i.v. infusion during 10 min each containing 100 mg flecainide were administered to the subjects in a randomized order. The mean absolute bioavailability was 98%, 78% and 81% for the rectal and oral solutions and the tablet. The lag time after administration of the oral solution was 0.33 h and it was 0.86 h after the tablet and 0.18 h after the rectal solution. The mean time to the peak serum concentration (tmax) after the rectal solution (0.67 h) was shorter than after either the tablet (4 h) or oral solution (1 h). The maximum serum concentration (Cmax) was 0.29 mg.l-1 after the rectal solution, 0.14 mg.l-1 after the tablet and 0.17 mg.l-1 after the oral solution. All the volunteers showed significantly higher serum flecainide concentrations during the first 20 min of the absorption phase after rectal administration of 100 mg flecainide as a solution compared to its oral administration. IN CONCLUSION: based on the absolute bioavailability, Cmax, tmax, and lag times, rectal administration of flecainide solution gave a better absorption profile than after oral tablet or solution.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1989

Absorption of valproic acid suppositories in human volunteers.

The absorption of valproic acid administered by rectal suppository was studied in six male volunteers. Valproic acid was incorporated into a synthetic lipid base in our pharmacy. Each subject received 500 mg of valproic acid by rectal suppository and 500 mg of oral valproate sodium syrup one week apart; 13 blood samples were drawn to determine serum concentrations over 48 hours after administration of each formulation. Significant differences were evident in the amount absorbed, maximum serum concentration, and time to achieve maximum serum concentration between the oral and rectal formulations. Mean absorption after rectal suppository was 80%. Maximum serum concentration was 43.4 mg/L after oral administration and 29.2 mg/L after rectal suppository. The time to achieve maximum serum concentration was 1.0 hour after oral syrup and 3.1 hours after rectal suppository. Absorption of the rectal suppository was consistent and complete within 3 hours. The use of valproate sodium in rectal suppository form can be a more convenient and satisfactory method of administering valproic acid when the oral route is impossible. Dosage increases may be necessary, and serum concentrations should be monitored.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Absorption and safety of rectally administered phenytoin.

Parenteral phenytoin solution (Dilantin) was given rectally three times a day for three days to two beagle dogs. This was well tolerated, with no evidence of mucosal irritation noted either on endoscopic nor on rectal mucosal biopsy. When given in this manner, phenytoin is absorbed to a limited degree in canines. Parenteral phenytoin solution can be safely administered rectally, despite a pH of 12. Further study in normal volunteers is needed to assess the usefulness of this route of administration in situations in which the oral and/or parenteral route of administration is unavailable.

Administration, Rectal↗
PubMed2000

Enhanced absorption of indomethacin after oral or rectal administration of a self-emulsifying system containing indomethacin to rats.

A self-emulsifying system (SES), a mixture of an oil and a surfactant which forms an oil-in-water emulsion, is expected to improve the in vitro drug dissolution and enhance the in vivo drug absorption. In this study, a poorly water-soluble drug, indomethacin (IDM) was incorporated into the SES to increase bioavailability. The SES with 30% of Tween 85 and 70% of ethyl oleate, EO (w/w) was selected as an optimized formulation (high drug loading, low surfactant concentration, and small particle size). After an oral administration of the SES containing IDM and IDM suspension, (IDM was suspended in methyl cellulose), 22.5 mg/kg as IDM, to rats, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measured time in plasma, 12 h (AUC(0-12 h)) was significantly greater (57% increase) in the SES, suggesting that oral absorption of IDM increased significantly by the SES. After a rectal administration of gelatin hollow type suppositories, filled with the SES containing IDM and IDM powder physically mixed with the SES, 22. 5 mg/kg, to rats, the AUC(0-12 h) also increased significantly (41% increase) by the SES, suggesting that rectal absorption of IDM also increased significantly by the SES.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1997

Absorption characteristics of azasetron from rectal and oral routes in rabbits.

The absorption characteristics of azasetron, a serotonin type 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist which is used for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis and nausea, were investigated in rabbits. The serum concentrations of azasetron following rectal administration as a suppository increased rapidly and showed the mean tmax value of 0.18 h. The concentrations were greater after rectal administration than those after oral administration. The absolute bioavailability was significantly different between the rectal, 52.9% and oral doses, 21.6%. The mean Cmax and tmax values after the rectal dose were 904.8 ng/ml and 0.18 h, respectively, whereas those after the oral dose averaged 124.7 ng/ml and 0.85 h, respectively. These results indicate that azasetron is absorbed to a greater extent and more rapidly into the systemic circulation via the rectum than via the intestine in rabbits. Consequently, the suppository form of azasetron hydrochloride may be feasible for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced acute emesis and nausea.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Absorption of phenytoin from rectal suppositories formulated with a polyethylene glycol base.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare phenytoin pharmacokinetics following administration of an oral suspension and a rectal suppository formulated with a polyethylene glycol base. DESIGN: Unblinded, single-dose, randomized, crossover trial. SETTING: University-affiliated pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics laboratory. SUBJECTS: Six healthy subjects. INTERVENTION: Subjects were given a single 200-mg dose of phenytoin as an oral suspension and a rectal suppository separated by a 1-week washout. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Blood for plasma phenytoin concentrations was obtained at baseline and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 hours after administration. Plasma was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (coefficient of variation < 6%) for total phenytoin concentration. Phenytoin maximum concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (Tmax), time to first measurable concentration (Tlag), and area under the curve from time zero to time of last measurable concentration (AUClast) were estimated for oral and rectal administration by WinNonlin (v 1.1) and compared using Wilcoxon's signed rank test (p<0.05 for statistical significance). Two subjects did not have detectable plasma phenytoin concentrations after rectal administration. For the other four subjects, median rectal Cmax was significantly lower than oral Cmax (0.4 vs 1.9 microg/ml, p=0.028), median rectal Tmax did not differ from oral Tmax (11.9 vs 8.0 hrs, p=0.465), and median rectal AUClast, although highly variable, was significantly lower than oral AUClast (5.4 vs 36.2 microg x hr/ml, p=0.046). No Tlag was seen after oral administration, but with rectal administration the median Tlag was 2 hours. The estimated relative bioavailability of rectal phenytoin suppositories based on AUC0-24 was 4.7%, with individual values ranging from 0-58.3%. CONCLUSION: It appears that absorption of phenytoin from polyethylene glycol rectal suppositories in healthy subjects is highly variable and unpredictable. Thus this formulation is not recommended.

Administration, Rectal↗
PubMed1991

Pharmacokinetics of rectal drug administration, Part I. General considerations and clinical applications of centrally acting drugs.

Generally, oral administration is the route of choice in the daily practice of pharmacotherapy. However, in some circumstances this is impractical or even impossible (during nausea and vomiting or convulsions, in uncooperative patients and before surgery). In these cases, the rectal route may represent a practical alternative and rectal administration is now well accepted for delivering, for example, anticonvulsants, non-narcotic and narcotic analgesics, theophylline, antiemetics and antibacterial agents, and for inducing anaesthesia in children. It may also represent an interesting alternative to intravenous or other injection routes of drug administration. The rate and extent of rectal drug absorption are often lower than with oral absorption, possibly an inherent factor owing to the relatively small surface area available for drug uptake. In addition, the composition of the rectal formulation (solid vs liquid, nature of the suppository base) appears to be an important factor in the absorption process by determining the pattern of drug release. This relation between formulation and drug uptake has been clearly demonstrated for drugs like diazepam, paracetamol (acetaminophen), indomethacin, methadone and diflunisal. Coadministration of absorption-promoting agents (surfactants, sodium salicylate, enamines) represents another approach towards manipulating rectal drug absorption, although this concept requires further research concerning both efficacy and safety. For a number of drugs the extent of rectal absorption has been reported to exceed oral values, which may reflect partial avoidance of hepatic first-pass metabolism after rectal delivery. This phenomenon has been reported for morphine, metoclopramide, ergotamine, lidocaine (lignocaine) and propranolol. Rectal drug delivery in a site- and rate-controlled manner using osmotic pumps or hydrogel formulations may provide opportunities for manipulating systemic drug concentrations and drug effects. The extent of first-pass metabolism may be influenced (lidocaine), depending on the site of drug administration in the rectum. The rate of delivery may determine systemic drug action and side effects (nifedipine), and it may affect the local action of concurrently administered absorption promoters on drug uptake (cefoxitin). Local irritation is increasingly being acknowledged as a possible complication of rectal drug therapy. Long term medication with rectal ergotamine and acetylsalicylic acid, for example, may result in rectal ulceration, and irritation after a single administration of several drugs and formulations has been described. The assessment of tolerability and safety is imperative in the design of rectal formulations. Recent studies corroborate the clinical relevance of rectal drug therapy, and the value of the rectal route as an alternative to parenteral administration has been assessed for several drugs, e.g. diazepam, midazolam, morphine and diclofenac.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Administration, Rectal↗