Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “RECTAL PROLAPSE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Rectal prolapse: a search for the "best" operation.

There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal operative treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapse. We describe our experience in the management of procidentia and evaluate our current practice for improvement of results. The medical records of patients undergoing surgery for rectal prolapse between 1989 to 1999 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 36 perineal proctosigmoidectomies (PPSs) and 29 abdominal procedures [17 anterior resections (ARs) and 12 Ripstein procedures (RPs)] were performed during the 10-year period. Patients undergoing PPS were significantly older and had more comorbidities. Mean operating time and length of hospital stay were shorter for the PPS group. Early and late postoperative complication rates were also significantly lower in the PPS group. Six patients (16%) in the PPS group developed recurrence at a mean follow-up of 50 months. Operation under general anesthesia or removal of a longer segment of prolapsed bowel did not reduce recurrence after PPS. No full-thickness recurrence was noted after AR or RP. We conclude that abdominal procedures (AR and RP) have the lowest recurrence but at a significantly higher cost in terms of complications. PPS is a valuable option in selected patients and can be performed with minimal morbidity and a relatively low recurrence rate.

Abdominal Muscles↗
PubMed2005

Isolated rectal diverticulum complicating with rectal prolapse and outlet obstruction: case report.

The occurrence of rectal diverticula is very rare, with only sporadic reports in the literature since 1911. Symptomatic rectal diverticula are encountered even less frequently. Treatments of these complicated events range from conservative treatments to major surgical interventions. We present a hitherto unreported occurrence of isolated rectal diverticulum complicated with rectal prolapse and outlet obstruction. Delorme's procedure resulted in subsidence of symptoms and resolution of the diverticulum. It provides a minimal invasive surgical technique to successfully address the reported malady.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Delorme's procedure for rectal prolapse: clinical and physiological analysis.

PURPOSE: Clinical and physiological results of Delorme's procedure were assessed retrospectively in patients undergoing this procedure for rectal prolapse. METHODS: A consecutive series of 31 patients (7 males, 24 females; age, 14-93, mean 70 years) with full-thickness, rectal prolapse were treated by Delorme's procedure between 1994 and 2002. Median follow-up was 39 (range, 6-96) months. RESULTS: Good results were achieved in 27 patients (87 percent), prolapse recurrence was observed in 4 (13 percent), and mean recurrence time was 14 (range, 3-25) months. There were no postoperative deaths. Minor complications occurred in four patients. The median changes in preoperative and postoperative physiologic patterns in 16 patients were as follows: resting pressure from 21.0 (range, 5-48) to 23.5 (range, 12-76) cm H2O (P = 0.030), squeeze pressure from 64.0 (range, 27-248) to 108.0 (range, 32-264) cm H2O (P = 0.041), volume at first sensation from 100 (range, 70-180) to 70 (range, 40-130) ml (P = 0.002), maximum tolerated volume from 260 (range, 120-400) to 160 (range, 70-400) ml (P = 0.001). Incontinence improved in 63 percent. No patient became constipated, and 38 percent of those constipated preoperatively improved. The preoperative incontinence score improved from 11.5 (range, 1-20) to 6.0 (range, 0-20) after operation (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Delorme's procedure had a low morbidity, did not lead to constipation, improved anal continence, and had a reasonably low recurrence rate. Improved anal sphincter and rectal sensation were associated with a reduced incidence of defecatory problems after Delorme's procedure.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

[Posterior rectopexy in total rectal prolapse-].

STUDY AIM: The aim of this retrospective study was to report the results of posterior Orr-Loygue rectopexy in 55 patients operated on for rectal prolapse. PATIENTS AND METHOD: From 1986 to 1997, 114 patients were operated on for rectal prolapse and 55 had an Orr-Loygue operation. There were 47 women and 8 men (mean age: 55 years). Twenty-five patients (45%) had fecal incontinence, 26 (47%) described preoperative 'constipation'. The procedure was performed under general anesthesia, through laparotomy in 51 patients, through laparoscopy in 4 patients. Resection of sigmoid colon was associated to rectopexy in four patients. RESULTS: Mortality rate was 0 and morbidity rate 12%. Mean hospital stay duration was 13.5 days. Mean follow-up was 63 months and at the end of the study, four patients (7%) had recurrence, 5/25 patients had still incontinence; 55% of the patients had unchanged postoperative bowel function, 22% described improvement (including the four patients with resection-rectopexy) but 38% (21/55) suffered from postoperative 'constipation'. The rate of 'constipation' induced or majored by rectopexy was 22% but the functional trouble described appeared often complex. CONCLUSION: Posterior Orr-Loygue rectopexy is the operation recommended for patients in good general condition, especially if fecal incontinence is associated. In the course of the procedure, preservation of pelvic nerves and hypogastric plexus, and positioning of the strips not too tight between the anterolateral rectal walls and promontory must be emphasized. Posterior Orr-Loygue rectopexy is contraindicated when general anesthesis is too risky and when bowel dysfunction and/or rectal exoneration dysfunction are present.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Delorme's operation and sphincteroplasty for rectal prolapse and fecal incontinence.

Clinical and manometric results of Delorme's operation and sphincteroplasty were assessed retrospectively in patients undergoing this procedure for fecal incontinence and rectal prolapse. A series of 33 patients (11 males, 22 females; aged 18-83 years, mean 59) with external rectal prolapse were treated by Delorme's operation between 1989 and 1996. Mean follow-up was 39 months (range 7-84). Sphincteroplasty was associated in 12 cases with severe fecal incontinence due to striated muscle defects. Good results were achieved in 27 patients (79%); prolapse recurrence was observed in 6 (21%), the mean recurrence time being 9 months (range 1-24 months). There were no postoperative deaths. Minor complications occurred in 15 patients. Changes in preoperative and postoperative manometric patterns were as follows (mean +/- SEM): voluntary contraction from 59 +/- 6.9 to 66 +/- 7.1 mmHg (P = 0.05), resting tone from 33 +/- 5 to 32 +/- 4.3 mmHg, rectal sensation from 59 +/- 5 to 61 +/- 5.2 ml of air (n.s.). A solitary rectal ulcer syndrome was detected in five patients. The histological pattern demonstrated pathological changes in 40% of cases. Fecal incontinence was resolved in 6 of 20 cases (30%) and chronic constipation in 4 of 9 (44%). Failure (n = 3) was related primarily to postoperative sepsis. The incontinence score showed a mean improvement of 35% decreasing, from 4.5 +/- 0.39 to 2.9 +/- 0.44 after surgery (P < 0.01). In conclusion, Delorme's procedure did not lead to constipation and improved anal continence when associated with sphincteroplasty.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Laparoscopic repair of rectal prolapse: surgical technique.

Technical features of laparoscopic rectopexy include complete rectal mobilization without division of the lateral stalks to avoid parasympathetic denervation and postoperative problems with defecation. Suture rectopexy is equally effective as posterior mesh rectopexy in preventing recurrences and eliminates the use of foreign material which is sometimes associated with intense fibrosis, sepsis and increased constipation. According to two randomised studies constipation seems to be less after resection rectopexy than suture or posterior mesh rectopexy alone perhaps by eliminating possible kinking at the rectosigmoid region by falling of the redundant sigmoid colon in the pouch of Douglas. Randomized studies are, however, needed to validate the need for colonic resection and to determine its optimal extent in patients who suffer from rectal prolapse, constipation and slow transit.

Humans↗
PubMed1992

[Anterior and posterior rectopexy with levator repair in patients with rectal prolapse and incontinence].

A prospective clinical, manometric and radiological study has been performed, before and after rectopexy, on 18 female patients with complete rectal prolapse, and varying degrees of incontinence. All patients, mean age 62 years, underwent anterior-posterior fixation (Ivalon or Vicryl) of the rectum with posterior pelvic repair of the puborectalis muscle. 13 patients with obstipation and rectal prolapse were treated by rectopexy combined with sigmoidectomy. Postoperatively there was a significant increase in the resting anal pressure and maximum voluntary contraction pressure (p = 0.01). Continence was improved in 16 patients (89 percent), 9 (56 percent) of whom regained normal continence. No significant change in pelvic descent or anorectal angle was seen postoperatively. Following abdominal rectopexy and resection obstipation was reduced in 9 of 13 patients (70 percent).

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Complete rectal prolapse in Enugu, Nigeria.

The case records of thirty patients (21 male and 9 female) aged 8 to 62 years treated for complete rectal prolapse by operation over 5 years were studied. The results of treatment were compared with those in seven consecutive patients treated more recently by posterior rectopexy. Thiersch operation has been attended by an unacceptable high rate of reoccurrence, recurrent sepsis and faecal impaction. We recommend that is use should be abandoned. Anterior resection, usually more successful, is also associated with significant morbidity. We consider it too formidable an operation for a benign condition. We have found posterior rectopexy to be simple, safe and effective and we recommend it for the surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Transsacral rectopexy for recurrent complete rectal prolapse.

The aim of this study was to examine the functional outcome of transsacral rectopexy performed with Dexon mesh for recurrent complete rectal prolapse. Anorectal function was assessed by anorectal manometry and defecography, before and from 1 year after surgery in five patients who were followed up for 1-3 years. The fecal incontinence score recovered from a preoperative mean score of 3.8 to a postoperative mean score of 1.2, and constipation was improved in four patients (80%). The straining anorectal angle (S-ARA), measured by defecography, improved from a preoperative value of 120.6 degrees +/- 6.9 degrees to a postoperative value of 98.5 degrees +/- 3.5 degrees (P < 0.05), and the perineal descent (PD) improved from a preoperative value of 16.2 +/- 2.5 cm to a postoperative value of 8.1 +/- 1.3 cm (P < 0.05). The maximal resting pressure (MRP) increased from a preoperative value of 20.5 +/- 3.7 cmH2O to a postoperative value of 40.5 +/- 4.8 cmH2O (P < 0.05). These findings indicate that transsacral rectopexy with Dexon mesh can achieve good control of recurrent complete rectal prolapse.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Stapled laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse.

The widespread success of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has led to the development of a wide range of laparoscopic surgical procedures. Procedures for treating rectal prolapse (Procidentia) may constitute some of the best applications for colorectal laparoscopic techniques. A technique of laparoscopic rectopexy performed using the endo-stapler is described. Twenty-nine consecutive patients have undergone laparoscopic rectopexy. The median age was 71 years (52-89), and male:female ratio was 27:2. One procedure had to be converted to open due to ventilatory difficulties. The mean operative time was 95 minutes (50-190). The mean hospital stay was 5 days (4-15). There was no mortality in this series. Morbidity included incisional hernia through a port hole (n = 1), extraperitoneal haematoma (n = 1), and urinary tract infection with retention (n = 1). In conclusion, laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy is a safe and effective technique in the management of rectal prolapse.

Aged↗
PubMed1988

Abdominal rectopexy and sigmoid resection (Frykman-Goldberg operation) for rectal prolapse.

Transabdominal posterior rectopexy with resection of the redundant left colon (Frykman-Goldberg operation) was performed on 48 selected patients with complete rectal prolapse. Uterine suspension was also performed on most of the women. The 30-day mortality rate was 2.1%. Prolapse recurred in 4 (9%) of the 45 patients followed up for 1-10 (mean 4.3) years. There were no complications attributable to bowel resection or anastomosis. Adequate data on both preoperative and postoperative anal function and bowel habit were available in 41 cases. All but two of the 32 patients with associated incontinence experienced improved anal control after the operation (9 regained normal continence). Bowel habit improved in 23 patients (56%), especially in those with chronic constipation. No patient reported increased problems of bowel management. The operation does not involve the risks associated with implantation of foreign material and can be especially beneficial for constipated patients with rectal prolapse who are fit for major abdominal surgery.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

[Total rectal prolapse in adults: report of 26 cases in the Ivory Coast].

Several studies are still in progress to improve the results of rectopexy for treatment of full thickness rectal prolapse in adults. The purpose of this study was to evaluate etiologic factors of full thickness rectal prolapse in Ivory Coast and to describe results in 26 patients treated surgically in Africa over a period of 10 years. There were 23 men with ages ranging from 30 to 45 years and 3 women with ages ranging from 45 to 50 years. All three women were multiparous. Related factors in the men were chronic constipation in 69.2%, diarrhea in 11.5%, and dysuria in 7.7%. Fifteen patients (59.7%) presented anal incontinence prior to surgery. Rectoscopy was performed in 23 cases and findings were always normal. Barium enema x-rays were performed in 3 cases and demonstrated dolicho-colon. The Orr-Loygue rectopexy procedure was performed in 23 patients and direct rectopexy in 3 patients. No operative deaths occurred and no recurrences have been observed with a follow-up of 24 months. Constipation developed following surgery in two patients and persisted in all patients who presented this symptom prior to surgery. Progressive improvement was observed in all fifteen patients with preoperative anal incontinence. Based on these results, our current management strategy includes determination of colonic transit time to select indications for direct rectopexy with sigmoidectomy.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Biofeedback therapy in rectal prolapse patients.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of perioperative biofeedback training on postoperative continence in patients with rectal prolapse. METHODS: Thirty-six consecutive patients were operated on between 1987 and 1993. Twenty-nine could be traced for reexamination. Four were excluded because of a recurring prolapse. Anal manometry, assessment of rectoanal sensation, and surface electromyography were performed during the reexamination. From 1987 to 1991, no perioperative biofeedback training was given (Group 1, n = 14). Since the beginning of 1992, incontinent patients were given biofeedback training (Group 2, n = 11). RESULTS: Continence scores improved in both study groups. Both study groups had equally low resting pressures compared with Group 3 (controls) (30.6 +/- 14.9 vs. 53.0 +/- 11.9 mmHg; P < 0.001). Anal resting pressure correlated with postoperative continence score, whereas contractile pressures did not (r = -0.5,P < 0.05, and r = -0.3, p = not significant, respectively). CONCLUSION: Biofeedback therapy can improve the function of external sphincter; however, the most important reason for postoperative incontinence in rectal prolapse patients is low resting pressure that cannot be corrected by biofeedback therapy.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Treatment of complete rectal prolapse: to narrow, to wrap, to suspend, to fix, to encircle, to plicate or to resect?

Selection of the best surgical procedure for the treatment of complete rectal prolapse is difficult amid the many different techniques for which excellent results are reported. A critical review is given. It is concluded that any surgical procedure with rectal mobilization and fixation as a standard maneuver will lead to a recurrence rate of 2% to 4%. Advocacy of additional maneuvers to make the procedure easier is acceptable if it does not lead to a higher complication rate. But to obtain a better result its benefit has to be proven, either by a large prospective double-blind study, or by tests from the colorectal laboratory. New surgical techniques for rectal prolapse should therefore be based, not only on a low recurrence and complication rate, but also on tests that evaluate the effect of the procedure on fecal continence.

Humans↗
PubMed2003

Preserving the superior rectal artery in laparoscopic sigmoid resection for complete rectal prolapse.

Sigmoid resection is indicated in the treatment of complete rectal prolapse (CRP) in patients with prolonged colorectal transit time (CTT). Its use, however, has been limited because of fear of anastomotic leakage. This study challenges the current practice of dividing the mesorectum by prospectively evaluating the impact of sparing the superior rectal artery (SRA) on leak rates after laparoscopic sigmoid resection (LSR) for CRP. During a 30-month period, data on 33 selected patients with CRP were prospectively collected. Three patients were withdrawn from the analysis, as they had neither resection nor anastomosis. Twenty-nine women and 1 man (median age 55 range 21-83 years) underwent LSR with preservation of SRA for a median CRP of 8 (3-15) cm. There were 20 ASA I and 10 ASA II patients. Ten patients had undergone previous surgery. Four patients complained of dyschezia, whereas incontinence was present in 26 patients. Anal ultrasound showed isolated internal sphincter defects in 2 patients. Four young adults (21-32 years) had normal CTT, whereas 26 older patients had a median CTT of 5(4-6) days. Defecography demonstrated 10 enteroceles, two sigmoidoceles, and one rectal hernia through the levator ani muscle. Mortality was nil. Median operating room time was 180 (120-330) min, suprapubic incision length 5(3-7) cm, estimated blood loss 150 (50-500) mL, specimen length 20 (12-45) cm, solid food resumption 3(1-6) days, and length of stay 4.5(2-7) days. Thirty-day complications were not related to anastomosing and occurred in 20% of the patients. Median follow-up was 34.1 (18-48) months. One patient had a recurrence. Although the evidence provided by the present study suggests that sparing SRA has a favorable impact on anastomotic leak rates, these nonrandomized results need further evaluation. The division of the mesorectum at the rectosigmoid junction seems not necessary, and its sparing should therefore be considered as it may contain anastomotic leak rates.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Preserving the superior rectal artery in laparoscopic sigmoid resection for complete rectal prolapse.

Sigmoid resection is indicated in the treatment of complete rectal prolapse (CRP) in patients with prolonged colorectal transit time (CTT). Its use however has been limited due to fear of anastomotic leakage. This study challenges the current practice of dividing the mesorectum by prospectively evaluating the impact of sparing the superior rectal artery (SRA) on leak rates after laparoscopic sigmoid resection (LSR) for CRP. During 30 months data on 33 selected patients with CRP were prospectively collected. Three patients were withdrawn from the analysis, as they had neither resection nor anastomosis. Twenty-nine women and one man (median age 55 range 21-83 years) underwent LSR with preservation of SRA for a median CRP of 8 (3-15) cm. There were 20 ASA I and 10 ASA II patients. Ten patients had undergone previous surgery. Four patients complained of dyschezia, whereas incontinence was present in 26 patients. Anal ultrasound showed isolated internal sphincter defects in two patients. Four young adults (21-32 years) had normal CTT, whereas 26 older patients had a median CTT of 5 (4-6) days. Defecography demonstrated 10 enteroceles, two sigmoidoceles, and one rectal hernia through the levator ani muscle. Mortality was nil. Median operating room time was 180 (120-330) min, suprapubic incision length 5 (3-7) cm, estimated blood loss 150 (50-500) ml, specimen length 20 (12-45) cm, solid food resumption 3 (1-6) days, and length of stay 4.5 (2-7) days. Thirty-day complications were not related to anastomosing and occurred in 20% of the patients. Although the evidence provided by the present study suggests that sparing SRA has a favorable impact on anastomotic leak rates, these nonrandomized results need further evaluation. The division of the mesorectum at the rectosigmoid junction seems not necessary, and its sparing should therefore be considered as it may contain anastomotic leak rates.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Treatment of rectal prolapse by Delorme's operation.

Rectopexy in the sacral hollow or to the promontory with synthetic material is the most efficient method of reducing and fixing a complete rectal prolapse. However, this distressing condition occurs frequently in elderly patients, often with high operative risk. In these some surgeons have advocated a perineal approach. Eighteen female patients (mean age 74 years) with complete rectal prolapse have been treated by a modified Delorme's procedure which involves a mucosal stripping of the prolapse and longitudinal plication of the muscular wall of the rectum. There was no postoperative mortality or morbidity. After a mean follow-up of 18 months, two complete recurrences occurred. These were treated by the same technique with a good result at 3 years. One other patient presented a partial and intermittent recurrence. Incontinence has improved in four patients and was not made worse in the others. Our results and those previously published show that this procedure is safe in elderly high risk patients considered too unfit for transabdominal surgery.

Aged↗
PubMed1988

Repair of rectal prolapse by rectosacral suture fixation.

In 46 patients with complete rectal prolapse a simple method of rectopexy was used, fixing the mobilized rectum to the sacrum with sutures. In 17 cases the rectopexy was supplemented with levator sutures. The patients' age range was 20-87 years and follow-up was 6 months to 17 years. There was no associated mortality and almost no morbidity. Prolapse recurred in two cases, in one of them due to incomplete fixation because of a congenital pelvic deformity. Rectopexy with sutures seemed to give results as good as the Teflon mesh and Ivalon sponge methods in regard to recurrence rate, while avoiding the complication risks associated with insertion of foreign material.

Adult↗